Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Antibody Pharmacokinetics as Prerequisite for Determining True Efficacy as Shown by Dual Targeting of PD-1 and CD96
Previous Article in Journal
Eltanexor Effectively Reduces Viability of Glioblastoma and Glioblastoma Stem-Like Cells at Nano-Molar Concentrations and Sensitizes to Radiotherapy and Temozolomide
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Microbiome and Metabolomic Profile of the Transplanted Intestine with Long-Term Function
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/biomedicines10092144
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Oral Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Abundance in Subjects in Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention, with or without Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

by
Maria Cristina Curia
1,*,
Pamela Pignatelli
1,2,
Domenica Lucia D’Antonio
1,
Damiano D’Ardes
3,4,
Elena Olmastroni
5,
Luca Scorpiglione
3,4,
Francesco Cipollone
3,4,
Alberico Luigi Catapano
5,6,
Adriano Piattelli
7,8,9,
Marco Bucci
3,4,*,† and
Paolo Magni
5,6,*,†
1
Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, Università degli Studi “Gabriele d’Annunzio” di Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
3
Regional Center for the Study of Atherosclerosis, Hypertension and Dyslipidemia, “SS Annunziata” Hospital—ASL, 66100 Chieti, Italy
4
C.A.S.T., Università degli Studi “Gabriele d’Annunzio” di Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy
5
Epidemiology and Preventive Pharmacology Service (SEFAP), Department of Pharmacological and Biomolecular Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy
6
IRCCS MultiMedica, Sesto S. Giovanni, 20099 Milan, Italy
7
Master Course in Microsurgery in Odontostomatology, Saint Camillus International University for Health Sciences (Unicamillus), 00131 Rome, Italy
8
Fondazione Villaserena per la Ricerca, 65013 Città Sant’Angelo, Pescara, Italy
9
Casa di Cura Villa Serena, 65013 Città Sant’Angelo, Pescara, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(9), 2144; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092144
Submission received: 26 July 2022 / Revised: 24 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Host-Microbiome Crosstalk in Cardiometabolic Diseases)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Low-grade chronic inflammation, promoted by dysbiosis of the gut and oral microbiota, has been shown to contribute to individual susceptibility to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). High oral Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) and lower Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) concentrations have been associated with clinical and experimental atherosclerosis. We assessed oral Pg and Fn abundance in very high-risk patients with previously diagnosed ASCVD, with or without heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH), in subjects with HeFH in primary prevention and in healthy subjects. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 40 patients with previously diagnosed ASCVD (10 with genetically proven HeFH, and 30 without FH), 26 subjects with HeFH in primary prevention, and 31 healthy subjects were selected to quantify oral Pg and Fn abundance by qPCR and assess oral health status. Results: Compared to healthy subjects, patients with previously diagnosed ASCVD showed greater Pg abundance (1101.3 vs. 192.4, p = 0.03), but similar Fn abundance. HeFH patients with ASCVD had an even greater Pg abundance than did non-HeFH patients and healthy subjects (1770.6 vs. 758.4 vs. 192.4, respectively; p = 0.048). No differences were found in the levels of Pg and Fn abundance in HeFH subjects in primary prevention, as compared to healthy subjects. Conclusions: Greater oral Pg abundance is present in very high-risk patients with previously diagnosed ASCVD, with or without FH, suggesting a potential relationship with CV events. Future studies will assess the predictive value of Pg abundance measurement in ASCVD risk stratification.

1. Introduction

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of death in the world [1], and their known risk factors include diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and especially dyslipidemia and chronic low-grade inflammation. Among these factors, hypercholesterolemia, and specifically elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), is an established causative factor for atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) [2]. The susceptibility to CVD reaches a high level of severity in patients with specific genotypes, which results in increased levels of LDL-C throughout their lives, such as familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). This is an autosomal dominant disease caused by mutations of gene encoding for low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (ApoB) or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). The subjects carrying these mutations, even in heterozygosity (HeFH), present a much higher ASCVD risk due to the longstanding LDL-C burden [3,4]. Another high-risk cohort includes subjects with polygenic hypercholesterolemia, consisting of a series of mutations (single-nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) that individually have a lower impact, but which can increase, when added together, the circulating levels of LDL-C. The cumulative impact of these SNPs may be quantified by calculating an LDL-C SNP score [5]. Interestingly, the susceptibility to ASCVD differs among these patients, even when LDL-C levels are similar [6], suggesting that a pathogenetic role for ASCVD may be played by other factors. Among them, chronic low-grade inflammation, via the activation of the nucleotide-binding domain; the leucine-rich containing family, pyrin domain-containing-3 (NLRP3) inflammasome/interleukin 1-β (IL1-β) pathway [7,8] is a very important player, as demonstrated by the CANTOS study [9]. Chronic inflammation is promoted by different conditions, including dysbiosis of the gut and oral microbiota [10,11,12,13]. Evidence that alterations of the former are linked to dyslipidemia, inflammation. and ASCVD are available [14]. For the latter, some studies have shown the association of high concentrations of the odontopathogenic Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) and the commensal and periodontal pathogen Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) and periodontitis with clinical and experimental atherosclerosis [15]. Interestingly, greater subclinical carotid atherosclerosis has been reported to be associated with periodontitis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus [16]. Moreover, periodontitis was found to be a significant risk factor for peripheral and carotid ASCVD in meta-analyses including large populations [17,18,19]. These observations suggest that pathological changes in oral microbiota composition and the related periodontitis may play a role in ASCVD pathophysiology by promoting chronic inflammation, dyslipidemia, including LDL-C oxidation [20], and the reduction of the antiatherogenic properties of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [21], endothelial-cell dysfunction [22], and, possibly, as-yet-unknown, additional pathological processes [23]. Notably, the overall periodontal condition of patients with periodontitis is mirrored by the relative abundance of total subgingival-plaque-specific bacteria in salivary microbiota [24], suggesting the reliability of sampling this latter biological matrix in this context.
To the best of our knowledge, no reports are available on the specific abundance of these bacterial strains in the oral microbiota of patients at high-risk for CVD in secondary CV prevention, with or without HeFH. Thus, in this study, we addressed the question of whether oral dysbiosis, namely, the altered abundance of Pg and Fn, was correlated with previous ASCVD (acute myocardial infarction (MI) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/drug-eluting stent (DES) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), carotid thromboendarterectomy (CEA)), in high-/very high-risk CVD patients, with or without HeFH.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Population

This study had a cross-sectional design and included consecutive patients referred to the Regional Center for the Study of Atherosclerosis, Hypertension and Dyslipidemia (“SS Annunziata” Hospital—ASL Chieti, Italy; C.A.S.T., “G. D’Annunzio” University of Chieti, Italy) from September 2019 to October 2021. The study population included 40 patients (30 patients without HeFH and 10 patients with HeFH,) in secondary ASCVD prevention, as defined by previous MI with/without PCI-DES or double/triple CABG and/or CEA. All of these patients at high risk of CVD were optimally treated with an individual combination of hypocholesterolemic drugs (statins, ezetimibe, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors) at the maximally tolerated dose, according to the most recent guidelines [25], and anti-platelet drugs. When appropriate, other drugs, including anti-hypertensive, β-blockers, and others, were also used. Moreover, 26 sequential HeFH patients in primary CV prevention, treated with hypocholesterolemic drugs (statin, n = 2; statin+ezetimibe, n = 5; statin+PCSK9 inhibitor, n = 4; statin+ezetimibe+PCSK9 inhibitor, n = 8; ezetimibe+PCSK9 inhibitor, n = 1; no therapy, n = 5) were recruited. All HeFH patients received a genetic diagnosis related to their hypocholesterolemic condition. The genetic diagnosis highlighted the presence of causative mutations in heterozygosity, such as mutations on the LDLR, ApoB, or PCSK9 genes, typed according to Lipid inCode analysis results, within the LIPIGEN project [26]. We also enrolled 31 healthy subjects with normal circulating levels of TC and LDL-C (<200 mg/dL and <115 mg/dL, respectively) from recent history (the last 6–12 months) and/or at recruitment. All participants were subjected to a questionnaire about their lifestyle, evaluating alcohol consumption (g/day) and smoking habits (number of cigarettes/day). Their clinical histories have also been carefully assessed, specifically related to the presence of previous adverse cerebrovascular events (CVA), coronary artery disease (CAD) (myocardial infarction or angina), chronic renal failure (CKD), and hypertension (HTN), as well as concomitant medications. Inclusion criteria were as follow: patients in secondary CV prevention (previous MI or PCI) with genetic diagnoses of HeFH; subjects in primary CV prevention with genetic diagnoses of HeFH. Exclusion criteria were as follow: presence of chronic diseases known or detected at screening (except ASCVD), with known gastro-intestinal diseases also related to intestinal dysbiosis. Additionally, we excluded subjects who had undergone antibiotic therapy in the previous 3 months, who were pregnant or breastfeeding, who had systemic pathologies associated with immunological impairment (type 1 diabetes mellitus, organ transplants, or concomitant malignancies), the intake of immunosuppressive drugs, and previous chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy.
The study was performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Provinces of Chieti and Pescara (Italy) (Approval n. 4, dated 25 February 2016). Written, informed consent was obtained from each subject.

2.2. Clinical Procedures

Clinical procedures were performed for all study subjects, who underwent a fasting venous blood sampling and a full clinical examination, including the determination of height, body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (by means of a non-stretchable tape at the umbilical level (standing position), heart rate, and arterial blood pressure. A further investigation was made to assess the oral health of all participants (see below).

2.3. Oral Examination

Oral examination of patients and healthy subjects was performed by a trained dentist (P.P.) using mirrors (MIR3HD, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA), a dental probe (PCP-UNC 15, Hu-Friedy, Chicago, IL, USA), and an intra-oral light. Oral health status was assessed by indices recorded on the standardized Oral Health Questionnaire: number of teeth, plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI). PI and GI were measured on six surfaces (buccal–mesial, mid-buccal, buccal–distal, lingual–mesial, mid-lingual, and lingual–distal) on the Ramfjord teeth (the maxillary right first molar, the maxillary left central incisor, the maxillary left first premolar, the mandibular left first molar, the mandibular right central incisor, and the mandibular right first premolar) with a PCP-UNC 15 probe [27]. The presence of mobile and/or fixed prostheses was recorded with an index from 2 to 0 respectively: 0, absence of prosthesis; 1, single implant/crown or only upper/lower mobile prosthesis; 2, multiple implants/crowns or a double mobile prosthesis.

2.4. Collection of Oral Samples

Oral samples were collected in the morning, 12 h after the last tooth-brushing and 2 h after the last food/liquid intake. All patients and healthy subjects underwent brushing of the middle third dorsum of the tongue by the same operator (dentist, P.P.) under the same conditions. Lingual brushing was performed using a sterile microbrush (Cura Farma, Italy) and was repeated 5 times, following the posterior–anterior direction, reaching 2/3 of the tongue. After sampling, the microbrush was shaken for 30 s, immediately placed in a tube containing 5.0 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and then stored at 4 °C until nucleic acid extraction was performed.

2.5. Clinical Biochemistry

After blood sampling, plasma samples were immediately separated by centrifugation, and aliquots were immediately stored at − 20 °C for subsequent assays. In each plasma sample, TC, TG, HDL-C, apoAI, apoB, Lp(a), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), uric acid, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) isoenzymes were measured according to standard automated clinical procedure. LDL-C was calculated according to the Friedewald formula. Non-HDL-C was calculated as TC minus HDL-C.

2.6. DNA Isolation and Analysis of Oral Bacterial Strains

After the collection of the oral biological samples from patients and healthy subjects, molecular analyses were performed to quantify the following bacterial strains: Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) ATCC 33277 and Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn) ATCC 25586 (LGC Standards S.r.l., Sesto San Giovanni, Milano, Italy) so as to assess the presence of any imbalances in the oral microbial flora. The total genomic DNA from the samples and from the bacterial strains were extracted, as previously reported [28]. Molecular analyses to quantify Pg and Fn abundances in oral samples was performed by qPCR, as previously reported [29].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are presented as medians and interquartile ranges (Q1 and Q3), whereas categorical variables are presented as percentage rates (%). Differences in median values between groups were assessed by a Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test, while a chi-squared test was used to determine independency among categorical variables. Correlations between Pg abundance and Fn abundance with risk factors were assessed using Spearman’s rank coefficient, and the Loess procedure was used to fit a smooth curve to the data, which attempts to capture the general pattern. All tests were 2-sided, and p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All analyses were performed using Statistical Analysis System software, version 9.4 (Statistical Analysis System Institute, Inc, Cary, NC, USA) and R Software, version 4.1.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing c/o Institute for Statistics and Mathematics, 1020 Vienna, Austria). Data retrieval, analysis, and manuscript preparation were solely the responsibility of the authors.

3. Results

3.1. General Characteristics of the Study Cohort

The baseline data of the study cohort are reported in Table 1. The group of patients with previous MI or PCI included both HeFH and non-FH subjects, who were significantly older than healthy subjects (p = 0.001) and were mostly males (females: 22.5%; p = 0.011). They also showed a greater prevalence of being overweight or obese (p = 0.012), compared to healthy subjects. Patients in secondary CVD prevention did not differ from healthy subjects for PI, GI, number of teeth, or presence of prostheses. The healthy subject group included more smokers (19% vs. 5%, p = 0.058) (Table 1).

3.2. Analysis of Pg and Fn Abundance: Correlation with CVD Status

In the whole cohort, Pg abundance was significantly greater in patients with previously diagnosed CVD (p = 0.03) than in healthy subjects, while Fn abundance and Fn/Pg ratio did not differ between groups (Table 2A). After stratification of the secondary CVD prevention cohort according to the presence (or absence) of HeFH, we observed a stepwise increase in Pg abundance among classes, with the subgroup of HeFH patients showing the greatest Pg abundance (p = 0.048) (Table 2B).
Since age, sex, and BMI significantly differed between the healthy subjects group and the CVD patients group (Table 1), we further stratified each group according to these variables. Stratification by age was conducted by taking the age of 60 years, which is the median age of the whole cohort (60 years (54–67)), as the cut-off value. As shown in Table 3, although the Pg abundance median was always greater in CVD patients, whether or not a subject was above 60 years of age, compared to healthy subjects, such a difference did not reach statistical significance. The same situation was observed for Fn abundance and Fn/Pg ratio. Only in those below 60 years of age was the plaque index found to be significantly higher (p = 0.02) in CVD patients than in healthy subjects.
Stratification of the two groups by sex did not allow us to highlight significant differences between healthy controls and CVD patients (Table 4), suggesting that sex is not a confounding factor.
Stratification of the two groups by a BMI less than or equal to/greater than 30 kg/m2 showed that Pg abundance was significantly (p < 0.03) greater in CVD patients with BMIs below this threshold, and thus either of a normal weight or overweight, but not with obesity (Table 5). Such a difference was lost when a BMI was above 30 kg/m2, which could also possibly be due to the small number of subjects in these subgroups.
Based on our results, BMI seems to be a confounding factor for Pg abundance distribution. Thus, we further investigated the correlation between Pg abundance and BMI levels using Spearman’s rank coefficient analysis. In the whole study cohort (including healthy subjects, HeFH subjects in primary CVD prevention, and non-FH patients in secondary CVD prevention), BMI was directly correlated with Pg abundance (R = 0.26, p = 0.012) (Figure 1A). In contrast, BMI was negatively correlated with Fn abundance (R = −0.22, p = 0.028) (Figure 1B).
In addition, Pg abundance remained significantly greater in the whole CVD patient group when smokers in both the healthy subjects and patient groups were excluded (p = 0.03) (Table 6).
A group of HeFH patients in primary prevention (n = 26; age: 53.5 (32–55) years; females: 46%; BMI: 25.2 (22.32–29.06) Kg/m2; smokers: 15.4% (Median (IQR)), followed at the Lipid Clinic for >5 years, were also taken into consideration. Their Pg and Fn abundances was comparable to those of healthy subjects (Pg: 10.5 (0–413.2) vs. 192.4 (0–1364.6), p = 0.41; Fn: 492.9 (280.4–1189.2) vs. 324.2 (34.9–1438.8), p = 0.35, respectively) (Table 7). The Fn/Pg ratio was significantly higher in the HeFH group.

4. Discussion

ASCVD is the result of several concomitant causative factors that are individually associated. In addition to elevated circulating LDL-C levels, whether due to lifestyle factors, polygenic conditions, or monogenic disease, such as HeFH, the pathophysiology of ASCVD also includes chronic low-grade inflammation generated by different components, including oral and gut microbiota changes [30].
In the present study, we explored the abundance of the periodontal pathogenic bacteria Pg and Fn in patients with an established pathological phenotype: previous ASCVD (MI or PCI), with or without HeFH. Patients with ASCVD tended to have more fixed prostheses (crowns and implants) than healthy subjects; this condition indicates previous tooth loss, infections, and caries. The main results suggest that these patients with ASCVD showed a significantly greater Pg abundance, compared to healthy subjects and HeFH subjects in primary prevention, independently of age and sex. Interestingly, having a BMI lower than 30 kg/m2 was associated with greater Pg abundance, possibly indicating a major contribution of related chronic inflammation to ASCVD, while such pro-inflammatory patterns in subjects with obesity may derive from a more complex scenario that may also include the role of dysfunctional adipose tissue and the related adipokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines [31,32]. In the whole study cohort, BMI, another established ASCVD risk factor, was correlated positively with Pg abundance, in agreement with previous reports [33,34], and it was correlated negatively with Fn abundance.
Periodontitis is one of the most prevalent forms of chronic inflammation of the oral cavity and has been reported to be associated with systemic diseases. Specifically, periodontal disease has been linked to an increase in the risk of ASCVD incidence [35]. Periodontal pathogenic bacteria, such as Pg and Fn, can accelerate atheroma formation directly, by entering the circulation and accelerating coronary or aortic atherosclerosis [36,37,38], or indirectly, by disrupted lipoprotein profiles and lipid deposition [30]. In patients with periodontitis, increased levels of proinflammatory lipids and decreased levels of anti-inflammatory lipids were observed [39]. Importantly, periodontitis could increase ASCVD risk, especially in high-risk subjects, such as patients with HeFH.
In the present study, patients with previously diagnosed ASCVD showed a significantly greater Pg abundance, but no differences in Fn abundance were noted, as compared with healthy subjects and HeFH subjects in primary prevention. Interestingly, the observed difference was still present after exclusion of the (few) smokers from both groups. We enrolled consecutive patients; the median age resulted as statistically higher in CVD patients than in healthy subjects. Periodontal disease affects more than 50% of the United States’ population over the age of 30 years, and the anaerobic bacterium Pg is known to be a major player in inducing dysbiosis of the oral microbiome [40]. Given that the median age of both groups, although significantly different, spanned well above the age of 30, we may consider such an age difference as being of no clinical relevance, as shown by comparison analysis. Few data are available regarding the occurrence of sex differences as related to oral odontopathogenic bacteria. While in our study sex did not appear to influence Pg or Fn abundance in any group, it has recently been reported that, in a cohort of young people aged 32 years, a greater proportion of Pg at subgingival sites was present in females as compared to males [41].
Interestingly, in the HeFH subgroup in secondary prevention, a Pg abundance even greater than that of non-HeFH patients with ASCVD was observed. Although it is not possible to causally correlate the currently assessed greater Pg abundance with ASCVD occurrence, one may speculate that the concomitant presence of abundant odontopathogenic strains, such as Pg, if present for years, may have contributed to a further increase in ASCVD risk in subjects with HeFH, which is, per se, a very high-risk, lifelong condition. Supporting this hypothesis, in the HeFH group in primary prevention, no differences in Pg and Fn abundance were found as compared with healthy subjects.
Interestingly, in the whole study cohort, BMI, another well-established ASCVD risk factor, was correlated positively with Pg abundance and negatively with Fn abundance. It has been previously reported that the number of Red Complex oral bacteria, including Pg, was higher in subjects with high BMIs or waist circumferences, independent of periodontitis [30]. A bidirectional relationship between obesity and periodontal disease has also been proposed. Oral bacteria may alter the endocrine functions of brown adipose tissue [42], exacerbate inflammation due to obesity [43], induce weight gain, and increase adipose tissue in diet-induced obesity in mice [44] through endotoxemia and the activation of immune cells. Local inflammation, such as periodontitis, could affect energy regulation, and equally, obesity could exacerbate periodontal disease [45]. Conversely, the amount of Fn was not associated with previous ASCVD and showed an inverse relationship with BMI, thus suggesting that it may not be included among the risk factors for CVD. Any (negative) association of Fn with BMI has not yet been reported, indicating that our observation is novel. Of note, higher proportions of several periodontal pathogens, including Fusobacterium nucleatum ss vincentii, have been reported in obese patients with chronic periodontitis [46]. Oral Pg infection may have played a role in the pathogenesis of CVD by increasing systemic inflammation and deteriorating lipid metabolism, particularly in the context of high-risk patients or HeFH. A similar increase of serum LDL-C would alter the cholesterol component in the cell membrane and cytoplasm of macrophages, which could further affect recognition of Pg by immune cells. Increased production of tumor necrosis-α, interleukin-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and inducible nitric oxide synthase may also facilitate colonization and proliferation of Pg in the oral niche in the hyperlipidemic host [47].
Supporting our data, a relationship between MI and an increase in Pg-targeting antibodies in secondary prevention patients with periodontitis has also been proposed [48]. Conversely, Fn has a reported role in cancer diseases, but it does not appear to have an association with ASCVD [28,49]. In any case, the role of Fn in atherosclerosis and CVD still remains controversial [36,50] and needs further clinical study.
According to the findings of this study, it remains to be established as to whether the increase in Pg abundance observed in ASCVD patients, but not in healthy subjects or patients with HeFH in primary prevention, is likely to be a consequence (almost a “marker”) rather than a cause of ASCVD. Alternatively, this increase in Pg could gradually manifest itself with the deterioration of cardiovascular homeostasis. After all, today we are still wondering how and when Pg intervenes and whether it is actually causative of CVD, or not. Perhaps Pg could have a pathogenic role, possibly accelerating (more than causing) a pathological process that has already been activated, as proposed by Maekawa et al. (“periodontal infection would determine the acceleration of the atherosclerotic process, rather than its genesis, in metabolically susceptible organisms such as ApoE-/-mice” [32]). Therefore, there could be a balance between Pg and Fn abundance: the more labile it is, the worse the oral and cardiovascular health of the subject is. Pg is present at the highest level in HeFH patients—those who are already predisposed to risk, and those who have actually had a CVD event (secondary prevention). Most recruited patients, both in primary and secondary prevention, were on statin treatment, which has been shown to be associated with a lower prevalence of gut microbiota dysbiosis [51]. The question then arises as to whether such treatment may somehow also affect oral microbiota composition.
A limitation of this study is its real-world nature with the recruitment of consecutive ASCVD patients, who did not fully match the healthy controls according to age and sex. These differences have been addressed above. Moreover, the results of the microbiota analysis cannot be retrospectively extended to the previous years of life of the participants, and therefore, any causal relationship between oral microbiome composition and ASCVD cannot be established and may only be hypothesized. According to this study, however, a practical suggestion may be that some oral microbiota analyses might be useful for the accurate initial CVD risk-stratification of specific high-risk subjects, such as those with HeFH. Another limitation of the study, due to the complex multidisciplinary activities associated with the study design, is the relatively limited size of the study cohort, preventing us, for example, from highlighting potential sex differences. Moreover, due to the complex drug treatment regimens of all patients with ASCVD, any potential association between biochemical markers, including lipid markers, and Pg and Fn abundance could not be explored. In this study, we explored the abundance of two components of the oral microbiome, Pg and Fn. Although they are recognized as very relevant in the association with atherosclerosis development, the mapping of a large set of bacterial components of the oral microbiome may provide further insights
In conclusion, taking this study together with the available evidence, the role of Pg as related to the risk of CV events appears to be relevant, while the role of Fn appears to be complex and multifaceted. Based on these observations, as a future perspective, patients in primary prevention could be monitored over time to assess whether any adverse event is preceded by an increase in oral Pg concentration. As a general statement, it is therefore advisable to also implement CVD prevention through periodontal prophylaxis, intensive periodontal therapy, and therapeutic interventions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.C., M.B. and P.M.; methodology, M.C.C., P.P., D.L.D., M.B. and P.M.; software, E.O.; formal analysis, E.O.; investigation, P.P., D.D. and L.S.; resources, F.C., A.L.C. and A.P.; data curation, M.C.C., M.B. and P.M.; writing—original draft preparation, M.C.C., M.B. and P.M.; writing—review and editing, M.C.C., M.B., P.P., A.L.C. and P.M.; supervision, P.M.; funding acquisition, M.C.C., M.B., P.M., F.C. and A.L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by Universita’ degli Studi di Milano (Transition grant PSR2015-1720PMAGN_01; PSR 2021) and by the Ministry of Health-IRCCS MultiMedica GR-2016-02361198 to P.M. The work of A.L.C. is supported by the Fondazione Cariplo 2015-0524 and 2015-0564; H2020 REPROGRAM PHC-03-2015/667837-2; ERANET ER-2017-2364981; PRIN 2017H5F943; Ministry of Health-IRCCS MultiMedica GR-2011-02346974; SISA Lombardia and Fondazione SISA. P.M., E.O., and A.L.C. are supported by the MIUR Progetto di Eccellenza. This study was also partially supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR), Rome, Italy, with funds granted to A.P. and M.C.C.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Provinces of Chieti and Pescara (Italy) (Approval n. 4 dated 25 February 2016).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data will be available upon request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Rossella Grande for her support in the growth of the Pg and Fn bacterial strains and Davide Di Giacomo for editorial support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest, except A.L.C., who has received honoraria, lecture fees, or research grants from Akcea, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Kowa, Mediolanum, Menarini, Merck, Pfizer, Recordati, Sanofi, Sigma Tau, Amryt, and Sandoz.

References

  1. Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs). Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds) (accessed on 22 July 2022).
  2. Ference, B.A.; Ginsberg, H.N.; Graham, I.; Ray, K.K.; Packard, C.J.; Bruckert, E.; Hegele, R.A.; Krauss, R.M.; Raal, F.J.; Schunkert, H.; et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur. Heart J. 2017, 38, 2459–2472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bouhairie, V.E.; Goldberg, A.C. Familial hypercholesterolemia. Cardiol. Clin. 2015, 33, 169–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vallejo-Vaz, A.J.; Stevens, C.A.; Lyons, A.R.; Dharmayat, K.I.; Freiberger, T.; Hovingh, G.K.; Mata, P.; Raal, F.J.; Santos, R.D.; Soran, H.; et al. Global perspective of familial hypercholesterolaemia: A cross-sectional study from the EAS Familial Hypercholesterolaemia Studies Collaboration (FHSC). Lancet 2021, 398, 1713–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Futema, M.; Bourbon, M.; Williams, M.; Humphries, S.E. Clinical utility of the polygenic LDL-C SNP score in familial hypercholesterolemia. Atherosclerosis 2018, 277, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Khera, A.V.; Won, H.H.; Peloso, G.M.; Lawson, K.S.; Bartz, T.M.; Deng, X.; van Leeuwen, E.M.; Natarajan, P.; Emdin, C.A.; Bick, A.G.; et al. Diagnostic Yield of Sequencing Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genes in Severe Hypercholesterolemia. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2016, 67, 2578–2589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Baragetti, A.; Catapano, A.L.; Magni, P. Multifactorial Activation of NLRP3 Inflammasome: Relevance for a Precision Approach to Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk and Disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cicolari, S.; Catapano, A.L.; Magni, P. Inflammaging and neurodegenerative diseases: Role of NLRP3 inflammasome activation in brain atherosclerotic vascular disease. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2021, 195, 111467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bermúdez, V.; Rojas-Quintero, J.; Velasco, M. The quest for immunotherapy in atherosclerosis: CANTOS study, interleukin-1β and vascular inflammation. J. Thorac. Dis. 2018, 10, 64–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Boulangé, C.L.; Neves, A.L.; Chilloux, J.; Nicholson, J.K.; Dumas, M.E. Impact of the gut microbiota on inflammation, obesity, and metabolic disease. Genome Med. 2016, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ascher, S.; Reinhardt, C. The gut microbiota: An emerging risk factor for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Eur. J. Immunol. 2018, 48, 564–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Koren, O.; Spor, A.; Felin, J.; Fåk, F.; Stombaugh, J.; Tremaroli, V.; Behre, C.; Knight, R.; Fagerberg, B.; Ley, R.; et al. Human oral, gut, and plaque microbiota in patients with atherosclerosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108 (Suppl. S1), 4592–4598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kiouptsi, K.; Reinhardt, C. Contribution of the commensal microbiota to atherosclerosis and arterial thrombosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2018, 175, 4439–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tang, W.H.; Kitai, T.; Hazen, S.L. Gut Microbiota in Cardiovascular Health and Disease. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 1183–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bale, B.; Doneen, A.; Vigerust, D. High-risk periodontal pathogens contribute to the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. Postgrad. Med. J. 2017, 93, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zamora-Pasadas, M.; Marfil-Álvarez, R.; González-Bustos, P.; Magán-Fernández, A.; Mesa, F. Periodontitis is associated with higher subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Periodontal. Res. 2022, 57, 479–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zeng, X.T.; Leng, W.D.; Lam, Y.Y.; Yan, B.P.; Wei, X.M.; Weng, H.; Kwong, J.S. Periodontal disease and carotid atherosclerosis: A meta-analysis of 17,330 participants. Int. J. Cardiol. 2016, 203, 1044–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wang, J.; Geng, X.; Sun, J.; Zhang, S.; Yu, W.; Zhang, X.; Liu, H. The risk of periodontitis for peripheral vascular disease: A systematic review. Rev. Cardiovasc. Med. 2019, 20, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kaschwich, M.; Behrendt, C.A.; Heydecke, G.; Bayer, A.; Debus, E.S.; Seedorf, U.; Aarabi, G. The Association of Periodontitis and Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease—A Systematic Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morishita, M.; Ariyoshi, W.; Okinaga, T.; Usui, M.; Nakashima, K.; Nishihara, T.A. Actinomycetemcomitans LPS enhances foam cell formation induced by LDL. J. Dent. Res. 2013, 92, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pussinen, P.J.; Jauhiainen, M.; Vilkuna-Rautiainen, T.; Sundvall, J.; Vesanen, M.; Mattila, K.; Palosuo, T.; Alfthan, G.; Asikainen, S. Periodontitis decreases the antiatherogenic potency of high density lipoprotein. J. Lipid Res. 2004, 45, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Zhang, J.; Xie, M.; Huang, X.; Chen, G.; Yin, Y.; Lu, X.; Feng, G.; Yu, R.; Chen, L. The Effects of. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 766560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Pietiainen, M.; Liljestrand, J.M.; Kopra, E.; Pussinen, P.J. Mediators between oral dysbiosis and cardiovascular diseases. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2018, 126 (Suppl. S1), 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kageyama, S.; Takeshita, T.; Asakawa, M.; Shibata, Y.; Takeuchi, K.; Yamanaka, W.; Yamashita, Y. Relative abundance of total subgingival plaque-specific bacteria in salivary microbiota reflects the overall periodontal condition in patients with periodontitis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0174782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Usova, E.I.; Alieva, A.S.; Yakovlev, A.N.; Alieva, M.S.; Prokhorikhin, A.A.; Konradi, A.O.; Shlyakhto, E.V.; Magni, P.; Catapano, A.L.; Baragetti, A. Integrative Analysis of Multi-Omics and Genetic Approaches—A New Level in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Prediction. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Averna, M.; Cefalù, A.B.; Casula, M.; Noto, D.; Arca, M.; Bertolini, S.; Calandra, S.; Catapano, A.L.; Tarugi, P.; Group, L. Familial hypercholesterolemia: The Italian Atherosclerosis Society Network (LIPIGEN). Atheroscler. Suppl. 2017, 29, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Löe, H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J. Periodontol. 1967, 38, 610–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pignatelli, P.; Iezzi, L.; Pennese, M.; Raimondi, P.; Cichella, A.; Bondi, D.; Grande, R.; Cotellese, R.; Di Bartolomeo, N.; Innocenti, P.; et al. The Potential of Colonic Tumor Tissue. Cancers 2021, 13, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Franciotti, R.; Pignatelli, P.; Carrarini, C.; Romei, F.M.; Mastrippolito, M.; Gentile, A.; Mancinelli, R.; Fulle, S.; Piattelli, A.; Onofrj, M.; et al. Exploring the Connection between. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Maekawa, T.; Takahashi, N.; Tabeta, K.; Aoki, Y.; Miyashita, H.; Miyauchi, S.; Miyazawa, H.; Nakajima, T.; Yamazaki, K. Chronic oral infection with Porphyromonas gingivalis accelerates atheroma formation by shifting the lipid profile. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e20240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Neeland, I.J.; Ross, R.; Després, J.P.; Matsuzawa, Y.; Yamashita, S.; Shai, I.; Seidell, J.; Magni, P.; Santos, R.D.; Arsenault, B.; et al. Visceral and ectopic fat, atherosclerosis, and cardiometabolic disease: A position statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019, 7, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Magni, P.; Dozio, E.; Ruscica, M.; Celotti, F.; Masini, M.A.; Prato, P.; Broccoli, M.; Mambro, A.; Morè, M.; Strollo, F. Feeding behavior in mammals including humans. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1163, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Matsushita, K.; Hamaguchi, M.; Hashimoto, M.; Yamazaki, M.; Yamazaki, T.; Asai, K.; Yamori, M.; Bessho, K.; Toda, H.; Hasegawa, G.; et al. The novel association between red complex of oral microbe and body mass index in healthy Japanese: A population based cross-sectional study. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2015, 57, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Akherati, M.; Shafaei, E.; Salehiniya, H.; Abbaszadeh, H. Comparison of the frequency of periodontal pathogenic species of diabetics and non-diabetics and its relation to periodontitis severity, glycemic control and body mass index. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 2021, 7, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Larvin, H.; Kang, J.; Aggarwal, V.R.; Pavitt, S.; Wu, J. Risk of incident cardiovascular disease in people with periodontal disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Exp. Dent. Res. 2021, 7, 109–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Velsko, I.M.; Chukkapalli, S.S.; Rivera-Kweh, M.F.; Chen, H.; Zheng, D.; Bhattacharyya, I.; Gangula, P.R.; Lucas, A.R.; Kesavalu, L. Fusobacterium nucleatum Alters Atherosclerosis Risk Factors and Enhances Inflammatory Markers with an Atheroprotective Immune Response in ApoE(null) Mice. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Velsko, I.; Chukkapalli, S.; Rivera-Kweh, M.; Zheng, D.; Aukhil, I.; Lucas, A.; Larjava, H.; Kesavalu, L. Periodontal pathogens invade gingiva and aortic adventitia and elicit inflammasome activation in αvβ6 integrin-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 2015, 83, 4582–4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lalla, E.; Lamster, I.; Hofmann, M.; Bucciarelli, L.; Jerud, A.; Tucker, S.; Lu, Y.; Papapanou, P.; Schmidt, A. Oral infection with a periodontal pathogen accelerates early atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-null mice. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2003, 23, 1405–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Koshy, B.; Mahendra, J. The Association between Periodontal Status, Serum Lipid Levels, Lipoprotein Associated Phosholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) in Chronic Periodontitis Subjects and Healthy Controls. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. JCDR 2017, 11, ZC17–ZC21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Simas, A.M.; Kramer, C.D.; Weinberg, E.O.; Genco, C.A. Oral infection with a periodontal pathogen alters oral and gut microbiomes. Anaerobe 2021, 71, 102399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Benn, A.M.L.; Heng, N.C.K.; Thomson, W.M.; Sissons, C.H.; Gellen, L.S.; Gray, A.R.; Broadbent, J.M. Associations of sex, oral hygiene and smoking with oral species in distinct habitats at age 32 years. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2022, 130, e12829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Hatasa, M.; Ohsugi, Y.; Katagiri, S.; Yoshida, S.; Niimi, H.; Morita, K.; Tsuchiya, Y.; Shimohira, T.; Sasaki, N.; Maekawa, S.; et al. Endotoxemia by Porphyromonas gingivalis Alters Endocrine Functions in Brown Adipose Tissue. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 580577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nakarai, H.; Yamashita, A.; Nagayasu, S.; Iwashita, M.; Kumamoto, S.; Ohyama, H.; Hata, M.; Soga, Y.; Kushiyama, A.; Asano, T.; et al. Adipocyte-macrophage interaction may mediate LPS-induced low-grade inflammation: Potential link with metabolic complications. Innate Immun. 2012, 18, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Sasaki, N.; Katagiri, S.; Komazaki, R.; Watanabe, K.; Maekawa, S.; Shiba, T.; Udagawa, S.; Takeuchi, Y.; Ohtsu, A.; Kohda, T.; et al. Endotoxemia by Porphyromonas gingivalis Injection Aggravates Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Disrupts Glucose/Lipid Metabolism, and Alters Gut Microbiota in Mice. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Charupinijkul, A.; Arunyanak, S.; Rattanasiri, S.; Vathesatogkit, P.; Thienpramuk, L.; Lertpimonchai, A. The effect of obesity on periodontitis progression: The 10-year retrospective cohort study. Clin. Oral Investig. 2022, 26, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Maciel, S.; Feres, M.; Gonçalves, T.; Zimmermann, G.; da Silva, H.; Figueiredo, L.; Duarte, P. Does obesity influence the subgingival microbiota composition in periodontal health and disease? J. Clin. Periodontol. 2016, 43, 1003–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lei, L.; Li, H.; Yan, F.; Xiao, Y. Hyperlipidemia impaired innate immune response to periodontal pathogen porphyromonas gingivalis in apolipoprotein E knockout mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Holmlund, A.; Hedin, M.; Pussinen, P.; Lerner, U.; Lind, L. Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) a possible link between impaired oral health and acute myocardial infarction. Int. J. Cardiol. 2011, 148, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Gholizadeh, P.; Eslami, H.; Kafil, H. Carcinogenesis mechanisms of Fusobacterium nucleatum. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 89, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, H.R.; Jun, H.K.; Kim, H.D.; Lee, S.H.; Choi, B.K. Fusobacterium nucleatum GroEL induces risk factors of atherosclerosis in human microvascular endothelial cells and ApoE(-/-) mice. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2012, 27, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Vieira-Silva, S.; Falony, G.; Belda, E.; Nielsen, T.; Aron-Wisnewsky, J.; Chakaroun, R.; Forslund, S.K.; Assmann, K.; Valles-Colomer, M.; Nguyen, T.T.D.; et al. Statin therapy is associated with lower prevalence of gut microbiota dysbiosis. Nature 2020, 581, 310–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Biomedicines 10 02144 g001 550
Figure 1. Correlation between BMI and Pg abundance (panel A) and Fn abundance (panel B) in the whole study cohort.
Figure 1. Correlation between BMI and Pg abundance (panel A) and Fn abundance (panel B) in the whole study cohort.
Biomedicines 10 02144 g001
Table
Table 1. General features of healthy subjects and CVD patients.
Table 1. General features of healthy subjects and CVD patients.
HEALTHY
SUBJECTS		CVD PATIENTS +p-Value
n3140
Age * (years)57 (52–64)66 (60–69)0.001
Female (%)51.6122.50.01
BMI * (kg/m2)23.53 (21.60–27.10)26.6 (24.31–29.99)0.01
Type 2 diabetes mellitus/IGT (n/n)0/015/10
Smoking (%)19.450.06
Plaque index *1 (0.75–1.58)1.28 (1.0–1.4)0.15
Gingival Index *0.75 (0–1)0.5 (0.12–0.775)0.64
Number of Teeth *25 (23–26)22.5 (16.5–26)0.17
Removable denture (%) ** 0.28
083.8767.5
112.927.5
23.2350.07
Fixed prosthesis (%)35.4857.50.07
IGT: impaired glucose tolerance, * Median (IQR), ** Removable denture: 0, absence of prosthesis; 1, single implant/crown or only upper/lower mobile prosthesis; 2, multiple implants/crowns or a double mobile prosthesis. + CVD patient group included 10 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and 30 patients without HeFH.
Table
Table 2. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and (A) all patients with previously diagnosed CVD, and (B) with the non-HeFH subgroup and the HeFH subgroup.
Table 2. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and (A) all patients with previously diagnosed CVD, and (B) with the non-HeFH subgroup and the HeFH subgroup.
A.HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 31)		CVD PATIENTS (All)
(n = 40)		p-Value
Pg abundance *192.38 (0–1364.57)1101.25 (20.18–4945.35)0.03
Fn abundance *324.15 (34.85–1438.78)364.45 (78.91–1368.23)0.70
Fn/Pg *0.22 (0.04–1.57)0.37 (0.04–1.79)0.66
B.HEALTHY
SUBJECTS
(n = 31)		CVD PATIENTS
(excl. HeFH) (n = 30)		CVD PATIENTS
(HeFH Only) (n = 10)		p-Value
Pg abundance *192.38 (0–1364.57)758.35 (0.81–4938.69)1770.58 (531.75–4952)0.048
Fn abundance *324.15 (34.85–1438.78)364.45 (81.04–736.03)360.36 (52.17–3130.65)0.78
Fn/Pg *0.22 (0.04–1.57)0.42 (0.04–3.4)0.34 (0.06–0.51)0.83
* Median (IQR).
Table
Table 3. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and all patients with previously diagnosed CVD according to an age of less than (A) or equal to/greater than (B) 60 years.
Table 3. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and all patients with previously diagnosed CVD according to an age of less than (A) or equal to/greater than (B) 60 years.
A.HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 21)		CVD PATIENTS (All)
(n = 12)		p-Value
Pg abundance *2.90 (0–376.58)411.46 (0–2917.45)0.31
Fn abundance *734.25 (146.37–1772.17)464.96 (116.12–1564.81)0.84
Fn/Pg *0.60 (0.15–2.58)0.49 (0.33–0.93)0.99
Plaque index1 (0.66–1.42)1.58 (1.1–2.04)0.02
B.HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 10)		CVD PATIENTS (All)
(n = 28)		p-Value
Pg abundance *1016.98 (192.38–3813.77)1449.84 (225.96–5514.5)0.73
Fn abundance *131.38 (26.83–447.14)289.84 (78.91–1368.23)0.19
Fn/Pg *0.05 (0.01–0.27)0.13 (0.04–2.81)0.16
Plaque index1.29 (0.75–1.92)1.25 (0.9–1.6)0.86
* Median (IQR).
Table
Table 4. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and all patients with previously diagnosed CVD according to sex ((A), males, and (B) females).
Table 4. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and all patients with previously diagnosed CVD according to sex ((A), males, and (B) females).
A.HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 15)		CVD PATIENTS (All)
(n = 31)		p-Value
Pg abundance *93.24 (0–1364.57)813.79 (19.1–6858.2)0.08
Fn abundance *181.92 (23.74–527.69)384.95 (91.35–2356.73)0.10
Fn/Pg *0.24 (0.13–0.6)0.43 (0.06–1.79)0.88
Plaque index1.33 (0.66–1.67)1.39 (1.08–1.75)0.34
B.HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 16)		CVD PATIENTS (All)
(n = 9)		p-Value
Pg abundance *366.22 (0–1762.26)1462.91 (60.9–3082.05)0.28
Fn abundance *941.78 (37.32–2703.18)208.5 (52.17–467.54)0.24
Fn/Pg *0.14 (0.03–2.58)0.35 (0.03–4.09)0.90
Plaque index1 (0.79–1.5)1 (1–1.11)0.76
* Median (IQR).
Table
Table 5. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and all patients with previously diagnosed CVD according to BMI less than (A) or equal to/greater than (B) 30 kg/m2.
Table 5. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and all patients with previously diagnosed CVD according to BMI less than (A) or equal to/greater than (B) 30 kg/m2.
A.HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 25)		CVD PATIENTS (All)
(n = 30)		p-Value
Pg abundance *27.88 (0–1322.5)1360.39 (19.21–4952)0.03
Fn abundance *527.69 (146.37–1438.78)377.94 (81.04–1781.42)0.98
Fn/Pg *0.42 (0.13–2.58)0.39 (0.05–3.4)0.75
Plaque index1 (0.66–1.42)1.25 (1–1.6)0.08
B.HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 4)		CVD PATIENTS (All)
(n = 10)		p-Value
Pg abundance *1495.12 (582.4–11319.21)741 (223.82–4680.61)0.73
Fn abundance *30.84 (19.13–37.32)266.61 (30.97–667.8)0.10
Fn/Pg *0.02 (0.01–0.04)0.37 (0.04–1.02)0.06
Plaque index1.29 (0.96–1.75)1.35 (1.03–1.75)0.94
* Median (IQR).
Table
Table 6. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and all patients with previously diagnosed CVD, after the exclusion of smokers.
Table 6. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and all patients with previously diagnosed CVD, after the exclusion of smokers.
HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 25)		CVD PATIENTS (All)
(n = 38)		p-Value
Pg abundance *27.88 (0–1322.5)1101.25 (21.15–4952)0.03
Fn abundance *324.15 (34.85–1194.65)364.45 (81.04–1446.59)0.56
Fn/Pg *0.23 (0.04–1.57)0.37 (0.04–1.79)0.72
Plaque index *1.16 (0.75–1.67)1.28 (1–1.67)0.32
* Median (IQR).
Table
Table 7. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and HeFH patients in primary prevention.
Table 7. Pg and Fn abundance: Comparison between healthy subjects and HeFH patients in primary prevention.
HEALTHY SUBJECTS
(n = 31)		HeFH PATIENTS
IN PRIMARY PREVENTION
(n = 26)		p-Value
Pg abundance *192.38 (0–1364.57)10.45 (0–413.2)0.41
Fn abundance *324.15 (34.85–1438.78)492.94 (280.41–1189.15)0.35
Fn/Pg *0.22 (0.04–1.57)3.68 (0.23–37.92)0.03
* Median (IQR).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Curia, M.C.; Pignatelli, P.; D’Antonio, D.L.; D’Ardes, D.; Olmastroni, E.; Scorpiglione, L.; Cipollone, F.; Catapano, A.L.; Piattelli, A.; Bucci, M.; et al. Oral Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Abundance in Subjects in Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention, with or without Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 2144. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092144

AMA Style

Curia MC, Pignatelli P, D’Antonio DL, D’Ardes D, Olmastroni E, Scorpiglione L, Cipollone F, Catapano AL, Piattelli A, Bucci M, et al. Oral Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Abundance in Subjects in Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention, with or without Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(9):2144. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092144

Chicago/Turabian Style

Curia, Maria Cristina, Pamela Pignatelli, Domenica Lucia D’Antonio, Damiano D’Ardes, Elena Olmastroni, Luca Scorpiglione, Francesco Cipollone, Alberico Luigi Catapano, Adriano Piattelli, Marco Bucci, and et al. 2022. "Oral Porphyromonas gingivalis and Fusobacterium nucleatum Abundance in Subjects in Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention, with or without Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia" Biomedicines 10, no. 9: 2144. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10092144

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop