Next Article in Journal
Antiphospholipid Antibody Syndrome-Associated Increased Surface Expression of VLA4 Integrin on Human Monocytes
Next Article in Special Issue
Adenovirus-Inspired Virus-like-Particles Displaying Melanoma Tumor Antigen Specifically Target Human DC Subsets and Trigger Antigen-Specific Immune Responses
Previous Article in Journal
Dermatological Autoimmune Considerations of Immune Checkpoint Therapy
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Interplay of Tumor Vessels and Immune Cells Affects Immunotherapy of Glioblastoma
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Immunomodulation by Hemoadsorption—Changes in Hepatic Biotransformation Capacity in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study

Biomedicines 2022, 10(10), 2340; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102340
by Janina Praxenthaler 1,2, Elke Schwier 1, Simon Altmann 1,3, Carmen Kirchner 4, Julian Bialas 5, Dietrich Henzler 1,* and Thomas Köhler 1,6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Biomedicines 2022, 10(10), 2340; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10102340
Submission received: 30 July 2022 / Revised: 13 September 2022 / Accepted: 14 September 2022 / Published: 20 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Immunology and Immunotherapy in Europe)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the present study authors have explored the immunomodulatory effects of hemoadsorption with CytoSorb on liver functions during sepsis. Although the sample size is limited but overall study has been designed aptly and results have been interpreted very well. This study makes a good platform to conduct the study in a large cohort. Besides, authors can rethink to shorten the title of the study as it is little long.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer!

Thank you very much for your constructive feedback and the good rating. 

According to your suggestion, we shortened the title.

Yours  sincerely

Janina Praxenthaler

Reviewer 2 Report

The article covers significant area of sepsis and septic shock. Only few concern:

1. "In Dynamic Liver" Test there are n=1, n=3, authors should increase the n number atleast for n=1.

2. the same n number issue persist for "static liver parameters. "

Please consider to increase the n number and try to be consistent on that to the result section.

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer!

Thank you very much for your constructive feedback and the good rating. 

The total number of patients included into this study was 21 resulting in small patient numbers when in comes to percentages (5% (n=1)). 

In case this explanation does not meet your request, please specify your concern.

Yours sincerely 
Janina Praxenthaler 

 

Back to TopTop