Next Article in Journal
Micro- and Nanosized Carriers for Nose-to-Brain Drug Delivery in Neurodegenerative Disorders
Next Article in Special Issue
The Translational Role of miRNA in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: From Bench to Bedside—A Systematic Literature Review
Previous Article in Journal
Forced Overexpression of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3) Activates Yes-Associated Protein (YAP) Expression and Increases the Invasion and Proliferation Abilities of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Oxidative Stress in the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease and Identification of Risk Factors Using AIP and Castelli Atherogenicity Indicators in Patients with PCOS
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Sex Steroid Receptors in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Endometriosis: Insights from Laboratory Studies to Clinical Trials

Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
Advance Reproductive Centre, Hospital Canselor Tunku Muhriz, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 56000, Malaysia
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu 88400, Malaysia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(7), 1705;
Submission received: 25 June 2022 / Revised: 12 July 2022 / Accepted: 13 July 2022 / Published: 14 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS))


Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and endometriosis are reproductive disorders that may cause infertility. The pathology of both diseases has been suggested to be associated with sex steroid hormone receptors, including oestrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PRs) and androgen receptors (ARs). Therefore, with this review, we aim to provide an update on the available knowledge of these receptors and how their interactions contribute to the pathogenesis of PCOS and endometriosis. One of the main PCOS-related medical conditions is abnormal folliculogenesis, which is associated with the downregulation of ER and AR expression in the ovaries. In addition, metabolic disorders in PCOS are caused by dysregulation of sex steroid hormone receptor expression. Furthermore, endometriosis is related to the upregulation of ER and the downregulation of PR expression. These receptors may serve as therapeutic targets for the treatment of PCOS-related disorders and endometriosis, considering their pathophysiological roles. Receptor agonists may be applied to increase the expression of a specific receptor and treat endometriosis or metabolic disorders. In contrast, receptor antagonist functions to reduce receptor expression and can be used to treat endometriosis and induce ovulation. Understanding PCOS and the pathological roles of endometriosis sex steroid receptors is crucial for developing potential therapeutic strategies to treat infertility in both conditions. Therefore, research should be continued to fill the knowledge gap regarding the subject.

1. Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the most prevalent hormonal disorders among women of reproductive age [1]. This syndrome is a combination of endocrine, metabolic and reproductive disorders that cause irregular menstrual cycles, dyslipidaemia, excessive body weight, oxidative stress, hyperandrogenism and infertility [2,3]. PCOS affects 5–10% of reproductive-aged women, and 40% of those affected experience infertility, making it the primary cause of anovulatory infertility [2]. In clinical practice, three different diagnostic criteria have been proposed for PCOS diagnosis, including the National Institutes of Health Criteria, the Rotterdam Criteria for PCOS and the Androgen Excess Society Criteria [4]. However, the Rotterdam Criteria are the most widely used and acceptable criteria for assessing and managing PCOS. At least two of the following three signs must be present for a diagnosis to be made: loss of ovarian function (oligo-anovulation), excess clinical or biochemical androgen or ultrasound evidence of a polycystic ovary.
Reports on the prevalence of PCOS vary in the literature due to its multisymptomatic nature; strict diagnostic criteria yield a prevalence of 6%, whereas inclusive diagnostic criteria result in a prevalence of up to 20% among reproductive-aged women [5,6]. Within the PCOS population, oligo-anovulation was found in 56.6% of PCOS women, whereas hyperandrogenaemia was found in at least 60% of women with PCOS [3,7]. Other characteristics of reproductive abnormalities following PCOS diagnosis include poor oocyte quality and endometrial receptivity [8]. In addition to reproductive abnormalities, the metabolic nature of PCOS may also increase the risk of other metabolic complications in women, such as hypertension and insulin resistance [9]. Considering its alarming prevalence as the most common endocrine and metabolic disorder in women of reproductive age, elucidating the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of PCOS is of paramount importance.
Endometriosis is a chronic, benign inflammatory disease defined by the presence of dysfunctional extrauterine endometrial tissue. This disease is an oestrogen-dependent condition affecting up to 10% of reproductive-aged women and 35–50% of women with pelvic pain and infertility [10]. Due to its incapacitating symptoms, endometriosis can be a debilitating disease, with symptoms of chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia. Endometriosis has a complicated and multivariate aetiology, and its pathophysiology is described by a number of not-fully-defined theories [11].
The exact pathophysiology of PCOS and endometriosis is still not fully understood. However, research has explored the involvement of sex steroid hormone receptors, such as oestrogen receptors (ERs), progesterone receptors (PRs) and androgen receptors (ARs) in PCOS and endometriosis [12,13]. Furthermore, current studies on the structural malformation and associated malfunction of these receptors have triggered a new avenue for understanding PCOS and endometriosis aetiology. In this review, we will critically appraise and discuss recent advancements in understanding of the roles of sex steroid receptors in mediating the pathophysiology of PCOS and endometriosis.

2. Characteristics of Sex Steroid Receptors

2.1. Structure

Oestrogen receptors (ERs) were originally thought to exist only as nuclear receptors with two identified isoforms, namely ERα and ERβ [14]. Later findings revealed that oestrogen could also bind and activate the membrane-bound G-protein-coupled receptor, namely G-protein oestrogen receptor (GPER), acknowledging the existence of two classes of ER. [15] Nevertheless, GPER binds oestrogen with less binding affinity than the two other nuclear ERs. All three ERs are encoded by distinct genes located in different chromosomes. ERα is a 67 kDa protein comprising 595 amino acids from the ESR1 gene on chromosome 6. ERβ protein comprises 530 amino acids, with an approximate molecular weight of 59 kDa, with the gene encoding GPER located on chromosome 7 [16]. Various isoforms of each ER also exist due to selective splicing of transcripts. Three ERα isoforms, including ERα66, ERα36 and ERα46, have been identified. These isoforms differ in terms of the binding domain segments that are available to bind with DNA or transcription factors. The four identified isoforms for ERβ are ERβ2, ERβ3, ERβ4 and ERβ5, which all have variants in the C terminus and do not bind to oestrogen ligands [17]. A conformational change occurs upon binding oestradiol (E2) to ERα or ERβ in the cytoplasm, inducing dimerisation of the receptor. This complex is translocated to the nucleus, which binds to chromatin at the ERE sequences and alters the transcription of target genes by recruiting transcription factors [16]. Moreover, rapid responses to oestrogen mediated by GPER involve the mobilisation of various secondary messengers, such as cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and calcium ions (Ca2+), or the activation of intracellular kinase pathways. These observations show that GPER can mediate these immediate effects to activate various signal transduction cascades, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), protein kinase C and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) [18].
From a single gene located on chromosome 11, the human progesterone receptor (hPR) gene can be expressed as two distinct nuclear receptor isoforms: PR-A (94 kDa) and PR-B (116 kDa) [19]. The difference in the molecular weight is due to PR-A lacking 164 of the PR-B amino acids at the N terminal [20]. Progesterone binding to either PR-A or PR-B triggers homogeneous or heterogeneous dimerisation of the receptors. These dimerised complexes translocate into the nucleus and act as transcription factors that activate various subsets of genes. The variability of these combinations allows for the execution of distinct transcriptional functions and is considered a reflection of the progesterone effects [21].
In contrast, the androgen receptor (AR) is one of the 49 members of the steroid receptor family of ligand-activated transcription factors [22]. The AR gene, which is 90 KB in size, is located on the X chromosome and yields a 110 kDa nuclear receptor that can bind to only testosterone and dihydrotestosterone [23]. Other hormones, such as androstenedione (A4), dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate, act as prohormones that must be converted into testosterone before they can bind to AR and produce androgenic effects [24].

2.2. Distribution

Historically, oestrogen, progesterone and testosterone (androgen) have been known to exert effects exclusive to the development of the primary and secondary sexual organs. However, as research progresses and increased understanding is obtained, these hormones have been found to have wide-ranging effects as they travel throughout the body via the bloodstream. Figure 1 shows the distribution of sex steroid hormone receptors in males and females. Tissue-specific effects of sex hormones depend on the expression of their corresponding receptors in the tissues. Moreover, agonists and antagonists for the receptors are clinically relevant because they can exert different activation or inhibition effects and tissue-specific functions, depending on which tissue the receptors are expressed.
From radiolabelled-oestradiol binding assays to precise molecular techniques, such as PCR, detection of ER expression has allowed scientists to identify the target tissues where oestrogen has exerted its effects. Other than sex organ-related tissues, such as the prostate, ovaries and placenta, ER was also found to be expressed in the heart, bone, liver, lungs and adipose tissue [25]. To date, the role of ER in each target tissue has been substantially studied and discussed in a plethora of peer-reviewed publications. Hormone replacement therapy is one of the benefits derived from sex steroid receptor research. In addition, phytoestrogens and synthetic estrogenic compounds have been proven to be effective substitutes for impaired oestrogen production [26].
Similarly, the advancement of molecular biology has also allowed for the characterisation of PR expression profiles in many reproductive and non-reproductive tissues. Reproductive tissues expressing PR include the uterus, ovary and placenta, whereas non-reproductive tissues that express PR include the stomach lining, liver, pancreas, kidney, bladder, pituitary gland and adrenal gland [27].
Moreover, documented reports still restrict AR expression to tissues associated with sexual dimorphism articulation. These tissues include muscle, fat and bone tissues, where androgens can influence their growth and development to produce gender-specific characteristics. Additionally, studies on the role of AR in the nervous system suggest the hypothesis that postnatal activation of AR is responsible for potentiating specific aspects of male behaviour [28].

2.3. Physiological Functions

Sex steroid receptors are involved in regulating many essential functions of the body. For example, ER is involved in reproductive functions (follicular and endometrial development) and metabolic regulation (energy, glucose and lipid homeostasis), whereas PR is vital in reproduction (endometrial development), neuroprotection and metabolic regulation during pregnancy. In contrast, AR is involved in follicular and endometrial growth.

2.3.1. Oestrogen Receptors

In follicular development, oestrogen receptors (ERs) are expressed specifically in the granulosa cells (GCs) and theca cells (TCs) of the ovarian follicles. TCs are stimulated by luteinising hormone (LH), resulting in the synthesis of androgens. Some of the androgens bind to AR, whereas others spread to GCs. In GCs, androgens are converted into oestrogens, mainly in the form of oestradiol (E2) under the stimulation of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Increased levels of E2 bind to ERα, ERβ and GPER, which further increases the production of LH, leading to a surge of LH in GCs and TCs [29]. This condition stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of GCs and TCs, which is the final stage of follicle development, followed by the ovulation stage [30].
In endometrial development, ERα is present in the endometrial epithelial and stromal cells of the endometrium, ERβ is present in the glandular epithelial cells and GPER is localised in the plasma membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum. Increased levels of these receptors are observed during the proliferative stage under the stimulation of rapid endometrium growth by E2 [31]. As the primary mediator of oestrogenic action, the expression of ERα is higher than that of ERβ during the early proliferative stage [32]. Moreover, the expression of GPER is stimulated by E2 via ERα [33]. The binding of E2 to these receptors regulates the growth and proliferation of the endometrium. The expression of ERα, ERβ and GPER was found to peak in the late proliferative stage but decrease in the secretory phase, as oestrogen secretion decreased with the development of the corpus luteum and increased progesterone secretion [34].
In energy homeostasis, ERα, ERβ and GPER can be found in the cardiac [35] and skeletal muscles [36]. They are located in the nucleus, plasma membrane and mitochondria and act as nuclear receptors, transcription factors and signalling molecules for metabolic regulation, respectively [37]. Energy regulation in muscle tissues depends on the interaction between oestrogen and ER to modulate mitochondrial functions, such as ATP and reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, antioxidant defences and mitochondrial biogenesis [38]. Translocation of the E2/ER complex into the nucleus occurs when oestrogen in the form of E2 binds to ERα and ERβ. Transcription of mitochondrial genes, Pgc-1α and NRFS occurs during interactions between the E2/ER complex and nuclear DNA [39,40]. These genes are involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, fatty acid utilisation and antioxidant defences [41]. E2 can also bind to GPER at the plasma membrane. This binding activates a series of intracellular signalling pathways, including PI3K, MAPK, extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and c-Jun-NH2-terminal protein kinase. These pathways are responsible for the transcription of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes, which further increases the antioxidant defences of the mitochondria [42]. As the primary ER isoform present in the mitochondria, ERβ binds to chaperone HSP27 and stabilises it [43]. Erβ is also involved in regulating mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) transcription and replication and expressing respiratory-chain proteins by binding to the mtDNA [38]. In cardiac muscles, healthy mitochondrial function is essential to protect the heart from injury. GPER activation provides a protective effect on the heart after ischemia–reperfusion injury by inhibiting PTP opening via the ERK signalling pathway [44]. In addition, activation of ERβ protects the heart from trauma-induced haemorrhage by activating the mitochondrial biogenesis transcriptional cascade and inhibiting the mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway [45]. In skeletal muscles, normal mitochondrial homeostasis is crucial for muscle function and regeneration after injury. Activation of ERα by E2 regulates the expression of enzymes involved in fatty acid metabolism and increases the capacity of skeletal muscles to utilise fatty acids [46]. Activation of ERβ and GPER inhibits mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and mtDNA damage, respectively, caused by oxidative stress in the skeletal muscles [47].
In glucose homeostasis, ERα and ERβ are present in pancreatic β cells that produce, store and release insulin crucial for glucose homeostasis. E2 exerts its glucose homeostasis effect by binding to ERα and ERβ, increasing the biosynthesis and secretion, respectively, of insulin to control blood glucose levels [48]. In addition to insulin secretion, activation of ERα and ERβ by E2 can also promote the survival of pancreatic β cells under persistent cellular stresses, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, cytokine-induced inflammation and glucolipotoxicity [49]. In lipid homeostasis, E2 binds to ERα and ERβ to modulate the central pathways involved in lipid metabolism, which includes lowering the levels of circulating lipids; reducing the expression of lipogenic and proinflammatory genes; and increasing the expression of lipid oxidation genes in the adipose tissues, liver and skeletal muscles [50]. As another ER class, GPER acts cooperatively with ERα and ERβ in mediating metabolic effects on glucose and lipid homeostasis through similar or distinct mechanistic pathways, respectively. Studies show that mice lacking either ERα, ERβ or GPER share similarities in terms of specific metabolic phenotypes, such as decreased insulin sensitivity, defective glucose and lipid homeostasis and increased adiposity [51].
Co-operative interaction between the two classes of receptors is essential to ensure that compensatory effects occur in the chronic absence of either one of the receptors. In glucose homeostasis, GPER activation by E2 stimulates the activation of the ERK signalling pathway, positively affecting insulin secretion. Furthermore, GPER activation simultaneously stimulates the PI3K pathway, inhibiting insulin secretion. Consequently, the two opposing pathways balance insulin secretion to maintain optimum blood glucose levels in the body [52]. In lipid homeostasis, activation of GPER helps co-ordinate lipid oxidation and prevent its accumulation in the liver and adipose tissues. This activation can be achieved by suppressing the expression of transcription factors responsible for lipogenesis, such as chSREBP and SREBP1, via the STAT3 signalling pathway. This phenomenon reduces lipotoxicity and has an antiapoptotic effect on adipocytes [53]. Lipid accumulation can also be prevented by promoting the differentiation of preadipocytes into adipocytes, as shown by the upregulation of GPER expression during the process. GPER activation prevents cell cycle arrest of preadipocytes by increasing the expression of cell cycle regulating factors, such as cyclin D, CDK4 and CDK6. Increased expressions of these factors then induces adipocyte differentiation [54].

2.3.2. Progesterone Receptors

Progesterone receptor (PR) plays a more critical role in female reproduction than ER, especially in endometrial development for pregnancy. Before embryo implantation, PR-A and PR-B are present in the endometrial luminal epithelium during the proliferative phase. They both increase in accordance with the rising level of progesterone and decreasing oestrogen. During the ovulation phase, PR-A decreases, whereas PR-B remains constant, indicating the role of PRB in glandular secretion [55]. Progesterone binding to PR-B triggers the production of prostaglandins and cytokines attributed to the inflammatory-like characteristics of ovulation [49]. Following ovulation, fertilisation and progressive development of the zygote into activated blastocyst occur. Simultaneously, the corpus luteum is formed, and ovarian steroid hormone biosynthesis shifts from oestrogen to progesterone production. Moreover, the predominant PR-A in the endometrial stromal cells binds to progesterone and stimulates the proliferation of the stromal cells. Activation of PR-A by progesterone also suppresses the oestrogen-induced proliferation of endometrial epithelial cells, changing it into a differentiated state for embryo attachment and invasion.
The underlying fibroblastic stromal cells undergo proliferation and differentiation into epithelioid decidual cells, a process mediated by PR-A, after embryo attachment [56]. Decidual cells provide an immunotolerant microenvironment for the implanted embryo, protect it from physiological stressors and prevent excessive embryonic invasion into the uterine compartment [57]. Progesterone-driven decidualisation depends on the expression ratio of PR-A and PR-B. A ratio favouring PR-B mediates the anti-inflammatory effects of progesterone based on the influx of uterine natural killer cells (uNKCs). uNKC is essential to promote an immunosuppressive milieu for the invading hemiallogeneic conceptus. These cells also promote the remodelling of spiral arterioles to facilitate endovascular trophoblast invasion, which ultimately forms the endotheliochorial placenta [58]. Conversely, a ratio favouring PR-A mediates the proinflammatory effects of progesterone. This phenomenon occurs when uNKC prevents excessive trophectodermal invasion into the uterine compartment by triggering apoptosis of the advancing trophoblastic cellular front of invading conceptus [59]. Progesterone-dependent uterine receptivity and decidualisation represent a critical step in ensuring pregnancy success. Therefore, as mediators of this process, maintaining the regular expression of PR-A and PR-B isoforms is important. The absence of either one would lead to infertility or other complications, such as miscarriage [60].
PR-A and PR-B can also be localised in different parts of the brain, including the hypothalamus, hippocampus and cortex. PR-A and PR-B activations by progesterone mediate neuroprotection effects on the brain via activation of the MAPK, ERK and Akt signalling pathways [61]. These neuroprotective effects include myelination, glial cell functions, inflammation and neurogenesis [62]. Progesterone binding to PR-A and PR-B induces myelin production on glial cells and helps slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease [63]. Progesterone helps to correct and maintain neuronal homeostasis after traumatic brain injury through PR-A and PR-B [64]. Moreover, progesterone may protect against cerebral oedema and secondary neuronal death caused by traumatic brain injury. Furthermore, activation of PR-A and PR-B may inhibit the inflammatory cytokines IL-β and TNF-α in the frontal cortex of the traumatic brain injury, preventing cerebral oedema by stabilising the blood–brain barrier and inhibiting water, ions and inflammatory molecules from crossing the blood–brain barrier [65]. In addition, progesterone-driven activation of PR-A and PR-B can upregulate the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, a neurotrophin in the central nervous system that functions to reduce mitochondrial dysfunction in the brain, offering another layer of protection against brain injury [61].
As the body adapts to pregnancy, progesterone and PR mediate various metabolic regulations to ensure sufficient nutrient supply for maternal and foetal needs. Thus, PR can be found in the pancreatic β-cells, adipose tissue, liver and skeletal muscles. Progesterone can regulate carbohydrate metabolism through PR by inducing hyperinsulinemia on pancreatic islets while promoting glycogen storage in the liver. PR activation in glucose metabolism promotes the transcription of gluconeogenic genes and increases blood glucose levels under insulin-resistant conditions [66]. Through the hepatic PR, progesterone also activates glycogen phosphorylase, an enzyme involved in glycogen metabolism, increasing blood glucose levels [46]. Several pregnancy studies have reported that high progesterone levels and PR expression correlate with incidents of gestational diabetes characterised by glucose intolerance due to inadequate insulin supply [66,67]. Another study showed that PR knockout female mice have high glucose tolerance and low fasting blood sugar due to increased pancreatic β-cell mass and proliferation [68]. This finding suggests that PR expression and progesterone have adverse effects on insulin production.
In contrast, progesterone exerts a catabolic effect on lipid metabolism through PR by inhibiting lipolysis and promoting lipid storage in the adipose tissue and skeletal muscles. This effect is demonstrated in PR-expressing pregnant rat adipocytes, wherein lipolysis is inhibited [69]. The actions of progesterone and PR on metabolism during pregnancy are well-studied. However, the exact involvement of each isoform PR-A and PR-B in these regulations and the interaction between the two isoforms remain unclear.

2.3.3. Androgen Receptor

Despite being a male sex hormone, androgen and androgen receptors (ARs) play an equally important role in female reproduction, especially in follicle and uterine development. AR expression can be detected in the ovary [70], fallopian tubes [71] and endometrium [72] throughout the menstrual cycle, which is consistent with the role of androgen in modulating the follicle cycle and uterine development. Furthermore, an experiment involving the generation of a transgenic AR reporter mouse, which expresses a luciferase reporter gene under the control of activated endogenous AR, showed high AR activity in the uterus and ovaries, proving the direct action of androgen in these tissues [73]. TCs produce androgens under the stimulation of LH during the early stage of the menstrual cycle. Part of the androgen binds to AR in the TCs, whereas some parts spread to GCs to be converted into oestrogen. The remaining unconverted androgen in the GCs binds to AR in the GCs. AR activation in the TCs and GCs stimulates the proliferation and differentiation of the cells into mature follicles [29]. Evidence has shown intense AR expression in TCs and GCs during the early/mid proliferative stage [70]. AR detection in primate ovaries is most abundant in immature follicles [74]. ARs also demonstrate FSH interactions during early follicular development, as proven by the increased AR expression by FSH in primary follicles. A positive correlation was also observed between AR expression and FSHR mRNA levels in GCs isolated from normal, androgen or FSH-treated primates [75]. AR expression in the ovaries decreases as the follicles mature during the later stage of follicular development [76].
The highest levels of AR expression are observed in the endometrial stromal cells within the upper functional layer of cells during the oestrogen-dominated proliferative stage of uterine development. AR was also found to be present in the basal layer of the stromal cells throughout the cycle [72]. This finding indicates the involvement of androgen in stimulating the proliferation of endometrial stromal cells through AR activation. As the process progresses, AR expression is upregulated in the glandular epithelium during the mid/late secretory phase when progesterone decreases due to the demise of the corpus luteum [72]. This finding, again, indicates the involvement of AR in the maintenance of the endometrium.

3. Sex Steroid Receptors in PCOS and Endometriosis

PCOS patients may be associated with the conditions of abnormal folliculogenesis, metabolic disorders and anovulation [77,78,79]. These conditions are related to changes in the expression of sex steroid receptors. Figure 2 demonstrates the association of receptor expression changes with abnormal folliculogenesis and endometriosis pathogenesis.

3.1. Abnormal Folliculogenesis in PCOS

Abnormal folliculogenesis refers to the failure of the ovarian follicle to mature into a functional ovum. The remaining undegenerated cystic follicle after ovulation failure leads to cysts in the ovary [80].
Disruption of ER expression plays a significant role in ovulation dysfunction associated with PCOS. In vitro studies showed that mice with altered ERα genes developed a PCOS-like phenotype, which is characterised by high circulating LH, haemorrhagic ovaries and cystic, non-ovulating follicles [81]. Similarly, another in vitro study comparing the mRNA and protein levels of ERα and ERβ in GCs and TCs between normal and polycystic ovaries demonstrated that ER expression is higher in GCs than in TCs for polycystic ovaries. In contrast, ERβ expression remained the same in GCs and TCs for both ovaries [82]. This finding indicates that impaired follicle development and anovulation are more related to the aberrant expression of ERα than ERβ. Moreover, ER knockout rats that fail to express functional ERα have polycystic ovaries, ovulation defects and uterine dysplasia. They also demonstrate prominent abnormalities in female genital development, fertility and response to E2 [83]. A human case study reported a female patient with a homozygous mutation in the ESR1 gene responsible for ERα expression with a small uterus and ovarian cysts [84]. Surprisingly, another in vitro study showed that abnormal expression of ERβ in mouse ovaries can also cause follicular development failure [85]. In addition to abnormal follicular development, ERβ knockout mice are also observed to have decreased ovulation ability [86]. Furthermore, a study showed that ERβ knockout mice have early atretic follicles and few corpora lutea, despite their preserved reproductive ability [87].
On the contrary, another publication reported that ERβ knockout mice display poor fertility due to low ovulation frequency, few pregnancies and reduced preovulatory follicle differentiation, all of which are attributed to weak response to FSH [88]. In addition to ER, another oestrogen-binding receptor, GPER, plays a significant role in the abnormal folliculogenesis associated with PCOS. High levels of GPER expression are detected in the cumulus GCs of PCOS patients, inhibiting oocyte maturation [89]. In contrast, an in vitro study showed that the growth of carp (Cyprinus carpio) oocytes during the final stage is significantly decreased when incubated with GPER agonist G-1 [90]. Moreover, research involving GPER small interfering RNA knockdown mice indicates that GPER has exerts a decisive inhibitory action on primordial follicles, proving its role in obstructing oocyte maturation [63].
Most women diagnosed with PCOS present with hyperandrogenism; thus, disruption in AR expression is also implicated in abnormal folliculogenesis and anovulation [91]. AR knockout mice exhibit subfertility [92]. Subfertility in mice is associated with a lack of androgen activity and low expression of AR in the GCs, which leads to a prolonged oestrous cycle and an increased number of preantral and atretic follicles with decreased corpora lutea and ovulation rates [92]. In a study on the expression of AR in luteinised GCs from 169 Chinese women (106 PCOS and 63 normal) aged between 20 and 35 years, qRT-PCR analysis revealed that AR mRNA expression in GCs of PCOS patients was significantly lower compared with normal women (p-value < 0.001). Furthermore, the levels of AR expression are low in PCOS patients with a significant number of antral follicles [12]. However, an inconsistency regarding the influence of different AR expression levels on PCOS abnormal folliculogenesis is observed. For instance, another in vivo study reported that AR is highly expressed in PCOS animal models due to induction by androgen, suggesting an association between PCOS and hyperandrogenism [89]. To explain this phenomenon, the authors of [12] hypothesised that AR expression might be increased by short androgen stimulation in vivo and in vitro. Afterwards, the expression of AR might be inhibited due to the increased activity of AR in a chronic hyperandrogenism environment of PCOS. This condition inhibits the normal development of the follicles, as AR expression decreases during folliculogenesis, leading to the formation of numerous large antral follicles in the ovaries of PCOS patients. Nonetheless, abnormal folliculogenesis in PCOS is associated with the abnormal expression of AR, regardless of overexpression or underexpression.

3.2. Metabolic Disorders in PCOS

Metabolic disorders commonly experienced by PCOS patients include obesity, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and hypertension. The pathophysiology of these conditions is often associated with disruption of the normal expression of sex steroid receptors. For example, abnormal expression of ER and GPER is associated with obesity, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Previous discussions indicated that ER and GPER are responsible for lipid homeostasis; thus, changes in their expression affect the lipid metabolism of the body. Excess lipid accumulation increases body weight, leading to obesity. Reports have also indicated that mice lacking ERα, ERβ and GPER have increased body weight and visceral adiposity compared to wild-type mice with intact ERα and ERβ [93]. Increased adiposity is also observed in ER and GPER knockout mice. Results revealed an overall increase in lipid content in the body of ER and GPER knockout mice, with increased lipid deposition in the subcutaneous and visceral fat depots. Weight gain in the mice was also correlated with a significant increase in circulating cholesterol levels, triglycerides and low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) [50]. This phenomenon suggests that ER and GPER expression disruption impedes lipid metabolism, leading to obesity.
Similarly, impaired glucose regulation is also caused by abnormal expressions of ER and GPER. Deletion of ERα, ERβ and GPER in mice increases the severity of insulin-deficient diabetes compared with wild-type mice [94]. Moreover, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperglycaemia, loss of pancreatic β-cells and decreased pancreatic insulin levels can be detected in mice without ERα, ERβ and GPER [95]. This condition indicates that normal blood glucose levels cannot be maintained without the expression of ER and GPER, thus increasing the susceptibility of individuals to diabetes mellitus. Importantly, ER disruption can also cause cardiovascular diseases due to mitochondrial alterations in the cardiomyocytes. Quantitative proteomic analysis of cardiac mitochondria from an ERα knockout rat showed a significant reduction in mitochondrial proteins involved in electron transport chain (ETC), oxidative phosphorylation, regulation of oxidative stress and apoptosis, and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism [96]. Consequently, the activity of ETC complexes and the capacity for calcium handling decrease, and mitochondrial membrane lipid peroxidation in the cardiac muscles increases [97]. Moreover, ATP synthesis is driven by complex 1 and decreases as stress-induced ROS production increases in the cardiac mitochondria [98]. Cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis becomes obstructed as oxidative stress increases. This condition results in the death of cardiomyocytes, leading to myocardial infarction [99]. In addition to the lack of ERα expression, the inactivation of GPER may also cause mitochondrial alterations in cardiomyocytes through the downregulation of PGC-1α, which is the gene responsible for mitochondrial biogenesis. This condition is associated with concentric cardiac hypertrophy in menopausal women [100].
In addition to ER, abnormal expressions of AR are associated with obesity and diabetes mellitus in PCOS. Hyperandrogenism is one of the phenotypes associated with PCOS [91]. Thus, increased androgen activity mediated through elevated AR expression negatively affects lipid and carbohydrate metabolism. A study reported that ewes treated with androgen displayed several metabolic dysregulations, such as abolishing increments in visceral fat, pronounced adipocyte hypertrophy, fatty liver and hyperlipidaemia [101]. Similarly, metabolic abnormalities, including constraints on adipocyte maturation, diminished adipocyte release of adiponectin, increased intra-abdominal fat storage and hyperlipidaemia, are observed in a normal-weight PCOS patients with elevated androgen and AR expression [102]. All these abnormalities may lead to obesity. Increased AR expression in PCOS also causes dysregulation in hepatic glycogen in the absence of insulin resistance, leading to hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus [103]. Furthermore, hypertension is positively correlated with AR expression. Reports have indicated that androgen administration to female rats for three months invokes multiple cardiometabolic features, such as increased blood pressure, food intake, adiposity and renal injury [104]. The blood pressure of rats treated with androgen was found to be higher than that of untreated rats [105]. A study proved that the activation of the intrarenal renin-angiotensin system induces blood pressure elevation in PCOS, which is mediated by androgen via AR [106]. Another study reported that the blockade of AR reduces blood pressure and decreases renal angiotensin type 1 receptor mRNA expression in female PCOS rats [107]. All these findings confirm the pathophysiological role of AR in PCOS-linked hypertension.

3.3. Endometriosis

Endometriosis is a benign gynaecological disease whereby endometrial tissue is dispersed outside the uterus on the peritoneum, ovaries, bladder, rectovaginal septum or intestines. This disease may cause pain due to altered pelvic structure and extensive adhesions, leading to infertility in severe cases. Common symptoms of endometriosis in pelvic pain, dyspareunia and dysmenorrhoea [108].
One of the factors leading to endometriosis is the accumulation of oestrogen and activation of ER and GPER. Oestrogen accumulation occurs in the endometriotic tissues due to the high expression of aromatase and steroidogenic acute regulatory protein, the two enzymes responsible for the conversion of cholesterol into E2 [109]. The binding of excess E2 to overexpressed ER and GPER stimulates the proliferation of endometriosis-like lesions [85]. An experiment using ERα and ERβ knockout mice models to induce the growth of endometriosis-like lesions suggested that ERα and ERβ are associated with disease progression [110]. Similarly, increased GPER expression in women with endometriosis suggests the involvement of GPER in the disease [111]. Overexpression of ERα is associated with cell adhesion, proliferation and neoangiogenesis, which supports the growth of endometriosis-like lesions [110]. Elevated expression of ERβ is related to the inhibition of TNF-induced apoptosis and the increment of IL-1β secretion, which contributes to cell survival, proliferation, invasion and adhesion of immortalised human endometrial cells. Additionally, overexpression of ERβ leads to endometriosis-associated infertility because it inhibits the decidualisation response in the stromal cells of the endometrium [112]. In contrast, overexpression of GPER in the secretory endometrial epithelium is associated with the continued proliferation of shed endometrial cells in the peritoneal cavity [113]. A study by [114] detected a significant increase in the expression levels of ERα and ERβ in the endometriotic lesion in comparison with normal endometria. Another study revealed that the expression of ERβ mRNA increased by 34-fold in human endometriotic tissues compared with normal endometria [115]. Another study reported that the expression of ERβ mRNA increases by 34-fold in human endometriotic tissues compared with normal endometria [115]. Abnormally elevated GPER expression is observed in the eutopic and ectopic endometrium of women with endometriosis [113]. Additionally, analysis of macrophages obtained from peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis shows a positive correlation between the expression of Erβ and proinflammatory cytokines in women both with and without endometriosis, whereas the expression of ERα positively correlates with selective cytokine production in women with endometriosis only [116].
In addition to ER and GPER, the dysregulation of PR expression is also related to endometriosis [117]. Progesterone resistance is hypothesised to induce the initiation of endometriosis development, as several studies have reported impaired progesterone action in the endometrium [117]. Evidence suggests that PR-B expression is either absent or high, whereas PR-A expression is notably downregulated in the superficial peritoneal lesions and ovarian endometriomas [118]. PR-A is the predominant PR isoform because PR-B deficiency is prominent in lesions [117]. However, in deep rectal lesions, PR-A and PR-B expression can be detected in the glands and stroma, albeit at significantly lower levels than in normal endometria [119]. PR-mediated progesterone signalling exerts antimitogenic effects on the endometrial epithelial cells, which is essential for the mitigation of trophic oestrogen effects on normal endometrium and ectopic implants of endometriosis [56]. However, the absence or underexpression of PR-A and PR-B disrupts normal progesterone antimitogenic signalling, resulting in the development of endometriosis.

4. Potential Therapeutic Routes

One of the viable treatments for medical conditions experienced female patients with PCOS is the administration of selective receptor modulators, which control the activity of sex steroid receptors. The modulators can act as either agonists or antagonists to a specific receptor. A summary of potential treatment routes for PCOS-related disorders is shown in Figure 3.

4.1. Receptor Agonist

A receptor agonist is a receptor ligand that activates a biological response upon binding to a specific receptor.
Prinaberel (ERB-041) is an example of an ER agonist; it functions to restore the expression of ERβ. A study showed its effectiveness not only in restoring or augmenting ERβ expression in murine squamous cell carcinoma and human carcinoma cells but also in reducing proliferation and inducing differentiation and apoptosis in skin carcinogenesis [120]. The capability of prinaberel to reduce the proliferation of cancerous cells suggests its suitability as a therapeutic agent for endometriosis. Moreover, prinaberel has anti-inflammatory properties, which it exerts by suppressing the NFκB proinflammatory signalling pathway, which is responsible for the transcription of various proinflammatory genes, such as inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), p65 protein, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), IL-6 and IL-1β [120]. Furthermore, a study showed significant inhibitions of iNOS production in peritoneal macrophages of endometriosis following treatment with prinaberel [63]. In another study using a mouse endometriosis model to evaluate the efficacy of prinaberel in treating endometriosis, endometriotic lesions were generally regressed in 40–75% of the mice following prinaberel treatment [87]. This finding proves the anti-inflammatory benefits of prinaberel and its effectiveness in reducing lesions associated with endometriosis. However, several adverse events, such as headache, nausea, bronchitis and infection, were reported following prinaberel treatment [121]. Therefore, using prinaberel requires caution.
G-1 is an example of a selective receptor agonist for GPER, functioning to activate GPER expression. Treatment of an obese mouse model with increased adiposity using a G-1 agonist has been shown to attenuate overall weight gain and lipid content in mice. Furthermore, a significant reduction in the mass of multiple fat depots and increased energy expenditure in the brown adipose tissue without any adverse effect on bone mineral density and content or lean mass following G-1 treatment are observed [122]. Moreover, G-1 therapy improved glucose regulation in ovariectomised mice, as demonstrated by low levels of fasting glucose and insulin, increased insulin sensitivity, improved glucose tolerance, and reduced circulating proinflammatory cytokines and hormones (leptin and resistin). Low fasting glucose and insulin levels prove the beneficial effects of G-1 agonists on glucose regulation. Furthermore, this finding implies the direct role of G-1 in the regulation of glucose production and uptake in the liver and skeletal muscles, respectively [123]. Therefore, this phenomenon indicates that G-1 agonist may be a suitable therapeutic candidate to treat GPER-induced obesity and reduce lipid deposition or even alleviate chronic diseases related to obesity, such as diabetes mellitus.

4.2. Receptor Antagonist

A receptor antagonist is a receptor ligand that blocks a biological response upon binding to a specific receptor. For example, different antagonists for the sex hormone receptors, namely ER, PR and AR, have been developed to treat medical conditions caused by receptor dysregulation.
PHTPP, oxabicycloheptene sulfonate (OBHS) and SR-16234 are examples of effective ER antagonists for endometriosis treatment. PHTPP exhibits antagonistic activity against ERβ. Additionally, PHTPP reduces ERβ expression, which enables the suppression of TNF activity, reducing the onset of endometriosis. The treatment of surgically-induced endometriosis lesions in mice with PHTPP was reported to successfully suppress ectopic lesion growth [112]. A significant reduction in endometriotic lesion size was also observed in a baboon endometriosis model following PHTPP treatment [124]. In contrast, OBHS exerts antagonistic effects on Erα, resulting in potent antiestrogenic and anti-inflammatory impacts on endometriotic lesions by regulating the level of ERα expression. Moreover, OBHS has been proven effective in reducing inflammation at the site of endometriotic lesions in a suture endometriosis mouse model, as well as on in vitro primary human endometriotic stromal cells [125]. SR-16234 exhibits ERα antagonistic activity coupled with a partially weak ERβ agonist activity. SR-16234 can suppress the expression of genes associated with inflammation in endometriosis-like lesions, such as TNF-α and IL-1β, preventing the growth and proliferation of endometriotic tissues. A study also demonstrated the effectiveness of SR-16234 in suppressing the growth of endometriosis-like lesions in a murine model of endometriosis. The results show that treatment SR-16234 significantly reduced the level of proinflammatory cytokines, namely TNF-α and IL-1β, in the endometriosis-like lesions [126].
Clomiphene citrate, which acts as a receptor antagonist for ER, is usually used for ovulation induction. Clomiphene citrate has two isomers, namely zuclomiphene and enclomiphene, which compete for receptor-binding sites with endogenous oestrogen. Zuclomiphene can induce ovulation and has a longer half-life than enclomiphene. The mechanism of action of clomiphene citrate involves inhibition of negative oestrogen feedback to the hypothalamus and pituitary gland by blocking ER. In addition, increased secretion of gonadotropins from the anterior pituitary can stimulate follicular development and ovulation [127]. Treatment of PCOS patients with a 50–150 mg daily oral dose of clomiphene for five days beginning on day 3–5 after automatic withdrawal bleeding significantly reduced ovulation time by an average of 30 days and simultaneously increased the ovulation rates [128]. Clomiphene citrate is associated with an increased risk of multiple pregnancies, despite its effectiveness in improving ovulation [129]. Evidence shows that approximately 14% of female patients develop three or more follicles, despite receiving low doses of clomiphene citrate as treatment [130]. In addition to the increased risk of multiple pregnancies, other common but transient side effects reported for clomiphene citrate include headaches, blurred vision, hot flashes and mood changes [131]. The reported side effects are often mild. Thus, clomiphene citrate remains the first-line therapy for ovulation induction to treat infertility in PCOS patients.
G-15 is an example of a GPER antagonist. It is often used as a manipulating tool to inhibit the expression of GPER during in vitro experiments by examining the effects of GPER inhibition on the changes of important elements for specific biological processes. For instance, G-15 was used in an experiment with the aim of confirming whether inhibition of GPER expression affects insulin secretion and proves the involvement of GPER in insulin regulation [132]. Another study with the aim of studying the involvement of GPER in calcium ion regulation also utilised G-15 as a GPER-manipulating tool [133]. G-15 exhibits excellent antagonistic activity on GPER because it can effectively inhibit GPER expression in various cell types, such as rat myometrial cells [133] and mouse insulinoma MIN6 cells. A recent study featured the use of G-15 for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer induced by oestrogen through GPER activation. Results of the study demonstrated that G-15 successfully decreases the expression of GPER protein in the A549 and H1793 carcinoma cell lines [55]. Based on its effectiveness in inhibiting GPER, G-15 might serve as a suitable candidate for treatment of PCOS-associated conditions caused by overexpressions of GPER, such as abnormal folliculogenesis and endometriosis.
Vilaprisan is an example of a PR antagonist with a strong binding affinity to PR. It is a common therapeutic option for uterine fibroids [134]. Heavy menstrual bleeding and pelvic pain are two of the most common symptoms of uterine fibroids. Studies have proven vilaprisan to be effective in suppressing menstrual bleeding and pelvic pain in uterine fibroids [135,136]. Moreover, vilaprisan treatment significantly decreased mean average oestradiol and mean maximum progesterone concentrations compared to pretreatment [136]. Vilaprisan was selected as a potential treatment for endometriosis due to its effectiveness in suppressing pelvic pain. An ongoing phase II clinical trial is being conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of doses (2 and 4 mg for 24 weeks) of vilaprisan in treating women with symptomatic endometriosis. This research, which measures the changes in the worst pelvic pain from the baseline as the primary outcome, is expected to be completed on 17 August 2022 [137]. However, several adverse events are associated with vilaprisan treatment, including ovulation inhibition, increased follicle size, headache, endometrial disorders (inhomogeneous/cystic endometrium), ovarian cysts, cervical cancer cysts, haemorrhagic ovarian cysts, proteinuria, nausea, hot flashes and dizziness. Most of the side effects are mild, and normal ovulatory cycles resume immediately after vilaprisan treatment; however, ovulation inhibition remains a major problem associated with this treatment [138]. Therefore, an ovulation-stimulating drug may be used as an adjuvant for vilaprisan in PCOS treatment, especially for patients who desire to conceive.
Flutamide is a common AR antagonist used to treat conditions associated with PCOS, such as hirsutism, anovulation and hyperlipidaemia. Flutamide is the most widely used and reported AR antagonist. This drug has a favourable effect in reducing hirsutism and acne amongst PCOS patients [139]. PCOS patients also reported improved menstrual cycle regularity and ovulation following flutamide treatment. These patients recorded decreased luteinising hormone and increased oestrone, as well as oestradiol and 17-hydroxyprogesterone levels [140]. Another study stated that flutamide treatment improved obesity outcomes in female patients with PCOS lipid profiles. The results showed a significant decrease in total cholesterol, LDL and triglycerides amongst obese PCOS patients [141]. However, the use of flutamide can lead to hepatotoxicity, despite its effectiveness in relieving PCOS-associated conditions. This phenomenon represents a major setback in the application of PCOS treatment.

5. Limitations

Several limitations of this review are worth highlighting. One limitation is the inclusion of additional in vitro and in vivo studies, which mainly include results on cell lines and animals. In addition, clinical trials involving human subjects included in this review are limited due to ethical restrictions, especially when isolating specimens (i.e., GCs of small antral follicles from normal women to analyse the expression level of sex hormone receptors). Therefore, animals (such as mice and rats) or cell lines (such as endometrial cells) are the study subject for most research involving reproduction and sex hormone receptors. Despite the convenience and cost-saving aspect of using small animal models, the physiological differences between animals and humans may not accurately represent the exact biological response experienced in humans. For example, only the PR-A isoform was necessary for establishment of pregnancy in a murine model, whereas PR-A and PR-B isoforms were equally crucial for human pregnancy [142,143]. Therefore, studying pathophysiological processes involving complicated signalling pathways, such as PCOS, which affects the regulation of different sex hormone receptors, is challenging using only animal models and cell lines.
Many knowledge gaps still exist with respect to sex hormone receptors due to the difficulties in obtaining a suitable study subject. For instance, the changes and interactions between PR-A and PR-B in metabolic regulation during pregnancy are still not fully understood, despite research conducted over a long period. The interaction between AR and PR in mediating endometrial effects in endometriosis pathogenesis remains unclear due to contradictory findings in different publications [144,145]. Furthermore, the therapeutic approach using receptor agonists/antagonists has been proven effective in relieving some of the symptoms of PCOS. However, the appearance of side effects following treatment indicates that a considerable amount of information regarding the receptors should be explored through extensive research.
We realise that the nature of our review as a narrative review that does not include a systematic methodology for choosing articles may have caused us to overlook relevant studies. Future research could adopt a methodical strategy for manuscript selection to enhance our findings.

6. Recommendations

The interaction between the three sex hormone receptors, namely ER, PR and AR, which regulate metabolic homeostasis, pregnancy establishment and menstrual cycle, respectively, is complicated. In addition to extensive research, a suitable experimental model should be used to study their complex interactions. Animal models that share common physiological features with humans, such as primates, should be frequently used to ensure proximity to actual human physiological responses. This condition allows for remarkably accurate discovery regarding PCOS pathogenesis and other conditions regulated by the sex hormone receptors, especially PR- and AR-mediated regulations, which are less well-studied than ER-mediated regulation. For instance, extensive research should be conducted to uncover the role of PR-A and PR-B in metabolic regulation during pregnancy. Furthermore, detailed structures and conformations of receptors and their agonists or antagonists should be studied because these pieces of information are essential for manipulating the receptors and their respective agonists/antagonists. By interfering with the structures and conformation of the receptors and their agonists/antagonists, side effects associated with treatments of receptor agonists/antagonists could be eradicated while simultaneously ensuring their potency. The safety and efficacy of the receptor agonists and antagonists should be tested thoroughly in the short and long term to confirm that they are safe to be used as therapeutic agents.

7. Conclusions

PCOS and endometriosis are medical conditions associated with infertility in women. Abnormal folliculogenesis and metabolic disorders, including obesity, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and hypertension, are phenotypes associated with PCOS. These PCOS phenotypes, as well as endometriosis, are caused by dysregulation of sex hormone receptors, namely ER, PR and AR. Therefore, these receptors could be potential targets for PCOS and endometriosis treatments. The expression of ER, PR and AR can be regulated by their respective agonists or antagonists. Hence, receptor agonists and antagonists may serve as potential therapeutic routes for the management of PCOS and endometriosis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.H.M., F.A.H. and M.A.A.; methodology, M.H.M., F.A.H. and D.A.M.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.M., F.A.H. and D.A.M.K.; writing—review and editing, M.H.M., F.A.H., M.A.A., A.K.A.K., M.F.A. and N.H.A.A.; visualisation, F.A.H. and D.A.M.K.; supervision, M.H.M., F.A.H., M.A.A., A.K.A.K., M.F.A. and N.H.A.A.; funding acquisition, M.H.M. and M.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research was funded by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (grant number FRGS/1/2018/SKK08/UKM/03/2), and the APC was funded by UKM.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


The authors would like to thank Azantee Yazmie binti Abdul Wahab from the Department of Biomedical Science, Kulliyyah of Allied Health Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) for guidance in writing skills.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Azziz, R.; Carmina, E.; Chen, Z.; Dunaif, A.; Laven, J.S.; Legro, R.S.; Lizneva, D.; Natterson-Horowtiz, B.; Teede, H.J.; Yildiz, B.O. Polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2016, 2, 16057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Swaroop, A.; Jaipuriar, A.S.; Gupta, S.K.; Bagchi, M.; Kumar, P.; Preuss, H.G.; Bagchi, D. Efficacy of a Novel Fenugreek Seed Extract (Trigonella foenum-graecum, Furocyst) in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS). Int. J. Med. Sci. 2015, 12, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Teede, H.; Deeks, A.; Moran, L. Polycystic ovary syndrome: A complex condition with psychological, reproductive and metabolic manifestations that impacts on health across the lifespan. BMC Med. 2010, 8, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Carmina, E. Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome: From NIH criteria to ESHRE-ASRM guidelines. Minerva Ginecol. 2004, 56, 6. [Google Scholar]
  5. Gupta, M.; Singh, D.; Toppo, M.; Priya, A.; Sethia, S.; Gupta, P. A cross sectional study of polycystic ovarian syndrome among young women in Bhopal, Central India. Int. J. Community Med. Public Health 2018, 5, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sirmans, S.M.; Pate, K.A. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Azziz, R.; Carmina, E.; Dewailly, D.; Diamanti-Kandarakis, E.; Escobar-Morreale, H.F.; Futterweit, W.; Janssen, O.E.; Legro, R.S.; Norman, R.J.; Taylor, A.E. Criteria for defining polycystic ovary syndrome as a predominantly hyperandrogenic syndrome: An androgen excess society guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2006, 91, 4237–4245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Fauser, B.C.; Tarlatzis, B.C.; Rebar, R.W.; Legro, R.S.; Balen, A.H.; Lobo, R.; Carmina, E.; Chang, J.; Yildiz, B.O.; Laven, J.S. Consensus on women’s health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): The Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 97, 28–38.e25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Glintborg, D.; Andersen, M. An update on the pathogenesis, inflammation, and metabolism in hirsutism and polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2010, 26, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sourial, S.; Tempest, N.; Hapangama, D.K. Theories on the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis. Int. J. Reprod. Med. 2014, 2014, 179515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Signorile, P.G.; Viceconte, R.; Baldi, A. New Insights in Pathogenesis of Endometriosis. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 879015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gao, X.-Y.; Liu, Y.; Lv, Y.; Huang, T.; Lu, G.; Liu, H.-B.; Zhao, S.-G. Role of Androgen Receptor for Reconsidering the “true” polycystic ovarian Morphology in pcos. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Xu, X.-L.; Deng, S.-L.; Lian, Z.-X.; Yu, K. Estrogen Receptors in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Cells 2021, 10, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Dai, X.; Xiang, L.; Li, T.; Bai, Z. Cancer hallmarks, biomarkers and breast cancer molecular subtypes. J. Cancer 2016, 7, 1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Barton, M.; Filardo, E.J.; Lolait, S.J.; Thomas, P.; Maggiolini, M.; Prossnitz, E.R. Twenty years of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER: Historical and personal perspectives. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2018, 176, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Fuentes, N.; Silveyra, P. Estrogen receptor signaling mechanisms. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2019, 116, 135–170. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hua, H.; Zhang, H.; Kong, Q.; Jiang, Y. Mechanisms for estrogen receptor expression in human cancer. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2018, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Luo, J.; Liu, D. Does GPER really function as a G protein-coupled estrogen receptor in vivo? Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vasquez, Y.; DeMayo, F. Role of nuclear receptors in blastocyst implantation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013, 24, 724–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kastner, P.; Krust, A.; Turcotte, B.; Stropp, U.; Tora, L.; Gronemeyer, H.; Chambon, P. Two distinct estrogen-regulated promoters generate transcripts encoding the two functionally different human progesterone receptor forms A and B. EMBO J. 1990, 9, 1603–1614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Grimm, S.L.; Hartig, S.M.; Edwards, D.P. Progesterone Receptor Signaling Mechanisms. J. Mol. Biol. 2016, 428, 3831–3849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tsai, M.-J.; O’Malley, B.W. Molecular mechanisms of action of steroid/thyroid receptor superfamily members. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994, 63, 451–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zeng, X.; Xie, Y.-J.; Liu, Y.-T.; Long, S.-L.; Mo, Z.-C. Polycystic ovarian syndrome: Correlation between hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance and obesity. Clin. Chim. Acta 2020, 502, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Burger, H.G. Androgen production in women. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 77, 3–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hutson, D.D.; Gurrala, R.; Ogola, B.O.; Zimmerman, M.A.; Mostany, R.; Satou, R.; Lindsey, S.H. Estrogen receptor profiles across tissues from male and female Rattus norvegicus. Biol. Sex Differ. 2019, 10, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Desmawati, D.; Sulastri, D. Phytoestrogens and their Health Effect. Open Access Maced. J. Med. Sci. 2019, 7, 495–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Asavasupreechar, T.; Saito, R.; Miki, Y.; Edwards, D.P.; Boonyaratanakornkit, V.; Sasano, H. Systemic distribution of progesterone receptor subtypes in human tissues. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2020, 199, 105599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mhaouty-Kodja, S. Role of the androgen receptor in the central nervous system. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 465, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hughes, C.H.; Murphy, B.D. Nuclear receptors: Key regulators of somatic cell functions in the ovulatory process. Mol. Asp. Med. 2021, 78, 100937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Richards, J.S.; Pangas, S.A. The ovary: Basic biology and clinical implications. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Prossnitz, E.R.; Barton, M. The G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPER in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011, 7, 715–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Enmark, E.; Pelto-Huikko, M.; Grandien, K.; Lagercrantz, S.; Lagercrantz, J.; Fried, G.; Nordenskjöld, M.; Gustafsson, J.-A.K. Human estrogen receptor β-gene structure, chromosomal localisation, and expression pattern. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1997, 82, 4258–4265. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Lecce, G.; Meduri, G.; Ancelin, M.; Bergeron, C.; Perrot-Applanat, M. Presence of estrogen receptor β in the human endometrium through the cycle: Expression in glandular, stromal, and vascular cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 1379–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Punyadeera, C.; Verbost, P.; Groothuis, P. Oestrogen and progestin responses in human endometrium. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 84, 393–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pugach, E.K.; Blenck, C.L.; Dragavon, J.M.; Langer, S.J.; Leinwand, L.A. Estrogen receptor profiling and activity in cardiac myocytes. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 431, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wiik, A.; Hellsten, Y.; Berthelson, P.; Lundholm, L.; Fischer, H.; Jansson, E. Activation of estrogen response elements is mediated both via estrogen and muscle contractions in rat skeletal muscle myotubes. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2009, 296, C215–C220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Klinge, C.M. Estrogens regulate life and death in mitochondria. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2017, 49, 307–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Simpkins, J.W.; Yang, S.-H.; Sarkar, S.N.; Pearce, V. Estrogen actions on mitochondria—physiological and pathological implications. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2008, 290, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Hsieh, Y.-C.; Yang, S.; Choudhry, M.A.; Yu, H.-P.; Rue, L.W., III; Bland, K.I.; Chaudry, I.H. PGC-1 upregulation via estrogen receptors: A common mechanism of salutary effects of estrogen and flutamide on heart function after trauma-hemorrhage. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circ. Physiol. 2005, 289, H2665–H2672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Mattingly, K.A.; Ivanova, M.M.; Riggs, K.A.; Wickramasinghe, N.S.; Barch, M.J.; Klinge, C.M. Estradiol stimulates transcription of nuclear respiratory factor-1 and increases mitochondrial biogenesis. Mol. Endocrinol. 2008, 22, 609–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Witt, H.; Schubert, C.; Jaekel, J.; Fliegner, D.; Penkalla, A.; Tiemann, K.; Stypmann, J.; Roepcke, S.; Brokat, S.; Mahmoodzadeh, S. Sex-specific pathways in early cardiac response to pressure overload in mice. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 86, 1013–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Boland, R.; Vasconsuelo, A.; Milanesi, L.; Ronda, A.C.; de Boland, A.R. 17β-Estradiol signaling in skeletal muscle cells and its relationship to apoptosis. Steroids 2008, 73, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Vasconsuelo, A.; Milanesi, L.; Boland, R. Participation of HSP27 in the antiapoptotic action of 17β-estradiol in skeletal muscle cells. Cell Stress Chaperones 2010, 15, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Bopassa, J.C.; Eghbali, M.; Toro, L.; Stefani, E. A novel estrogen receptor GPER inhibits mitochondria permeability transition pore opening and protects the heart against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2010, 298, H16–H23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Hsieh, Y.-C.; Yu, H.-P.; Suzuki, T.; Choudhry, M.A.; Schwacha, M.G.; Bland, K.I.; Chaudry, I.H. Upregulation of mitochondrial respiratory complex IV by estrogen receptor-β is critical for inhibiting mitochondrial apoptotic signaling and restoring cardiac functions following trauma–hemorrhage. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2006, 41, 511–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Campbell, S.; Febbraio, M. Effect of ovarian hormones on mitochondrial enzyme activity in the fat oxidation pathway of skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. -Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 281, E803–E808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Vasconsuelo, A.; Milanesi, L.; Boland, R. Actions of 17β-estradiol and testosterone in the mitochondria and their implications in aging. Ageing Res. Rev. 2013, 12, 907–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cerf, M.E. Beta cell dysfunction and insulin resistance. Front. Endocrinol. 2013, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Kumar, P.; Sait, S.F. Luteinizing hormone and its dilemma in ovulation induction. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2011, 4, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sharma, G.; Hu, C.; Brigman, J.L.; Zhu, G.; Hathaway, H.J.; Prossnitz, E.R. GPER deficiency in male mice results in insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and a proinflammatory state. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 4136–4145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Prossnitz, E.R.; Hathaway, H.J. What have we learned about GPER function in physiology and disease from knockout mice? J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 153, 114–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Longuet, C.; Broca, C.; Costes, S.; Hani, E.H.; Bataille, D.; Dalle, S.P. Extracellularly regulated kinases 1/2 (p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinases) phosphorylate synapsin I and regulate insulin secretion in the MIN6 β-cell line and islets of Langerhans. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 643–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Mauvais-Jarvis, F. Estrogen and androgen receptors: Regulators of fuel homeostasis and emerging targets for diabetes and obesity. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 22, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Zhu, P.; Yuen, J.M.; Sham, K.W.; Cheng, C.H. GPER mediates the inhibitory actions of estrogen on adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells through perturbation of mitotic clonal expansion. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2013, 193, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, Y.-X.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.-Y.; Liu, X.-M.; Wang, X.-X.; Zhang, C.-L.; Hao, C.-F.; Deng, S.-L. Regulation of follicular development and differentiation by intra-ovarian factors and endocrine hormones. Front. Biosci. 2019, 24, 983–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Patel, B.; Elguero, S.; Thakore, S.; Dahoud, W.; Bedaiwy, M.; Mesiano, S. Role of nuclear progesterone receptor isoforms in uterine pathophysiology. Hum. Reprod. Update 2015, 21, 155–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Gellersen, B.; Brosens, J.J. Cyclic decidualisation of the human endometrium in reproductive health and failure. Endocr. Rev. 2014, 35, 851–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Wilkens, J.; Male, V.; Ghazal, P.; Forster, T.; Gibson, D.; Williams, A.; Brito-Mutunayagam, S.; Craigon, M.; Lourenco, P.; Cameron, I. Bleeding in women and are suppressed by uterine NK cells regulate endometrial the progesterone receptor modulator asoprisnil. J. Immunol. 2013, 191, 2226–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Tan, H.; Yi, L.; Rote, N.S.; Hurd, W.W.; Mesiano, S. Progesterone receptor-A and-B have opposite effects on proinflammatory gene expression in human myometrial cells: Implications for progesterone actions in human pregnancy and parturition. J. Clin. Endocrinol. 2012, 97, E719–E730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cha, J.; Sun, X.; Dey, S.K. Mechanisms of implantation: Strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 1754–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Stein, D. Wright DW, Kellermann AL. Does progesterone have neuroprotective properties. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2008, 51, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Cooke, P.S.; Nanjappa, M.K.; Yang, Z.; Wang, K.K. Therapeutic effects of progesterone and its metabolites in traumatic brain injury may involve non-classical signaling mechanisms. Front. Neurosci. 2013, 7, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Wang, J.M.; Irwin, R.W.; Liu, L.; Chen, S.; Brinton, R.D. Regeneration in a degenerating brain: Potential of allopregnanolone as a neuroregenerative agent. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 2007, 4, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Siddiqui, A.N.; Siddiqui, N.; Khan, R.A.; Kalam, A.; Jabir, N.R.; Kamal, M.A.; Firoz, C.K.; Tabrez, S. Neuroprotective role of steroidal sex hormones: An overview. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2016, 22, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Wyse Jackson, A.C.; Roche, S.L.; Byrne, A.M.; Ruiz-Lopez, A.M.; Cotter, T.G. Progesterone receptor signalling in retinal photoreceptor neuroprotection. J. Neurochem. 2016, 136, 63–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Lee, S.R.; Choi, W.-Y.; Heo, J.H.; Huh, J.; Kim, G.; Lee, K.-P.; Kwun, H.-J.; Shin, H.-J.; Baek, I.-J.; Hong, E.-J. Progesterone increases blood glucose via hepatic progesterone receptor membrane component 1 under limited or impaired action of insulin. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rebarber, A.; Istwan, N.B.; Russo-Stieglitz, K.; Cleary-Goldman, J.; Rhea, D.J.; Stanziano, G.J.; Saltzman, D.H. Increased incidence of gestational diabetes in women receiving prophylactic 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm delivery. Diabetes Care 2007, 30, 2277–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Picard, F.; Wanatabe, M.; Schoonjans, K.; Lydon, J.; O’Malley, B.W.; Auwerx, J. Progesterone receptor knockout mice have an improved glucose homeostasis secondary to β-cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 15644–15648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Boonyaratanakornkit, V.; Pateetin, P. The role of ovarian sex steroids in metabolic homeostasis, obesity, and postmenopausal breast cancer: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic implications. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, 140196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Saunders, P.T.; Millar, M.R.; Williams, K.; Macpherson, S.; Harkiss, D.; Anderson, R.A.; Orr, B.; Groome, N.P.; Scobie, G.; Fraser, H.M. Differential expression of estrogen receptor-α and-β and androgen receptor in the ovaries of marmosets and humans. Biol. Reprod. 2000, 63, 1098–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Horne, A.W.; King, A.E.; Shaw, E.; McDonald, S.E.; Williams, A.R.; Saunders, P.T.; Critchley, H.O. Attenuated sex steroid receptor expression in fallopian tube of women with ectopic pregnancy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2009, 94, 5146–5154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Marshall, E.; Lowrey, J.; MacPherson, S.; Maybin, J.A.; Collins, F.; Critchley, H.O.; Saunders, P.T. In silico analysis identifies a novel role for androgens in the regulation of human endometrial apoptosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, E1746–E1755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Dart, D.A.; Waxman, J.; Aboagye, E.O.; Bevan, C.L. Visualising androgen receptor activity in male and female mice. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e71694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Hillier, S.G.; Tetsuka, M.; Fraser, H.M. Location and developmental regulation of androgen receptor in primate ovary. Hum. Reprod. 1997, 12, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Weil, S.; Vendola, K.; Zhou, J.; Bondy, C.A. Androgen and follicle-stimulating hormone interactions in primate ovarian follicle development. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 2951–2956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Astapova, O.; Minor, B.M.; Hammes, S.R. Physiological and pathological androgen actions in the ovary. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 1166–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Shang, K.; Jia, X.; Qiao, J.; Kang, J.; Guan, Y. Endometrial abnormality in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Reprod. Sci. 2012, 19, 674–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dennett, C.C.; Simon, J. The role of polycystic ovary syndrome in reproductive and metabolic health: Overview and approaches for treatment. Diabetes Spectr. 2015, 28, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Hager, M.; Wenzl, R.; Riesenhuber, S.; Marschalek, J.; Kuessel, L.; Mayrhofer, D.; Ristl, R.; Kurz, C.; Ott, J. The Prevalence of Incidental Endometriosis in Women Undergoing Laparoscopic Ovarian Drilling for Clomiphene-Resistant Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Isobe, N.; Yoshimura, Y. Deficient proliferation and apoptosis in the granulosa and theca interna cells of the bovine cystic follicle. J. Reprod. Dev. 2007, 53, 1119–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Hamilton, K.J.; Arao, Y.; Korach, K.S. Estrogen hormone physiology: Reproductive findings from estrogen receptor mutant mice. Reprod. Biol. 2014, 14, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  82. Jakimiuk, A.J.; Weitsman, S.R.; Yen, H.W.; Bogusiewicz, M.; Magoffin, D.A. Estrogen receptor alpha and beta expression in theca and granulosa cells from women with polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002, 87, 5532–5538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Rumi, M.K.; Dhakal, P.; Kubota, K.; Chakraborty, D.; Lei, T.; Larson, M.A.; Wolfe, M.W.; Roby, K.F.; Vivian, J.L.; Soares, M.J. Generation of Esr1-knockout rats using zinc finger nuclease-mediated genome editing. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 1991–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Quaynor, S.D.; Stradtman, E.W., Jr.; Kim, H.-G.; Shen, Y.; Chorich, L.P.; Schreihofer, D.A.; Layman, L.C. Delayed puberty and estrogen resistance in a woman with estrogen receptor α variant. New Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Tang, Z.-R.; Zhang, R.; Lian, Z.-X.; Deng, S.-L.; Yu, K. Estrogen-receptor expression and function in female reproductive disease. Cells 2019, 8, 1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Hewitt, S.C.; Winuthayanon, W.; Korach, K.S. What’s new in estrogen receptor action in the female reproductive tract. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2016, 56, R55–R71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Harris, H.A.; Bruner-Tran, K.L.; Zhang, X.; Osteen, K.G.; Lyttle, C.R. A selective estrogen receptor-β agonist causes lesion regression in an experimentally induced model of endometriosis. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 936–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Couse, J.; Yates, M.; Deroo, B.; Korach, K. Estrogen receptor beta augments gonadotropin-induced granulose cell differentiation and pre-ovulatory response to gonadotropins. Endocrinology 2005, 146, 3247–3262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Zhang, H.; Yi, M.; Zhang, Y.; Jin, H.; Zhang, W.; Yang, J.; Yan, L.; Li, R.; Zhao, Y.; Qiao, J. High-fat diets exaggerate endocrine and metabolic phenotypes in a rat model of DHEA-induced PCOS. Reproduction 2016, 151, 431–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Majumder, S.; Das, S.; Moulik, S.R.; Mallick, B.; Pal, P.; Mukherjee, D. G-protein coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) inhibits final oocyte maturation in common carp, Cyprinus carpio. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2015, 211, 28–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. McPhaul, M.J. Androgen receptor mutations and androgen insensitivity. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2002, 198, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Walters, K.; Handelsman, D. Role of androgens in the ovary. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2018, 465, 36–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Haas, E.; Bhattacharya, I.; Brailoiu, E.; Damjanovic, M.; Brailoiu, G.C.; Gao, X.; Mueller-Guerre, L.; Marjon, N.A.; Gut, A.; Minotti, R.; et al. Regulatory role of G protein-coupled estrogen receptor for vascular function and obesity. Circ. Res. 2009, 104, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Liu, S.; Le May, C.; Wong, W.P.; Ward, R.D.; Clegg, D.J.; Marcelli, M.; Korach, K.S.; Mauvais-Jarvis, F. Importance of extranuclear estrogen receptor-α and membrane G protein–coupled estrogen receptor in pancreatic islet survival. Diabetes 2009, 58, 2292–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Martensson, U.E.; Salehi, S.A.; Windahl, S.; Gomez, M.F.; Swärd, K.; Daszkiewicz-Nilsson, J.; Wendt, A.; Andersson, N.; Hellstrand, P.; Grände, P.-O. Deletion of the G protein-coupled receptor 30 impairs glucose tolerance, reduces bone growth, increases blood pressure, and eliminates estradiol-stimulated insulin release in female mice. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 687–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Lancaster, T.; Jefferson, S.J.; Hunter, J.C.; Lopez, V.; Van Eyk, J.; Lakatta, E.G.; Korzick, D.H. Quantitative proteomic analysis reveals novel mitochondrial targets of estrogen deficiency in the aged female rat heart. Physiol. Genom. 2012, 44, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Meng, Z.; Jing, H.; Gan, L.; Li, H.; Luo, B. Resveratrol attenuated estrogen-deficient-induced cardiac dysfunction: Role of AMPK, SIRT1, and mitochondrial function. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2016, 8, 2641. [Google Scholar]
  98. Rattanasopa, C.; Phungphong, S.; Wattanapermpool, J.; Bupha-Intr, T. Significant role of estrogen in maintaining cardiac mitochondrial functions. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2015, 147, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sbert-Roig, M.; Bauzá-Thorbrügge, M.; Galmés-Pascual, B.M.; Capllonch-Amer, G.; García-Palmer, F.J.; Lladó, I.; Proenza, A.M.; Gianotti, M. GPER mediates the effects of 17β-estradiol in cardiac mitochondrial biogenesis and function. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2016, 420, 116–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Sun, L.-Y.; Wang, N.; Ban, T.; Sun, Y.-H.; Han, Y.; Sun, L.-L.; Yan, Y.; Kang, X.-H.; Chen, S.; Sun, L.-H. MicroRNA-23a mediates mitochondrial compromise in estrogen deficiency-induced concentric remodeling via targeting PGC-1α. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2014, 75, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sheppard, K.M.; Padmanabhan, V.; Coolen, L.M.; Lehman, M.N. Prenatal programming by testosterone of hypothalamic metabolic control neurones in the ewe. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2011, 23, 401–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Dumesic, D.A.; Akopians, A.L.; Madrigal, V.K.; Ramirez, E.; Margolis, D.J.; Sarma, M.K.; Thomas, A.M.; Grogan, T.R.; Haykal, R.; Schooler, T.A. Hyperandrogenism accompanies increased intra-abdominal fat storage in normal weight polycystic ovary syndrome women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 4178–4188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Caldwell, A.S.; Edwards, M.C.; Desai, R.; Jimenez, M.; Gilchrist, R.B.; Handelsman, D.J.; Walters, K.A. Neuroendocrine androgen action is a key extraovarian mediator in the development of polycystic ovary syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E3334–E3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  104. Yanes, L.L.; Romero, D.G.; Moulana, M.; Lima, R.; Davis, D.D.; Zhang, H.; Lockhart, R.; Racusen, L.C.; Reckelhoff, J.F. Cardiovascular-renal and metabolic characterization of a rat model of polycystic ovary syndrome. Gend. Med. 2011, 8, 103–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Mishra, J.S.; More, A.S.; Hankins, G.D.; Kumar, S. Hyperandrogenemia reduces endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor-mediated relaxation in mesenteric artery of female rats. Biol. Reprod. 2017, 96, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Torres Fernandez, E.D.; Adams, K.V.; Syed, M.; Maranon, R.O.; Romero, D.G.; Yanes Cardozo, L.L. Long-Lasting Androgen-Induced Cardiometabolic Effects in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. J. Endocr. Soc. 2018, 2, 949–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Davis, G.K.; Intapad, S.; Newsome, A.D.; Coats, L.E.; Bamrick, D.R.; Ojeda, N.B.; Alexander, B.T. Androgen receptor blockade differentially regulates blood pressure in growth-restricted versus ovarian deficient rats. Hypertension 2019, 74, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. van Hoesel, M.H.; Chen, Y.L.; Zheng, A.; Wan, Q.; Mourad, S.M. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 5, CD011169. [Google Scholar]
  109. Bulun, S.E.; Monsavais, D.; Pavone, M.E.; Dyson, M.; Xue, Q.; Attar, E.; Tokunaga, H.; Su, E.J. Role of estrogen receptor-β in endometriosis. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2012, 30, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  110. Burns, K.A.; Rodriguez, K.F.; Hewitt, S.C.; Janardhan, K.S.; Young, S.L.; Korach, K.S. Role of estrogen receptor signaling required for endometriosis-like lesion establishment in a mouse model. Endocrinology 2012, 153, 3960–3971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Burney, R.O.; Talbi, S.; Hamilton, A.E.; Vo, K.C.; Nyegaard, M.; Nezhat, C.R.; Lessey, B.A.; Giudice, L.C. Gene expression analysis of endometrium reveals progesterone resistance and candidate susceptibility genes in women with endometriosis. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 3814–3826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Han, S.J.; Jung, S.Y.; Wu, S.-P.; Hawkins, S.M.; Park, M.J.; Kyo, S.; Qin, J.; Lydon, J.P.; Tsai, S.Y.; Tsai, M.-J. Estrogen receptor β modulates apoptosis complexes and the inflammasome to drive the pathogenesis of endometriosis. Cell 2015, 163, 960–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  113. Plante, B.J.; Lessey, B.A.; Taylor, R.N.; Wang, W.; Bagchi, M.K.; Yuan, L.; Scotchie, J.; Fritz, M.A.; Young, S.L. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) expression in normal and abnormal endometrium. Reprod. Sci. 2012, 19, 684–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Pellegrini, C.; Gori, I.; Achtari, C.; Hornung, D.; Chardonnens, E.; Wunder, D.; Fiche, M.; Canny, G.O. The expression of estrogen receptors as well as GREB1, c-MYC, and cyclin D1, estrogen-regulated genes implicated in proliferation, is increased in peritoneal endometriosis. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 1200–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Xue, Q.; Lin, Z.; Cheng, Y.-H.; Huang, C.-C.; Marsh, E.; Yin, P.; Milad, M.P.; Confino, E.; Reierstad, S.; Innes, J. Promoter methylation regulates estrogen receptor 2 in human endometrium and endometriosis. Biol. Reprod. 2007, 77, 681–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Montagna, P.; Capellino, S.; Villaggio, B.; Remorgida, V.; Ragni, N.; Cutolo, M.; Ferrero, S. Peritoneal fluid macrophages in endometriosis: Correlation between the expression of estrogen receptors and inflammation. Fertil. Steril. 2008, 90, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Bedaiwy, M.A.; Dahoud, W.; Skomorovska-Prokvolit, Y.; Yi, L.; Liu, J.H.; Falcone, T.; Hurd, W.W.; Mesiano, S. Abundance and localization of progesterone receptor isoforms in endometrium in women with and without endometriosis and in peritoneal and ovarian endometriotic implants. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 22, 1153–1161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Bukulmez, O.; Hardy, D.B.; Carr, B.R.; Word, R.A.; Mendelson, C.R. Inflammatory status influences aromatase and steroid receptor expression in endometriosis. Endocrinology 2008, 149, 1190–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Vinci, G.; Arkwright, S.; Audebourg, A.; Radenen, B.; Chapron, C.; Borghese, B.; Dousset, B.; Mehats, C.; Vaiman, D.; Vacher-Lavenu, M.-C. Correlation between the clinical parameters and tissue phenotype in patients affected by deep-infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 2016, 23, 1258–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Chaudhary, S.C.; Singh, T.; Talwelkar, S.S.; Srivastava, R.K.; Arumugam, A.; Weng, Z.; Elmets, C.A.; Afaq, F.; Kopelovich, L.; Athar, M. Erb-041, an estrogen receptor-β agonist, inhibits skin photocarcinogenesis in SKH-1 hairless mice by downregulating the WNT signaling pathway. Cancer Prev. Res. 2014, 7, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Roman-Blas, J.A.; Castañeda, S.; Cutolo, M.; Herrero-Beaumont, G. Efficacy and safety of a selective estrogen receptor β agonist, ERB-041, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A 12-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study. Arthritis Care Res. 2010, 62, 1588–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Sharma, G.; Prossnitz, E.R. GPER/GPR30 knockout mice: Effects of GPER on metabolism. In Estrogen Receptors; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 489–502. [Google Scholar]
  123. Kim, J.B. Dynamic cross talk between metabolic organs in obesity and metabolic diseases. Exp. Mol. Med. 2016, 48, e214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  124. Falconer, H.; Mwenda, J.M.; Chai, D.C.; Wagner, C.; Song, X.; Mihalyi, A.; Simsa, P.; Kyama, C.; Cornillie, F.; Bergqvist, A. Treatment with anti-TNF monoclonal antibody (c5N) reduces the extent of induced endometriosis in the baboon. Hum. Reprod. 2006, 21, 1856–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Zhao, Y.; Gong, P.; Chen, Y.; Nwachukwu, J.C.; Srinivasan, S.; Ko, C.; Bagchi, M.K.; Taylor, R.N.; Korach, K.S.; Nettles, K.W. Dual suppression of estrogenic and inflammatory activities for targeting of endometriosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 271ra9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Khine, Y.M.; Taniguchi, F.; Nagira, K.; Nakamura, K.; Ohbayashi, T.; Osaki, M.; Harada, T. New insights into the efficacy of SR-16234, a selective estrogen receptor modulator, on the growth of murine endometriosis-like lesions. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 80, e13023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  127. Tanbo, T.; Mellembakken, J.; Bjercke, S.; Ring, E.; Åbyholm, T.; Fedorcsak, P. Ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome. Acta Obstet. Et Gynecol. Scand. 2018, 97, 1162–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Jones, T.; Ho, J.R.; Gualtieri, M.; Bruno-Gaston, J.; Chung, K.; Paulson, R.J.; Bendikson, K.A. Clomiphene stair-step protocol for women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 131, 91–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Chaabane, S.; Sheehy, O.; Monnier, P.; Fraser, W.; Bissonnette, F.; Trasler, J.M.; Muanda, F.T.; Boukhris, T.; Karam, F.; Santos, F. Ovarian stimulation, intrauterine insemination, multiple pregnancy and major congenital malformations: A systematic review and meta-analysis-The ART_Rev Study. Curr. Drug Saf. 2016, 11, 222–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Coughlan, C.; Fitzgerald, J.; Milne, P.; Wingfield, M. Is it safe to prescribe clomiphene citrate without ultrasound monitoring facilities? J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 30, 393–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Perales-Puchalt, A.; Legro, R.S. Ovulation induction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Steroids 2013, 78, 767–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sharma, G.; Prossnitz, E.R. Mechanisms of estradiol-induced insulin secretion by the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor GPR30/GPER in pancreatic β-cells. Endocrinology 2011, 152, 3030–3039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Tica, A.A.; Dun, E.C.; Tica, O.S.; Gao, X.; Arterburn, J.B.; Brailoiu, G.C.; Oprea, T.I.; Brailoiu, E. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1-mediated effects in the rat myometrium. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2011, 301, C1262–C1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  134. Wagenfeld, A.; Bone, W.; Schwede, W.; Fritsch, M.; Fischer, O.M.; Moeller, C. BAY 1002670: A novel, highly potent and selective progesterone receptor modulator for gynaecological therapies. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 28, 2253–2264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Bradley, L.; Ren, X.; Groettrup-Wolfers, E.; Petersdorf, K.; Seitz, C. Results of the asteroid (assess safety and efficacy of vilaprisan in patients with uterine fibroids) 1 study: A phase 2, placebo-controlled dose finding study. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, e95–e96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Schütt, B.; Schultze-Mosgau, M.H.; Draeger, C.; Chang, X.; Löwen, S.; Kaiser, A.; Rohde, B. Effect of the novel selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan on ovarian activity in healthy women. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2018, 58, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  137. Islam, M.S.; Afrin, S.; Jones, S.I.; Segars, J. Selective progesterone receptor modulators—Mechanisms and therapeutic utility. Endocr. Rev. 2020, 41, 643–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Schultze-Mosgau, M.-H.; Schuett, B.; Hafner, F.-T.; Zollmann, F.; Kaiser, A.; Hoechel, J.; Rohde, B. Pharmacokinetics and safety of the selective progesterone receptor modulator vilaprisan in healthy postmenopausal women. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2017, 55, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Calaf, J.; Lopez, E.; Millet, A.; Alcañiz, J.; Fortuny, A.; Vidal, O.; Callejo, J.; Escobar-Jimenez, F.; Torres, E.; Espinos, J. Long-term efficacy and tolerability of flutamide combined with oral contraception in moderate to severe hirsutism: A 12-month, double-blind, parallel clinical trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2007, 92, 3446–3452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Paradisi, R.; Fabbri, R.; Battaglia, C.; Venturoli, S. Ovulatory effects of flutamide in the polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2013, 29, 391–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Diamanti-Kandarakis, E.; Mitrakou, A.; Raptis, S.; Tolis, G.; Duleba, A.J. The effect of a pure antiandrogen receptor blocker, flutamide, on the lipid profile in the polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998, 83, 2699–2705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Conneely, O.M.; Lydon, J.P. Progesterone receptors in reproduction: Functional impact of the A and B isoforms. Steroids 2000, 65, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Kaya, H.S.; Hantak, A.M.; Stubbs, L.J.; Taylor, R.N.; Bagchi, I.C.; Bagchi, M.K. Roles of progesterone receptor A and B isoforms during human endometrial decidualization. Mol. Endocrinol. 2015, 29, 882–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  144. Babayev, S.N.; Park, C.W.; Keller, P.W.; Carr, B.R.; Word, R.A.; Bukulmez, O. Androgens upregulate endometrial epithelial progesterone receptor expression: Potential implications for endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 24, 1454–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Iwai, M.; Kanzaki, H.; Fujimoto, M.; Kojima, K.; Hatayama, H.; Inoue, T.; Higuchi, T.; Nakayama, H.; Mori, T.; Fujita, J. Regulation of sex steroid receptor gene expression by progesterone and testosterone in cultured human endometrial stromal cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1995, 80, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of sex steroid hormone receptors in males and females. ER: oestrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; AR: androgen receptor.
Figure 1. Distribution of sex steroid hormone receptors in males and females. ER: oestrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; AR: androgen receptor.
Biomedicines 10 01705 g001
Figure 2. Association of receptor expression changes with the pathogenesis of abnormal folliculogenesis and endometriosis. ER: oestrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; AR: androgen receptor; GPER: G-protein oestrogen receptor.
Figure 2. Association of receptor expression changes with the pathogenesis of abnormal folliculogenesis and endometriosis. ER: oestrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; AR: androgen receptor; GPER: G-protein oestrogen receptor.
Biomedicines 10 01705 g002
Figure 3. Summary of potential treatment routes for PCOS-related disorders. ER: oestrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; AR: androgen receptor; GPER: G-protein oestrogen receptor; OBHS: oxabicycloheptene sulfonate.
Figure 3. Summary of potential treatment routes for PCOS-related disorders. ER: oestrogen receptor; PR: progesterone receptor; AR: androgen receptor; GPER: G-protein oestrogen receptor; OBHS: oxabicycloheptene sulfonate.
Biomedicines 10 01705 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdul Hamid, F.; Abu, M.A.; Abdul Karim, A.K.; Ahmad, M.F.; Abd. Aziz, N.H.; Mohd Kamal, D.A.; Mokhtar, M.H. Sex Steroid Receptors in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Endometriosis: Insights from Laboratory Studies to Clinical Trials. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1705.

AMA Style

Abdul Hamid F, Abu MA, Abdul Karim AK, Ahmad MF, Abd. Aziz NH, Mohd Kamal DA, Mokhtar MH. Sex Steroid Receptors in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Endometriosis: Insights from Laboratory Studies to Clinical Trials. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(7):1705.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdul Hamid, Fazilah, Muhammad Azrai Abu, Abdul Kadir Abdul Karim, Mohd Faizal Ahmad, Nor Haslinda Abd. Aziz, Datu Agasi Mohd Kamal, and Mohd Helmy Mokhtar. 2022. "Sex Steroid Receptors in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome and Endometriosis: Insights from Laboratory Studies to Clinical Trials" Biomedicines 10, no. 7: 1705.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop