The Impact of Organizational Commitment and Work Motivation on Retention Intention: Evidence from Long-Term Care Institution Caregivers Based on Expectancy Theory
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Theoretical Foundation
2.1.1. Expectancy Theory
2.1.2. Self-Determination Theory
2.1.3. Theoretical Foundation of the Study
2.2. Hypotheses Development
2.2.1. Organizational Commitment
2.2.2. Work Motivation
2.2.3. Retention Intention
2.2.4. Work Values
2.2.5. Work Values as Mediating Variable
2.2.6. Work Engagement
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Sample and Procedure
3.2. Instrument
3.3. Ethical Considerations
3.4. Data Analysis
3.5. Common Method Bias
4. Results
4.1. Measurement Model
4.2. Structural Model
5. Discussion
5.1. Work Values as a Key Mediating Role
5.2. Comparison of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Values
5.3. Work Engagement as a “Signal Amplifier”
5.4. Theoretical Implications
5.5. Practical Implications
5.6. Limitations and Future Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Item | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Organizational Commitment | [67] | |
| OC1 | I hope to continue developing my career in the current long-term care institution. | |
| OC2 | I regard the problems faced by the current long-term care institution as my own problems. | |
| OC3 | I feel like a member of a family in the current long-term care institution. | |
| OC4 | The current long-term care institution provides me with a great deal of support in my life. | |
| OC5 | I believe that my contribution to the current long-term care institution is still limited. | |
| OC6 | I feel that the current long-term care institution is worthy of my long-term loyalty and service. | |
| OC7 | I find it difficult to leave the current long-term care institution because I am concerned that I may not be able to find a job elsewhere. | |
| OC8 | Leaving the current long-term care institution may have negative consequences for me. | |
| OC9 | It is not easy to find another long-term care job with stable income like the current one. | |
| Work motivation | [68] | |
| WM1 | The tasks I perform at work themselves drive my motivation to work. | |
| WM2 | The tasks I perform at work are enjoyable. | |
| WM3 | My work is meaningful. | |
| WM4 | My work is very exciting. | |
| WM5 | My work is so interesting that it is a motivation in itself. | |
| WM6 | Sometimes I feel so inspired by my work that I almost forget everything around me. | |
| WM7 | If I need to put in extra effort at work, I need to receive extra compensation. | |
| WM8 | For me, it is important to have external reward goals in order to be motivated to do my work well. | |
| WM9 | External rewards such as bonuses and allowances are necessary for my work performance. | |
| WM10 | If I could receive better pay, I would perform better. | |
| Intrinsic work values | [69] | |
| IWV1 | This long-term care job provides opportunities to exercise initiative. | |
| IWV2 | This long-term care job provides me with a sense of accomplishment. | |
| IWV3 | This long-term care job provides me with a sense of responsibility. | |
| IWV4 | This long-term care job matches my abilities. | |
| IWV5 | This long-term care job is interesting. | |
| Extrinsic work values | [69] | |
| EWV1 | This long-term care job provides generous vacation. | |
| EWV2 | This long-term care job offers good working hours. | |
| EWV3 | This long-term care job does not involve excessive stress. | |
| EWV4 | This long-term care job provides good salary. | |
| EWV5 | This long-term care job offers good job security. | |
| Retention Intention | [70] | |
| RI1 | I have hardly ever thought about leaving this long-term care institution. | |
| RI2 | I feel that staying in this long-term care institution is the right choice. | |
| RI3 | Even if there were better job opportunities, I would not want to leave this long-term care institution. | |
| RI4 | I feel a responsibility to continue working in this long-term care institution. | |
| RI5 | I would feel guilty if I were to leave this long-term care institution. | |
| RI6 | No matter how this long-term care institution changes, I do not want to leave. | |
| RI7 | I am very loyal to this long-term care institution. | |
| Work Engagement | [71] | |
| WE1 | When I am working, I feel full of energy. | |
| WE2 | In my job, I feel strong and vigorous. | |
| WE3 | I am enthusiastic about my work. | |
| WE4 | My job inspires me. | |
| WE5 | When I wake up in the morning, I feel like going to work. | |
| WE6 | I feel happy when I am working intensely. | |
| WE7 | I am proud of the work that I do. | |
| WE8 | I am fully concentrated on my work. | |
| WE9 | I get carried away when I am working. | |
References
- Teng, J.-K.; Liu, H.-L. Elder Care as a Focus of Social Concern: The Multifunctional Long-Term Care and Wellness Village as a New Trend. Available online: https://www.ydn.com.tw/news/newsInsidePage?chapterID=1735819 (accessed on 5 July 2025).
- Tai, C.-Y. Embracing a New Future in 2025: Outlook on Nine Key Trends in the Care Industry Review and Prospects. Available online: https://www.ankecare.com/article/3483-2025-01-12-16-21-15 (accessed on 10 July 2025).
- Tazi, Y.C.; Yang, H.Y.; Lai, F.T. A study on turnover factor of nurse aides. J. Perform. Strategy Res. 2019, 16, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Q.; Zhao, H. From committed employees to rebels: The role of prosocial rule-breaking, age, and entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023, 34, 4232–4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holtom, B.C.; Burch, T.C. A model of turnover-based disruption in customer services. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 2016, 26, 25–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Porter, C.M.; Rigby, J.R. The turnover contagion process: An integrative review of theoretical and empirical research. J. Organ. Behav. 2021, 42, 212–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azmy, A.; Perkasa, D.H.; Haryadi, A.; Priyono, A. The roles of competence and job satisfaction on sales insurance performance: Organizational commitment as mediating variable. Qual.-Access Success 2025, 26, 121–135. [Google Scholar]
- Pinder, C.C. Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior, 2nd ed.; Psychology Press: Hove, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Kotera, Y.; Van Laethem, M.; Ohshima, R. Cross-cultural comparison of mental health between Japanese and Dutch workers: Relationships with mental health shame, self-compassion, work engagement and motivation. Cross Cult. Strateg. Manag. 2020, 27, 511–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Olafsen, A.H.; Ryan, R.M. Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2017, 4, 19–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Luan, Y.; Ma, R. Detecting causal relationships between work motivation and job performance: A meta-analytic review of cross-lagged studies. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2024, 11, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Csikszentmihalyi, M.; Seligman, M. Positive psychology. Am. Psychol. 2000, 55, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
- Vroom, H.V. Work and Motivation; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1964. [Google Scholar]
- Gyepi-Garbrah, T.; Preko, A.; Mohammed, I.; Mohammed, I. Using goal-setting theory and expectancy theory to understand career goal implementation in the hospitality industry. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 2023, 32, 100425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osafo, E.; Paros, A.; Yawson, R.M. Valence–instrumentality–expectancy model of motivation as an alternative model for examining ethical leadership behaviors. Sage Open 2021, 11, 21582440211021896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aboramadan, M.; Hassi, A.; Alharazin, H.J.; Dahleez, K.A.; Albashiti, B. Volunteering drivers and continuation will: The role of engagement. J. Manag. Dev. 2019, 38, 405–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karatepe, O.M.; Olugbade, O.A. The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between high-performance work practices and job outcomes of employees in Nigeria. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 28, 2350–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aboramadan, M. The effect of green HRM on employee green behaviors in higher education: The mediating mechanism of green work engagement. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2022, 30, 7–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ranay, F. Examining the interplay dynamics of innovative work environment, work motivation and organizational commitment. Div. Word Int. J. Manag. Humanit. 2025, 4, 1524–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yusnita, N. Investigating work value, job satisfaction and organizational commitment among national electric company employees. J. Bisnis Manag. 2022, 9, 205–211. [Google Scholar]
- Fan, A.; Kline, S.F.; Liu, Y.; Byrd, K. Consumers’ lodging intentions during a pandemic: Empirical insights for crisis management practices based on protection motivation theory and expectancy theory. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 34, 1290–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, H.; Khanagha, S. Mechanisms of vision communication and employees’ change-supportive behavior from the perspective of expectancy theory. J. Bus. Res. 2025, 188, 115116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deci, E.L.; Ryan, R.M. The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. J. Res. Pers. 1985, 19, 109–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2000, 25, 54–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, T.V.T.; Ryan, R.M.; Deci, E.L. Solitude as an approach to affective self-regulation. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2018, 44, 92–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Green-Demers, I.; Legault, L.; Pelletier, D.; Pelletier, L.G. Factorial invariance of the Academic Amotivation Inventory (AAI) across gender and grade in a sample of Canadian high school students. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 2008, 68, 862–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redondo, R.; Sparrow, P.; Hernández-Lechuga, G. The effect of protean careers on talent retention: Examining the relationship between protean career orientation, organizational commitment, job satisfaction and intention to quit for talented workers. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 32, 2046–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wieschollek, V.; Dlouhy, K. Employee referrals as counterproductive work behavior? Employees’ motives for poor referrals and the role of the cultural context. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023, 34, 2708–2731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcoux, G.; Guihur, I.; Leclerc, A. Co-operative difference and organizational commitment: The filter of socio-demographic variables. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 32, 822–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.; Beehr, T.A. Empowering leadership: Leading people to be present through affective organizational commitment? Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 2017–2044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Redondo, R.; Sparrow, P.; Hernández-Lechuga, G. Proactive career orientation and physical mobility preference as predictors of important work attitudes: The moderating role of pay satisfaction. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023, 34, 1554–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ausar, K.; Kang, H.J.A.; Kim, J.S. The effects of authentic leadership and organizational commitment on turnover intention. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2016, 37, 181–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramalho Luz, C.M.D.; Luiz de Paula, S.; de Oliveira, L.M.B. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and their possible influences on intent to turnover. Rev. Gestão 2018, 25, 84–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jun, W.H. The mediating effects of nurses’ professional values on the relationship between work environment and organizational commitment among long-term care hospital nurses. BMC Nurs. 2025, 24, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saito, Y.; Igarashi, A.; Noguchi-Watanabe, M.; Takai, Y.; Yamamoto-Mitani, N. Work values and their association with burnout/work engagement among nurses in long-term care hospitals. J. Nurs. Manag. 2018, 26, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, A.; Zhou, Z.E.; Shao, P.T.; Lin, Q. The father’s and the mother’s intrinsic work motivation and their work-to-family conflict perceived by the adolescent: Dyadic and triadic analyses. J. Organ. Behav. 2023, 44, 441–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van den Broeck, A.; Ferris, D.L.; Chang, C.H.; Rosen, C.C. A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. J. Manag. 2016, 42, 1195–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jang, M.; Aavakare, M.; Nikou, S.; Kim, S. The impact of literacy on intention to use digital technology for learning: A comparative study of Korea and Finland. Telecommun. Policy 2021, 45, 102154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, L.; Cao, C.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. Determinants of the digital outcome divide in e-learning between rural and urban students: Empirical evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic based on capital theory. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022, 130, 107177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morkevičiūtė, M.; Endriulaitienė, A. Explaining work motivation through perceived transformational leadership: What to expect in a sample of female employees? Gend. Manag. Int. J. 2020, 35, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saleh, M.O.; Eshah, N.F.; Rayan, A.H. Empowerment predicting nurses’ work motivation and occupational mental health. SAGE Open Nurs. 2022, 8, 23779608221076811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trépanier, S.G.; Vallerand, R.J.; Ménard, J.; Peterson, C. Job resources and burnout: Work motivation as a moderator. Stress Health 2020, 36, 433–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- HakemZadeh, F.; Chowhan, J.; Neiterman, E.; Zeytinoglu, I.; Geraci, J.; Lobb, D. Differential relationships between work-life interface constructs and intention to stay in or leave the profession: Evidence from midwives in Canada. Psychol. Rep. 2024, 127, 1381–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milliman, J.; Gatling, A.; Kim, J.S. The effect of workplace spirituality on hospitality employee engagement, intention to stay, and service delivery. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2018, 35, 56–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kung, S.; Ibrahimi, A.; Biru, A. Examining the mediating role of perceived organizational support in the relationship between employee motivation and intention to stay: A study of millennials in Malaysia. Manag. J. Contemp. Manag. Issues 2024, 29, 143–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mardanov, I. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, organizational context, employee contentment, job satisfaction, performance and intention to stay. Evid.-Based HRM 2021, 9, 223–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rubenstein, A.L.; Eberly, M.B.; Lee, T.W.; Mitchell, T.R. Surveying the forest: A meta-analysis, moderator investigation, and future-oriented discussion of the antecedents of voluntary employee turnover. Pers. Psychol. 2018, 71, 23–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valéau, P.; Paille, P.; Dubrulle, C.; Guenin, H. The mediating effects of professional and organizational commitment on the relationship between HRM practices and professional employees’ intention to stay. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 32, 1828–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Husin, W.N.W.; Kernain, N.F.Z. The influence of individual behaviour and organizational commitment towards the enhancement of Islamic work ethics at Royal Malaysian Air Force. J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 166, 523–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Birtch, T.A.; Cai, Z.; Chiang, F.F. Effects of formal mentoring support on newcomer–protégé affective organizational commitment: A self-concept-based perspective. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2024, 63, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dousin, O.; Wei, C.X.; Balakrishnan, B.K.; Lee, M.C.C. Exploring the mediating role of flexible working hours in the relationship of supervisor support, job and life satisfaction: A study of female nurses in China. Nurs. Open 2021, 8, 2962–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rokeach, M. The Nature of Human Values; Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 1973. [Google Scholar]
- Ede, M.O.; Okeke, C.I.; Adene, F.; Areji, A.C. Perceptions of work value and ethical practices amongst primary school teachers, demographics, intervention, and impact. Psychol. Rep. 2023, 126, 380–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Song, Y.; Gao, S.; Zhao, Y.; Singh Gaur, S. What do we still need to know about employee creativity: A fsQCA approach. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, Y. Economic development, market transition, and work values in post-socialist China. Soc. Forces 2020, 99, 760–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Busque-Carrier, M.; Ratelle, C.F.; Le Corff, Y. Linking work values profiles to basic psychological need satisfaction and frustration. Psychol. Rep. 2022, 125, 3183–3208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, G.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, X.; Martek, I.; Chen, D. The formation mechanism of employees’ turnover intention in AEC industry. Buildings 2025, 15, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller-Mor-Attias, R.; Vigoda-Gadot, E. Evolving motivation in public service: A three-phase longitudinal examination of public service motivation, work values, and academic studies among Israeli students. Public Adm. Rev. 2022, 82, 210–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Cooper, C.L. Sickness presenteeism as a link between long working hours and employees’ outcomes: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivators as resources. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vranken, I.; Vandenbosch, L. Social and vocational identity in workers’ online posts: A large-scale Instagram content analysis of job-related hashtags. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2024, 43, 2966–2986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Memon, M.A.; Salleh, R.; Mirza, M.Z.; Cheah, J.H.; Ting, H.; Ahmad, M.S.; Tariq, A. Satisfaction matters: The relationships between HRM practices, work engagement and turnover intention. Int. J. Manpow. 2021, 42, 21–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahn, W.A. Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Acad. Manag. J. 1990, 33, 692–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldabbas, H.; Pinnington, A.; Lahrech, A. The influence of perceived organizational support on employee creativity: The mediating role of work engagement. Curr. Psychol. 2023, 42, 6501–6515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uka, A.; Prendi, A. Motivation as an indicator of performance and productivity from the perspective of employees. Manag. Mark. 2021, 16, 268–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashiguchi, N.; Sengoku, S.; Kubota, Y.; Kitahara, S.; Lim, Y.; Kodama, K. Age-dependent influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivations on construction worker performance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brislin, R.W. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 1970, 1, 185–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meyer, J.P.; Stanley, D.J.; Herscovitch, L.; Topolnytsky, L. Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. J. Vocat. Behav. 2002, 61, 20–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuvaas, B.; Buch, R.; Weibel, A.; Dysvik, A.; Nerstad, C.G. Do intrinsic and extrinsic motivation relate differently to employee outcomes? J. Econ. Psychol. 2017, 61, 244–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Y.W. The relationships among work values, burnout, and organizational citizenship behaviors: A study from hotel front-line service employees in Taiwan. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2012, 24, 251–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.L.; Chen, M.H. Hospitality industry employees’ intention to stay in their job after the COVID-19 pandemic. Adm. Sci. 2021, 11, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labrague, L.J.; Obeidat, A.A. Transformational leadership as a mediator between work–family conflict, nurse-reported patient safety outcomes, and job engagement. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2022, 54, 493–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A.F. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Commun. Monogr. 2009, 76, 408–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ping, R.A. A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. J. Mark. Res. 1995, 32, 336–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, L.J.; Brown, B.K. Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1994, 57, 185–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, T.K.; Kao, Y.T.; Lin, C.C. Common method variance in management research: Its nature, effects, detection, and remedies. J. Manag. 2006, 23, 77–98. [Google Scholar]
- Kline, R.B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 5th ed.; Guilford Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Black, W.C.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Tatham, R.L. Multivariate Data Analysis, 7th ed.; Pearson Education Limited: Essex, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Yi, Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2012, 40, 8–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- West, S.G.; Taylor, A.B.; Wu, W. Model fit and model selection in structural equation modeling. In Handbook of Structural Equation Modeling; Hoyle, R.H., Ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 209–231. [Google Scholar]
- Dieser, K.H. Applicability of the VIE-model in public administration. Eur. J. Psychol. Res. 2025, 12, 14–35. [Google Scholar]
- Shepherd-Banigan, M.; Jones, K.A.; Wang, K.; DePasquale, N.; Van Houtven, C.; Olsen, J.M. Mechanisms through which a family caregiver coaching intervention might reduce anxiety among children in military households. Matern. Child Health J. 2020, 24, 1248–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.H.; Kang, S.; Oh, I.S.; Kehoe, R.R.; Lepak, D.P. The Goldilocks effect of strategic human resource management? Optimizing the benefits of a high-performance work system through the dual alignment of vertical and horizontal fit. Acad. Manag. J. 2019, 62, 1388–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]


| Category | Frequency | Percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 108 | 21.6 |
| Female | 393 | 78.4 | |
| Age | 21–30 years | 30 | 6.0 |
| 31–40 years | 30 | 6.0 | |
| 41–50 years | 94 | 18.8 | |
| 51–60 years | 160 | 31.9 | |
| Above 61 years | 187 | 37.3 | |
| Seniority | Within 6 months | 39 | 7.8 |
| 6 months to 1 year | 24 | 4.8 | |
| 1 year to 2 years | 57 | 11.4 | |
| 2 years to 5 years | 132 | 26.3 | |
| 5 years to 15 years | 180 | 35.9 | |
| 15 years to 20 years | 43 | 8.6 | |
| More than 20 years | 26 | 5.2 | |
| Education level | Junior high school or below | 147 | 29.3 |
| Senior/vocational high school | 243 | 48.5 | |
| College | 59 | 11.8 | |
| Graduate | 52 | 10.4 | |
| Items | Unstd. | S.E. | t | p | Std. | α | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Organizational Commitment (OC) | 0.929 | 0.931 | 0.599 | |||||
| OC1 | 1 | 0.789 | ||||||
| OC2 | 1.002 | 0.054 | 18.491 | <0.001 | 0.758 | |||
| OC3 | 1.084 | 0.056 | 19.471 | <0.001 | 0.789 | |||
| OC4 | 1.134 | 0.059 | 19.108 | <0.001 | 0.778 | |||
| OC5 | 1.070 | 0.063 | 16.912 | <0.001 | 0.706 | |||
| OC6 | 1.129 | 0.056 | 20.281 | <0.001 | 0.814 | |||
| OC7 | 1.108 | 0.057 | 19.435 | <0.001 | 0.788 | |||
| OC8 | 0.975 | 0.053 | 18.555 | <0.001 | 0.760 | |||
| OC9 | 1.239 | 0.065 | 19.035 | <0.001 | 0.775 | |||
| Work Motivation (WM) | 0.919 | 0.923 | 0.547 | |||||
| WM1 | 1 | 0.800 | ||||||
| WM2 | 0.958 | 0.047 | 20.547 | <0.001 | 0.810 | |||
| WM3 | 0.954 | 0.051 | 18.696 | <0.001 | 0.755 | |||
| WM4 | 0.960 | 0.051 | 18.731 | <0.001 | 0.756 | |||
| WM5 | 0.859 | 0.047 | 18.265 | <0.001 | 0.741 | |||
| WM6 | 0.880 | 0.044 | 19.830 | <0.001 | 0.789 | |||
| WM7 | 0.974 | 0.055 | 17.720 | <0.001 | 0.724 | |||
| WM8 | 0.956 | 0.052 | 18.361 | <0.001 | 0.744 | |||
| WM9 | 1.046 | 0.067 | 15.510 | <0.001 | 0.650 | |||
| WM10 | 1.030 | 0.073 | 14.141 | <0.001 | 0.602 | |||
| Intrinsic Work Values (IWV) | 0.885 | 0.887 | 0.612 | |||||
| IWV1 | 1 | 0.842 | ||||||
| IWV2 | 0.873 | 0.045 | 19.422 | <0.001 | 0.764 | |||
| IWV3 | 0.987 | 0.049 | 20.074 | <0.001 | 0.782 | |||
| IWV4 | 0.921 | 0.047 | 19.763 | <0.001 | 0.773 | |||
| IWV5 | 0.913 | 0.049 | 18.816 | <0.001 | 0.746 | |||
| Extrinsic Work Values (EWV) | 0.859 | 0.861 | 0.554 | |||||
| EWV1 | 1 | 0.744 | ||||||
| EWV2 | 0.963 | 0.056 | 17.189 | <0.001 | 0.789 | |||
| EWV3 | 1.070 | 0.067 | 16.030 | <0.001 | 0.737 | |||
| EWV4 | 1.022 | 0.066 | 15.460 | <0.001 | 0.712 | |||
| EWV5 | 0.926 | 0.058 | 15.989 | <0.001 | 0.736 | |||
| Retention Intention(RI) | 0.945 | 0.945 | 0.712 | |||||
| RI1 | 1 | 0.852 | ||||||
| RI2 | 0.889 | 0.036 | 25.009 | <0.001 | 0.856 | |||
| RI3 | 0.970 | 0.045 | 21.621 | <0.001 | 0.785 | |||
| RI4 | 0.919 | 0.043 | 21.448 | <0.001 | 0.781 | |||
| RI5 | 0.900 | 0.034 | 26.548 | <0.001 | 0.884 | |||
| RI6 | 0.866 | 0.034 | 25.618 | <0.001 | 0.867 | |||
| RI7 | 0.954 | 0.037 | 25.975 | <0.001 | 0.874 | |||
| Work Engagement (WE) | 0.902 | 0.905 | 0.514 | |||||
| WE1 | 1 | 0.695 | ||||||
| WE2 | 1.078 | 0.071 | 15.168 | <0.001 | 0.735 | |||
| WE3 | 1.013 | 0.069 | 14.699 | <0.001 | 0.711 | |||
| WE4 | 0.815 | 0.062 | 13.189 | <0.001 | 0.634 | |||
| WE5 | 1.429 | 0.092 | 15.602 | <0.001 | 0.758 | |||
| WE6 | 1.112 | 0.072 | 15.394 | <0.001 | 0.747 | |||
| WE7 | 1.158 | 0.076 | 15.179 | <0.001 | 0.736 | |||
| WE8 | 0.899 | 0.057 | 15.753 | <0.001 | 0.766 | |||
| WE9 | 0.807 | 0.059 | 13.733 | <0.001 | 0.661 | |||
| Constructs | Mean | SD | AVE | Discriminant Validity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OC | WM | IWV | EWV | RI | WE | ||||
| Organizational Commitment (OC) | 3.881 | 0.657 | 0.599 | 0.774 | |||||
| Work Motivation (WM) | 4.230 | 0.544 | 0.547 | 0.629 | 0.740 | ||||
| Intrinsic Work Values (IWV) | 4.386 | 0.487 | 0.612 | 0.541 | 0.615 | 0.782 | |||
| Extrinsic Work Values (EWV) | 4.346 | 0.518 | 0.554 | 0.524 | 0.635 | 0.874 | 0.744 | ||
| Retention Intention (RI) | 4.279 | 0.782 | 0.712 | 0.471 | 0.521 | 0.607 | 0.623 | 0.844 | |
| Work Engagement (WE) | 4.277 | 0.548 | 0.514 | 0.140 | 0.216 | 0.185 | 0.200 | 0.096 | 0.717 |
| Path Analysis | Std. | Unstd. | S.E. | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control Variables | ||||
| Age→Retention Intention | −0.035 | −0.020 | 0.023 | 0.383 |
| Seniority→Retention Intention | −0.050 | −0.027 | 0.021 | 0.181 |
| Education level→Retention Intention | −0.050 | −0.044 | 0.033 | 0.185 |
| Hypothesis | ||||
| H1: Organizational Commitment→Retention Intention | 0.113 | 0.155 | 0.075 | 0.038 |
| H2:Work Motivation→Retention Intention | 0.051 | 0.077 | 0.121 | 0.526 |
| H3: Organizational Commitment→Intrinsic Work Values | 0.209 | 0.174 | 0.043 | <0.001 |
| H4: Organizational Commitment→Extrinsic Work Values | 0.166 | 0.137 | 0.042 | 0.001 |
| H5: Work Motivation→Intrinsic Work Values | 0.584 | 0.533 | 0.051 | <0.001 |
| H6: Work Motivation→Extrinsic Work Values | 0.657 | 0.589 | 0.054 | <0.001 |
| H7: Intrinsic Work Values→Retention Intention | 0.253 | 0.413 | 0.099 | <0.001 |
| H8: Extrinsic Work Values→Retention Intention | 0.377 | 0.627 | 0.117 | <0.001 |
| H9: Organizational Commitment→Intrinsic Work Values→Retention Intention | 0.053 | 0.072 | 0.041 | 0.014 |
| H10: Organizational Commitment→Extrinsic Work Values→Retention Intention | 0.063 | 0.086 | 0.049 | 0.023 |
| H11: Work Motivation→Intrinsic Work Values→Retention Intention | 0.148 | 0.220 | 0.101 | 0.006 |
| H12: Work Motivation→Extrinsic Work Values→Retention Intention | 0.248 | 0.369 | 0.129 | <0.001 |
| H13: Work Engagement*Organizational Commitment (moderation effect)→Intrinsic Work Values | 0.002 | 0.009 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| H14: Work Engagement*Organizational Commitment (moderation effect)→Extrinsic Work Values | 0.002 | 0.010 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| H15: Work Engagement*Work Motivation (moderation effect)→Intrinsic Work Values | 0.005 | 0.009 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
| H16: Work Engagement*Work Motivation (moderation effect)→Extrinsic Work Values | 0.006 | 0.012 | 0.001 | <0.001 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yeh, S.-H.; Huang, K.-C. The Impact of Organizational Commitment and Work Motivation on Retention Intention: Evidence from Long-Term Care Institution Caregivers Based on Expectancy Theory. Healthcare 2025, 13, 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13222832
Yeh S-H, Huang K-C. The Impact of Organizational Commitment and Work Motivation on Retention Intention: Evidence from Long-Term Care Institution Caregivers Based on Expectancy Theory. Healthcare. 2025; 13(22):2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13222832
Chicago/Turabian StyleYeh, Szu-Han, and Kuo-Chung Huang. 2025. "The Impact of Organizational Commitment and Work Motivation on Retention Intention: Evidence from Long-Term Care Institution Caregivers Based on Expectancy Theory" Healthcare 13, no. 22: 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13222832
APA StyleYeh, S.-H., & Huang, K.-C. (2025). The Impact of Organizational Commitment and Work Motivation on Retention Intention: Evidence from Long-Term Care Institution Caregivers Based on Expectancy Theory. Healthcare, 13(22), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13222832
