Next Article in Journal
Macrophage Phenotype in Combination with Tumor Microbiome Composition Predicts RCC Patients’ Survival: A Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Diagnostic Value of AngioPLUS Microvascular Imaging in Thyroid Nodule Diagnosis Using Quantitative and Qualitative Vascularity Grading
Previous Article in Journal
Novel Phenotyping for Acute Heart Failure—Unsupervised Machine Learning-Based Approach
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessing Detection Accuracy of Computerized Sonographic Features and Computer-Assisted Reading Performance in Differentiating Thyroid Cancers
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomedicines
Volume 10
Issue 7
10.3390/biomedicines10071515
biomedicines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Genetic Changes in Thyroid Cancers and the Importance of Their Preoperative Detection in Relation to the General Treatment and Determination of the Extent of Surgical Intervention—A Review

by
Jiri Hlozek
1,2,*,
Barbora Pekova
3,
Jan Rotnágl
1,2,
Richard Holý
1,2 and
Jaromir Astl
1,2
1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery, Military University Hospital, 16902 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 10000 Prague, Czech Republic
3
Department of Molecular Endocrinology, Institute of Endocrinology, 11694 Prague, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(7), 1515; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071515
Submission received: 25 May 2022 / Revised: 20 June 2022 / Accepted: 24 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Thyroid Cancer: From Diagnosis to Treatment)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Carcinomas of the thyroid gland are some of the most common malignancies of the endocrine system. The causes of tumor transformation are genetic changes in genes encoding cell signaling pathways that lead to an imbalance between cell proliferation and apoptosis. Some mutations have been associated with increased tumor aggressiveness, metastatic lymph node spread, tendency to dedifferentiate, and/or reduced efficiency of radioiodine therapy. The main known genetic causes of thyroid cancer include point mutations in the BRAF, RAS, TERT, RET, and TP53 genes and the fusion genes RET/PTC, PAX8/PPAR-γ, and NTRK. Molecular genetic testing of the fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid tissue in the preoperative period or of the removed thyroid tissue in the postoperative period is becoming more and more common in selected institutions. Positive detection of genetic changes, thus, becomes a diagnostic and prognostic factor and a factor that determines the extent of the surgical and nonsurgical treatment. The findings of genetic research on thyroid cancer are now beginning to be applied to clinical practice. In preoperative molecular diagnostics, the aggressiveness of cancers with the most frequently occurring mutations is correlated with the extent of the planned surgical treatment (radicality of surgery, neck dissection, etc.). However, clear algorithms are not established for the majority of genetic alterations. This review aims to provide a basic overview of the findings of the most commonly occurring gene mutations in thyroid cancer and to discuss the current recommendations on the extent of surgical and biological treatment concerning preoperatively detected genetic changes.

1. Introduction

Thyroid carcinomas (TC) represent approximately 1% of all malignancies, but they are also the most common endocrine malignancies with a frequency of more than 90% [1]. The most common TC, papillary carcinoma (PTC), followed by follicular (FTC), low-differentiated, and the rare but most aggressive anaplastic carcinoma (ATC), arises from the follicular cells of the thyroid gland [2]. Medullary carcinoma (MTC) originates from the parafollicular cells of the thyroid gland [2].
The known risk factors for the development of TC are ionizing radiation, iodine deficiency or excess, high levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone, and genetic predisposition [1,2].
Ultrasonography, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), histopathological examination of the thyroid gland tissue, and laboratory tests with the possibility of measuring the tumor markers thyroglobulin and calcitonin are the basic diagnostic tools for the disease [2,3]. Molecular genetic testing of the FNAC sample is becoming more and more common in certain institutions [3]. Some mutations are specific for certain types of carcinomas and can therefore contribute to molecular diagnosis in the preoperative period, including refinement of the diagnosis in cytologically unclear findings (Bethesda categories III–V) [3]. Signs of increased tumor aggressiveness, metastatic lymph node involvement, and a tendency to dedifferentiate or reduced efficacy of radioiodine therapy have been described in association with some mutations [4,5,6]. However, for many mutations, the correlation between prognosis and the biological behavior of the tumor is so far unclear.
The American Thyroid Association (ATA), the European Thyroid Association (ETA) and the European Society for Medical Oncology propose the recommended treatments for thyroid disease [7,8,9]. Surgery, radioiodine therapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, and, in recent years, expanding biological therapy related to the findings of molecular genetic analysis are the basis of therapy for thyroid malignancies and metastases to the affected lymph nodes [2,7,8,9]. However, the importance of preoperative detection of gene mutations associated with thyroid oncology in relation to the eventual escalation or de-escalation of surgical treatment is neither clearly addressed nor supported by sufficient scientific evidence in the current guidelines.
Our review aims to provide a basic overview of the most frequently occurring gene mutations in TC and to discuss the possibilities of nonsurgical and surgical treatment and its extent with regard to the risk of morbidity and prognosis of the disease in relation to the preoperative diagnosis of genetic changes.

2. Genetic Basis of Thyroid Tumors

The principle of tumor transformation and progression is the disruption of cell signal pathways regulating the balance between cell proliferation and apoptosis (Figure 1) [10]. Genetic changes occurring in genes encoding proteins of the MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) signal pathway, which plays an important role in a wide range of cellular processes, such as regulation of gene expression, proliferation, differentiation, and programmed cell death, and in genes encoding the PI3K-AKT signal pathway, which plays a role in the regulation of glucose metabolism, survival, adhesion, and cell motility, have been described in the pathogenesis of thyroid cancer [10,11]. Two molecular mechanisms are mainly involved in thyroid cancer—point mutations and chromosomal rearrangements (fusion genes) [11]. In the case of point mutation, a single nucleotide is changed. In the case of chromosomal rearrangement, two different genes are fused [11]. Most of these genetic changes are nonhereditary—somatic (mutations arising directly in the thyroid tissue) [11]. Hereditary germline mutations are typical for familial forms of MTC and multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes (MEN2A, MEN2B) [11]. Somatic mutations are analyzed from suspected thyroid tissue (FNAC, resected thyroid tumor tissue) [10]. Germline mutations are analyzed from peripheral blood collected from the patient and possibly his/her relatives [10].
Currently, point mutations in BRAF, RAS, TERT, RET, TP53, and the fusion genes RET/PTC, PAX8/PPAR-γ, NTRK are the main known genetic causes of TC [10,11]. The investigation of other causative gene mutations that are still unknown is the subject of intensive research [5,12,13].

2.1. BRAF

BRAF is a proto-oncogene encoding a cytoplasmic kinase that is involved in the MAPK pathway and is thus responsible for the regulation of cell proliferation, differentiation, and programmed cell death [11].
The 15th exon of the BRAF gene contains the most common PTC point mutation (valine to glutamate substitution at codon 600—BRAF V600E), causing permanent activation of the BRAF protein [11,13]. The mutated BRAF protein affects the expression of several genes, including reduced expression of the NIS (natriumiodide symporter) gene and genes for thyroglobulin and thyroperoxidase [14,15].
In association with this mutation, a worse prognosis and more frequent disease recurrence have been described, associated with higher tumor aggressiveness, extrathyroidal spread, local and distant lymph node metastases, and reduced effect of radioiodine therapy due to reduced iodine transport into the cell [4].
The occurrence of the BRAF V600E mutation is associated with an almost 100% risk of malignancy and occurs in approximately 30–70% of PTC and 30–40% of ATC [16]. According to the ETA’s recommendations, total thyroidectomy and consideration of region VI elective neck dissection is recommended in case of preoperative detection of BRAF V600E in nodules larger than 1 cm [8].

2.2. RAS

RAS genes encode a group of proteins that transmit a signal from the transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor to the nucleus via the MAPK or PI3K-AKT pathway and are therefore important in cell growth and differentiation [5].
A point mutation in these genes can transform a proto-oncogene into an oncogene with subsequent stimulation of cell proliferation and inhibition of cell differentiation [5,6]. The most frequently detected mutations in the HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS genes can occur in benign and malignant thyroid tumors, and their significance is still not completely clear [6]. Mutations in RAS genes are considered to be an early transforming event and may predispose to progression to carcinoma in benign tumors [5,6,17].
The occurrence of RAS mutation is described in approximately 20% of follicular variants of PTC, 20–40% of FTA, 40–50% of FTC, and 20–40% of ATC [11,18]. After BRAF mutation, it is the most frequently detected genetic alteration in thyroid biopsies [19]. The risk of malignancy when RAS mutation is present in thyroid biopsies is reported differently for each gene: HRAS = 70.7%, NRAS = 63.4%, and KRAS = 33% [19].
According to the ETA’s recommendations, when pathogenic variants in RAS genes are detected, less radical surgery (e.g., hemithyroidectomy) is recommended, but other clinical and anamnestic data of the patient should be considered [8].

2.3. RET

The RET proto-oncogene encodes a transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor and plays a key role in cell growth, differentiation, and survival [11]. Point mutations in the RET gene are typical for MTC [5]. Germline mutations are diagnosed in more than 95% of MEN2A and MEN2B patients, whereas the incidence of germline mutations in familiar MTC and somatic mutations in sporadic MTC is lower (50%) [20].
Genetic screening is recommended for relatives of patients with a detected germline mutation in the RET gene [12]. In case of an inherited RET mutation, there is a high risk of MTC, based on which a preventive total thyroidectomy is recommended [7,9].
Based on the described genotype–phenotype correlations, individual recommendations are established, especially regarding the timing of prophylactic total thyroidectomy in childhood to prevent the development of the disease [21].

2.4. RET/PTC

The chromosomal rearrangement RET/PTC is the most common mutation in TC in children and adolescents [13]. This fusion gene is more commonly associated with the classic papillary variant of TC and is associated with more aggressive tumor behavior and frequent metastatic dissemination [22]. Cases of carcinomas arising after radiation have been described in the past [2,22]. Detection of RET/PTC rearrangement is a strong indicator of PTC and may help in the FNAC molecular diagnosis, especially in cases of uncertain cytological findings. If RET/PTC rearrangement is detected, total thyroidectomy is recommended [8].

2.5. PAX8/PPAR-γ

PAX8/PPAR-γ is a fusion gene arising from a chromosomal rearrangement between the 2. and 3. chromosomes [11]. The PAX8 gene is a transcription factor and is involved in the expression of genes for thyroglobulin, peroxidase, and NIS [11]. PPAR-γ is involved in lipid metabolism, cell differentiation, cell growth inhibition, and apoptosis [23]. This rearrangement occurs in approximately 1–5% of PTC, up to 60% of FTC, and 2–10% of FTA (however, the latter shows an immunohistochemical profile typical for carcinomas) [24].
In the case of preoperative FNAC findings of PAX8/PPAR-γ, the reported risk of malignancy is 84.6–95% [8,19]. The finding of a fusion gene should lead to a more thorough histopathological examination [19,24]. In case of PAX8/PPAR-γ fusion gene detection, total thyroidectomy is indicated, according to ETA recommendations [8].

2.6. TERT

The TERT gene encodes the catalytic subunit of the enzyme telomerase, which is responsible for telomere elongation during DNA replication [11]. Two major point mutations, C228T and C250T, have been described in association with this gene [25,26]. Cancer cells positive for one of these mutations express telomerase at an increased level, and thus maintain the length of chromosomal telomeres and can proliferate almost without any limitations [26].
TERT mutations are associated with a higher incidence of local or distant metastasis and tumor aggressiveness [25]. Mutations have been found in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas, ATC, and more aggressive forms of PTC [25,27]. Coexistence with the BRAF V600E mutation is associated with higher tumor aggressiveness in PTC than in TERT and BRAF mutations occurring alone [28].
According to ETA recommendations, in case of preoperative detection of TERT mutation in nodules larger than 1 cm, total thyroidectomy and consideration of region VI elective neck dissection is recommended [8].

2.7. NTRK Fusion Genes

NTRK fusion genes are described in 5–10% of PTC, and in pediatric and adolescent patients, the prevalence is around 16% [29]. The finding of an NTRK fusion gene in a thyroid sample is associated with a 100% risk of malignancy [12,29]. NTRK fusion-positive carcinomas usually show the follicular arrangement and are associated with the occurrence of chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and frequent lymph node metastasis [5].

2.8. TP53

TP53 is a tumor suppressor gene that regulates cell growth—it blocks the cell cycle in the G1 phase and initiates apoptosis in case of nonrepairable DNA [11]. High expression and mutations of TP53 are detected in more than 75% of invasive and undifferentiated carcinomas [12]. The presence of TP53 mutations in differentiated carcinomas has been described as a possible sign of subsequent dedifferentiation in ATC [5].

2.9. miRNA

miRNAs are short single-stranded noncoding ribonucleic acids (RNAs) that are involved in gene regulation [30]. More than one-third of structural genes in the human body are regulated by miRNAs; thus, dysregulation of miRNAs can lead to many specific cancer conditions [31]. Abnormal expressions of numerous miRNAs have been described in TC [31,32]. A recent study found that different miRNA profiles are associated with unique histological variants and BRAF mutations in PTC, but their influence on thyroid oncology is a relatively new finding and is still under scientific research, and further studies focusing on the relationship between miRNA function and thyroid cancers are needed [32].

3. Thyroid Cancer Therapy in Relation to the Findings of Molecular Genetic Analysis

The discovery of new molecular genetic markers of carcinomas of the thyroid gland in relation to the clinical course of the disease, preoperative and perioperative findings, surgical treatment outcomes, and risk of recurrence and persistence of malignant disease leads to new insights. Thanks to genetic analysis and the experiences gained, it is now possible to personalize the treatment of TC in regard to the indication and determination of the extent of surgical treatment and the use of systemic targeted therapy (tyrosine kinase inhibitors—TKIs; monoclonal antibodies—mAbs).

3.1. Surgical Treatment

Positive detection of mutations (BRAF, RAS in MTC, RET, RET/PTC, PAX8-PPAR-γ, TERT, NTRK) is an indication for total thyroidectomy and thus prevents the removal of the thyroid gland in two stages and the associated risks (general anesthesia, timing of oncological treatment) [8]. However, preoperative detection of genetic changes may also lead to an extension of surgical treatment to the lymph node catchment area [7,8,9]. Because of the relatively high incidence of occult metastases in PTC (20–40%) and the associated higher risk of disease recurrence and mortality, the indication of elective block neck dissection of region VI in cN0 patients is still a matter of debate [33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
The detection of BRAF mutation as a possible predictive factor of occult metastasis could lead to the indication of elective neck dissection of region VI, which in the case of positive metastatic lymph nodes would lead to a reduction of recurrence and refinement of the extent of the disease (staging—conversion from cN0 to pN1a) [15,41,42,43,44,45,46]. However, the change in surgical treatment intensification (neck dissection routinely indicated) based on the identification of mutations in the preoperative period in cN0 PTC is still controversial because of the potential increased risk of surgical complications (recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, hypoparathyroidism) and its relation to the overall treatment benefit (persistence, recurrence of disease) [33,34,35,41,42].
Although the ATA mentions elective neck dissection for T3 and T4 TC and the ETA for BRAF-positive TC greater than 1 cm in size, they still recommend “only” consideration of elective surgery [7,8]. The subject of current and future works is prospective long-term studies to assess the potential role of BRAF and other thyroid mutations that will lead to clear and more precise recommendations regarding the extent of surgical treatment with respect to its risks and benefits [2,3,5,12].
In the following section, we present the results of recently published studies that address the general risks (temporary/permanent recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement, temporary/permanent hypoparathyroidism) and benefits (reduced incidence of persistence/recurrence of disease, reduced incidence of lymph node metastasis) of elective neck dissection of region VI in patients with thyroid carcinomas (especially PTC) [33,34,35,36,37,40]. We also present the results of studies focusing on performing neck dissections of region VI specifically in patients with BRAF V600E-positive mutation, where BRAF V600E mutation in PTC is correlated with a higher risk of occult metastasis, and it is discussed whether it should be a determining factor for indicating elective neck dissection of region VI under the assumption of improved survival and reduced risk of recurrence of the primary disease [15,41,42,43,44,45,46].
The results of studies comparing the benefits of elective neck dissection and the increased risk of postoperative complications in patients with PTC are different, with many authors pointing out the inappropriateness of routinely performed elective neck dissection [33,34,35] in contrast to authors who recommend extended surgical treatment [36,37,38,39,40]. Publications suggesting that routine elective neck dissection is not recommended show a statistically significantly higher incidence of postoperative surgical complications in terms of temporary damage of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, temporary hypoparathyroidism, and permanent hypoparathyroidism, while finding no statistically significant difference in the overall survival and recurrence rate (including metastasis) of the disease in the group of patients operated by total thyroidectomy and neck dissection of region VI compared with the group of patients operated by total thyroidectomy only [33,34,35]. However, ipsilateral neck dissection of region VI could be an interesting option due to the lower rate of hypocalcemia [34]. On the other hand, authors of studies recommending total thyroidectomy concurrently with routine elective neck dissection point to statistically significant reduced risk of locoregional recurrence, reduced incidence of metastases to central neck lymph nodes, and reduced need for reoperations (these may lead to higher risk of surgical complications than first-time surgery) [36,37,40]. Routinely performed elective neck dissection may lead to the refinement of the pathological staging (pTNM classification) of the disease, however, further large prospective randomized trials are needed to properly assess the risk/benefit for cN0 PTC patients [35,37].
Due to the increased risk of temporary and permanent hypoparathyroidism in routinely performed elective neck dissection of the region VI and the different results of studies investigating the relationship of elective neck dissection with disease recurrence and survival in cN0 patients, risk factors related to metastatic spread to the central cervical lymph nodes have recently been studied. In the future, knowledge of these important risk factors should lead to the development of a diagnostic–therapeutic approach in order to predict the occurrence of metastases in cervical lymph nodes (not only central ones) and to indicate an adequate extent of surgical treatment in the preoperative period with regard to the high benefit and low risk of postoperative complications [15,41,42,43,44,45,46]. In recent studies, the most frequently mentioned predictive molecular factor for the occurrence of occult metastases to central cervical lymph nodes in cNO patients is the BRAF V600E mutation [15,38,39,43,44,45,46]. In large meta-analyses, male gender, age, tumor size > 10 mm, multifocality, tumor bilaterality, thyroid capsule affected by tumor, angiolymphatic invasion, and high histological risk have been correlated as additional predictive clinicopathological factors [42,44,45,46]. The presence of risk factors and especially their combination can be successfully used to differentiate cN0 patients with or without central neck lymph node metastases, and in particular, the simultaneous occurrence of BRAF V600E mutation with other risk factors can be a decisive factor for the extent of surgical treatment [15,44]. At the same time, BRAF V600E-positive patients who underwent elective neck dissection of region VI showed statistically significant improvement in disease survival without recurrence [45]. On the other hand, there are also published papers that do not consider BRAF V600E mutation as a predictive factor for the occurrence of lymph node metastases and that describe the same treatment outcome in cN0 patients with PTC BRAF V600E-positive mutation regardless of the extent of surgery (total thyroidectomy only vs. total thyroidectomy and neck dissection of region VI) and do not recommend elective neck dissection based on BRAF V600E detection, despite the fact that patients who have undergone neck dissection undergo repeated radioiodine treatment at a lower rate [41,42].
The role of elective neck dissection in the treatment of PTC without clinically present lymph node metastases remains controversial, especially regarding indications, approach, and surgical extension of treatment [32,34,35,36,37,40]. Although morbidity and survival rates appear to be similar to those reported for total thyroidectomy alone, the impact of neck dissection VI on local recurrence and long-term survival is still under investigation [36,37,40,45]. Currently, most publications recommend selective indications for elective neck dissection in patients diagnosed with risk factors or combinations of risk factors (most frequently mentioned: BRAF mutations, tumor size, multifocality, extracapsular spread) rather than routinely indicated lymph node procedures [15,44,45,46].
The current recommendations for surgical treatment in relation to preoperatively diagnosed genetic changes in TC are summarized in Table 1.

3.2. Targeted Therapy

TKIs are cytostatics that block the growth of cancer cells, so their use can stabilize or improve cancer, but not cure it completely [47]. Because of the number of alternative signal pathways that are able to be activated when one “targeted” pathway is blocked, targeted therapy may not be fully effective [47,48].
Side effects, such as diarrhea, vomiting, fatigue, arterial hypertension, hepatotoxicity, and rash, have been described during the use of TKIs. TKI therapy is reserved for patients with rapid progression of radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer and is therefore indicated as an additional treatment to the primary therapy for thyroid cancer (surgery, radioiodine therapy, radiotherapy) [20,47,48,49,50]. According to the mechanism of effect, TKIs can be divided into multikinase inhibitors (inhibiting multiple intracellular and cell surface kinases) and mutation-specific inhibitors (selectively inhibiting the tyrosine kinase or kinases that are involved in the aberrant signaling way). The most frequently used are:

3.2.1. Multikinase Inhibitors

Sorafenib—indicated for radioiodine refractory differentiated TC (target: VEGF1–3, PDGFR, RET, BRAF, c-kit). The drug has also been successful in patients with metastatic PTC, FTC, ATC, and MTC [51].
Lenvatinib—indicated for the treatment of patients with progressive, locally advanced, or metastatic differentiated radioiodine refractory thyroid cancer (target: VEGFR1–3, PDGFR, RET, BRAF, c-kit) [52].
Vandetanib—indicated for the treatment of aggressive and symptomatic MTC in patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic disease (target: VEGFR2/3, EGFR, RET). In metastatic MTC, it is a drug with low toxicity for surrounding tissues and results in the reduction of the growth of the primary tumor and its metastases [53].
Cabozantinib—indicated for the treatment of adult patients with progressive, inoperable locally advanced, and/or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (target: VEGFR2, RET, MET, FLT3, c-kit) [53].

3.2.2. Specific Inhibitors

Larotrectinib—NTRK inhibitor indicated in monotherapy for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients with solid tumors expressing the NTRK fusion gene who have locally advanced, metastatic disease and/or for whom surgical resection would likely result in significant morbidity [54].
Selpercatinib and pralsetinib—indicated for advanced or metastatic thyroid cancer with the positivity of a RET point mutation or the RET fusion gene. Selpercatinib is indicated in monotherapy for the treatment of adults and adolescents with advanced medullary thyroid cancer with RET mutation who require systemic therapy following prior treatment with cabozantinib and/or vandetanib [55].
Dabrafenib and trametinib—selective BRAF and MEK1/2 inhibitors indicated for patients with anaplastic thyroid cancer in whom the BRAF V600E mutation is present. This combination appears to be a promising treatment for its overall response rate and duration of response with controllable toxicity [56].

4. Conclusions

Nowadays, the findings of genetic research on thyroid cancer are beginning to be applied to clinical practice [12]. In preoperative molecular FNAC diagnostics, the aggressiveness of cancers with the most frequently occurring mutations (BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, TERT, PAX8/PPAR-γ, RET proto-oncogene) is correlated with the extent of the planned surgical treatment [32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. However, there are no established guidelines for most genetic alterations, and their use in the preoperative and postoperative periods is still debated.
Total thyroidectomy remains the primary procedure for thyroid carcinomas [7,8,9]. Currently, the most studied mutations are BRAF V600E, which is 100% specific for malignancy, and germline mutations of the RET proto-oncogene, the detection of which is an indication for prophylactic surgical treatment [8,16,21]. Preoperative detection of mutations leads to: (1) more radical thyroid surgery (total thyroidectomy instead of hemithyroidectomy) and (2) consideration of region VI elective neck dissection in cN0 patients [7,8,9,12,15,43,44,45,46].
In the last decade, the nonsurgical treatment of advanced thyroid cancer has undergone great development. Currently, single-targeted (mutation specific) and multitargeted therapies can be used, particularly for aggressive, refractory, and metastatic thyroid carcinomas that do not respond to surgical and radioiodine treatment.
The concept of elective neck dissection in patients with cN0 PTC is still debated with regard to the risks and benefits of surgical treatment of the cervical lymph nodes. The subject of further research is the identification of risk factors (not only genetic) correlated with metastatic spread to the lymph nodes and their application in the preoperative period.
The objective of further research is to identify the genetic cause of different types of thyroid cancer and to understand the nature of the disease, its development, and prognosis. These findings may lead to personalized and targeted patient treatment and to an update of the recommended surgical management of thyroid cancer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H. and B.P.; writing—review and editing, B.P., J.R. and R.H.; supervision, J.A.; project administration J.H. and R.H.; funding acquisition, J.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic, Project MO 1012, Ministry of Health of the Czech Republic AZV (NU21-0100448) and MH CZ-DRO (Institute of Endocrinology-EU, 00023761) grants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Miranda-Filho, A.; Lortet-Tieulent, J.; Bray, F.; Cao, B.; Franceschi, S.; Vaccarella, S.; Dal Maso, L. Thyroid cancer incidence trends by histology in 25 countries: A population-based study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021, 9, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vlček, P.; Nováková, D.; Katra, R. Thyroid carcinomas: The present view on diagnostics and therapy. Vnitr. Lek. 2017, 63, 572–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Grimmichova, T.; Pacesova, P.; Hill, M.; Pekova, B.; Vankova, M.; Moravcova, J.; Vrbikova, J.; Novak, Z.; Mastnikova, K.; Vaclavikova, E.; et al. Thyroid Cancer Detection in a Routine Clinical Setting: Performance of ACR TI-RADS, FNAC, and Molecular Testing in Prospective Cohort Study. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xing, M.; Alzahrani, A.S.; Carson, K.A.; Shong, Y.K.; Kim, T.Y.; Viola, D.; Elisei, R.; Bendlová, B.; Yip, L.; Mian, C.; et al. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 33, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Nikiforov, Y.E. Molecular diagnostics of thyroid tumors. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2011, 135, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Suarez, H.G.; du Villard, J.A.; Severino, M.; Caillou, B.; Schlumberger, M.; Tubiana, M.; Parmentier, C.; Monier, R. Presence of mutations in all three ras genes in human thyroid tumors. Oncogene 1990, 5, 565–570. [Google Scholar]
  7. Haugen, B.R.; Alexander, E.K.; Bible, K.C.; Doherty, G.M.; Mandel, S.J.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Pacini, F.; Randolph, G.W.; Sawka, A.M.; Schlumberger, M.; et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016, 26, 1–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Paschke, R.; Cantara, S.; Crescenzi, A.; Jarzab, B.; Musholt, T.J.; Sobrinho Simoes, M. European Thyroid Association Guidelines regarding Thyroid Nodule Molecular Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Diagnostics. Eur. Thyroid. J. 2017, 6, 115–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Filetti, S.; Durante, C.; Hartl, D.; Leboulleux, S.; Locati, L.D.; Newbold, K.; Papotti, M.G.; Berruti, A.; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Thyroid cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1856–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wu, C.; Schwartz, J.M.; Brabant, G.; Nenadic, G. Molecular profiling of thyroid cancer subtypes using large-scale text mining. BMC Med. Genomics 2014, 7, S3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Prete, A.; Borges de Souza, P.; Censi, S.; Muzza, M.; Nucci, N.; Sponziello, M. Update on Fundamental Mechanisms of Thyroid Cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nikiforov, Y.E. Role of Molecular Markers in Thyroid Nodule Management: Then and Now. Endocr. Pract. Off. J. Am. Coll. Endocrinol. Am. Assoc. Clin. Endocrinol. 2017, 23, 979–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pekova, B.; Dvorakova, S.; Sykorova, V.; Vacinova, G.; Vaclavikova, E.; Moravcova, J.; Katra, R.; Vlcek, P.; Sykorova, P.; Kodetova, D.; et al. Somatic genetic alterations in a large cohort of pediatric thyroid nodules. Endocr. Connect. 2019, 8, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Xing, M.; Alzahrani, A.S.; Carson, K.A.; Viola, D.; Elisei, R.; Bendlova, B.; Yip, L.; Mian, C.; Vianello, F.; Tuttle, R.M.; et al. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and mortality in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. JAMA 2013, 309, 1493–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Song, J.Y.; Sun, S.R.; Dong, F.; Huang, T.; Wu, B.; Zhou, J. Predictive Value of BRAFV600E Mutation for Lymph Node Metastasis in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-analysis. Curr. Med. Sci. 2018, 38, 785–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Xing, M. BRAF mutation in thyroid cancer. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2005, 12, 245–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Paulson, V.A.; Shivdasani, P.; Angell, T.E.; Cibas, E.S.; Krane, J.F.; Lindeman, N.I.; Alexander, E.K.; Barletta, J.A. Noninvasive Follicular Thyroid Neoplasm with Papillary-Like Nuclear Features Accounts for More Than Half of ”Carcinomas” Harboring RAS Mutations. Thyroid 2017, 27, 506–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xing, M. Clinical utility of RAS mutations in thyroid cancer: A blurred picture now emerging clearer. BMC Med. 2016, 14, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Cohen, D.S.; Tongson-Ignacio, J.E.; Lolachi, C.M.; Ghaderi, V.S.; Jahan-Parwar, B.; Thompson, L.D.R. Rethinking Malignancy Risk in Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules with Positive Molecular Studies: Southern California Permanente Experience. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 2019, 161, 419–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Laha, D.; Nilubol, N.; Boufraqech, M. New Therapies for Advanced Thyroid Cancer. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Machens, A.; Dralle, H. Long-term outcome after DNA-based prophylactic neck surgery in children at risk of hereditary medullary thyroid cancer. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 33, 101274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zitzelsberger, H.; Bauer, V.; Thomas, G.; Unger, K. Molecular rearrangements in papillary thyroid carcinomas. Clin. Chim. Acta 2010, 411, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Asya, O.; Yumuşakhuylu, A.C.; Bağcı, P.; Kaya, H.; Gönen, A.; Gündoğdu, Y.; Muradov, T.; Şahin, A.; Oysu, Ç. Relationship of PPARG overexpression with prognostic parameters in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2022, 42, 34–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mitsiades, N.; Fagin, J.A. Molecular Genetics of Thyroid Cancer: Pathogenetic Significance and Clinical Applications. In Genetic Diagnosis of Endocrine Disorders, 1st ed.; Weiss, R.E., Refetoff, S., Eds.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2010; p. 323. [Google Scholar]
  25. Liu, X.; Bishop, J.; Shan, Y.; Pai, S.; Liu, D.; Murugan, A.K.; Sun, H.; El-Naggar, A.K.; Xing, M. Highly prevalent TERT promoter mutations in aggressive thyroid cancers. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2013, 20, 603–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. McKelvey, B.A.; Umbricht, C.B.; Zeiger, M.A. Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) Regulation in Thyroid Cancer: A Review. Front Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Chung, J.H. BRAF and TERT promoter mutations: Clinical application in thyroid cancer. Endocr. J. 2020, 67, 577–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ren, H.; Shen, Y.; Hu, D.; He, W.; Zhou, J.; Cao, Y.; Mao, Y.; Dou, Y.; Xiong, W.; Xiao, Q.; et al. Co-existence of BRAFV600E and TERT promoter mutations in papillary thyroid carcinoma is associated with tumor aggressiveness, but not with lymph node metastasis. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018, 10, 1005–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Pekova, B.; Sykorova, V.; Mastnikova, K.; Vaclavikova, E.; Moravcova, J.; Vlcek, P.; Lastuvka, P.; Taudy, M.; Katra, R.; Bavor, P.; et al. NTRK Fusion Genes in Thyroid Carcinomas: Clinicopathological Characteristics and Their Impacts on Prognosis. Cancers 2021, 13, 1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kalfert, D.; Pesta, M.; Kulda, V.; Topolcan, O.; Ryska, A.; Celakovsky, P.; Laco, J.; Ludvikova, M. MicroRNA profile in site-specific head and neck squamous cell cancer. Anticancer Res. 2015, 35, 2455–2463. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nan, B.Y.; Xiong, G.F.; Zhao, Z.R.; Gu, X.; Huang, X.S. Comprehensive Identification of Potential Crucial Genes and miRNA-mRNA Regulatory Networks in Papillary Thyroid Cancer. BioMed Res. Int. 2021, 2021, 6752141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Galuppini, F.; Censi, S.; Merante Boschin, I.; Fassan, M.; Sbaraglia, M.; Valeri, N.; Hahne, J.C.; Bertazza, L.; Munari, G.; Galasso, M.; et al. Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: Molecular Distinction by MicroRNA Profiling. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2022, 13, 834075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Unlu, M.T.; Aygun, N.; Demircioglu, Z.G.; Isgor, A.; Uludag, M. Effects of Central Neck Dissection on Complications in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Şişli Etfal Hastan. Tıp Bülteni 2021, 55, 310–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Calò, P.G.; Conzo, G.; Raffaelli, M.; Medas, F.; Gambardella, C.; De Crea, C.; Gordini, L.; Patrone, R.; Sessa, L.; Erdas, E.; et al. Total thyroidectomy alone versus ipsilateral versus bilateral prophylactic central neck dissection in clinically node-negative differentiated thyroid carcinoma. A retrospective multicenter study. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 43, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Giordano, D.; Frasoldati, A.; Gabrielli, E.; Pernice, C.; Zini, M.; Castellucci, A.; Piana, S.; Ciarrocchi, A.; Cavuto, S.; Barbieri, V. Long-term outcomes of central neck dissection for cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2017, 38, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Yazıcı, D.; Çolakoğlu, B.; Sağlam, B.; Sezer, H.; Kapran, Y.; Aydın, Ö.; Demirkol, M.O.; Alagöl, F.; Terzioğlu, T. Effect of prophylactic central neck dissection on the surgical outcomes in papillary thyroid cancer: Experience in a single center. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2020, 277, 1491–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Zhao, W.; You, L.; Hou, X.; Chen, S.; Ren, X.; Chen, G.; Zhao, Y. The Effect of Prophylactic Central Neck Dissection on Locoregional Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Cancer After Total Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: PCND for the Locoregional Recurrence of Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 24, 2189–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Barbaro, D.; Incensati, R.M.; Materazzi, G.; Boni, G.; Grosso, M.; Panicucci, E.; Lapi, P.; Pasquini, C.; Miccoli, P. The BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid cancer with positive or suspected pre-surgical cytological finding is not associated with advanced stages or worse prognosis. Endocrine 2014, 45, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dong, S.Y.; Zeng, R.C.; Jin, L.P.; Yang, F.; Zhang, X.J.; Yao, Z.H.; Zhang, X.H.; Wang, O.C. BRAFV600E mutation is not associated with central lymph node metastasis in all patients with papillary thyroid cancer: Different histological subtypes and preoperative lymph node status should be taken into account. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 4122–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Mao, Y. Local lymph node recurrence after central neck dissection in papillary thyroid cancers: A meta analysis. Eur. Ann. Otorhinolaryngol. Head Neck Dis. 2019, 136, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Viola, D.; Materazzi, G.; Valerio, L.; Molinaro, E.; Agate, L.; Faviana, P.; Seccia, V.; Sensi, E.; Romei, C.; Piaggi, P.; et al. Prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection in papillary thyroid carcinoma: Clinical implications derived from the first prospective randomized controlled single institution study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2015, 100, 1316–1324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Dutenhefner, S.E.; Marui, S.; Santos, A.B.; de Lima, E.U.; Inoue, M.; Neto, J.S.; Shiang, C.; Fukushima, J.T.; Cernea, C.R.; Friguglietti, C.U. BRAF: A tool in the decision to perform elective neck dissection? Thyroid 2013, 23, 1541–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Howell, G.M.; Nikiforova, M.N.; Carty, S.E.; Armstrong, M.J.; Hodak, S.P.; Stang, M.T.; McCoy, K.L.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Yip, L. BRAF V600E mutation independently predicts central compartment lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2013, 20, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhang, K.; Qian, L.; Chen, J.; Zhu, Q.; Chang, C. Preoperative Prediction of Central Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis in Fine-Needle Aspiration Reporting Suspicious Papillary Thyroid Cancer or Papillary Thyroid Cancer Without Lateral Neck Metastasis. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 712723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Parvathareddy, S.K.; Siraj, A.K.; Ahmed, S.O.; DeVera, F.; Al-Sobhi, S.S.; Al-Dayel, F.; Al-Kuraya, K.S. Risk Factors for Central Lymph Node Metastases and Benefit of Prophylactic Central Lymph Node Dissection in Middle Eastern Patients With cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Front. Oncol. 2022, 11, 819824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ma, B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, S.; Ji, Q. Predictive factors for central lymph node metastasis in patients with cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Surg. 2016, 28, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Valerio, L.; Pieruzzi, L.; Giani, C.; Agate, L.; Bottici, V.; Lorusso, L.; Cappagli, V.; Puleo, L.; Matrone, A.; Viola, D.; et al. Targeted Therapy in Thyroid Cancer: State of the Art. Clin. Oncol. J. R. Coll. Radiol. 2017, 29, 316–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cabanillas, M.E.; Ryder, M.; Jimenez, C. Targeted Therapy for Advanced Thyroid Cancer: Kinase Inhibitors and Beyond. Endocr. Rev. 2019, 40, 1573–1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Prete, A.; Matrone, A.; Gambale, C.; Torregrossa, L.; Minaldi, E.; Romei, C.; Ciampi, R.; Molinaro, E.; Elisei, R. Poorly Differentiated and Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer: Insights into Genomics, Microenvironment and New Drugs. Cancers 2021, 13, 3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (Online), ver 2.2022. Available online: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/thyroid.pdf (accessed on 9 May 2022).
  51. Brose, M.S.; Nutting, C.M.; Jarzab, B.; Elisei, R.; Siena, S.; Bastholt, L.; de la Fouchardiere, C.; Pacini, F.; Paschke, R.; Shong, Y.K.; et al. Sorafenib in radioactive iodine-refractory, locally advanced or metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer: A randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2014, 384, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Schlumberger, M.; Tahara, M.; Wirth, L.J.; Robinson, B.; Brose, M.S.; Elisei, R.; Habra, M.A.; Newbold, K.; Shah, M.H.; Hoff, A.O.; et al. Lenvatinib versus placebo in radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2015, 372, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Koehler, V.F.; Adam, P.; Frank-Raue, K.; Raue, F.; Berg, E.; Hoster, E.; Allelein, S.; Schott, M.; Kroiss, M.; Spitzweg, C. Real-World Efficacy and Safety of Cabozantinib and Vandetanib in Advanced Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2021, 31, 459–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Waguespack, S.G.; Drilon, A.; Lin, J.J.; Brose, M.S.; McDermott, R.; Almubarak, M.; Bauman, J.; Casanova, M.; Krishnamurthy, A.; Kummar, S.; et al. Efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in patients with TRK fusion-positive thyroid carcinoma. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2022, 186, 631–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Angelousi, A.; Hayes, A.R.; Chatzellis, E.; Kaltsas, G.A.; Grossman, A.B. Metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma: A new way forward. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 2022, 29, R85–R103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Subbiah, V.; Kreitman, R.J.; Wainberg, Z.A.; Cho, J.Y.; Schellens, J.; Soria, J.C.; Wen, P.Y.; Zielinski, C.; Cabanillas, M.E.; Urbanowitz, G.; et al. Dabrafenib and Trametinib Treatment in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic BRAF V600-Mutant Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Biomedicines 10 01515 g001 550
Figure 1. Simlified scheme of cell signaling pathways important in thyroid cancerogenesis (RTK—growth factor receptortyrosine kinase; RAS, BRAF, MEK, ERK, PI3K—signal molecules; Akt—protein kinase B; mTOR—mechanistic target of rapamycin; PTEN—phosphatase and tensin homolog; PAX8/PPAR-γ—fusion gene).
Figure 1. Simlified scheme of cell signaling pathways important in thyroid cancerogenesis (RTK—growth factor receptortyrosine kinase; RAS, BRAF, MEK, ERK, PI3K—signal molecules; Akt—protein kinase B; mTOR—mechanistic target of rapamycin; PTEN—phosphatase and tensin homolog; PAX8/PPAR-γ—fusion gene).
Biomedicines 10 01515 g001
Table
Table 1. The most common mutations and their detection in thyroid tumors (FTA—follicular adenoma, PTC—papillary carcinoma, FTC—follicular carcinoma, MTC—medullary carcinoma, ATC—anaplastic carcinoma, TT—total thyroidectomy, HT—hemithyroidectomy, ND—neck dissection).
Table 1. The most common mutations and their detection in thyroid tumors (FTA—follicular adenoma, PTC—papillary carcinoma, FTC—follicular carcinoma, MTC—medullary carcinoma, ATC—anaplastic carcinoma, TT—total thyroidectomy, HT—hemithyroidectomy, ND—neck dissection).
FTAPTCFTCMTCATCRecommended Extent of Surgery
BRAF-30–70%--25–35%TT, consider elective ND
RAS20–40%10–20%40–50%HRAS, KRAS in 20–40% sporadic MTC20–40%HT;
In suspected MTC:
TT + ND
RET---95% familiar
50% sporadic		-(Prophylactic) TT + ND
RET/PTC-20%---TT
PAX8
PPAR-γ		Occasionally1–5%30–35%--TT
TERT-11%17%-40%TT, consider elective ND
NTRK-5–10%---TT
TP53OccasionallyOccasionally--60–70%-
PIK3CAOccasionally-10–30%-25–45%-
PTENOccasionally-8–10%-6%-
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hlozek, J.; Pekova, B.; Rotnágl, J.; Holý, R.; Astl, J. Genetic Changes in Thyroid Cancers and the Importance of Their Preoperative Detection in Relation to the General Treatment and Determination of the Extent of Surgical Intervention—A Review. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071515

AMA Style

Hlozek J, Pekova B, Rotnágl J, Holý R, Astl J. Genetic Changes in Thyroid Cancers and the Importance of Their Preoperative Detection in Relation to the General Treatment and Determination of the Extent of Surgical Intervention—A Review. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(7):1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071515

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hlozek, Jiri, Barbora Pekova, Jan Rotnágl, Richard Holý, and Jaromir Astl. 2022. "Genetic Changes in Thyroid Cancers and the Importance of Their Preoperative Detection in Relation to the General Treatment and Determination of the Extent of Surgical Intervention—A Review" Biomedicines 10, no. 7: 1515. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10071515

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop