Skip to Content
MDPIMDPI

Advanced

by
  • Donovan Tay 1,†,
  • Jeeban P. Das 2,† and
  • Randy Yeh 2,*

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Paper well written. I suggest to be less verbose in the description of every single technique highlighting better the role of new imaging modalities as PET/CT and 4DceCT and fusion imaging PET/CeCT (4D).

 

Minor revision in references considering the latest works on imaging fusion PET/CECT are required

 

Author Response

please see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The article describes an interesting subject. It is a well - written review with the most recent and complete compilation of knowledge. It presents the subject in a smooth, interesting, logical and systematic way.

I do not find any major drawbacks in this review.
However it would be worth of mention that in some countries indium 111In is used instead of sestamibi and I didnt find in the article any information of the use of FDG-PET and nevertheless this is the tracer used in 92% of PET scans worldwide.

 

Author Response

please see attached file

Author Response File: Author Response.docx