Next Article in Journal
A Retrospective Analysis of Correlations Between Shoulder Impairment and Ultrasound Lymphedema Evaluation in Breast Cancer Patients: Preliminary Results
Previous Article in Journal
Albumin-Bound Fatty Acids Modulate Endogenous Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibition
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of COVID-19 on Renal Function: Analysis of Acute Kidney Injury Across Three Pandemic Waves
error_outline You can access the new MDPI.com website here. Explore and share your feedback with us.
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 14
Issue 1
10.3390/biomedicines14010105
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Targeting Yeast Pathogens with Lectins: A Narrative Review from Mechanistic Insights to the Need for Addressing Translational Challenges

by
Gustavo Ramos Salles Ferreira
,
Thiago Lucas da Silva Lira
and
Thiago Henrique Napoleão
*
Departamento de Bioquímica, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife 50670-901, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2026, 14(1), 105; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010105
Submission received: 2 December 2025 / Revised: 30 December 2025 / Accepted: 31 December 2025 / Published: 5 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms, Implications, and Therapeutic Targets in Infectious Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Diseases associated with yeast pathogens have become an increasingly serious global health issue. The range of virulence factors and the development of mechanisms of resistance have posed a significant challenge in the fight against these types of infections. Lectins, proteins capable of reversibly binding to carbohydrates and glycoconjugates, have been assessed as antifungal agents. This review shows that lectins have demonstrated versatility and significant potential as therapeutic agents against Candida, Nakaseomyces and Cryptococcus. These molecules act through diverse mechanisms, including disruption of fungal cell membranes, induction of oxidative stress, inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis, and interference with mitochondrial and lysosomal functions. Some lectins have been shown to inhibit yeast-to-hyphae morphological transitions and biofilm formation, which are critical virulence factors for pathogenic yeasts. Moreover, some lectins have shown potential to enhance the efficacy of conventional antifungal drugs through synergistic interactions, though these effects can depend on the fungal isolate. Beyond in vitro activity, translational considerations remain underdeveloped in the context of antifungal applications of lectins. Some lectins exhibit minimal toxicity, while others require careful dosing due to potential toxicity or undesired immunogenicity. Delivery and stability also present challenges, though strategies such as chemical modifications and topical, mucosal, or nanoparticle-based formulations show promise. Overall, the multifaceted antifungal activities of lectins highlight their promising role as innovative candidates in the development of novel therapies to address the growing challenge of yeast pathogen resistance. However, significant knowledge gaps persist, highlighting the urgent need for coordinated research that bridges in vitro findings with practical pharmacological applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Fungal infections are an increasingly serious global health threat, affecting an estimated 150 million people annually and causing approximately 1.7 million deaths [1]. Delayed diagnosis and late initiation of appropriate treatment are key factors contributing to the high morbidity and mortality associated with invasive fungal infections [2]. These challenges, combined with the long-term and widespread use of antifungal medications—particularly among high-risk groups such as the elderly, pregnant women, children, and immunocompromised individuals—have contributed to the emergence of multidrug-resistant strains [1,3].
Fungal infections are presently managed using four primary categories of antifungal medications: azoles, echinocandins, polyenes, and pyrimidine analogs. However, resistance mechanisms to these antifungals are diverse. They include overexpression of target proteins (azoles); mutations in target proteins (azoles and echinocandins); increased production and/or membrane insertion of efflux pumps (azoles); and limited access to drug targets, such as ergosterol sequestration (polyenes) [4]. In addition, fungal virulence factors (secretion of hydrolytic enzymes and biofilm formation) play a crucial role in both the progression of infection and fungal tolerance to conventional antifungal agents [2,5,6,7]. As a result, there is a growing interest in antifungal agents derived from natural sources, such as lectins.
Lectins are proteins widely distributed in nature and are found in microorganisms, plants, and animals. They possess at least one non-catalytic site that allows reversible binding to mono-, oligo-, or polysaccharides (Figure 1). The carbohydrate-binding properties of lectins enable interactions with cells and play important roles in cellular processes. Due to these properties, lectins exhibit a wide range of biological activities, including immunomodulatory [8], antiviral [9], insecticidal [10], anticancer [11], and anti-inflammatory [12] effects, among others.
The antimicrobial activity of lectins occurs through interactions with components of microbial surface, including peptidoglycans, lipopolysaccharides, teichoic and teichuronic acids, glucans, mannans, and chitin. These interactions can lead to alterations in cell permeability, pore formation on the microbial surface, agglutination of microbial cells, inhibition of growth, and ultimately, cell death [13]. Lectins are also recognized as potent natural agents with antibiofilm activity by disrupting the polymerization of key components involved in biofilm formation as well as interfering with biofilm development by reducing microbial cell viability, downregulating genes related to quorum sensing, and interacting with surfactants, enzymes, and polysaccharides essential to biofilm structure [14]. Due to these mechanisms of action, lectins have attracted increasing interest as potential antifungal agents against pathogenic yeasts.
In 2020, Del Rio et al. [15] reviewed the antifungal potential of lectins against human pathogens, summarizing both their lethal and non-lethal effects as well as the mechanisms underlying these activities. Over the subsequent five years (2021–2025), a significant body of new research has deepened our understanding of the cellular and subcellular effects of lectins on yeasts. Additionally, studies have provided growing evidence of the efficacy of lectins against Cryptococcus species and have explored their synergistic interactions with conventional antifungal agents. As research on the antifungal activity of lectins against yeasts expands, there is a rising need to investigate translational aspects of this approach, including preclinical evaluations of toxicity, efficacy, and potential pharmaceutical strategies.
This narrative review was conducted by searching for scientific articles across multiple databases, including PubMed, Springer Link, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), ScienceDirect, Wiley Online Library, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Scielo. The initial search used the descriptors “lectin” and “antifungal activity” without temporal restrictions, and only studies evaluating yeast pathogens were selected. In a second step, articles addressing the toxicity of the lectins reported to be active against yeasts were identified using the terms “toxicity” or “safety” combined with the specific lectin name. To explore other translational aspects, additional research was performed using relevant terms encompassing lectin names and formulations and drug delivery strategies. In addition, reviewing the discussion sections of the selected papers led to the identification and inclusion of additional relevant articles.
Accordingly, this review provides an updated assessment of the current state of knowledge on the antifungal activity of lectins against yeast pathogens of the Candida, Nakaseomyces and Cryptococcus genera, which encompass the species for which these proteins have demonstrated activity. It also examines critical considerations for their potential application, including toxicity, immunogenicity, selectivity, and delivery strategies, highlighting the urgent need for studies addressing translational challenges.

2. Pathogenic Yeasts: Candida and Cryptococcus

The genus Candida comprises a group of ascomycete fungi with a yeast-like morphology that are widely distributed in nature. These organisms typically live saprophytically as part of the normal human microbiota; however, under certain host conditions, they can transition from a commensal to a pathogenic form, leading to opportunistic infections known as candidiasis [16]. Candidiasis may present in superficial forms—such as infections of the skin and mucous membranes—or in systemic (invasive) forms, which can affect various organs and tissues. Although systemic candidiasis is less common than superficial infections, it is associated with a high mortality rate, ranging from 35% to 80% depending on the Candida species [17].
The most prevalent pathogenic species within the Candida genus is Candida albicans, accounting for approximately 50% of infections in the United States and Europe. This is followed by C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. krusei. It is also important to highlight that Nakaseomyces glabratus was listed in the second position in the study, as it was referred to as Candida glabrata at the time [18]. Despite its lower overall prevalence, Candida auris, a highly drug-resistant species, has emerged as a major cause of hospital-acquired infections worldwide [19].
Although most infections caused by Candida species can be treated with antifungal agents such as azoles, polyenes, echinocandins, and 5-fluorocytosine, several resistance mechanisms to these drugs have been identified. These include mutations in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway, overexpression of efflux pumps, mutations affecting cell wall biosynthesis, and alterations in nucleic acid synthesis or repair genes [20]. Additionally, the ability of Candida species to form biofilms further contributes to antifungal resistance. Biofilms provide both physical and molecular protection, reducing drug penetration and efficacy, while also promoting the dissemination of the pathogen to other regions of the host, thus posing an even greater health risk [18,21].
The cell wall of Candida albicans is a two-layered structure. The inner layer is composed of a β-glucan and chitin skeleton. β-1,3-glucans are the most abundant molecules in the inner layer and are linked to β-1,6-glucans, which function as connectors between the inner and outer layers. The outer layer is rich in mannoproteins cross-linked to β-1,6-glucans [22].
Cryptococcus is a genus of basidiomycete fungi with a yeast-like morphology and predominantly aerobic metabolism. These fungi inhabit a wide variety of environments and are characterized phenotypically by the presence of a polysaccharide capsule surrounding their cells [23,24,25]. Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii are the primary species of clinical concern, as they are opportunistic pathogens capable of causing cryptococcosis, an invasive infectious disease that primarily affects immunocompromised patients and targets the central nervous system. This fungal meningoencephalitis is associated with a high mortality rate worldwide, in both developed and developing countries [23,26].
The main virulence factors of Cryptococcus include the exopolysaccharide capsule, which not only protects the fungal cell from the host immune system but also contributes to its virulence compounds. Other factors are melanin production (a dark pigment that confers resistance to multiple stressors such as elevated temperatures, free radicals, and ionizing radiation) as well as biofilm formation [24,27].
Treatment for cryptococcosis varies according to infection severity and the host’s immune status. Cryptococcus species are generally susceptible to three classes of antifungal agents: azoles, fluorocytosine, and polyenes [23,28]. However, resistant strains to fluorocytosine [29], fluconazole [30], and amphotericin B [28] have been reported.
The cell wall of C. neoformans is a dynamic two-layered structure that undergoes constant remodeling. The inner layer is composed of β-glucans and chitin arranged as fibers parallel to the plasma membrane, while the outer layer contains α-1,3-glucan and β-glucan. β-1,6-Glucan is the most abundant component of the cell wall. Chitin is present in smaller amounts and chitosan is also part of the cell wall. Additionally, the wall contains mannoproteins. The exopolysaccharide capsule (composed of glucuronoxylomannan, galactoxylomannan and mannoproteins) is anchored to the outer layer of the cell wall, and this attachment is crucial for its function [22,25].
In this scenario, natural products may offer novel mechanisms of action capable of overcoming resistance, thereby improving the effectiveness of treatments against infections caused by Candida and Cryptococcus species. Because yeast cell walls and membranes are rich in carbohydrate components, lectins have been investigated as potential antifungal agents against these pathogens.

3. Antifungal Activity of Lectins on Candida Species

Lectins have demonstrated significant activity against clinically relevant Candida strains. Table 1 summarizes examples of lectins with antifungal activity against Candida spp. and N. glabratus, detailing their carbohydrate-binding specificity, experimental protocols, minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC), minimal fungicidal concentrations (MFC), and observed effects. The studies report that they exhibit inhibitory and/or fungicidal effects by compromising fungal cell wall and membrane integrity, inducing oxidative stress, disrupting mitochondrial function, depleting ATP, promoting apoptosis, and causing DNA damage; additionally, lectins can interfere with ergosterol biosynthesis and lysosomal stability as well as inhibiting the yeast-to-hyphae transition [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52]. For most of the mechanisms described below, the findings are based on correlative evidence, including measurements of reactive oxygen species (ROS) or ATP levels, mitochondrial membrane potential, apoptosis markers, DNA fragmentation or TUNEL assays, microscopy observations, LC/MS proteomics, and gene expression analyses. Direct evidence, by contrast, is limited to studies demonstrating carbohydrate-dependent interactions, such as inhibition by specific sugars or lectin binding detected using fluorescently labeled conjugates.
The following paragraphs explore the antifungal mechanisms of selected lectins, whose modes of action have been studied in greater depth. In this context, Figure 2 illustrates the mechanisms of some of these anti-Candida lectins (DvL, MaL, ASA, and MvFL), highlighting the diverse antifungal mechanisms.
The lectin extracted from the Dioclea violacea Mart. ex Benth. seeds (DvL) has demonstrated activity against C. albicans, C. krusei, and C. parapsilosis [38]. The authors reported that DvL caused cell wall damage forming pores ranging from 1.3 to 2.3 µm, depending on the yeast species, induced overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and inhibited ergosterol biosynthesis (Figure 2). DvL also induced apoptosis, as indicated by cytochrome c release from the mitochondrial membrane.
A gel-free proteomic analysis by liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS) analysis was used to investigate the action of DvL on C. albicans and C. krusei cells in greater depth. For C. albicans, the findings indicate that DvL modulates the expression of proteins associated with cell wall synthesis, oxidative stress response, carbohydrate metabolism, DNA repair, RNA regulation and processing, intracellular protein transport, and the cell cycle [39]. Regarding C. krusei, treatment with DvL led to upregulation of proteins associated with cell-wall remodeling and antioxidant responses, while proteins involved in the synthesis of cell-wall precursors, ergosterol metabolism, and detoxification processes were downregulated. Additionally, some proteins were detected exclusively in DvL-treated cells, indicating a metabolic shift toward the glyoxylate cycle, induction of multidrug-efflux proteins, and activation of multiple DNA-repair pathways. [40]. Together, these results demonstrate that DvL exhibits multifaceted antifungal activity against clinically relevant Candida species by targeting multiple cellular pathways, which may reduce the likelihood of resistance development. Thus, DvL is as a promising candidate for the development of novel antifungal strategies.
The concanavalins A (ConA) and M (ConM), isolated from Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC. and Canavalia rosea (Sw.) DC. seeds, respectively, inhibited the growth of C. albicans and C. tropicalis as well as were effective in inhibiting yeast-to-hyphae morphological transition in both species [37]. Although the IC50 values were high (Table 1), the dual activity of ConA and ConM–targeting both fungal proliferation and a key virulence mechanism–could be valuable in reducing pathogenicity, limiting tissue invasion, and potentially overcoming challenges posed by drug-resistant Candida strains.
Q-Griffithsin (Q-GRFT), a recombinant and oxidation-resistant variant of Griffithsin (a lectin derived from marine red algae), exhibited anti-Candida activity by binding to α-mannan in C. albicans, disrupting cell wall integrity, and inducing ROS formation, which led to cell death. Moreover, Q-GRFT inhibited the growth of N. glabratus, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, and C. auris. It also induced differential expression of numerous genes involved in stress response, ROS neutralization, and cell cycle regulation [50,53].
DvL, ConA, ConM, and GRFT are glucose/mannose-binding lectins. These lectins likely interact with Candida because its outer cell wall is rich in exposed mannoproteins and underlying glucose-based β-glucans, providing abundant carbohydrate targets. By binding to and cross-linking these sugars, they can disrupt cell wall organization and impair essential fungal functions. Additionally, GRFT can bind to N-acetyl-glucosamine (the monomer of chitin) and α-mannan (a polysaccharide composed of mannose units), further expanding its capacity to target fungal cell walls.
Other lectins able to bind mannose have demonstrated antifungal activity on Candida species. The Helianthus annuus L. jacalin (Helja) binds to C. albicans cell wall mannans, inhibiting growth, reducing viability, inducing morphological changes, and causing cell agglutination [42]. The Allium sativum L. agglutinin (ASA) showed fungistatic action and reduced viability of C. auris and N. glabratus cells, with detection of cellular alterations, including induction of hydrogen peroxide production, cell clumping, shrinkage, loss of cellular integrity and bulge formation (Figure 2) [32]. The lectin from Machaerium acutifolium Vogel seeds (MaL) showed inhibitory and fungicidal effects against C. parapsilosis and was found to increase cell membrane permeability, disrupt the activity of plasma membrane proton-pumping ATPase, trigger oxidative stress, and induce DNA damage (Figure 2) [43]. In addition to mannose, MaL binds to N-acetyl-glucosamine. The Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench leaf lectin (AEL) exhibited both fungistatic and fungicidal activity against C. parapsilosis, and the use of AEL–FITC conjugates demonstrated strong binding of AEL to C. parapsilosis blastoconidia, while only weak binding was observed with C. tropicalis and C. albicans [31], indicating a species-specific antifungal activity.
Bazán et al. [54] investigated the infectivity of C. albicans isolates in Tenebrio molitor L. larvae and the protective effects of lectins ConBr and MaL. When lectins were administered before infection, both significantly increased larval survival. After infection, only MaL provided a notable survival benefit, showing that this lectin can act prophylactically and therapeutically.
Some antifungal lectins display chitin-binding properties. The lectin extracted from the juicy sarcotesta of Punica granatum L. (PgTeL) exhibited antifungal activity against C. albicans and C. krusei by compromising cell viability even at sub-inhibitory concentrations. PgTeL treatment induced oxidative stress, decreased ATP levels, and caused structural damage to the yeast cell wall [49]. The water-soluble lectin extracted from Moringa oleifera Lam. seeds (WSMoL) demonstrated inhibitory and fungicidal effects on C. albicans, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, and N. glabratus. Exposure to WSMoL led to an increased proportion of yeast cells undergoing apoptosis and necrosis. Additionally, treatment with this lectin resulted in mitochondrial membrane hyperpolarization after 12 h, followed by depolarization at the 24 h mark [52]. In addition to chitin, WSMoL binds to N-acetyl glucosamine, glucose and fructose [55]. Other chitin-binding lectins, including those from Portulaca elatior Mart. ex Rohrb. leaf (PeLL) and root (PeRoL), as well as Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi. leaf (SteLL), also exhibit anti-Candida activity [47,48,51].
Mo-CBP2, another chitin-binding lectin from M. oleifera seeds, exhibited antifungal activity against C. albicans and caused pronounced cell damage. It was observed surface alterations such as pore-like depressions and collapsed cells, along with consistent leakage of cytoplasmic contents. The antifungal effect was completely abolished by mannose, sucrose, and galactose, suggesting carbohydrate-dependent interactions, and absorbance analyses showed that Mo-CBP2 also promotes aggregation of C. albicans cells [45].
Chitin-binding lectins are able to interact with a key structural component of the fungal cell wall. This interaction can disrupt cell wall integrity, inhibiting growth and hyphal formation, and can trigger stress responses leading to cell death. Additionally, lectin binding may expose fungal components that enhance recognition and clearance by the host immune system. These combined effects make chitin-binding lectins promising antifungal agents against Candida.
The lectin derived from Microgramma vacciniifolia fronds (MvFL), which binds to oligosaccharides (like those present in fetuin and ovalbumin), demonstrated fungistatic properties against C. albicans, C. krusei, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and N. glabratus. In the case of N. glabratus, MvFL markedly suppressed cell proliferation, compromised lysosomal membrane stability, and led to a reduction in mitochondrial membrane potential (Figure 2) [44]. The leaf lectin from Calliandra surinamensis Benth. (CasuL) demonstrated antifungal activity against C. krusei, with treated cells exhibiting pronounced morphological alterations, including cytoplasmic retraction, cell rupture, and accumulation of cellular debris. Furthermore, incomplete budding or division events were observed, and CasuL was found to compromise the structural integrity of the C. krusei cell wall. CasuL recognizes oligosaccharide moieties, such as those present in ovalbumin, fetuin and bovine serum albumin [35]. Lastly, the lectin obtained from the inflorescence of Alpinia purpurata (Vieill.) K.Schum. (ApuL) exhibited a fungistatic effect on C. albicans and C. parapsilosis. Treatment with ApuL led to structural alterations in the yeast cells, including malformations, elongation, and bulging [34]. ApuL is also able to interact with oligosaccharides found in glycoproteins [56].
Oligosaccharide-binding lectins can exert antifungal activity primarily by interacting with glycans present on Candida cell walls, particularly those attached to cell wall glycoproteins. These glycoproteins are essential for maintaining structural integrity, mediating adhesion, and supporting wall remodeling during cell growth and division. Lectin binding to these glycoproteins can disrupt the organization of the cell wall matrix, leading to morphological changes such as cytoplasmic retraction, bulging, and cell rupture.
In summary, the anti-Candida efficacy of lectins is tightly governed by their carbohydrate-binding specificity, with each sugar target—mannose, glucose, chitin, or complex oligosaccharides—dictating the spectrum and mechanism of activity. Lectins that recognize abundant or structurally critical cell wall components, such as mannans or chitin, tend to induce pronounced fungicidal effects through cell wall disruption and oxidative stress.

4. Antifungal Activity of Lectins on Cryptococcus Species

Despite advances in the study of natural products with antifungal activity, most research has focused on yeasts of the Candida genus, while studies involving Cryptococcus species remain scarce. This gap concerns the clinical relevance of these species, especially in immunocompromised patients. Furthermore, the therapeutic potential of natural compounds, such as lectins, against Cryptococcus is still largely underexplored. This points to the need for further research aimed at developing innovative and effective therapeutic alternatives in response to the growing resistance to conventional antifungal agents. Nevertheless, some lectins have already been investigated for their anticryptococcal activity (Table 2). Figure 3 summarizes the effects of three of these anti-Cryptococcus lectins, scytovirin, PgTeL and WSMoL.
The cyanobacterial lectin Scytovirin has demonstrated fungicidal activity against strains of C. neoformans (serotypes A and D) and C. gattii as well as affected capsule size and prevented the release of the polysaccharide capsule (Figure 3) [60]. Scytovirin specifically binds high-mannose oligosaccharides, a property that may underline its interaction with mannan polymers and mannoproteins present in both the capsule and the cell membrane of Cryptococcus species. These interactions likely contribute to the observed disruptions in capsule integrity and fungal viability.
WSMoL showed fungistatic effect against C. neoformans strains H99 and B3501, and C. gattii strain R265. This lectin promoted lysosomal damage in B3501 and R265 cells and reduced the mitochondrial membrane potential in B3501 (Figure 3) [61]. The Myracrodruon urundeuva Allem. heartwood lectin (MuHL) exhibited fungistatic and fungicidal activities against C. neoformans H99 and B3501 and C. gattii R265 [58] while PgTeL inhibited the growth of C. neoformans B3501 [59]. The anti-Cryptococcus activities observed for WSMoL, MuHL, and PgTeL can be interpreted in light of their shared classification as chitin-binding lectins and the structural and functional characteristics of the Cryptococcus cell wall. Chitin, although less abundant than glucans, is an essential component of the cryptococcal cell wall and is particularly enriched at sites of cell division and wall remodeling. The differential susceptibility among strains may reflect variations in cell wall architecture, chitin exposure, or compensatory stress response pathways.
The cMoL, a galactose-binding lectin from M. oleifera seeds, exhibited fungistatic activity against the strains H99, B3501, and R265, inducing necrosis and apoptosis in fungal cells [57]. Unlike the chitin-binding lectins discussed above, cMoL recognizes galactose-containing glycoconjugates. These are also present in cryptococcal surface structures, including cell wall polysaccharides and capsule-associated glycans like galactoxylomannan.

5. Antibiofilm Activity of Lectins on Yeasts

The antibiofilm activity of lectins against Candida species has also been investigated. Lectins such as ApuL, PgTeL, and a lectin isolated from Triticum aestivum L. seeds were shown to inhibit C. albicans biofilm formation [34,49,62], whereas ASA exhibited antibiofilm activity against C. auris and N. glabrata [32]. In contrast, MvFL displayed minimal antibiofilm activity, causing only a slight reduction in biofilm formation by C. tropicalis [44]. Mo-CBP2 inhibited biomass formation by C. albicans and C. tropicalis during the initial adhesion stage. In addition, Mo-CBP2 reduced the biomass of mature biofilms of both species by approximately 50–75%, although this effect was not dose dependent [46]. Despite these promising findings, the molecular mechanisms underlying the antibiofilm activity of lectins against Candida remain unexplored.
With respect to antibiofilm activity of lectins on Cryptococcus, PgTeL reduced biofilm biomass of C. neoformans B3501 over a wide concentration range (4–256 µg/mL) and decreased metabolic activity of biofilm-embedded cells at concentrations ≥32 µg/mL. Moreover, PgTeL (8–256 µg/mL) was also able to eradicate pre-formed biofilms of this strain [59]. These results indicate PgTeL activity not only during the initial stages of biofilm development but also against established biofilm structures (Figure 3). However, the molecular basis of these antibiofilm effects remains to be elucidated.
WSMoL (25–400 µg/mL) was also able to inhibit biofilm formation by the B3501 strain [61], reinforcing the relevance of chitin-targeting strategies in interfering with cryptococcal biofilms. On the other hand, cMoL did not demonstrate antibiofilm activity [57], suggesting that galactosylated targets recognized by this lectin are either less accessible or less critical for biofilm establishment and maintenance in C. neoformans.

6. Combination Effects of Lectins with Antifungal Drugs

Evaluating the synergistic interactions between antifungal agents and lectins is essential for improving treatment outcomes, as it may enhance antifungal efficacy, reduce required drug dosages, minimize side effects, and help overcome the increasing challenge of antifungal resistance. To assess drug interactions, fractional inhibitory concentrations (FICs) and the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) are calculated. The FIC for each agent is defined as the MIC in combination divided by the MIC alone. The FICI is then obtained by summing the FICs of the antifungal drug and the lectin. Interactions are interpreted as follows: FICI ≤ 0.5, synergism; 0.5 < FICI ≤ 1, additive effect; 1 < FICI ≤ 2, no interaction (indifferent); and FICI > 2, antagonism.
Indeed, lectins have also been shown to enhance the efficacy of conventional antifungal agents through synergistic interactions against yeast species (Figure 4). Table 3 summarizes data on investigation of combinations between lectins and conventional antifungal drugs against Candida and Cryptococcus.
Helja significantly increased the antifungal activity of fluconazole against C. albicans. In addition, treated cells displayed pronounced morphological abnormalities, including nuclear disintegration and multimeric structure formation, which ultimately led to cellular collapse [41]. ApuL demonstrated synergistic antifungal activity in combination with fluconazole against C. parapsilosis [34] and ConA and ConM showed additive effect when combined with fluconazole at subinhibitory concentrations, enhancing the antifungal effectiveness against C. albicans by over 50% [37]. Such synergistic or additive interactions can be therapeutically advantageous, allowing lower doses of each agent, potentially reducing toxicity and limiting the development of drug resistance. Synergism may arise from complementary mechanisms of action, although the exact molecular basis often requires further investigation.
In the case of MvFL, combination studies revealed synergistic interaction with fluconazole when assessed against C. parapsilosis. However, antagonistic effects were observed for the combination MvFL with fluconazole against C. albicans and N. glabratus [44], highlighting the importance of species-specific responses when evaluating combination therapies.
Although the antifungal mechanisms of lectins against Cryptococcus species are still not fully understood, they showed promising potential as alternative or adjunctive therapies against these pathogenic yeasts. Scytovirin exhibited strong synergistic effects when combined with the commercial antifungal amphotericin B [60]. cMoL showed synergistic effect in combination with fluconazole against the H99 strain of C. neoformans. However, the combination proved to be antagonistic for C. neoformans B3501 and C. gattii R265 [57]. Such antagonistic interactions can be detrimental in clinical settings, potentially reducing therapeutic efficacy and promoting persistence or resistance. The occurrence of antagonism emphasizes the necessity of carefully evaluating the species- and strain-specific responses before proposing combination therapies.

7. Translational Challenges

As shown above, research on the antifungal activity of lectins against pathogenic yeasts has advanced in recent years, particularly in efforts to elucidate the mode of action of these proteins in different isolates or species. However, in addition to these scientific challenges, several translational bottlenecks must also be addressed, including toxicity, immunogenicity, stability, and delivery strategies (Figure 5). In the following sections, information regarding these aspects for antifungal lectins is compiled, or the absence of important translational considerations is highlighted.

7.1. Assessment of Lectin Toxicity

In vitro cytotoxicity studies are crucial for assessing the safety of lectins in biomedical applications, providing a controlled setting to detect potential toxic effects and establish safe concentration ranges. These studies commonly employ non-target cells, including hepatic, renal, cardiac, endothelial, fibroblast, erythrocytes, and immune cells, to evaluate general cytotoxicity before progressing to in vivo experiments. Some antifungal lectins listed in Table 1 and Table 2 have been investigated in this context. CasuL, for instance, did not reduce the viability of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells at concentrations below 100 μg/mL and, across 3.12–100 μg/mL, failed to induce apoptosis or necrosis in mouse splenocytes [35,63]. Similarly, SteLL was non-toxic to splenocytes and did not affect cytosolic Ca2+ levels or reactive oxygen species production [64], while MaL did not cause reduction in RAW 264.7 macrophage viability at 31.25 μg/mL [65].
Hemolytic activity does not appear be a limitation for lectins such as PeLL, which caused a maximum of 14.3% hemolysis in human erythrocytes at 300 μg/mL [47], and PgTeL, which exhibited no cytotoxicity to murine splenocytes within 1.56–50 μg/mL and no hemolysis up to 1000 μg/mL [66]. In contrast, DvL demonstrated measurable cytotoxicity toward Vero (monkey kidney) and HaCaT (human fibroblast) cells, with IC50 values of 71.6 and 80.2 μg/mL, corresponding to 2.8 and 3.1 µM, respectively [67]. Notably, ASL50 showed no cytotoxic effects on HEK 293 (embryonic kidney) cells or human erythrocytes [33].
Together, these studies illustrate the diverse safety profiles of antifungal lectins and highlight the importance of systematic cytotoxicity screening. Establishing non-toxic concentration ranges in vitro not only informs safer application strategies but also lays the groundwork for preclinical in vivo studies, which have already been conducted for some of the antifungal lectins reviewed in this paper.
PgTeL, for example, was evaluated for acute toxicity in Swiss mice. At a dose of 100 mg/kg (i.p.), no differences were observed in food or water intake, nor in body weight variation, and the compound did not induce any behavioral signs of toxicity. Treated animals also exhibited no alterations in their coagulogram (activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, and thrombin time), hematological parameters, or blood biochemical parameters, except for reductions in triglyceride, LDL, and VLDL levels. Additionally, the relative organ weights remained unchanged. PgTeL was also non-genotoxic in vivo at the same dose of 100 mg/kg (i.p.) [66].
A single dose of SteLL (100 mg/kg), administered orally or intraperitoneally in Swiss mice, caused no mortality or signs of toxicity over a 14-day period. Water and food intake, body weight, hematological and biochemical parameters, and organ weights were not significantly affected, except for a slight increase in food intake following intraperitoneal administration. Histopathological analysis revealed normal architecture of the liver, kidney, spleen, and stomach [68].
The in vivo acute toxicity of PeLL was also assessed in Swiss mice following oral administration at doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg. Over the 14-day observation period, no significant changes were observed in body weight, water intake, or food consumption compared to the control group. Hematological parameters remained within normal ranges, and most biochemical markers were unaffected, although mice treated with 10 mg/kg PeLL exhibited a slight decrease in serum albumin levels [47].
Acute toxicity of cMoL was assessed in Swiss mice following a single dose of 200 mg/kg administered orally or intraperitoneally. Genotoxic potential was evaluated using the comet assay and micronucleus test. At this dose, cMoL did not cause mortality or observable toxic effects, and no alterations were detected in hematological, biochemical, histopathological, or genotoxic parameters [57].
GRFT exhibited minimal toxicity in rodents following single or repeated subcutaneous doses. In BALB/c mice, a single 50 mg/kg dose or 14 daily doses of 10 mg/kg were well tolerated, with no significant changes in general health, blood chemistry, or complete blood counts. In Hartley guinea pigs, mild and reversible increases in liver and spleen mass were observed, but no histopathological alterations occurred. Across subcutaneous, intravaginal, and intraperitoneal administrations relevant to microbicide development, GRFT demonstrated a safety profile, with reversible splenomegaly and activation of certain spleen B and T cells, but no adverse effects on other organs [69,70].
These results show that the lectins PgTeL, SteLL, PeLL, cMoL, and GRFT were generally safe in rodent studies, causing no significant toxic effects. Some changes observed were mild and reversible, supporting further studies on their translational relevance for future preclinical research as antifungal drug candidates. However, additional administration routes, such as dermal, intradermal, intranasal, and mucosal, should be evaluated, and studies with other doses and longer observation periods are needed to better define their safety profile.
In contrast, some of the other lectins mentioned in the review have been reported as toxic in rodents depending on the dose. WSMoL exhibited a lower safe profile in mice compared to cMoL since its intraperitoneal administration at doses of 100 mg/kg or higher proved hazardous. Animals receiving WSMoL at 200 mg/kg i.p. exhibited depressive behaviors, lethargy, constipation, and abdominal spasms within the first hour after administration. At this dose, mortality reached 40% after three days. Conversely, when the dose was reduced to 100 mg/kg i.p., no deaths were observed; however, animals displayed mild abdominal contractions, decreased mobility, tail erythema, lethargy, prostration, and constipation [71]. ConA also requires careful handling, as it effectively induces liver inflammation, with toxicity varying according to the dose. Intravenous administration triggers liver injury by activating and recruiting T cells. This effect could begin at 15 mg/kg i.v., depending on the mouse strain [72]. In the case of DVL, animals were injected subcutaneously into the left hind footpad with 50 µg of lectin and developed lymph nodes exhibiting apoptotic foci and focal inflammatory reactions, characterized by abundant macrophages and neutrophils, as well as hemorrhage [73]. These findings emphasize the importance of guiding safe dosing in future preclinical studies.
MvFL (10 and 20 mg/kg, i.p.) reduced sarcoma 180 tumor growth in mice by inducing necrosis and leukocyte infiltration, as well as by interfering with angiogenesis [74]. The authors also evaluated the animals for toxicity and observed no changes in water or food consumption, body weight, hematological or biochemical parameters, and no signs of toxicity in the liver, kidneys, or spleen.
Other lectins have been evaluated pharmacologically in vivo, although systematic evaluations of their acute, subacute, or chronic toxicity were not the focus. For instance, AEL exhibited anti-inflammatory effects in a paw edema model in Wistar rats when administered intravenously at doses of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 mg/kg [75]. The topical application of BVL (200 μg/mL) on dorsal skin wounds in Swiss albino mice promoted healing, indicating a potential role in tissue repair [76]. ConBr has shown neuroprotective activity against quinolinic acid-induced seizures following intracerebroventricular administration at 10 μg per site [77]. Additionally, ConBr (1–10 μg/site, i.c.v.) reduced immobility time in the forced swim test without altering locomotor activity in the open-field test, suggesting potential antidepressant-like effects [78]. In a model of acute pancreatitis, intravenous administration of ConBr (0.1, 1, or 10 mg/kg) at 1 and 12 h post-induction mitigated pancreatic damage, including neutrophil infiltration, edema, and necrosis [79]. Although these studies demonstrate the therapeutic potential of lectins, comprehensive toxicity data are still lacking. Detailed acute, subacute, and chronic toxicity evaluations are essential to fully assess their safety and support the translational development of lectins for clinical applications, including their antifungal properties highlighted in this review.

7.2. Immunogenicity and Immunomodulatory Effects of Lectins

The assessment of protein immunogenicity is particularly critical for pharmaceutical applications, such as oral or mucosal delivery, since immune recognition of a lectin could interfere with its therapeutic efficacy. Due to their proteinaceous nature, lectins can be immunogenic because their amino acid sequences, three-dimensional structures, or unique post-translational modifications may be recognized as foreign by the animal immune system. This recognition can stimulate the production of antibodies or activate immune cells, potentially leading to allergies or inflammatory responses.
However, evaluating lectins is especially complex because some of these proteins are immunomodulatory and can enhance immune responses for a desirable purpose. As examples of antifungal lectins with immunomodulatory activity, CasuL exhibited effects on mice splenocytes: treatment stimulated splenocyte proliferation, increased cytosolic ROS levels, did not affect cytosolic calcium concentration, mitochondrial ROS, or ΔΨm levels, and promoted the release of IL-2 and TNF-α [63]. SteLL induced splenocytes to release pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-17A, TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-2) as well as IL-4, an anti-inflammatory cytokine that can prevent excessive inflammation [64]. MvFL enhanced lysosomal activity in murine macrophages, which may have contributed to its leishmanicidal effect, although it did not alter the phagocytic capacity of macrophages [80]. MvFL (5 and 10 mg/kg, i.p.) also exhibited in vivo anti-inflammatory activity in peritonitis and paw edema models by modulating leukocyte infiltration and cytokine release [81].
DVL exerts a proliferative effect on RAW 267.4 macrophages [82]. However, its immunological effects should be considered with caution. As noted in the previous subsection, DVL administration stimulated the lymph nodes of BALB/c mice in a manner that induced apoptosis of leukocytes in the parafollicular, interfollicular, and subcapsular regions, with few affected cells in the medullary areas. This previously reported pro-inflammatory effect of DVL is concerning, as it led to hemorrhagic lymph nodes accompanied by fibrinoid necrosis [73]. It was also mentioned above that ConA and GRFT can modulate the immune response in rodents, which, as observed, can be either positive or negative depending on the context and dose.
Studies in animal models have demonstrated the immunogenicity of lectins, particularly their ability to induce antibody production. For example, mistletoe (Viscum album L.) lectin 1 induces strong systemic IgG and IgA responses, as well as mucosal IgA, whereas lectins such as PHA (Phaseolus vulgaris L. agglutinin), WGA (T. aestivum agglutinin), and UEA-1 (Ulex europaeus L. agglutinin) generate relatively weak antibody responses with minimal mucosal involvement. These differences evidence the importance of evaluating each lectin individually rather than assuming uniform effects [83,84,85].
Regarding the antifungal lectins discussed in this review, the immunogenic potential of garlic lectins (ASA) following oral administration in BALB/c mice was evaluated, revealing a lectin-specific serum IgG response. The immunogenicity of ASA was associated with its moderate stability in simulated gastric fluid [86]. Furthermore, intradermal and intranasal administration of ASA I and ASA II in BALB/c mice led to marked increases in anti-lectin IgG levels, without affecting body weight, while also inducing enlargement of the spleen and thymus. Notably, intranasal co-administration of ASA I with ovalbumin (OVA) significantly enhanced anti-OVA IgG responses, highlighting its strong capacity to elicit mucosal immunity [87].
To minimize immunogenicity and undesired immunomodulatory effects of lectins, a combination of strategies can be employed: protein engineering (e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, PEGylation, or glycoengineering) can mask immunogenic epitopes; controlled and targeted delivery using nanoparticles, liposomes, or mucosal carriers can limit systemic immune exposure; careful dosing regimens, including gradual escalation or co-administration with tolerogenic agents, can reduce antibody responses; selection of naturally low-immunogenic lectins and avoidance of strongly pro-inflammatory ones helps prevent adverse effects.

7.3. Formulation and Delivery of Lectins

In continuity, it is evident that, despite their promising therapeutic potential, the clinical application of antifungal lectins still faces fundamental challenges related to their safe and effective use as drugs. In this context, protective strategies and drug delivery systems can help mitigate undesired toxicity and immunogenicity, while also enhancing bioavailability and enabling targeted delivery. The treatment of yeast infections depends on their severity: superficial infections, such as mild cutaneous or vaginal candidiasis, are usually treated with topical antifungals, while severe, recurrent, or systemic cases may require oral therapy.
Delivering lectins orally remains difficult, similar to what is observed with other proteins, because of their physicochemical characteristic as well as numerous physiological barriers throughout the gastrointestinal tract. These macromolecules are exposed first to the highly acidic gastric environment, where proteolytic enzymes like pepsin and cathepsin can rapidly degrade them. Fluctuations in stomach pH can further destabilize their conformation and impair their function. Degradation continues in the small intestine via trypsin, α-chymotrypsin, and other enzymes, leading to extremely low bioavailability, often below 1% [88,89]. To address these challenges, a variety of strategies have been explored to enhance the stability, permeability, and overall performance of orally delivered protein therapeutics.
One strategy involves chemically modifying lectins. Lipidation increases lipophilicity, improving half-life, reducing immunogenicity, and enabling intracellular and epithelial delivery, though it may affect structure or receptor binding [89,90,91]. PEGylation shields antigenic sites, reduces degradation, and enhances stability and pharmacokinetics, but can increase size, reduce cellular affinity, and raise biocompatibility concerns [88,92]. Other modifications, like esterification and cationization, improve lipophilicity or membrane interaction, respectively, but may increase plasma protein binding, immunogenicity, or clearance [88,89].
Reducing enzymatic breakdown is another strategy. Protease inhibitors protect protein drugs from enzymatic degradation but may cause toxicity or disrupt pancreatic function, while mucolytics enhance epithelial drug access by reducing mucus viscosity, though excessive thinning can increase acid and enzymatic vulnerability of the protein [88,89].
Various delivery systems have been developed to protect proteins and enhance their therapeutic efficacy, including microemulsions [93], self-emulsifying systems [94], liposomes [95], and polymeric nanoparticles [96]. These systems shield proteins from enzymatic degradation, enable controlled release, improve stability, and facilitate intestinal absorption. However, microparticles face challenges like limited loading, aggregation, and scale-up issues, while liposomes are constrained by stability, leakage, and short shelf life [88,89,97]. Considering the antifungal lectins reviewed here, liposomes loaded with BVL enhance cellular uptake and cytotoxicity while stabilizing protein structure [98]. DVL in controlled-release CaCO3 particles also showed efficient lectin release and higher cytotoxicity against HeLa cells compared to free lectin [99]. However, studies using lectins in delivery systems for anti-Candida and anti-Cryptococcus applications are still needed.
Since each strategy has distinct advantages and limitations, combining complementary approaches represents the most promising path toward clinically reliable protein-based oral therapies. While oral administration remains challenging, lectins with antifungal activity are likely better suited for topical delivery, where protein stability is maintained and localized action is possible. These lectins could potentially be formulated into gels, creams, ointments, or mucoadhesive films for cutaneous, oral, or vaginal candidiasis; into vaginal mucoadhesive gels for prolonged residence; into inhalable forms such as nebulized suspensions or dry powders for pulmonary Cryptococcus infections; and into parenteral formulations, including injectable solutions or lipid/polymeric nanoparticles, for systemic infections. These strategies aim to maintain stability and efficacy, though some remain theoretical and have not yet been experimentally tested.
Vaginal treatment of CBA/J mice with a 1% Q-GRFT prototype formulated in Carbopol gel resulted in a reduced C. albicans burden without altering the numbers of vaginal neutrophils or monocytes. Histopathological analysis also showed decreased vaginal colonization by C. albicans following Q-GRFT treatment [53]. Thus, Q-GRFT represents a promising broad-spectrum antifungal candidate with potential for topical application.
Alginate-based films incorporating MaL or ConBr lectins have been developed and evaluated ex vivo for mucoadhesive properties using bovine jugal mucosa. Both MaL- and ConBr-loaded films were biocompatible and structurally stable, releasing lectins at similar initial rates, though MaL reached a higher final release. MaL films exhibited smoother surfaces, whereas ConBr films showed greater mucoadhesiveness. Despite these differences, neither lectin altered core film properties such as thickness, moisture, pH, or swelling, and both formulations dissolved rapidly, demonstrating their suitability as orodispersible delivery systems [54]. However, antifungal activity against C. albicans was not assessed in the work.
In another approach, an antimicrobial material was designed for wound dressings or coatings by immobilizing Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectin B on a protein-based hydrogel, enabling the material to capture pathogens on contact. LecB mediated strong binding of laboratory and clinical P. aeruginosa strains, and the drug-loaded fibrillar compartment subsequently eliminated the captured bacteria. This integrated strategy has potential to improve management of extensive hospital wounds by preventing biofilm formation and controlling aggressive, carbapenem-resistant strains [100], and thus it could be adapted for antifungal lectins in the future.

7.4. Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions

Despite growing evidence that various lectins exhibit significant antifungal activity against pathogenic yeasts, their translational development as therapeutic agents remains largely unexplored. Most studies to date have focused on in vitro antifungal efficacy, while comprehensive investigations into pharmacological development are scarce or limited, particularly formulation, delivery strategies, stability, bioavailability, and toxicity. This represents a critical bottleneck since without optimized delivery systems, thorough pharmacokinetic characterization, and toxicity assessment, even lectins with potent anti-Candida and anti-Cryptococcus activity cannot progress reliably toward clinical applications.
While some preliminary delivery strategies, such as encapsulation in nanoparticles, liposomes, or mucoadhesive films, have shown promise in protecting lectins and enhancing efficacy, these approaches remain sporadic and underdeveloped when considering antifungal application. For most antifungal lectins, systematic studies integrating chemical modifications, controlled-release carriers, or targeted delivery strategies have not yet been conducted.
These knowledge gaps highlight the urgent need for coordinated research bridging in vitro activity with practical pharmacological applications. Developing formulations that stabilize lectins, enable controlled release, and target specific tissues or infection sites is essential to unlock their therapeutic potential. Furthermore, investigating multiple administration routes (oral, topical, mucosal, and other) alongside rigorous toxicity studies will provide crucial insights into the safety, efficacy, and optimal strategies for effective antifungal therapy.

8. Conclusions

The emergence of alternative therapies for fungal infections has become increasingly important in global health. Lectins have demonstrated versatility and significant potential as therapeutic agents against human fungal pathogens, particularly species responsible for infections with high morbidity and mortality, such as those in the genera Candida, Nakaseomyces and Cryptococcus. These molecules act through diverse mechanisms, including disruption of fungal cell membranes, induction of oxidative stress, inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis, and interference with mitochondrial and lysosomal functions. Some lectins have been shown to inhibit yeast-to-hyphae morphological transitions and biofilm formation, which are critical virulence factors for pathogenic yeasts. Moreover, lectins have shown potential to enhance the efficacy of conventional antifungal drugs through synergistic interactions, suggesting their value as adjunctive therapeutic agents.
Despite these promising findings, the current evidence is uneven: while some studies provide robust mechanistic insights, others remain preliminary, often reporting effects similar to those observed in different cell types or with other molecules. To translate lectins into viable antifungal agents, future research must address several critical gaps: limited investigation of Cryptococcus compared to Candida; detailed elucidation of molecular pathways mediating antifungal and antibiofilm activities; characterization of synergistic interactions across diverse clinical isolates; in vivo and clinical validation; and assessment of toxicity and delivery challenges. Additionally, potential antagonistic interactions between lectins and certain antifungal drugs must be considered.
At present, promising antifungal lectins remain largely experimental, restricting their contribution to the urgent need for new antifungal agents amid rising drug resistance. Therefore, advancing antifungal lectins toward clinical application requires a concerted effort in rational formulation design, innovative delivery strategies, and rigorous preclinical evaluation to ensure their safe, effective, and practical use as antifungal therapeutics.

Funding

This research was funded by Fundação de Amparo à Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado de Pernambuco (FACEPE), grant numbers IBPG-0089-2.08/25, BFP-0021-2.08/22 and APQ-2144-2.08/24 and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, grant number 305251/2023-6.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used ChatGPT (GPT-5.2) for the purpose of correcting grammatical and spelling errors. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kainz, K.; Bauer, M.A.; Madeo, F.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D. Fungal infections in humans: The silent crisis. Microb. Cell 2020, 7, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jenks, J.D.; Cornely, O.A.; Chen, S.C.A.; Thompson, G.R., III; Hoenigl, M. Breakthrough invasive fungal infections: Who is at risk? Mycoses 2020, 63, 1021–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lass-Flörl, C.; Steixner, S. The changing epidemiology of fungal infections. Mol. Asp. Med. 2023, 94, 101215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hossain, C.M.; Ryan, L.K.; Gera, M.; Choudhuri, S.; Lyle, N.; Ali, K.A.; Diamond, G. Antifungals and drug resistance. Encyclopedia 2022, 2, 1722–1737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yan, C.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Zeng, X.; Xiao, G. Virulence factors, biofilm formation and antifungal resistance in Candida albicans from recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis patients: A comparative study. Sci Rep. 2025, 15, 37557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Henriques, M.; Silva, S. Candida albicans virulence factors and its pathogenicity. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hui, S.T.; Gifford, H.; Rhodes, J. Emerging antifungal resistance in fungal pathogens. Curr. Clin. Microbiol. Rep. 2024, 11, 43–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chop, M.; Del Rio, M.; Radicioni, M.B.; Cevey, Á.C.; Hernández-Chávez, M.J.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Regente, M.; Rodriguez Rodrigues, C. Helja lectin inhibits Candida albicans phagocytosis and induces pro-inflammatory responses in dendritic cells. Phytomedicine 2025, 143, 156637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. El-Maradny, Y.A.; El-Fakharany, E.M.; Abu-Serie, M.M.; Hashish, M.H.; Selim, H.S. Lectins purified from medicinal and edible mushrooms: Insights into their antiviral activity against pathogenic viruses. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 179, 239–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lira, T.L.S.; Almeida, C.F.; Farias, L.A.S.; Santos, E.C.F.; Ferreira, M.R.A.; Soares, L.A.L.; Napoleão, T.H.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Coelho, L.C.B.B. Insecticidal activity of saline extract, protein fraction, and lectin (BmoLL) from Bauhinia monandra Kurz (Fabaceae) leaves on Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, 1855 (Coleoptera: Dryophthoridae). Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2026, 71, 103893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Arruda, M.C.S.; Silva, M.R.O.B.; Cavalcanti, V.L.R.; Brandão, R.M.P.B.; Marques, D.A.V.; Lima, L.R.A.; Porto, A.L.F.; Bezerra, R.P. Antitumor lectins from algae: A systematic review. Algal Res. 2023, 70, 102962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Batista, K.L.R.; Silva, L.S.; Silva, I.S.S.; Paiva, M.Y.M.; Santos, J.L.S.; Sousa, C.E.M.; Branco, S.J.S.C.; Paiva, F.E.A.; Roma, R.R.; Oliveira, F.S.A.; et al. Wound healing and anti-inflammatory effects of LAA, the N-acetyl-D-galactosamine-binding lectin from seeds of Luetzelburgia auriculata (Allemão) ducke. Histochem. Cell Biol. 2025, 163, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Silva, P.M.S.; Oliveira, W.F.; Moura, M.C.; Pontual, E.V.; Gomes, F.S.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Napoleão, T.H.; Correia, M.T.S. Lectins as antimicrobial agents. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2018, 125, 1238–1252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Napoleão, T.H.; Lira, T.L.S.; Pontual, E.V.; Ferreira, G.R.S.; Silva, P.M. Lectins as natural antibiofilm agents in the fight against antibiotic resistance: A review. Molecules 2025, 30, 3395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Del Río, M.; de la Canal, L.; Regente, M. Plant Antifungal Lectins: Mechanism of Action and Targets on Human Pathogenic Fungi. Curr. Prot. Pept. Sci. 2020, 21, 284–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Papon, N.; Courdavault, V.; Clastre, M.; Bennett, R.J. Emerging and emerged pathogenic Candida species: Beyond the Candida albicans paradigm. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Ahmed, N.; Mahmood, M.S.; Ullah, M.A.; Araf, Y.; Rahaman, T.I.; Moin, A.T.; Hosen, M.J. COVID-19-associated candidiasis: Possible patho-mechanism, predisposing factors, and prevention strategies. Curr. Microbiol. 2022, 79, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Malinovská, Z.; Čonková, E.; Váczi, P. Biofilm formation in medically important Candida species. J. Fungi 2023, 9, 955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Briano, F.; Magnasco, L.; Sepulcri, C.; Dettori, S.; Dentone, C.; Mikulska, M.; Ball, L.; Vena, A.; Robba, C.; Patroniti, N.; et al. Candida auris candidemia in critically ill, colonized patients: Cumulative incidence and risk factors. Infect. Dis. Ther. 2022, 11, 1149–1160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Czajka, K.M.; Venkataraman, K.; Brabant-Kirwan, D.; Santi, S.A.; Verschoor, C.; Appanna, V.D.; Singh, R.; Saunders, D.P.; Tharmalingam, S. Molecular mechanisms associated with antifungal resistance in pathogenic Candida species. Cells 2023, 12, 2655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tóth, R.; Nosek, J.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Gabaldon, T.; Bliss, J.M.; Nosanchuk, J.D.; Gácser, A. Candida parapsilosis: From genes to the bedside. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e10-1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Garcia-Rubio, R.; Oliveira, H.C.; Rivera, J.; Trevijano-Contador, N. The fungal cell wall: Candida, Cryptococcus, and Aspergillus species. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mourad, A.; Perfect, J.R. Present and future therapy of Cryptococcus infections. J. Fungi 2018, 4, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zaragoza, O. Basic principles of the virulence of Cryptococcus. Virulence 2019, 10, 490–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. De Jesus, M.; Moraes Nicola, A.; Chow, S.-K.; Lee, I.R.; Nong, S.; Specht, C.A.; Levitz, S.M.; Casadevall, A. Glucuronoxylomannan, galactoxylomannan and mannoprotein occupy spatially separate and discrete regions in the capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Virulence 2010, 1, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Rajasingham, R.; Smith, R.M.; Park, B.J.; Jarvis, J.N.; Govender, N.P.; Chiller, T.M.; Boulware, D.R. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: An updated analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 873–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Casadevall, A.; Coelho, C.; Cordero, R.J.; Dragotakes, Q.; Jung, E.; Vij, R.; Wear, M.P. The capsule of Cryptococcus neoformans. Virulence 2019, 10, 822–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bermas, A.; Geddes-McAlister, J. Combatting the evolution of antifungal resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans. Mol. Microbiol. 2020, 114, 721–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rhodes, J.; Beale, M.A.; Vanhove, M.; Jarvis, J.N.; Kannambath, S.; Simpson, J.A.; Bicanic, T. A population genomics approach to assessing the genetic basis of within-host microevolution underlying recurrent cryptococcal meningitis infection. G3 Genes Genomes Genet. 2017, 7, 1165–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Smith, K.D.; Achan, B.; Hullsiek, K.H.; McDonald, T.R.; Okagaki, L.H.; Alhadab, A.A.; Nielsen, K. Increased antifungal drug resistance in Cryptococcus neoformans in Uganda. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 7197–7204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Klafke, G.B.; Moreira, G.M.; Monte, L.G.; Pereira, J.L.; Brandolt, T.M.; Xavier, M.O.; Santi-Gadelha, T.; Dellagostin, O.A.; Pinto, L.S. Assessment of plant lectin antifungal potential against yeasts of major importance in medical mycology. Mycopathologia 2013, 175, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sharma, S.; Raj, K.; Riyaz, M.; Singh, D.D. Antimicrobial studies on garlic lectin. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2023, 15, 1501–1512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kumar, S.; Jitendra, K.; Singh, K.; Kapoor, V.; Sinha, M.; Xess, I.; Das, S.N.; Sharma, S.; Singh, T.P.; Dey, S. Biological Properties and Characterization of ASL50 Protein from Aged Allium sativum Bulbs. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2015, 176, 1914–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ferreira, G.R.S.; Brito, J.S.; Procópio, T.F.; Santos, N.D.L.; Lima, B.J.R.C.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Napoleão, T.H. Antimicrobial potential of Alpinia purpurata lectin (ApuL): Growth inhibitory action, synergistic effects in combination with antibiotics, and antibiofilm activity. Microb. Pathog. 2018, 124, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Procópio, T.F.; Patriota, L.L.S.; Moura, M.C.; Silva, P.M.; Oliveira, A.P.S.; Carvalho, L.V.N.; Lima, T.A.; Soares, T.; Silva, T.D.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; et al. CasuL: A new lectin isolated from Calliandra surinamensis leaf pinnulae with cytotoxicity to cancer cells, antimicrobial activity and antibiofilm effect. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2017, 98, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Gomes, B.S.; Siqueira, A.B.S.; Maia, R.D.C.C.; Giampaoli, V.; Teixeira, E.H.; Arruda, F.V.S.; Porto, A.L.F. Antifungal activity of lectins against yeast of vaginal secretion. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2012, 43, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Fonseca, V.J.A.; Braga, A.L.; Almeida, R.S.; Silva, T.G.; Silva, J.C.P.; Lima, L.F.; Morais-Braga, M.F.B. Lectins ConA and ConM extracted from Canavalia ensiformis (L.) DC and Canavalia rosea (Sw.) DC inhibit planktonic Candida albicans and Candida tropicalis. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Silva, R.R.S.; Malveira, E.A.; Aguiar, T.K.; Neto, N.A.; Roma, R.R.; Santos, M.H.; Teixeira, C.S. DVL lectin from Dioclea violacea seeds acts against Candida spp. via carbohydrate recognition domain. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2023, 382, 110639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Silva, R.R.S.; Santos, M.H.C.; Santos, A.L.E.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Carneiro, R.F.; Nagano, C.S.; Mesquita, F.P.; Souza, P.F.N.; Teixeira, C.S. Proteomic analysis reveals that DVL lectin from Dioclea violacea seeds alters the protein profile of Candida albicans. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 40046–40055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Silva, R.R.S.; Carvalho, R.J.P.; Santos, M.H.C.; Santos, A.L.E.; Carneiro, R.F.; Nagano, C.S.; Souza, P.F.N.; Teixeira, C.S. DVL, a lectin from Dioclea violacea seeds, disturbs the proteomic profile of Candida krusei, leading to cell death. Antibiotics 2025, 14, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Del Río, M.V.; Radicioni, M.B.; Mello, É.O.; Ribeiro, S.F.; Taveira, G.B.; Carvalho, A.O.; Regente, M. A plant mannose-binding lectin and fluconazole: Key targets combination against Candida albicans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2022, 132, 4310–4320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Del Río, M.V.; Radicioni, M.B.; Cutine, A.M.; Mariño, K.V.; Mora-Montes, H.M.; Cagnoni, A.J.; Regente, M.C. The sunflower jacalin Helja: Biological and structural insights of its antifungal activity against Candida albicans. Glycobiology 2024, 34, cwae058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dias, L.P.; Santos, A.L.; Araújo, N.M.; Silva, R.R.; Santos, M.H.; Roma, R.R.; Teixeira, C.S. Machaerium acutifolium lectin alters membrane structure and induces ROS production in Candida parapsilosis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 163, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Oliveira, R.M.V.V.; Junior, A.R.C.; Silva, P.M.; Ferreira, G.R.S.; Amorim, P.K.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Silva, L.C.N.; Patriota, L.L.S.; Pontual, E.V.; Napoleão, T.H. Evaluation of the antifungal activity of Microgramma vacciniifolia frond lectin (MvFL) against pathogenic yeasts. Macromol 2025, 5, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Neto, J.X.S.; Dias, L.P.; Souza, L.A.L.; Costa, H.P.S.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Pereira, M.L.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Cardozo, C.J.P.; Moura, L.F.W.G.; Sousa, J.S.; et al. Insights into the structure and mechanism of action of the anti-candidal lectin Mo-CBP2 and evaluation of its synergistic effect and antibiofilm activity. Process Biochem. 2022, 121, 661–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Neto, J.X.S.; Leite, L.O.; Silva, A.P.A.; Guedes, M.I.F.; Sousa, D.O.B. Advancing the Understanding of the Mo-CBP2 Protein: Unraveling Its Antifungal and Antibiofilm Properties Against Candida Species. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Silva, S.P.; Silva, J.D.F.; Costa, C.B.L.; Silva, P.M.; Freitas, A.F.S.; Silva, C.E.S.; Silva, A.R.; Oliveira, A.M.; Sá, R.A.; Peixoto, A.R.; et al. Purification and antimicrobial activity of Portulaca elatior leaf lectin (PeLL). Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2023, 15, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Silva, J.D.F.; Silva, S.P.; Silva, P.M.; Vieira, A.M.; Araújo, L.C.C.; Lima, T.A.; Oliveira, A.P.S.; Carvalho, L.V.N.; Pitta, M.G.R.; Rêgo, M.J.B.M.; et al. Portulaca elatior root contains a trehalose-binding lectin with antimicrobial activities. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 126, 291–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Silva, P.M.; Moura, M.C.; Gomes, F.S.; Trentin, D.S.; Oliveira, A.P.S.; Mello, G.S.V.; Pitta, M.G.R.; Rego, M.J.B.M.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Macedo, A.J.; et al. PgTeL, the lectin in Punica granatum juice, is an antifungal agent against Candida albicans and Candida krusei. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 108, 391–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nabeta, H.W.; Kouokam, J.C.; Lasnik, A.B.; Fuqua, J.L.; Palmer, K.E. Novel antifungal activity of Q-Griffithsin, a broad-spectrum antiviral lectin. Microbiol. Spectr. 2021, 9, e00957-21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gomes, F.S.; Procópio, T.F.; Napoleão, T.H.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Paiva, P.M.G. Antimicrobial lectin from Schinus terebinthifolius leaf. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 114, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Santos, L.M.M.; Silva, P.M.; Moura, M.C.; Junior, A.C.; Amorim, P.K.; Procópio, T.F.; Napoleão, T.H. Anti-Candida activity of the water-soluble lectin from Moringa oleifera seeds (WSMoL). J. Med. Mycol. 2021, 31, 101074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Nabeta, H.W.; Lasnik, A.B.; Fuqua, J.L.; Wang, L.; Rohan, L.C.; Palmer, K.E. Antiviral lectin Q-Griffithsin suppresses fungal infection in murine models of vaginal candidiasis. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 976033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bazán, J.M.N.; Chagas, V.L.; Silva, R.G.; Silva, I.S.S.; Araujo, J.G.N.; Silva, L.S.; Batista, K.L.R.; Silva, R.R.S.; Correia, M.T.S.; Sousa, J.C.S.; et al. Development and characterization of alginate-derived bioadhesive films incorporated with anti-infective lectins for application in the treatment of oral candidiasis. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology 2023, 90, 105114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Moura, K.S.; Silva, H.R.C.; Dornelles, L.P.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Napoleão, T.H.; Oliveira, M.D.L.; Paiva, P.M.G. Coagulant activity of water-soluble Moringa oleifera lectin is linked to lowering of electrical resistance and inhibited by monosaccharides and magnesium ions. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 180, 1361–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Brito, J.S.; Ferreira, G.R.S.; Klimczak, E.; Gryshuk, L.; Santos, N.D.L.; Patriota, L.L.S.; Moreira, L.R.; Soares, A.K.A.; Barboza, B.R.; Paiva, P.M.G.; et al. Lectin from inflorescences of ornamental crop Alpinia purpurata acts on immune cells to promote Th1 and Th17 responses, nitric oxide release, and lymphocyte activation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 94, 865–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Barros, M.C.; Silva, S.S.S.; Gagliano, E.P.; Santos, A.N.S.; Patriota, L.L.S.; Ferreira, G.R.S.; Silva, P.M.; Alves, S.D.P.L.; Maux, J.M.L.; Silva Neto, J.C.; et al. Acute toxicity and genotoxicity of cMoL, a lectin from Moringa oleifera seeds with antifungal activity against Cryptococcus strains. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Videres, L.C.C.A.; Barros, M.C.; Procópio, T.F.; Ferreira, G.R.S.; Silva, P.M.; Batista, A.M.; Guerra, M.M.P.; Vainstein, M.H.; Aguiar, J.S.; Lima, T.A.; et al. Myracrodruon urundeuva lectins present anticancer and anticryptococcal activities with low cytotoxic effects. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2023, 157, 614–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ferreira, G.R.S.; Silva, P.M.; Lopes, W.; Feitosa, A.P.S.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Brayner, F.A.; Alves, L.C.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Moura, M.C.; Vainstein, M.H.; et al. Pomegranate sarcotesta lectin (PgTeL) inhibits planktonic growth and disrupts biofilm formed by Cryptococcus neoformans. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2023, 134, lxad150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Jones, T.H.; McClelland, E.E.; McFeeters, H.; McFeeters, R.L. Novel antifungal activity for the lectin scytovirin: Inhibition of Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Santos, L.M.M.; Ferreira, G.R.S.; Oliveira, W.F.; Silva, S.P.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Correia, M.T.S.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Fontes, A.; Filho, P.E.C.; Vainstein, M.H.; et al. Moringa oleifera seed lectin (WSMoL) exerts fungistatic and antibiofilm effects on Cryptococcus yeast, causing lysosomal and mitochondrial damage. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2024, 171, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hamid, Z.M.; Hussin, Z.S.; Muslim, S.N.; Mohammed, E.S.; Sabre, H.M. Antibiofilm formation activity of purified lectin from wheat seeds (Triticum aestivum) against Candida albicans causing oral candidiasis. Tex. J. Multidiscip. Stud. 2023, 15, 150–156. [Google Scholar]
  63. Procópio, T.F.; Patriota, L.L.S.; Barros, B.R.S.; Aguiar, L.M.S.; Lorena, V.M.B.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Melo, C.M.L.; Napoleão, T.H. Calliandra surinamensis lectin (CasuL) does not impair the functionality of mice splenocytes, promoting cell signaling and cytokine production. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 107, 650–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Santos, A.J.C.A.; Barros, B.R.S.; Aguiar, L.M.S.; Patriota, L.L.S.; Lima, T.A.; Zingali, R.B.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Napoleão, T.H.; Melo, C.M.L.; Pontual, E.V. Schinus terebinthifolia leaf lectin (SteLL) is an immunomodulatory agent by altering cytokine release by mice splenocytes. 3 Biotech 2020, 10, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Santos, A.L.E.; Júnior, C.P.S.; Neto, R.N.M.; Santos, M.H.C.; Santos, V.F.; Rocha, B.A.M.; Sousa, E.M.; Carvalho, R.C.; Menezes, I.R.A.; Oliveira, M.R.C.; et al. Machaerium acutifolium lectin inhibits inflammatory responses through cytokine modulation. Process Biochem. 2020, 97, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Silva, A.R.; Alves, R.R.V.; Silva, S.P.; Branco, S.J.S.C.; Marinho, A.O.; Souza, T.G.S.; Chagas, C.A.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Oliveira, A.M.; Napoleão, T.H. Acute toxicity and genotoxicity assessment of PgTeL, a lectin from pomegranate sarcotesta, in mice. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2022, 151, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bisneto, A.V.M.; Fernandes, A.S.; Silva, L.C.; Silva, L.S.; Araújo, D.P.; Santos, I.C.; Melo, M.R.; Silva, R.R.d.S.; Franchi, L.P.; Cardoso, C.G.; et al. Dioclea violacea lectin inhibits tumorigenesis and tumor angiogenesis in vivo. Biochimie 2024, 222, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Marinho, A.O.; Costa, J.A.; Santos, A.N.S.; Barros, M.C.; Pimentel, C.N.; Silva, A.A.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Napoleão, T.H.; Patriota, L.L.S. Assessment of acute toxicity, genotoxicity, and anti-inflammatory activity of SteLL, a lectin from Schinus terebinthifolia Raddi. leaves, in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2024, 333, 118496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Barton, C.; Kouokam, J.C.; Lasnik, A.B.; Foreman, O.; Cambon, A.; Brock, G.; Montefiori, D.C.; Vojdani, F.; McCormick, A.A.; O’Keefe, B.R.; et al. Activity of and Effect of Subcutaneous Treatment with the Broad-Spectrum Antiviral Lectin Griffithsin in Two Laboratory Rodent Models. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 120–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kouokam, J.C.; Lasnik, A.B.; Palmer, K.E. Studies in a Murine Model Confirm the Safety of Griffithsin and Advocate Its Further Development as a Microbicide Targeting HIV-1 and Other Enveloped Viruses. Viruses 2016, 8, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Brito, J.S.; Marinho, A.O.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; Oliveira, A.M.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Patriota, L.L.S.; Napoleão, T.H. Toxicity and antitumor activity of the water-soluble lectin from Moringa oleifera Lam. seeds (WSMoL) in sarcoma 180-bearing mice. Toxicon 2023, 234, 107306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Heymann, F.; Hamesch, K.; Weiskirchen, R.; Tacke, F. The concanavalin A model of acute hepatitis in mice. Lab. Anim. 2015, 49, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Barbosa, T.; Arruda, S.; Cavada, B.; Grangeiro, T.B.; de Freitas, L.A.R.; Barral-Netto, M. In vivo lymphocyte activation and apoptosis by lectins of the Diocleinae subtribe. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2001, 96, 673–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Patriota, L.L.S.; Ramos, D.B.M.; Silva, Y.A.; Amorim dos Santos, A.C.L.; Araújo, M.T.M.F.; Brito, J.S.; Torres, D.J.L.; Oliveira, A.M.; Silva, D.C.N.; Lorena, V.M.B.; et al. Microgramma vacciniifolia frond lectin (MvFL) exhibits antitumor activity against sarcoma 180 in mice. Phytomedicine Plus 2021, 1, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Soares, G.S.F.; Assreuy, A.M.S.; Gadelha, C.A.A.; Gomes, V.M.; Delatorre, P.; Simões, R.C.C.; Cavada, B.S.; Leite, J.F.; Nagano, C.S.; Pinto, N.V.; et al. Purification and Biological Activities of Abelmoschus esculentus Seed Lectin. Protein J. 2012, 31, 674–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Neto, L.G.N.; Pinto, L.S.; Bastos, R.M.; Evaristo, F.F.V.; Vasconcelos, M.A.V.; Carneiro, V.A.; Arruda, F.V.S.; Porto, A.L.F.; Leal, R.B.; Júnior, V.A.S.; et al. Effect of the Lectin of Bauhinia variegata and Its Recombinant Isoform on Surgically Induced Skin Wounds in a Murine Model. Molecules 2011, 16, 9298–9315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Russi, M.A.; Vandresen-Filho, S.; Rieger, D.K.; Costa, A.P.; Lopes, M.W.; Cunha, R.M.S.; Teixeira, E.H.; Nascimento, K.S.; Cavada, B.S.; Tasca, C.I.; et al. ConBr, a Lectin from Canavalia brasiliensis Seeds, Protects Against Quinolinic Acid-Induced Seizures in Mice. Neurochem. Res. 2012, 37, 288–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Barauna, S.C.; Kaster, M.P.; Heckert, B.T.; Nascimento, K.S.; Rossi, F.M.; Teixeira, E.H.; Cavada, B.S.; Rodrigues, A.L.S.; Leal, R.B. Antidepressant-like effect of lectin from Canavalia brasiliensis (ConBr) administered centrally in mice. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2006, 85, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Oliveira, S.R.B.D.; Franco, Á.X.; Quaresma, M.P.; de Carvalho, C.M.M.; Marques, F.C.J.; Pantoja, P.D.S.; Mendonça, V.A.; Osterne, V.J.S.; Correia, J.L.A.; Assreuy, A.M.S.; et al. Anti-inflammatory and anti-necrotic effects of lectins from Canavalia ensiformis and Canavalia brasiliensis in experimental acute pancreatitis. Glycoconj. J. 2022, 39, 599–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Aguiar, L.M.S.; Alves, M.M.M.; Sobrinho, E.P.C., Jr.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Carvalho, F.A.A.; Albuquerque, L.P.; Patriota, L.L.S.; Napoleão, T.H. Microgramma vacciniifolia frond lectin: In vitro anti-leishmanial activity and immunomodulatory effects against internalized amastigote forms of Leishmania amazonensis. Acta Parasitol. 2023, 68, 869–879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Patriota, L.L.S.; Ramos, D.B.M.; Silva, M.G.E.; Amorim dos Santos, A.C.L.; Silva, Y.A.; Paiva, P.M.G.; Pontual, E.V.; de Albuquerque, L.P.; Mendes, R.L.; Napoleão, T.H. Inhibition of Carrageenan-Induced Acute Inflammation in Mice by the Microgramma vacciniifolia Frond Lectin (MvFL). Polymers 2022, 14, 1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Barbosa, F.E.V.; Sousa, V.C.; Lima, D.B.; Santos, A.L.E.; Carvalho, R.C.V.; Alves, M.M.M.; Lima, M.A.P.; Silva, C.G.L.; Souza, R.O.S.; Teixeira, C.S. Dioclea violacea lectin has potent in vitro leishmanicidal activity against Leishmania infantum via carbohydrate recognition domain. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 280, 135665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lavelle, E.C.; Grant, G.; Pusztai, A.; Pfuller, U.; O’Hagan, D.T. Mucosal immunogenicity of plant lectins in mice. Immunology 2000, 99, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Lavelle, E.C.; Grant, G.; Pfuller, U.; O’Hagan, D.T. Immunological implications of the use of plant lectins for drug and vaccine targeting to the gastrointestinal tract. J. Drug Target. 2004, 12, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Konozy, E.H.E.; Osman, M.E.M. From inflammation to immune regulation: The dual nature of dietary lectins in health and disease. Heliyon 2024, 10, e39471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Clement, F.; Venkatesh, Y.P. Dietary garlic (Allium sativum) lectins, ASA I and ASA II, are highly stable and immunogenic. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2010, 10, 1161–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Padiyappa, S.D.; Avalappa, H.; Somegowda, M.; Sridhara, S.; Venkatesh, Y.P.; Prabhakar, B.T.; Pramod, S.N.; Almujaydil, M.S.; Shokralla, S.; Abdelbacki, A.M.M.; et al. Immunoadjuvant and Humoral Immune Responses of Garlic (Allium sativum L.) Lectins upon Systemic and Mucosal Administration in BALB/c Mice. Molecules 2022, 27, 1375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Baral, K.C.; Choi, K.Y. Barriers and strategies for oral peptide and protein therapeutics delivery: Update on clinical advances. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Chen, G.; Kang, W.; Li, W.; Chen, S.; Gao, Y. Oral delivery of protein and peptide drugs: From non-specific formulation approaches to intestinal cell targeting strategies. Theranostics 2022, 12, 1419–1439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Menacho-Melgar, R.; Decker, J.S.; Hennigan, J.N.; Lynch, M.D. A review of lipidation in the development of advanced protein and peptide therapeutics. J. Control. Release 2019, 295, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mu, J.; Vong, E.; Carmali, S. Artificial lipidation of proteins and peptides: From mechanism to clinical applications. FEBS J. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Santos, J.H.P.M.; Torres-Obreque, K.M.; Meneguetti, G.P.; Amaro, B.P.; Rangel-Yagui, C.O. Protein PEGylation for the design of biobetters: From reaction to purification processes. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 54, e01009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Perinelli, D.R.; Cespi, M.; Pucciarelli, S.; Vincenzetti, S.; Casettari, L.; Lam, J.K.W.; Logrippo, S.; Canala, E.; Soliman, M.E.; Bonacucina, G.; et al. Water-in-oil microemulsions for protein delivery: Loading optimization and stability. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2017, 18, 410–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Salawi, A. Self-emulsifying drug delivery systems: A novel approach to deliver drugs. Drug Deliv. 2022, 29, 1811–1823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Cunha, C.R.A.; Silva, L.C.N.; Almeida, F.J.F.; Ferraz, M.S.; Varejão, N.; Cartaxo, M.F.S.; Miranda, R.C.M.; Aguiar, F.C.A., Jr.; Santos, N.P.S.; Coelho, L.C.B.B.; et al. Encapsulation into stealth liposomes enhances the antitumor action of recombinant Cratylia mollis lectin expressed in Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Soliman, M.M.; El-Shatoury, E.H.; El-Araby, M.M.I. Antibacterial and anticancer activities of three novel lectin-conjugated chitosan nanoparticles. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2024, 108, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Izadiyan, Z.; Misran, M.; Kalantari, K.; Webster, T.J.; Basrowi, N.A.; Rasouli, E.; Shameli, K. Advancements in liposomal nanomedicines: Innovative formulations, therapeutic applications, and future directions in precision medicine. Int. J. Nanomed. 2025, 20, 1213–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Santos, M.C.; Kroetz, T.; Dora, C.L.; Giacomelli, F.C.; Frizon, T.E.A.; Pich, C.T.; Pinto, L.S.; Soares, A.S.; Rodembusch, F.S.; Lima, V.R.; et al. Elucidating Bauhinia variegata lectin/phosphatidylcholine interactions in lectin-containing liposomes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 519, 232–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Osterne, V.J.S.; Verduijn, J.; Lossio, C.F.; Parakhonskiy, B.; Oliveira, M.V.; Pinto-Junior, V.R.; Nascimento, K.S.; Skirtach, A.G.; Van Damme, E.J.M.; Cavada, B.S. Antiproliferative activity of Dioclea violacea lectin in CaCO3 particles on cancer cells after controlled release. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 8854–8868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Bodenberger, N.; Kubiczek, D.; Halbgebauer, D.; Rimola, V.; Wiese, S.; Mayer, D.; Rodriguez Alfonso, A.A.; Ständker, L.; Stenger, S.; Rosenau, F. Lectin-functionalized composite hydrogels for “capture-and-killing” of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19, 2472–2482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 14 00105 g001
Figure 1. Lectin recognition of carbohydrate structures on the yeast cells. Lectins can bind specifically and reversibly to glycan residues on the fungal cell surface through their carbohydrate binding sites, mediating interactions with mono-, oligo-, polysaccharides and glycoproteins. This specific molecular recognition underlies diverse biological processes, including cell signaling, adhesion, and antimicrobial activity. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/p48asim.
Figure 1. Lectin recognition of carbohydrate structures on the yeast cells. Lectins can bind specifically and reversibly to glycan residues on the fungal cell surface through their carbohydrate binding sites, mediating interactions with mono-, oligo-, polysaccharides and glycoproteins. This specific molecular recognition underlies diverse biological processes, including cell signaling, adhesion, and antimicrobial activity. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/p48asim.
Biomedicines 14 00105 g001
Biomedicines 14 00105 g002
Figure 2. Schematic overview of lectin-specific mechanisms of action on Candida. The figure illustrates lectin interactions with filamentous Candida structures and a zoomed representative fungal cell used as a schematic model to summarize lectin-specific effects reported in the literature. Distinct mechanisms are highlighted for individual lectins: Allium sativum agglutinin (ASA) stimulates H2O2 production, resulting in cell clumping, shrinkage, and bulge formation; Dioclea violacea seed lectin (DvL) induces cell wall damage, interferes with membrane biosynthesis, and promotes organelle impairment; Machaerium acutifolium seed lectin (MaL) increases membrane permeability, disrupts H+-ATPase function, triggers oxidative stress, and leads to DNA damage; and Microgramma vacciniifolia frond lectin (MvFL) targets intracellular compartments, causing lysosomal disruption and mitochondrial depolarization. The illustrated effects represent individual lectin-mediated actions and do not imply simultaneous or synergistic activity within a single fungal cell. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/aznf0t7.
Figure 2. Schematic overview of lectin-specific mechanisms of action on Candida. The figure illustrates lectin interactions with filamentous Candida structures and a zoomed representative fungal cell used as a schematic model to summarize lectin-specific effects reported in the literature. Distinct mechanisms are highlighted for individual lectins: Allium sativum agglutinin (ASA) stimulates H2O2 production, resulting in cell clumping, shrinkage, and bulge formation; Dioclea violacea seed lectin (DvL) induces cell wall damage, interferes with membrane biosynthesis, and promotes organelle impairment; Machaerium acutifolium seed lectin (MaL) increases membrane permeability, disrupts H+-ATPase function, triggers oxidative stress, and leads to DNA damage; and Microgramma vacciniifolia frond lectin (MvFL) targets intracellular compartments, causing lysosomal disruption and mitochondrial depolarization. The illustrated effects represent individual lectin-mediated actions and do not imply simultaneous or synergistic activity within a single fungal cell. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/aznf0t7.
Biomedicines 14 00105 g002
Biomedicines 14 00105 g003
Figure 3. Conceptual models illustrating lectin-mediated mechanisms of action on Cryptococcus. The left panel illustrates lectin interactions with Cryptococcus yeast cells. The mechanistic panel presents representative cellular and community-level models summarizing distinct effects of individual lectins described in the literature. WSMoL induces lysosomal damage, affecting intracellular compartment integrity. Scytovirin is associated with a reduction in capsule size, impacting capsular architecture. PgTeL reduces biofilm formation and metabolic activity, indicating impaired cellular function at the community level. The depicted effects represent independent lectin-mediated mechanisms and do not indicate simultaneous or synergistic actions within a single cell or biofilm. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/ugxjnac.
Figure 3. Conceptual models illustrating lectin-mediated mechanisms of action on Cryptococcus. The left panel illustrates lectin interactions with Cryptococcus yeast cells. The mechanistic panel presents representative cellular and community-level models summarizing distinct effects of individual lectins described in the literature. WSMoL induces lysosomal damage, affecting intracellular compartment integrity. Scytovirin is associated with a reduction in capsule size, impacting capsular architecture. PgTeL reduces biofilm formation and metabolic activity, indicating impaired cellular function at the community level. The depicted effects represent independent lectin-mediated mechanisms and do not indicate simultaneous or synergistic actions within a single cell or biofilm. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/ugxjnac.
Biomedicines 14 00105 g003
Biomedicines 14 00105 g004
Figure 4. Synergistic antifungal activity between lectins and conventional antifungals. The combined action of lectins and conventional antifungal agents enhances fungicidal efficacy by simultaneously targeting membrane and intracellular structures, resulting in extensive cell damage and apoptosis-like cell death. This cooperative mechanism improves therapeutic efficiency while contributing to lower effective doses, reduced adverse effects, and decreased likelihood of resistance development. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/gb481k9.
Figure 4. Synergistic antifungal activity between lectins and conventional antifungals. The combined action of lectins and conventional antifungal agents enhances fungicidal efficacy by simultaneously targeting membrane and intracellular structures, resulting in extensive cell damage and apoptosis-like cell death. This cooperative mechanism improves therapeutic efficiency while contributing to lower effective doses, reduced adverse effects, and decreased likelihood of resistance development. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/gb481k9.
Biomedicines 14 00105 g004
Biomedicines 14 00105 g005
Figure 5. Overview of translational challenges associated with antifungal lectins. The figure summarizes the major translational barriers limiting the clinical application of antifungal lectins, organized into three interconnected axes: toxicity assessment, immunogenicity and immunomodulatory effects, and formulation and drug delivery. The toxicological axis depicts a stepwise pipeline, starting with in vitro cytotoxicity assays (e.g., hemolysis), following to in vivo preclinical studies in animal models evaluating acute, subacute, and chronic toxicity, which collectively support the feasibility of future clinical applications. The immunogenicity axis highlights the potential recognition of lectins by components of the immune system, such as immune cells and antibodies, emphasizing the need to control or reduce immunogenic responses during therapeutic development through protein engineering-based strategies. Finally, the drug delivery axis presents formulation strategies designed to overcome pharmacological limitations of lectins, including improved oral forms, liposomal and polymeric nanoformulations, semi-solid formulations, mucoadhesive films, and parenteral or inhalable delivery systems. Together, these three axes highlight the multidisciplinary challenges that must be integrated to enable the translational development of lectin-based antifungal therapies. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/wgpc67n.
Figure 5. Overview of translational challenges associated with antifungal lectins. The figure summarizes the major translational barriers limiting the clinical application of antifungal lectins, organized into three interconnected axes: toxicity assessment, immunogenicity and immunomodulatory effects, and formulation and drug delivery. The toxicological axis depicts a stepwise pipeline, starting with in vitro cytotoxicity assays (e.g., hemolysis), following to in vivo preclinical studies in animal models evaluating acute, subacute, and chronic toxicity, which collectively support the feasibility of future clinical applications. The immunogenicity axis highlights the potential recognition of lectins by components of the immune system, such as immune cells and antibodies, emphasizing the need to control or reduce immunogenic responses during therapeutic development through protein engineering-based strategies. Finally, the drug delivery axis presents formulation strategies designed to overcome pharmacological limitations of lectins, including improved oral forms, liposomal and polymeric nanoformulations, semi-solid formulations, mucoadhesive films, and parenteral or inhalable delivery systems. Together, these three axes highlight the multidisciplinary challenges that must be integrated to enable the translational development of lectin-based antifungal therapies. Created in BioRender. Lira, T.L.S. (2025) https://BioRender.com/wgpc67n.
Biomedicines 14 00105 g005
Table 1. Representative lectins with activity against Candida spp. and Nakaseomyces glabratus: carbohydrate specificity, experimental data, and observed effects.
Table 1. Representative lectins with activity against Candida spp. and Nakaseomyces glabratus: carbohydrate specificity, experimental data, and observed effects.
LectinBinding CarbohydratesProtocolTarget FungiEndpoint
(Incubation Time)		EffectsReference
Abelmoschus esculentus leaf lectin (AEL)Lactose, fructose, mannoseBroth microdilution
(CLSI M27-A2)		C. parapsilosis
FAMED-FURG		MIC: 0.97 µg/mL (48 h) MFC: 31.25 µg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic
Fungicidal		[31]
Allium sativum agglutinin (ASA)Mannose, oligosaccharidesBroth microdilution (CLSI M100)C. auris NCCPF470153MIC: 42 µg/mL (24 h)Fungistatic
Oxidative stress
Morphological alterations
Cell wall disruption		[32]
C. auris NCCPF470197MIC: 69 µg/mL (24 h)
C. auris NCCPF470200MIC: 30 µg/mL (24 h)
N. glabratus NCCPF100037MIC: 43 µg/mL (24 h)
N. glabratus NCCPF100033MIC: 56 µg/mL (24 h)
N. glabratus ATCC2001MIC: 33 µg/mL (24 h)
N. glabratus MTCC3019MIC: 49 µg/mL (24 h)
Allium sativum bulb lectin 50 (ASL50)MannoseBroth microdilution (CLSI M27-A3)C. krusei ATCC6258 MIC: 40 µg/mL (24 h)Fungistatic
Cell wall disruption		[33]
C. parapsilosis ATCC22019 MIC: 10 µg/mL (24 h)
C. tropicalis ATCC13803MIC: 20 µg/mL (24 h)
N. glabratus ATCC15126MIC: 80 µg/mL (24 h)
Clinical isolatesMIC: 10–40 µg/mL (24 h)
Alpinia purpurata inflorescence lectin (ApuL)Oligosaccharide chains Broth microdilution C. albicans URM 5901MIC: 200 µg/mL (24 h)Fungistatic
Morphological alterations		[34]
C. parapsilosis URM 6345MIC: 400 µg/mL (24 h)
Bauhinia variegata seed lectin (BVL)Galactose,
N-acetyl-galactosamine		Broth microdilution (CLSI M27-A2)C. parapsilosis
FAMED-FURG		MIC: 125 µg/mL (48 h) MFC: 500 µg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic
Fungicidal		[31]
Calliandra surinamensis leaf pinnulae lectin (CasuL)Oligosaccharide chainsBroth microdilutionC. krusei URM 6391MIC: 125 μg/mL (24 h)
MFC: 250 μg/mL (24 h)		Fungistatic
Fungicidal
Cell wall disruption		[35]
Canavalia brasiliensis seed lectin (ConBr)Glucose, mannoseBroth microdilution (CLSI M27-A2)C. parapsilosis
FAMED-FURG		MIC: 125 µg/mL (48 h) MFC: 500 µg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic
Fungicidal		[31,36]
C. albicans URM 4987MIC: 8 µg/mL (48 h)
C. guilliermondii URM 4975MIC: 8 µg/mL (48 h)
C. membranaefaciens URM 4983MIC: 2 µg/mL (48 h)
C. shehatae URM 4978MIC: 2 µg/mL (48 h)
C. tropicalis URM 4989MIC: 8 µg/mL (48 h)
Canavalia ensiformis agglutinin (ConA)Glucose, MannoseBroth microdilution C. albicans ATCC 10231IC50: 539.1 µg/mL (24 h)Fungistatic
Inhibition of yeast-to-hyphae transition		[37]
C. tropicalis ATCC 13803IC50: 502.5 µg/mL (24 h)
Canavalia rosea seed lectin (ConM)Trehalose, Maltose, Glucose, Fructose, Sacarose, MannoseBroth microdilution C. albicans ATCC 10231IC50: 607.2 µg/mL (24 h)Fungistatic
Inhibition of yeast-to-hyphae transition		[37]
C. tropicalis ATCC 13803IC50: 405.5 µg/mL (24 h)
Clitoria fairchildiana seed lectinN.I.Broth microdilution (CLSI M27-A2)C. parapsilosis
FAMED-FURG		MIC: 1.95 µg/mL (48 h) MFC: 3.90 µg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic
Fungicidal		[31]
Dioclea rostrata seed lectin (DRL)Glucose, MannoseBroth microdilution (CLSI M27-A2)C. guilliermondii URM4975MIC: 128 µg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic[36]
C. membranaefaciens URM4983MIC: 64 µg/mL (48 h)
C. shehatae URM4978MIC: 4 µg/mL (48 h)
Dioclea virgata seeds lectinComplex sugarsBroth microdilution (CLSI M27-A2)C. parapsilosis
FAMED-FURG		MIC: 3.9 µg/mL (48 h) Fungistatic[31]
Dioclea violacea seed lectin (DvL) aGlucose, MannoseBroth microdilution (CLSI M27-A3)C. albicans ATCC 10231MIC: 0.6 µM (24 h)Fungistatic effect
Cell wall damage
Oxidative stress
Inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis
Apoptosis		[38,39,40]
C. krusei ATCC 6258MIC: 9.8 µM (24 h)
C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019MIC: 0.6 µM (24 h)
Helianthus annuus jacalin (Helja)MannoseBroth microdilution C. albicans NGY152MIC: 65 µg/mL (30 h)Morphological alterations
Binding to mannans 		[41,42]
Machaerium acutifolium seed lectin (MaL) aMannose,
N-acetyl-glucosamine		Broth microdilution C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019MIC/MFC: 18 µM (24 h)Fungistatic
Fungicidal
Increased membrane permeability
Disruption of H+-ATPase
Oxidative stress
DNA damage		[43]
Microgramma vacciniifolia frond lectin (MvFL)Oligosaccharide chainsBroth microdilution C. albicans URM-5901MIC: 20 µg/mL (24 h)For N. glabratus:
Fungistatic
Lysosomal disruption
Impairment of mitochondrial membrane potential.		[44]
C. krusei URM-6391MIC: 1.25 µg/mL (24 h)
C. tropicalis URM-6551MIC: 40 µg/mL (24 h)
C. parapsilosis URM-6951MIC: 40 µg/mL (24 h)
N. glabratus URM-4246MIC: 0.625 µg/mL (24 h)
Moringa oleifera chitin-binding protein 2 (Mo-CBP-2) aChitinBroth microdilutionC. albicans ATCC 10231MIC: 18.9 μM (48 h)
MFC: 100 μM (48 h)		Fungistatic
Fungicidal
Reduced metabolism		[45,46]
C. krusei ATCC 6258MIC: 20–45 μM (48 h)
MFC: 100 μM (48 h)
C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019
C. tropicalis (clinical isolate)
Mucuna pruriens seedsCarrageenanCLSI
M27-A2		C. parapsilosis
FAMED-FURG		MIC: 1.95 µg/mL (48 h)
MFC: 3.9 µg/mL (48 h) 		Fungistatic
Fungicidal		[31]
Portulaca elatior leaf lectin (PeLL)Chitin, Mannose, GalactoseBroth microdilution C. albicans URM 5901MIC: 1.48 µg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic
Fungicidal		[47]
C. krusei URM 6351 MIC: 1.48 µg/mL (48 h)
C. tropicalis URM 6551 MIC: 1.48 µg/mL (48 h)
C. parapsilosis URM 6345MIC: 0.74 µg/mL (48 h)
Portulaca elatior root lectin (PeRoL)Threalose, Glucose, Galactose, Mannose
N-acetyl-glucosamine
Oligosaccharide chains		Broth microdilution C. albicans URM-7098MIC/MFC: 16 µg/mL (24 h)Fungistatic and fungicidal effects[48]
C. tropicalis URM-7092
C. krusei URM-6391
C. parapsilosis URM-7087
Punica granatum sarcotesta lectin (PgTeL)Chitin, Oligosaccharide chainsBroth microdilution C. albicans URM 5901MIC: 25 µg/mL (24 h)
MFC: 50 µg/mL (24 h) 		Fungistatic
Fungicidal
Decrease in ATP levels
Lipid peroxidation
Cell wall damage		[49]
C. krusei URM 6391MIC: 12.5 μg/mL (24 h)
MFC: 12.5 µg/mL (24 h)
Q-GriffithsinGlucose, Mannose,
N-acetyl-glucosamine		EUCAST
EDef 7.1		Candida albicans ATCC 32020MIC: 6 µg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic
Fungicidal
Binding to α-mannan
Cell wall disruption
Oxidative stress		[50]
C. glabrata CDC316MIC: 95 µg/mL (48 h)
C. parapsilosis CDC337MIC: 24 µg/mL (48 h)
C. krusei CDC397MIC: 95 µg/mL (48 h)
C. auris CDC388MIC: 48 µg/mL (48 h)
C. auris CDC389MIC: 95 µg/mL (48 h)
Schinus terebinthifolia leaf lectin (SteLL)Chitin, Oligosaccharide chains Broth microdilution C. albicansMIC: 6.5 µg/mL (24 h)
MFC: 26 µg/mL (24 h)		Fungistatic
Fungicidal		[51]
Water-soluble Moringa oleifera seed lectin (WSMoL)Chitin, N-acetyl-glucosamine, Glucose,
Fructose		Broth microdilution C. albicans URM 5901MIC: 20 µg/mL (48 h)
MFC: 80 µg/mL (48 h)		Fungistatic
Fungicidal
Necrosis
Apoptosis
Disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential		[52]
C. parapsilosis URM 6345MIC: 20 µg/mL (48 h)
MFC: 80 µg/mL (48 h)
C. krusei URM 6391MIC: 20 µg/mL (48 h)
MFC: 40 µg/mL (48 h)
N. glabratus URM 4246MIC: 20 µg/mL (48 h)
MFC: 20 µg/mL (48 h)
MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration—the breakpoint (the growth inhibition percentage) for determining the MIC is variable and should be consulted in the original articles. MFC: minimal fungicidal concentration. IC50: concentration that inhibits growth by 50%. ATCC: American Type Culture Collection. CDC: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CLSI: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. FAMED-FURG: Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande. MTCC: Microbial Type Culture Collection. NGY: Neopeptone Glucose Yeast. NCCPF: National Culture Collection of Pathogenic Fungi. URM: University Recife Mycologia. N.I., not informed in the literature. a To convert the MIC/MFC values of DvL, MaL, and Mo-CBP2 to µg/mL, the native molecular weights of these proteins are 25, 47, and 66 kDa, respectively.
Table 2. Representative lectins with activity against Cryptococcus spp.: carbohydrate specificity, experimental data, and observed effects.
Table 2. Representative lectins with activity against Cryptococcus spp.: carbohydrate specificity, experimental data, and observed effects.
LectinBinding CarbohydratesProtocolTarget FungiEndpoint
(Incubation Time)		EffectsReference
Coagulant Moringa oleifera seed lectin (cMoL)Galactose, Glucose, Raffinose, Lactose, Arabinose, Trehalose, Oligosaccharide chainsBroth microdilutionC. neoformans B3501MIC: 7.5 μg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic
Apoptosis
Necrosis		[57]
C. neoformans H99MIC: 7.5 μg/mL (48 h)
C. gattii R265MIC: 7.5 μg/mL (48 h)
Myracrodruon urundeuva heartwood lectin (MuHL)Chitin, N-acetyl-glucosamine, Oligosaccharide chains Broth microdilutionC. neoformans B3501MIC: 6.25 µg/mL (48 h)
MFC: 12.5 µg/mL (48 h)		Fungistatic
Fungicidal		[58]
C. gattii R265MIC: 12.5 µg/mL (48 h)
MFC: 25 µg/mL (48 h)
PgTeLChitin, Oligosaccharide chainsBroth microdilutionC. neoformans B3501MIC: 172 µg/mL (24 h)Fungistatic[59]
ScytovirinTetramannose
Broth microdilution (CLSI M27-A2)C. neoformans serotype A (various strains)MFC: 0.5–20 µM (48 h)Fungicidal
Decreased capsule size		[60]
C. neoformans serotype D (various strains)MFC: 20 µM (48 h)
C. gattii R265MFC: 10 µM (48 h)
C. gattii R272MFC: 0.5 µM (48 h)
WSMoLChitin, N-acetyl-glucosamine, Glucose,
Fructose		Broth microdilution C. neoformans B3501MIC: 6.25 μg/mL (48 h)Fungistatic
Lysosomal damage
Reduced mitochondrial membrane potential		[61]
C. neoformans H99MIC: 6.25 μg/mL (48 h)
C. gattii R265MIC: 6.25 μg/mL (48 h)
MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration; the breakpoint (the growth inhibition percentage) for determining the MIC is variable and should be consulted in the original articles. MFC: minimal fungicidal concentration.
Table 3. Lectin-antifungal drug interactions against yeast species.
Table 3. Lectin-antifungal drug interactions against yeast species.
LectinDrugMethodTarget FungiSynergy MetricEffectReference
ApuLFluconazoleCheckerboardC. albicans URM 5901FICI = 1.0Additive[34]
C. parapsilosis URM 6345FICI = 0.12Synergism
cMoLFluconazoleCheckerboardC. neoformans B3501FICI = 2.01Antagonism[57]
C. neoformans H99FICI = 0.26Synergism
C. gattii R265FICI = 108.67Antagonism
ConAFluconazoleCheckerboardC. albicans ATCC 10231Reduced antifungal MICAdditive [37]
ConMFluconazoleCheckerboardC. albicans ATCC 10231Reduced antifungal MICAdditive[37]
HeljaFluconazoleCheckerboardC. albicans NGY152FICI = 0.75Synergism[41]
MvFLFluconazoleCheckerboardC. albicans URM-5901FICI > 2.0Antagonism[44]
C. krusei URM-6391FICI = 1.0Additive
C. parapsilosis URM-6951FICI = 0.14Synergism
C. tropicalis URM-6551FICI = 1.0Additive
N. glabratus URM-4246FICI > 2.0Antagonism
PgTeLAmphotericin BCheckerboardC. neoformans B3501FICI = 2.0Indifferent[59]
ScytovirinAmphotericin BCheckerboardC. neoformans serotype D 24067FICI = 0.3Synergism[60]
FluconazoleFICI = 0.75Synergism
5-flucytosineFICI = 0.56Synergism
FICI: Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ferreira, G.R.S.; Lira, T.L.d.S.; Napoleão, T.H. Targeting Yeast Pathogens with Lectins: A Narrative Review from Mechanistic Insights to the Need for Addressing Translational Challenges. Biomedicines 2026, 14, 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010105

AMA Style

Ferreira GRS, Lira TLdS, Napoleão TH. Targeting Yeast Pathogens with Lectins: A Narrative Review from Mechanistic Insights to the Need for Addressing Translational Challenges. Biomedicines. 2026; 14(1):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010105

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ferreira, Gustavo Ramos Salles, Thiago Lucas da Silva Lira, and Thiago Henrique Napoleão. 2026. "Targeting Yeast Pathogens with Lectins: A Narrative Review from Mechanistic Insights to the Need for Addressing Translational Challenges" Biomedicines 14, no. 1: 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010105

APA Style

Ferreira, G. R. S., Lira, T. L. d. S., & Napoleão, T. H. (2026). Targeting Yeast Pathogens with Lectins: A Narrative Review from Mechanistic Insights to the Need for Addressing Translational Challenges. Biomedicines, 14(1), 105. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines14010105

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop