Next Article in Journal
Multiscale Imaging of Human Adipose Tissue: A Neglected Partner in Proteinuria Linked to Obesity
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Bisphenol A in the Development and Progression of Colorectal Cancer: Possible Sex-Specific Effects of Endogenous and Exogenous Estrogens
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Takotsubo Syndrome and Cancer: Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Perspectives

by
Adriana Correra
1,*,†,
Alfredo Mauriello
2,†,
Anna Chiara Maratea
2,
Celeste Fonderico
2,
Matilde Di Peppo
1,
Vincenzo Russo
3,
Antonello D’Andrea
4,
Giovanni Esposito
5 and
Natale Daniele Brunetti
1
1
Cardiology Department, Ospedali Riuniti University Hospital, Viale Pinto 1, 71122 Foggia, Italy
2
Complex Structure Cardiology, Institute National Cancer, IRCCS, Foundation “G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Cardiology Unit, Department of Medical and Translational Sciences, “Monaldi Hospital”, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
Cardiology and Intensive Care Unit, Department of Cardiology, Umberto I Hospital, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy
5
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2025, 13(11), 2718; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112718
Submission received: 26 September 2025 / Revised: 28 October 2025 / Accepted: 1 November 2025 / Published: 6 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular and Translational Medicine)

Abstract

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute, reversible cardiomyopathy that clinically mimics acute coronary syndrome in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. In oncology, TTS may be precipitated by the cancer milieu itself (stress, inflammation, neuroendocrine activation) and by antineoplastic therapies, notably fluoropyrimidines, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Cancer currently stands as the second leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cancer can directly induce TTS through an increase in catecholamines or indirectly via surgical and chemotherapeutic treatments. Several antineoplastic drugs are associated with an increased risk of TTS. We conducted a narrative, clinically oriented review. This narrative review aims to analyze the pathophysiological link between TTS and cancer and to explore potential preventive and therapeutic strategies in cancer patients.

1. Introduction

Takotsubo syndrome (TTS) is an acute and reversible cardiomyopathy that may present with a clinical presentation like acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [1] in the absence of non-obstructive coronary atherosclerotic disease [2]. TTS prevalence accounts for 2–3% of patients presenting with ACS [3] and increases to 5–6% in female patients [4]. A multimodality approach is often needed for the differential diagnosis with other acute cardiac presentations [5]. There are several pathophysiological hypotheses on the underlying mechanisms of TTS [6]; however, the activation of the sympathetic nervous system, triggered by emotional or physical stress, with massive release of catecholamines, seems to be the most plausible [7,8]. Cancer is a disease of uncontrolled proliferation by transformed cells subject to evolution by natural selection [9]. Incidence rates in the 50 selected registries range from over 400 per 100,000 males and 300 per 100,000 females to less than 100 per 100,000 in both males and females. Mortality rates in the 50 selected countries range from over 200 deaths per 100,000 males and over 100 deaths per 100,000 females to less than 50 deaths per 100,000 in both males and females. For both sexes, the highest rates are generally in North America, Oceania, and Europe [10]. Cancer is associated with several complications, including cardiac manifestations [11]. The term “cardiotoxicity” refers to the consequences of cancer treatment [11]. Among the cardiological manifestations, there is TTS. The prevalence of cancer in TTS is 10%, with a range of 4% to 29% [12]. TTS can be triggered both by cancer itself, through physical and psychological stress, and through surgical and pharmacological treatments. Our comprehensive review aims to define the pathophysiological relationships between TTS and cancer, which chemotherapy drugs can increase the risk of TTS, and what preventive strategies can be adopted in patients with cancer to prevent TTS. Figure 1 summarizes proposed mechanisms linking cancer and TTS [13].

2. Materials and Methods

This article is conceived as a narrative, clinically oriented review regarding the state of the art about the relationship between TTS and cancer. Its primary aim is to establish the pathophysiological link between TTS and cancer and to explore potential preventive and therapeutic strategies in cancer patients with a pragmatic synthesis of evidence and expert guidance, rather than to produce a formal systematic review or meta-analysis.
To ensure transparency in the selection of sources, we utilized a structured search strategy that guided, but did not solely determine, the narrative synthesis. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE for articles published from January 2010 to September 2025, employing combinations of the following keywords and Boolean operators: “Takotsubo” OR “Takotsubo Syndrome” AND (“cancer” OR “cardiotoxicity” OR “biomarkers” OR “imaging” OR “multidisciplinary care” OR “inflammation”). The search was limited to English-language publications with available abstracts.
Notably, we included clinical studies, prospective and retrospective cohorts, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and relevant registry reports addressing the risk of TTS in cancer patients.
We excluded narrative reviews, case reports, editorials, commentaries, experimental pre-clinical studies without direct clinical implications, and conference abstracts without full data.
Although the review is not systematic and no pooled quantitative synthesis was performed, we assessed the quality of included evidence by considering key domains relevant to clinical studies: patient selection (representativeness of study populations, inclusion/exclusion criteria); outcome ascertainment and follow-up (definition and measurement of cardiotoxicity or clinical endpoints); and control for confounding (adjustment for baseline cardiovascular risk factors, treatment exposure, and competing risks). This qualitative appraisal was informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklists for observational studies [14] and, when applicable, by the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias framework for randomized trials. These tools were used to guide judgment on the relative weight assigned to different types of evidence in the discussion.
Although we employed a reproducible search strategy for transparency, we did not adopt a full PRISMA methodology, including duplicate screening, formal scoring of risk of bias, or meta-analytic pooling, because of the heterogeneity of study designs (clinical trials, registries, organizational models, and policy analyses) and the practical focus on management and health-system implementation. A formal PRISMA-based systematic review was therefore considered inappropriate for the present purpose. To make this distinction explicit, we state that the search results were used to inform a structured narrative synthesis, not to support a systematic review. Wherever feasible, we specify in the text whether the conclusions derive from meta-analyses, multicenter studies, or smaller observational series, thereby enabling the reader to gauge the robustness of the evidence base.

3. Physiopathological Mechanisms of Takotsubo Syndrome

TTS is a condition whose pathophysiology is not yet fully understood, but current research suggests several key mechanisms. The most widely accepted hypothesis suggests that TTS is triggered by a surge of catecholamines, often following intense emotional or physical stress [15]. When a person experiences a significant stressor, their sympathetic nervous system is activated, releasing a large amount of catecholamines. This excess of hormones is thought to be a primary driver of TTS [16]. These high levels of catecholamines can damage the heart muscle in several ways [17]. Catecholamines can be directly toxic to heart cells, especially at the apex of the left ventricle (LV), which has a higher density of certain receptors that respond to these hormones [16,18,19]. Extremely high levels of epinephrine can paradoxically weaken heart contractions by altering the signaling pathways of beta-adrenergic receptors [20,21]. The activation of beta-adrenergic receptors can also lead to the production of harmful free radicals, causing oxidative stress and damage to the heart muscle [22,23]. While catecholamines are central to TTS, other factors may also contribute to the condition. The sudden release of catecholamines can lead to coronary artery spasms [24] and microvascular dysfunction [25], causing myocardial ischemia. However, this is likely a secondary effect rather than the primary cause, as perfusion defects in the heart often appear after cardiac dysfunction has already begun. In some cases, TTS is associated with an obstruction in the LV’s main outflow tract (LVOTO), which can cause apical subendocardial ischemia [26,27]. However, this is not seen in all TTS patients and is likely a complication rather than a central cause. Oxidative stress may impact TTS pathophysiology by endothelial dysfunction, which is caused by the disruption of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), an enzyme essential for maintaining vascular function. Inflammation is another key factor in the pathophysiology of TTS [28]. Elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and increased leukocyte counts, markers of systemic inflammation, are commonly observed in TTS patients [29].
The TTS pathophysiology is complex, and while a catecholamine surge appears to be the main trigger, other factors contribute to the full clinical picture. The transient nature of the condition and its rapid recovery with supportive care further highlight the unique mechanisms at play.

4. Specific Triggers in Cancer Patients

The link between cancer and TTS is complex and often explained by a “multi-hit hypothesis”. Emotional and psychosocial stress: emotional trauma related to a cancer diagnosis, a poor prognosis, or generalized emotional disorders affects nearly half of cancer patients and acts as a significant trigger [30]. Chronic inflammatory state: the inflammatory state induced by malignancy itself and circulating paraneoplastic mediators are considered risk factors. In REgistry on TAKOtsubo Syndrome (RETAKO), 463 patients were included (median age 73 years, 13% men), and higher levels of heart failure (HF) and inflammatory markers such as N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP) were identified as predictors of late recovery [16.0% vs. 8.6%, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–1.60] and increased severity in TTS patients with cancer (adjusted HR: 1.08; 95% CI: 1.04–1.13) [31]. Physical stress resulting from cancer surgery, radiation treatment, acute illness, pain crises, or systemic antineoplastic therapy can trigger TTS. In a meta-analysis of Brunetti et al., including 123,563 patients, physical stressors were reported to be more prevalent in TTS patients with cancer (58%) compared to controls (44%) (p = 0.0058) [32]. Certain tumors, such as those of neuroendocrine origin, can secrete large quantities of catecholamines, which may be responsible for the onset of TTS [33].

5. Chemotherapy and Takotsubo Syndrome

Numerous antineoplastic agents, including both traditional chemotherapy and targeted drugs, have been associated with TTS [34]. The proposed mechanism between antineoplastic drugs and TTS is described in Table 1.

5.1. Fluoropyrimidines

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the drug most frequently implicated in triggering TTS. Cardiotoxicity related to 5-FU may manifest as TTS, often occurring during or immediately after continuous infusion, commonly in the first cycle (70% of cases) [35]. Unlike TTS in the general population, 5-FU-related TTS shows a similar incidence in both sexes. Capecitabine, an oral prodrug of 5-FU, has also been linked to TTS, usually occurring during the first cycle of treatment [36].

5.2. Targeted Agents

These include vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors (e.g., bevacizumab) [37] and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as sunitinib and axitinib [38], and CAR-T cell therapy [39].

5.3. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

TTS is a recognized, although relatively rare, immune-related cardiovascular adverse event (irCVE) in patients receiving ICIs (ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, etc.). An analysis of the WHO global safety database (VigiBase®) [38] suggested that ICIs could potentially provoke TTS, with an overall reporting odds ratio (ROR) of 3.39 (95% CI 1.96–5.86, p < 0.0001) for all three major ICIs. The most common cancer types in reported ICI-related TTS cases are lung cancer (35%) and melanoma (29%). The median time to TTS onset after ICI initiation was reported as 77 days. Three cases (60%) occurred during the first 6 weeks of treatment.

5.4. Other Agents

Some case reports describe the use of rituximab [40] and anthracyclines [41,42] and TTS.

5.5. Radiotherapy

Radiation therapy (RT) for cancers in the thoracic/mediastinal region has been linked with heart damage following years of radiation exposure. Desai et al. [43], in a national registry including 5,991,314 hospitalizations with prior intrathoracic/mediastinal malignancies and RT, showed higher odds and increasing trends in TTS-related admissions with worse in-hospital outcomes among patients with prior intrathoracic/mediastinal cancer and RT (ptrend < 0.001), irrespective of the time interval from cancer diagnosis or RT to TTS occurrence.
The diagnosis of TTS in these patients is challenging due to the potential overlap with other severe cardiotoxicities, particularly myocarditis. Myocarditis requires urgent ICI discontinuation and high-dose corticosteroid administration. Five reported cases had concurrent myocarditis (possible or diagnosed). The diagnostic workup, based on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) or biopsy, is vital to exclude myocarditis [44,45]. Therefore, some cancer therapies, such as anthracyclines, can induce a secondary cardiomyopathy, called inflammatory cardiomyopathy [45]. Also in this context, CMR, or, rarely, biopsy, can help clinicians with diagnosis. Figure 1 represents the hypothetical mechanism underlying the relationship between TTS and chemotherapy agents.
Table 1 summarizes physiopathological and pharmacological links between cancer and TTS.

6. Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

6.1. Clinical Presentation

The clinical presentation of TTS in cancer patients often mimics acute coronary syndrome (ACS), typically manifesting as chest pain, dyspnea or syncope/pre-syncope [30]. In extreme circumstances, patients can present severe HF, cardiogenic shock, or arrhythmias requiring hemodynamic and sometimes ventilatory support. Patients with cancer can have subtle symptoms [46].
The diagnostic workup involves evaluating laboratory markers and echocardiographic data, as well as ruling out atherosclerotic ACS through prior coronary angiography. Finally, CMR is decisive for a definitive diagnosis. Cancer patients may have alterations dependent on previous cancer therapies.

6.2. Echocardiogram

Echocardiography is a cornerstone for the diagnosis of TTS, allowing for the identification of regional and global ventricular wall motion abnormalities in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease [47]. The key echocardiographic features include specific patterns of dysfunction, reversibility, and the lack of a single vascular territory involvement. The most unique and common finding in TTS is ventricular “ballooning.” This phenomenon, which gives the syndrome its name, manifests as an alteration in the kinetics of the LV. Four main patterns have been described:
Apical ballooning (classic pattern): This is the most frequent form, accounting for over 80% of cases. It is characterized by hypo-akinesis or dyskinesis of the apical and mid-ventricular segments. This is accompanied by a compensatory hyperkinesis of the basal segments, which keeps the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in a variable range, although it is often markedly reduced in the acute phase [48].
Mid-ventricular ballooning: A less common pattern, where akinesis or hypokinesis is localized to the mid-ventricular segments of the LV, with normal or hyperkinesis of both the apical and basal segments [48,49].
Reverse TTS (or basal ballooning): In this pattern, hypokinesis or akinesis affects the basal segments of the LV, while the apex and mid-segments show normal or increased contractility. This is a rarer finding and is more often seen in younger patients and those with physical triggers [50].
Focal TTS: A very rare pattern, where dysfunction is localized to a single area of the myocardium, without the widespread involvement typical of the other patterns [51].
In about a quarter of cases, echocardiography may also reveal an extension of the ballooning to the right ventricle (RV), with hypo-akinesis of the apical and mid-segments. This combined (biventricular) involvement further supports the diagnosis of TTS [52].
Furthermore, the peculiar hyperkinetic motion of the basal segments can lead to dynamic LVOTO. The exaggerated systole of the base can cause an acceleration of blood flow that “pulls” the anterior leaflet of the mitral valve toward the interventricular septum. This phenomenon, known as systolic anterior motion (SAM), is associated with an intraventricular pressure gradient and can lead to mitral regurgitation, as well as, in severe cases, cardiogenic shock [39].
Another fundamental echocardiographic feature of TTS is the complete reversibility of ventricular dysfunction. Follow-up echocardiography, typically within a few days or weeks, shows a gradual and complete recovery of LVEF and segmental motion [53]. This is an important finding for differentiating TTS from a myocardial infarction.
Finally, the segmental wall motion abnormalities in TTS do not correspond to the distribution territory of a single coronary artery. This finding, combined with coronary angiography, is pathognomonic for TTS [54].

6.3. Electrocardiogram

Patients usually exhibit new electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, such as ST-segment deviation, T-wave inversion and QTc interval prolongation [55]. ST-segment elevation is the most frequent finding in the acute phase, occurring in about 40% of cases. Unlike ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), where ST elevation is typically confined to a specific vascular territory, in TTS, the elevation tends to be more diffuse, typically involving precordial and inferior leads [56]. Corrected QT-interval (QTc) prolongation is a frequent finding and can persist for weeks or months. This finding is of clinical relevance as it increases the risk of malignant ventricular arrhythmias, such as torsades de pointes [57]. Unlike in STEMI, the development of pathological Q-waves is rare in TTS, suggesting the absence of transmural necrosis [58]. In some cases, a reduction in the amplitude of the R-wave in the precordial leads may be observed, but this is not a specific diagnostic criterion [58]. The absence of pathological Q-waves helps to distinguish TTS from a myocardial infarction [58]. Table 2 summarizes different ECG features between STEMI and TTS.

6.4. Biomarkers

Cardiac enzymes (troponin) show a mild elevation, disproportionately low compared to the extent of myocardium affected [59]. NT-proBNP levels are typically elevated, correlating with the degree of ventricular dysfunction [60]. In cancer patients, these markers may be increased due to other causes [60].

6.5. Coronary Angiography and Ventriculography

Coronary angiography (CA) must show the absence of obstructive coronary disease or acute plaque rupture [61]. The most distinctive and pathognomonic angiographic feature of TTS is the normality or absence of significant coronary lesions (>50% stenosis) that could justify clinical presentation. Although patients with TTS may occasionally have insignificant atherosclerotic plaques, CA does not reveal an acute obstruction caused by a thrombus or a critical stenosis in one of the epicardial arteries that could explain the ventricular wall motion abnormalities observed on the echocardiogram. This suggests a possible microvascular dysfunction that contributes to the transient myocardial dysfunction [62].
During CAG performed during the acute phase, left ventriculography is an invasive diagnostic test used to determine ventricular function. It is useful for excluding or confirming TTS [63]. Left ventriculography allows the evaluation of LV function and morphology, identifying the typical TTS patterns when echocardiography is not available or when wall motion abnormalities cannot be properly assessed with ultrasound [47]. Figure 2 represents typical apical ballooning TTS during left ventriculography.

6.6. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

In oncology patients, the differential diagnosis is critical. It must exclude ACS, via CAG, and myocarditis, especially relevant for ICI-treated patients. The differentiation between TTS and other chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) or immune-related myocarditis is often difficult, particularly if LV dysfunction is diffuse. For hemodynamically stable patients, CMR is the preferred non-invasive modality to exclude myocarditis, though endomyocardial biopsy remains the definitive test for unstable patients [45].
Similar to echocardiography, CMR allows for an accurate and reproducible evaluation of left and right ventricular function and wall motion. Cine-CMR images confirm the characteristic patterns of regional dysfunction already described. Therefore, tissue characterization in TTS is superior to echocardiography for differential diagnosis. Tissue characterization techniques include:
-
T2-weighted imaging: In the acute phase of TTS, myocardial hyperemia and inflammation caused by excess catecholamines lead to an increase in tissue water content. T2-weighted images show myocardial edema that typically extends along the dyskinetic segments. This edema is a sign of acute and transient injury [64].
-
Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE): LGE is the standard technique for identifying myocardial fibrosis or irreversible necrosis. In TTS, the characteristic finding is the absence of LGE in the segments with ventricular dysfunction. This absence is an essential differentiator from myocardial infarction, where LGE is present in a subendocardial or transmural pattern corresponding to the territory of an occluded coronary artery. The absence of LGE in TTS reflects the lack of irreversible necrosis, supporting the benign and transient nature of the condition [65].
-
T1 mapping and T2 mapping: These quantitative techniques offer a more sensitive and specific assessment of diffuse edema and fibrosis. In acute TTS, T2 mapping values are elevated, reflecting the edema, while T1 mapping values are typically normal or only slightly elevated [66]. Table 3 summarizes the different features between TTS and ICI myocarditis.

6.7. Prognosis

Cancer-associated TTS is associated with higher in-hospital adverse events than TTS without cancer. Delayed recovery of LV function (≥10 days) portends worse short- and long-term outcomes. TTS patients with coexisting malignancy face significantly worse outcomes. In a retrospective study that aimed to evaluate the association between the use of TTS and cancer survival rate, in-hospital mortality is substantially higher in TTS patients with cancer (12.8% to 13.8%, p < 0.05) compared to those without malignancy (2.9% to 3.8%, p < 0.05). The overall risk of clinical events at follow-up is also higher in the cancer group (RR 3.24). Factors associated with higher mortality include solid cancer (OR 3.43) and hematological cancer (OR 3.21) [67]. LV recovery is defined as normalization of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF > 50%, or return to a previously reported value) together with complete resolution of regional WMA present at admission. LV recovery is usually achieved within days to weeks. However, recovery is defined as late if it occurs 10 days or more after the index event. Late LV recovery is associated with worse short- and long-term survival [68].
Predictors of late recovery, in a multivariate analysis, are independent predictors including older age, history of neurological disorders, active cancer, physical triggers, bystander coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiogenic shock, lower LVEF at admission, and elevated inflammatory markers (NT-proBNP and hs-CRP) [69]. Therefore, the risk of death associated with late LV recovery increases exponentially, rising by 8% for every additional 10-day delay in time-to-LV recovery [70]. Non-cardiovascular and cardiovascular comorbidities are the main determinants of outcome in TTS, especially in the long term [71].

6.8. Therapeutic Management

Initial management involves supportive care, focusing on managing complications such as HF and cardiogenic shock [72].
For hemodynamically stable patients, the initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is the mainstay, including beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors (or ARBs) [73,74]. If LVOTO obstruction is present, positive inotropic agents, such as dopamine and dobutamine, and vasodilators should be avoided, as they can worsen the obstruction. Fluids, β-blockers, and vasoconstrictors should be considered as appropriate [75,76,77].
Due to apical akinesia, LV apical thrombosis is a possible complication in up to 4% of cases; in such cases, anticoagulation should be considered [78]. In a multicenter study [79] including 541 TTS patients, Santoro et al. found that 12 patients (2.2%) developed LV thrombi (all female presenting with apical ballooning pattern). Among these patients, 2 out of 12 (17%) had a stroke before anticoagulation initiation. These patients were characterized by a high prevalence of ST elevation and higher troponin I levels. Troponin I levels > 10 ng/mL were the only predictor of LV thrombosis (normal values = 0.5 ng/mL) [80]. However, the risk/benefit ratio must be considered in cancer patients, as they may be at both high thromboembolic and high bleeding risk. Therefore, the decision to initiate anticoagulant therapy in these patients should be individualized [80].
Regarding the reintroduction of oncologic therapy, it is a clinical challenge. If TTS is induced by ICIs, ICI treatment is generally stopped. For other antineoplastic drugs, some patients have safely resumed treatment after LVEF normalization, which typically takes about 20 days [81].

7. Future Perspective

The co-occurrence of TTS and malignancy, particularly in the context of advanced antineoplastic treatments like ICIs, presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Future research and clinical efforts should focus on the following priorities:
  • Pathophysiological distinction and diagnostic refinement: Further studies are required to definitively determine if cardiotoxicity induced by oncology drugs, especially ICIs, represents a true TTS, ICI-related myocarditis, or a distinct type of chemotherapy-related reversible non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. It is important to implement early diagnostic algorithms, including CMR and endomyocardial biopsy, to distinguish TTS from myocarditis in both clinically stable and unstable patients.
  • Risk stratification and surveillance: Identifying cancer patient cohorts at the highest risk of TTS and late LV recovery (e.g., those with active malignancy, physical triggers, and high inflammatory markers) is paramount. Prospective baseline screening using biomarkers, such as troponin and neuropeptides, and cardiac imaging in high-risk patients may enable targeted cardioprotection strategies.
  • Risk of recurrence: Most studies and registries report a recurrence rate that varies approximately between 1% and 6% of patients who have had a first episode. Recurrence can occur at variable time intervals, even several years after the initial event. Some studies suggest that the presence of neurological disorders and psychiatric disorders may be associated with a higher risk of recurrence, but there is no evidence regarding the role of cancer [82].
  • Optimal management and re-challenge safety: There is an unmet need to establish the optimal management of ICI-related TTS, including the definitive role of immunosuppressive therapy, such as corticosteroids, when myocarditis is excluded. Furthermore, definitive data regarding the safety and timing of reintroducing antineoplastic therapy, especially ICIs, after an episode of TTS are urgently needed. Decisions must currently be individualized by a multidisciplinary cardio-oncology team.
  • Prospective studies: Large, prospective multicenter registries are essential to gather high-granularity data on the long-term prognosis and true incidence of TTS in cancer survivors, particularly focusing on the adverse impact of delayed LV functional recovery.

8. Conclusions

TTS is a form of ACS generally triggered by either a physical or psychological stressor. The co-occurrence of TTS and cancer presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, particularly with the rise in advanced antineoplastic treatments like ICIs.
CMR and endomyocardial biopsy to accurately differentiate between TTS, ICI-related myocarditis, and other forms of chemotherapy-related cardiomyopathy. Better risk stratification is essential. Identifying cancer patients at the highest risk for developing TTS, such as those with active malignancy, physical triggers, and high inflammatory markers, is paramount. Prospective screenings using biomarkers such as troponin and natriuretic peptides could aid in implementing targeted cardioprotection strategies for these high-risk individuals.
Additionally, establishing optimal management practices for ICI-related TTS is an urgent priority. This includes determining the definitive role of immunosuppressive therapies, such as corticosteroids, in cases where myocarditis has been ruled out. Furthermore, we need clear, definitive data on the safety and ideal timing for reintroducing antineoplastic therapy after a TTS episode. Currently, these decisions must be made on an individualized basis by a multidisciplinary cardio-oncology team. Finally, large, prospective, multicenter registries are vital to gather high-quality data on the long-term prognosis and true incidence of TTS in cancer survivors, with a particular focus on the negative impact of delayed left ventricular functional recovery.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.M. and A.D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.M., A.C., C.F., A.C.M., A.D., V.R., M.D.P., N.D.B. and G.E.; writing—review and editing, A.M., A.C., C.F., A.C.M., A.D., V.R., M.D.P., N.D.B. and G.E.; supervision, G.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lyon, A.R.; Bossone, E.; Schneider, B.; Sechtem, U.; Citro, R.; Underwood, S.R.; Sheppard, M.N.; Figtree, G.A.; Parodi, G.; Akashi, Y.J.; et al. Current State of Knowledge on Takotsubo Syndrome: A Position Statement from the Taskforce on Takotsubo Syndrome of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2016, 18, 8–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ravindran, J.; Brieger, D. Clinical Perspectives: Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Intern. Med. J. 2024, 54, 1785–1795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kurowski, V.; Kaiser, A.; von Hof, K.; Killermann, D.P.; Mayer, B.; Hartmann, F.; Schunkert, H.; Radke, P.W. Apical and Midventricular Transient Left Ventricular Dysfunction Syndrome (Tako-Tsubo Cardiomyopathy) Frequency, Mechanisms, and Prognosis. Chest 2007, 132, 809–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Templin, C.; Ghadri, J.R.; Diekmann, J.; Napp, L.C.; Bataiosu, D.R.; Jaguszewski, M.; Cammann, V.L.; Sarcon, A.; Geyer, V.; Neumann, C.A.; et al. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy. New Engl. J. Med. 2015, 373, 929–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Singh, K.; Carson, K.; Usmani, Z.; Sawhney, G.; Shah, R.; Horowitz, J. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Incidence and Correlates of Recurrence of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014, 174, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Matta, A.G.; Carrié, D. Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Principles of Management of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: A Review. Med. Sci. Monit. 2023, 29, e939020-1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Matsukawa, T.; Sugiyama, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Kobayashi, F.; Mano, T. Gender Difference in Age-Related Changes in Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Healthy Subjects. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1998, 275, R1600–R1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Parashar, R. Age Related Changes in Autonomic Functions. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2016, 10, CC11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brown, J.S.; Amend, S.R.; Austin, R.H.; Gatenby, R.A.; Hammarlund, E.U.; Pienta, K.J. Updating the Definition of Cancer. Mol. Cancer Res. 2023, 21, 1142–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Torre, L.A.; Siegel, R.L.; Ward, E.M.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates and Trends—An Update. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2016, 25, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lyon, A.R.; López-Fernández, T.; Couch, L.S.; Asteggiano, R.; Aznar, M.C.; Bergler-Klein, J.; Boriani, G.; Cardinale, D.; Cordoba, R.; Cosyns, B.; et al. 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology Developed in Collaboration with the European Hematology Association (EHA), the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ESTRO) and the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS). Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 4229–4361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pelliccia, F.; Parodi, G.; Greco, C.; Antoniucci, D.; Brenner, R.; Bossone, E.; Cacciotti, L.; Capucci, A.; Citro, R.; Delmas, C.; et al. Comorbidities Frequency in Takotsubo Syndrome: An International Collaborative Systematic Review Including 1109 Patients. Am. J. Med. 2015, 128, 654.e11–654.e19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mauriello, A.; Giudice, C.D.; Vecchio, G.E.D.; Correra, A.; Maratea, A.C.; Grieco, M.; Amata, A.; Quagliariello, V.; Maurea, N.; Proietti, R.; et al. Takotsubo Syndrome and Oxidative Stress: Physiopathological Linkage and Future Perspectives. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roqué, M.; Martínez-García, L.; Solà, I.; Alonso-Coello, P.; Bonfill, X.; Zamora, J. Toolkit of Methodological Resources to Conduct Systematic Reviews. F1000Res 2020, 9, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sharkey, S.W.; Windenburg, D.C.; Lesser, J.R.; Maron, M.S.; Hauser, R.G.; Lesser, J.N.; Haas, T.S.; Hodges, J.S.; Maron, B.J. Natural History and Expansive Clinical Profile of Stress (Tako-Tsubo) Cardiomyopathy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2010, 55, 333–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Viceconte, N.; Petrella, G.; Pelliccia, F.; Tanzilli, G.; Cicero, D.O. Unraveling Pathophysiology of Takotsubo Syndrome: The Emerging Role of the Oxidative Stress’s Systemic Status. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 7515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sultana, S.S.; Nisar, S.; Kumar, F.M.; Khan, H.; Saeed, H.; Ahmed, G.; Malik, J. Role of Positive Emotions in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2023, 48, 101997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Samuels, M.A. Neurogenic Heart Disease: A Unifying Hypothesis. Am. J. Cardiol. 1987, 60, J15–J19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lyon, A.R.; Rees, P.S.; Prasad, S.; Poole-Wilson, P.A.; Harding, S.E. Stress (Takotsubo) Cardiomyopathy—A Novel Pathophysiological Hypothesis to Explain Catecholamine-Induced Acute Myocardial Stunning. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med. 2008, 5, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Heubach, J.F.; Ravens, U.; Kaumann, A.J. Epinephrine Activates Both Gs and Gi Pathways, but Norepinephrine Activates Only the Gs Pathway through Human Β2-Adrenoceptors Overexpressed in Mouse Heart. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004, 65, 1313–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, W.-Z.; Zheng, M.; Koch, W.J.; Lefkowitz, R.J.; Kobilka, B.K.; Xiao, R.-P. Dual Modulation of Cell Survival and Cell Death by β 2 -Adrenergic Signaling in Adult Mouse Cardiac Myocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 1607–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kobayashi, A.; Kang, M.-I.; Watai, Y.; Tong, K.I.; Shibata, T.; Uchida, K.; Yamamoto, M. Oxidative and Electrophilic Stresses Activate Nrf2 through Inhibition of Ubiquitination Activity of Keap1. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 26, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Nef, H.M.; Möllmann, H.; Troidl, C.; Kostin, S.; Böttger, T.; Voss, S.; Hilpert, P.; Krause, N.; Weber, M.; Rolf, A.; et al. Expression Profiling of Cardiac Genes in Tako-Tsubo Cardiomyopathy: Insight into a New Cardiac Entity. J. Mol. Cell Cardiol. 2008, 44, 395–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Saito, H.; Itoh, T.; Itoh, M.; Kanaya, Y.; Suzuki, T.; Hiramori, K. Simultaneous Multivessel Coronary Spasm Causing Acute Myocardial Infarction. Angiology 2007, 58, 112–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vitale, C.; Rosano, G.M.; Kaski, J.C. Role of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Circ. J. 2016, 80, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. El Mahmoud, R.; Mansencal, N.; Pilliére, R.; Leyer, F.; Abbou, N.; Michaud, P.; Nallet, O.; Digne, F.; Lacombe, P.; Cattan, S.; et al. Prevalence and Characteristics of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction in Tako-Tsubo Syndrome. Am. Heart J. 2008, 156, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mauriello, A.; Marrazzo, G.; Del Vecchio, G.E.; Ascrizzi, A.; Roma, A.S.; Correra, A.; Sabatella, F.; Gioia, R.; Desiderio, A.; Russo, V.; et al. Echocardiography in Cardiac Arrest: Incremental Diagnostic and Prognostic Role during Resuscitation Care. Diagnostics 2024, 14, 2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Li, X.; Yang, J.J.; Xu, D. The Role of Inflammation in Takotsubo Syndrome: A New Therapeutic Target? J. Cell Mol. Med. 2024, 28, e18503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ziegler, K.A.; Zeitler, M.; Meunier, S.; Sinicina, I.; Hasenbein, T.P.; Andergassen, D.; Bomhard, A.; van der Kwast, R.V.C.T.; Engelhardt, S. Ganglionic Inflammation in a Patient with Takotsubo Syndrome. Circulation 2025, 151, 890–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Desai, A.; Noor, A.; Joshi, S.; Kim, A.S. Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Cancer Patients. Cardio-Oncology 2019, 5, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Almendro-Delia, M.; López-Flores, L.; Uribarri, A.; Vedia, O.; Blanco-Ponce, E.; López-Flores, M.D.C.; Rivas-García, A.P.; Fernández-Cordón, C.; Sionis, A.; Martín-García, A.C.; et al. Recovery of Left Ventricular Function and Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2024, 84, 1163–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brunetti, N.D.; Tarantino, N.; Guastafierro, F.; De Gennaro, L.; Correale, M.; Stiermaier, T.; Möller, C.; Di Biase, M.; Eitel, I.; Santoro, F. Malignancies and Outcome in Takotsubo Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis Study on Cancer and Stress Cardiomyopathy. Heart Fail. Rev. 2019, 24, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aw, A.; de Jong, M.C.; Varghese, S.; Lee, J.; Foo, R.; Parameswaran, R. A Systematic Cohort Review of Pheochromocytoma-Induced Typical versus Atypical Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2023, 371, 287–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Keramida, K.; Farmakis, D.; Filippatos, G. Cancer and Takotsubo Syndrome: From Rarity to Clinical Practice. ESC Heart Fail. 2021, 8, 4365–4369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Grunwald, M.R.; Howie, L.; Diaz, L.A. Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy and Fluorouracil: Case Report and Review of the Literature. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012, 30, e11–e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cheriparambil, K.M.; Vasireddy, H.; Kuruvilla, A.; Gambarin, B.; Makan, M.; Saul, B.I. Acute Reversible Cardiomyopathy and Thromboembolism After Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil Chemotherapy. Angiology 2000, 51, 873–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Franco, T. Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Two Men Receiving Bevacizumab for Metastatic Cancer. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2008, 4, 1367–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ederhy, S.; Dolladille, C.; Thuny, F.; Alexandre, J.; Cohen, A. Takotsubo Syndrome in Patients with Cancer Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A New Adverse Cardiac Complication. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2019, 21, 945–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Oberoi, M.; Garvin, R.; Christensen, C.; Porter, T.R. Abstract 15188: Mid-Cavity Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Post CAR T-Cell Therapy. Circulation 2023, 148, A15188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gupta, R.; Sen, A.; Khosla, J.; Ranchal, P.; Aronow, W.S.; Shehu, M. Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Secondary to Rituximab. Am. J. Ther. 2022, 29, 451–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dobbin, S.J.H.; Petrie, M.C.; Myles, R.C.; Touyz, R.M.; Lang, N.N. Cardiotoxic Effects of Angiogenesis Inhibitors. Clin. Sci. 2021, 135, 71–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Camilli, M.; Cipolla, C.M.; Dent, S.; Minotti, G.; Cardinale, D.M. Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity in Adult Cancer Patients. Cardio Oncol. 2024, 6, 655–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Desai, R.; Desai, A.; Abbas, S.A.; Patel, U.; Bansod, S.; Damarlapally, N.; Doshi, R.; Savani, S.; Gangani, K.; Sachdeva, R.; et al. National Prevalence, Trends and Outcomes of Takotsubo Syndrome in Hospitalizations with Prior History of Mediastinal/Intrathoracic Cancer and Radiation Therapy. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 309, 14–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Trontzas, I.P.; Vathiotis, I.A.; Kyriakoulis, K.G.; Sofianidi, A.; Spyropoulou, Z.; Charpidou, A.; Kotteas, E.A.; Syrigos, K.N. Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy in Cancer Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Summary of Included Cases. Cancers 2023, 15, 2637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schulz-Menger, J.; Collini, V.; Gröschel, J.; Adler, Y.; Brucato, A.; Christian, V.; Ferreira, V.M.; Gandjbakhch, E.; Heidecker, B.; Kerneis, M.; et al. 2025 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Myocarditis and Pericarditis. Eur. Heart J. 2025, 46, 3952–4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Singh, T.; Khan, H.; Gamble, D.T.; Scally, C.; Newby, D.E.; Dawson, D. Takotsubo Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Emerging Concepts, and Clinical Implications. Circulation 2022, 145, 1002–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Citro, R.; Lyon, A.R.; Meimoun, P.; Omerovic, E.; Redfors, B.; Buck, T.; Lerakis, S.; Parodi, G.; Silverio, A.; Eitel, I.; et al. Standard and Advanced Echocardiography in Takotsubo (Stress) Cardiomyopathy: Clinical and Prognostic Implications. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2015, 28, 57–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Ludhwani, D.; Sheikh, B.; Patel, V.K.; Jhaveri, K.; Kizilbash, M.; Sura, P. Atypical Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy with Hypokinetic Left Mid-Ventricle and Apical Wall Sparing: A Case Report and Literature Review. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2020, 16, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tabira, A.; Misumi, I.; Sato, K.; Matsuda, H.; Iwasaki, T.; Usuku, H.; Tsujita, K. Mid-Ventricular Obstructive Cardiomyopathy after Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Intern. Med. 2023, 62, 2365–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Awad, H.H.; McNeal, A.R.; Goyal, H. Reverse Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Review. Ann. Transl. Med. 2018, 6, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tini, G.; Limite, L.R.; Arcari, L.; Cacciotti, L.; Russo, D.; Sclafani, M.; Brunelli, C.; Volpe, M.; Autore, C.; Musumeci, M.B. A Systematic Review on Focal Takotsubo Syndrome: A Not-so-Small Matter. Heart Fail. Rev. 2022, 27, 271–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Laumer, F.; Di Vece, D.; Cammann, V.L.; Würdinger, M.; Petkova, V.; Schönberger, M.; Schönberger, A.; Mercier, J.C.; Niederseer, D.; Seifert, B.; et al. Assessment of Artificial Intelligence in Echocardiography Diagnostics in Differentiating Takotsubo Syndrome from Myocardial Infarction. JAMA Cardiol. 2022, 7, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Buckley, B.J.R.; Harrison, S.L.; Hill, A.; Underhill, P.; Lane, D.A.; Lip, G.Y.H. Stroke-Heart Syndrome: Incidence and Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Complications Following Stroke. Stroke 2022, 53, 1759–1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Citro, R.; Rigo, F.; Ciampi, Q.; D’Andrea, A.; Provenza, G.; Mirra, M.; Giudice, R.; Silvestri, F.; Di Benedetto, G.; Bossone, E. Echocardiographic Assessment of Regional Left Ventricular Wall Motion Abnormalities in Patients with Tako-Tsubo Cardiomyopathy: Comparison with Anterior Myocardial Infarction. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2011, 12, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Wittstein, I.S.; Thiemann, D.R.; Lima, J.A.C.; Baughman, K.L.; Schulman, S.P.; Gerstenblith, G.; Wu, K.C.; Rade, J.J.; Bivalacqua, T.J.; Champion, H.C. Neurohumoral Features of Myocardial Stunning Due to Sudden Emotional Stress. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 539–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chhabra, L. ST-Elevation in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. J. Electrocardiol. 2023, 77, 78–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Madias, J.E. Electrocardiogram Repolarization Markers and Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome. Curr. Probl. Cardiol. 2024, 49, 102757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zeijlon, R.; Jha, S.; Le, V.; Chamat, J.; Shekka Espinosa, A.; Poller, A.; Thorleifsson, S.; Bobbio, E.; Mellberg, T.; Pirazzi, C.; et al. Temporal Electrocardiographic Changes in Anterior ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction versus the Takotsubo Syndrome. IJC Heart Vasc. 2023, 45, 101187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Bakhshi, H.; Gibson, C.M. MINOCA: Myocardial Infarction No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease. Am. Heart J. Plus Cardiol. Res. Pract. 2023, 33, 100312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Vogiatzis, I.; Dapcevic, I.; Datsios, A.; Koutsambasopoulos, K.; Gontopoulos, A. Grigoriadis, and A Comparison of Prognostic Value of the Levels of ProBNP and Troponin T in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). Med. Arch. 2016, 70, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Pelliccia, F.; Kaski, J.C.; Crea, F.; Camici, P.G. Pathophysiology of Takotsubo Syndrome. Circulation 2017, 135, 2426–2441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Misumida, N.; Ogunbayo, G.O.; Kim, S.M.; Abdel-Latif, A.; Ziada, K.M.; Sorrell, V.L. Clinical Outcome of Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Diagnosed with or Without Coronary Angiography. Angiology 2019, 70, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Padilla-Lopez, M.; Duran-Cambra, A.; Belmar-Cliville, D.; Soriano-Amores, M.; Arakama-Goikoetxea, S.; Vila-Perales, M.; Bragagnini, W.; Rodríguez-Sotelo, L.; Peña-Ortega, P.; Sánchez-Vega, J.; et al. Comparative Electrocardiographic Analysis of Midventricular and Typical Takotsubo Syndrome. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1286975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ojha, V.; Khurana, R.; Ganga, K.P.; Kumar, S. Advanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Br. J. Radiol. 2020, 93, 20200514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ghadri, J.-R.; Wittstein, I.S.; Prasad, A.; Sharkey, S.; Dote, K.; Akashi, Y.J.; Cammann, V.L.; Crea, F.; Galiuto, L.; Desmet, W.; et al. International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part II): Diagnostic Workup, Outcome, and Management. Eur. Heart J. 2018, 39, 2047–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Arcari, L.; Camastra, G.; Ciolina, F.; Belmonte, E.; De Santis, D.; Danti, M.; Caruso, D.; Maestrini, V.; Santoro, F.; Brunetti, N.D.; et al. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Takotsubo Syndrome: Clinical Correlates of T2 Mapping. Int. J. Cardiol. 2025, 419, 132716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lu, S.-Y.; Chen, J.-J.; Pan, J.-I.; Fu, Z.-X.; Wu, J.-L.; Hsieh, T.-C. The Association Between Different Patterns of Traditional Chinese Medicine Treatment and All-Cause Mortality Among Cancer Patients. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2019, 18, 1534735418823273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Givertz, M.M.; Mann, D.L. Epidemiology and Natural History of Recovery of Left Ventricular Function in Recent Onset Dilated Cardiomyopathies. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep. 2013, 10, 321–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Lachmet-Thébaud, L.; Marchandot, B.; Matsushita, K.; Dagrenat, C.; Peillex, M.; Sato, C.; Trimaille, A.; Reydel, A.; Trinh, A.; Ohlmann, P.; et al. Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Is a Major Determinant of Cardiovascular Outcome in Takotsubo Syndrome. Circ. J. 2020, 84, 592–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Núñez-Gil, I.J.; Vedia, O.; Almendro-Delia, M.; Raposeiras-Roubín, S.; Sionis, A.; Martin-García, A.C.; Martin-García, A.; Andrés, M.; Blanco, E.; Martín-de-Miguel, I.; et al. Implicaciones Clínicas y Pronósticas En Síndrome de Takotsubo y Cáncer: Percepciones Del Registro RETAKO. Med. Clin. 2020, 155, 521–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sclafani, M.; Arcari, L.; Russo, D.; Tini, G.; Limite, L.R.; Cacciotti, L.; Volpe, M.; Autore, C.; Musumeci, M.B. Long-Term Management of Takotsubo Syndrome: A Not-so-Benign Condition. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 22, 597–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Curigliano, G.; Cardinale, D.; Dent, S.; Criscitiello, C.; Aseyev, O.; Lenihan, D.; Cipolla, C.M. Cardiotoxicity of Anticancer Treatments: Epidemiology, Detection, and Management. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016, 66, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bybee, K.A.; Kara, T.; Prasad, A.; Lerman, A.; Barsness, G.W.; Wright, R.S.; Rihal, C.S. Systematic Review: Transient Left Ventricular Apical Ballooning: A Syndrome That Mimics ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Ann. Intern. Med. 2004, 141, 858–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Mauriello, A.; Ascrizzi, A.; Roma, A.S.; Molinari, R.; Caturano, A.; Imbalzano, E.; D’Andrea, A.; Russo, V. Effects of Heart Failure Therapies on Atrial Fibrillation: Biological and Clinical Perspectives. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Song, J.-K.; Sun, B.J.; Kim, D.-H.; Jung, S.H. Update on Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2025, 33, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mauriello, A.; Correra, A.; Quagliariello, V.; Iovine, M.; Di Micco, P.; Imbalzano, E.; Giallauria, F.; Giordano, A.; Russo, V.; D’Andrea, A.; et al. Atrial Fibrillation and Cancer: Pathophysiological Mechanism and Clinical Implications. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Citro, R.; Bellino, M.; Merli, E.; Di Vece, D.; Sherrid, M.V. Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Takotsubo Syndrome: How to Deal with Left Ventricular Ballooning? J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2023, 12, e032028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Santoro, F.; Stiermaier, T.; Guastafierro, F.; Tarantino, N.; Eitel, I.; Brunetti, N.D. Oral Anticoagulation in High Risk Takotsubo Syndrome: When Should It Be Considered and When Not? BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2018, 18, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Santoro, F.; Stiermaier, T.; Tarantino, N.; De Gennaro, L.; Moeller, C.; Guastafierro, F.; Marchetti, M.F.; Montisci, R.; Carapelle, E.; Graf, T.; et al. Left Ventricular Thrombi in Takotsubo Syndrome: Incidence, Predictors, and Management: Results from the GEIST (German Italian Stress Cardiomyopathy) Registry. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6, e006990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Habib, M.; Aronson, D. Thromboembolic Complications in Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2025, 51, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Tocchetti, C.G.; Farmakis, D.; Koop, Y.; Andres, M.S.; Couch, L.S.; Formisano, L.; Ciardiello, F.; Pane, F.; Au, L.; Emmerich, M.; et al. Cardiovascular Toxicities of Immune Therapies for Cancer—A Scientific Statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC and the ESC Council of Cardio-Oncology. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2024, 26, 2055–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Looi, J.-L.; Easton, A.; Webster, M.; To, A.; Lee, M.; Kerr, A.J. Recurrent Takotsubo Syndrome: How Frequent, and How Does It Present? Heart Lung Circ. 2024, 33, 1117–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms linking cancer and Takotsubo syndrome: catecholamine surge, receptor signaling changes (β1/β2; G-protein switching), microvascular dysfunction, oxidative stress/inflammation, and treatment-related triggers (fluoropyrimidines, VEGF/TKI agents, ICIs). β1AR: beta-1 adrenergic receptor; β2AR: beta-2 adrenergic receptor; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Gi: inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding proteins; Gs: stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding proteins; LVOTO: left ventricle outflow tract obstruction; PNL: phospholamin; SERCA2a: sarco-endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2a; SNS: sympathetic nervous system. VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor. ↑: increasing; ↓: decreasing.
Figure 1. Proposed mechanisms linking cancer and Takotsubo syndrome: catecholamine surge, receptor signaling changes (β1/β2; G-protein switching), microvascular dysfunction, oxidative stress/inflammation, and treatment-related triggers (fluoropyrimidines, VEGF/TKI agents, ICIs). β1AR: beta-1 adrenergic receptor; β2AR: beta-2 adrenergic receptor; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Gi: inhibitory guanine nucleotide-binding proteins; Gs: stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding proteins; LVOTO: left ventricle outflow tract obstruction; PNL: phospholamin; SERCA2a: sarco-endoplasmic reticulum calcium ATPase 2a; SNS: sympathetic nervous system. VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor. ↑: increasing; ↓: decreasing.
Biomedicines 13 02718 g001
Figure 2. Left ventriculography of apical ballooning TTS. (A) End-diastolic phase; (B) End-systolic phase.
Figure 2. Left ventriculography of apical ballooning TTS. (A) End-diastolic phase; (B) End-systolic phase.
Biomedicines 13 02718 g002
Table 1. Physiopathological and Pharmacological Links Between Cancer and TTS.
Table 1. Physiopathological and Pharmacological Links Between Cancer and TTS.
Risk Factor/TriggerAntineoplastic Agents ImplicatedPutative MechanismClinical Notes
Emotional/Psychosocial StressImmune checkpoint inhibitorsCatecholamine excess, activation of the sympathetic nervous system.TTS is associated with a higher incidence in females with cancer compared to the general population.
Chronic InflammationRituximab, fluoropyrimidines, VEGF inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitorsRelease of cytokines/paraneoplastic mediators modifying cardiac adrenoreceptors.Elevated NT-proBNP and hs-CRP predict late recovery and worse outcomes.
Traditional Chemotherapy
Targeted Therapies
5-FU, capecitabine, cisplatin, daunorubicin.Coronary vasospasm (most common theory for 5-FU), direct myocardial injury.5-FU-related TTS has a similar incidence across both sexes. Cardiotoxicity often occurs in the first cycle.
VEGF inhibitors, TKIs, trastuzumab.Endothelial dysfunction, TKI-related cardiotoxicity, indirect toxicity.Trastuzumab may induce the “reverse TTS” variant.
Ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab (monotherapy or combination).Immune-mediated toxicity, overlap with myocarditis, and potentially T-cell cross-reactivity.ICI exposure suggests a higher risk of TTS. Myocarditis exclusion (via CMR/biopsy) is essential.
5-FU: 5-fluorouracil; hs-CRP: high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ICIs: immune checkpoint inhibitors; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; TKIs: tyrosine kinase inhibitors; TTS: Takotsubo Syndrome; VEGF: vascular endothelial factors.
Table 2. Different ECG features between STEMI and TTS.
Table 2. Different ECG features between STEMI and TTS.
ECG FeaturesSTEMITTS
ST elevationRegional ST elevationDiffuse ST elevation
T-wave inversionRegional T-wave inversionDiffuse T-wave inversion
QTc evolutionNon-typicalTypical
STEMI: ST elevation myocardial infarction; TTS: Takotsubo syndrome.
Table 3. Onco-TTS vs. ICI myocarditis—practical triage.
Table 3. Onco-TTS vs. ICI myocarditis—practical triage.
FeaturesTTSICI Myocarditis
Symptoms/ECGDiffuse T-wave inversion and QTc prolongationHigh-grade AV block
BiomarkersTroponin patternTroponin pattern and inflammatory markers
CMREdema in dysfunctional segments with absent or minimal LGETypical LGE patterns
Endomyocardial biopsyIf unstable or inconclusiveIf unstable or inconclusive
ManagementAvoid agents that worsen LVOTO in TTSUse immunosuppression for suspected ICI myocarditis when appropriate
CMR: cardiac magnetic resonance; ECG: electrocardiogram; LGE: late gadolinium enhancement; LVOTO: left ventricular outflow tract obstruction; TTS: Takotsubo syndrome.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Correra, A.; Mauriello, A.; Maratea, A.C.; Fonderico, C.; Di Peppo, M.; Russo, V.; D’Andrea, A.; Esposito, G.; Brunetti, N.D. Takotsubo Syndrome and Cancer: Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Perspectives. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 2718. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112718

AMA Style

Correra A, Mauriello A, Maratea AC, Fonderico C, Di Peppo M, Russo V, D’Andrea A, Esposito G, Brunetti ND. Takotsubo Syndrome and Cancer: Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Perspectives. Biomedicines. 2025; 13(11):2718. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112718

Chicago/Turabian Style

Correra, Adriana, Alfredo Mauriello, Anna Chiara Maratea, Celeste Fonderico, Matilde Di Peppo, Vincenzo Russo, Antonello D’Andrea, Giovanni Esposito, and Natale Daniele Brunetti. 2025. "Takotsubo Syndrome and Cancer: Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Perspectives" Biomedicines 13, no. 11: 2718. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112718

APA Style

Correra, A., Mauriello, A., Maratea, A. C., Fonderico, C., Di Peppo, M., Russo, V., D’Andrea, A., Esposito, G., & Brunetti, N. D. (2025). Takotsubo Syndrome and Cancer: Pathophysiological Links and Clinical Perspectives. Biomedicines, 13(11), 2718. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13112718

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop