Next Article in Journal
Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles (ZnO NPs), Biosynthesis, Characterization and Evaluation of Their Impact to Improve Shoot Growth and to Reduce Salt Toxicity on Salvia officinalis In Vitro Cultivated
Previous Article in Journal
Design and Experiment of a Helicoidal Seed Tube to Improve Seed Distribution Uniformity of Seed Drills
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Compound Additives on Sulfur Fixing Performance of Sorbent Based on Steel Slag at High Temperatures

1
School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2
Heilongjiang Forestry Vocation-Technical College, Mudanjiang 157011, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(7), 1272; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071272
Submission received: 9 May 2022 / Revised: 21 June 2022 / Accepted: 26 June 2022 / Published: 28 June 2022

Abstract

:
Steel slag is modified with additives to improve its high-temperature sulfur-fixing performance. The effects of sodium lignosulfonate, NaCl, KNO3 and MnO2 on the sulfur fixing performance of steel slag were explored after the ideal calcium–sulfur ratio of steel slag was established to be 2.5. An orthogonal experiment was used to explore the primary and secondary impacts of different additives on the sulfur fixing efficiency. The optimal factor level combination was identified to be 8% sodium lignosulfonate, 1% NaCl, 5% MnO2, and 7% KNO3, with a maximum sulfur fixing efficiency of 70.81%. According to XRF analysis, the sulfur-fixing effect of steel slag with additives was clearly superior to that of steel slag without additives. According to an XRD analysis, the diffraction peak of sulfur-fixing products of steel slag with additives was significantly improved, resulting in a high-temperature resistant phase that prevented sulfur-fixing products from degrading. According to SEM research, the steel slag with additives produced an interface that was conducive to gas–solid interaction in the sulfur fixation process, and sulfur fixed ash of modified steel slag exhibited the surface morphology of a high temperature resistant phase.

1. Introduction

Coal is used in large quantities, releasing nitrogen oxides and sulfur oxides in the power, building materials, iron and steel, and chemical industries. With the shift in economic development mode and the promotion of energy conservation and emission reduction, demand for coal has slowed, but pollution from coal-consuming companies remains severe [1]. The use of sulfur fixing agents [2] is a key coal combustion technique for controlling SO2 emissions [3]. The development of low-cost and efficient sulfur-fixing agents for coal combustion is an important research area in clean coal technology.
Commonly used sulfur fixing agents [4,5] are CaCO3 [6,7], Ca(OH)2 and CaO [8], and non-calcium-based sulfur fixing agents have limited application in coal combustion sulfur fixing due to high prices. Calcium-containing solid waste, such as calcium carbide slag, red mud [9], white mud, fly ash, steel slag, etc. as sulfur fixing agents, is an effective way to utilize the resource of solid waste [10], and the development of alkali-based industrial solid waste [11] as a sulfur fixing agent can reduce the cost of sulfur fixing agent and reduce the land occupation of waste and environmental pollution [12]. Calcium-based sulfur fixing agents and solid waste used directly as a sulfur fixing agent, due to high temperature sintering and the decomposition of sulfur fixing products, lead to a low calcium utilization rate.
Auxiliary agents can increase the surface characteristics and pore structure of sulfur-fixing agents, as well as delay and limit the decomposition of sulfur-fixing products [13]. They can also catalyze sulfur-fixing reactions and combustion. Sulfur-fixing additives such as NaCl and Na2CO3 are frequently used to modify sulfur-fixing agents [14], and sodium salts can form a low eutectic with calcium-based sulfur-fixing agents to promote ionic diffusion of reactants, which facilitates the formation of high surface area pores and improves sulfur-fixing agent reaction activity. Metal oxides, such as CeO2, TiO2, MnO2, CuO and others [15], are used as additives in calcium-based sulfur-fixing agents in the coal combustion sulfur-fixing reaction process, not only to promote the sulfur-fixing reaction but also to improve fuel efficiency [16].
Steel slag is a type of industrial solid waste produced during the manufacturing of steel. Steel slag, as a solid waste, depletes land resources and pollutes the environment [17,18]. Steel slag is primarily used in road construction, building materials [19], cement production [20], and agriculture. Steel slag is used as an aggregate in asphalt mixtures for road construction, and steel slag powder is used as a hot melt in ceramic products and water treatment agents [21], and also as a soil conditioner [22,23]. Steel slag consumption has steadily shifted from crude to fine resource use in recent years, indicating a trend [24,25].
Steel slag is primarily composed of CaO, SiO2, MgO, Al2O3, FeO, MnO, and other elements [26,27]. Steel slag is high in CaO and MgO, and finely ground steel slag powder slurry has a high alkalinity and is commonly used as a wet flue gas desulfurization absorber [28]. To increase the sulfur-fixing efficiency and reactivity, as well as to limit the sintering and decomposition of sulfur-fixing products in the high temperature sulfur-fixing process, the use of steel slag as a sulfur-fixing agent for coal combustion requires additive modification. In this paper, the use of additive-modified steel slag as a coal-fired sulfur-fixing agent to enhance the chemical activity of steel slag provides a new utilization value for steel slag, replacing traditional calcium-based sulfur-fixing agents such as limestone and thus saving mineral resources. This paper uses orthogonal experimental design to optimize the additive ratio and determine the maximum sulfur fixing efficiency and examines the high-temperature sulfur-fixing efficiency of steel slag and the sulfur-fixing mechanism of modified steel slag.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sulfur Fixation Experiment

The experimental coal samples were chosen from Taiyuan coal, and the proximate analysis of coal samples is presented in Table 1. The coal samples were ground to less than 75 µm and left aside; the steel slag was ground to less than 75 µm and set aside (Table 2). As sulfur-fixing additives, KNO3, NaCl, MnO2, and sodium lignosulfonate were used. A certain amount of sulfur-fixing additives and steel slag was ground and mixed, and then according to a certain calcium–sulfur mole ratio, the Taiyuan coal was ground and mixed and put into a porcelain boat in a tube furnace and was rapidly heated to 1000 °C. The air compressor was started to pass a 2.5 L·min−1 flow of air, and was pushed into the combustion boat with the mixed coal samples, heated for 20 min, then taken out of the combustion boat for cooling. The sulfur fixation experiments were completed and the sulfur fixation ash was obtained. The sulfur fixation process is shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Determination of Sulfur-Fixing Efficiency

The determination of sulfur in ash was performed using the GB/T215-2003 methodology to investigate sulfate sulfur concentration. The exact procedure for determining the mass of BaSO4 was as follows: the ash was wetted and mixed with a certain concentration of concentrated hydrochloric acid and then boiled before being filtered to obtain the filtrate. The filtrate was transformed into barium sulfate precipitate, and was then filtered to obtain the filter paper with the precipitate. The filter paper was put in the muffle furnace to obtain the BaSO4 precipitate; the mass of BaSO4 was then weighed and calculated. The sulfur-fixing efficiency was calculated by dividing the mass of sulfur in the ash by the mass of sulfur in the matching coal sample, using the formula below:
η = m 1 × w 1 m 0 × w s × 100 ,
where, η is the sulfur fixation efficiency, %; m1 is the mass of BaSO4 precipitation measured, g; m0 is the mass of raw coal, g; w1 is the mass fraction of sulfur in BaSO4, %; wS is the sulfur content of raw coal, %.

2.3. Instruments for Experimentation and Analysis

A silent oil-free air compressor (TYW-1), a high temperature combustion tube furnace (SRJK-2-13), a muffle furnace (SX2), an electronic analytical balance (BSA124S), an industrial analyzer (MAC-400), and other items were made available.
X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy was used to determine the major elemental compositions of steel slag and tempered modified steel slag sulfur-fixing ash (XRF, PFX-235, Thermo, USA). X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’Pert Pro, PANalytical B.V., Holland) was used to study the primary crystalline phases found in steel slag and sulfur fixation ash. Scanning electron microscopy was used to examine the microscopic morphology of steel slag and sulfur-fixing ash (SEM, S-4800, Hitachi, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Determination of Calcium-Sulfur Mole Ratio

The impact of the calcium–sulfur mole ratio on the sulfur-fixing efficiency of steel slag is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2 shows that the sulfur fixation efficiency rises as the calcium–sulfur ratio grows, that the sulfur fixation efficiency of steel slag is the first to develop more quickly and then tends to level out, and that the calcium–sulfur mole ratio is 2.5 after the sulfur fixation efficiency increases and slows down. Sulfur fixation efficiency attained 28% at a calcium–sulfur mole ratio of 2, and the sulfur fixation efficiency attained 43% at a calcium–sulfur mole ratio of 2.5. At a calcium–sulfur mole ratio of 4.5 sulfur fixation efficiency attained 61%. Because the calcium content of steel slag is relatively low when compared to calcium carbide slag and limestone, adding more steel slag to the coal combustion process will produce a certain amount of ash and reduce the calcium utilization rate; thus, a calcium–sulfur ratio of 2.5 was chosen for this experiment.

3.2. Effect of Single-Factor Additive

The effect of additives on the sulfur fixation performance of steel slag was explored, and the sulfur fixation performance of alkali metal oxides and salts as additives was studied, and it was discovered that sodium lignosulfonate, NaCl, KNO3, and MnO2 made a good contribution to the improvement of the sulfur fixation efficiency of steel slag. Figure 2 depicts the impact of the four additions on the slag sulfur fixing efficiency.
Figure 3 depicts the trend of numerous sulfur fixation additives on the sulfur fixation efficiency. The sulfur fixation of steel slag grows first and then drops as the concentration of KNO3, NaCl, and sodium lignosulfonate increases, while the sulfur fixation efficiency of steel slag increases more quickly and then tends to level out when the content of MnO2 increases. After high temperature melting, sodium ions in the sulfur-fixing agent surface made a eutectic formation, and the sulfur fixing agent surface ion migration and diffusion ability increased, so as to weaken and improve the sulfur-fixing agent’s high temperature sintering. This means that the sulfur-fixing agent surface lattice structure changes and the pore structure increases so that the sulfur-fixing products are not easily blocked by the pores. However, the decomposition temperature of KNO3 after heating is lower than that of NaCl, which produces oxidation fuel and provides the reactive oxygen required for the sulfur fixation reaction, and the sulfur fixation reaction is carried out in an oxygen-rich atmosphere to further oxidize the intermediate products CaS, CaSO3, etc. to sulfate. The K+ in it has the same effect as NaCl, and a certain amount of K+ also changes MnO2, which decomposes into Mn2O3 and Mn3O4 during the sulfur fixation reaction [29]; this plays a catalytic function in the sulfur fixation reaction and creates a tiny quantity of Mn3O4. Sodium lignosulfonate is put with steel slag to make its particle surface negatively charged, which provides a repulsive attraction between particles, weakening aggregation and delaying sintering, reducing the loss of specific surface area and porosity and facilitating SO2 absorption.

3.3. Optimization with Orthogonal Experiments

Steel slag was used as the sulfur-fixing agent, and sodium lignosulfonate, KNO3, NaCl, and MnO2 were used as four factors (Table 3), with four levels of each factor used to design orthogonal experiments with the sulfur fixation efficiency as the experimental index; the experimental protocol and results analysis are shown in Table 4.
A greater value of the extreme difference R indicates a greater influence of the factor on the experimental results, and vice versa for smaller values. It can be seen from the analysis of the value of the extreme difference R that the order of the factors is A > D > C > B, indicating that the influence of each factor on the performance of the steel slag is A > D > C > B. The most important is sodium lignosulfonate, followed by sodium nitrate, manganese oxide, and sodium chloride, which is rather weak. The greater the average response value k for the same factor, the higher the corresponding level number. According to the order of the influencing factors and the k value, the optimal solution is A3B1C3D4, which is 8% sodium lignosulfonate, 1% NaCl, 5% MnO2, and 7% KNO3, and the maximum value of sulfur fixation efficiency from the table of experimental solutions is 70.71%.
Three parallel coal-fired sulfur fixation verification tests were conducted using the optimum scheme of the aforementioned additive ratios, yielding an average sulfur fixation efficiency of 70.81% (70.76%, 71.03%, and 70.64%) for the modified steel slag.

3.4. Characterization and Analysis

3.4.1. XRF

The composition of the ash was determined using X-ray fluorescence analysis (XRF) on raw coal ash (F1), sulfur fixation ash of steel slag (F2), and sulfur fixation ash of modified steel slag (F3). F1, F2, and F3 are the ashes produced under the same combustion circumstances, and the calcium–sulfur ratios of F2 and F3 prior to burning are the same. Table 5 shows how the primary metal components in the sulfur-fixing ash altered with various sulfur-fixing agents and additives, as well as the sulfur concentration of F1 F2 F3. Due to its own sulfur-fixing effect, F1 contained a small amount of sulfur, and the increased sulfur content of F2 indicated a stronger sulfur-fixing effect of the slag, and the sulfur content of F3 was greater than that of F2, indicating that the additives modified the slag with a stronger sulfur fixation effect.
The mineral composition of the ash is indicated in the form of oxides in the XRF detection analysis findings. The change in CaO concentration in coal ash is significant, and when paired with the SO3 content analysis, more CaSO4 of sulfur fixation products are found in F2 and F3. The greatest percentage of SiO2 and Al2O3 is compatible with the findings of XRD analysis (Figure 4) with greater diffraction peaks in raw coal and the results of CaAl2Si2O8 formed during the sulfur fixation process. In F1, F2, and F3, K2O and Na2O as alkali metal oxides have some ionic diffusion influence on the surface crystalline structure of the sulfur fixing agent during the sulfur fixing process, weakening the sintering of the sulfur fixing agent.

3.4.2. XRD

Figure 4 shows the results of the XRD investigation of F1, F2, F3, and steel slag. F1 contains more SiO2, Al2SiO5, and Fe2O3, and the other alkaline oxides have less content without obvious characteristic peaks, as shown in Figure 4a. Combined with an XRF analysis, the ash is seen to contain a small amount of CaSO4, which is the coal’s weak sulfur fixation property, but the products are less. There were no noticeable distinguishing peaks. The steel slag includes more Ca2SiO4, Ca3SiO5, and iron oxides, as shown in Figure 4b. In combination with the study of steel slag composition in Table 2, a higher amount of CaO in steel slag occurs in the form of Ca2SiO4 and Ca3SiO5, and only a tiny fraction exists as free CaO. The sulfur fixation reaction of steel slag differs from that of a conventional calcium-based sulfur-fixing agent, and Guo [30] concluded that the sulfur-fixing activity of calcium–silicon sulfur-fixing agent is higher than that of a conventional calcium-based sulfur-fixing agent, and that the sulfur-fixing reaction rate of calcium–silicon sulfur-fixing agent is lower than that of calcium carbonate in the chemical control phase and increases rapidly in the diffusion co-efficient phase.
When comparing Figure 4c,d, the diffraction peaks of CaSO4, a sulfur fixation product, are greatly increased in F3, indicating that the auxiliary modified steel slag has better sulfur fixation ability. CaAl2Si2O8 diffraction peaks are also greatly increased, and more CaAl2Si2O8 phase may block sulfur fixation product breakdown and boost sulfur fixing rate. CaO in steel slag and coal ash may readily produce CaAl2Si2O8 with Al2SiO5 and SiO2 to avoid CaSO4 breakdown on solid sulfur products at high temperatures. The considerable quantity of CaAl2O4 mixed with SiO2 may readily generate high-temperature resistant silica-aluminate products to prevent sulfur-fixing compounds from decomposing. In the high-temperature molten system of sulfur-fixing ash and coal ash, Al2SiO5, CaAl2O4, CaAl2Si2O8, CaSO4, and CaO readily produce sulfoaluminate minerals (CaO·Al2O3·CaSO4), which are high-temperature resistant phases. Spectra include more SiO2 and Fe2O3, and Wu et al. [31]. pointed out that SiO2 and Fe2O3 play a catalytic function in the sulfur fixation process, limiting the high-temperature breakdown of CaSO4, a sulfur fixation product.

3.4.3. SEM

Figure 5 depicts SEM images of F1, F2, F3, steel slag, calcined steel slag, and calcined modified steel slag, revealing their surface morphology and microstructure. In combination with XRD and XRF analysis, Figure 5a depicts the microscopic surface morphology of raw coal ash, which is primarily a mixture of silica and alkali metal oxides, and the coal forms a characteristic loose structure due to gas release and colloidal melting during pyrolysis and combustion. Figure 5b shows a steel slag powder with many dense particles of varied sizes created by various mineral phase crystals formed by the slag during the steelmaking process. In comparison, Figure 5b,c depicts the microscopic surface morphology of steel slag created by high-temperature calcination, and it can be observed that the alkali metal oxides are redistributed on the surface with a greater specific surface area. Figure 5d shows that, following calcination, the modified steel slag extends its specific surface area even more and has a sharp crystal structure connected to the micropores, which may facilitate the sulfur fixation process’ reaction.
Figure 4e compares the ash slag formed by the steel slag after sulfur fixation to Figure 4f—the difference is not obvious, but the ash forms a smoother ablative surface similar to the hot melt at a high temperature, indicating that the steel slag with additives can redistribute the hot melt on the surface of the sulfur-fixing agent during the sulfur fixation process, which can be considered a positive effect. Rather than producing a smooth surface, Figure 4d produces a high specific surface with a sharp, porous, rough structure to promote the sulfur fixation reaction, implying that the addition of additives produced a reaction interface to aid the sulfur fixation process. According to the combined analysis of Figure 4d–f, the addition of additives to the slag provides a good gas–solid reaction interface during the high-temperature sulfur fixation reaction, and the sulfur fixation process proceeds at the interface, forming a new high-temperature resistant phase to inhibit and prevent the decomposition of the sulfur fixation products.

3.5. Mechanism of Sulfur Fixation

The steel slag sulfur-fixing agent undergoes the following reactions during coal combustion.
Ca + SO 2 CaSO 3
CaSO 3 + 1 / 2 O 2 CaSO 4
Ca 2 SiO 4 + 2 SO 2 + O 2 2 CaSO 4 + SiO 2
Ca 3 SiO 5 + 3 SO 2 + 3 / 2 O 2 3 CaSO 4 + SiO 2
CaO + Al 2 O 3 CaAl 2 O 4
CaO + Al 2 O 3 + 2 SiO 2 CaAl 2 Si 2 O 8 .
Steel slag is calcined at high temperatures during coal combustion to form a microscopic structure conducive to SO2 adsorption, resulting in a certain porosity and specific surface area. The release rate and concentration of SO2, and the high temperature decomposition of sulfur fixing products, among other factors, determine the sulfur-fixing efficiency. The composite additives promote ion migration and diffusion on the steel slag surface during high temperature calcination, weaken the pore structure of the slag surface sintering at high temperature, change the crystal structure of the slag surface so that SO2 is easily adsorbed, and promote the generation of a variety of high-temperature resistant substances to coat the sulfur-fixing products and prevent high temperature decomposition. The catalytic impact of the composite additives, on the other hand, lowers the activation energy of the gas–solid interaction, making the sulfur fixation process easier to complete, and the oxidant component in the composite additives promotes complete combustion. The above analysis of the chemical reaction mechanism of sulfur fixation is a reasonable hypothesis.

4. Conclusions and Prospects

(1)
The additives have a catalytic effect on the sulfur-fixing reaction of steel slag, as well as forming a microscopic surface structure that promotes the gas–solid reaction and aids in the production of substances that inhibit the decomposition of sulfur-fixing products;
(2)
The sulfur fixation efficiency of composite additives modified steel slag is significantly increased, and the optimal amount of additives added at a 1000 °C high temperature is 8% sodium lignosulfonate, 1% NaCl, 5% MnO2, 7% KNO3, and the maximum sulfur fixation efficiency of modified steel slag can reach 70.81%;
(3)
The XRF, XRD, and SEM investigations revealed that the additive-modified steel slag had higher sulfur fixation performances than the unmodified steel slag and created a material phase that hindered sulfur fixation product breakdown at high temperatures. The surface of the modified steel slag developed morphological characteristics and a microstructure that favored gas–solid interaction;
(4)
Because the reaction activity of steel slag is low, future research should focus on finding efficient additives that can increase the sulfur fixation efficiency at low calcium–sulfur ratios. In addition, tempering steel slag and compounding steel slag with other alkali-based solid wastes should be investigated further to lower the cost of sulfur-fixing agents and increase the efficiency of sulfur fixation, allowing steel slag sulfur-fixing agents to be used in a wider range of applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z. and Q.Y.; Formal analysis, J.Z.; Funding acquisition, Q.Y.; Methodology, J.Z. and X.W.; data curation, M.L.; Writing, J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Beijing Science and Technology Plan Funding Project (Z161100002616038) and Central universities basic research business expenses special funds (2020YJSHH24).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge support from the School of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jiang, L.; He, S.; Zhou, H.; Kong, H.; Wang, J.; Cui, Y.; Wang, L. Coordination between sulfur dioxide pollution control and rapid economic growth in China: Evidence from satellite observations and spatial econometric models. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2021, 57, 279–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pang, L.; Shao, Y.J.; Zhong, W.Q.; Liu, H. Oxy-coal combustion in a 30 kW(th) pressurized fluidized bed: Effect of combustion pressure on combustion performance, pollutant emissions and desulfurization. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2021, 38, 4121–4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Meng, J.; Wang, J.; Yang, F.; Hao, Y.; Cheng, F. Effects of Sulfur-fixing Agent on Coal Combustion Characteristics and S, N Release Law in Condition of Lean Oxygen. Coal Convers. 2020, 43, 27–37. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wichliński, M.; Włodarczyk, R. Assessment of the Impact of Modification of Calcium Sorbents and the Possibility of Their Use in Desulfurization for Oxy-Fuel Combustion Process. Minerals 2021, 11, 1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chu, S.; Zhu, C.; Tompsett, G.A.; Mountziaris, T.J.; Dauenhauer, P.J. Refuse-Derived Fuel and Integrated Calcium Hydroxide Sorbent for Coal Combustion Desulfurization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 3136–3144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Pang, L.; Shao, Y.J.; Zhong, W.Q.; Liu, H. Experimental study of SO2 emissions and desulfurization of oxy-coal combustion in a 30 kW(th) pressurized fluidized bed combustor. Fuel 2020, 264, 116795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, Y.B.; Gwak, Y.R.; Keel, S.I.; Yun, J.H.; Lee, S.H. Direct desulfurization of limestones under oxy-circulating fluidized bed combustion conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 377, 119650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Luo, M.; Zhou, L.; Wang, C.; Kuang, C. The evolution and desulfurization of sulfur in chemical looping combustion of coal. Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2021, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, Y.; Zhou, F.-S.; Hu, Y.-M.; Zhang, Y.-H. Sulfur Fixation by Chemically Modified Red Mud Samples Containing Inorganic Additives: A Parametric Study. Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 2016, 9817969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zhao, G.J.; Yin, F.J.; Li, J.; Li, X.Y. Study on Pore Structure and Sulfur Fixation Characteristics of Alkali Industrial Waste. Adv. Mater. Res. 2011, 194-196, 716–721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, G.; Shi, Y.; Ni, C.; Lu, C.; Yin, F.; Wu, J.; Sheng, C. Notice of Retraction: The Influence Mechanism of Rapid Hydration Drying on Medium Temperature Sulfur Fixation Performance of Alkali Industrial Waste. In Proceedings of the 2010 4th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, Chengdu, China, 18–20 June 2010; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Guo, Y.X.; Li, Y.T.; Cheng, F.Q.; Yang, F.L. Effect of Coal Fly Ash as Additive on the Sulfur Retention of Coal Briquette. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 512–515, 1583–1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhu, G.; Deng, N. Improving the efficiency of CaO-based sorbent by SrCO3 for high-temperature sulfur removal during coal combustion. Green Processing Synth. 2017, 6, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Okura, T.; Ueda, S.; Yamaguchi, K. Elemental sulphur fixation in smelting gas; Is it feasible? Sohn Int. Symp. Adv. Processing Met. Mater. 2006, 8, 425–431. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhao, Y.; Wang, S.Q.; Shen, Y.M.; Lu, X.J. Effects of nano-TiO2 on combustion and desulfurization. Energy 2013, 56, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, S.-Q.; Liu, M.-Z.; Sun, L.-L.; Cheng, W.-L. Study on the mechanism of desulfurization and denitrification catalyzed by TiO2 in the combustion with biomass and coal. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2017, 34, 1882–1888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Brand, A.S.; Fanijo, E.O. A Review of the Influence of Steel Furnace Slag Type on the Properties of Cementitious Composites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 8210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chand, S.; Paul, B.; Kumar, M. Sustainable Approaches for LD Slag Waste Management in Steel Industries: A Review. Metallurgist 2016, 60, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, Y.; Ling, T.-C.; Shi, C.; Pan, S.-Y. Characteristics of steel slags and their use in cement and concrete—A review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 136, 187–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Weng, Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, J. Study on mathematical model of hydration expansion of steel slag-cement composite cementitious material. Environ. Technol. 2021, 42, 2776–2783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jafari, A.J.; Moslemzadeh, M. Investigation of phosphorus removal using steel slag from aqueous solutions: A systematic review study. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020, 102, 821–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Dhoble, Y.N.; Ahmed, S. Review on the innovative uses of steel slag for waste minimization. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2018, 20, 1373–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yang, L.; Wei, T.; Li, S.; Lv, Y.; Miki, T.; Yang, L.; Nagasaka, T. Immobilization persistence of Cu, Cr, Pb, Zn ions by the addition of steel slag in acidic contaminated mine soil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 412, 125176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gao, D.; Wang, F.P.; Wang, Y.T.; Zeng, Y.N. Sustainable Utilization of Steel Slag from Traditional Industry and Agriculture to Catalysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kang, L.; Du, H.L.; Zhang, H.; Ma, W.L. Systematic Research on the Application of Steel Slag Resources under the Background of Big Data. Complexity 2018, 2018, 6703908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Guo, J.; Bao, Y.; Wang, M. Steel Slag in China: Treatment, Recycling, and Management. Waste Manag. 2018, 78, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Herbelin, M.; Bascou, J.; Lavastre, V.; Guillaume, D.; Benbakkar, M.; Peuble, S.; Baron, J.P. Steel Slag Characterisation Benefit of Coupling Chemical, Mineralogical and Magnetic Techniques. Minerals 2020, 10, 705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Neveux, T.; Hagi, H.; Le Moullec, Y. Performance simulation of full-scale wet flue gas desulfurization for oxy-coal com-bustion. Energy Procedia 2014, 63, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Zhang, S.; Xie, B. Influence of MnO2 for CaO in coal powder combustion. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2012, 6, 4157–4161. [Google Scholar]
  30. Guo, F.; Wu, Z.; Cui, A.; Wang, L. Desulfurization and Kinetic Studies on CaCO3-SiO2 Complex Desulfurization Reagent. Chem. J. Chin. Univ. 2003, 1, 100–104. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu, J.; Yang, X.; Han, J.; Chen, T. Prohibition of CaSO4 decomposition at high temperature by oxides/carbonates additives. J. China Univ. Min. Technol. 2005, 4, 660–663. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of sulfur fixation equipment. a: Air compressor; b: Flow-meter; c: Tube furnace; d: Combustion boat; e: Thermocouple; f: Thermostat; g: Exhaust system.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of sulfur fixation equipment. a: Air compressor; b: Flow-meter; c: Tube furnace; d: Combustion boat; e: Thermocouple; f: Thermostat; g: Exhaust system.
Processes 10 01272 g001
Figure 2. Effect of calcium–sulfur molar ratio on sulfur-fixing efficiency.
Figure 2. Effect of calcium–sulfur molar ratio on sulfur-fixing efficiency.
Processes 10 01272 g002
Figure 3. Effect of additive content on sulfur-fixing efficiency.
Figure 3. Effect of additive content on sulfur-fixing efficiency.
Processes 10 01272 g003
Figure 4. XRD patterns of ash and steel slag. (a) F1; (b) Steel slag; (c) F2; (d) F3.
Figure 4. XRD patterns of ash and steel slag. (a) F1; (b) Steel slag; (c) F2; (d) F3.
Processes 10 01272 g004aProcesses 10 01272 g004b
Figure 5. SEM image of coal ash and steel slag. (a) Raw coal ash (b) Steel slag (c) Steel slag after calcination (d) Modified steel slag after calcination (e) F2 (f) F3.
Figure 5. SEM image of coal ash and steel slag. (a) Raw coal ash (b) Steel slag (c) Steel slag after calcination (d) Modified steel slag after calcination (e) F2 (f) F3.
Processes 10 01272 g005
Table 1. Proximate and heating value analysis of samples.
Table 1. Proximate and heating value analysis of samples.
SampleProximate Analysis wad/% Sulfur Analysis wad/% BCV/MJ·Kg−1
MAVFC *StQb,ad
Taiyuan coal1.3836.4225.9936.262.5020.188
Note: M—moisture; V—volatile; A—ash; FC—fixed carbon; BCV—bomb calorific value; ad—air dry basis; *—by difference.
Table 2. Chemical composition analysis of steel slag.
Table 2. Chemical composition analysis of steel slag.
CompositionCaOFe2O3SiO2MgOMnOAl2O3P2O5TiO2
Content/%42.8325.3416.793.523.443.151.871.40
CompositionCr2O3Na2OBaOK2OSrOWO3Ag2OZnO
Content/%0.4860.1990.1190.07750.04730.02660.02370.0219
Table 3. Factors and levels of orthogonal experiments.
Table 3. Factors and levels of orthogonal experiments.
Levelw (Sls)/%
(A)
w (NaCl)/%
(B)
w (MnO2)/%
(C)
w (KNO3)/%
(D)
14111
26333
38555
410777
Note: Sls—Sodium lignin sulfonate.
Table 4. Orthogonal experiments plan and experiment results analysis.
Table 4. Orthogonal experiments plan and experiment results analysis.
Experiment No.ABCDSulfur Fixation Efficiency/%
1111148.78
2122250.05
3133345.25
4144450.69
5212353.46
6221455.45
7234159.01
8243259.25
9313470.71
10324355.48
11331264.56
12342153.41
13414254.54
14423154.47
15432452.21
16441351.62
k148.69256.87255.10353.917
k256.79253.86252.28257.100
k361.04055.25857.42051.453
k453.21053.74254.93057.265
R12.3483.1305.1385.812
Sequence A > D > C > B
Best scheme A3B1C3D4
Table 5. XRF analysis on coal ash.
Table 5. XRF analysis on coal ash.
Ash Samplew (SiO2)/%w (Al2O3)/%w (Fe2O3)/%w (CaO)/%w (K2O)/%w (TiO2)/%w (SO3)/
%
w (MgO)/%w (Na2O)/%w (MnO)/%
F152.6330.629.202.151.641.290.8860.8010.2310.0418
F234.5520.3317.7318.050.9451.252.931.270.2961.46
F330.8217.6317.3118.952.461.214.831.471.413.75
Note: w—Mass fraction.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, J.; Yang, Q.; Wen, X.; Li, M. Influence of Compound Additives on Sulfur Fixing Performance of Sorbent Based on Steel Slag at High Temperatures. Processes 2022, 10, 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071272

AMA Style

Zhao J, Yang Q, Wen X, Li M. Influence of Compound Additives on Sulfur Fixing Performance of Sorbent Based on Steel Slag at High Temperatures. Processes. 2022; 10(7):1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071272

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Jianbing, Qiaowen Yang, Xin Wen, and Meihui Li. 2022. "Influence of Compound Additives on Sulfur Fixing Performance of Sorbent Based on Steel Slag at High Temperatures" Processes 10, no. 7: 1272. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10071272

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop