Next Article in Journal
The Challenges to a Successful COVID-19 Vaccination Programme in Africa
Previous Article in Journal
Alcohol-Based Hand Sanitizer—Composition, Proper Use and Precautions
 
 
GERMS is published by MDPI from Volume 15 Issue 4 (2025). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with the former publisher Infection Science Forum.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Parasitic Zoonoses in the Roma Population

by
Lucija Bajkovec
1,
Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek
2,3,
Ljubo Barbic
3,4 and
Anna Mrzljak
3,5,*
1
Institute of Emergency Medicine of Međimurje County, 40000 Čakovec, Croatia
2
Department of Microbiology, Croatian Institute of Public Health, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
3
School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Salata 3b, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
4
Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases with Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
5
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Kispaticeva 12, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
GERMS 2021, 11(3), 418-426; https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2021.1279
Submission received: 17 March 2021 / Revised: 13 August 2021 / Accepted: 14 August 2021 / Published: 29 September 2021

Abstract

Roma people are the largest minority group in Europe. The vast majority live in substandard conditions in segregated settlements, overcrowded with people and animals that predispose them to various, especially zoonotic diseases. Parasitic zoonotic diseases remain a challenge in this vulnerable population group, especially among Roma children. PubMed was searched using the keywords Roma with combination of names of different parasites to get all available studies on prevalence of parasitic zoonoses among European Roma, published between years 2000 and 2020. After application of exclusion criteria, data were extracted from the studies that made the final sample. Parasitic zoonoses are common among Roma. Cryptosporidium, Toxoplasma gondii, soil- transmitted helminths and Giardia spp. are more common in Roma children compared to non-Roma children, and Toxoplasma gondii and soil-transmitted helminths are also more common in Roma adults compared to non-Roma adults. Data on prevalence of trichinellosis, echinococcosis, and taeniasis among Roma show that they do not affect Roma more often compared to the general population. Roma people, particularly children, are more susceptible to parasitic zoonoses. Substandard sanitary conditions and close contact with infected animals are important risk factors in this population and should be aimed with preventive measures.

Introduction

Zoonotic diseases encompass a wide range of pathogens and modes of transmission. Pathogens that can cause zoonoses include viruses, bacteria and parasites. The transmission mainly occurs through food or by different vectors [1]. It is estimated that around 60% of all human infections originate from animals [1], and 75% of all new infections in humans occur due to interspecies transmission [2]. Many zoonoses are endemic and characteristic for particular regions, usually where poverty, lack of access to clean water, and sewage systems are highly prevalent, and therefore the transmission of pathogens through contaminated food and water or direct contact with animals is facilitated [3].
Roma people are the largest transnational minority group in Europe, with approximately 12 million living mainly in central and eastern European countries [4]. The Roma settled in Europe in the 12th century, initially migrating from north-west India [5,6], Throughout history, the European Roma have been disadvantaged, as they have been discriminated population in many European countries, and even victims of genocide during the Nazi rule [7]. These disadvantages reflect even today in their social, economic, and political vulnerability [8]. Many still live in poor socioeconomic conditions in isolated settlements [9]. The settlements are often built on loose soil, with no access to clean drinking water and without proper sanitary facilities and sewage systems [10]. Poverty is widespread among Roma due to a lack of formal education, illiteracy, segregation in the educational system, and unemployment [11]. Roma people have significantly poorer health status, shorter life expectancy, and more often suffer from chronic and communicable diseases than their non-Roma counterparts [8,12], Communicable diseases are prevalent, and Roma children are particularly susceptible to parasitic diseases [8]. Moreover, numerous unregistered animals, with no veterinary care, live in many Roma settlements and share already overcrowded living areas with people [11,13], As a consequence of poor living conditions and close contact with animals, zoonoses, such as cryptosporidiosis, microsporidiosis, toxoplasmosis, giardiasis, and infections with soil-transmitted helminths (STHs) are common [11,13,14], Studies on parasitic zoonoses in European Roma are scarce and mainly limited to Central and Eastern European countries.
In this review, we aim to summarize the available data on prevalence and risk factors for parasitic zoonoses among Roma, and address the burning issues related to emerging zoonoses in European Roma population and possible measures that can be taken in order to minimize their spread.

Methods

Literature search
A systematic literature search was conducted to identify the available studies reporting on the prevalence of certain parasitic zoonoses in Roma population in Europe. The search was performed using PubMed and MEDLINE database. The keywords used included “Roma” OR “Gypsy” OR “Romani” AND “Cryptosporidium” OR “Microsporidia” OR “Soil-transmitted helminths” OR “Toxoplasma” OR “Toxocara” OR “Echinococcus” OR “Trichinella” OR “Strongyloides” OR “Ascaris” OR “Trichuris” OR “Giardia” OR “Taenia” OR “Parasites”. Publication date was set to show all studies published from years 2000 to 2020. Studies were screened by the title and abstract and further processed if they met inclusion criteria.
Inclusion criteria
Following inclusion criteria were used to make the selection of the studies: (i) type of the study must be original article; (ii) studies written in English; (iii) studies conducted in Europe.
Exclusion criteria
Studies were excluded if they met following criteria: (i) studies that did not provide required data; (ii) studies with no available abstract.
Data extraction
Relevant data were extracted by two reviewers and included: name of the country from which the article originated, year of publication, name of the first author, name of the investigated parasite species, sample size, sample characteristics, prevalence of infection, identified risk factors.

Results

Study selection
Literature search provided a total of 588 relevant articles; 330 articles were excluded because the sample consisted of animals, instead of humans. Out of the remaining 258 studies, 7 were excluded because of the inadequate article type. Furthermore, 98 articles originated from European countries and were further processed. After the exclusion criteria were applied, the final sample consisted of 14 articles.
Characteristics of the studies
The 14 selected studies were published in the year range from 2011 to 2020. The majority of them (n=13) were conducted in Slovakia, with ten of them focusing on the area of east Slovakia, and one on North-eastern Slovakia. One study originated from Romania. Children were the population of interest in seven studies, whereas four studies included only adult participants and three studies examined samples consisting of adult respondents and children. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. was investigated in four studies, microsporidia in one, Giardia duodenalis in four, Toxoplasma gondii in two, soil-transmitted helminths in seven, Trichinella spp. in two, and Echinococcus spp. in two studies (Table 1).
Findings on each of the parasites are presented in the sections below.
Prevalence of zoonotic parasitoses among Roma
Cryptosporidium
Cryptosporidium infection has a high prevalence among Roma children living in Eastern Slovakia settlements (44.4%) [15]. On the other hand, studies conducted in 2016 and 2017 revealed a much lower prevalence of Cryptosporidium infection among Roma children, 1.2%[16] and 3.3%, respectively [17]. A comparative study on the prevalence of Cryptosporidium showed a 12-fold higher risk of infection in Slovakian Roma children versus non-Roma. The prevalence of infection among Roma (under five years) was 11.3%, while in children under one year old, it reached 22.7%. None of the non- Roma children were infected [13].
Microsporidia
Enterocytozoon bieneusi was detected by real- time PCR in 4.2% and Encephalitozoon cuniculi in 26.4% of stool samples from clinically healthy children (≤14 years old) of non-integrated Roma minority in Slovakia. Co-infections with E. bieneusi and E. cuniculi were detected only in one child (1.4%). Positive cases were observed in all age groups with the highest positivity (35.3%) in children aged six to nine years. The risk of E. cuniculi infection was found to be nearly 1.7-fold higher in boys compared to girls and 4.3-fold higher for boys compared with girls in the case of E. bieneusi infection [18].
Toxoplasma gondii
A Slovakian study showed higher toxoplasma seropositivity in Roma (45.0%) compared to the majority population (24.1%). Poverty and higher age were identified as significant risk factors for the infection. Among Roma, the highest prevalence was detected in those older than 50 years, whereas in non-Roma group, highest seropositivity was in 30-39 years old participants. However, higher seropositivity in older participants can be explained by the accumulation of positive cases through years [11].
Roma children are also at higher risk for infection compared to non-Roma children (20.9% vs. 7.1%). However, when results were categorized according to age, the highest prevalence of antibodies was found in Roma participants aged 12-18 (46.2%) [19]. Cat ownership, rural residence, everyday exposure to soil, consumption of raw meat, and meat processing were found to increase the risk of infection [19].
Soil-transmitted helminths (STHs)
Toxocara spp.
Toxocara infection has been more frequent in Roma than non-Roma adults (22.1% vs. 1%). Increasing age and worse sanitary conditions, such as lack of tap water, flushing toilet, bathroom and sewage system are associated with greater risk of infection [20]. Moreover, another study showed that Toxocara spp. infection is highly prevalent in Roma children (40.3%) and more frequent than in other high-risk groups, including hunters, veterinarians, and farmers. Female gender, living in rural areas, everyday contact with soil and frequent outdoor activities increased the risk of infection [21].
Ascaris lumbricoides
In a study from 2017, among 81 of the healthy Roma children living in Eastern Slovakia, 24.7% tested positive for Ascaris lumbricoides [15]. In another Slovakian study that included Roma children, 73.3% of fecal samples were positive. Those children were living in settlements with poor communal hygiene, with streams in the village as a source of water [17]. Several studies reported higher occurrence of this pathogen among Roma compared to non-Roma children. In a study from 2017, higher occurrence of parasitic diseases among Roma children in comparison to non-Roma children was observed (25.8% and 0.7%). A. lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura were the most typical pathogens. A significant difference in the prevalence of parasites was observed between Roma children living in rural and urban areas (28.4% vs. 10.5%), which could be attributed to environmental contamination in rural areas. Boys and girls were equally affected. Additionally, Roma children living in Košice County showed a higher prevalence (31.8%), than those living in Prešov County (19.7%) [10]. Another study confirmed higher occurrence of endoparasites among children living in village with predominantly Roma residents, compared to village mostly inhabited with general Slovakian population (53.2% vs. 0%). Ascaris spp. was the dominant parasite among children (52.2%) and dogs (40.9%) living in village with over 95% of Roma population [22]. In 2016, a study on the prevalence of intestinal parasites was conducted among Slovakian children from the Košice region aged <18 years. The prevalence of A. lumbricoides in a group of Roma children was 49.4%, while in the non-Roma group it was 0.8% [16].
Trichuris trichiura
T. trichiura was detected in 17.3% of stool samples taken from healthy Roma children living in Eastern Slovakia. Prevalence was higher in children aged six to nine years [15]. Furthermore, this parasite was found in 18.3% of Roma children living in Medzev, in poor sanitary conditions, with improper source of water (local streams) [17]. In a study that compared the prevalence of parasites among two villages, the prevalence of T. trichiura among children living in village with predominantly Roma residents was 2.4%, while in a village with predominantly Slovakian residents no cases of infection were detected [22]. In a study from 2016, the prevalence among Roma children living in Košice region was 14.1%, while no positive samples were found in the non-Roma group [16].
Strongyloides stercoralis
The Slovakian comparative study (2013- 2015) investigated the prevalence of STHs among Roma and non-Roma school children living in Medzev. Roma children were coming from a settlement with poor communal hygiene and improper water sources, that is, a stream in the village served as a source of water supply. Out of 60 examined Roma children, 33.3% had detectable IgG antibodies against S. stercoralis, with the highest seroprevalence among children one to five years (38.1%), compared to 23.8% in non-Roma children. A high prevalence of soil contamination was observed; 13/14 soil samples taken in Roma settlement were positive for some of the endoparasites. When the prevalence of S. stercoralis was compared between dogs from the settlements and dogs from the shelter, no significant difference was found [17].
Echinococcus spp.
Two published studies from Slovakia analysed the seroprevalence of Echinococcus spp. No significant difference was found, as seropositivity in Roma and non-Roma population was 0.5% vs. 0.8% for E. granulosus, and 1% vs. 0.3% for E. multilocularis in one study [23], and 0.2% vs. 0% for Echinococcus spp. in another study [24].
Other STHs
In a study that included two villages with different population structure, the one with over 95% of Roma population had a higher prevalence of different endoparasites, Hymenolepis diminuta was found in 0.5%, and Enterobius vermicularis in 1% of the samples, while in a village inhabited mostly with Slovakian general population, these parasites weren’t detected [22].
Among Roma children living in Košice region, E. vermicularis had a prevalence of 16.5%, Hymenolepis nana 0.6%, Taenia spp. 0.3%, and Ancylostomatidae spp. 0.3%. In 64.4% of children a mono-infection caused by one endoparasite species was detected. Mixed infections were confirmed in 23.2% of the examined samples. The highest number of positive samples was observed in children aged six to nine years. In the non-Roma group, a similar prevalence of E. vermicularis (14.7%) and Taenia spp. (0.8%) was found, while no cases of Ancylostomatidae and H. nana were detected [16]. In a study that included 81 healthy Roma children living in Eastern Slovakia, 56.8% of stool samples were positive for some of the intestinal parasites. Taenia spp. was found in 4.9% of the samples. Children aged six to nine years were more often positive to some of the parasites, while no Taenia infection cases were found in children under one year old [15].
Giardia duodenalis
A Slovakian study that investigated the prevalence of different parasites among healthy Roma children detected a high occurrence of the protozoan parasite, G. duodenalis, in 24.7% of the respondents [15]. Furthermore, this parasite was found in 11.7% of Roma children in another Slovakian study [17]. Compared to non-Roma children, Roma children living in settlements were more frequently infected (14.1% vs. 1.6%) [16]. Additionally, G. duodenalis was detected in 8.3% of stool samples taken from the children living in village with predominantly Roma residents, whereas in a village where most of the residents were of Slovak general population, no positive samples were detected [22].
Trichinella spp.
Between 2007 and 2009, the Roma minority accounted for most of the cases of trichinellosis in Romania. Most of the infected adults were unemployed and had lower incomes, resulting in more frequent consumption of home-made pork products [25]. However, a recent Slovakian study in the Košice region reported no significant difference in Trichinella spp. seroprevalence among Roma compared to non-Roma. Seropositivity to Trichinella was confirmed in only two out of 429 Roma participants (0.5%). No seropositive cases were found in the non-Roma group of participants [24].

Discussion

Our study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors for parasitic zoonoses among Roma population living in Europe. All except one study included in the review originated from Slovakia. This is understandable given the high number of Roma residents in that country. However, there is no data on this issue from other countries with large proportion of Roma population, such as Bulgaria, Slovakia, Spain, etc. [26], which would be helpful in order to get a more detailed picture of the state of Roma’s health. Furthermore, Roma who participated in the studies were mostly living in segregated settlements, however, this is true for the majority of the European Roma population [9].
The data suggest that parasitic zoonoses, including cryptosporidiosis, microsporidiosis, toxoplasmosis, infection with the majority of STHs and G. duodenalis, are very common in Roma population. Cryptosporidium, T. gondii, STHs and Giardia spp. are more common in Roma children compared to non-Roma children, whereas T. gondii and STHs are also more common in Roma adults compared to non-Roma adults. On the contrary, trichinellosis, echinococcosis, and taeniasis have not been shown to be more prevalent among Roma compared to the general population.
Several possible reasons could be behind the higher prevalence of zoonotic diseases in Roma living in segregated settlements. No access to clean water and no monitoring of water quality is a major problem that leads to higher prevalence of water-borne parasitoses [15,27,28], Additionally, inadequate garbage disposal and low hygienic standards attract animals, such as rodents, which also often share housing with people in settlements. Exposure to animals increases the chances of acquiring zoonotic diseases [13,18], and numerous animals in settlements increase the chance of soil contamination [15,29], High rates of soil contamination and frequent infection among animals living in settlements have been detected in two studies, suggesting that Roma are more exposed to sources of infection [17,22], Living in rural areas [30], and frequent consummation of undercooked meat and unwashed vegetables and fruits represent another risk factor [31],-[33] and those practices are standard in Roma as a consequence of inadequate sanitary conditions [15]. Also, use of the woods for heating, that are contaminated with soil, through which people come in contact with parasites, influences the high prevalence of some endoparasites [20]. It appears that Roma with low incomes or unemployed more often consume home-made meat products and are therefore more prone to get Trichinella infection [20], although another study on its prevalence among Roma detected no significant difference compared to non-Roma [24]. Interestingly, although echinococcosis is transmitted through the same routes as other soil-transmitted helminths that are highly prevalent among Roma, this parasite does not affect Roma more often than the general population [23,24],
Preventive healthcare measures should be implemented in order to minimalize the risk of zoonotic diseases among Roma. Most of the risk factors are associated with poor hygiene and low socioeconomic standards, that also influence more common contact with infected animals or contaminated soil. Therefore, measures should aim better hygiene, access to clean water, improvement of sewage systems and better veterinary care for animals that live in settlements. Education about risks for infection and how to avoid them should be included in prevention plans.

Conclusions

Parasitic zoonoses are common among Roma population. Cryptosporidiosis, toxoplasmosis, giardiasis, and infection with STHs affect Roma more often than the general population, and Roma children are especially vulnerable. The main reasons for high occurrence of zoonoses are poor hygiene and close contact with infected animals. Preventive measures need to be taken in order to minimalize the burden of parasitic zoonoses among Roma population.

Author Contributions

LB, TVC, LB and AM made contributions to the conception, design and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

None to declare.

Conflicts of Interest

none to declare.

References

  1. Karesh, W.B.; Dobson, A.; Lloyd-Smith, J.O.; et al. Ecology of zoonoses: Natural and unnatural histories. Lancet. 2012, 380, 1936–1945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Taylor, L.H.; Latham, S.M.; Woolhouse, M.E. Risk factors for human disease emergence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001, 356, 983–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. UN environment programme. Preventing the next pandemic - zoonotic diseases and how to break the chain of transmission. 2020. Available online: https://reliefweb.isnt/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/ ZP.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2020).
  4. EURoma. EURoma Report - Roma and the structural funds. 2010. Available online: https://www.euromanet.eu/wp- content/uploads/2018/02/Mid-term-report-Roma-and- the-Structural-Funds_2010_EN.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2020).
  5. Mendizabal, I.; Lao, O.; Marigorta, U.M.; et al. Reconstructing the population history of European Romani from genome-wide data. Curr Biol. 2012, 22, 2342–2349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Font-Porterias, N.; Arauna, L.R.; Poveda, A.; et al. European Roma groups show complex West Eurasian admixture footprints and a common South Asian genetic origin. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. Roma holocaust remembrance has lessons for Europe today. 2020. Available online: https://fra.europa.eu/en/news/2020/roma-holocaust- remembrance-has-lessons-europe-today (accessed on 11 July 2021).
  8. Tombat, K.; van Dijk, J.P. Roma health: An overview of communicable diseases in Eastern and Central Europe. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020, 17, 7632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights. The situation of Roma in 11 EU Member States - survey results at a glance. 2012. Available online: https://fra.europa.eu/sites/default/files/fra_uploads/20 99-FRA-2012-Roma-at-a-glance_EN.pdf (accessed on 18 November 2020).
  10. Pipiková, J.; Papajová, I.; Šoltys, J.; Schusterová, I. Occurrence of the most common helminth infections among children in the Eastern Slovak Republic. Public Health. 2017, 150, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Antolová, D.; Janičko, M.; Halánová, M.; et al. Exposure to Toxoplasma gondii in the Roma and non-Roma inhabitants of Slovakia: A cross-sectional seroprevalence study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018, 15, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Sepkowitz, K.A. Health of the world's Roma population. Lancet. 2006, 367, 1707–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hasajová, A.; Valenčáková, A.; Malčeková, B.; et al. Significantly higher occurrence of Cryptosporidium infection in Roma children compared with non-Roma children in Slovakia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014, 33, 1401–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Matyˇsák, P.; Ilnicka, R.M. Social problems in the Roma community in the Slovak Republic. Clin Soc Work Health Interv. 2015, 1, 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  15. Rudohradská, P.; Halánová, M.; Ravaszová, P.; et al. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in children from minority group with low hygienic standards in Slovakia. Helminthologia. 2012, 49, 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Štrkolcova, G.; Mravcova, K.; Barbušinova, E.; Mucha, R.; Varady, M. Goldova M. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in children living in various living conditions in Slovakia. J Perinatol Child Health. 2019, 3, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Štrkolcová, G.; Goldová, M.; Bocková, E.; Mojžišová, J. The roundworm Strongyloides stercoralis in children, dogs, and soil inside and outside a segregated settlement in Eastern Slovakia: Frequent but hardly detectable parasite. Parasitol Res. 2017, 116, 891–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Halánová, M.; Valenčáková, A.; Malčeková, B.; et al. Occurrence of microsporidia as emerging pathogens in Slovak Roma children and their impact on public health. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013, 20, 695–698. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fecková, M.; Antolová, D.; Janičko, M.; et al. The cross- sectional study of Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence in selected groups of population in Slovakia. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2020, 65, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Antolová, D.; Jarčuška, P.; Janičko, M.; et al. Seroprevalence of human Toxocara infections in the Roma and non- Roma populations of Eastern Slovakia: A cross-sectional study. Epidemiol Infect. 2015, 143, 2249–2258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Fecková, M.; Antolová, D.; Zaleśny, G.; et al. Seroepidemiology of human toxocariasis in selected population groups in Slovakia: A cross-sectional study. J Infect Public Health. 2020, 13, 1107–1111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pipíková, J.; Papajová, I.; Šoltýs, J.; Schusterová, I.; Kočišová, D.; Toháthyová, A. Segregated settlements present an increased risk for the parasite infections spread in Northeastern Slovakia. Helminthologia. 2017, 54, 199–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Antolova, D.; Jarčuška, P.; Maničko, M.; et al. Occurrence of Echinococcus multilocularis and E. granulosus seropositivity in Roma and non-Roma population of Eastern Slovakia. Ann Parasitol. 2016, 62 (Suppl. 14). [Google Scholar]
  24. Antolová, D.; Halánová, M.; Janičko, M.; et al. A community-based study to estimate the seroprevalence of trichinellosis and echinococcosis in the Roma and non- Roma population of Slovakia. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018, 15, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Neghina, R.; Neghina, A.M.; Marincu, I. Trichinellosis in hospitalized patients from a Romanian endemic area, 2007-2009. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012, 18, 86–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. European Commission: Roma Health Report. 2014. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/social_de terminants/docs/2014_roma_health_report_en.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2021).
  27. Didier, E.S.; Stovall, M.E.; Green, L.C.; Brindley, P.J.; Sestak, K.; Didier, P.J. Epidemiology of microsporidiosis: Sources and modes of transmission. Vet Parasitol. 2004, 126, 145–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. World Health Organization. Soil-transmitted helminth infections. 2020. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact- sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections (accessed on 18 November 2020).
  29. Dubey, J.P.; Jones, J.L. Toxoplasma gondii infection in humans and animals in the United States. Int J Parasitol. 2008, 38, 1257–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sroka, J.; Wojcik-Fatla, A.; Szymanska, J.; Dutkiewicz, J.; Zajac, V.; Zwolinski, J. The occurrence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in people and animals from rural environment of Lublin region - estimate of potential role of water as a source of infection. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2010, 17, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  31. Horne, S.; Sibal, B.; Sibal, N.; Green, H.K. Cryptosporidium outbreaks: Identification, diagnosis, and management. Br J Gen Pract. 2017, 67, 425–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Studenicová, C.; Bencaiová, G.; Holková, R. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in a healthy population from Slovakia. Eur J Intern Med. 2006, 17, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Soil- transmitted helminths. 2020. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/sth/index.html (accessed on 18 November 2020).
Table 1. Parasitoses in the European Roma population.
Table 1. Parasitoses in the European Roma population.
Germs 11 00418 i001
Germs 11 00418 i002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bajkovec, L.; Vilibic-Cavlek, T.; Barbic, L.; Mrzljak, A. Parasitic Zoonoses in the Roma Population. GERMS 2021, 11, 418-426. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2021.1279

AMA Style

Bajkovec L, Vilibic-Cavlek T, Barbic L, Mrzljak A. Parasitic Zoonoses in the Roma Population. GERMS. 2021; 11(3):418-426. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2021.1279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bajkovec, Lucija, Tatjana Vilibic-Cavlek, Ljubo Barbic, and Anna Mrzljak. 2021. "Parasitic Zoonoses in the Roma Population" GERMS 11, no. 3: 418-426. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2021.1279

APA Style

Bajkovec, L., Vilibic-Cavlek, T., Barbic, L., & Mrzljak, A. (2021). Parasitic Zoonoses in the Roma Population. GERMS, 11(3), 418-426. https://doi.org/10.18683/germs.2021.1279

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop