Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Cystic Fibrosis and Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes in Children: A Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Allyl Isothiocyanate Suppresses the Proliferation in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Mediating the KDM8/CCNA1 Axis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/biomedicines11102670
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the Timing of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on the Prognosis of Patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

by
Hsu-Hui Wang
1,2,3,†,
Ya-Ting Chen
2,†,
San-Fang Chou
4,
Li-Chung Lee
2,
Jia-Hong Wang
1,5,
Yi-Horng Lai
6 and
Hou-Tai Chang
1,5,7,*
1
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Center, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei 220216, Taiwan
2
Department of Chest Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei 220216, Taiwan
3
Department of Chemical Engineering & Material Science, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320315, Taiwan
4
Department of Medical Research, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei 220216, Taiwan
5
Department of Critical Care Medicine, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei 220216, Taiwan
6
Department of Healthcare Administration, Asia Eastern University of Science and Technology, Taipei 220303, Taiwan
7
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 320315, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2023, 11(10), 2670; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102670
Submission received: 18 August 2023 / Revised: 21 September 2023 / Accepted: 26 September 2023 / Published: 29 September 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Drug Discovery, Development and Delivery)
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) on the hearing recovery of patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). The clinical data of 79 patients diagnosed with ISSNHL and treated with HBOT between January 2017 and December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The pure tone audiometry (PTA) scores before and after HBOT were recorded. The associations of HBOT efficacy with demographic and clinical characteristics and the duration from disease onset to HBOT administration were determined. The average PTA score was 80.06 ± 25.94 dB before and 60.75 ± 21.26 dB after HBOT; the difference was significant. HBOT improved the hearing of 55.7% of the patients with ISSNHL (defined as an average PTA ≥ 11dB or a final average PTA score below 29 dB). There was a significant inverse relationship between the duration from symptom onset to HBOT administration and PTA score reduction after HBOT, which was adjusted for factors including age, sex, laterality of hearing loss, initial PTA score, reception of intratympanic steroid injections, tinnitus, dizziness, vertigo, diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. Commencing HBOT at an earlier stage is closely linked to greater improvements in hearing for patients with ISSNHL.

1. Introduction

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is characterized by a sudden onset of hearing impairment, typically exceeding 30 decibels (dB) over three consecutive frequencies within 72 h. It is not fatal, but it significantly impairs the quality of life of affected individuals. The annual incidence of ISSNHL ranges from 5 to 27 per 100,000 individuals, with approximately 66,000 new cases reported in the United States alone [1]. Previous studies have suggested spontaneous recovery rates of 32–65% [2,3,4].
The pathogenesis of ISSNHL has been debated, and several mechanisms have been suggested [5]. In addition to viral infections and cochlear membrane ruptures, vascular accidents and microvascular injuries have been proposed [6]. Patients diagnosed with ISSNHL have reduced oxygen tension in the vestibular perilymph [7]. Since 1980, the initial treatment approach for ISSNHL has primarily involved the administration of systemic corticosteroids (orally, intravenously, or intramuscularly), as recommended by the national and international consensus guidelines [1,3,5,8]. Other common treatment modalities include systemic vasodilation, intratympanic steroid injections (ITSIs), and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT).
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) is a widely recognized and accepted medical intervention. It involves the controlled inhalation of pure oxygen within a pressurized environment, typically exceeding 1.4 absolute atmospheric pressure. This treatment significantly elevates the concentration of oxygen in the bloodstream, enhancing its efficient transportation to tissues. It achieves this by surpassing levels achievable through normal respiration, thanks to increased dissolved oxygen concentration in plasma, a phenomenon governed by Henry’s law, which stipulates that the amount of diffused gas in a liquid is directly proportional to its partial pressure above the liquid.
During HBOT, transcutaneous oxygen pressure measurements often demonstrate improved tissue oxygenation [9,10,11]. The heightened oxygen levels in circulation yield a range of physiological effects, including enhanced tissue oxygenation, removal of toxic gases, expedited wound healing and tissue repair, augmented angiogenesis, reduced inflammation through the suppression of inflammatory cytokines like tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin 6, and interleukin 10, increased bactericidal activity of neutrophils, and stimulation of stem cell recruitment [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Furthermore, increased oxygen pressure yields other advantageous effects on ischemic soft tissues. It promotes energy metabolism preservation, mitigates swelling, bolsters microcirculation and tissue blood supply, encourages fibroblast proliferation and differentiation, elevates collagen synthesis, fosters neovascularization, and enhances the elimination of various bacteria through leukocyte activity [19] These mechanisms have led to extensive discussions on the utility of HBOT in aiding wound healing, particularly in cases of chronic non-healing wounds and severe soft tissue injuries [13,20,21,22,23,24]. Additionally, its benefits in wound healing have been documented in animal models [25]. Beyond wound healing, HBOT finds numerous applications in medicine. These encompass late radiation injury [26], treatment for carbon monoxide poisoning [27], management of retinal artery occlusion [28], amelioration of neuropsychological deficits [29], and assistance in the resolution of intestinal obstruction [30]. Notably, HBOT has also demonstrated efficacy in improving myocardial function in patients suffering from post-COVID-19 syndrome [31]. Extensive clinical evidence has demonstrated the safety of HBOT; the most common adverse effect of HBOT is barotrauma of the middle ear. Severe complications, such as oxygen toxicity of the central nervous system, are rare and typically reversible [32].
ISSNHL has been investigated as a potential indication for HBOT since the 1970s, guided by the hypothesis that HBOT can alleviate cochlear hypoxia [10,11]. Besides, the mechanism of HBOT in wound healing can also be applied to improving ISSNHL. In a systematic review conducted by Joshua et al. in 2021 [33], HBOT as part of combination treatment was associated with improved hearing recovery in patients diagnosed with ISSNHL. A meta-analysis conducted by Rhee et al. in 2018 further supported the inclusion of HBOT as a viable treatment option for ISSNHL, especially in patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss at the initial assessment. Another meta-analysis demonstrated that HBOT could be a reasonable addition to standard medical therapy for ISSNHL when administered as salvage treatment for an extended duration [34]. In a 2012 Cochrane review, the use of HBOT resulted in a significant improvement in the hearing outcomes of patients with ISSNHL [35]. Since 2011, the Undersea Hyperbaric Medicine Society (UHMS) has included ISSNHL in its list of approved indications for HBOT. Additionally, the European Committee on Hyperbaric Medicine (ECHM) issued a type 1 recommendation endorsing the use of HBOT as a treatment option for ISSNHL in 2016 [36]. The 2019 practice guidelines of the American Academy of Otolaryngology recommended HBOT as an optional initial treatment within two weeks of symptom onset in patients with ISSNHL. HBOT has also been suggested as salvage therapy for patients who do not respond to initial pharmacological therapy within one month [1]. Nevertheless, the optimal timing for initiating HBOT in patients with ISSNHL is yet to be established, given that there are limited studies on it and their relevance is limited [37,38,39].
In our daily practice, we have observed that the chances of hearing loss recovery in patients with ISSNHL increase when they receive HBOT at an earlier stage from the onset of symptoms. However, the question arises: what constitutes ‘early’ in this context, and does the timing of HBOT indeed influence the recovery rate? Additionally, we have noted instances where patients with ISSNHL were referred for HBOT evaluation as a salvage therapy only after other treatment modalities had failed to improve hearing loss for a duration of four weeks or longer from symptom onset. Unfortunately, our clinical observations suggest limited benefits in such cases.
To bridge this knowledge gap, we initiated a retrospective study to investigate the potential impact of the timing of HBOT on the prognosis of patients with ISSNHL. Our objective was to validate our hypothesis: that earlier administration of HBOT would lead to more significant improvements in hearing recovery.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

This retrospective study analyzed the data of patients diagnosed with SSNHL who received HBOT at the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital (FEMH) between 2017 and 2019. The inclusion criteria for this study involved selecting patients aged 20 years or older, diagnosed with ISSNHL, and who received HBOT at FEMH. The exclusion criteria for this study included age of <20 years, known hearing loss etiology, bilateral or previous ipsilateral hearing loss, HBOT initiation beyond 180 days after symptom onset, insufficient follow-up data for pure-tone audiometry (PTA), fewer than three HBOT sessions, and lack of audiogram data beyond one week after the initial HBOT session. A cohort of 79 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria was included in the analysis. Along with HBOT, most patients (all except one) received steroid treatments, such as systemic steroids (oral or intravenous) or ITSIs, in otorhinolaryngology clinics. Ethical approval was obtained from the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Ethics Committee (no. FEMH-IRB-110231-E, approved on 26 October 2021). Informed consent is waived under FEMH Ethnics Committee agreement due to the observational nature of the investigation. No new interventions or interactions with patients are involved, as the data has already been collected for clinical purposes. Additionally, the retrospective design ensures that patient identities remain anonymized, and confidentiality is maintained throughout the research process.

2.2. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT)

The therapy center at the FEMH used the HAUX Starmed 2200 hyperbaric chamber, manufactured by Haux-Life-Support GmbH in Karlsbad, Germany, for HBOT administration. Each HBOT session was conducted at a pressure of 2.5 absolute atmospheres and lasted for 120 min. This protocol comprises a 15-min descent time, a 90-min bottom time, and a 15-min ascent time. Patients received pure oxygen during the bottom and ascent phases, with two 5-min air breaks during the bottom phase to mitigate the risk of oxygen toxicity, and the last 3 min of the ascent phase also involved a switch to air. Each session’s duration of pure oxygen breathing is estimated to be 92 min. The treatment sessions were conducted daily. Ten to 20 HBOT sessions have been recommended by previous studies, but the actual number of sessions varied for each patient based on their needs and response to treatment.

2.3. Audiogram Evaluation

PTA was used to evaluate hearing improvement in individuals presenting with ISSNHL symptoms. PTA scores in decibels (dB) were determined for the frequencies of 250, 500, 1000, 2000 and 4000 Hz. The average PTA score was calculated and is reported in this study. The initial PTA score was determined based on the most recent audiogram obtained before HBOT initiation. The outcomes were recorded following the completion of the HBOT sessions. In this study, the overall improvement was defined as an average PTA improvement exceeding 10 dB or a final average PTA score below 29 dB.

2.4. Data Analysis

The main aim of this retrospective study was to examine the correlations between the efficacy of HBOT and various factors. These factors included the duration from the onset of symptoms to the initiation of HBOT, demographic characteristics, clinical features (such as the side of hearing loss, initial PTA, presence of comorbidity, and associated symptoms), and use of systemic corticosteroids or ITSIs.
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess the normality of the numerical data. Normally distributed data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, whereas non-normally-distributed data are represented as medians (Q1, Q3). Categorical data were presented as frequencies and percentages. The paired-sample t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the pre-and post-HBOT continuous data.
To investigate the differences in hearing improvement across various durations from symptom onset to HBOT, a combination of one-way ANOVA/Welch and post-hoc Games-Howell analyses were conducted. Univariate and multivariate linear regression were used to assess the impact of the duration from symptom onset to HBOT on hearing improvement while considering other covariates.
The threshold for determining statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

The study enrolled 79 participants. Table 1 summarizes their demographic and clinical characteristics. Seventeen (21.5%), 25 (31.6%), 20 (25.3%), and 17 (21.5%) received HBOT ≤ 7, 8–14, 15–30, and >30 days after symptom onset, respectively. Seventy-eight (98.7%) received systemic steroids within one week, and 49 (62.0%) received ITSIs.
Table 2 compares the hearing loss grades of the patients diagnosed with ISSNHL before and after receiving HBOT. The average PTA score for hearing loss was 60.75 ± 21.26 dB after and 80.06 ± 25.94 dB before HBOT; the difference was significant (p < 0.001).
Table 3 presents the data on the effectiveness of HBOT in improving the PTA score. The median PTA improvement was 13 dB (range, −10–60 dB). Among the patients, 55.7% experienced overall improvement, defined as an average increase in the PTA score exceeding 10 dB or a final average PTA score below 29 dB. Additionally, 16.5% of the participants achieved complete recovery with a PTA score of 29 dB or lower.
Linear regression showed an inverse correlation between the duration from symptom onset to the initiation of HBOT and the reduction in PTA score (ΔPTA) after HBOT (Beta = −0.293, p < 0.001) (Table 4). Compared with the patients who received HBOT within 7 days after symptom onset (Period 1), those who received it 8–14 (Period 2), 15–30 (Period 3), and >30 (Period 4) days had lower mean ΔPTA values. This suggests that a delay in the initiation of HBOT after symptom onset may impede hearing recovery.
Incorporating a multivariate linear regression analysis, we accounted for several potential variables that could potentially influence the observed improvement. These encompassed factors such as age, sex, laterality of hearing loss, initial PTA score, receipt of ITSI, as well as coexisting conditions including tinnitus, dizziness, vertigo, diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. The analysis revealed a noteworthy correlation between the efficacy of HBOT and the time elapsed from the onset of symptoms to the commencement of treatment (Beta = −0.296, p < 0.001), even subsequent to meticulous adjustment for these aforementioned variables (delineated in Table 5).
In these 79 patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and receiving HBOT, the most common complication is eardrum barotrauma, whose severity is often mild and self-limited. They did not experience CNS toxicity during HBOT.

4. Discussion

The primary objective of this retrospective study was to establish the ideal timing for initiating HBOT in patients diagnosed with ISSNHL. To achieve this, we examined the influence of the timing of HBOT initiation on hearing improvement. Our findings revealed a significant negative correlation between the duration from symptom onset to the commencement of HBOT and the magnitude of improvement in the PTA score. These results strongly indicate that initiating HBOT earlier is associated with greater hearing improvement in patients with ISSNHL. Notably, this observation is a novel contribution to the existing literature.
The pathophysiology of ISSNHL is closely related to the condition of the inner ear [40]. In a systemic review conducted by Yamada et al. [6], ISSNHL’s development may result from disruptions in cochlear circulation and cochlear damage caused by infections or inflammation stemming from other etiologies. Maintaining normal cochlear microcirculation is crucial for the inner ear since sensory hair cells are susceptible to hypoxia, which can impact hearing thresholds. [41] In an animal study led by Kerstin Lamm et al. [42], it was observed that noise-induced cochlear hypoxia could potentially be compensated for by HBOT. This suggests that HBOT might improve inner ear hypoxia, thereby improving hearing loss. Furthermore, inflammation-induced cochlear damage plays a significant role in hearing loss [43]. The anti-inflammatory effects of HBOT [19] may also contribute to its ability to reduce cochlear inflammation by decreasing inflammatory mediators, thereby improving hearing loss.
Goto et al. [44] observed that initiating HBOT within two weeks of symptom onset led to better hearing recovery, especially when combined with steroid treatment. Similarly, a retrospective study by Yıldırım et al. [37] demonstrated that initiating HBOT within the first 14 days of diagnosis positively influenced the prognosis of patients with ISSNHL. A separate retrospective study conducted by Muzzi et al. [45] demonstrated the potential of HBOT in improving pure-tone hearing thresholds in patients with ISSNHL who did not respond to medical therapy alone. This study further demonstrated that favorable outcomes were more likely when HBOT was administered within 30 days after symptom onset. Kayalıet al [46] reported follow-up outcomes indicating that salvage HBOT three weeks after the onset of ISSNHL symptoms was not significantly effective in patients who did not respond to corticosteroid treatment. Chin et al. [47] reported a cutoff of 12.5 days as the optimal timing for initiating HBOT for patients with ISSNHL. This conclusion was based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Therefore, early initiation of HBOT may lead to better treatment outcomes for ISSNHL, consistent with our analysis and findings from the existing literature. Furthermore, the results of our study indicate that the optimal outcome of HBOT for ISSNHL is not confined to a specific time window but rather occurs when treatment is initiated as early as possible from the onset of symptoms. Likewise, Mariani et al.’s study raised questions regarding the use of HBOT and ITSI as salvage therapies [48].
Our study also revealed a significant positive correlation between the severity of initial hearing loss and improvement in PTA scores. Individuals with more severe hearing loss at baseline may experience marked benefits from HBOT. In another retrospective study by Ajduk et al., significant improvements in hearing thresholds were observed across all frequencies for patients with hearing loss exceeding 61 dB who received salvage HBOT after failed steroid treatment for ISSNHL [49].
Most patients in our study received systemic corticosteroids within one week of experiencing ISSNHL symptoms. Therefore, recovery from hearing impairment in our study was not affected by the duration from symptom onset to the administration of systemic steroids.
Based on our observations, ITSIs had no significant impact on hearing improvement in patients diagnosed with ISSNHL receiving HBOT. A meta-analysis conducted by Sialakis et al. [50] also indicated that there was no significant difference between the efficacies of intratympanic and systemic steroid therapies. Further randomized prospective studies are required to improve our understanding of these results. Nonetheless, ITSIs remain a viable treatment option for patients with contraindications to systemic steroids when considering HBOT.
Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease did not have a significant effect on the overall improvement in hearing loss in patients with ISSNHL. This implies that individuals with these comorbidities may benefit from HBOT as a viable treatment option for ISSNHL.
We obtained audiograms within 180 days from the onset of ISSNHL to monitor changes in the PTA scores. Based on our patient data, we observed that hearing changes tended to stabilize approximately one month after ISSNHL onset. Moon et al. [51] suggested that the prognosis of ISSNHL can be predicted approximately two weeks after the initiation of treatment. They also recommended follow-up with audiograms for at least two months after treatment for patients with incomplete or delayed hearing improvement. Liu et al. [52] reported that the curative effect of treatment for ISSNHL stabilized after two months. Therefore, we consider a two-month follow-up period for audiograms appropriate for evaluating treatment efficacy.
Several other studies have explored the optimal timing of HBOT for ISSNHL [37, 46, 48]. We believe our study adds a valuable contribution to the existing literature for several compelling reasons:
1. **Novel Inverse Relationship**: Our study distinguishes itself by being among the few to elucidate an inverse relationship between the duration of receiving HBOT from the onset of symptoms and the improvement of hearing loss. Unlike most papers on this topic that simply identify specific time windows, we delve into the dynamic relationship between timing and outcomes.
2. **Comparable Patient Numbers**: Our study ensures comparability by maintaining similar patient numbers across different durations. This approach strengthens the validity of our comparisons regarding the effects of treatment duration.
3. **Clinical Realism**: We acknowledge the clinical reality where some patients turn to HBOT as a salvage therapy after other treatments have failed. Drawing from our observations, we advocate for early HBOT intervention, as we have noticed that delays in treatment initiation may result in less favorable outcomes.
These distinctive features of our study enrich the current body of literature on HBOT for ISSNHL, providing valuable insights for both researchers and clinicians.

5. Strength & Limitation

This study had several limitations primarily attributed to its retrospective design and relatively small sample size. Additionally, the treatment regimens, including systemic corticosteroids and ITSIs, administered to each patient were not standardized but based on individualized assessments. This may have influenced the outcomes of the study. To validate these findings, further studies involving larger samples and more rigorous study designs are required.

6. Conclusions

This study underscores the critical role of the timing of HBOT initiation in determining the prognosis of patients with ISSNHL. Our findings strongly support the notion that commencing HBOT at an earlier stage is closely linked to greater improvements in hearing for patients with ISSNHL. This discovery holds substantial implications for clinical decision-making, emphasizing the importance of early HBOT administration as an integral part of the treatment for ISSNHL, rather than solely as a last-resort salvage therapy following unsuccessful attempts with other treatment modalities. Future prospective studies with larger sample sizes are warranted to validate these results and gain deeper insights into the therapeutic advantages of HBOT in ISSNHL.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.-H.W. and H.-T.C.; Data curation, Y.-T.C., L.-C.L. and Y.-H.L.; Funding acquisition, H.-H.W.; Investigation, Y.-T.C. and L.-C.L.; Project administration, H.-H.W. and J.-H.W.; Resources, H.-H.W. and J.-H.W.; Data analysis, Y.-H.L. and S.-F.C.; Supervision, H.-T.C.; Writing: original draft, H.-H.W., Y.-H.L. and S.-F.C.; Writing: review and editing, H.-T.C., J.-H.W. and S.-F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (grant FEMH-2022-C-023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taiwan (FEMH-110231-E, approved on 26 October 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent is waived under FEMH Ethnics Committee agreement due to the observational nature of the investigation. No new interventions or interactions with patients are involved, as the data has already been collected for clinical purposes. Additionally, the retrospective design ensures that patient identities remain anonymized, and that confidentiality is maintained throughout the research process.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in the published article. Data are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank Mei-Yun Chang (Center of Hyperbaric Oxygen, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chandrasekhar, S.S.; Tsai Do, B.S.; Schwartz, S.R.; Bontempo, L.J.; Faucett, E.A.; Finestone, S.A.; Hollingsworth, D.B.; Kelley, D.M.; Kmucha, S.T.; Moonis, G. Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update). Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019, 161 (Suppl. 1), S1–S45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mattox, D.E.; Simmons, F.B. Natural history of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1977, 86 Pt 1, 463–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wilson, W.R.; Byl, F.M.; Laird, N. The efficacy of steroids in the treatment of idiopathic sudden hearing loss. A double-blind clinical study. Arch. Otolaryngol. 1980, 106, 772–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Bayoumy, A.B.; van der Veen, E.L.; Alexander de Ru, J. Assessment of Spontaneous Recovery Rates in Patients With Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2018, 144, 655–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Marx, M.; Younes, E.; Chandrasekhar, S.S.; Ito, J.; Plontke, S.; O’Leary, S.; Sterkers, O. International consensus (ICON) on treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis. 2018, 135, S23–S28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yamada, S.; Kita, J.; Shinmura, D.; Nakamura, Y.; Sahara, S.; Misawa, K.; Nakanishi, H. Update on Findings about Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Insight into Its Pathogenesis. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 6387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nagahara, K.; Fisch, U.; Yagi, N. Perilymph oxygenation in sudden and progressive sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 1983, 96, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Herrera, M.; García Berrocal, J.R.; García Arumí, A.; Lavilla, M.J.; Plaza, G. Update on consensus on diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Acta Otorrinolaringol. Esp. 2019, 70, 290–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yamamoto, N.; Takada, R.; Maeda, T.; Yoshii, T.; Okawa, A.; Yagishita, K. Microcirculation and tissue oxygenation in the head and limbs during hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Diving Hyperb. Med. 2021, 51, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hodges, A.N.; Delaney, S.; Lecomte, J.M.; Lacroix, V.J.; Montgomery, D.L. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen on oxygen uptake and measurements in the blood and tissues in a normobaric environment. Br. J. Sports Med. 2003, 37, 516–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Armand, C.; Grzegorz, K.; Agata, S.; Marek, K.; Mariusz, N.; Aleksander, S.; Zofia, D. Thermal imaging and TC oximetry measurements of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) effects on trophic ulceration of the crura. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2012, 108, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shinomiya, N. Molecular Mechanisms of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. In Hyperbaric Oxygenation Therapy: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications; Shinomiya, N., Asai, Y., Eds.; Springer Singapore: Singapore, 2020; pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ortega, M.A.; Fraile-Martinez, O.; García-Montero, C.; Callejón-Peláez, E.; Sáez, M.A.; Álvarez-Mon, M.A.; García-Honduvilla, N.; Monserrat, J.; Álvarez-Mon, M.; Bujan, J.; et al. A General Overview on the Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy: Applications, Mechanisms and Translational Opportunities. Medicina 2021, 57, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sander, A.L.; Henrich, D.; Muth, C.M.; Marzi, I.; Barker, J.H.; Frank, J.M. In vivo effect of hyperbaric oxygen on wound angiogenesis and epithelialization. Wound Repair. Regen. 2009, 17, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Poyrazoglu, Y.; Topal, T.; Yuksel, R.; Bircan, F.S.; Simsek, K.; Gocgeldi, E.; Ersoz, N.; Korkmaz, A. Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygen and Preconditioning on Wound Healing in Colonic Anastomoses. J. Invest. Surg. 2015, 28, 188–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Thom, S.R.; Milovanova, T.N.; Yang, M.; Bhopale, V.M.; Sorokina, E.M.; Uzun, G.; Malay, D.S.; Troiano, M.A.; Hardy, K.R.; Lambert, D.S.; et al. Vasculogenic stem cell mobilization and wound recruitment in diabetic patients: Increased cell number and intracellular regulatory protein content associated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Wound Repair. Regen. 2011, 19, 149–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Heyboer, M., 3rd; Milovanova, T.N.; Wojcik, S.; Grant, W.; Chin, M.; Hardy, K.R.; Lambert, D.S.; Logue, C.; Thom, S.R. CD34+/CD45-dim stem cell mobilization by hyperbaric oxygen—Changes with oxygen dosage. Stem Cell Res. 2014, 12, 638–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Choudhury, R. Hypoxia and hyperbaric oxygen therapy: A review. Int. J. Gen. Med. 2018, 11, 431–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Wolde, S.D.; Hulskes, R.H.; Weenink, R.P.; Hollmann, M.W.; Van Hulst, R.A. The Effects of Hyperbaric Oxygenation on Oxidative Stress, Inflammation and Angiogenesis. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jain, K.K.; Jain, K. HBO therapy in wound healing, plastic surgery, and dermatology. In Textbook of Hyperbaric Medicine; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 183–205. [Google Scholar]
  21. Yamada, N.; Toyoda, I.; Ogura, S. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the management of severe soft tissue injuries. In Hyperbaric Oxygenation Therapy: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications; Springer Nature: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 81–103. [Google Scholar]
  22. de Smet, G.H.J.; Kroese, L.F.; Menon, A.G.; Jeekel, J.; van Pelt, A.W.J.; Kleinrensink, G.J.; Lange, J.F. Oxygen therapies and their effects on wound healing. Wound Repair. Regen. 2017, 25, 591–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bhutani, S.; Vishwanath, G. Hyperbaric oxygen and wound healing. Indian J. Plast. Surg. 2012, 45, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Glik, J.; Cholewka, A.; Stanek, A.; Englisz, B.; Sieroń, K.; Mikuś-Zagórska, K.; Knefel, G.; Nowak, M.; Kawecki, M. Thermal imaging and planimetry evaluation of the results of chronic wounds treatment with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Adv. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019, 28, 229–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, R.F.; Lin, Y.N.; Liu, K.F.; Lee, C.C.; Hu, C.J.; Wang, C.T.; Wang, C.J.; Kuo, Y.R. Compare the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave and hyperbaric oxygen therapy on enhancing wound healing in a streptozotocin-induced diabetic rodent model. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Lin, Z.C.; Bennett, M.H.; Hawkins, G.C.; Azzopardi, C.P.; Feldmeier, J.; Smee, R.; Milross, C. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for late radiation tissue injury. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023, 8, Cd005005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Weaver, L.K. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1217–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Weiss, J.N. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment of retinal artery occlusion. Undersea Hyperb. Med. 2010, 37, 167–172. [Google Scholar]
  29. Marcinkowska, A.B.; Mankowska, N.D.; Kot, J.; Winklewski, P.J. Impact of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Cognitive Functions: A Systematic Review. Neuropsychol. Rev. 2022, 32, 99–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ambiru, S.; Furuyama, N.; Aono, M.; Kimura, F.; Shimizu, H.; Yoshidome, H.; Miyazaki, M.; Shimada, H.; Ochiai, T. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for the treatment of postoperative paralytic ileus and adhesive intestinal obstruction associated with abdominal surgery: Experience with 626 patients. Hepatogastroenterology 2007, 54, 1925–1929. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Leitman, M.; Fuchs, S.; Tyomkin, V.; Hadanny, A.; Zilberman-Itskovich, S.; Efrati, S. The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on myocardial function in post-COVID-19 syndrome patients: A randomized controlled trial. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Plafki, C.; Peters, P.; Almeling, M.; Welslau, W.; Busch, R. Complications and side effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2000, 71, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  33. Joshua, T.G.; Ayub, A.; Wijesinghe, P.; Nunez, D.A. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy for Patients With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2021, 144, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Rhee, T.M.; Hwang, D.; Lee, J.S.; Park, J.; Lee, J.M. Addition of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy vs Medical Therapy Alone for Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2018, 144, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Bennett, M.H.; Kertesz, T.; Perleth, M.; Yeung, P.; Lehm, J.P. Hyperbaric oxygen for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2012, 10, Cd004739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mathieu, D.; Marroni, A.; Kot, J. Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: Recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Diving Hyperb. Med. 2017, 47, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Yıldırım, E.; Murat Özcan, K.; Palalı, M.; Cetin, M.A.; Ensari, S.; Dere, H. Prognostic effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy starting time for sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015, 272, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, Y.; Gao, Y.; Wang, B.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X. Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of Combined Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Am. J. Audiol. 2019, 28, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Xie, S.; Qiang, Q.; Mei, L.; He, C.; Feng, Y.; Sun, H.; Wu, X. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss treated with adjuvant hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2018, 275, 47–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Olex-Zarychta, D. Hyperbaric Oxygenation as Adjunctive Therapy in the Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shi, X. Physiopathology of the cochlear microcirculation. Hear. Res. 2011, 282, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lamm, H.; Klimpel, L. [Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in internal ear and vestibular disorders. Preliminary report]. HNO 1971, 19, 363–369. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kalinec, G.M.; Lomberk, G.; Urrutia, R.A.; Kalinec, F. Resolution of Cochlear Inflammation: Novel Target for Preventing or Ameliorating Drug-, Noise- and Age-related Hearing Loss. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2017, 11, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Goto, F.; Fujita, T.; Kitani, Y.; Kanno, M.; Kamei, T.; Ishii, H. Hyperbaric oxygen and stellate ganglion blocks for idiopathic sudden hearing loss. Acta Otolaryngol. 1979, 88, 335–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Muzzi, E.; Zennaro, B.; Visentin, R.; Soldano, F.; Sacilotto, C. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy as salvage treatment for sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Review of rationale and preliminary report. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2010, 124, e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Kayalı Dinç, A.S.; Çayönü, M.; Boynueğri, S.; Ünsal Tuna, E.; Eryılmaz, A. Is Salvage Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Effective for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Patients with Non-response to Corticostreoid Treatment? Cureus 2020, 12, e6560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chin, C.S.; Lee, T.Y.; Chen, Y.W.; Wu, M.F. Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: Is Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment the Sooner and Longer, the Better? J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12, 1652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mariani, C.; Carta, F.; Catani, G.; Lobina, S.; Marrosu, V.; Corrias, S.; Tatti, M.; Puxeddu, R. Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: Effectiveness of salvage treatment with intratympanic dexamethasone or hyperbaric oxygen therapy in addition to systemic steroids. Front. Neurol. 2023, 14, 1225206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ajduk, J.; Ries, M.; Trotic, R.; Marinac, I.; Vlatka, K.; Bedekovic, V. Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as Salvage Therapy for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. J. Int. Adv. Otol. 2017, 13, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sialakis, C.; Iliadis, C.; Frantzana, A.; Ouzounakis, P.; Kourkouta, L. Intratympanic Versus Systemic Steroid Therapy for Idiopathic Sudden Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2022, 14, e22887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Moon, I.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, S.Y.; Choi, H.S.; Lee, W.S. How long should the sudden hearing loss patients be followed after early steroid combination therapy? Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2009, 266, 1391–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liu, Y.; Jiang, W.; Mao, K.; Chen, Q. The evaluating time of curative effect on sudden deafness. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi 2012, 26, 308–311. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the ISSNHL patients with HBOT. (N = 79).
Table 1. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the ISSNHL patients with HBOT. (N = 79).
CharacteristicStatisticsRange, Min–Max
Age, mean ± SD52.61 ± 12.8225–86
Sex, n (%)
Male42 (53.2%)
Female37 (46.8%)
Side of Hearing Loss, n (%)
Right37 (46.8%)
Left42 (53.2%)
Time interval between onset of symptoms and HBOT, day, median (Q1, Q3)13 (8, 25)1–132
≤7 days17 (21.5%)
8–14 days25 (31.6%)
15–30 days20 (25.3%)
≥31 days17 (21.5%)
Systemic steroid78 (98.7%)
ITSI Reception49 (62.0%)
Associated symptoms
Tinnitus74 (93.7%)
Dizziness30 (38.0%)
Vertigo20 (25.3%)
Comorbidity
Diabetes15 (19.0%)
Hypertension22 (27.8%)
Coronary artery disease5 (6.3%)
The normality of numerical data was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Normally distributed. data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation while non-normally distributed data was expressed as median (Q1, Q3). Categorical data was expressed as frequency and percentage.
Table 2. Comparison of the PTA score/Grade of ISSNHL patients before and after HBOT.
Table 2. Comparison of the PTA score/Grade of ISSNHL patients before and after HBOT.
VariablesBefore HBOTAfter HBOTp-Value
Averaged PTA score dB80.06 ± 21.2660.75 ± 25.94<0.001 a,*
PTA Grade
≤29 dB0 (0%)13 (16.5%)
30–60 dB12 (15.2%)25 (31.6%)
61–80 dB30 (38.0%)26 (32.9%)
≥81 dB37 (46.8%)15 (19.0%)
a Paired-Samples T Test compared the difference of PTA score before and after HBOT. * Indicates the results reached a significant difference between before and after HBOT (p < 0.05).
Table 3. The efficacy of HBOT on improvement of PTA score.
Table 3. The efficacy of HBOT on improvement of PTA score.
VariablesStatisticsRange, Min–Max
ΔPTA score before and after HBOT (dB), median (Q1, Q3)13 (2, 36)−10–60
Overall Improvement, n (%)
Yes44 (55.7%)
ΔPTA = 11–30 dB18 (22.8%)
ΔPTA ≥ 31 dB13 (16.5%)
Final PTA score ≤ 29 dB13 (16.5%)
No
ΔPTA ≤ 10 dB35 (44.3%)
Table 4. Evaluation of the effect of time intervals between the onset and HBOT on PTA score improvement by univariable linear regression analysis. N = 79.
Table 4. Evaluation of the effect of time intervals between the onset and HBOT on PTA score improvement by univariable linear regression analysis. N = 79.
VariablesBetap-Value
Independent
ΔPTA score before and after HBOT (dB)
Dependent
Intervals between the onset and HBOT, days−0.293<0.001 *
Intervals between the onset and HBOT, periods−9.658<0.001 a,*
Period 1: ≤ 7 daysRef -
Period 2: 8–14 days−14.6 b0.009 b,*
Period 3: 15–30 days−19.03 b0.002 b,*
Period 4: ≥ 31 days−31.35 b<0.001 b,*
Represents the difference in PTA score between before and after HBOT. * Indicates the results reached a significant difference (p < 0.05). a shows the statistical result of the association of the difference of PTA score before and after HBOT (ΔPTA) with the periods between the onset and HBOT. b shows the statistical results comparing the indicated group with the Ref group period 1.
Table 5. Analysis of the efficacy of time intervals between the onset and HBOT on PTA score improvement adjusted for other potential variables by multivariate analysis.
Table 5. Analysis of the efficacy of time intervals between the onset and HBOT on PTA score improvement adjusted for other potential variables by multivariate analysis.
VariablesBetap-Value
Outcome
ΔPTA score before and after HBOT (dB)
Variables
Time intervals between the onset and HBOT, days −0.296<0.001 *
Age0.0560.795
Gender, Male to female−2.3150.598
Side of Hearing Loss, Right to Left−4.6880.291
PTA score before HBOT0.1680.150
ITSI Reception2.5840.589
Tinnitus5.5360.539
Dizziness−11.3380.063
Vertigo7.7320.289
Diabetes10.3120.100
Hypertension−9.2000.136
Coronary artery disease−10.9470.302
Δ represents the difference PTA score before and after HBOT. * Indicates the results reached a significant difference (p< 0.05).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.-H.; Chen, Y.-T.; Chou, S.-F.; Lee, L.-C.; Wang, J.-H.; Lai, Y.-H.; Chang, H.-T. Effect of the Timing of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on the Prognosis of Patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Biomedicines 2023, 11, 2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102670

AMA Style

Wang H-H, Chen Y-T, Chou S-F, Lee L-C, Wang J-H, Lai Y-H, Chang H-T. Effect of the Timing of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on the Prognosis of Patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss. Biomedicines. 2023; 11(10):2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102670

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Hsu-Hui, Ya-Ting Chen, San-Fang Chou, Li-Chung Lee, Jia-Hong Wang, Yi-Horng Lai, and Hou-Tai Chang. 2023. "Effect of the Timing of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on the Prognosis of Patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss" Biomedicines 11, no. 10: 2670. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11102670

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop