Next Article in Journal
Effect of CBC-Derived Inflammatory Indicators in Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease Risk in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients
Previous Article in Journal
WNT Signaling Factors as Potential Synovial Inflammation Moderators in Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Label-Free Electrochemical Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Assay of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine

by
Veronica V. Pronina
1,
Lyubov V. Kostryukova
1,
Sergey V. Ivanov
1,
Elena G. Tichonova
1,
Alexander I. Archakov
1 and
Victoria V. Shumyantseva
1,2,*
1
Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Pogodinskaya Street, 10, Moscow 119121, Russia
2
Faculty of Biomedicine, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow 117997, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(4), 996; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040996
Submission received: 19 March 2025 / Revised: 17 April 2025 / Accepted: 18 April 2025 / Published: 20 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)

Abstract

:
Background/Objectives: Our study brings a new method to properly evaluating drug efficacy at the non-invasive in vitro level. Methods: In this work, the electrochemical mediator-free and reagent-free analysis of cell lines based on the registration of electrochemical profiles of membrane proteins was developed. We studied the specificity of cell lines Wi-38 and HepG2 and the toxic effects of drugs on cell-on-electrode systems. Results: A linear dependence of the peak current on the concentration of cells applied to the electrode in the range from 1 × 105 to 6 × 105 cells/electrode was registered (R2 0.932 for Wi-38 and R2 0.912 for HepG2). The water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) nanoparticles recommended for atherosclerosis treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases did not show a toxic effect on the human fibroblast cells, Wi-38, or the human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, HepG2, at sufficiently high concentrations (such as 0.1–1 mg/mL). The antitumor drug doxorubicin, at concentrations of 3 and 10 μg/mL, showed a pronounced toxic effect on the tested cell lines, where the percentage of living cells was 50–55%. Conclusions: A comparative analysis of the cytotoxicity of wPC (0.1–1 mg/mL) and doxorubicin (3–10 μg/mL) on the cell lines Wi-38 and HepG2 using the MTT test and electrochemical approach for the registration of cells showed their clear adequacy.

1. Introduction

Aging processes and increasing the active human lifespan are among the main tasks of gerontology and humanity as a whole [1,2,3]. Every year, a large number of people die from various diseases (cardiovascular, oncological, neurodegenerative, etc.) all over the world [4]. It is believed that the occurrence of various diseases and their aggressive development occurs during the aging process. The aging process can be associated with many signs, such as genomic instability, loss of proteostasis, disruption of nutrient perception systems, mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular aging, decreased self-renewal capacity [5], and an increase in cardiovascular diseases associated with the manifestation of atherosclerosis [6,7,8,9].
Liver cells have a high regenerative capacity. However, during the aging process, after damage the cells activate compensatory mechanisms, which, when hyperstimulated, can lead to a decrease in regenerative capacity and the development of pathologies [5]. Cellular aging is one of the causes of aging, in which an irreversible stop of the cell cycle of proliferating cells occurs. In liver fibrosis, aging stellate cells were found, in which there is a decrease in collagen production and proliferation. The occurrence of fibrosis can be a consequence of chronic liver diseases of various etiologies (toxic damage; viral infections; and autoimmune, metabolic, and genetic disorders) [10,11]. To reduce the risk of fibrosis and increase lifespan, timely treatment of concomitant diseases, including liver diseases, is necessary.
Phospholipids are key elements in mammalian cells. For example, phosphatidylcholine (PC) is the main component of cell membranes and subcellular organelles [12]. The similarity of plant phospholipids to phospholipids of mammalian cell membranes allows them to be included in these structures for the prevention of a number of pathological processes [13,14]. When taking phospholipids of plant origin (for example, soy phospholipids), a decrease in lipid levels is observed, the level of cholesterol and triglycerides in the blood is controlled, membrane function is stabilized, and liver health is supported [13]. When developing drugs, one of the important criteria for their release on the pharmaceutical market is their biocompatibility, biosafety, and low toxicity [15]. The pharmacological properties of drugs are studied on various models, such as enzymes, DNA, antibodies, and cells [12,13,14] in in vivo and in vitro systems using modern physicochemical and biochemical methods [16,17,18,19]. One of the developing areas in drug research is their electrochemical analysis [20,21]. Due to their high accuracy, sensitivity, low cost, rapidity, flexibility of analysis, and non-invasive format, electrochemical methods have shown promise for their use in in vitro experiments on various biological objects, including cell lines [22,23,24]. The use of electrochemical biosensors allows one to identify chemical compounds as potential drugs and investigate the biological mechanism of drugs [23,24]. Electrochemical sensors allow the registration of trace amounts of analyzed compounds with non-destructive and in situ detection approaches [25,26,27]. Earlier, we studied electrochemical DNA biosensors and cytochromes, P450-biosensors, and interactions of these sensor systems with drugs [28,29,30,31]. Cell-based biosensors are promising models for the investigation of drug toxicity.
In electrochemical studies, prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells are used as sensitive elements for both the detection and registration of the cells themselves and for the assessment of the influence and impact of various toxic compounds or medicinal preparations on cells by measuring the transformation of the electrochemical response of the bio object [32]. The aim of our work was to study the influence of the water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) nanoparticles on normal human fibroblast cells, Wi-38, and on liver cells of human hepatocellular carcinoma, HepG2. The novelty of our investigation lies in the in situ/process monitoring of drug intervention on cell lines using electrochemical monitoring. The developed electrochemical assay showed cell-surface proteins’ profiles and the dose-dependencies of wPC on these cell lines.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

In experiments, we used the water-soluble pharmaceutical form of PL nanoparticles as ultra-small phospholipid micelles from soybean phosphatidylcholine, with an average size of 30 nm (wPC), which contained 0.5 g of phosphatidylcholine and 2 g of D-maltose [33,34,35] as a stock solution in 100 mL of 0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.4, containing 0.05 M NaCl (PBS). A water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) is a lyophilized powder that produces an ultrafine emulsion upon rehydration. Maltose monohydrate from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a control, acting as a cryoprotective agent to preserve the properties of NPs after lyophilic drying during rehydration. The cytostatic doxorubicin hydrochloride (g/h) (JSC Omutninskaya Scientific Pilot-Industrial Base, Omutninskaya, Russia) was chosen as a well-known cytotoxic agent [16].
The following reagents were used: single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs; diameter 1.6 ± 0.4 nm, length > 5 µM, surface area 1000 m2/g), TUBALL™ BATT H2O, with water dispersion of 0.4%, stabilized by carboxymethylcellulose, were obtained from OCSIAL Ltd. (https://ocsial.com, accessed on 17 January 2025, Novosibirsk, Russia); potassium phosphate monobasic (≥99%) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Sodium chloride (99.5%) was purchased from Acros Organics (Carlsbad, CA, USA). All aqueous solutions were prepared using Milli-Q water (18.2 MΩcm) purified with a Milli-Q water purification system by Millipore.
Electrochemical experiments were performed in a supporting electrolyte 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer with 50 mM NaCl (PBS, pH 7.4).

2.2. Cell Lines

In the current study, cell lines of human fibroblasts, Wi-38, and human hepatocellular carcinoma of the liver, HepG2, obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and stored in the IBMC cell culture collection, were used.
The cells were incubated in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) (PanEco, Moscow, Russia) with 2 mM L-glutamine and 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) (Capricorne, Ebsdorfergrund, Germany) added, in 25 cm2 and 75 cm2 culture flasks (Biologyx, Jinan, Shandong, China) at 37 °C, in a humid atmosphere with 5% CO2 (CO2 incubator, Sanyo, Moriguchi, Osaka, Japan). Versene solution and a 0.25% trypsin solution were used during the passage to detach the cells, adding them to the flask for 2–3 min. The cells were used after 3–18 passages and freezing.

2.3. Study of Cytotoxicity of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine (wPC) by MTT Test In Vitro

The cytotoxicity of the water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) was assessed in vitro using the MTT test. Wi-38 and HepG2 cells (105 cells per well) were seeded in sterile 96-well culture plates (Biologyx, Jinan, Shandong, China) and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 using a CO2 incubator (Sanyo) for 24–26 h. Then, the test samples were added at wPC concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 0.1 mg/mL. Maltose, a component of the water-soluble form, was used as a control and added at concentrations of 4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL. The cells with the test substances were incubated for 24 h. After that, 50 μL of MTT reagent (1 mg/mL) (Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India) was added and incubated at 37 °C for 3 h, after which they were removed, and 100 μL of DMSO (PanEco, Moscow, Russia) was added. The cells were covered with foil and shaken on an orbital shaker for 15 min. Absorbance was recorded at 570 nm using a Multiscan FC (ThermoSpectronic, Waltham, MA, USA) and normalized to the untreated control (no substances).

2.4. Electrochemical Study of wPC Influence on Cell Lines

Electrochemical measurements were carried out using Autolab 302N potentiostat/galvanostat (Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, The Netherlands) equipped with the NOVA software (version 2.0). Commercially available screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) were obtained from ColorElectronics, Moscow, Russia (http://www.colorel.ru, accessed on 17 January 2025). The SPEs contained graphite working electrodes (geometric area 0.0314 cm2), auxiliary electrodes, and silver/silver chloride reference electrodes (Ag/AgCl). All potentials were referred to the Ag/AgCl reference electrode. Then, 2 μL of diluted SWCNT TUBALL™ BATT H2O dispersion (0.75 ± 0.05 mg/mL) was applied to the surface of the electrodes. Electrodes SPE/CNT stayed at room temperature until completely dried [28,29].
Wi-38 and HepG2 cells were inoculated (5 × 105 cells per well) into 12-well plates (Biologyx) and cultured at 37 °C in an atmosphere with a relative humidity of 95% and 5% CO2 for 24 h. Cells were incubated with wPC (1 mg/mL, 0.1 mg/mL), maltose monohydrate (4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL) or doxorubicin (3 µg/mL, 10 µg/mL) 24 h, at 37 °C in the CO2 incubator. After the incubation, the medium with the introduced samples was removed. The cells were washed three times with Versene solution and detached as described above. The cell suspension was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; PanEco) and precipitated in an Elme (Riga, Latvia) centrifuge at 1000× g for 4 min, followed by removal of the supernatant. The cell pellets were resuspended with potassium phosphate buffer to equal cell concentrations in µL. Cell counting was performed using the ViCell XR analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA).
The square wave voltammetry (SWV) was recorded for the registration of cells and cells treated with water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC), maltose, or doxorubicin. The following optimized SWV parameters were used: 0.0 to +1.0 V, step 5 mV, modulation amplitude 0.02 V, and frequency 10 Hz. For electrochemical measurements, 2 μL of the test solution was applied onto the surface of the modified electrode and incubated at room temperature for 25 min. A horizontal measurement regimen was used for all electrochemical experiments under aerobic conditions at room temperature. A 60 µL drop of PBS was placed onto the SPEs to cover the surface of all three electrodes. Incubation was carried out on the electrode in a drop of 60 µL for 5 min before the start of the experiment. To assess the reproducibility of the results for each concentration, at least 3 electrodes were used, and the standard deviation was calculated.
The cytotoxicity of the samples obtained by the electrochemical method was calculated using the following formula [27,36]:
C y t o t o x i t y ( %   ) = ( I ( c e l l s d r u g )   / I ( c e l l s ) ) × 100 %
where cytotoxicity, (%)—electrochemical coefficient of cytotoxic effect, I(cells – drug)—peak current of cell after interaction with compound, I(cells)—peak current of cell before interaction with compound (used as control).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Student’s test was used to assess the significance of differences in the electrochemically measured parameters over three measurements. Differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05. In the figures, the data are presented as the mean value ± standard error relative to the mean value.

3. Results

Aging is a complicated biological process, which reflects a systemic response to a gradual accumulation of cellular and tissue damage and dysregulation of defense systems [2,37,38]. The use of drugs and geroprotectors involves assessing their toxic effects on both the liver and the body as a whole. Nanoparticles (NPs) of various chemical natures and compositions are currently widely used in drug delivery, diagnostics, cosmetology, gerontology, and a number of other areas [37]. Because of the fact that a large number of drugs are being developed based on nanoparticles, and many studies are currently being conducted in this area, the question of the safety of using NPs in drug development arises. Thus, it is important to assess the safety of such drugs and the biocompatibility of the NPs used [38]. Due to their size, nanoparticles are able to overcome various biological barriers inside the body, in particular the blood–brain barrier. In addition, the nanosize of the particles in the drug provides its access to the cell and its various compartments, including the nucleus [39]. Interactions with cells and the toxicity of NPs largely depend on their composition.
To assess the toxicity of the water-soluble pharmaceutical form of PL nanoparticles as ultra-small phospholipid micelles from soybean phosphatidylcholine with an average size of 30 nm (wPC) in in vitro studies, the normal human fibroblast line Wi-38 and the human hepatocellular carcinoma tumor line HepG2 were selected as model cell lines. We used these cell lines as liver-on-electrode models for the assessment of the concentration-dependent toxic effect of wPC and doxorubicin by means of a standard method (MTT test) and electrochemical analysis of the Wi-38 and HepG2 cell lines, which differ significantly in morphology and size.
In our investigation, we used two methods for comparing the toxicity assessment of the water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine: (i) 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay (MTT test) and (ii) electrochemical bioassay based on monitoring the response of cell lines to interaction with the drug doxorubicin or wPC.

3.1. Cytotoxicity of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine wPC by MTT Test

The water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine wPC is a powder that forms an ultrafine emulsion with a particle size of less than 30–50 nm upon rehydration [34]. The studied water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine, cryoprotective agent (maltose), and doxorubicin (cytotoxic agent) were incubated with cells and analyzed using the MTT test (Figure 1).
A study of the cytotoxic effect of the water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) by the MTT test after 24 h of incubation with normal human fibroblast cells Wi-38 (Figure 1a) showed a slight decrease in the percentage of viable cells at a concentration of 1 mg/mL wPC (79.13 ± 2.60% cell viability), while incubation of Wi-38 cells with wPC at a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL wPC showed almost complete cell survival (93.34 ± 2.2% cell viability). A study of the cytotoxicity of the control substance, which is the cryoprotector component of wPC, maltose (4-O-α-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucose), demonstrated the absence of pronounced toxic manifestations on Wi-38 cells when incubated with similar concentrations in wPC (4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL by maltose). In contrast, a study of the cytotoxicity of a well-known toxic agent, the antitumor drug doxorubicin hydrochloride, at concentrations of 3 and 10 μg/mL showed a pronounced toxic effect on cells, where the percentage of living cells was 50–55%. This study confirms the non-selectivity of the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin as an anticancer drug, leading to the adverse side effects on cells and other biocomponents, including DNA, as we have shown earlier [40,41].
The cytotoxicity of wPC after 24 h of incubation with the human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (HepG2) also showed an insignificant decrease in the percentage of viable cells at a concentration of 1 mg/mL wPC (81.0 ± 2.85% cell viability) (Figure 1b). At a concentration of 0.1 mg/mL wPC, cell viability was almost 100%. It was also shown that incubation of HepG2 cells with the cryoprotective agent maltose did not lead to a significant decrease in viable cells at the studied concentrations of 4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL. A study of the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin on this cell line showed almost 50% death of tumor cells, while no significant difference was observed between the studied concentrations (3 μg/mL and 10 μg/mL). Thus, MTT cytotoxicity studies of wPC as nanoparticles exhibited no significant effect on cell viability in the selected cell lines as the in vitro model.

3.2. Electrochemical Analysis of Cytotoxicity of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine (wPC)

The development of new drugs and different dosage forms demands new analytical techniques for toxicological evaluation. Cell-on-electrode assay as an in vitro cell model possesses obvious advantages, such as the 3Rs principles (Reduction in analysis duration, Replacement of chip, and Refinement of effect) [42,43].
The application of electrochemical biosensors with cells, enzymes, virus particles, or DNA immobilized on the electrode allows for detecting these biological objects with high sensitivity [44,45]. In recent years, there has been growing interest in the development of electrochemical biosensors for the analysis of cell lines (cell-based biosensors) [46,47]. Electrochemical methods are promising for assessing the cytotoxicity of drugs due to the high sensitivity of the analysis and the ability to select a rational modification to an appropriate cell line. Applying electrochemical methods allows registering changes in the electrochemical parameters of living systems (cells) before and after exposure to drugs due to the ability of biological molecules to electro-oxidize/reduce on the electrode [29,36,48,49,50]. A number of studies have used cell-based biosensors to assess the toxicity of various compounds [36,47].
In this study, the analysis of the cell lines Wi-38 and HepG2 was carried out using the square-wave voltammetry (SWV) method. Screen-printed graphite electrodes (SPEs) were modified with single-wall carbon nanotubes (SPEs/CNTs). Modification of electrodes with carbon nanomaterials leads to increased sensitivity and improved analytical characteristics of sensor elements [51,52]. Detection limits for cell registration were found depending on the cell line.
The linear dependence for Wi-38 or HepG2 and peak current was in the range from 1 × 105 to 6 × 105 cells/electrode (Figure 2c,d). The nature of the electrochemical signal of cell lines may reflect the processes of electrochemical oxidation of outer membrane proteins of cell lines [36].
The square-wave voltammograms of Wi-38 human fibroblast cells in an electrolyte buffer corresponding to physiological media (0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer with 50 mM NaCl, pH 7.4) in the potential range (0–(+)1) V revealed one intensive and clear peak at E = +(0.546 ± 0.018) V (Figure 2a). HepG2 cells (Figure 2b) were also well detected in the range of 5 × 104–5 × 105 cells/electrode at a potential of E = +0.577 ± 0.013 V. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) were calculated from the calibration curves as kSD/b (k = 3 for LOD, k = 10 for LOQ), b = slope of the calibration curve, SD = standard deviation [53,54]. As a result, it was shown that for Wi-38 cells, LOD and LOQ were 53,809 cells/electrode and 179,365 cells/electrode, respectively. For HepG2, these parameters were 89,150 cells/electrode and 270,152 cells/electrode, respectively. However, it should be noted that when applying the HepG2 cell suspension to the electrode in higher concentrations, problems arose due to its more viscous state, which is possibly associated with the morphology of the cells.

3.3. Electrochemical Analysis of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine (wPC) and Doxorubicin on Cells

The effect of the water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) was studied after incubation with cells for 24 h at 1 mg/mL and 0.1 mg/mL concentrations of wPC. The cryoprotector maltose monohydrate, which is part of wPC, was analyzed at the corresponding concentrations (4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL). Doxorubicin hydrochloride was used as a well-known cytotoxic agent.
The square-wave voltammograms of wPC did not display any signals in the range of potentials for cell lines (Figure 3).
Evaluation of the effect of the cytotoxic drug doxorubicin on the cell lines Wi-38 and HepG2 showed a decrease in the intensity of the peak current depending on the concentrations 3 μg/mL and 10 μg/mL (Figure 4a–c). Our experiments confirmed the toxic effect of doxorubicin not only on the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2, but also on human fibroblast Wi-38 cells (Figure 4a). The influence of doxorubicin on the HepG2 cell line at the concentrations of 3 μg/mL and 10 μg/mL confirms the pronounced antitumor effect of this drug on human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (a decrease in peak current 1.56 and 2.76 times, respectively) (Figure 4b,c).
The water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) at concentrations of 0.1 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL did not significantly influence the electrochemical signals of Wi-38 cells (Figure 5a and Figure 6a) in comparison with untreated control cells. It was also shown that the cryoprotector agent maltose also did not noticeably change the peak current intensity of the Wi-38 cell lines.
On the human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cell line (Figure 5b and Figure 6b), a slight decrease in the peak current intensity was observed during incubation with wPC in comparison with untreated cells (control). A similar result was observed during incubation of cells with a cryoprotectant maltose. Based on the obtained results, the cytotoxicity of the studied samples was calculated using two methods, MTT and square-wave voltammetry (Table 1).
The results of the study of the cytotoxicity of wPC, maltose, and doxorubicin on the cell lines Wi-38 and HepG2 obtained by two methods, using the MTT test and electrochemical bioassay, based on registration of the cell-surface proteins showed their clear adequacy and similarity of the results obtained (Table 1, Figure 7).

4. Discussion

The problem of slowing down aging and the search for ways and opportunities to prolong lifespan are receiving great attention in the world. Pharmacological interventions that can increase life expectancy are of growing interest in this issue [55]. In this regard, great consideration in the world is being paid to the concept of geroprotectors aimed at biological aging to prevent many recurrent diseases [56].
The use of ultra-small plant phospholipids can reduce the level of non-HDL-C (non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol), triglycerides (TG), apolipoprotein B, total protein, and very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, which allows them to be used in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia [13,35]. In addition, the use of phospholipid-based drugs can reduce the risk of age-related diseases and play an important role in protecting from liver failure [57,58,59]. One of the criteria for increasing lifespan is the use of drugs that do not cause toxic effects or the selection of doses of drugs that do not have negative effects and unwanted side effects on the body [60,61].
Previously, it was shown that water-soluble ultra-small phospholipid nanoparticles-micelles are safe and effective for 12 weeks of oral administration for combined hyperlipidemia treatment. Phospholipid nanoparticles result in a significant decrease from baseline levels of non-HDL-C and TG [35]. It is known that in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) and acute coronary syndrome, the phosphatidylcholine/phosphatidylethanolamine (PC/PE) ratio in HDL is less than that in stable IHD patients. It is expected that the phospholipidation by phosphatidylcholine of these patients may stabilize the atherosclerotic plaques and prevent them from disruption followed by future thrombosis and myocardial infarction [60].
In several studies, a change in the molar ratio between PC and PE was established as a key determinant of liver health. Changes in the hepatic PC/PE ratio have been linked to the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) as well as liver failure, impaired liver regeneration, and the severity of alcoholic fatty liver disease in humans [12]. Thus, oral long-term use of phospholipid nanoparticles may contribute to a protective effect against severe adverse cardiovascular complications and liver diseases and provide longevity for these patients.
Various classical analytical methods are used to analyze the toxicity of medicinal agents [61]. In recent years, more attention has been paid to alternative methods for studying drug toxicity, for example, using electrochemical biosensors. Cell-based biosensors are a hot topic in modern biosensor research. Thus, using a smartphone-based electrochemical sensor on HepG2 cells, the toxicity of heavy metal ions (Cd2+, Pb2+, Hg2+) was assessed [47]. Using various electrochemical sensors, toxicity analysis was carried out for tri(2-butylxyethyl) phosphate (TBEP), tributyl phosphate (TnBP), triphenyl phosphate (TPhP), tri(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP), tri(2-chloropropyl) phosphate (TCPP), tri(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP), acrylamide, and other compounds [23,61,62]. HepG2 liver cancer cells were analyzed by means of immunosensors based on the anti-CD133 antibody with the range of 1 × 105 to 3 × 106 cells/mL [63,64]. In our experiments, analysis of HepG2 and Wi-38 cell lines by square-wave voltammetry showed a linear dependence of the peak current intensity at the potential of E = +0.5 ÷ 0.6 V on cell concentration. The study of the water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) on HepG2 and Wi-38 cell lines at sufficiently high concentrations (1 mg/mL) showed an insignificant decrease in the peak current intensities of living cells after 24 h of incubation with the substance, which is consistent with the results obtained by the classical MTT assay. At the same time, the cryoprotector maltose as a component of wPC did not significantly affect cell survival. The electrochemical cyto-biosensor based on the direct reagent-free analysis of cells allows for an accurate assessment of the effect of drugs on cells’ viability.

5. Conclusions

Electrochemical mediator-free and reagent-free analysis of cell lines based on the registration of electrochemical profiles of membrane cell-surface proteins is an effective approach for studying both the specificity of cells and the toxic effects of drugs on cell-on-electrode systems. In this work, we presented a cyto-biosensor for two types of cells, Wi-38 and HepG2, in the concentration range from 1 × 105 to 6 × 105 cells/electrode. The studied water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine, which previously demonstrated the effect of reducing the level of low-density cholesterol and hepatoprotective properties, also did not show a toxic effect on either normal human fibroblast cells (Wi-38) or human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) at sufficiently high concentrations. In addition, a comparative analysis of the effect of the toxic agent doxorubicin and wPC on their toxic manifestations on cells was carried out. As a result, it was shown that doxorubicin (at 3–10 μg/mL concentration) causes a decrease in peak current intensity by almost 2 times compared with untreated cells. Treatment with wPC resulted in a decreased intensity of peak current of cell lines by 1.2 times at high concentrations (0.1–1 mg/mL). Thus, it is worth saying that electrochemical bioassay can be used both for monitoring cell growth and the effect of the environment on the growth rate and for assessing cell survival under the influence of various substances and in the search for new medications, in particular, cytostatics. The suggested non-invasive strategy for electrochemical analysis of mammalian cells could potentially be used for developing new therapeutics and comparative analysis of drugs under study.
The electrochemical detection of cells for drug toxicity analysis holds significant practical value and demonstrates considerable potential for rapid detection applications. Future perspectives of cell-based mediator-free and reagent-free biosensors may be described as investigation of the broad spectrum of eukaryotic cells for the analysis of specificity of registration and evaluation of toxic effects of exogenous substances. The limitation of our approach deals with the sensitivities of the electrodes for the registration of different types of cells. However, appropriate modification of the working surface of the electrode can improve this parameter of electrochemical analysis. Our results demonstrated two main points. The first one is that different drugs possess different effects, toxic or nontoxic, on cells, registered by means of the MTT test or electroanalytical method. The second one is that the water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC) nanoparticles, recommended for atherosclerosis treatment and prevention of cardiovascular diseases [35], did not show a toxic effect on human fibroblast cells, Wi-38, or human hepatocellular carcinoma cells, HepG2, at sufficiently high concentrations (such as 0.1–1 mg/mL). Based on these data, wPC can be classified as a safe drug.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, V.V.S. and A.I.A.; methodology, V.V.S. and A.I.A.; software, V.V.P. and L.V.K.; validation, V.V.P. and L.V.K.; formal analysis, V.V.S., V.V.P., and L.V.K.; investigation, V.V.P. and L.V.K.; resources, V.V.S., E.G.T., and A.I.A.; data curation, S.V.I. and V.V.S.; writing—original draft preparation, L.V.K., V.V.P., and V.V.S.; writing—review and editing, L.V.K., S.V.I., E.G.T., and V.V.S.; visualization, V.V.P. and L.V.K.; supervision, V.V.S., E.G.T., and A.I.A.; project administration, V.V.S.; funding acquisition, A.I.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financed by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation within the framework of the project No. 075-15-2024-643.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Popovich, I.G.; Anisimov, V.N. Geroprotectors and carcinogenesis. Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2004, 3, 61–69. [Google Scholar]
  2. Moskalev, A.; Guvatova, Z.; Lopes, I.A.; Beckett, C.W.; Kennedy, B.K.; De Magalhaes, J.P.; Makarov, A.A. Targeting aging mechanisms: Pharmacological perspectives. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 2022, 33, 266–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moqri, M.; Herzog, C.; Poganik, J.R.; Biomarkers of Aging Consortium; Justice, J.; Belsky, D.W.; Higgins-Chen, A.; Moskalev, A.; Fuellen, G.; Cohen, A.A.; et al. Biomarkers of aging for the identification and evaluation of longevity interventions. Cell 2023, 186, 3758–3775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Anisimov, V.N. Life span extension and cancer risk: Myths and reality. Exp. Gerontol. 2001, 36, 1101–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pozzo, L.D.; Xu, Z.; Lin, S.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Enechojo, O.S.; Abankwah, J.K.; Peng, Y.; Chu, X.; Zhou, H.; et al. Role of epigenetics in the regulation of skin aging and geroprotective intervention: A new sight. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 174, 116592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bea, A.M.; González-Guerrero, A.; Cenarro, A.; Lamiquiz-Moneo, I.; Climent, E.; Jarauta, E.; Gracia-Rubio, I.; Benaiges, D.; Laclaustra, M.; Tejedor, T.; et al. Association of HDL cholesterol with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in primary hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 2025, 400, 118617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morvaridzadeh, M.; Zoubdane, N.; Heshmati, J.; Alami, M.; Berrougui, H.; Khalil, A. High-Density Lipoprotein Metabolism and Function in Cardiovascular Diseases: What about Aging and Diet Effects? Nutrients 2024, 16, 653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pietri, P.; Stefanadis, C. Cardiovascular Aging and Longevity: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2021, 77, 189–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pinto, C.; Ninfole, E.; Gaggiano, L.; Benedetti, A.; Marzioni, M.; Maroni, L. Aging and the Biological Response to Liver Injury. Semin. Liver Dis. 2019, 40, 225–232. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, M.; Serna-Salas, S.; Damba, T.; Borghesan, M.; Demaria, M.; Moshage, H. Hepatic stellate cell senescence in liver fibrosis: Characteristics, mechanisms and perspectives. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2021, 199, 111572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yao, J.; Li, Y.; Wang, H. The Roles of Myeloid Cells in Aging-related Liver Diseases. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2023, 19, 1564–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. van der Veen, J.N.; Kennelly, J.P.; Wan, S.; Vance, J.E.; Vance, D.E.; Jacobs, R.L. The critical role of phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine metabolism in health and disease. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2017, 1859, 1558–1572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ipatova, O.M.; Prozorovskaia, N.N.; Torkhovskaia, T.I.; Baranova, V.S.; Guseva, D.A. Biological effects of the soybean phospholipids. Biomed. Khim. 2004, 50, 436–450. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Medvedeva, N.V.; Prosorovskiy, V.N.; Ignatov, D.V.; Druzilovskaya, O.S.; Kudinov, V.A.; Kasatkina, E.O.; Tikhonova, E.G.; Ipatova, O.M. Pharmacological agents and transport nanosystems based on plant phospholipids. Biomed. Khim. 2015, 61, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Davis, S.E.; Zabotka, L.; Desai, R.J.; Wang, S.V.; Maro, J.C.; Coughlin, K.; Hernández-Muñoz, J.J.; Stojanovic, D.; Shah, N.H.; Smith, J.C. Use of Electronic Health Record Data for Drug Safety Signal Identification: A Scoping Review. Drug Saf. 2023, 46, 725–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kim, H.S.; Wainer, I.W. Simultaneous analysis of liposomal doxorubicin and doxorubicin using capillary electrophoresis and laser induced fluorescence. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2010, 52, 372–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Qi, P.; Li, P.; Qiao, L.; Xue, H.; Ma, Y.; Wei, S.; Yang, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Simultaneous quantification of pirarubicin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and vincristine in human plasma of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by LC-MS/MS method. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2023, 1224, 123754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Watanabe, A.; Murayama, S.; Karasawa, K.; Yamamoto, E.; Morikawa, S.; Takita, R.; Murata, S.; Kato, M. A Simple and Easy Method of Monitoring Doxorubicin Release from a Liposomal Drug Formulation in the Serum Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2019, 67, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rus, I.; Tertiș, M.; Barbălată, C.; Porfire, A.; Tomuță, I.; Săndulescu, R.; Cristea, C. An Electrochemical Strategy for the Simultaneous Detection of Doxorubicin and Simvastatin for Their Potential Use in the Treatment of Cancer. Biosensors 2021, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cetinkaya, A.; Kaya, S.I.; Ozcelikay, G.; Budak, F.; Ozkan, S.A. Carbon Nanomaterials-Based Novel Hybrid Platforms for Electrochemical Sensor Applications in Drug Analysis. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2024, 54, 1227–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lima, H.R.S.; da Silva, J.S.; de Oliveira Farias, E.A.; Teixeira, P.R.S.; Eiras, C.; Nunes, L.C.C. Electrochemical sensors and biosensors for the analysis of antineoplastic drugs. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 108, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Wu, C.; Hu, N.; Zhou, J.; Du, L.; Wang, P. Microfabricated electrochemical cell-based biosensors for analysis of living cells in vitro. Biosensors 2012, 2, 127–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wei, X.; Reddy, V.S.; Gao, S.; Zhai, X.; Li, Z.; Shi, J.; Niu, L.; Zhang, D.; Ramakrishna, S.; Zou, X. Recent advances in electrochemical cell-based biosensors for food analysis: Strategies for sensor construction. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2024, 248, 115947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kun, C.; Jinhua, C.; Manli, G.; Zhenfeng, L.; Shouzhuo, Y. Electrochemical Behavior of MCF-7 Cells on Carbon Nanotube Modified Electrode and Application in Evaluating the Effect of 5-Fluorouracil. Electroanalysis 2006, 18, 1179–1185. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim, J.; Campbell, A.S.; de Ávila, B.E.; Wang, J. Wearable biosensors for healthcare monitoring. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 389–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Chandra, P. Personalized biosensors for point-of-care diagnostics: From bench to bedside applications. Nanotheranostics 2023, 7, 210–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gupta, N.; Renugopalakrishnan, V.; Liepmann, D.; Paulmurugan, R.; Malhotra, B.D. Cell-based biosensors: Recent trends, challenges and future perspectives. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019, 141, 111435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Shumyantseva, V.V.; Bulko, T.V.; Chistov, A.A.; Kolesanova, E.F.; Agafonova, L.E. Electroanalytical characteristics of an antiviral drug favipiravir and analysis of its interaction with DNA. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kostryukova, L.V.; Serdyukova, A.S.; Pronina, V.V.; Shumyantseva, V.V.; Tereshkina, Y.A. An Electrochemical Biosensor Analysis of the Interaction of a Two-Vector Phospholipid Composition of Doxorubicin with dsDNA and Breast Cancer Cell Models In Vitro. Pharmaceutics 2024, 16, 1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Koroleva, P.I.; Bulko, T.V.; Kuzikov, A.V.; Gilep, A.A.; Romashova, Y.u.A.; Tichonova, E.G.; Kostryukova, L.V.; Archakov, A.I.; Shumyantseva, V.V. Role assessment of water-soluble pharmaceutical form of phosphatidylcholine on the catalytic activity of cytochrome P450 2C9 and 2D6. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sanz, C.G.; Diculescu, V.C. Electrochemical Protein-based Bioanalytical Devices for Drug Analysis. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2023, 23, 1448–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Javalkar, V.; Nn Sh Khosla, A.; Khosla, A.; Krishna, R.H.; Chjeelenahalii, M. Review on Biosensors: Fundamentals, Classifications, Characteristics, Simulations, and Potential Applications. ECS Trans. 2022, 107, 13005–13029. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zubareva, M.; Kudinov, V.; Malyshev, P.; Rozhkova, T.; Markin, S.; Kukharchuk, V. Usage of a new pharmacological agent of ultra-small phospholipid nanoparticles (micelles) in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia. Eur. Heart. J. 2020, 41, 3007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tikhonova, E.G.; Sanzhakov, M.A.; Tereshkina, Y.A.; Kostryukova, L.V.; Khudoklinova, Y.Y.; Orlova, N.A.; Bobrova, D.V.; Ipatova, O.M. Drug Transport System Based on Phospholipid Nanoparticles: Production Technology and Characteristics. Pharmaceutics 2022, 14, 2522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Archakov, A.; Kukharchuk, V.; Lisitsa, A.; Ponomarenko, E.; Romashova Yu Pleshakova, T.; Yarovaya, E.; Kutsenko, V.; Guseva, M.; Beregovykh, V.; Ipatova, O.; et al. Ultra-small phospholipid nanoparticles in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia: A randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Res. Pharm. Sci. (RPS) 2024, 19, 656–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wei, X.; Liu, C.; Li, Z.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W.; Shi, J.; Zhai, X.; Zhang, D.; et al. Fabrication of a label-free electrochemical cell-based biosensor for toxicity assessment of thiram. Chemosphere 2022, 307, 135960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Najahi-Missaoui, W.; Arnold, R.D.; Cummings, B.S. Safe Nanoparticles: Are We There Yet? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 22, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wolfram, J.; Zhu, M.; Yang, Y.; Shen, J.; Gentile, E.; Paolino, D.; Fresta, M.; Nie, G.; Chen, C.; Shen, H.; et al. Safety of Nanoparticles in Medicine. Curr. Drug Targets 2015, 16, 1671–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. De Jong, W.H.; Borm, P.J. Drug delivery and nanoparticles:applications and hazards. Int. J. Nanomed. 2008, 3, 133–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kciuk, M.; Gielecińska, A.; Mujwar, S.; Kołat, D.; Kałuzińska-Kołat, Ż.; Celik, I.; Kontek, R. Doxorubicin-An Agent with Multiple Mechanisms of Anticancer Activity. Cells 2023, 12, 659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tomankova, K.; Polakova, K.; Pizova, K.; Binder, S.; Havrdova, M.; Kolarova, M.; Kriegova, E.; Zapletalova, J.; Malina, L.; Horakova, J.; et al. In vitro cytotoxicity analysis of doxorubicin-loaded/superparamagnetic iron oxide colloidal nanoassemblies on MCF7 and NIH3T3 cell lines. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 949–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Husain, A.; Meenakshi, D.U.; Ahmad, A.; Shrivastava, N.; Khan, S.A. A Review on Alternative Methods to Experimental Animals in Biological Testing: Recent Advancement and Current Strategies. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 2023, 15, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Aslantürk, Ö.S. In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Cell Viability Assays: Principles, Advantages, and Disadvantages. In Genotoxicity—A Predictable Risk to Our Actual World; Larramendy, M.L., Soloneski, S., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2018; Volume 1, pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  44. Koo, K.M.; Kim, C.D.; Ju, F.N.; Kim, H.; Kim, C.H.; Kim, T.H. Recent Advances in Electrochemical Biosensors for Monitoring Animal Cell Function and Viability. Biosensors 2022, 12, 1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ramotowska, S.; Ciesielska, A.; Makowski, M. What Can Electrochemical Methods Offer in Determining DNA–Drug Interactions? Molecules 2021, 26, 3478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cui, Z.; Luan, X.; Jiang, H.; Li, Q.; Xu, G.; Sun, C.; Zheng, L.; Song, Y.; Davison, P.A.; Huang, W.E. Application of a bacterial whole cell biosensor for the rapid detection of cytotoxicity in heavy metal contaminated seawater. Chemosphere 2018, 200, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiang, D.; Sheng, K.; Gui, G.; Jiang, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, L. A novel smartphone-based electrochemical cell sensor for evaluating the toxicity of heavy metal ions Cd2+, Hg2+, and Pb2+ in rice. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2021, 413, 4277–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Li, J.; Song, J.; Bi, S.; Zhou, S.; Cui, J.; Liu, J.; Wu, D. Electrochemical estrogen screen method based on theelectrochemical behavior of MCF-7 cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 313, 238–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Shashaani, H.; Akbari, N.; Faramarzpour, M.; Parizi, M.S.; Vanaei, S.; Khayamian, M.A.; Abdolahad, M. Cyclic voltammetric biosensing of cellular ionic secretion based on silicon nanowires to detect the effect of paclitaxel on breast normal and cancer cells. Microelectron. Eng. 2021, 239–240, 111512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, J.; Lin, R.; Wang, Q.; Gao, G.; Cui, J.; Liu, J.; Wu, D. Two-signal electrochemical method for evaluation suppression and proliferation of MCF-7 cells based on intracellular purine. Anal. Biochem. 2014, 456, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Alim, S.; Vejayan, J.; Yusoff, M.M.; Kafi, A.K.M. Recent uses of carbon nanotubes & gold nanoparticles in electrochemistry with application in biosensing: A review. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018, 121, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
  52. Admasu, T.D.; Chaithanya Batchu, K.; Barardo, D.; Ng, L.F.; Lam, V.Y.M.; Xiao, L.; Cazenave-Gassiot, A.; Wenk, M.R.; Tolwinski, N.S.; Gruber, J. Drug Synergy Slows Aging and Improves Healthspan through IGF and SREBP Lipid Signaling. Dev. Cell 2018, 47, 67–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Bahri, M.; Shi, B.; Elaguech, M.A.; Djebbi, K.; Zhou, D.; Liang, L.; Tlili Ch Wang, D. Tungsten Disulfide Nanosheet-Based Field-Effect Transistor Biosensor for DNA Hybridization Detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2022, 5, 5035–5044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bahri, M.; Fredj, Z.; Qin, P.; Sawan, M. DNA-Coupled AuNPs@CuMOF for Sensitive Electrochemical Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2024, 7, 11921–11930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tang, B.; Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Sjölander, A.; Johnell, K.; Thambisetty, M.; Ferrucci, L.; Reynolds, C.A.; Finkel, D.; Jylhävä, J.; et al. Longitudinal associations between use of antihypertensive, antidiabetic, and lipid-lowering medications and biological aging. Geroscience 2023, 45, 2065–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zeng, Q.; Gong, Y.; Zhu, N.; Shi, Y.; Zhang, C.; Qin, L. Lipids and lipid metabolism in cellular senescence: Emerging targets for age-related diseases. Ageing Res. Rev. 2024, 97, 102294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Chin, C.F.; Galam, D.; Gao, L.; Tan, B.C.; Wong, B.H.; Chua, G.L.; Loke, R.Y.; Lim, Y.C.; Wenk, M.R.; Lim, M.S.; et al. Blood-derived lysophospholipid sustains hepatic phospholipids and fat storage necessary for hepatoprotection in overnutrition. J. Clin. Investig. 2023, 133, e171267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Niu, Y.; Wei, K.; Wang, X.; Niu, B.; Zhang, L. Research progress on aging mechanism and drugs and the role of stem cells in anti-aging process. Exp. Gerontol. 2023, 179, 112248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Moskalev, A.; Chernyagina, E.; Kudryavtseva, A.; Shaposhnikov, M. Geroprotectors: A Unified Concept and Screening Approaches. Aging Dis. 2017, 8, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Prilepsky, A.Y.; Drozdov, A.S.; Bogatyrev, V.A.; Staroverov, S.A. Methods of Working with Cell Cultures and Determining the Toxicity of Nanomaterials; ITMO University: Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2019; 43p. [Google Scholar]
  61. Meikle, P.J.; Formosa, M.F.; Mellett, N.A.; Jayawardana, K.S.; Giles, C.; Bertovic, D.A.; Jennings, G.L.; Childs, W.; Reddy, M.; Carey, A.L.; et al. HDL Phospholipids, but Not Cholesterol Distinguish Acute Coronary Syndrome from Stable Coronary Artery Disease. J. Am. Heart. Assoc. 2019, 8, e011792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhu, X.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, Z.; Ma, S.; Feng, Q.; Wang, J.; Wu, G.; Ng, H.Y. Cytotoxicity evaluation of organophosphorus flame retardants using electrochemical biosensors and elucidation of associated toxic mechanisms. Water Res. 2024, 265, 122262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Sun, X.; Ji, J.; Jiang, D.; Li, X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Z.; Wu, Y. Development of a novel electrochemical sensor using pheochromocytoma cells and its assessment of acrylamide cytotoxicity. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2023, 44, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Damiatia, S.; Küpcüb, S.; Peacockd, M.; Eilenbergerb, C.; Zamzamia, M.; Qadrie, I.; Choudhrya, H.; Sleytrg, U.; Schusterb, B. Acoustic and hybrid 3D-printed electrochemical biosensors for the real-time immunodetection of liver cancer cells (HepG2). Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 94, 500–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Cell viability of (a) Wi-38 cells and (b) HepG2 cells after 24 h incubation with doxorubicin (DOX), water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC), and maltose monohydrate (M) at different concentrations. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n It is correct  = 6).
Figure 1. Cell viability of (a) Wi-38 cells and (b) HepG2 cells after 24 h incubation with doxorubicin (DOX), water-soluble form of phosphatidylcholine (wPC), and maltose monohydrate (M) at different concentrations. Data are mean ± standard deviation (n It is correct  = 6).
Biomedicines 13 00996 g001
Figure 2. Square-wave voltammograms (SWVs) of (a) Wi-38 and (b) HepG2 cells and calibration graphs of (c) Wi-38 and (d) HepG2 cells’ dependence of peak current intensity on cell concentration. The study was carried out with SWV in the potential range from 0 to +1.05 V. Peak intensities were recorded according to the number of cells on the electrode (cells/electrode).
Figure 2. Square-wave voltammograms (SWVs) of (a) Wi-38 and (b) HepG2 cells and calibration graphs of (c) Wi-38 and (d) HepG2 cells’ dependence of peak current intensity on cell concentration. The study was carried out with SWV in the potential range from 0 to +1.05 V. Peak intensities were recorded according to the number of cells on the electrode (cells/electrode).
Biomedicines 13 00996 g002aBiomedicines 13 00996 g002b
Figure 3. Square-wave voltammograms of SPE/CNT (−), and SPE/CNT with wPC at concentrations: 1.0 mg/mL (−); 0.1 mg/mL (−). p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3. Square-wave voltammograms of SPE/CNT (−), and SPE/CNT with wPC at concentrations: 1.0 mg/mL (−); 0.1 mg/mL (−). p ≤ 0.05.
Biomedicines 13 00996 g003
Figure 4. Square-wave voltammograms of (a) Wi-38 and (b,c) HepG2 cells treated with doxorubicin at concentrations of (b) 3 μg/mL and (c) 10 μg/mL. The study was performed with square-wave voltammetry in the potential range of 0 to +1.0 V. Peak intensities were recorded according to the number of cells per electrode (cells/electrode).
Figure 4. Square-wave voltammograms of (a) Wi-38 and (b,c) HepG2 cells treated with doxorubicin at concentrations of (b) 3 μg/mL and (c) 10 μg/mL. The study was performed with square-wave voltammetry in the potential range of 0 to +1.0 V. Peak intensities were recorded according to the number of cells per electrode (cells/electrode).
Biomedicines 13 00996 g004
Figure 5. Square-wave voltammograms of (a) Wi-38 and (b) HepG2 cells treated with maltose monohydrate (M) (4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL) and wPC at concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 0.1 mg/mL by PC. The study was performed with square-wave voltammetry in the potential range of 0 to +1.0 V.
Figure 5. Square-wave voltammograms of (a) Wi-38 and (b) HepG2 cells treated with maltose monohydrate (M) (4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL) and wPC at concentrations of 1 mg/mL and 0.1 mg/mL by PC. The study was performed with square-wave voltammetry in the potential range of 0 to +1.0 V.
Biomedicines 13 00996 g005
Figure 6. Histogram of the intensity of electrochemical oxidation of (a) Wi-38 and (b) HepG2 cells on electrode of untreated control and after incubation with maltose monohydrate (M) (concentrations of 4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL) and wPC (concentration of 0.1 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL by PC).
Figure 6. Histogram of the intensity of electrochemical oxidation of (a) Wi-38 and (b) HepG2 cells on electrode of untreated control and after incubation with maltose monohydrate (M) (concentrations of 4 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL) and wPC (concentration of 0.1 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL by PC).
Biomedicines 13 00996 g006
Figure 7. Comparative diagrams of cytotoxicity effects of the Wi-38 (a) and HepG2 (b) cells exposed to DOX, wPC, and maltose using the electrochemical method (*) and MTT assay (▪).
Figure 7. Comparative diagrams of cytotoxicity effects of the Wi-38 (a) and HepG2 (b) cells exposed to DOX, wPC, and maltose using the electrochemical method (*) and MTT assay (▪).
Biomedicines 13 00996 g007
Table 1. Cell viability of Wi-38 and HepG2 cell lines.
Table 1. Cell viability of Wi-38 and HepG2 cell lines.
SampleCell Viability
(Electrochemical Analysis),
% ± SD
Cell Viability
(MTT Assay), % ± SD
Wi-38 Cell Line
DOX 10 µg/mL68.9 ± 2.7350.5 ± 1.24
DOX 3 µg/mL65.41 ± 0.4757.13 ± 3.23
wPC 1 mg/mL80.6 ± 0.9279.13 ± 2.60
wPC 0.1 mg/mL99.6 ± 2.04 93.34 ± 2.20
Maltose 4 mg/mL94.8 ± 2.4897.0 ± 2.04
Maltose 0.4 mg/mL88.9 ± 1.77100 ± 0.97
HepG2 Cell Line
DOX 10 µg/mL53.2 ± 0.9354.0 ± 1.04
DOX 3 µg/mL77.7 ± 0.9360.0 ± 0.53
wPC 1 mg/mL79.7 ± 0.3681.0 ± 2.8
wPC 0.1 mg/mL91.5 ± 1.0093.0 ± 2.4
Maltose 4 mg/mL94.8 ± 0.1892.0 ± 1.95
Maltose 0.4 mg/mL83.2 ± 0.2786.0 ± 2.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pronina, V.V.; Kostryukova, L.V.; Ivanov, S.V.; Tichonova, E.G.; Archakov, A.I.; Shumyantseva, V.V. Label-Free Electrochemical Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Assay of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040996

AMA Style

Pronina VV, Kostryukova LV, Ivanov SV, Tichonova EG, Archakov AI, Shumyantseva VV. Label-Free Electrochemical Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Assay of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(4):996. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040996

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pronina, Veronica V., Lyubov V. Kostryukova, Sergey V. Ivanov, Elena G. Tichonova, Alexander I. Archakov, and Victoria V. Shumyantseva. 2025. "Label-Free Electrochemical Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Assay of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine" Biomedicines 13, no. 4: 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040996

APA Style

Pronina, V. V., Kostryukova, L. V., Ivanov, S. V., Tichonova, E. G., Archakov, A. I., & Shumyantseva, V. V. (2025). Label-Free Electrochemical Cell-Based Biosensor for Toxicity Assay of Water-Soluble Form of Phosphatidylcholine. Biomedicines, 13(4), 996. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13040996

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop