Next Article in Journal
Social Anxiety and Smartphone Addiction in Chinese University Students: A Moderated Mediation Model of Rumination and Gender
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding Breast Cancer: Awareness, Risk Factors, and Symptoms Among Female Health Science Students in Hungary
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Needs of Elderly People in a Home Environment: Perspectives from Patients, Caregivers, and a Family Nurse
Previous Article in Special Issue
Improving GPs’ Emotional Intelligence and Resilience to Better Manage Chronic Respiratory Diseases Through an Experiential Online Training Intervention: A Mixed Methods Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Enhancing Health Literacy and Self-Management in Glaucoma Patients: Evidence from a Nurse-Led Educational Intervention

Healthcare 2025, 13(8), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080861
by Lοukia Tsichla 1, Evridiki Patelarou 1, Efstathios Detorakis 2, Miltiadis K. Tsilimbaris 2, Athina E. Patelarou 1 and Konstantinos Giakoumidakis 1,*
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Healthcare 2025, 13(8), 861; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13080861
Submission received: 12 March 2025 / Revised: 6 April 2025 / Accepted: 7 April 2025 / Published: 9 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Improving Primary Care Through Healthcare Education)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

To the authors,

The abstract could be improved by explicitly stating the study design at the beginning, which would strengthen methodological understanding for more technically inclined readers.

The methodology requires clarification in several areas. The inclusion criteria for the sample are not entirely clear. Although the diagnostic criteria are described, the process for verifying these criteria for sample inclusion is not fully explained. There are lingering doubts regarding how the diagnosis was confirmed.

The article has some limitations. The use of convenience sampling limits the generalisability of the findings. A formal randomisation process would have provided a more robust methodological approach.

Fundamentally, the main focus of the article appears to be therapeutic adherence, yet this is only marginally addressed. It should be more clearly included and contextualised in the introduction or background section of the paper.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 1,
Thank you very much for your valuable comments, which have significantly contributed to the improvement of our paper. Please find attached our point-by-point responses to your suggestions. We believe that all the issues you raised have now been fully addressed, and the revisions meet your expectations.

On behalf of all authors,
Dr. Konstantinos Giakoumidakis
Associate Professor, Department of Nursing
School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Congratulations on a nicely conducted study with a valuable message for eye health care workers who treat glaucoma.

Lines 204-205: The text states that the PAM has been tested and verified for a Greek population. In the section immediately before this, even though a Greek version of the HLS-16 EU was used in the study, this claim is not made. Has this questionnaire been validated for a Greek population? If so, it should be stated. If not, an explanation is needed to justify its use nonetheless.

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2,
Thank you very much for your valuable comments, which have significantly contributed to the improvement of our paper. Please find attached our point-by-point responses to your suggestions. We believe that all the issues you raised have now been fully addressed, and the revisions meet your expectations.

On behalf of all authors,
Dr. Konstantinos Giakoumidakis
Associate Professor, Department of Nursing
School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This study evaluates the effectiveness of a nurse-led educational intervention in enhancing health literacy and self-management among glaucoma patients in Greece. A randomized controlled design involving 312 patients was employed. The study found statistically significant improvements in both health literacy and patient activation levels post-intervention.

There are several concerns: 1. Study is confined to a single tertiary hospital in Crete. Encourage multicenter validation to enhance external validity. 2. All outcome measures are self-reported. Where feasible, complement with objective adherence measures (e.g., pharmacy refill rates). 3. Some graphs (e.g., Figures 1–2) are referenced but lack full clarity in labeling. Improve figure captions and ensure consistency with text. 4. Reflect more deeply on cultural factors affecting health literacy in Greek populations in discussion section.

 

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 3,
Thank you very much for your valuable comments, which have significantly contributed to the improvement of our paper. Please find attached our point-by-point responses to your suggestions. We believe that all the issues you raised have now been fully addressed, and the revisions meet your expectations.

On behalf of all authors,
Dr. Konstantinos Giakoumidakis
Associate Professor, Department of Nursing
School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop