Next Article in Journal
Biomarkers in Early Response to Brolucizumab on Pigment Epithelium Detachment Associated with Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Previous Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicles of Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Therapeutic Properties Discovered with Extraordinary Success
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

The Role of the Bisphenol A in Diabetes and Obesity

SONEV Research Group, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir, C/Quevedo nº 2, 46001 Valencia, Spain
School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir, C/Quevedo nº 2, 46001 Valencia, Spain
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2021, 9(6), 666;
Received: 14 May 2021 / Revised: 4 June 2021 / Accepted: 8 June 2021 / Published: 10 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)


Bisphenol A is a compound commonly found in products meant for daily use. It was one of the first compounds to be identified as an endocrine disruptor that was capable of disrupting the endocrine system and producing very similar effects to those of metabolic syndrome. It has recently gained popularity in the scientific arena as a risk factor for obesity and diabetes due to its ability to imitate natural oestrogens and bind to their receptors. The aim was to study the possible relationship between the Bisphenol A endocrine disruptor with diabetes and obesity. The analysis of the articles allows us to conclude that Bisphenol A is an additional risk factor to consider in the development of diabetes and obesity, since it is capable of stimulating the hypertrophy of adipocytes and altering the endocrine system by mimicking the effects of the oestrogen molecule, since epidemiological studies carried out have suggested that the same disruptions seen in experimental studies on animals can be found in humans; however, despite many countries having developed policies to limit exposure to this disruptor in their populations, there is a lack of international agreement. Understanding its relationship with obesity and diabetes will help to raise awareness in the population and adopt public health campaigns to prevent exposure—especially among young people—to these substances.

1. Introduction

Obesity is a chronic metabolic disease affecting people of all ages and is one of the 21st century’s major public health problems, which the WHO considers to be an epidemic that affects both adults and the child-youth population [1]. Increased calorie consumption and decreased physical activity are the main risk factors in developing obesity. However, this imbalance between energy intake and expenditure should not be considered the only reasons for the large increase in obesity rates we find today. As with other chronic health problems, obesity and being overweight are the result of a complex interaction between genetic, behavioural, and environmental factors. While evidence is strong for some of these contributors, for others, it is still emerging. The massive marketing and consumption of foods that are high in calories and a lack of physical activity are accepted as the main culprits for this epidemic, although we must remain sceptical and not assume that they are the only ones or that they are sufficient to explain it adequately.
Many studies that link calorie consumption with obesity are based on subjective questionnaires completed by the study’s participants themselves and have been shown to be inaccurate on numerous occasions, mainly due to reporting errors and the variation in calorie intake from one day to another [2]. In 2015, experts from the Energy Balance Measurement Working Group published a study [3] whereby they concluded that future studies should have these subjective questionnaires replaced or linked to other more objective methods such as the measurement of biomarkers, as many of them have been linked to obesity. For example, some hormones, such as leptin or resistin, cytokines, such as visfatin, or plasma proteins, such as haptoglobin, have been shown to be good predictors for the level of adiposity. On the other hand, good predictors for obesity and insulin resistance are C-reactive protein, sialic acid, plasminogen activation inhibitor 1, and the Von Willebrand factor [4]. Biological markers are currently increasingly used because they have been shown to be more accurate than questionnaires [5].
Since the theory that the imbalance between calorie contribution and intake is not enough in explaining the current high rates of obesity, there is increasing evidence to support the hypothesis that environmental chemicals around us—particularly those that are capable of interacting with the endocrine system—known as endocrine disruptors (ED), are an additional risk factor to take into account [6,7]. Bisphenol A or BPA was one of the first compounds to be identified as an obesogenic endocrine disruptor along with pesticides, heavy metals, and polychlorinated bisphenols (PCBs). BPA is considered an ED due to its ability to act as an oestrogen in some tissues [8,9].
Several international organisations have defined endocrine disruptors, but the most widely used definition seems to be that by the European Union, which indicates that an ED is an “exogenous substance that causes adverse health effects in an intact organism, or its progeny, secondary to changes in endocrine function” [10]. Due to its ability to secrete adipokines, adipose tissue is considered an endocrine organ and may be the target of EDs.
Most EDs are man-made compounds—they can be found in food, everyday products, or the environment—and are capable of accumulating in the human body [9,11]. Understanding the relationship between EDs and obesity would help to raise awareness in the population and the adoption of public health campaigns to prevent exposure to these substances, especially among the youngest in society, given that several recent epidemiological studies suggest that rapid weight gain during childhood could be related to maternal or early extrauterine life of the newborn exposure to ED [12,13,14,15,16].
Numerous epidemiological studies have found a positive link between BPA levels in urine and obesity and diabetes in adults [15,16] and in children [17,18]. Most epidemiological studies into the relationship between BPA and obesity or diabetes do so through levels of this compound found in urine, as BPA is not stored in the body; it has a half-life of six hours and is excreted in urine [19]. The issue with epidemiological studies in this context is that most studied the relationship of each ED individually without giving consideration to people being exposed to several different EDs and that they may interact with each other or with other factors. This is why this literature review focuses on articles that study the mechanisms of this relationship, trying to analyse how BPA disrupts glucose metabolism and insulin resistance to clarify the true role of BPA in the development of obesity and diabetes.

1.1. Epidemiology of Obesity and Diabetes

The prevalence of obesity has been increasing steadily since the mid-20th century, accelerating rapidly since the 1980s [20]. In the most developed countries, this increase has occurred across a large part of the population, including a great variety of ages, races, sex, and socio-economic levels [20,21]. The number of overweight or obese youths has tripled in the last three decades, increasing faster than obesity rates in adults in most countries [22]. It is currently estimated that 8% of children between 4 and 5 years old in the United States are overweight according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a research programme carried out by the National Center for Health Statistics [20].
In Spain, obesity rates are one of the highest according to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). One in three children between the ages of 13 and 14 is overweight, and one in six adults is obese [20,23]. According to the most recent data from the 2017 National Health Survey, the obesity rate in men has multiplied by 2.3 and in women by 2.4 in the last 30 years; increasing from 7.9% to 18.2% and from 6.9% to 16.7% of the population, respectively. Regarding the figures of those who are overweight, the difference between men and women is much greater: 44.31% in men compared to 30.04% in women in 2017 [24]. As well as the high prevalence rates, it has been witnessed that disorders associated with obesity, such as metabolic syndrome, a precursor to type 2 diabetes, are already present early in life [25]. There is also evidence that childhood obesity is a precursor to obesity in adulthood [26].
Diabetes is a chronic disease that occurs when the pancreas does not produce enough insulin or when the body does not use the insulin effectively. The effect of uncontrolled diabetes is hyperglycaemia (increased blood sugar), which over time seriously damages many organs and systems, especially nerves and blood vessels [27,28]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) is the most frequent form of presentation, accounting for 90% of the total cases. Type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) cases represent 5 to 10% of total cases and the remaining percentage corresponds to other forms of presentation. The prevalence is increasing rapidly due to the improvement in life expectancy and changes in lifestyle habits [28,29]. In 2014, this disease was suffered by 8.5% of adults and 1.6 million individuals died from diabetes. Since then, its prevalence has increased most significantly in low- and middle-income countries. In 2018, the global prevalence of DM2 among adults was approximately 415 million, but according to projections from the International Diabetes Federation, it is expected to reach 642 million by 2040 [30,31].

1.2. Bisphenol A

Bisphenol A or BPA is what is known as a xenoestrogen, an endocrine disruptor that interferes with the endocrine system by imitating the effects of natural oestrogens and that is able to keep the endocrine system in a constant state of flux given that they are widely incorporated in many areas of modern society today. Due to its ability to disrupt the endocrine system, developmental periods, including the prenatal period and infancy, are critical periods in terms of sensitivity to the effects of BPA [32]. It belongs to the chemical group of phenols and is a synthetic compound made up of polycarbonate polymer units and epoxy resins. It is widely used in a wide variety of products—plastic, aluminium, or polycarbonate containers—and has an oestrogenic action [33]. Animal and human research has associated BPA with many health problems, including infertility, weight gain, behavioural changes, early-onset puberty, prostate and mammary gland cancers, cardiovascular effects, obesity, and diabetes [34,35].

1.2.1. Oestrogenic Characteristics of BPA

BPA has a characteristic structure that gives it the ability to mimic oestrogens by binding to their receptors. It is formed by two groups of hydroxy-phenols connected to a carbon atom with the formula (CH3)2C(C6H4OH)2 (Figure 1) and it is specifically in the hydroxy-external groups that it is similar to the oestrogenic molecule 17β-oestradiol (E2). BPA has a mass of 228.3 Da, while oestrogen has a mean mass of 272.4 Da [36].
Until relatively recently, BPA was considered a weak oestrogen. In some studies from 2003, the response of animal tissue to the presence of BPA was 10,000 to 100,000 times less potent than that produced by oestrogen [8,37]. However, more recently it has been possible to see the mechanisms at the molecular level by which BPA can elicit a response in cells at very low concentrations due to its binding to the nuclear oestrogen receptors alpha (ER-α) and beta (ER-β) [38]. Although this binding is relatively weak, around two times less potent than a physiological oestrogen molecule, the fact that exposure to BPA is chronic and continuous must be taken into account [39]. BPA, however, as with other xenoestrogens, is capable of displacing radioactively labelled oestrogen from both its ER-α and ER-β [39]. Other authors have studied different mechanisms by which BPA could exert its endocrine disruptor activity. These mechanisms occur by means of signalling pathways that are bound to membrane and non-nuclear receptors, such as those previously discussed [38,40].
Alonso-Magdalena et al. [41] showed how pancreatic cells react in a similar way when exposed to similar concentrations of environmental BPA or to physiological concentrations of oestrogen. BPA regulates the concentration of pancreatic insulin through a mechanism that involves the activation of ER-α and they, therefore, concluded that environmental BPA produces the same response as endogenous oestrogen in pancreatic cells. Another important conclusion they made is that ER-α is the main receptor involved in regulating insulin content for BPA and oestrogen. Other work carried out several years later also found a similar response in vivo when treating mice with small doses of BPA for four days and—after this time—finding increased insulin in pancreatic cells with this response also being dependent on ER-α [42].
Due to the discovery of the effects BPA has on health, there are alternatives today, such as bisphenol AF (BPAF), bisphenol B (BPB), bisphenol F (BPF), bisphenol S (BPS), and 4-cumylphenol (HPP). These compounds are gradually replacing BPA in some plastics. In any case, there are still only a few studies regarding the effect of these compounds on the endocrine system, but these analogues have already been found in various food products, such as juices, dairy products, oils, and fish, among others, using the high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) [43]. Conversely, some studies have confirmed that they do have oestrogenic activity in vitro, and that, consequently, it is possible that they can disrupt the endocrine system in a manner similar to that of BPA [44,45,46].

1.2.2. Sources and Levels of Exposure to BPA in Humans

The main sources of exposure to BPA include water bottles, food packaging, infant feeding bottles, toys, thermal paper, household appliances, dental materials, and medical equipment [11,47,48,49,50]. A recent paper [51] has published an extensive list of products that contain BPA, grouping them into food/beverages, electronic equipment, paper products, textile samples, electrical equipment, medical devices, and other.
Despite its rapid elimination, the pervasive presence of BPA in our environment means that humans are continuously exposed to it. Metabolic disorders or dysfunctions caused in adipocytes have been described in animal studies and epidemiological studies as well as in vitro studies and, although the capacity this substance may have to disrupt the endocrine system is increasing, disagreement between researchers continues. Furthermore, the effects of BPA on obesity are not only measured using BMI but also in the effects it produces on lipids, glucose, and adipose tissue.
Several studies have shown that BPA migrates from food and drink containers to the contents [47,52,53]. The Canadian Food Research Division found concentrations of BPA in all canned non-alcoholic drinks, but not in those in glass containers, indicating that BPA migration from the container to the content is higher in canned drinks [47]. Goodson et al. [52] established that BPA migration from aluminium containers to drinks occurs during the processing time and does not increase once this process is finished, which seems to indicate that BPA residues are capable of passing to the content of the container at high temperatures such as those that occur during the processing time but not at room temperature once this stage has completed.
In addition to contamination by mouth, another well-known source of BPA is heat-sensitive paper, which is used for purchase receipts in supermarkets, shops or cash machines. Several articles have shown that the BPA present in this material could be transferred to the skin when held for no more than 5 s and that it remains detectable after 2 h, indicating its passage to under the skin [54,55].
Humans are constantly exposed to BPA at such a level that it can be considered an environmental factor. With more than 2.7 million tonnes of BPA produced in 2003 and 4.5 million in 2015, BPA is one of the most abundant environmental chemicals [38]. BPA production is increasing the fastest in East Asia—predominantly China—with a trend from 59% in 2010 to 68% in 2015. However, the trend has been decreasing in Europe from 32% in 2010 to 25% in 2015. A similar trend is seen in the United States with consumption down from 28% in 2010 to 18% in 2015 [56].
BPA concentrations of 11.2 ng mL−1 have been detected in urine in the placenta [57], 4.4 ng mL−1 in the umbilical cord [58], 8.3 ng mL−1 in amniotic fluid [59], 3.4 ng mL−1 in the colostrum, and 7.3 ng mL−1 in breast milk [60]. These findings are proof that BPA concentrations transfer from mother to child, either through the placenta or breast milk. Another source of newborns’ exposure to BPA is through baby bottles. A study carried out by Brede et al. [61] showed that all the newly purchased bottles released small concentrations of BPA of between 0.11 to 0.43 µg−1 into water and that after about 50 washes, they found BPA levels that were higher than the first time with concentrations varying between 3.7 and 17 µg−1. Taking into account that BPA exposure in the general population is virtually unavoidable due to its wide-ranging presence in the plastics of food containers or water bottles, measures should be taken to limit their exposure, especially to children and pregnant women. Many countries in Europe are trying to reduce exposure by banning the use of BPA in food packaging. As an example, there is a new law in France that will ban the use of plastics in contact with food in all school canteens [62].
After several studies showed the harmful effects of BPA during the earliest stages of life, France banned the use of BPA from the plastics used in baby bottles. This ban was later extended to all of Europe and many countries took steps to limit the use of BPA in food packaging, especially after the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) defined the maximum limit for BPA intake at 4 µg/kg of body weight per day [63]. However, not all countries have taken similar measures. In the USA, for example, although the use of BPA in baby bottles was banned, an evaluation project published in 2014 reported that the dose at which no related side effects derived from BPA were observed was 5 mg/kg of body weight per day [64]. Therefore, despite many health authorities in the world enacting policies to limit exposure to BPA in their populations, especially in children, there is a certain lack of international agreement regarding the non-harmful limit of exposure to BPA. This disagreement, as the WHO mentions, is due in part to the lack of adequate experimental studies in animals for population risk assessment, and also to controversial differences in the results of different studies [65].

1.2.3. The Role of BPA in the Disruption of Glucose Metabolism and Insulin Resistance

The ability of BPA to interfere with the endocrine system by binding to oestrogen receptors allows it to cause an imbalance similar to the endocrine disruption that occurs during pregnancy due to changes in oestrogen levels, such as the disruption in glucose metabolism and insulin resistance (IR) [66]. One of the functions of oestrogens is involvement in regulating the energy balance, glucose homoeostasis, and insulin sensitivity. Both aforementioned oestrogen receptors—ER-α and ER-β—are present in the hypothalamic nucleus, but ER-α has been shown to be the main isoform in terms of controlling the body’s energy balance [67].
Several studies [68,69,70,71] have shown that BPA binds to membrane-bound forms of the ER (mER) and with high affinity to a transmembrane ER receptor GPR30. In addition to its oestrogenic activity, there is mounting evidence that BPA interacts with other nuclear receptors, although at higher concentrations, for example, it binds to the thyroid hormone receptor (TR) with lower affinity than the ER [72]. In pancreatic β-cells, in the presence of stimulatory glucose concentrations, low concentrations of BPA produce the activation of the PKG by the cGMP, and rapidly decrease the KATP channel activity through ERβ, enhancing glucose-induced [Ca2+] i signals and insulin release. In addition, there is an activation of the transcription of the insulin gene via ERα—ERK1/2 that activates the transcription factor NeuroD1 (See Figure 2) [41,73,74].
Gestational insulin resistance is a natural phenomenon that appears physiologically during pregnancy to more easily direct nutrients present in blood to the growing foetus [61,76]; however, plasma glucose levels can increase and promote gestational diabetes. Insulin resistance specifically appears as the result of a hormonal action originated by the placenta. Jointly with insulin resistance, glucose metabolism is also disturbed—manifested through the attenuation of glucose uptake by muscle, adipose, and liver tissue and inadequate suppression of gluconeogenesis in the liver [77]. The fact that glucose uptake by maternal tissues decreases implies an increase in blood glucose levels, which is beneficial for the embryo’s nutrition. A 2016 study suggested that placental lactogen promotes the consumption of lipids in the mother’s body more so than glucose, and this also contributes to preserving glucose for the embryo’s nutrition [78]. Later, as an adaptation mechanism to these physiological disruptions, the body increases insulin production by using pancreatic β cells. Another adaptation mechanism occurs in pancreatic β cells located in the islets of Langerhans; these undergo hypertrophy and start to secrete greater amounts of insulin. In some cases where the pancreatic β cells do not respond well to changes in the body, the ineffectiveness of this adaptation mechanism leads to gestational diabetes, shown by an increase in blood glucose levels in previously healthy women with no history of diabetes. The pancreatic β cells express both oestrogen and progesterone receptors, and in gestational diabetes they may stop responding adequately to stimuli from these hormones [75]. The oestrogen molecule has the ability to bind to a membrane receptor and close the K+ channels in it. The membrane then depolarises, which allows calcium to enter that triggers the release of insulin. In a study carried out by a group of researchers at Miguel Hernández University in Alicante, it was shown that the exposure of adult mice to a low dose (10 μg/kg) of E2 (17-β-oestradiol) or BPA induced an increase in plasma insulin. They also saw that longer exposures induced an increase in the insulin content in pancreatic ß cells in response to a stimulus of their oestrogen receptors. They began to see these effects at doses as low as 10 μg/kg and from day two. After several days of treatment with E2 or BPA, the mice developed chronic hyperinsulinaemia [74].
A similar effect can be observed after taking hormonal contraceptives with oestrogens, which is why they have been associated with changes in carbohydrate metabolism and increased insulin resistance [79]. Some studies show a 43–61% increase in plasma glucose in women taking this type of contraceptive [79,80], while other studies—in addition to this study—also found an increase in insulin levels during fasting and after glucose intake, and recommended that oestrogen levels in contraceptives be reduced to minimise their diabetogenic effect [79,80].
Several studies have analysed the risk of exposure to low doses of BPA on the metabolism in animals, finding hyperinsulinaemia, lower body temperatures, and lower physical activity in exposed mice compared to the control group [81]. When exposure was combined with a high-fat diet during pregnancy, high levels of fasting blood glucose, glucose intolerance, and high levels of non-esterified fatty acids in plasma were found in the offspring compared to the control group [82].
Exposure during pregnancy in women causes glucose intolerance and high levels of insulin, triglycerides, and leptin in plasma compared to the control group, which seems to indicate that exposure to BPA during pregnancy promotes glucose intolerance [83]. The long-term consequences that were observed were weight gain for at least four months, increased perigonadal fat, decreased insulin sensitivity, and elevated plasma insulin levels compared to the control group; the elevation of leptin levels remained for several months [84,85].
Other studies showed that exposure to BPA can cause increased adipogenesis in human cells. Their results indicated that it is not just BPA, but also its main metabolite that is capable of stimulating adipocyte differentiation [86,87]. Exposure to BPA appears to decrease adipocyte sensitivity to insulin due to decreased expression of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) and phosphorylation of the insulin receptor, suggesting that BPA also induces disorders in the metabolism of glucose and increases the risk of type 2 diabetes [86,87,88,89].
The lack of consensus on the safety of BPA combined with the fact that more and more articles have indicated that exposure to BPA is directly related to an increased risk of causing endocrine system disruptions drove us to carry out this literature review to better understand the mechanisms by which endocrine disruptors, specifically BPA, disrupt the molecular pathways of the endocrine system.

2. Search Methodology

The literature search was carried out on PubMed and Web Of Science. The search strategy was carried out by combining the MeSH terms ‘bisphenol A’, ‘BPA’, ‘endocrine disruptors’, ‘obesity’, ‘insulin resistance’, and ‘glucose intolerance’, combined with each other using Boolean operators. Articles from within the last 10 years were selected, giving a total of 17 to review. All the articles included the Bisphenol A endocrine disruptor and its relationship with insulin resistance or glucose intolerance. They have been divided into two groups for review and analysis. On the one hand, those dealing with experimental research studies in animals (Table 1) and, on the other, observational studies in humans (Table 2). In all experimental works, the intervention consisted of exposure to doses of BPA. In observational studies, the relationship between the levels of BPA in urine or blood with disruptions in glucose and/or insulin metabolism was studied.

3. Discussion and Conclusions

There is more and more evidence to point to endocrine disruptors being an additional risk factor to take into account. Understanding the relationship between them and obesity or diabetes would help ensure that appropriate measures are taken to raise awareness among the population and to prevent their negative effects on health.
In recent decades, endocrine disruptors have been subject to much research and debate, and the amount of information about them today is overwhelming. There are many articles dealing with endocrine disruptors and the trend is for publications on them to increase given that it is a fairly recent topic with many unresolved issues. Conversely, as indicated above, phenols are widely-used compounds in modern society in developed countries and are increasingly being used in developing countries. This means that science cannot ignore whether one of the many properties of this compound is to disrupt the endocrine system. The numerous studies published in recent years—both experimental and epidemiological—have contributed to our understanding of some of the properties and to better understand how they affect people.
Some studies have shown how adipocytes can hypertrophy when exposed to certain concentrations of BPA as occurs in obesity, as well as presenting a higher prevalence of obesity, abdominal obesity, and insulin resistance [15,95,96,102]. The effects of BPA on obesity are not only measured using BMI, but also in the effects it produces on lipids, glucose, and adipose tissue.
The result of this review suggests that bisphenol A is capable of acting as an endocrine disruptor through the modifications produced by this chemical in glucose and insulin homoeostasis [81,92], specifically when this exposure occurs at low BPA concentrations [90,97,98] and during the foetal period [91,93,94]. The explanation most often proposed by the scientific community to explain this phenomenon lies in the xenoestrogenic properties of this compound. Due to a certain structural similarity between BPA and 17-beta-oestrogen molecules, the former can bind to the oestrogen receptors of pancreatic beta cells that have an insulin-stimulating action.
The tissues most susceptible to BPA are related to embryonic development (such as the placenta, umbilical cord, and amniotic fluid) as well as postnatal development under maternal influence (such as breast milk and colostrum). It is, therefore, logical that experimental studies in mice showed transgenerational effects in offspring, even though they have not been exposed to BPA. Increased insulin secretion stands out among these effects, which is the body’s physiological response to carbohydrate intolerance, which occurs in metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes.
In addition to observing that offspring had increased insulin secretion compared to the control groups, other arguments supporting the role of BPA as an endocrine disruptor are that the levels of leptin, triglycerides, and glycerol also increased [83]. These findings are similar to those found in metabolic syndrome, one of the main causes being obesity. Metabolic syndrome is considered a disease in itself that also increases the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases. One of the main conclusions drawn from this review is that BPA is capable of disrupting the endocrine system, producing effects that are very similar to those of metabolic syndrome, such as elevated triglyceride levels and insulin resistance.
One of the current unanswered questions about BPA is at what concentrations its effects occur and whether there is a limit beyond which its ability as an endocrine disruptor decreases. Alonso-Magdalena et al. and Wei et al. obtained similar conclusions when it was observed that the disruptions mainly occurred at low doses of BPA and not at higher doses. This suggests that there may be a critical narrow concentration range for the action of BPA and that exposures above or below that range would be less harmful to the body [83,95].
Several authors have analysed what happens in prolonged foetal exposure to BPA during the neonatal period and have evaluated the metabolic disruptions that exposure to environmentally equivalent concentrations normally received by humans in mice and their offspring could have and concluded that females exposed to BPA during childhood showed signs of obesity and metabolic disturbances such as increased triglyceride levels, hyperinsulinaemia, and insulin resistance [83,91,92,93,95,99]. Other studies, however, showed glucose metabolism disruptions to be greater in males [95,98]. This is another discrepancy that continues to exist among researchers. Studies pursuing this specific objective would be required to clarify whether there is a difference between the effect produced in men and women, as currently, there does not appear to be sufficient evidence to support one position or the other. The reason why some studies have found differences between sexes still remains unclear; the main difference found is that males have greater insulin resistance than females. One of the proposed explanations lies in a different hepatic metabolism of BPA. Females have been found to have higher levels of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase, which is involved in the transformation of BPA and its elimination from the body [103].
The disruptions produced by BPA in glucose metabolism and insulin homoeostasis can also occur physiologically in humans at the time of gestation, in which a physiological or pathological insulin resistance occurs, as in type 2 diabetes. Nutrition plays a key role in this second case, which is why the effects of prenatal BPA exposure on adipose tissue and metabolism in goats were analysed, introducing a novel factor of analysing whether a high-calorie, high-fat diet would exacerbate the disruptions caused by BPA. The combination of both factors was not seen to increase endocrine disruptions; nevertheless, they did find that the disruptions produced by both were similar: insulin resistance and adipocyte hypertrophy [96]. The results of all these studies in animals show how metabolic disruptions in pancreatic cells and adipocytes are similar to those in obesity.
In the second part of the results of this literature review, we analysed articles that studied the levels of BPA in humans [15,100,101,102,103]. Most of these epidemiological studies do so by measuring the concentration in urine, as the half-life of BPA is very short and its excretion is in urine, which makes measuring its concentration in urine easier than in blood. All studies in this literature review found a positive relationship, but some have weak evidence as they excluded other factors that may influence the metabolic disruptions caused by BPA. Several of these studies highlighted the triple association between BPA, obesity, and diabetes due to the ability of BPA to mimic natural oestrogens in the body [15,102]. Due to a certain structural similarity between the 17- β-oestradiol and BPA molecules, this can bind to the oestrogen receptors of pancreatic beta cells that have an insulin-stimulating action.
The results obtained from these studies add to the conclusions already drawn from experimental studies in animals. In pre-adolescent females exposed to BPA, the baseline levels of oestradiol and androstenedione were significantly higher than in those who were not exposed, with the elevated levels of these hormones and greater insulin resistance remaining one year later [100]. This suggests the exposure to BPA in pre-adolescents can disrupt endocrine metabolism due to its ability to act as a natural oestrogen.
Although concentrations of BPA are more difficult to measure in blood due to its short half-life, many participants have also presented with disrupted basal blood glucose levels and insulin resistance [102]. We also found discrepancies in the differences between sexes. Wang et al. concluded that exposure to BPA was associated with impaired glucose homoeostasis prior to development of diabetes in middle-aged and elderly women, but not in men [101].
The main limitation of this work is that most of the articles analysed are animal studies and not human studies due to the logical ethical difficulties of carrying out this type of study in humans. Another limitation is that the disruptions in the endocrine system produced by bisphenol A have been studied without considering possible interactions with other external factors.
As indicated above, there is not a general consensus of all countries in the establishment of a limit as a safe dose, so as not disrupt the glucose-stimulated insulin response in humans [51,63,64,103]. It is appropriate to keep this information in mind for prevention, as this compound is widely used in many countries and avoiding its exposure is tricky. Today, BPA-free plastic products are increasingly available, such as BPA-free water bottles, but the use of BPA-free polymers is not widespread and BPA is often simply replaced by one of its analogues, BPS or BPF, which may exhibit similar behaviours as BPA. Some of the current alternatives are to replace it with other materials that do not have an oestrogenic activity, such as glass or plastics for bottles or food containers without phenols.
In conclusion, endocrine disruptors may be an additional risk factor to consider in the development of obesity as they are capable of stimulating adipocyte hypertrophy and this appears to confirm a positive association between the levels of BPA in the body and obesity. The results of the experimental studies mostly point to BPA having the ability to disrupt the endocrine system by mimicking the effects of the oestrogen molecule, which is why more experimental and epidemiological research will be necessary to establish the scale of the effects caused by BPA in large populations and its association with insulin resistance and diabetes. Epidemiological studies carried out on humans suggest that the same disruptions seen in experimental studies on animals may be found; however, despite many countries having developed policies to limit exposure to BPA in their populations, there is a lack of international agreement. Understanding the relationship between EDs and obesity will help to raise awareness in the population and adopt public health campaigns to prevent exposure—especially among young people—to these substances.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.P.-B., I.M.-P., and M.T.M.-L.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, M.P.-B., I.M.-P., and M.T.M.-L.; Writing—Review and Editing, M.P.-B., I.M.-P., and M.T.M.-L.; Supervision, M.P.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research was funded by the Catholic University of Valencia under grant number 2021-275-001.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.


The authors thank the Catholic University of Valencia San Vicente Mártir for their contribution and help in the payment of the Open Access publication fee. Likewise, they appreciate the encouragement and guidance from their Vice-Rector for Research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. World Health Organization. Nutrition. Challenges. Available online: (accessed on 6 December 2020).
  2. Dhurandhar, N.V.; Schoeller, D.; Brown, A.W.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Thomas, D.; Sørensen, T.I.; Speakman, J.R.; Jeansonne, M.; Allison, D.B.; Energy Balance Measurement Working Group. Response to “Energy balance measurement: When something is not better than nothing”. Int. J. Obes. 2015, 39, 1175–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  3. Dhurandhar, N.V.; Schoeller, D.; Brown, A.W.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Thomas, D.; Sørensen, T.I.; Speakman, J.R.; Jeansonne, M.; Allison, D.B.; Energy Balance Measurement Working Group. Energy balance measurement: When something is not better than nothing. Int. J. Obes. 2015, 39, 1109–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Zulet, M.A.; Puchau, B.; Navarro, C.; Martí, A.; Martínez, J.A. Biomarcadores del estado inflamatorio: Nexo de unión con la obesidad y complicaciones asociadas. Nutr. Hosp. 2007, 22, 511–527. [Google Scholar]
  5. Freedman, L.S.; Commins, J.M.; Moler, J.E.; Arab, L.; Baer, D.J.; Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; Moshfegh, A.J.; Neuhouser, M.L.; Prentice, R.L.; et al. Pooled results from 5 validation studies of dietary self-report instruments using recovery biomarkers for energy and protein intake. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2014, 180, 172–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. Baillie-Hamilton, P.F. Chemical toxins: A hypothesis to explain the global obesity epidemic. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2002, 8, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kelishadi, R.; Poursafa, P.; Jamshidi, F. Role of environmental chemicals in obesity: A systematic review on the current evidence. J. Environ. Public Health 2013, 896789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. Dodds, E.C.; Lawson, W. Synthetic strogenic Agents without the Phenanthrene Nucleus. Nature 1936, 137, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zoeller, R.T.; Brown, T.R.; Doan, L.L.; Gore, A.C.; Skakkebaek, N.E.; Soto, A.M.; Woodruff, T.J.; Vom Saal, F.S. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: A statement of principles from The Endocrine Society. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 4097–4110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bergman, A.; Brandt, I.; Brouwer, A.; Harrison, P.; Holmes, P.; Humfrey, C.; Keiding, N.; Randall, G.; Sharpe, R.; Skakkebaek, N. In Proceedings of the European Workshop on the Impact of Endocrine Disrupters on Human Health and Wildlife, Weybridge, UK, 2–4 December 1996.
  11. Cunha, S.C.; Almeida, C.; Mendes, E.; Fernandes, J.O. Simultaneous determination of bisphenol A and bisphenol B in beverages and powdered infant formula by dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction and heart-cutting multidimensional gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess. 2011, 28, 513–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. La Merrill, M.; Birnbaum, L.S. Childhood obesity and environmental chemicals. Mt. Sinai J. Med. 2011, 78, 22–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Agay-Shay, K.; Martinez, D.; Valvi, D.; Garcia-Esteban, R.; Basagaña, X.; Robinson, O.; Casas, M.; Sunyer, J.; Vrijheid, M. Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals during Pregnancy and Weight at 7 Years of Age: A Multi-pollutant Approach. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 1030–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Scinicariello, F.; Buser, M.C. Urinary polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and childhood obesity: NHANES (2001–2006). Environ. Health Perspect. 2014, 122, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  15. Wang, T.; Li, M.; Chen, B.; Xu, M.; Xu, Y.; Huang, Y.; Lu, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; et al. Urinary bisphenol A (BPA) concentration associates with obesity and insulin resistance. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E223–E227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  16. Carwile, J.L.; Michels, K.B. Urinary bisphenol A and obesity: NHANES 2003-2006. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 825–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  17. Bhandari, R.; Xiao, J.; Shankar, A. Urinary bisphenol A and obesity in U.S. children. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2013, 177, 1263–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  18. Trasande, L.; Attina, T.M.; Blustein, J. Association between urinary bisphenol a concentration and obesity prevalence in children and adolescents. JAMA 2012, 308, 1113–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  19. Thayer, K.A.; Doerge, D.R.; Hunt, D.; Schurman, S.H.; Twaddle, N.C.; Churchwell, M.I.; Garantziotis, S.; Kissling, G.E.; Easterling, M.R.; Bucher, J.R.; et al. Pharmacokinetics of bisphenol A in humans following a single oral administration. Environ. Int. 2015, 83, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  20. Deckelbaum, R.J.; Williams, C.L. Childhood obesity: The health issue. Obes. Res. 2001, 9 (Suppl. S4), 239S–243S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Caballero, B. The global epidemic of obesity: An overview. Epidemiol. Rev. 2007, 29, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  22. GBD 2015 Obesity Collaborators; Afshin, A.; Forouzanfar, M.H.; Reitsma, M.B.; Sur, P.; Estep, K.; Lee, A.; Marczak, L.; Mokdad, A.H.; Moradi-Lakeh, M.; et al. Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 13–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pérez-Rodrigo, C. Current mapping of obesity. Nutr. Hosp. 2013, 28 (Suppl. S5), 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. National Health Survey Spain 2017. Available online: (accessed on 10 May 2021).
  25. Martos-Moreno, G.A.; Gil-Campos, M.; Bueno, G.; Bahillo, P.; Bernal, S.; Feliu, A.; Lechuga-Sancho, A.M.; Palomo, E.; Ruiz, R.; Vela, A.; et al. Obesity associated metabolic impairment is evident at early ages: Spanish collaborative study. Nutr. Hosp. 2014, 30, 787–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Must, A. Does overweight in childhood have an impact on adult health? Nutr. Rev. 2003, 61, 139–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. World Health Organization. Diabetes. Available online: (accessed on 2 June 2021).
  28. World Health Organization. Diabetes. Available online: (accessed on 2 June 2021).
  29. World Health Organization. Global Report on Diabetes. Available online: (accessed on 2 June 2021).
  30. American Diabetes Association Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. 2016 Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, S13–S22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  31. Ogurtsova, K.; da Rocha Fernandes, J.D.; Huang, Y.; Linnenkamp, U.; Guariguata, L.; Cho, N.H.; Cavan, D.; Shaw, J.E.; Makaroff, L.E. IDF diabetes atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 2017, 128, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  32. Braun, J.M. Early-life exposure to EDCs: Role in childhood obesity and neurodevelopment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017, 13, 161–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  33. Yang, C.; Lee, H.K.; Kong, A.P.S.; Lim, L.L.; Cai, Z.; Chung, A.C.K. Early-life exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals associates with childhood obesity. Ann. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018, 23, 182–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Birnbaum, L.S.; Bucher, J.R.; Collman, G.W.; Zeldin, D.C.; Johnson, A.F.; Schug, T.T.; Heindel, J.J. Consortium-based science: The NIEHS’s multipronged, collaborative approach to assessing the health effects of bisphenol A. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012, 120, 1640–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Schug, T.T.; Vogel, S.A.; Vandenberg, L.N.; Braun, J.M.; Hauser, R.; Taylor, J.A.; vom Saal, F.S.; Heindel, J.J. Bisphenol, A. In Dioxins and Health: Including Other Persistent Organic Pollutants and Endocrine Disruptors, 3rd ed.; Schecter, A., Ed.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 381–414. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pence, H.E.; Williams, A. ChemSpider: An Online Chemical Information Resource. J. Chem. Educ. 2010, 87, 1123–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Welshons, W.V.; Thayer, K.A.; Judy, B.M.; Taylor, J.A.; Curran, E.M.; vom Saal, F.S. Large effects from small exposures. I. Mechanisms for endocrine-disrupting chemicals with estrogenic activity. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 994–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Welshons, W.V.; Nagel, S.C.; vom Saal, F.S. Large effects from small exposures. III. Endocrine mechanisms mediating effects of bisphenol A at levels of human exposure. Endocrinology 2006, 147 (Suppl. S6), S56–S69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Routledge, E.J.; White, R.; Parker, M.G.; Sumpter, J.P. Differential effects of xenoestrogens on coactivator recruitment by estrogen receptor (ER) alpha and ERbeta. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 35986–35993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Alonso-Magdalena, P.; Ropero, A.B.; Soriano, S.; García-Arévalo, M.; Ripoll, C.; Fuentes, E.; Quesada, I.; Nadal, A. Bisphenol-A acts as a potent estrogen via non-classical estrogen triggered pathways. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2012, 355, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Alonso-Magdalena, P.; Ropero, A.B.; Carrera, M.P.; Cederroth, C.R.; Baquié, M.; Gauthier, B.R.; Nef, S.; Stefani, E.; Nadal, A. Pancreatic insulin content regulation by the estrogen receptor ER alpha. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  42. Vandenberg, L.N. Non-monotonic dose responses in studies of endocrine disrupting chemicals: Bisphenol a as a case study. Dose Response 2013, 12, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Liao, C.; Kannan, K. Concentrations and profiles of bisphenol A and other bisphenol analogues in foodstuffs from the United States and their implications for human exposure. J. Agric Food Chem. 2013, 61, 4655–4662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rosenmai, A.K.; Dybdahl, M.; Pedersen, M.; Alice van Vugt-Lussenburg, B.M.; Wedebye, E.B.; Taxvig, C.; Vinggaard, A.M. Are structural analogues to bisphenol a safe alternatives? Toxicol. Sci. 2014, 139, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, J.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Luo, F.; Li, S.; Yang, L.; Moez, E.K.; Dinu, I.; Martin, J.W. Bisphenol A Metabolites and Bisphenol S in Paired Maternal and Cord Serum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 2456–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Rochester, J.R.; Bolden, A.L. Bisphenol S and F: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the Hormonal Activity of Bisphenol A Substitutes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 643–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Cao, X.L.; Corriveau, J.; Popovic, S. Sources of low concentrations of bisphenol A in canned beverage products. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 1548–1551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Talsness, C.E.; Andrade, A.J.; Kuriyama, S.N.; Taylor, J.A.; vom Saal, F.S. Components of plastic: Experimental studies in animals and relevance for human health. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 2079–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  49. Konieczna, A.; Rutkowska, A.; Rachoń, D. Health risk of exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA). Rocz. Panstw. Zakl. Hig. 2015, 66, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Abraham, A.; Chakraborty, P. A review on sources and health impacts of bisphenol A. Rev. Environ. Health 2020, 35, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rahman, M.S.; Adegoke, E.O.; Pang, M.G. Drivers of owning more BPA. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 417, 126076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Goodson, A.; Robin, H.; Summerfield, W.; Cooper, I. Migration of bisphenol A from can coatings--effects of damage, storage conditions and heating. Food Addit. Contam. 2004, 21, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Repossi, A.; Farabegoli, F.; Gazzotti, T.; Zironi, E.; Pagliuca, G. Bisphenol A in Edible Part of Seafood. Ital. J. Food Saf. 2016, 5, 5666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  54. Biedermann, S.; Tschudin, P.; Grob, K. Transfer of bisphenol A from thermal printer paper to the skin. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398, 571–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Ehrlich, S.; Calafat, A.M.; Humblet, O.; Smith, T.; Hauser, R. Handling of thermal receipts as a source of exposure to bisphenol A. JAMA 2014, 311, 859–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Huang, Y.Q.; Wong, C.K.; Zheng, J.S.; Bouwman, H.; Barra, R.; Wahlström, B.; Neretin, L.; Wong, M.H. Bisphenol A (BPA) in China: A review of sources, environmental levels, and potential human health impacts. Environ. Int. 2012, 42, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Schönfelder, G.; Wittfoht, W.; Hopp, H.; Talsness, C.E.; Paul, M.; Chahoud, I. Parent bisphenol A accumulation in the human maternal-fetal-placental unit. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, A703–A707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Todaka, E.; Mori, C. Necessity to establish new risk assessment and risk communication for human fetal exposure to multiple endocrine disruptors in Japan. Congenit. Anom. 2002, 42, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ikezuki, Y.; Tsutsumi, O.; Takai, Y.; Kamei, Y.; Taketani, Y. Determination of bisphenol A concentrations in human biological fluids reveals significant early prenatal exposure. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 17, 2839–2841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  60. Ye, X.; Kuklenyik, Z.; Needham, L.L.; Calafat, A.M. Measuring environmental phenols and chlorinated organic chemicals in breast milk using automated on-line column-switching-high performance liquid chromatography-isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2006, 831, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  61. Brede, C.; Fjeldal, P.; Skjevrak, I.; Herikstad, H. Increased migration levels of bisphenol A from polycarbonate baby bottles after dishwashing, boiling and brushing. Food Addit. Contam. 2003, 20, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. LOI n° 2018-938 du 30 Octobre 2018 Pour L’équilibre des Relations Commerciales Dans le Secteur Agricole et al. Imentaire et une Alimentation Saine, Durable et Accessible à Tous. Available online: (accessed on 12 May 2021).
  63. EFSA Explains the Safety of Bisphenol A. Available online: (accessed on 5 December 2020).
  64. Oldring, P.K.; Castle, L.; O’Mahony, C.; Dixon, J. Estimates of dietary exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) from light metal packaging using food consumption and packaging usage data: A refined deterministic approach and a fully probabilistic (FACET) approach. Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess. 2014, 31, 466–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  65. World Health Organization. Toxicological and Health Aspects of Bisphenol A: Report of Joint FAO/WHO Expert Meeting 2–5 November 2010 and Report of Stakeholder Meeting on Bisphenol A; WHO: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pjanic, M. The role of polycarbonate monomer bisphenol-A in insulin resistance. PeerJ 2017, 5, e3809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  67. Mitra, S.W.; Hoskin, E.; Yudkovitz, J.; Pear, L.; Wilkinson, H.A.; Hayashi, S.; Pfaff, D.W.; Ogawa, S.; Rohrer, S.P.; Schaeffer, J.M.; et al. Immunolocalization of estrogen receptor beta in the mouse brain: Comparison with estrogen receptor alpha. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 2055–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Watson, C.S.; Bulayeva, N.N.; Wozniak, A.L.; Alyea, R.A. Xenoestrogens are potent activators of nongenomic estrogenic responses. Steroids 2007, 72, 124–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  69. Thomas, P.; Dong, J. Binding and activation of the seven-transmembrane estrogen receptor GPR30 by environmental estrogens: A potential novel mechanism of endocrine disruption. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 102, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Viñas, R.; Watson, C.S. Bisphenol S disrupts estradiol-induced nongenomic signaling in a rat pituitary cell line: Effects on cell functions. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 352–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Wetherill, Y.B.; Akingbemi, B.T.; Kanno, J.; McLachlan, J.A.; Nadal, A.; Sonnenschein, C.; Watson, C.S.; Zoeller, R.T.; Belcher, S.M. In vitro molecular mechanisms of bisphenol a action. Reprod. Toxicol. 2007, 24, 178–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Moriyama, K.; Tagami, T.; Akamizu, T.; Usui, T.; Saijo, M.; Kanamoto, N.; Hataya, Y.; Shimatsu, A.; Kuzuya, H.; Nakao, K. Thyroid hormone action is disrupted by bisphenol A as an antagonist. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 5185–5190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wong, W.P.; Tiano, J.P.; Liu, S.; Hewitt, S.C.; Le May, C.; Dalle, S.; Katzenellenbogen, J.A.; Katzenellenbogen, B.S.; Korach, K.S.; Mauvais-Jarvis, F. Extranuclear estrogen receptor-alpha stimulates NeuroD1 binding to the insulin promoter and favors insulin synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 13057–13062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  74. Alonso-Magdalena, P.; Morimoto, S.; Ripoll, C.; Fuentes, E.; Nadal, A. The estrogenic effect of bisphenol A disrupts pancreatic beta-cell function in vivo and induces insulin resistance. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 106–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  75. Nadal, A.; Alonso-Magdalena, P.; Soriano, S.; Quesada, I.; Ropero, A.B. The pancreatic beta-cell as a target of estrogens and xenoestrogens: Implications for blood glucose homeostasis and diabetes. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 304, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  76. Mack, L.R.; Tomich, P.G. Gestational Diabetes: Diagnosis, Classification, and Clinical Care. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 44, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Catalano, P.M.; Kirwan, J.P.; Haugel-de Mouzon, S.; King, J. Gestational diabetes and insulin resistance: Role in short- and long-term implications for mother and fetus. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 1674S–1683S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Baz, B.; Riveline, J.P.; Gautier, J.F. Endocrinology of pregnancy: Gestational diabetes mellitus: Definition, aetiological and clinical aspects. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2016, 174, R43–R51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  79. Lopez, L.M.; Grimes, D.A.; Schulz, K.F. Steroidal contraceptives: Effect on carbohydrate metabolism in women without diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 11, CD006133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Godsland, I.F.; Crook, D.; Simpson, R.; Proudler, T.; Felton, C.; Lees, B.; Anyaoku, V.; Devenport, M.; Wynn, V. The effects of different formulations of oral contraceptive agents on lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. N. Engl. J. Med. 1990, 323, 1375–1381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Batista, T.M.; Alonso-Magdalena, P.; Vieira, E.; Amaral, M.E.; Cederroth, C.R.; Nef, S.; Quesada, I.; Carneiro, E.M.; Nadal, A. Short-term treatment with bisphenol-A leads to metabolic abnormalities in adult male mice. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. García-Arevalo, M.; Alonso-Magdalena, P.; Rebelo Dos Santos, J.; Quesada, I.; Carneiro, E.M.; Nadal, A. Exposure to bisphenol-A during pregnancy partially mimics the effects of a high-fat diet altering glucose homeostasis and gene expression in adult male mice. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  83. Alonso-Magdalena, P.; Vieira, E.; Soriano, S.; Menes, L.; Burks, D.; Quesada, I.; Nadal, A. Bisphenol A exposure during pregnancy disrupts glucose homeostasis in mothers and adult male offspring. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010, 118, 1243–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  84. Friedman, J.M.; Halaas, J.L. Leptin and the regulation of body weight in mammals. Nature 1998, 395, 763–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Alonso-Magdalena, P.; García-Arévalo, M.; Quesada, I.; Nadal, A. Bisphenol-A treatment during pregnancy in mice: A new window of susceptibility for the development of diabetes in mothers later in life. Endocrinology 2015, 156, 1659–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  86. Ohlstein, J.F.; Strong, A.L.; McLachlan, J.A.; Gimble, J.M.; Burow, M.E.; Bunnell, B.A. Bisphenol A enhances adipogenic differentiation of human adipose stromal/stem cells. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014, 53, 345–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Boucher, J.G.; Boudreau, A.; Ahmed, S.; Atlas, E. In Vitro Effects of Bisphenol a β-D-Glucuronide (BPA-G) on Adipogenesis in Human and Murine Preadipocytes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2015, 123, 1287–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  88. Valentino, R.; D’Esposito, V.; Passaretti, F.; Liotti, A.; Cabaro, S.; Longo, M.; Perruolo, G.; Oriente, F.; Beguinot, F.; Formisano, P. Bisphenol-A impairs insulin action and up-regulates inflammatory pathways in human subcutaneous adipocytes and 3T3-L1 cells. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e82099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  89. Dai, Y.E.; Chen, W.; Qi, H.; Liu, Q.Q. Effect of bisphenol a on SOCS-3 and insulin signaling transduction in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 14, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Angle, B.M.; Do, R.P.; Ponzi, D.; Stahlhut, R.W.; Drury, B.E.; Nagel, S.C.; Welshons, W.V.; Besch-Williford, C.L.; Palanza, P.; Parmigiani, S.; et al. Metabolic disruption in male mice due to fetal exposure to low but not high doses of bisphenol A (BPA): Evidence for effects on body weight, food intake, adipocytes, leptin, adiponectin, insulin and glucose regulation. Reprod. Toxicol. 2013, 42, 256–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  91. Susiarjo, M.; Xin, F.; Bansal, A.; Stefaniak, M.; Li, C.; Simmons, R.A.; Bartolomei, M.S. Bisphenol a exposure disrupts metabolic health across multiple generations in the mouse. Endocrinology 2015, 156, 2049–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Bansal, A.; Li, C.; Xin, F.; Duemler, A.; Li, W.; Rashid, C.; Bartolomei, M.S.; Simmons, R.A. Transgenerational effects of maternal bisphenol: A exposure on offspring metabolic health. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2019, 10, 164–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. García-Arévalo, M.; Alonso-Magdalena, P.; Servitja, J.M.; Boronat-Belda, T.; Merino, B.; Villar-Pazos, S.; Medina-Gómez, G.; Novials, A.; Quesada, I.; Nadal, A. Maternal Exposure to Bisphenol-A during Pregnancy Increases Pancreatic β-Cell Growth During Early Life in Male Mice Offspring. Endocrinology 2016, 157, 4158–4171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Whitehead, R.; Guan, H.; Arany, E.; Cernea, M.; Yang, K. Prenatal exposure to bisphenol A alters mouse fetal pancreatic morphology and islet composition. Horm. Mol. Biol. Clin. Investig. 2016, 25, 171–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Wei, J.; Lin, Y.; Li, Y.; Ying, C.; Chen, J.; Song, L.; Zhou, Z.; Lv, Z.; Xia, W.; Chen, X.; et al. Perinatal exposure to bisphenol A at reference dose predisposes offspring to metabolic syndrome in adult rats on a high-fat diet. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 3049–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  96. Veiga-Lopez, A.; Moeller, J.; Sreedharan, R.; Singer, K.; Lumeng, C.; Ye, W.; Pease, A.; Padmanabhan, V. Developmental programming: Interaction between prenatal BPA exposure and postnatal adiposity on metabolic variables in female sheep. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 310, E238–E247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  97. Soriano, S.; Alonso-Magdalena, P.; García-Arévalo, M.; Novials, A.; Muhammed, S.J.; Salehi, A.; Gustafsson, J.A.; Quesada, I.; Nadal, A. Rapid insulinotropic action of low doses of bisphenol-A on mouse and human islets of Langerhans: Role of estrogen receptor β. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e31109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  98. Liu, J.; Yu, P.; Qian, W.; Li, Y.; Zhao, J.; Huan, F.; Wang, J.; Xiao, H. Perinatal bisphenol A exposure and adult glucose homeostasis: Identifying critical windows of exposure. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rubin, B.S.; Paranjpe, M.; DaFonte, T.; Schaeberle, C.; Soto, A.M.; Obin, M.; Greenberg, A.S. Perinatal BPA exposure alters body weight and composition in a dose specific and sex specific manner: The addition of peripubertal exposure exacerbates adverse effects in female mice. Reprod. Toxicol. 2017, 68, 130–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  100. Lee, H.A.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, H.; Gwak, H.S.; Park, E.A.; Cho, S.J.; Kim, H.S.; Ha, E.H.; Park, H. Effect of urinary bisphenolA on androgenic hormones and insulin resistance in preadolescent girls: A pilot study from the Ewha Birth & Growth Cohort. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 5737–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  101. Wang, B.; Li, M.; Zhao, Z.; Lu, J.; Chen, Y.; Xu, Y.; Xu, M.; Wang, W.; Wang, T.; Bi, Y.; et al. Urinary bisphenol A concentration and glucose homeostasis in non-diabetic adults: A repeated-measures, longitudinal study. Diabetologia 2019, 62, 1591–1600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Savastano, S.; Tarantino, G.; D’Esposito, V.; Passaretti, F.; Cabaro, S.; Liotti, A.; Liguoro, D.; Perruolo, G.; Ariemma, F.; Finelli, C.; et al. Bisphenol-A plasma levels are related to inflammatory markers, visceral obesity and insulin-resistance: A cross-sectional study on adult male population. J. Transl. Med. 2015, 13, 169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  103. Stahlhut, R.W.; Myers, J.P.; Taylor, J.A.; Nadal, A.; Dyer, J.A.; Vom Saal, F.S. Experimental BPA Exposure and Glucose-Stimulated Insulin Response in Adult Men and Women. J. Endocr. Soc. 2018, 2, 1173–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of bisphenol A.
Figure 1. Chemical structure of bisphenol A.
Biomedicines 09 00666 g001
Figure 2. Mechanism of the action of BPA through intracellular ERα and ERβ receptors and those present in the plasma membrane of the β cell (GPR30). Modified from [75].
Figure 2. Mechanism of the action of BPA through intracellular ERα and ERβ receptors and those present in the plasma membrane of the β cell (GPR30). Modified from [75].
Biomedicines 09 00666 g002
Table 1. Experimental studies in animals.
Table 1. Experimental studies in animals.
Ref.YearNo. of SubjectsExposure DoseStageConclusions
[81]20122 groups 6–9 mice/group100 µg/kg body weight/day3-month-old male OF-1 mice The mice exposed to BPA developed insulin resistance and hyperinsulinaemia and increased secretion in response to glucose stimulation. They also presented a lower body temperature and were less active than those in the control group.
[83]20103 groups 8–13 mice/group10 or 100 μg/kg body weight/day3-month pregnant OF-1 mice BPA produces metabolic disorders that disrupt glucose homoeostasis, which is considered a risk factor for diabetes. The offspring has lower glucose tolerance, as well as higher insulin resistance and higher plasma levels of insulin, leptin, triglycerides, and glycerol.
[90]20137 groups 13–17 mice/group5, 50, 500, 5000, and 50,000 μg/kg body weight/day3-month-old nulliparous female CD-1The mice exposed to BPA at four different doses significantly lose the ability to maintain normal glucose levels and show greater insulin insensitivity.
[91]20153 groups 9–13 mice/grouplower dose: 10 μg/kg body weight/day; upper dose: 10 mg/kg body weight/day Six-week-old virgin C57BL/6 femalesEarly life exposure to environmental EDs can disrupt the metabolism of the developing foetus, as well as that of its offspring. Weight gain was observed in male offspring compared to controls, as well as glucose intolerance during adulthood.
[92]20193 groups 11 mice/grouplower dose: 10 μg/kg body weight/day; upper dose: 10 mg/kg body weight/dayC57BL/6J virgin female mice (F0) crossed with 8–10 weeks old C57BL/6J malesThis study suggests that BPA exposure can be passed down through generations by epigenetic modifications. The third generation has a lower number of pancreatic ß cells and an increase in insulin secretion.
[93]2016Control group: 73 mice; BPA10 group: 63; BPA100 group: 56.10 or 100 μg/kg body weight/day3-month pregnant OF-1 miceThe offspring of pregnant females exposed to BPA at doses of either 10 μg/kg/day or higher doses of 100 μg/kg/day presented higher levels of insulin in the blood compared to the control group.
[94]2016Not Available5 mg/kg body weight/day6-8-week-old breeding pairs of adult C57BL/6 miceExposure to BPA increases glucagon expression and the number of ß-cell islets in the pancreas that express it, suggesting that BPA may disrupt pancreatic cell differentiation.
[95]201164 mice (32 female and 32 male)50, 250, or 1250 μg/kg body weight/day. Dosages were adjusted daily for body weight changes of pregnant rats (2.0 mL/kg body weight)Virgin female (270–300 g) and male (350–400 g) genitor Wistar rats. Pups measured on postnatal days 1, 5 10, 15, and 21Perinatal exposure to BPA is implicated in the development of obesity and compromises the proper metabolism functioning, particularly when exposure is at small doses (50 ug/kg). The males of the offspring present hyperinsulinaemia and metabolic disturbances that increase with age.
[96]2016Groups of 6–9 female sheep0.05, 0.5, or 5 mg/kg body weight/day from days 30 through 90 of gestationAdult Suffolk breed sheep (2–5 y old)Exposure to BPA during foetal life at levels equivalent to those found in humans can disrupt metabolism, leading to insulin resistance and adipocyte hypertrophy.
The defects produced in the metabolism of glucose and insulin are similar to those produced by a high-fat diet.
[97]2012Not Available1 nMAdult C57 female mice Environmentally significant doses of BPA have an insulinotropic action on the islets of Langerhans.
[98]201315–30 mice per group100 µg/kg body weight/day8 weeks old male and female C57BL6 mice (F0)The results suggest that exposure to BPA could contribute to the appearance of metabolic disorders that lead to significant disruptions in glucose homoeostasis. Furthermore, the effects of BPA seem to be dose-, sex-, and time-dependent and are greater if exposure occurs during the foetal development period.
[99]201715–30 mice per group0, 0.25, 2.5, 25, or 250 μg BPA/kg body weight/day from GD 8 to lactational day 16Breeding pairs of adult C57BL/6 miceThe effects of BPA are dose- and sex-dependent.
The second exposure exacerbated the adverse effects of BPA exposure in females, who presented signs of obesity and metabolic disturbances such as increased triglyceride levels, hyperinsulinaemia, and insulin resistance.
OF-1, CD-1, C57BL/6 they are species of mice.
Table 2. Observational studies in humans.
Table 2. Observational studies in humans.
[15]20123390 aged 40 y or olderLevels of BPA in urine are positively associated with obesity, increased abdominal fat, and insulin resistance in Chinese adults and the elderly.
[100]201348 children aged 7 to 8 yearsExposure to BPA in pre-adolescents can disrupt endocrine metabolism due to its ability to act as a natural oestrogen. In the group exposed to BPA, the levels of base oestradiol and androstenedione were significantly higher than in the control group. A year later, the girls who had been exposed to BPA showed elevated levels of these hormones as well as insulin resistance.
[101]20192336 aged 40 y or older followed for 4 yearsExposure to BPA was independently associated with impaired glucose homoeostasis prior to development of diabetes in middle-aged and elderly women, but not in men. In women, increased urinary concentrations of BPA were associated with an increased risk of developing hyperglycaemia and dysfunction of pancreatic ß cells.
[102]201576 Caucasian male
53.5 ± 5.7 mean y age
In subjects with higher levels of BPA in the blood, higher levels of inflammation markers were found, and they had higher percentages of visceral fat and higher metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance prevalence.
[103]20188 healthy adult males and 8 adult females (postmenopausal), with obesity and prediabetes by HbA1cThis study suggests that exposure to BPA at a dose of 50 ug/kg may disrupt the glucose-stimulated insulin response in humans. A strong positive relationship is found between HbA1c and the percentage changes in the insulin index.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pérez-Bermejo, M.; Mas-Pérez, I.; Murillo-Llorente, M.T. The Role of the Bisphenol A in Diabetes and Obesity. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 666.

AMA Style

Pérez-Bermejo M, Mas-Pérez I, Murillo-Llorente MT. The Role of the Bisphenol A in Diabetes and Obesity. Biomedicines. 2021; 9(6):666.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pérez-Bermejo, Marcelino, Irene Mas-Pérez, and Maria Teresa Murillo-Llorente. 2021. "The Role of the Bisphenol A in Diabetes and Obesity" Biomedicines 9, no. 6: 666.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop