Next Article in Journal
Increased Progesterone on the Day of Administration of hCG in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Affects the Expression of HOXA10 in Primates’ Endometrial Receptivity
Previous Article in Journal
Galactomannan Pentasaccharide Produced from Copra Meal Enhances Tight Junction Integration of Epithelial Tissue through Activation of AMPK
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 7
Issue 4
10.3390/biomedicines7040082
Due to scheduled maintenance work on our database systems, there may be short service disruptions on this website between 10:00 and 11:00 CEST on June 14th.
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cyst Reduction in a Polycystic Kidney Disease Drosophila Model Using Smac Mimics

by
Cassandra Millet-Boureima
1,
Ramesh Chingle
2,
William D. Lubell
2 and
Chiara Gamberi
1,*
1
Biology Department, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada
2
Département de Chimie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2019, 7(4), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040082
Submission received: 21 September 2019 / Revised: 11 October 2019 / Accepted: 15 October 2019 / Published: 18 October 2019
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is an inherited malady affecting 12.5 million people worldwide. Therapeutic options to treat PKD are limited, due in part to lack of precise knowledge of underlying pathological mechanisms. Mimics of the second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac) have exhibited activity as antineoplastic agents and reported recently to ameliorate cysts in a murine ADPKD model, possibly by differentially targeting cystic cells and sparing the surrounding tissue. A first-in-kind Drosophila PKD model has now been employed to probe further the activity of novel Smac mimics. Substantial reduction of cystic defects was observed in the Malpighian (renal) tubules of treated flies, underscoring mechanistic conservation of the cystic pathways and potential for efficient testing of drug prototypes in this PKD model. Moreover, the observed differential rescue of the anterior and posterior tubules overall, and within their physiologically diverse intermediate and terminal regions implied a nuanced response in distinct tubular regions contingent upon the structure of the Smac mimic. Knowledge gained from studying Smac mimics reveals the capacity for the Drosophila model to precisely probe PKD pharmacology highlighting the value for such critical evaluation of factors implicated in renal function and pathology.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) induces the formation of cysts along the entire renal tubule, predominantly at the terminal region and the collector tubule, as well as extra-renal manifestations [1]. Inherited through a monogenic pattern with the most frequent mutations affecting the PKD1 or PKD2 gene, ADPKD displays high heterogeneity in both phenotype and speed of progression [1]. Abnormal proliferation of the epithelial tubular cells during development gives rise to cysts prenatally. Cysts become more numerous with age, gradually enlarging and filling with fluid [1]. Animal models of PKD have been invaluable for defining disease progression and identifying key molecular alterations; however, the precise mechanisms underlying disease pathology remain to be elucidated at the molecular level [2]. The most recent addition to the arsenal of PKD animal models has been the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. Mutants for the Bicaudal C (BicC) gene (hereby BicC flies) were found to recapitulate key molecular features of PKD, including myc over-expression and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway activation [3]. Consistent with ADPKD, the BicC flies formed cysts along the entire length of the tubule, with higher frequency at the intermediate, terminal and collector tubule regions [3]. Moreover, analogous to vertebrate PKD [4,5,6,7,8], pharmacological treatment of BicC flies with rapamycin transiently reduced cysts [3]. Consistent with the relevance of the BicC phenotype in PKD, BICC1 mRNA and Bicc1 protein orthologues were respectively found to decrease in kidneys from PKD1 patients and Pkd1-/- mice [3]. Thus, PKD1 dysfunction is associated with decreased BicC function.
An excellent model of human renal function, the fly has high genetic conservation and a streamlined anatomy (reviewed in [9]). In contrast to the human kidney, which contains one million tubular filtering units called nephrons, Drosophila harbors two pairs of Malpighian tubules (MTs), which are functionally equivalent to the tubular portion of the nephron. Suitable to the open circulatory system of the fly, the renal system does not have glomeruli and possesses nephrocytes, which exhibit re-adsorptive function analogous to the human glomerular podocytes [9]. Originating from the interface between the mid- and hind-gut, the MTs are asymmetrical with longer tubules anteriorly and shorter ones posteriorly. Reminiscent of the different nephron types in the human kidney, the anterior and posterior MTs have distinct transcriptomes [10]. Like the human renal tubules, MTs can be divided into distinct regions, which in the fly are called proximal, intermediate, and terminal. The proximal region excretes fluid into the tubules, the intermediate region secretes potassium chloride and water, and the terminal region is responsible for sodium and, possibly, water reabsorption [9]. One key advantage of the fly renal system is that the MTs are anatomically distinct, float freely in the fly body cavity, and can be cleanly micro-dissected and examined in their entirety.
Antineoplastic mimics of the second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac, also called the direct inhibitor of apoptosis-binding protein with low pI, DIABLO) have been used to sensitize cancer cells to apoptosis by targeting inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs, [11,12]). Highly conserved, IAP proteins play a key role in balancing cell survival and cell death through multiple intersecting cellular pathways. Implicated in innate immunity [13,14], IAPs are often upregulated in cancer [15]. First discovered in insect baculovirus as inhibitors of cellular apoptosis which enable viral replication, IAPs were found in both vertebrates and invertebrates [16] (reviewed in [11]). The best-known mammalian IAPs are X-linked IAP (XIAP), cellular IAP1 (cIAP1) and cIAP2 [11]. The Drosophila genome encodes four IAPs, Diap1, Diap2, dBruce and Deterin [17,18,19]. Multiple proteins have been shown to antagonize IAPs. First discovered in Drosophila, three proteins, Reaper [20], Head involution defective (Hid, [21]) and Grim [22], can induce apoptosis when transfected into mammalian cells, which demonstrated functional conservation of the apoptotic cellular machinery [23]. Additional fly IAP antagonists are Jafrac [24], Sickle [25,26,27] and HtrA2 [28,29,30]. The search for the mammalian IAP antagonists yielded Smac/DIABLO [31,32], Omi/HtrA2 [33], apoptosis-related protein in the TGFβ signaling pathway (ARTS, [34]) and XIAP-associated factor 1 (XAF1, [35]). IAP antagonists function through an RHG motif, named after the prototypical Reaper, Hid and Grim fly proteins. In the case of the well-studied human Smac/DIABLO and fly Hid IAP antagonists, pro-apoptotic stimuli induce proteolytic cleavage exposing the RHG motif at the N-terminus enabling interaction with IAP proteins [36,37] and triggering their ubiquitination and degradation. In the appropriate cellular context, IAP degradation can eventually lead to cell death either by way of caspase activation or via tumor necrosis factor (TNF) signaling [11,38,39]. The discovery that the Smac/DIABLO N-terminal peptide H-Ala-Val-Pro-Ile-NH2 can recapitulate the pro-apoptotic function of the entire protein has inspired the development of various Smac mimics, which enable sensitization of neoplastic cells to apoptosis [12].
Based on the premise that ADPKD is considered in part a neoplastic condition [40,41], and that various TNF complex components were upregulated in Pkd1-/- mouse embryonic kidney (MEK) cells, the Smac mimic and birinapant analog GT13072 was used to induce TNF-α-dependent cell death in both cultured cells and a rat model of PKD [42]. The pro-apoptotic properties of GT13072 were specific for the TNF-positive renal epithelial cystic cells and spared surrounding non-cystic cells, offering therapeutic potential to ablate renal cystic cells to delay cystogenesis [42].
The TNF pathway is highly conserved in the fly [43,44,45,46,47,48]. The capacity for Smac mimics to reduce MT cystogenesis has now been tested in the BicC cystic flies. The prototypical H-Ala-Val-Pro-Ile-NH2 (peptide 1, Figure 1) and three Smac mimics 2–4 were administered to the BicC cystic flies to reduce cyst formation.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Fly Lines and Genetics

Fly breeding and care were previously described in detail [3]. In brief, flies were grown on cornmeal agar (Jazzmix, Fisher Scientific Canada, Ottawa, ON) at 25 °C and aged as indicated. OregonR (OreR) wild-type flies were maintained as in [3]. BicC mutants were generated by crossing Df(2L)RA5/CyO (BicC-encompassing deletion obtained from Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center) virgin females with one of the two hypomorphic BicC mutations, BicCYC33/CyO and BicCIIF34/CyO and selecting straight-winged progeny (Df(2L)RA5/BicCYC33, BicCΔ/YC33 and Df(2L)RA5/BicCIIF34, BicCΔ/IIF34). The two BicC allelic combinations produced truncated proteins and sterile BicC flies [3]. Eclosed adult flies were collected every two days to yield 0–2-day old populations and aged as described.

2.2. In Vivo and Ex Vivo Assays

2.2.1. Cystic Index

For the cyst analysis, 0–2-days old flies were aged seven days (i.e., 7–9 days old) and were fed every three days with 2 mL of cornmeal food and equal volumes (50 µL) of either vehicle (water) or an aqueous solution containing peptide 1 or Smac mimic 2–4. Each compound was used at 20 µM and was administered for 20 days (i.e., until 27–29 days old). Malpighian tubules were micro-dissected from 25–50 female flies in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and the number of cysts was scored separately in anterior and posterior tubules and assigned to each tubular region (i.e., proximal, intermediate and terminal [3,9]), as follows. At one extremity, the proximal region consists of about 15% of the tubule length, tends to have an opaque whitish content (posterior tubule), is thinner than adjacent regions (especially in the anterior tubule) and often exhibits a slight constriction terminally. The neighboring intermediate region has darker contents and consists of about 55% of the tubule length. The terminal region is often translucent, directly connected to the collecting tubule, and consists of the remaining 30% of the tubule length. Cysts were considered tubular deformations creating uni- or bi-laterally protuberant pouches. Extra-branches (as in [3]) were counted as cysts. Values were plotted using the Prism 8.0 software (Graphpad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) as nested distributions. Statistical analyses were performed as unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction (the populations may not have equal standard deviations). The raw data counts are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

2.2.2. Microscopy

Malpighian tubules from appropriately aged and treated flies were micro-dissected in 1× PBS, equilibrated into a 3:1 1× PBS:glycerol solution and photographed on a Leica MZ FLIII Fluorescence Stereomicroscope with Leica MZ series 10×/21B Widefield adjustable eyepieces equipped with a Canon DS126201 EOS 5D MARK II camera, using visible light. Canon raw files (CR2) were converted into TIF format using the Adobe Lightroom 3.2 software (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA).

2.3. General Synthetic Methods

Chemicals were used as received from commercial sources without further purification unless stated otherwise. All glassware was stored in the oven or flame-dried and let cool under an inert atmosphere prior to use. Anhydrous solvents (DCM, and DMF) were obtained by passage through solvent filtration systems (Glass-Contour, Irvine, CA, USA). Silica gel chromatography was performed using 230–400 mesh silica gel (Silicycle), and TLC was on glass-backed silica plates visualizing the developed chromatogram by UV absorbance or staining with ceric ammonium molybdate or potassium permanganate solutions. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra (1H and 13C) were recorded on a Bruker AV 500 spectrometer and referenced to residual solvent in CD3OD (3.31 ppm, 49.0 ppm). Coupling constant J values and chemical shifts were measured in Hertz (Hz) and parts per million (ppm). Infrared spectra were recorded in the neat on a Perkin Elmer Spectrum One FTIR instrument and are reported in reciprocal centimeter (cm–1). Liquid chromatography−mass spectrometry (LC−MS) was performed on an Agilent Technologies 1200 series instrument in positive electrospray ionization (ESI)-time-of-flight (TOF) mode at the Université de Montréal Mass Spectrometry Facility. Sodium and proton adducts ([M + Na]+ and [M + H]+) were used for empirical formula confirmation. The peptide H-Ala-Val-Pro-Ile-NH2 (1), Smac mimics 2 and 3, and aza-cyclohexylglycinyl-l-proline benzhydrylamide (8), all were synthesized according to published methods [49]. N-Boc-N-Methyl-l-alanine and diisopropyl ethyl amine (DIEA) were purchased from Aldrich or Alfa Aesar and used without further purification. Benzotriazol-1-yl-oxytripyrrolidino-phosphoniumhexafluoro-phosphate (PyBop) was purchased from GL Biochem™, recrystallized prior to use from dry CH2Cl2/Et2O (melting point, 156 °C), and stored in the dark.
N-Methyl alaninyl-aza-cyclohexylglycinyl-l-proline benzhydrylamide (4). A solution of aza-cyclohexylglycinyl-l-proline benzhydrylamide (8, 1 eq., 65 mg, 0.155 mmol, prepared according to [49]) and DIEA (2 eq., 40 mg, 53 µL, 0.309 mmol) was added to a solution of N-(tert-butoxycarbonyl)-N-methyl-l-alanine (1.2 eq., 38 mg, 0.186 mmol) and PyBOP (1.5 eq., 121 mg, 0.233 mmol) in DMF (3 mL), and the mixture was stirred overnight. The volatiles were removed under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in EtOAc (10 mL), washed with 5 mL of saturated aqueous NaHCO3 and brine (10 mL), dried over Na2SO4, filtered, and evaporated. Without further purification, the residue was dissolved in a 25% solution of trifluoroacetic acid in dichloromethane (2 mL) and stirred for 2 h. The volatiles were removed under vacuum. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2 and the solution was evaporated. The residue was suspended in 2 mL of 1N HCl, stirred for 30 min, and freeze-dried to give the hydrochloride salt as off white solid, which was purified by RP-HPLC on a reverse-phase Gemini® C18 column (Phenomenex® Inc., pore size: 110 Å, particle size: 5 μm, 250 × 21.2 mm) using a binary solvent system consisting of a gradient of 5–60% MeOH [0.1% formic acid (FA)] in water (0.1% FA) with a flow rate of 10.0 mL/min and UV detection at 214 nm. The desired fractions were combined and freeze-dried to white fluffy powder: azapeptide 4 (5.2 mg, 0.01 mmol, 7%): mp 93–94 °C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CD3OD) δ 8.40 (s, 1H), 7.45–7.20 (m, 10H), 6.24 (s, 1H), 4.56–4.42 (m, 1H), 4.05–3.88 (m, 1H), 3.69–3.42 (m, 2H), 2.59–2.43 (m, 3H), 2.43–2.31 (m, 1H), 2.26–2.14 (m, 1H), 2.14–2.00 (m, 1H), 2.00–1.91 (m, 1H), 1.91–1.62 (m, 6H), 1.53–1.36 (m, 5H), 1.35–1.03 (m, 5H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, MeOD) δ 174.1, 171.2, 161.4, 143.2, 139.1, 129.5 (2C), 129.4 (2C), 129.3 (2C), 128.8 (2C), 128.4, 128.2, 63.6, 57.9, 57.4, 49.6, 31.5, 31.3, 30.8, 26.9, 26.72 (2C), 26.69 (2C), 26.5, 17.5; IR (neat) vmax/cm−1 2929, 1638, 1532, 1495, 1449, 1406, 1344, 1323, 1095; HRMS m/z calculated for C29H40N5O3 [M+H]+ 506.3126; found 506.3139. (Supplementary File S1). The logarithm of the partition coefficient (clogP) values were calculated using Chemdraw 17.0 (Perkin Elmer, 2017, Waltham, MA, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Chemistry

Smac activity has been correlated to binding to IAP proteins and mimicked by its N-terminal four residue amide sequence (H-Ala-Val-Pro-Ile-NH2, 1, Figure 1) [50,51,52]. The purported turn conformation adopted about the central Val-Pro dipeptide in this sequence has led to the synthesis of various constrained analogs, exhibiting enhanced potency [12,53]. Noting the similar conformational preferences of indolizidinone amino acid and aza-amino acyl proline turn mimics [54,55,56,57], and the relative ease of synthesis of the latter, a series of aza-analogs were synthesized and certain were shown to induce cell death by a caspase-9 mediated apoptotic pathway in cancer cell cultures [49,57]. Notably, aza-methanopipecolate and aza-cyclohexylglycine analogs 2 and 3 were synthesized using pericyclic chemistry on the diazo dicarbonyl moiety of an azopeptide to examine the conformation of the Val residue in 1 [49,58,59]. Specifically, the Alder-ene reaction of cyclohexadiene and the Diels-Alder reaction of cyclopentadiene on N-(Cbz)azoglycinyl-proline benzhydrylamide 5 gave the unsaturated azapeptides 6 and 7, which were hydrogenated with concomitant removal of the benzyloxycarbonyl group, coupled to N-protected alanine, and deprotected (Scheme 1, [49]). Considering the tolerance of N-methyl-alanine for alanine in the terminal position [60], a similar approach was used to prepare N-methyl analog 4 by hydrogenation of azapeptide 7, coupling of the resulting aza-cyclohexylglycinyl-L-proline benzhydrylamide (8) to N-(Boc)-N-methylalanine using PyBop and cleavage of the Boc group with TFA in DCM. In cultured MCF7 breast cancer cells, aza-cyclohexylglycine analog 3 induced up to 60% cell death relative to vehicle [49].

3.1.1. Effect of Smac Mimic Administration In Vivo

We have previously reported that flies mutant in the BicC gene recapitulate key features of PKD [3]. Considering that Smac mimics showed efficacy at reducing cysts in a rat PKD model [42], the results of Smac mimic administration were tested in the BicC cystic flies using two different allelic combinations. BicC mutant flies were obtained from genetic crosses of heterozygote parents consisting of CyO-balanced flies containing Df(2L)RA5 (Δ, a BicC-encompassing deletion), and either the BicCYC33 or BicCIIF34 alleles similarly balanced with CyO. The BicCΔ/YC33 fly exhibits milder cystic defects than the BicCΔ/IIF34 fly [3]. Straight-winged mutants (BicCΔ/YC33, BicCΔ/IIF34) from crosses were selected within two days of eclosion to yield pools of 0–2 days old flies and aged for seven days (7–9 days old), during which time the flies were kept well-fed by transferring to fresh vials twice (Figure 2). Aged sibling flies were divided into fresh vials containing food spiked with either vehicle (water, 50 µL) or one of the Smac analogs 1–4 at 20 μM (50 µL). Flies were transferred into identical fresh vials every three days. After 20 days of treatment, the Malpighian tubules were micro-dissected from 27–29 day old flies and analyzed ex vivo. Per each condition, cystic deformities were scored using 25–50 female BicCΔ/IIF34 and BicCΔ/YC33 flies (i.e., 50–100 anterior and 50–100 posterior tubules). For each fly, cysts which were found in the two anterior and two posterior tubules were scored and charted as nested plots using the Prism 8.0 (Graphpad) software (Figures 3–6). Vehicle-treated flies presented several cysts in both the anterior and posterior MTs, especially in the terminal and intermediate regions, and fewer cysts in the proximal region, as reported previously [3]. Similar to PKD patients [1], a variable number of cysts was found in different individuals [3]. In general, Smac-mimics appeared to reduce tubular cysts in both BicC allelic combinations (Table 1, Table 2).
Effects of Smac mimic administration were recorded as overall cyst reduction (Table 1, Table 2). Nested plots were used to represent individual variability in cyst number in the analyzed fly populations. Administration of peptide 1 to BicCΔ/YC33 flies (n = 50) reduced cystic deformities respectively by 44% and 20% (228 vs. 127 cysts and 276 vs. 220 cysts, p = 0.0005 and 0.0457) in the anterior and posterior tubules, respectively (Table 1, Figure 3A,B). Administration of mimic 2 to BicCΔ/YC33 flies (n = 50) reduced tubular cysts by 24% and 34% (216 vs. 165 cysts, p = 0.0324 and 244 vs. 162 cysts, p = 0.0017) in the anterior and posterior tubules, respectively (Table 1, Figure 3A,B). Administration of mimic 3 to BicCΔ/YC33 flies (n = 50) reduced cysts in the anterior and posterior tubules respectively by 21% and 34% (195 vs. 153 cysts, p = 0.1028 and 238 vs. 156 cysts, p = 0.0014, Table 1, Figure 3A,B). Finally, administration of mimic 4 to BicCΔ/YC33 flies (n = 50) reduced cysts in the anterior and posterior tubules respectively by 31% and 18% (134 vs. 93 cysts, p = 0.0553 and 152 vs. 124 cysts, p = 0.1877, Table 1, Figure 3A,B).
The analogs were next administered to the BicCΔ/IIF34 flies carrying the allelic combination which produced a more severe phenotype. Treatment with peptide 1 decreased cystic deformations respectively by 44% and 37% (total 357 vs. 199 cysts and 433 vs. 272 cysts, p < 0.0001 and 0.0002, respectively) in the anterior and posterior tubules of the micro-dissected BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (n = 50, Table 2, Figure 4A,B). Administration of mimic 2 to BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (n = 50) reduced cystic deformations by 39% in the anterior (233 vs. 142 cysts, p = 0.0011) and by 33% in the posterior (302 vs. 202 cysts, p = 0.0020) tubules (Table 2, Figure 4A,B). Administration of mimic 3 to BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (n = 25) had a milder and highly variable effect on the renal tubules and reduced cystic deformities by 11% (114 vs. 102 cysts, p = 0.6317) and 21% (155 vs. 122 cysts, p = 0.2285) in the anterior and posterior tubules respectively (Table 2, Figure 4A,B), below statistical relevance thresholds. Finally, administration of mimic 4 to BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (n = 50) reduced cysts in the anterior and posterior tubules by 40% (199 vs. 119 cysts, p = 0.0005) and 38% (243 vs. 151 cysts, p = 0.0002) respectively (Table 2, Figure 4A,B). Parallel respective administration of analogs 1–4 to control, non-cystic OreR wild type flies did not change MT morphology.
Distinct MT regions in both the anterior and posterior tubules appeared to respond differentially to the Smac mimics. The cyst location was thus specifically mapped in the proximal, intermediate and terminal regions of the anterior and posterior tubules respectively (Table 3 and Table 4), and individual variable cyst numbers similarly plotted (Figure 5 and Figure 6). Absolute numbers for the cysts in each region described below are listed in Table S2.

3.1.2. Smac Mimics Differentially Affect Distinct Regions of the MTs

Administration of peptide 1 to the milder allelic combination BicCΔ/YC33 (n = 50) reduced cysts in the terminal and intermediate regions of the anterior tubules respectively by 53% and 34% (total 122 vs. 57, 104 vs. 69 cysts, p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0381, Table 3, Figure 5A). In the proximal region of the anterior tubules, two cysts were found in the control versus one cyst in the treated samples, precluding statistical analyses. In the posterior tubules, administration of peptide 1 diminished cysts in the intermediate region by 26% (total 109 vs. 80 cysts, p = 0.0449). In the terminal and proximal regions, a trend toward decreased cysts was observed, albeit without reaching a statistical threshold for significance (respectively 108 vs. 84 cysts, 22% reduction, p = 0.1405, and 59 vs. 56 cysts, 5% reduction, p = 0.7531, Table 3, Figure 5A).
Administration of peptide 1 to BicCΔ/IIF34 flies reduced cysts in the anterior tubules by 40% and 48% (total 156 vs. 94 and 193 vs. 100 cysts, p = 0.0038 and p < 0.0001) in the terminal and intermediate regions, respectively (Table 4, Figure 6A). In the proximal region of the anterior tubules, a trend of cyst reduction was observed, albeit fewer cysts (eight and five in vehicle- and peptide 1-treated tubules) and high individual variability precluded a margin of confidence. In the posterior tubules, administration of peptide 1 reduced cysts in the terminal, intermediate and proximal regions by 32%, 41% and 39% (total 180 vs. 122, 167 vs. 98, 86 vs. 52 cysts, p = 0.0022, 0.0008 and 0.0150), respectively (Table 4, Figure 6A).
Treatment with mimic 2 diminished cysts in the terminal region of the anterior tubules of BicCΔ/YC33 flies (n = 50) by 41% (114 vs. 67 cysts, p = 0.0006). In the intermediate region, a mild 5% reduction was observed that did not approach a statistical significance threshold (102 vs. 97 cysts, p = 0.7599, Table 3, Figure 5B). Precluding statistical analyses, no (control) and one cyst (mimic 2-treated) were detected in the proximal region of the anterior tubules. In contrast, in the posterior tubule, administration of mimic 2 reduced cysts in the terminal, intermediate and proximal regions by 32%, 29% and 47% (101 vs. 69 cysts, p = 0.0125, 96 vs. 68 cysts, p = 0.0389 and 47 vs. 25 cysts, p = 0.0057), respectively (Table 3, Figure 5B).
Administration of mimic 2 to the more severely cystic BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (n = 50) reduced cysts in the terminal and intermediate regions of the anterior tubules by 37% and 41% (average 115 vs. 72 cysts, p = 0.0161, 118 vs. 70 cysts, p = 0.0045), respectively. No cysts were found in the proximal regions of control and treated tubules (Table 4, Figure 6B). Administration of mimic 2 reduced cysts in the terminal and proximal regions of the posterior tubules by 32% and 43% (134 vs. 91 cysts, p = 0.0086 and 69 vs. 39 cysts, p = 0.0080), respectively. The intermediate region displayed a 27% reduction that approached statistical significance threshold (99 vs. 72 cysts, p = 0.0703, Table 4, Figure 6B).
After treatment with mimic 3, the BicCΔ/YC33 flies (n = 50) harbored 40% fewer cysts in the terminal region of the anterior tubules (99 vs. 59 cysts, p = 0.0041). In the intermediate region, the effect was negligible (2% reduction, 96 vs. 94 cysts, p = 0.9072). No cysts were detected in the proximal region of both control and treated tubules (Table 3, Figure 5C). On the contrary, administration of mimic 3 reduced strongly cysts in the terminal and intermediate regions of the posterior tubules by 45% and 30% (100 vs. 55 cysts, p = 0.0007 and 90 vs. 63 cysts, p = 0.0465), respectively. The proximal region displayed a trend towards cyst reduction with high individual variability (21% reduction, 48 vs. 38 cysts, p = 0.2431, Table 3, Figure 5C).
Mimic 3 did not ameliorate the more severely cystic BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (n = 25). After treatment with mimic 3, the BicCΔ/IIF34 flies displayed respectively 11% and 9% (61 vs. 54 cysts, p = 0.6746 and 53 vs. 48 cysts, p = 0.7140) fewer cysts in the terminal and intermediate regions of the anterior tubules; no cysts were observed in the proximal region of both control and treated tubules (Table 4, Figure 6C). Similarly, mimic 3 caused respectively 21%, 10% and 40% (75 vs. 59 cysts, p = 0.2429, 50 vs. 45 cysts, p = 0.7038 and 30 vs. 18 cysts, p = 0.1325) reductions in cysts in the terminal, intermediate and proximal regions of the posterior tubules (Table 4, Figure 6C).
Mimic 4 reduced cysts in the intermediate region of the anterior tubules of BicCΔ/YC33 flies (n = 50) by 36% (85 vs. 55 cysts, p = 0.0461). In the terminal region, a 20% decrease was observed, that did not reach a threshold of statistical significance (49 vs. 39 cysts, p = 0.3377). No cysts were detected in the proximal region of both control and treated tubules (Table 3, Figure 5D). Treatment with mimic 4 reduced cysts in the intermediate region of the posterior tubules by 33% (98 vs. 66 cysts, p = 0.0130), but did not reduce cysts in the terminal and proximal regions (Table 3, Figure 5D).
Upon treatment with mimic 4, cysts were lessened in the terminal and intermediate regions of the anterior tubules of BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (n = 50) by 38% and 42% (92 vs. 57 cysts, p = 0.0195 and 106 vs. 62 cysts, p = 0.0014), respectively (Table 4, Figure 6D). Precluding statistical analysis, only one cyst was detected in the proximal region of control tubules and no cysts in the treated tubules. Administration of mimic 4 reduced cysts in the terminal region of the posterior tubules by 51% (113 vs. 55 cysts, p < 0.0001). Less cysts were also scored in the intermediate and proximal regions, although values did not reach the significance threshold (respectively 22% reduction, 90 vs. 70 cysts, p = 0.1231, and 35% reduction, 40 vs. 26 cysts, p = 0.1069, Table 4, Figure 6D).
Ineffective cyst reduction could be partly due to flies refusing to ingest the Smac mimics. To assess their ingestion, the analogs were mixed with food and dye, and fed to the flies for four days. The green dye could be seen through the semi-transparent abdominal cuticle of the BicC flies for all mimics, confirming analog ingestion (Figure S1). As a measure of hydrophilicity, the clogP values were calculated for the different Smac mimics (Figure 1) and found to be sufficiently low to be consistent with absorption: 1 (0.7), 2 (3.9), 3 (5.0), 4 (5.4). Together these results support the conclusion that the Smac analogs may have differential activities and/or processing.

4. Discussion

A systematic analysis of the influences of the Smac mimic H-Ala-Val-Pro-Ile-NH2 (1) and constrained analogs 2–4 on renal cystogenesis has been performed using the novel BicC fly model to recapitulate features of PKD [3]. Two allelic combinations for BicC were used that yield cystic phenotypes of different severity, namely BicCΔ/YC33 and BicCΔ/IIF34. Previously, the Smac mimic GT13072 reduced cystogenesis in a rat ADPKD model [42]. In the BicC flies, Smac mimics 1–4 ameliorated similarly the cystic condition with the strongest effects displayed in the more severely affected BicCΔ/IIF34 genotype. Peptide 1 exhibited the highest overall efficacy reducing cyst occurrence by 20–44% across genotypes at the anterior and posterior tubules. Moreover, aza-methanopipecolate 2 caused a 24–39% reduction of cysts. Aza-cyclohexylglycine 3 displayed least efficacy, but still improved significantly the posterior tubules of the BicCΔ/YC33 flies. The related N-methyl-alaninyl-aza-cyclohexylglycine analog 4 exhibited differential activity in the two BicC mutants, reducing cysts by ~40% in both tubules of the BicCΔ/IIF34 flies. In contrast, analog 4 only showed a trend towards reducing cysts in the anterior tubule of the BicCΔ/YC33 flies close to the significance threshold (p = 0.0553). The Smac mimics tested appeared to differentially affect the anterior and posterior tubule pairs overall, consistent with the report of the latter having distinct transcriptomes [10] and thus different physiological specialization. Mimics 1, 2 and 3 were found to induce death of 20% (1, 2) and 60% (3) of cultured MCF7 adenocarcinoma cells [49]. Their efficacy in other PKD models and patients is unknown. Smac mimics function in context-dependent ways, likely through different IAPs to affect apoptosis via several mechanisms [12]. Due to its methyl group, N-methyl-alaninyl-aza-cyclohexylglycine analog 4 was expected to be more stable than aza-cyclohexylglycine 3 in vivo [61,62,63], which was consistent with the observed higher cyst-reducing activity.
The tubular sections responded differentially to treatment with the Smac mimics. The terminal region consistently exhibited better improvement, especially in the weaker BicCΔ/YC33 allelic combination. The flies were shown to ingest the Smac mimics. The clogP values of mimics 1–4 were also within the range consistent with effective absorption. The distinct pharmacological responses observed at different regions of the MTs may be related to variability in absorption, metabolism and response to Smac mimics within cystic cells in such regions. Regional specialization of fly MTs has been observed despite the tubular epithelium being composed by only two major cell types (reviewed in [9,64]). Cystogenesis may perturb cells and reduce the threshold for initiating cell death pathways either through caspase-dependent apoptosis or the TNF signaling pathway. The contribution of apoptosis to the early phases of ADPKD is a matter of debate [65]; however, the TNF pathway has been implicated in ADPKD-type renal cystogenesis and suggested to be the primary target of Smac mimics in a rat model of Pkd1-dependent ADPKD [42]. The results presented here predict that the BicC mutation may feature dysregulated TNF signaling in the epithelial cells of the MTs, as observed in ADPKD-type cystogenesis. The expression of TNF (Eiger) and TNF pathway components in the MT and their respective contributions to tubular function are however unknown. The human BicC orthologue BICC1 has been found to be genetically downstream of the main PKD1 gene [3]. The pharmacological response to Smac mimics was herein demonstrated to be conserved in the fly illustrating further the phenotypic and molecular similarities between PKD1-induced and BicC-induced renal cystogenesis.
Notably, pharmacological binding sites have been found to be conserved in Drosophila [66]. Chemical probing in the fly in vivo may thus rapidly pinpoint the involvement of specific pathways with complementarity to genetic analyses, indicate conserved biological activity of drug-prototypes, and provide a rapid read-out for effectiveness of pharmacological modulation of specific pathways involved in cystic pathogenesis. The Smac mimics affected different tubular regions differentially. Considering that such specificity may be conserved to humans, the development of personalized pharmacological treatments for cystic renal diseases such as PKD will benefit from precise knowledge of the cyst-ameliorating potential of different Smac mimics.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9059/7/4/82/s1. Supplementary file S1: spectral and chromatographic characterization of mimic 4, Table S1: Cystic index analysis raw data, Table S2: Regional cystic index for BicC flies. Figure S1: Analog feeding control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.M.B., W.D.L., and C.G.; methodology, C.M.B., R.C., W.D.L. and C.G.; validation, C.M.B., R.C., W.D.L. and C.G.; formal analysis, C.M.B., R.C., W.D.L. and C.G.; investigation, C.M.B., and R.C.; resources, W.D.L and C.G.; data curation, C.M.B., R.C. and C.G.; writing—original draft preparation, C.M.B., W.D.L. and C.G.; writing—review and editing, C.M.B., R.C., W.D.L. and C.G.; visualization, C.M.B., R.C. and C.G.; supervision, W.D.L. and C.G.; project administration, W.D.L. and C.G.; funding acquisition, W.D.L. and C.G.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery Research Project #04079, the Fonds de recherche nature et technologie Quebec for the Centre in Green Chemistry and Catalysis (FRQNT-2020-RS4-265155-CCVC), the Université de Montréal to W.D.L., and a Concordia University CUPFA Professional Development Grant to C.G.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank C. Charbonneau (Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, IRIC, Université de Montréal) and C. Law (Centre for Microscopy and Cellular Imaging, CMCI, Concordia University) for sharing their expertise in microscopy and analyses; J. Oliver, T.B.U. Le and S. He for help with fly work; J. Pelletier (Université de Montréal), M. Therrien (IRIC) and their groups, for welcoming hospitality and shared resources; The Bloomington Drosophila Stock Center for fly lines.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bergmann, C.; Guay-Woodford, L.M.; Harris, P.C.; Horie, S.; Peters, D.J.M.; Torres, V.E. Polycystic kidney disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2018, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Happé, H.; Peters, J.D.M. Translational research in ADPKD: Lessons from animal models. Nat. Rev. Neph. 2014, 10, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gamberi, C.; Hipfner, D.R.; Trudel, M.; Lubell, W.D. Bicaudal C mutation causes myc and TOR pathway up-regulation and polycystic kidney disease-like phenotypes in Drosophila. PLoS Gen. 2017, 13, e1006694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tao, Y.; Kim, J.; Shrier, R.W.; Edelstein, C.L. Rapamycin markedly slows disease progression in a rat model of polycystic kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2005, 16, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shillingford, J.M.; Murcia, N.S.; Larson, C.H.; Low, S.H.; Hedgepeth, R.; Brown, N.; Flask, C.A.; Novick, A.C.; Goldfarb, D.A.; Kramer-Zucker, A.; et al. The mTOR pathway is regulated by polycystin-1, and its inhibition reverses renal cystogenesis in polycystic kidney disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5466–5471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Wahl, P.R.; Serra, A.L.; Le Hir, M.; Molle, K.D.; Hall, M.N.; Wuthrich, R.P. Inhibition of mTOR with sirolimus slows disease progression in Han:SPRD rats with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 2006, 21, 598–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, M.; Wahl, P.R.; Le Hir, M.; Wackerie-Men, Y.; Wuthrich, R.P. Everolimus retards cyst growth and preserves kidney function in a rodent model for polycystic kidney disease. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2007, 30, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shillingford, J.M.; Piontek, K.B.; Germino, G.G.; Weimbs, T. Rapamycin ameliorates PKD resulting from conditional inactivation of Pkd1. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Millet-Boureima, C.; Marroquin, J.P.; Gamberi, C. Modeling renal disease “on the fly”. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wang, J.; Kean, L.; Yang, J.; Allan, A.K.; Davies, S.A.; Herzyk, P.; Dow, J.A.T. Function-informed transcriptome analysis of Drosophila renal tubule. Genome Biology 2004, 5, R69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lalaoui, N.; Vaux, D.L. Recent advances in understanding inhibitor of apoptosis proteins. F1000Res. 2018, 7, 30631429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Cong, H.; Xu, L.; Wu, Y.; Qu, Z.; Bian, T.; Zhang, W.; Xing, C.; Zhuang, C. Inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) antagonists in anticancer agent discovery: Current status and perspectives. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 5750–5772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Damgaard, R.B.; Nachbur, U.; Yabal, M.; Wong, W.W.; Fiil, B.K.; Kastirr, M.; Rieser, E.; Rickard, J.A.; Bankovacki, A.; Peschel, C.; et al. The ubiquitin ligase XIAP recruits LUBAC for NOD2 signaling in inflammation and innate immunity. Mol. Cell 2012, 46, 746–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Damgaard, R.B.; Fiil, B.K.; Speckmann, C.; Yabal, M.; zur Stadt, U.; Bekker-Jensen, S.; Jost, P.J.; Ehl, S.; Mailand, N.; Gyrd-Hansen, M. Disease-causing mutations in the XIAPBIR2 domain impair NOD2-dependent immune signalling. EMBO Mol. Med. 2013, 5, 1278–1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fulda, S.; Vucic, D. Targeting IAP proteins for therapeutic intervention in cancer. Nat. Rev. Drg. Disc. 2012, 11, 109–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Duckett, C.S.; Nava, V.E.; Gedrich, R.W.; Clem, R.J.; Van Dongen, J.L.; Gilfillan, M.C.; Shiels, H.; Hardwick, J.; Thompson, C.B. A conserved family of cellular genes related to the baculovirus iap gene and encoding apoptosis inhibitors. EMBO J. 1996, 15, 2685–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hay, B.A.; Wassarman, D.A.; Rubin, G.M. Drosophila homologs of baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis proteins function to block cell death. Cell 1995, 83, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jones, G.; Jones, D.; Zhou, L.; Steller, H.; Chu, Y. Deterin, a new inhibitor of apoptosis from Drosophila melanogaster. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 22157–22165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vernooy, S.Y.; Chow, V.; Su, J.; Verbrugghe, K.; Yang, J.; Cole, S.; Olson, M.R.; Hay, B.A. Drosophila Bruce can potently suppress Rpr- and Grim-dependent but not Hid-dependent cell death. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 1164–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. White, K.; Grether, M.E.; Abrams, J.M.; Young, L.; Farrell, K.; Steller, H. Genetic control of programmed cell death in Drosophila. Science 1994, 264, 677–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grether, M.E.; Abrams, J.M.; Agapite, J.; White, K.; Steller, H. The head involution defective gene of Drosophila melanogaster functions in programmed cell death. Genes Dev. 1995, 9, 1694–1708. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chen, P.; Nordstrom, W.; Gish, B.; Abrams, J.M. grim, a novel cell death gene in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 1996, 10, 1773–1782. [Google Scholar]
  23. Verhagen, A.M.; Vaux, D.L. Cell death regulation by the mammalian IAP antagonist Diablo/Smac. Apoptosis 2002, 7, 163–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Tenev, T.; Zachariou, A.; Wilson, R.; Paul, A.; Meier, P. Jafrac2 is an IAP antagonist that promotes cell death by liberating Dronc from DIAP1. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 5118–5129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Christich, A.; Kauppila, S.; Chen, P.; Sogame, N.; Ho, S.; Abrams, J.M. The damage-responsive Drosophila gene sickle encodes a novel IAP binding protein similar to but distinct from reaper, grim, and hid. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 137–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Srinivasula, S.M.; Datta, P.; Kobayashi, M.; Wu, J.; Fujioka, M.; Hegde, R.; Zhang, Z.; Mukattash, R.; Fernandes-Alnemri, T.; Shi, Y.; et al. sickle, a novel Drosophila death gene in the reaper/hid/grim region, encodes an IAP-inhibitory protein. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wing, J.P.; Karres, J.S.; Ogdahl, J.L.; Zhou, L.; Schwartz, L.M.; Nambu, J.R. Drosophila sickle is a novel grim-reaper cell death activator. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 131–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Challa, M.; Malladi, S.; Pellock, B.J.; Dresnek, D.; Varadarajan, S.; Yin, Y.W.; White, K.; Bratton, S.B. Drosophila Omi, a mitonchondrial-localized IAP antagonist and proapoptotic serine protease. EMBO J. 2007, 26, 3144–3156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Igaki, T.; Suzuki, Y.; Tokushige, N.; Aonuma, H.; Takahashi, R.; Miura, M. Evolution of mitochondrial cell death pathway: Proapoptotic role of HtrA2/Omi in Drosophila. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 356, 993–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khan, F.S.; Fujioka, M.; Datta, P.; Fernandes-Alnemri, T.; Jaynes, J.B.; Alnemri, E.S. The interaction of DIAP1 with dOmi/HtrA2 regulates cell death in Drosophila. Cell Death Diff. 2008, 15, 1073–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Du, C.; Fang, M.; Li, Y.; Li, L.; Wang, X. Smac, a mitochondrial protein that promotes cytochrome c-dependent caspase activation by eliminating IAP inhibition. Cell 2000, 102, 33–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Verhagen, A.M.; Ekert, P.G.; Pakusch, M.; Silke, J.; Connolly, L.M.; Reid, G.E.; Moritz, R.L.; Simpson, R.J.; Vaux, D.L. Identification of DIABLO, a mammalian protein that promotes apoptosis by binding to and antagonizing IAP proteins. Cell 2000, 102, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. van Loo, G.; van Gurp, M.; Depuydt, B.; Srinivasula, S.M.; Rodriguez, I.; Alnemri, E.S.; Gevaert, K.; Vandekerckhove, J.; Declercq, W.; Vandenabeele, P. The serine protease Omi/HtrA2 is released from mitochondria during apoptosis. Omi interacts with caspase-inhibitor XIAP and induces enhanced caspase activity. Cell Death Diff. 2002, 9, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Gottfried, Y.; Rotem, A.; Lotan, R.; Steller, H.; Larisch, S. The mitochondrial ARTS protein promotes apoptosis through targeting XIAP. EMBO J. 2004, 23, 1627–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liston, P.; Fong, W.G.; Kelly, N.L.; Toji, S.; Miyazaki, T.; Conte, D.; Tamai, K.; Craig, C.G.; McBurney, M.W.; Korneluk, R.G. Identification of XAF1 as an antagonist of XIAP anti-caspase activity. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2001, 3, 128–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wing, J.P.; Schwartz, L.M.; Nambu, J.R. The RHG motifs of Drosophila Reaper and Grim are important for their distinct cell death-inducing abilities. Mechan. Dev. 2001, 102, 193–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Saita, S.; Nolte, H.; Fiedler, K.U.; Kashkar, H.; Venne, A.S.; Zahedi, R.P.; Kruger, M.; Langer, T. PARL mediates Smac proteolytic maturation in mitochondria to promote apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 19, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Xu, D.; Woodfield, S.E.; Lee, T.V.; Fan, Y.; Antonio, C.; Bergmann, A. Genetic control of programmed cell death (apoptosis) in Drosophila. Fly 2009, 3, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Brenner, D.; Blaser, H.; Mak, T.W. Regulation of tumour necrosis factor signaling: Live or let die. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2015, 15, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Harris, P.C.; Watson, M.L. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: Neoplasia in disguise? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant 1997, 12, 1089–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grantham, J.J. Polycystic kidney disease: Neoplasia in disguise. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1990, 15, 110–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fan, L.X.; Zhou, X.; Sweeney, W.E.; Wallace, D.P.; Avner, E.D.; Grantham, J.J.; Li, X. Smac-mimetic-induced epithelial cell death reduces the growth of renal cysts. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2013, 24, 2010–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Igaki, T.; Kanda, H.; Yamamoto-Goto, Y.; Kanuka, H.; Kuranaga, E.; Aigaki, T.; Miura, M. Eiger, a TNF superfamily ligand that triggers the Drosophila JNK pathway. EMBO J. 2002, 21, 3009–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kanda, H.; Igaki, T.; Kanuka, H.; Yagi, T.; Miura, M. Wengen, a member of the Drosophila Tumor Necrosis Factor receptor superfamily, is required for Eiger signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 28372–28375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Moreno, E.; Yan, M.; Basler, K. Evolution of TNF signaling mechanisms: JNK-dependent apoptosis triggered by Eiger, the Drosophila homolog of the TNF superfamily. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12, 1263–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kauppila, S.; Maaty, W.S.A.; Chen, P.; Tomar, R.S.; Eby, M.T.; Chapo, J.; Chew, S.; Rathore, N.; Zachariah, S.; Sinha, S.K.; et al. Eiger and its receptor, Wengen, comprise a TNF-like system in Drosophila. Oncogene 2003, 22, 4860–4867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Igaki, T.; Miura, M. The Drosophila TNF ortholog Eiger: Emerging physiological roles and evolution of the TNF system. Semin. Immunol. 2014, 26, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Andersen, D.S.; Colombani, J.; Palmerini, V.; Chakrabandhu, K.; Boone, E.; Rothlisberger, M.; Toggweiler, J.; Basler, K.; Mapelli, M.; Hueber, A.; et al. The Drosophila TNF receptor Grindelwald couples loss of cell polarity and neoplastic growth. Nature 2015, 522, 482–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chingle, R.; Ratni, S.; Claing, A.; Lubell, W.D. Application of constrained aza-valine analogs for Smac mimicry. J. Pept. Sci. 2016, 106, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wu, G.; Chai, J.; Suber, T.L.; Wu, J.; Du, C.; Wang, X.; Shi, Y. Structural basis of IAP recognition by Smac/DIABLO. Nature 2000, 408, 1008–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Z.; Sun, C.; Olejniczak, E.T.; Meadows, R.P.; Betz, S.F.; Oost, T.; Herrmann, J.; Wu, J.C.; Fesik, S.W. Structural basis for binding of Smac/DIABLO to the XIAP BIR3 domain. Nature 2000, 408, 1004–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Fadeel, B.; Orrenius, S. Apoptosis: A basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in human disease. J. Int. Med. 2005, 258, 479–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sun, H.; Nikolovska-Coleska, Z.; Yang, C.-Y.; Qian, D.; Lu, J.; Qiu, S.; Bai, L.; Peng, Y.; Cai, Q.; Wang, S. Design of small-molecule peptidic and nonpeptidic Smac mimetics. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1264–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Boeglin, D.; Hamdan, F.F.; Melendez, R.E.; Cluzeau, J.; Laperriere, A.; Heroux, M.; Bouvier, M.; Lubell, W.D. Calcitonin gene-related peptide analogues with aza and indolizidinone amino acid residues reveal conformational requirements for antagonist activity at the human calcitonin gene-related peptide 1 receptor. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 1401–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Bourguet, C.B.; Goupil, E.; Tassy, D.; Hou, X.; Thouin, E.; Polyak, F.; Hebert, T.E.; Claing, A.; Laporte, S.A.; Chemtob, S.; et al. Targeting the prostaglandin F2α receptor for preventing preterm labor with azapeptide tocolytics. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 6085–6097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mir, F.M.; Atmuri, N.D.P.; Bourguet, C.B.; Fores, J.R.; Hou, X.; Chemtob, S.; Lubell, W.D. Paired utility of aza-amino acyl proline and indolizidinone amino acid residues for peptide mimicry: Conception of prostaglandin F2a receptor allosteric modulators that delay preterm birth. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 4500–4525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bourguet, C.B.; Boulay, P.; Claing, A.; Lubell, W.D. Design and synthesis of novel azapeptide activators of apoptosis mediated by caspase-9 in cancer cells. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 3361–3365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chingle, R.; Mulumba, M.; Chung, N.N.; Nguyen, T.M.-D.; Ong, H.; Ballet, S.; Schiller, P.W.; Lubell, W.D. Solid-phase azopeptide Diels-Alder chemistry for aza-pipecolyl residue synthesis to study peptide conformation. J. Ord. Chem. 2019, 84, 6006–6016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chingle, R.; Lubell, W.D. Azopeptides: Synthesis and pericyclic chemistry. Org. Lett. 2015, 17, 5400–5403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Oost, T.; Sun, C.; Armstrong, R.C.; Al-Assaad, A.-S.; Betz, S.F.; Deckwerth, T.L.; Ding, H.; Elmore, S.W.; Meadows, R.P.; Olejniczak, E.T.; et al. Discovery of potent antagonists of the antiapoptotic protein XIAP for the treatment of cancer. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47, 4417–4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chatterjee, J.; Gilon, C.; Hoffman, A.; Kessler, H. N-Methylation of peptides: A new perspective in medicinal chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2008, 41, 1331–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Chatterjee, J.; Rechenmacher, F.; Kessler, H. N-methylation of peptides and proteins: An important element for modulating biological functions. Angewandte Chemie. 2013, 52, 254–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Merlino, F.; Billard, E.; Yousif, A.M.; Di Maro, S.; Brancaccio, D.; Abate, L.; Carotenuto, A.; Bellavita, R.; d’Emmanuele di Villa Bianca, R.; Santicioli, P.; et al. Functional selectivity revealed by N-methylation scanning of human urotensin II and related peptides. J. Med. Chem. 2019, 62, 1455–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Sozen, M.A.; Armstrong, J.D.; Yang, M.; Kaiser, K.; Dow, J.A.T. Functional domains are specified to single-cell resolution in a Drosophila epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 5207–5212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Goilav, B. Apoptosis in polycystic kidney disease. BBA-Mol. Basis Dis. 2011, 1812, 1272–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Ziehm, M.; Kaur, S.; Ivanov, D.K.; Ballester, P.J.; Marcus, D.; Partridge, L.; Thornton, J.M. Drug repurposing for aging research using model organisms. Aging Cell 2017, 16, 1006–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 07 00082 g001 550
Figure 1. Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac) analogs: peptide 1 and mimics 2–4 (Val, aza-residue and modified N-terminal in blue). Logarithm of the partition coefficient (clogP) values were calculated as described below.
Figure 1. Second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases (Smac) analogs: peptide 1 and mimics 2–4 (Val, aza-residue and modified N-terminal in blue). Logarithm of the partition coefficient (clogP) values were calculated as described below.
Biomedicines 07 00082 g001
Biomedicines 07 00082 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Smac mimics 2 and 4 (dienes, azo- and aza-residues in blue).
Scheme 1. Synthesis of Smac mimics 2 and 4 (dienes, azo- and aza-residues in blue).
Biomedicines 07 00082 sch001
Biomedicines 07 00082 g002 550
Figure 2. Testing protocol for Smac-mimic efficacy in cyst reduction. OreR wild-type, BicCΔ/YC33, and BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (0–2 days old) were placed in food-containing vials at age 0–2 days and transferred into fresh vials every three days. Once the age of 7–9 days was reached, flies were placed in vials containing one of each of the Smac-mimics or vehicle control, respectively. Cysts were scored on the micro-dissected MTs after 20 days, when flies reached age 27–29 days.
Figure 2. Testing protocol for Smac-mimic efficacy in cyst reduction. OreR wild-type, BicCΔ/YC33, and BicCΔ/IIF34 flies (0–2 days old) were placed in food-containing vials at age 0–2 days and transferred into fresh vials every three days. Once the age of 7–9 days was reached, flies were placed in vials containing one of each of the Smac-mimics or vehicle control, respectively. Cysts were scored on the micro-dissected MTs after 20 days, when flies reached age 27–29 days.
Biomedicines 07 00082 g002
Biomedicines 07 00082 g003 550
Figure 3. Smac-mimics reduced cysts in BicCΔ/YC33 flies. (A). Representative Malpighian tubules micro-dissected from BicCΔ/YC33 flies treated with either vehicle or analogs 1, 2, 3, and 4 (indicated) were photographed ex vivo. Arrows indicate cysts. In each image, anterior pairs are at the top, posterior pairs at the bottom. Scale bar: 1 mm. (B). Nested plots depicting number of cysts found in the anterior and posterior tubule pairs of vehicle- and Smac mimic-treated cystic flies (indicated), with mean and standard deviation. P values (with Welch’s correction) are indicated. Treatments are indicated with color: vehicle, grey; mimic 1, sepia; 2, blue; 3, dark pink; 4, brown.
Figure 3. Smac-mimics reduced cysts in BicCΔ/YC33 flies. (A). Representative Malpighian tubules micro-dissected from BicCΔ/YC33 flies treated with either vehicle or analogs 1, 2, 3, and 4 (indicated) were photographed ex vivo. Arrows indicate cysts. In each image, anterior pairs are at the top, posterior pairs at the bottom. Scale bar: 1 mm. (B). Nested plots depicting number of cysts found in the anterior and posterior tubule pairs of vehicle- and Smac mimic-treated cystic flies (indicated), with mean and standard deviation. P values (with Welch’s correction) are indicated. Treatments are indicated with color: vehicle, grey; mimic 1, sepia; 2, blue; 3, dark pink; 4, brown.
Biomedicines 07 00082 g003
Biomedicines 07 00082 g004 550
Figure 4. Smac-mimics reduced cysts in BicCΔ/IIF34 flies. (A). Representative Malpighian tubules micro-dissected from BicCΔ/IIF34 flies treated with either vehicle or analogs 1, 2, 3, and 4 (indicated) were photographed ex vivo. Arrows indicate cysts. In each image, anterior pairs are at the top, posterior pairs at the bottom. Scale bar: 1 mm. (B). Nested plots depicting number of cysts found in the anterior and posterior tubule pairs of vehicle- and Smac mimic-treated cystic flies (indicated), with mean and standard deviation. P values (with Welch’s correction) are indicated. Treatments are indicated with color: vehicle, grey; mimic 1, sepia; 2, blue; 3, dark pink; 4, brown.
Figure 4. Smac-mimics reduced cysts in BicCΔ/IIF34 flies. (A). Representative Malpighian tubules micro-dissected from BicCΔ/IIF34 flies treated with either vehicle or analogs 1, 2, 3, and 4 (indicated) were photographed ex vivo. Arrows indicate cysts. In each image, anterior pairs are at the top, posterior pairs at the bottom. Scale bar: 1 mm. (B). Nested plots depicting number of cysts found in the anterior and posterior tubule pairs of vehicle- and Smac mimic-treated cystic flies (indicated), with mean and standard deviation. P values (with Welch’s correction) are indicated. Treatments are indicated with color: vehicle, grey; mimic 1, sepia; 2, blue; 3, dark pink; 4, brown.
Biomedicines 07 00082 g004
Biomedicines 07 00082 g005 550
Figure 5. Smac-mimics reduce cysts in BicCΔ/YC33 flies with varying regional specificity. Malpighian tubules from 50 BicCΔ/YC33 flies were micro-dissected after 20 days of treatment (age 27–29 days). Cysts were scored ex vivo. For each fly, cysts numbers were recorded for the terminal, intermediate and proximal region of the Malpighian tubules, independently for the anterior (left) and posterior (right) tubules. Flies were administered either vehicle (water, grey) or Smac mimics 1 (A, sepia), 2 (B, blue), 3 (C, dark pink), and 4 (D, brown). Mean and standard deviation are indicated. Analogs 1 and 2 best reduced tubular cysts, mimic 3 was effective at reducing cysts in the terminal region of the anterior tubules and mimic 4 had a mild effect in the intermediate region of both tubule pairs. P values (with Welch’s correction) are indicated. BicCΔ/YC33 flies exhibit the milder cystic defects.
Figure 5. Smac-mimics reduce cysts in BicCΔ/YC33 flies with varying regional specificity. Malpighian tubules from 50 BicCΔ/YC33 flies were micro-dissected after 20 days of treatment (age 27–29 days). Cysts were scored ex vivo. For each fly, cysts numbers were recorded for the terminal, intermediate and proximal region of the Malpighian tubules, independently for the anterior (left) and posterior (right) tubules. Flies were administered either vehicle (water, grey) or Smac mimics 1 (A, sepia), 2 (B, blue), 3 (C, dark pink), and 4 (D, brown). Mean and standard deviation are indicated. Analogs 1 and 2 best reduced tubular cysts, mimic 3 was effective at reducing cysts in the terminal region of the anterior tubules and mimic 4 had a mild effect in the intermediate region of both tubule pairs. P values (with Welch’s correction) are indicated. BicCΔ/YC33 flies exhibit the milder cystic defects.
Biomedicines 07 00082 g005
Biomedicines 07 00082 g006 550
Figure 6. Smac-mimics reduce cysts in BicCΔ/IIF34 flies with varying regional specificity. Malpighian tubules from 25 to 50 BicCΔ/IIF34 flies were micro-dissected after 20 d of treatment (age 27–29 days). Cysts were scored ex vivo. For each fly, cysts numbers were recorded for the terminal, intermediate and proximal region of the Malpighian tubules, independently for the anterior (left) and posterior (right) tubules. Flies were administered either vehicle (water, grey) or Smac mimics 1 (A, sepia), 2 (B, blue), 3 (C, dark pink), and 4 (D, brown). Mean and standard deviation are indicated. Peptide 1 was the most effective at reducing cysts in the treated tubules. Mimics 2 and 4 showed great improvements in all regions except for the intermediate region of the posterior tubules and mimic 3 showed a very mild to no effect in cyst reduction. P values (with Welch’s correction) are indicated. BicCΔ/IIF34 flies exhibit the more severe cystic defects.
Figure 6. Smac-mimics reduce cysts in BicCΔ/IIF34 flies with varying regional specificity. Malpighian tubules from 25 to 50 BicCΔ/IIF34 flies were micro-dissected after 20 d of treatment (age 27–29 days). Cysts were scored ex vivo. For each fly, cysts numbers were recorded for the terminal, intermediate and proximal region of the Malpighian tubules, independently for the anterior (left) and posterior (right) tubules. Flies were administered either vehicle (water, grey) or Smac mimics 1 (A, sepia), 2 (B, blue), 3 (C, dark pink), and 4 (D, brown). Mean and standard deviation are indicated. Peptide 1 was the most effective at reducing cysts in the treated tubules. Mimics 2 and 4 showed great improvements in all regions except for the intermediate region of the posterior tubules and mimic 3 showed a very mild to no effect in cyst reduction. P values (with Welch’s correction) are indicated. BicCΔ/IIF34 flies exhibit the more severe cystic defects.
Biomedicines 07 00082 g006
Table
Table 1. Overall cyst reduction upon Smac-mimic treatment of BicCΔ/YC33 flies.
Table 1. Overall cyst reduction upon Smac-mimic treatment of BicCΔ/YC33 flies.
Anterior TubulePosterior Tubule
MimicCyst #
Vehicle		Cyst #
Treated		% Reductionp ValueCyst #
Vehicle		Cyst #
Treated		% Reductionp Value
122812744%0.000527622020%0.0457
221616524%0.032424416234%0.0017
319515321%0.102823815634%0.0014
41349331%0.055315212418%0.1877
P values > 0.05 and corresponding percentages are italicized.
Table
Table 2. Overall cyst reduction upon Smac-mimic treatment of BicCΔ/IIF34 flies.
Table 2. Overall cyst reduction upon Smac-mimic treatment of BicCΔ/IIF34 flies.
Anterior TubulePosterior Tubule
MimicCyst #
Vehicle		Cyst #
Treated		% Reductionp ValueCyst #
Vehicle		Cyst #
Treated		% Reductionp Value
135719944%<0.000143327237%0.0002
223314239%0.001130220233%0.0020
311410211%0.631715512221%0.2285
419911940%0.000524315138%0.0002
P values > 0.05 and corresponding percentages are italicized.
Table
Table 3. Percentage of cyst reduction upon treatment of BicCΔ/YC33 flies.
Table 3. Percentage of cyst reduction upon treatment of BicCΔ/YC33 flies.
Smac-MimicAnterior TubulePosterior Tubule
Prox.Int.Term.Prox.Int.Term.
1 (n = 50)n/s34%
p = 0.0381		53%
p < 0.0001		5%
p = 0.7531		26%
p = 0.0449		22%
p = 0.1405
2 (n = 50)n/s5%
p = 0.7599		41%
p = 0.0006		47%
p = 0.0057		29%
p = 0.0389		32%
p = 0.0125
3 (n = 50)n/a2%
p = 0.9072		40%
p = 0.0041		21%
p = 0.2431		30%
p = 0.0465		45%
p = 0.0007
4 (n = 50)n/a36%
p = 0.0461		20%
p = 0.3377		n/s
p = 0.4769		33%
p = 0.0130		n/s
p = 0.9245
P values > 0.05 and corresponding percentages are italicized; n/s = not significant; n/a = no cysts.
Table
Table 4. Percentage of cyst reduction upon treatment of BicCΔ/IIF34 flies.
Table 4. Percentage of cyst reduction upon treatment of BicCΔ/IIF34 flies.
Smac-MimicAnterior TubulePosterior Tubule
Prox.Int.Term.Prox.Int.Term.
1 (n = 50)n/s48%
p < 0.0001		40%
p = 0.0038		39%
p = 0.0150		41%
p = 0.0008		32%
p = 0.0022
2 (n = 50)n/a41%
p = 0.0045		37%
p = 0.0161		43%
p = 0.0080		27%
p = 0.0703		32%
p = 0.0086
3 (n = 25)n/a9%
p = 0.7140		11%
p = 0.6746		40%
p = 0.1325		10%
p = 0.7038		21%
p = 0.2429
4 (n = 50)n/s42%
p = 0.0014		38%
p = 0.0195		35%
p = 0.1069		22%
p = 0.1231		51%
p < 0.0001
P values > 0.05 and corresponding percentages are italicized; n/s = not significant; n/a = no cysts.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Millet-Boureima, C.; Chingle, R.; Lubell, W.D.; Gamberi, C. Cyst Reduction in a Polycystic Kidney Disease Drosophila Model Using Smac Mimics. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040082

AMA Style

Millet-Boureima C, Chingle R, Lubell WD, Gamberi C. Cyst Reduction in a Polycystic Kidney Disease Drosophila Model Using Smac Mimics. Biomedicines. 2019; 7(4):82. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040082

Chicago/Turabian Style

Millet-Boureima, Cassandra, Ramesh Chingle, William D. Lubell, and Chiara Gamberi. 2019. "Cyst Reduction in a Polycystic Kidney Disease Drosophila Model Using Smac Mimics" Biomedicines 7, no. 4: 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040082

APA Style

Millet-Boureima, C., Chingle, R., Lubell, W. D., & Gamberi, C. (2019). Cyst Reduction in a Polycystic Kidney Disease Drosophila Model Using Smac Mimics. Biomedicines, 7(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines7040082

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop