Next Article in Journal
Improving the Performance of Entities in the Mining Industry by Optimizing Green Business Processes and Emission Inventories
Next Article in Special Issue
Simulation Study on Gas Holdup of Large and Small Bubbles in a High Pressure Gas–Liquid Bubble Column
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of a High-Pressure Submerged Jet Using a Cavitation Model Considering Effects of Shear Stress
Previous Article in Special Issue
Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation of Gas–Solid Hydrodynamics in a Bubbling Fluidized-Bed Reactor: Effects of Air Distributor, Viscous and Drag Models
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Comparison of Surface Tension Models for the Volume of Fluid Method

Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), 7491 Trondheim, Norway
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2019, 7(8), 542;
Received: 24 July 2019 / Revised: 12 August 2019 / Accepted: 13 August 2019 / Published: 15 August 2019
With the increasing use of Computational Fluid Dynamics to investigate multiphase flow scenarios, modelling surface tension effects has been a topic of active research. A well known associated problem is the generation of spurious velocities (or currents), arising due to inaccuracies in calculations of the surface tension force. These spurious currents cause nonphysical flows which can adversely affect the predictive capability of these simulations. In this paper, we implement the Continuum Surface Force (CSF), Smoothed CSF and Sharp Surface Force (SSF) models in OpenFOAM. The models were validated for various multiphase flow scenarios for Capillary numbers of 10 3 –10. All the surface tension models provide reasonable agreement with benchmarking data for rising bubble simulations. Both CSF and SSF models successfully predicted the capillary rise between two parallel plates, but Smoothed CSF could not provide reliable results. The evolution of spurious current were studied for millimetre-sized stationary bubbles. The results shows that SSF and CSF models generate the least and most spurious currents, respectively. We also show that maximum time step, mesh resolution and the under-relaxation factor used in the simulations affect the magnitude of spurious currents. View Full-Text
Keywords: surface tension modelling; VOF; rising bubbles; capillary rise surface tension modelling; VOF; rising bubbles; capillary rise
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Vachaparambil, K.J.; Einarsrud, K.E. Comparison of Surface Tension Models for the Volume of Fluid Method. Processes 2019, 7, 542.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

Back to TopTop