Next Article in Journal
Activation of Calcium-Activated Chloride Channels Suppresses Inherited Seizure Susceptibility in Genetically Epilepsy-Prone Rats
Previous Article in Journal
Highly Sensitive and Quantitative Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 Using a Gold/Platinum Particle-Based Lateral Flow Assay and a Desktop Scanning Electron Microscope
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

One Year in the Extreme Isolation of Antarctica—Is This Enough to Modulate an “Allergic” Sensitization?

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
MacroArray Diagnostics GmbH, Lemböckgasse 59/Top 4, A-1230 Vienna, Austria
Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung, 27568 Bremerhaven, Germany
Institut für Luft-und Raumfahrtmedizin, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR), 51147 Cologne, Germany
NASA-Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX 77058, USA
Radiobiology Unit, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK CEN), 2400 Mol, Belgium
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomedicines 2022, 10(2), 448;
Submission received: 19 January 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2022 / Accepted: 8 February 2022 / Published: 15 February 2022


(1) Background: After spending a year wintering in Antarctica, individual expedition members have reported increased or even new allergic reactions to environmental allergens after their return. (2) Methods: Blood samples from five overwintering crews were analyzed using the chip based multiplex ALEX Allergy Explorer (MacroArray Diagnostics GmbH, Austria). (3) Results: About one third of the 39 participants displayed specific IgEs against pollen. In most individuals, kinetics showed a reduction in the specific IgE at the time about nine months after deployment to Antarctica. Five participants had the highest specific IgE levels after returning to the “normal” world. The examination of the specific IgE relative to house dust mites and storage mites showed different kinetics. Six out of 10 had the highest specific IgE concentrations at the inner Antarctic measurement time point. These data corresponded well to the general situation in the stations. At the stations themselves, there were almost no pollen particle load, especially at Concordia. (4) Conclusions: Antarctic long-term confinement can induce an altered immune function, which is in some individuals pronounced after return to the familiar allergen environment. Future prospective studies in larger cohorts are needed to further specify these first results.

1. Introduction

Antarctica is the most hostile continent on Earth—it is the coldest, driest, and windiest, but is also the cleanest place on our planet. The average annual temperature ranges from about −10 °C (coast) to −60 °C at the highest parts of inner Antarctica [1]. Only during summertime temperatures can rise to maximal +10 °C at the coastal side. At inland locations, they hardly ever rise above −30 °C.
About a decade ago, our group started immunological human studies in this extreme environment in one year overwintering crews, primarily focusing on innate and adaptive immune alterations [2,3] but also on general stress responses. These investigations took place at two Antarctic stations: one at the coastal side (the German Neumayer III Station) and one at a high plateau in inner Antarctica (the French–Italian Concordia Station). In contrast to the Neumayer III Station, where some wildlife can be found, Concordia Station is completely isolated from wildlife. The closest coast is about 1000 km away from Concordia Station. Due to its location at a high plateau (~3200 m) overwintering crews face a significant reduction in available oxygen partial pressure leading to various changes in the human body [4,5].
During the last years, several personal communications have reached us in which returnees from Antarctica reported that they experienced severe or even new allergy typical symptoms such as hay fever, wheezing, or even throat swelling. For example, one overwintering participant described that a new onset of asthmatic symptoms occurred in the presence of their neighbor’s cat after their return. Another one, who had previously had allergic reactions (rash, wheezing) to cats and dogs complained about newly developed hay fever, wheezing, and throat swelling in the presence of grass and flowers, also after return.
These communications brought our attention to retrospectively investigate potential sensitizations and type-1 hypersensitivity (“allergic”) typical symptoms in five previously studied overwintering crews at Neumayer III and Concordia Station.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Station Description and Original Study Protocol

Two different Antarctic research stations served as study locations for the original investigations [2,3,5]: Concordia, the French–Italian inner-continental station located at an altitude of 3233 m (pressure level ∼640 to 650 hPa) and Neumayer III, the German coastal station at Atka Bay in the northeast Weddell Sea on the Ekström shelf ice at sea level.
In contrast to the Northern Hemisphere, the seasons are inversed—the Antarctic summer lasts from November to February and the winter from May to August. Due to the close location to the South Pole, a light/dark cycle is missing during the Antarctic summer, resulting in 24 h of constant sunlight. Summertime average outside temperatures are around −40 °C at Concordia and −3 °C at Neumayer III. During wintertime, no sunlight is present for almost three months. This leads to outside temperatures around −60 °C and sometimes also to −80 °C at Concordia. At Neumayer III, winter darkness lasts some weeks less/fewer with average temperatures of −30 °C. These extreme temperatures are not the only challenges for the expeditioners. Particularly at Concordia, the humidity is very low, which causes a very dry environment, leading to mucosal defects—nose bleeding is hereby common during the first weeks of deployment. Both stations are completely isolated (no real evacuation possible) from the rest of the world from mid-February to mid-October. All telecommunication/internet is only possible via satellite and depends on the weather situation.
The original study CHOICE (Consequences of long-term Confinement and Hypobaric HypOxia on Immunity in the Antarctic Concordia Environment) included sample collection at baseline (about two months before departure (pre)), on a monthly basis, and about 3–4 months after return (post). For this retrospective investigation, an “inner Antarctic” time point was chosen with the longest isolation time from the outer world—for both stations, this was the September collection (Sept). Samples of three overwintering crews from Concordia and samples of two crews from Neumayer III were analyzed. In detail, blood samples (serum tubes) from 23 Concordia crew members (21 males/two females) and 16 Neumayer participants were analyzed (11 males/five females). Complete sample sets were present in 34 cases, whereas five sets from Concordia were incomplete (2 × September and 3 × post missing).

2.2. Biochemical Measurements

As only small amounts of blood existed for further sensitization analyses, the study team decided to use the chip based multiplex ALEX Allergy Explorer (MacroArray Diagnostics GmbH, Vienna, Austria) containing more than 280 allergen extracts and molecular allergens.
ALEX tests were performed from 200 µL serum plasma at the MacroArray Diagnostics Laboratory at 1230 Vienna, Austria. This test measures the semi-quantitative total IgE concentrations as well as quantitative allergen specific IgE. The ALEX test clusters eight different allergen groups (pollen, mites, microorganisms, plant-based food, animal-derived food, insects and venoms, epithelial tissues of animals, others) and further investigated cross-reactive allergen families containing 12 different components (Supplementary Table S1).
General classification of total IgE (kU/L) concentrations in the ALEX analyses for adults are as follows:
<20 kU/L—Allergy unlikely20–100 kU/L—Allergy possible>100 kU/L—Allergy likely

2.3. Questionnaire

All participants were contacted via email during springtime 2020 and asked to fill in a questionnaire including questions about allergy typical reactions, history of allergy, and changes after return from Antarctica.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

All data were tested for normal distribution using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Between-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney Rank Sum test for non-parametric data and a t-test for normally distributed data. A p-value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant.
The majority of the data are presented in this report as raw data to provide the maximal possible scientific overview and not to “diminish” biological effects after statistical calculations.
Data in figures are displayed as single values. SigmaPlot® (Systat, Software, Chicago, IL, USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics (V24, Armonk, NY, USA) were used for the statistical analyses and figure design.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Data

Aside from the smaller group size (23 vs. 16), no significant statistical differences in demographics were present between the stations (Table 1).

3.2. The ALEX Test

Total IgE

Thirteen out of the 39 participants had at one of the three time points a total IgE (tIgE) level above 100 kU/L. According to the test definition, an allergy is likely when tIgE is >100 kU/L. When looking at the September tIgE concentrations, 13 participants showed elevated levels compared to the baseline (Figure 1).
Alterations of tIgE concentrations were defined here if values were affected by more than ±10 kU/L. Aside from two participants in which tIgE levels increased further, all levels dropped again after return.

3.3. Specific IgEs

By further analyzing the ALEX test, we observed in 26 participants elevated specific IgE (sIgE) levels according to the test ranges/classification (low, moderate, high, very high; Supplement Table S1).
Seven overwinterers had only one elevated sIgE level of a cluster and 19 multiple ones (Supplement Table S2). Of the seven participants, four showed moderate and three low sIgE levels. Only one showed a total IgE at one time point above 100kU/L. The majority of the participants with positive sIgE was classified in one cluster high (six) or very high (eight). The number one sensitization was toward pollen (17, high/very high 9), followed by food (15, high/very high 3), insects (12, high/very high 0), mites (10, high/very high 7), pets (7, high/very high 2), and fungal spores and yeast 3 (high/very high 2).

3.4. Grass Pollen

Individual analyses of the allergen extracts (AE) and the molecular allergens (MA) of the grass pollen cluster revealed, aside from 2 (Con4, Sec c pollen; Con6, Lol p1) out of 13, a reduction in specific IgE levels in September. September values were in most cases also lower than the post data. In two individuals (Con2, Con9), some AE and MA were moderately higher after overwintering when compared to the baseline values (Con2 Phl p, Phl p2, Con9 Lol p1).
The specific IgE concentrations for grass pollen were classified at any time point very high for three participants, high in three, moderate (three), and low in four individuals (Figure 2).

3.5. Tree Pollen

Twelve participants had sensitizations toward tree pollen. In general, concentrations were high in six cases, moderate in four cases, and low in two cases. Interestingly, three overwinterers showed higher sIgE levels in September than at the baseline (Neu12, Bet v; Con4 Aln g1, Bet v2, Con13 Pla a). Five individuals had the highest levels for some specific IgEs after the Antarctic expedition (Neu11, Neu12, Con9, Con14, Con21). Two of them (Neu11, Con21) were within the low range (0.3–1 kUA/L). Con21 had no specific IgE before Antarctica, but low levels afterward (Figure 3).

3.6. House Dust Mites & Storage Mites

Ten participants showed specific IgEs against AE and MA toward house dust mites and storage mites. Three had very high, four high, and three moderate sIgE concentrations. Six individuals had peak levels for some AE/MA in September (Con13, Con14, Neu11, Neu12, Neu13, Neu16). The majority of the post values were lower than the pre data (Figure 4).

3.7. Microorganisms

Three participants were sensitized toward Alternaria alternans. One had very high, one high, and one had moderate levels. In September, the levels showed the lowest values. One participant presented the highest levels after the expedition, whereas the other two had remarkably lower ones compared to the baseline (Figure 5).

3.8. Pets

Specific IgE reactions toward pet AE and MA were observed in seven participants. One with very high levels, one with high, two with moderate, and three with low levels. Interestingly, three showed the highest levels after return. One participant developed a new sensitization toward various pet AE and ME (Con21) (Figure 6).

3.9. Questionnaires and ALEX Results

The return rate of the questionnaire was low (11 out of 39 (28.2%)). Five declared that they had no history of allergy or any typical sensitization, whereas six indicated a history of allergy including hay fever, wheezing (asthmatic reactions), and increased swelling after insect bites.
Two of the participants with a history of allergy experienced more hay fever after return (Con4, Con15). Total IgE levels after return were in both cases lower than pre departure. Specific IgEs showed no increase in the post data collection, respectively.
Two other expeditioners reported on the newly developed hay fever after their return (Con21, Con23). In one case (Con21), total IgE concentration was the highest at the post time point (176 vs. 26 (pre) kU/L). A new sensitization after return against the ash extract and molecular allergen could be detected. In the other case (Con23), no alterations in terms of an increase were observed. Total IgE levels dropped from pre 719 to post 521 kU/L.
Another subject (Con9) who had hay fever from olive trees explained that this reaction was gone after its return. Total IgE levels in this case were also the lowest after return, but the specific IgE toward ash (Fra e, Fra e1), olive (Ole e1), and the Ole e1 family were higher post expedition. This is in contrast to the clinical description of an improvement in allergic symptoms (Table 2) and speaks to the limited association between elevated tIgE and clinical symptoms.

4. Discussion

As initially described, this retrospective investigation was initiated after the incidence of personal communications increased where returnees wintering over for a year in Antarctic stations experienced more allergic reactions than they had at home before deployment to Antarctica. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the second report 44 years after Lund´s et al. [6] first investigation into the effects of prolonged isolation in Antarctica and the modulation of the allergic state.
Due to the few available sample volumes from five overwintering crews, the study team tried to obtain the maximal possible scientific outcome one could achieve on a retrospective basis. In this light, we have chosen a newer chip based multiplex assay (ALEX Allergy Explorer) as it contained a very broad variety of allergen extracts and molecular allergens. The ALEX test showed comparable results to the Immuno Solid-phase Allergen Chip (ISAC, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) test [7], whereas the ISAC test was able to investigate only 112 different single molecules from 48 different allergen sources.
In addition to the specific IgEs, the ALEX test also measures the total IgE concentrations. In contrast to previous findings from Lund [6] on total IgE concentrations, which showed only a variation around the baseline values in 21 subjects, we were able to detect in 33% of the subjects an increase in total IgE levels during the Antarctic stay (September). The increase was hereby defined if values changed by more than ±10 kU/L. As demonstrated in an earlier investigation at Concordia [2], the environmental conditions/isolation caused an upregulated global immune response. This immune response was especially evident in a specific T-cell stimulation assay imitating the original delayed type hypersensitivity skin test (Merieux®, Chicago, IL, USA) with the evaluation of its type IV reaction [8]. The altered total IgE levels might be a further indicator that in some individuals, this environmental setup alters general immune functions, also on a type 1 reaction. Of course, the majority (19 participants) had no tIgE changes at the September time point. When looking into the literature, one can find that even in severe asthmatics, total serum IgEs show limited within-patient variability [9]. However, one also has to mention that severe asthma patients have many medications, especially systemic steroids and some monoclonal antibodies against various cytokines that could blunt any change in total IgE concentrations. It is also known that total IgE can be elevated by psychological stress and that due to its half-life of around 60 h, a variety of non-allergic influences could have impacted the here presented levels. Additionally, no age correction was performed in this investigation, possibly affecting the results as allergen-specific and total IgE levels decrease with age [9,10]. In general, one has to take into account that normal total IgE levels can also range from 2 to 214 units/mL. This was shown in a 2014 published manuscript with 1376 healthy children and 128 adults in the United States [11]. Certainly, one cannot over interpret the here presented findings. Nevertheless, they might be an interesting observation caused by the special Antarctic environment and living conditions.
From the specific IgE levels of the pollen cluster, one can assess that in the majority of the participants, sIgEs levels were lower in September and also after return. Interestingly, five individuals had the highest levels after return toward distinct tree pollen allergen extracts and molecular allergens. Certainly, elevated total IgE and specific IgE concentrations should not be stressed as singular markers in the diagnosis of allergies or allergic reactions. However, these findings in the overwintering/returning crew could give a hint that somehow sensitization to pollen could be affected by the year-long isolation from such allergens and lead to the personal communications presented in the introduction.
Due to the long distance to the next Antarctic coast (~1000 km) with wildlife possibly transporting pollen, one can assume that there is no significant pollen present at Concordia Station. Though Neumayer III is situated at the coast on shelf-ice, the closest island (Bouvet Island) with some spare vegetation is more than 1600 km away. Significant amounts of pollen are not expected to be on this station. Overall, the here presented data on pollen sIgEs are in good accordance with the general known sIgE kinetics that specific IgE tends to decrease when not exposed and go up in response to exposure [12].
Elevated sIgEs after return were also present in two other clusters—microorganisms (one out of three) and pets (three out of seven). The kinetic over time was otherwise similar to the pollen cluster.
In terms of pet allergens, one has to acknowledge that there is also no animal life at Concordia Station. At Neumayer III, winter breeding places of the Emperor penguin can be found not far from the station. The ALEX test does not investigate bird allergens, which could have detected possible new sensitizations. Most sensitizations were in context with cat allergens. After several months, specific IgE levels such as the Fel d1 (cat allergen) are, in general, shed [12,13]. At the inner Antarctic time point (Sept), none of the sIgE investigating pet sensitizations was elevated. This is confirmative as there is no typical pet allergen exposition at the stations.
Somehow different was the cluster “house dust mites and storage mites”. Six out of 10 individuals presented the highest peak sIgE levels in September. One explanation therefore can be that these stations are not at all allergen free areas and trigger specific IgE generation. Though the humidity is low at these stations and additionally, a low oxygen pressure is present at Concordia, van Houdt et al. [14] described the airborne bacterial population at Concordia. The predominant microflora at the station was associated with human activity and as a consequence, influence the surface contamination. These factors could have led to the observed increase in house dust and storage mites in September.
In contrast to Neumayer Station, wildlife does not exist at the inner-Antarctic Concordia Station, possibly leading to a lower overall environmental antigen load and altered immune stimulation normally occurring in a regular environment [15,16,17]. Though the station groups were not big in number, one could see a difference in the unspecific immune reactivity by tIgE levels, as nine of the Concordia participants and only four from Neumayer showed an increase in September.
As Hamilton et al. [18] stated that total IgE and specific IgE concentrations as single markers are not sufficient to diagnose an allergy, we tried to retrospectively obtain information on the history of allergy. Six participants (from 11 returned questionnaires) indicated a history of allergy before the expedition to Antarctica. The description of the reactions and the measured tIgE and sIgE did not correlate well. The main reason for this might be that the time point of the post blood draw (3–4 months after return) and the late questionnaire survey are too divergent.


This investigation and the generated data do have several shortcomings as to the retrospective data acquisition and the divergent questionnaire/sampling time points. This must be carefully differentiated between the presence of allergen specific IgE, a single lab parameter, from a clinical allergic sensitization. Since up to 30% of individuals can have allergen-specific IgE via serum test and/or skin test and have no clinical symptoms, most allergists would be unwilling to call someone “allergic” because their total IgE was elevated. The ALEX test cluster of total IgE uses this common definition allergy likely/unlikely depending on total IgE. In this report, this separation was not used. Instead, the authors tried to show new findings on sensitizations in an extraordinary environment.
Further limitations have to be addressed when looking into the data of specific IgE levels. Potential sensitizations with pollen (after unpacking stored food packages during winter over) or after sweeping distinct areas could have influenced the measurements in September as the supplies were not packed in an allergen-free environment. In future studies, one certainly has to measure the allergen load (e.g., out of dust samples (Der P1 or Der F1)). Food sensitizations detected by the ALEX test were not further analyzed and discussed as food sensitizations/allergies are considered as different entities.
Taken together, the here presented data provide additional information on a possible altered immune function in the sense of a type 1 reaction during the Antarctic deployment, which is in some individuals pronounced after return to the familiar allergen environment.
A further study in a prospective designed model is warranted—if such a risk of new sensitization and “overshooting” reaction exists—as such findings could have an impact on future long-term expeditions or space missions (e.g., to the Moon and Mars) when an allergic sensitization during mission could have potentially more serious consequences when maximal medical treatment is not guaranteed. That the here presented results are not random display other observations made in extreme conditions of living environments such as on the International Space Station published by NASA from one of the authors’ team (B. Crucian) [19,20,21]. These manuscripts describe changes in the first line of immune defense, the microbiome and relate this to stress events, indicating the role of the environmental challenge on the one hand (so being confined and stressed), but will also allow us to bridge these phenomena to other immune dysregulations as reported (e.g., viral reactivations). The here presented data and the possibly underlying immunological mechanisms add another element to this understanding of complex immune responses, though the exact causes of these sensitizations can only be answered in a speculative way. As initially described, this special Antarctic environment leads to significant changes in distinct immunological pathways [2]. To date, alterations of immunological pathways at Antarctica cannot be directly linked to allergic sensitizations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at Table S1: Example of an ALEX test result summary; Table S2: Specific IgEs in all overwinterers: Due to no specific IgEs, the following categories were deleted to increase clarity: grain, spices, milk, egg, cockroach, animals, ficus, and hops, CCD; Deleted items for cross-reactive allergen families: polcalcin, storage proteins, parvalbumin, CCD.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F., B.C., S.B. and A.C.; methodology, M.F., C.S., M.A. and A.C.; software, M.F., M.A. and A.C.; validation, M.F., C.S. and A.C.; formal analysis, M.F., M.A. and A.C.; investigation, M.F., C.S., T.H., U.L, B.C., S.B., A.C.; resources, M.F., S.B., A.C.; data curation, M.F. and A.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F. and A.C.; writing—review and editing, M.F., C.S., M.A., T.H., U.L., B.C., S.B. and A.C.; visualization, M.F. and A.C.; supervision, S.B., B.C., A.C.; project administration, M.F., C.S., T.H., U.L. and A.C.; funding acquisition, S.B. and A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This study was financially supported by the German National Space Program (Funding Number DLR, 50WB1317, 50WB1622) and by the Alfred Wegener Institute (AWI) and Institut polaire français Paul-Émile-Victor (IPEV). Sarah Baatout is supported by ESA PRODEX contracts (PEA 4000130301 and PEA 4000109861).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany (NR. 524-15, Date: 6 October 2015).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to ethical reasons.


The authors thank the French (IPEV), Italian (PNRA), and German (AWI) polar institutes as well as the European Space Agency (ESA) and the German National Space Program (DLR). Our special thanks go to the Antarctic crews at Neumayer III and Concordia who participated with great professionalism and enthusiasm. We are thankful for the great work of the medical doctors overwintering and conducting the on-site sample collection and processing (F. van den Berg, C. Dangoisse, B. Gropp, C. Possnig). We appreciate the help of the teams at the European Astronaut Center of the European Space Agency Cologne, Germany, and of the Charité Cross Over Institute of Physiology (H.-C. Gunga, A. Stahn) in Berlin Charité for organizing and performing the pre- and post-Antarctic deployment sessions. We are thankful for the excellent help of M. Hörl, K. Biere, D. Moser, and all other involved members from the translational research laboratory of the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Munich, Germany. Special thanks also go to G. D. Marshall (University of Mississippi, USA) for his advice on this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

M. Aumayr is an employee at MacroArray Diagnostics and has helped in the data interpretation and analyses. None of the other authors have received any financial support or benefit from MacroArray Diagnostics. M.F. and A.C., who planned the study analyses, selected the ALEX assay according to the given data in the literature and not due to the influence of any company. Hence, all authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.


  1. Divison, A.A. Antarctic Weather. Available online: (accessed on 26 January 2021).
  2. Feuerecker, M.; Crucian, B.E.; Quintens, R.; Buchheim, J.I.; Salam, A.P.; Rybka, A.; Moreels, M.; Strewe, C.; Stowe, R.; Mehta, S.; et al. Immune sensitization during 1 year in the Antarctic high-altitude Concordia Environment. Allergy 2019, 74, 64–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Strewe, C.; Moser, D.; Buchheim, J.I.; Gunga, H.C.; Stahn, A.; Crucian, B.E.; Fiedel, B.; Bauer, H.; Gossmann-Lang, P.; Thieme, D.; et al. Sex differences in stress and immune responses during confinement in Antarctica. Biol. Sex. Differ. 2019, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Feuerecker, M.; Crucian, B.; Salam, A.P.; Rybka, A.; Kaufmann, I.; Moreels, M.; Quintens, R.; Schelling, G.; Thiel, M.; Baatout, S.; et al. Early adaption to the antarctic environment at dome C: Consequences on stress-sensitive innate immune functions. High. Alt. Med. Biol. 2014, 15, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Strewe, C.; Thieme, D.; Dangoisse, C.; Fiedel, B.; van den Berg, F.; Bauer, H.; Salam, A.P.; Gossmann-Lang, P.; Campolongo, P.; Moser, D.; et al. Modulations of Neuroendocrine Stress Responses during Confinement in Antarctica and the Role of Hypobaric Hypoxia. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9, 1647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Lund, S.M.; Dowdle, E.B. The effect of prolonged isolation from environmental allergens on the clinical and laboratory manifestations of the allergic state. Observation on members of the South African Antarctic expedition. S. Afr. Med. J. 1977, 52, 556–561. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Bojcukova, J.; Vlas, T.; Forstenlechner, P.; Panzner, P. Comparison of two multiplex arrays in the diagnostics of allergy. Clin. Transl. Allergy 2019, 9, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feuerecker, M.; Mayer, W.; Kaufmann, I.; Gruber, M.; Muckenthaler, F.; Yi, B.; Salam, A.P.; Briegel, J.; Schelling, G.; Thiel, M.; et al. A corticoid-sensitive cytokine release assay for monitoring stress-mediated immune modulation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2013, 172, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Louis, R.; Pilette, C.; Michel, O.; Michils, A.; Brusselle, G.; Poskin, A.; Van Schoor, J.; Denhaerynck, K.; Vancayzeele, S.; Abraham, I.; et al. Variability in total serum IgE over 1 year in severe asthmatics. Allergy Asthma Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Amaral, A.F.S.; Newson, R.B.; Abramson, M.J.; Anto, J.M.; Bono, R.; Corsico, A.G.; de Marco, R.; Demoly, P.; Forsberg, B.; Gislason, T.; et al. Changes in IgE sensitization and total IgE levels over 20 years of follow-up. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 137, 1788–1795.e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Martins, T.B.; Bandhauer, M.E.; Bunker, A.M.; Roberts, W.L.; Hill, H.R. New childhood and adult reference intervals for total IgE. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 133, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ansotegui, I.J.; Melioli, G.; Canonica, G.W.; Caraballo, L.; Villa, E.; Ebisawa, M.; Passalacqua, G.; Savi, E.; Ebo, D.; Gomez, R.M.; et al. IgE allergy diagnostics and other relevant tests in allergy, a World Allergy Organization position paper. World Allergy Organ. J. 2020, 13, 100080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Morris, D.O. Human allergy to environmental pet danders: A public health perspective. Vet. Dermatol. 2010, 21, 441–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Van Houdt, R.; De Boever, P.; Coninx, I.; Le Calvez, C.; Dicasillati, R.; Mahillon, J.; Mergeay, M.; Leys, N. Evaluation of the airborne bacterial population in the periodically confined Antarctic base Concordia. Microb. Ecol. 2009, 57, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. MacGillivray, D.M.; Kollmann, T.R. The role of environmental factors in modulating immune responses in early life. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Ter Horst, R.; Jaeger, M.; Smeekens, S.P.; Oosting, M.; Swertz, M.A.; Li, Y.; Kumar, V.; Diavatopoulos, D.A.; Jansen, A.F.M.; Lemmers, H.; et al. Host and Environmental Factors Influencing Individual Human Cytokine Responses. Cell 2016, 167, 1111–1124.e13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Yi, B.; Rykova, M.; Jager, G.; Feuerecker, M.; Horl, M.; Matzel, S.; Ponomarev, S.; Vassilieva, G.; Nichiporuk, I.; Chouker, A. Influences of large sets of environmental exposures on immune responses in healthy adult men. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Hamilton, R.G.; Kleine-Tebbe, J. Molecular Allergy Diagnostics: Analytical Features That Support Clinical Decisions. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 2015, 15, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Agha, N.H.; Baker, F.L.; Kunz, H.E.; Spielmann, G.; Mylabathula, P.L.; Rooney, B.V.; Mehta, S.K.; Pierson, D.L.; Laughlin, M.S.; Markofski, M.M.; et al. Salivary antimicrobial proteins and stress biomarkers are elevated during a 6-month mission to the International Space Station. J. Appl. Physiol. (1985) 2020, 128, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Voorhies, A.A.; Mark Ott, C.; Mehta, S.; Pierson, D.L.; Crucian, B.E.; Feiveson, A.; Oubre, C.M.; Torralba, M.; Moncera, K.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Study of the impact of long-duration space missions at the International Space Station on the astronaut microbiome. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Crucian, B.; Johnston, S.; Mehta, S.; Stowe, R.; Uchakin, P.; Quiriarte, H.; Pierson, D.; Laudenslager, M.L.; Sams, C. A case of persistent skin rash and rhinitis with immune system dysregulation onboard the International Space Station. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2016, 4, 759–762.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Total IgE concentrations in overwinterers separated in groups by the change in September.
Figure 1. Total IgE concentrations in overwinterers separated in groups by the change in September.
Biomedicines 10 00448 g001
Figure 2. Specific IgEs against grass pollen, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations in the first line, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Figure 2. Specific IgEs against grass pollen, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations in the first line, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Biomedicines 10 00448 g002
Figure 3. Specific IgEs against tree pollen, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations in the first line, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Figure 3. Specific IgEs against tree pollen, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations in the first line, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Biomedicines 10 00448 g003
Figure 4. Specific IgEs against house dust mites and storage mites, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations in the first line, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Figure 4. Specific IgEs against house dust mites and storage mites, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations in the first line, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Biomedicines 10 00448 g004
Figure 5. Specific IgEs against house dust mites and storage mites, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations on the left side, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Figure 5. Specific IgEs against house dust mites and storage mites, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations on the left side, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Biomedicines 10 00448 g005
Figure 6. Specific IgEs against pets, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations in the upper left corner, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Figure 6. Specific IgEs against pets, individual data, starting with the highest concentrations in the upper left corner, y-axis adapted to the respective concentrations.
Biomedicines 10 00448 g006
Table 1. Demographic data of the overwintering crews (height and body weight from one Concordia crew missing, female), data are mean ± SD (range).
Table 1. Demographic data of the overwintering crews (height and body weight from one Concordia crew missing, female), data are mean ± SD (range).
ConcordiaNeumayer IIIAll
Gender [m/f]21/211/532/7
Age during WO [years]36.5 ± 10.9 (23–62)33.3 ± 4.8 (25–42)35.2 ± 9.0 (23–62)
Height [cm]175.3 ± 7.1 (165–191)175.6 ± 9.0 (157–188)175.5 ±7.8 (157–191)
Weight [kg]76.6 ± 13.2 (58–107)78.3 ± 17.0 (52–109)77.3 ± 14.7 (52–109)
Body mass index [kg/m2]24.9 ± 3.8 (19.7–33.3)25.1 ± 3.8 (19.8–34.4)25.0 ± 3.8 (19.7–34.4)
Table 2. Overview of the ALEX test summary of all participants who returned the questionnaire, color explanation: no color/rose (0) = <0.3 kUA/L (negative or uncertain), yellow (1) = 0.3–1 kUA/L (low IgE level), orange (2) = 1–5 kUA/L (moderate IgE level), red (3) = 5–15 kUA/L(high IgE level), dark red (4) = >15 kUA/L (Very high IgE level). No color and rose lines show different subjects. Grey columns show separations of test clusters.
Table 2. Overview of the ALEX test summary of all participants who returned the questionnaire, color explanation: no color/rose (0) = <0.3 kUA/L (negative or uncertain), yellow (1) = 0.3–1 kUA/L (low IgE level), orange (2) = 1–5 kUA/L (moderate IgE level), red (3) = 5–15 kUA/L(high IgE level), dark red (4) = >15 kUA/L (Very high IgE level). No color and rose lines show different subjects. Grey columns show separations of test clusters.
Participant.PollenMitesMicro-OrganismsPlant-Based FoodAnimal-Derived FoodInsects & VenomsEpithelial Tissues
of Animals
Others Cross-Reactive Allergen Families Total IgE History
of Allergy
Type of Allergy, Symptoms and Development
Grass PollenTree PollenWeedHouse Dust Mites
& Storage Mites
Fungal Spores
& Yeast
& mushrooms
Nuts & SeedsFish
& Seafood
MeatBee, WaspPetsLatex ProfilinPR-10Ole e 1
Tropo-myosin (kU/L)
Con2_pre30134000000010 00100300 94 no
Con2_Sept30033000000000 00000300 179
Con2_post30033000000000 00000300 441
Con3_pre00000000000000 00000000 9 no
Con3_Sept00000000000100 00000000 13
Con3_post00000000000000 00000000 8
Con4_pre43020101100202 23200000 223 yeshay fever, reactions to insect bites, younger age allergy towards cats/dogs, food reactions
Con4_Sept42020101100100 22200000 324
Con4_post32020110100102 22200000 68 afterwards, same reactions as before, but more hay fever
Con6_pre20000000000000 00000000 16 no
Con6_Sept20000000000000 00000000 80
Con6_post20000000000000 00000000 15
Con9_pre21100000000000 00100000 193 yeshay fever (pollen from olive trees)
Con9_Sept20100000000000 00000000 124
Con9_post22000000000000 00200000 63 no hay fever after return
Con15_pre00020000000000 00000200 6 yeshay fever (varying with years), dust mites
Con15_Sept00020000000000 00000200 4
Con15_post00020000000000 00000200 5 worse hay fever after return
Con17_pre00000000000100 00000000 34 no
Con17_Sept00000000000000 00000000 51
Con17_post00000000000000 00000000 33
Con21_pre20000000000010 00000000 26 yes afterwards
Con21_Sept10000000000010 00000000 31
Con21_post12000000001030 00202030 176 newly experienced hay fever directly after return for a couple of days
Con23_pre12200000002040 01202040 719 yescats, dogs, rats -> wheezing
Con23_post12000000000030 00202030 521 new allergic reactions to gras/flowers ->hay fever, wheezing, throat swelling
Neu4_pre02000000100010 02000000 41 yesgrass and rabbit allergy
Neu4_Sept02000000000010 02000000 45
Neu4_post02000000000010 02000000 15
Neu6_pre00000000020000 00000000 15 no
Neu6_Sept00000010020100 00000000 11
Neu6_post00000000020000 00000000 7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feuerecker, M.; Strewe, C.; Aumayr, M.; Heitland, T.; Limper, U.; Crucian, B.; Baatout, S.; Choukér, A. One Year in the Extreme Isolation of Antarctica—Is This Enough to Modulate an “Allergic” Sensitization? Biomedicines 2022, 10, 448.

AMA Style

Feuerecker M, Strewe C, Aumayr M, Heitland T, Limper U, Crucian B, Baatout S, Choukér A. One Year in the Extreme Isolation of Antarctica—Is This Enough to Modulate an “Allergic” Sensitization? Biomedicines. 2022; 10(2):448.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feuerecker, Matthias, Claudia Strewe, Martina Aumayr, Tim Heitland, Ulrich Limper, Brian Crucian, Sarah Baatout, and Alexander Choukér. 2022. "One Year in the Extreme Isolation of Antarctica—Is This Enough to Modulate an “Allergic” Sensitization?" Biomedicines 10, no. 2: 448.

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop