Next Article in Journal
Addition of K22 Converts Spider Venom Peptide Pme2a from an Activator to an Inhibitor of NaV1.7
Previous Article in Journal
5-(Carbamoylmethylene)-oxazolidin-2-ones as a Promising Class of Heterocycles Inducing Apoptosis Triggered by Increased ROS Levels and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Breast and Cervical Cancer
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Co-Expression of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) in Untreated EGFR-Mutated Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma

Biomedicines 2020, 8(2), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8020036
by Ping-Chih Hsu 1, Chih-Wei Wang 2, Scott Chih-Hsi Kuo 1, Shu-Min Lin 1, Yu-Lun Lo 1, Allen Chung-Cheng Huang 1, Li-Chung Chiu 1 and Cheng-Ta Yang 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Biomedicines 2020, 8(2), 36; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8020036
Submission received: 18 January 2020 / Revised: 14 February 2020 / Accepted: 16 February 2020 / Published: 19 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Biology and Oncology)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I like to commend the authors for undertaking this study.  Although the result did not reveal any cross-interaction between EGFR and PD-1 pathway, it is important to have these negative study in the face of other reported positive study.  The interaction between EGFR and immune checkpoint may be independent pathways that may not cross-talk, but we would not have any idea until we have larger data-set.  This study provides a small subset of that information in a particular population in Taiwan.  This study contributes additional information to the overall understanding of the interaction between these two pathways.

The study is conduct in a clean fashion without significant issues.  

I would only suggest that some of the English could be improved to provide more active voice and better clarity.

Otherwise, I would recommend the paper be accepted with grammar revision.  

Author Response

Point 1: I would only suggest that some of the English could be improved to provide more active voice and better clarity. ʉ۬

Response 1:  English language editing of revised manuscript was done as suggested.

Reviewer 2 Report

In this article, authors present a retrospective study of lung cancer specimen, concluding that PD-L1 expression does not affect the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. In my opinion the manuscript is pretty well-written and flowing and could be useful for clinicians.

Author Response

Point 1: In this article, authors present a retrospective study of lung cancer specimen, concluding that PD-L1 expression does not affect the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs. In my opinion the manuscript is pretty well-written and flowing and could be useful for clinicians. 


Response 1: We appreciate the reviewer’s enthusiastic comments about our research article.

 

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.

 

Back to TopTop