Next Article in Journal
An Improved Line-Up Competition Algorithm for Unrelated Parallel Machine Scheduling with Setup Times
Previous Article in Journal
Smart and Resilient Transformation of Manufacturing Firms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Processes
Volume 10
Issue 12
10.3390/pr10122675
Review Report
processes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Solid-State Fermentation from Organic Wastes: A New Generation of Bioproducts

Processes 2022, 10(12), 2675; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122675
by Nicolás Oiza 1, Javier Moral-Vico 1, Antoni Sánchez 1,*, Edgar Ricardo Oviedo 2 and Teresa Gea 1
Reviewer 1:
Ali Partovinia
Reviewer 2:
Hüseyin Can
Reviewer 3:
Niyaz Mohammad Mahmoodi
Processes 2022, 10(12), 2675; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10122675
Submission received: 7 November 2022 / Revised: 6 December 2022 / Accepted: 11 December 2022 / Published: 12 December 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Biological Processes and Systems)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript, entitled "Solid-state fermentation from organic wastes: a new generation of bioproducts" has presented a review on SSF process to produce biological products. The present manuscript can't be considered for publication except major revision. The detailed comments are listed as follows.

 -        In the introduction section, it is necessary to state that the production of biological products is carried out by two methods of submerged fermentation and SSF and also what are the advantages and disadvantages of these approaches.

-        Authors must provide a comparative table regarding the production rate, yield or productivity with two SMF and SSF techniques and a quantitative comparison between these two methods. Only qualitative information is expressed in the tables 1-3. The superficial statements are also presented for Tables.

 -        Page 3. Line 86. “It can also be observed that fungi have a predominant role in SSF” Please explain the reason why fungi are more used. Could this issue be caused by the better growth of fungal hyphae on solid substrates as well as better mass transfer?

 -        Page 6. Line 201. please remove “Unfortunately, the reasons why one given waste works better than others are not unraveled yet.” It is unclear statement.

 -        Manufacturing of biofuels as the important bio-products through solid state fermentation is missing from the manuscript.

 -        “Conclusion” section should be replaced by “conclusions and future perspectives”. For instance, “In future, the application of SSF process could be developed …”.

Author Response

Reply to Reviewer 1

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Accept in present form

Author Response

Reply to Reviewer 2

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

 

Comments:

0. Moderate revision. 1. The novelty of this study should be inserted in the text clearly. 2. The advantages and disadvantages of this study should be investigated. 3. The mechanism of Solid-state fermentation from organic wastes should be studied in detail.   4. The stability of the generated bioproducts should be presented.        

 

Author Response

Reply to Reviewer 3

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper has been modified based on the raised comments, and now, it could be accepted for publication.

Reviewer 3 Report

Accept

Back to TopTop