Next Article in Journal
Tracking Anxiety in Chronic Intestinal Failure: The Role of Time in Healing
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Sex Differences in Oxford House Residents Regarding Quality of Life, Sense of Community, and Length of Stay
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring Vulnerable, Ethnic Minority, and Low Socioeconomic Children’s Knowledge, Beliefs, and Attitudes Regarding HPV Vaccination in Romania
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 13
Issue 19
10.3390/healthcare13192502
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Advancements and Future Perspectives of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination in Latin America: Insights from Recent Decades

by
Marcela Bonalumi dos Santos
1,*,
Martina Parenza Arenhardt
2,
Giovanna Vieira Giannecchini
1,
Larissa Müller Gomes
1,
Jessé Lopes da Silva
1,3,
Diocesio Alves Pinto de Andrade
1 and
Andréia Cristina de Melo
1,3
1
Department of Medical Oncology, Oncoclinicas&Co, São Paulo 01304-001, Brazil
2
Irineu Boff Family Oncology Center, Nora Teixeira Hospital, Santa Casa de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre 90020-090, Brazil
3
Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro 20231-050, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(19), 2502; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192502
Submission received: 15 July 2025 / Revised: 20 September 2025 / Accepted: 23 September 2025 / Published: 2 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue HPV Vaccine and Cervical Cancer Prevention)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

Despite being a preventable disease, cervical cancer remains a significant public health concern in low- and middle-income countries, including those in Latin America (LATAM), where mortality rates are nearly three times higher than in North America. HPV vaccination represents one of the most important strategies for cervical cancer elimination; however, uptake in these regions has been consistently suboptimal. The aim of this review is to analyze the current status of HPV vaccination programs across LATAM, examines the underlying challenges, and proposes strategies to enhance vaccine coverage. Multiple obstacles to widespread vaccine adoption persist, including limited awareness, cultural stigma, and regional disparities in healthcare access, often driven by socioeconomic and infrastructural limitations. Addressing these challenges through multifaceted interventions—such as school-based vaccination programs, healthcare provider engagement, digital dissemination, simplified dosing schedules, and supportive policy measures—is essential to effectively improve vaccination rates and reduce disease burden.

1. Introduction

Although the incidence of cervical cancer (CC) is low in high-income countries (HICs), it remains widespread in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), ranking as the eighth most common tumor worldwide and accounting for nearly 350,000 deaths annually [1]. Given that infection by the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is a key factor in the development of most CC, this tumor’s pathophysiology helps explain the significant regional differences in incidence rates observed globally [2].
HPV is transmitted through sexual contact and is associated with anogenital and oropharyngeal diseases—including cervical, anal, penile, vulvar, vaginal, and oropharyngeal cancers—underscoring its substantial public health burden. Approximately 75% of CC cases worldwide are related to high-risk HPV genotypes 16 and 18. An additional 20% of cases may be linked to 5 other genotypes described as follows: HPV-31, HPV-33, HPV-45, HPV-52 and HPV-58 [3]. HPV vaccines play a central role in the prevention of HPV-related cancers. Currently, three types are available: bivalent (Cervarix), tetravalent (Gardasil), and nonavalent (Gardasil-9) [4,5,6,7].
The World Health Organization (WHO) has proposed a comprehensive strategy for the elimination of CC, based on three key principles to be adopted by countries worldwide, the well-known “90-70-90 program”: first, 90% of girls should be fully vaccinated with the HPV vaccine by age 15; second, 70% of women should undergo screening with a high-performance test by ages 35 and 45; and third, 90% of women diagnosed with pre-cancer or CC should receive appropriate treatment [8].
While the implementation of the “90-70-90 program” may be feasible in HICs, its execution in LMICs often faces significant challenges [9,10]. Therefore, this review aims to examine the current landscape of HPV vaccination in Latin America (LATAM) and to propose strategies to enhance vaccination coverage across the region.

2. Epidemiology of HPV-Related Cancers in Latin America

Across LATAM, over 1.5 million new cancer cases are expected each year according to data from GLOBOCAN 2022, with prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, and lung cancer being the three most prevalent in males and breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and CC being the most prevalent in females. Considering tumors potentially related to HPV infection (CC, vulvar, vaginal, anal, penile, oropharynx), the estimated annual incidence exceeds 83.000 cases per year, with CC alone accounting for approximately 630,000 [1]. In 2017, de Martel and colleagues estimated that 78,000 cases of cancer in LATAM were associated with HPV infection, including 69,000 cases of CC [11].
The two countries with the highest rates of CC diagnosis in LATAM are Bolivia (36.6 cases per 100.000 women-years) and Paraguay (34.1 cases per 100.000 women-years). Conversely, between 1988 and 2017, a marked decline in CC incidence was observed in countries such as Ecuador, Chile, Brazil, Colombia, and Costa Rica [1]. Figure 1 presents a compilation of current CC incidence rates for several LATAM countries.
Analyzing cancers attributed to some type of infection in 2018, just over 800,000 cases were directly related to Helicobacter pylori and 690,000 cases were directly related to HPV infection, especially CC [12]. Using age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) of HPV-attributable cancers in LATAM, incidence was estimated at 8.0 cases per 100,000 person-years in the Caribbean and Central America, and 9.6 cases per 100,000 person-years in South America [13].

3. Vaccine Types, Coverage and Efficacy

The immune response provided by HPV vaccines is significantly more effective than that of the natural virus, underscoring the importance of prophylactic vaccination as a central strategy for disease prevention due to the critical role of host immunity in viral clearance. Currently, licensed HPV vaccines are formulated using virus-like particles (VLPs) which are non-infectious and non-oncogenic, providing a safer alternative to HPV-attenuated vaccines [14]. Three HPV vaccines—the nine-valent (Gardasil 9, 9vHPV), quadrivalent (Gardasil, 4vHPV), and bivalent (Cervarix, 2vHPV)—are available in many countries, targeting various HPV strains [15]. Firstly, Cervarix protects against HPV types 16 and 18, which are responsible for approximately 70% of CCs [16]. In addition, Gardasil targets these same HPV types and also addresses types 6 and 11, which account for 90% of genital wart cases [17]. Furthermore, Gardasil 9 provides extensive protection against HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 53, and 58, covering an additional 20% of CC cases and offering protection for nearly 90% of this type of cancer [18].
The real-world impact of HPV vaccination is substantial, with reported reductions of approximately 90% for HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18 infections, as well as significant reductions in genital warts and cervical abnormalities, yielding estimated vaccine efficacy ranging from 83% to 96.1% [19]. Additionally, vaccine effectiveness depends on multiple factors, including age at immunization, immunosuppressive status, geographical variations in HPV type distribution, and—critically—adherence to the vaccination schedule [20,21,22].

4. Vaccine Implementation in LATAM—Background, National Programs and Countries’ Target Populations

The WHO made an announcement endorsing the routine inclusion of HPV vaccination for females in national immunization programs in April 2009. This recommendation is based on key criteria: prioritizing CC and HPV-related diseases as public health concerns, ensuring programmatic feasibility for vaccine introduction, securing sustainable funding, and evaluating the cost-effectiveness of vaccination strategies for each country or region [23]. WHO asserts that “HPV vaccines should be introduced as part of a coordinated strategy to prevent CC” and warns that funding for these vaccines should not compromise resources for other effective CC screening programs [24].
In LATAM, the integration of HPV vaccination into immunization programs began in Panama and Mexico. In 2008, Panama incorporated a bivalent HPV vaccine into its national immunization program, targeting girls aged 10, and made it available through adolescent health services in clinics and schools. By 2009, one-dose coverage among 10-year-old girls reached 89%, while completion of the three-dose series was only 46% [25]. Similarly, in Mexico, the HPV vaccine was also introduced in 2008 across 125 municipalities with a low human development index, representing approximately 5% of the population and associated with the highest rates of CC. Quadrivalent HPV vaccine was provided through mobile health clinics to girls aged 12 to 16, adhering to a three-dose schedule. Mexico approved a nationwide expansion of its HPV vaccination program in 2011 to encompass school-based vaccination for all girls aged 9 years [26]. In Brazil, the HPV vaccine was introduced in 2014 for girls aged 9 to 14 and extended to boys in the same age group in 2017, as health center-based following a two-dose schedule [27].
Although most national immunization programs have traditionally focused on vaccinating girls, there is increasing recognition that extending vaccination to boys is essential to provide direct protection against HPV-related cancers in men and to enhance herd immunity [10]. Initial resistance to this policy was largely due to concerns about cost-effectiveness and the assumption that high coverage among girls would be sufficient. However, growing evidence of HPV-associated cancers in men and indirect benefits from herd protection have led many high- and middle-income countries to adopt gender-neutral vaccination strategies. In contrast, several LATAM countries—including Costa Rica, the Dominican Republic, Guyana, Honduras, Mexico, and Nicaragua—have yet to include boys in their HPV vaccination programs (Table 1).
Since its implementation, an interesting pattern has emerged in countries with available HPV vaccine data: adherence to the second dose is consistently lower than the first (Table 2) [28]. In response, WHO revised its recommendations to endorse a single-dose option for individuals aged 9–20, based on evidence demonstrating similar efficacy in preventing HPV infections and cervical precancerous lesions. Two doses are still recommended for those aged 21 years or older, and at least two, preferably three, doses are recommended for those who are immunocompromised [29]. This strategy aims to improve adherence and accessibility and has been implemented in some countries. In Brazil, the Ministry of Health changed the immunization regimen for girls and boys aged 9–14 years old from a two-dose to a single-dose scheme in 2024 [30].

5. Current Landscape of HPV Vaccination in Latin America

Mortality rates of CC are three times higher in LATAM and the Caribbean than in North America, highlighting severe health inequalities and the urgent need for interventions to reduce disease burden [1]. According to the WHO, among the 194 countries worldwide, 144 have included the HPV vaccine in their national immunization programs, while 48 have not. In America, only Venezuela, Haiti, and Cuba have not included the HPV vaccine in their national immunization programs [31]. In accordance with the usual recommendations for HPV vaccination (ages 9–14 for males and females; up to 45 years for immunosuppressed patients regardless of gender), an analysis was conducted on vaccination coverage across LATAM and within each of the 19 countries that comprise this region, considering the period between 2010 and 2023 (Table 1). The analysis showed that vaccination coverage has been increasing in both sexes; however, the uptake of the first vaccine dose has diminished in the years following its incorporation, which has been marked by significant variability in national immunization calendars, as well as a tendency in declining of adherence for the second dose across all countries with available vaccine data has been observed [28].
The HPV vaccination delivery strategy differs across countries. For instance, Brazil adopted a facility-based vaccination approach, while Bolivia, Peru, and Chile implemented a school-based vaccination approach. The coverage of the first dose of the HPV vaccine was reported by the WHO in 2023 and varies among LATAM countries (Table 2). Brazil, Peru, Chile, and Ecuador have coverage rates greater than 70%. On the other hand, Paraguay and Guyana have coverage rates of less than 45%. To date, no LATAM country has achieved the WHO target of 90% of girls fully vaccinated against HPV by age 15 [13].
Regarding CC screening in the Americas region, 78% of women aged 25–65 years have been screened at least once in their lifetime. In South America, this rate is 68%, also falling short of the target of 70% of women screened with a high-performance test by the age of 35. In Brazil, a country of continental dimensions, only 58% of women have ever undergone a screening test in their lifetime [32].
Regarding the impact of HPV vaccination on cervical cancer and high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in LATAM, most previous evidence in LMICs has relied on mathematical models. However, real-world data from Brazil demonstrated that the national HPV vaccination programme was associated with a 58% reduction in cervical cancer and a 67% reduction in CIN3 among women aged 20–24 years. These findings, consistent with results from high-income countries, confirm that HPV vaccination can significantly reduce disease burden even in resource-limited settings, although complete elimination will still require integration with robust screening programmes [33].

6. Barriers and Challenges

The lack of knowledge regarding the HPV vaccine remains a significant barrier to widespread immunization. A cross-sectional study conducted among Brazilian teenagers revealed that 45.54% of the participants were unaware of the HPV vaccine, with higher rates observed among those who had initiated sexual activity, attended public schools and resided in the Northeast Region [34]. These findings underscore the urgent need for expanded educational initiatives to raise awareness and encourage vaccination.
In Brazil, despite the implementation of a national HPV vaccination program in 2014, the coverage rate remains below the WHO target of 90%. This underscores the urgent need for targeted interventions to improve vaccine uptake. Additionally, there are regional disparities in vaccination coverage, with lower adherence in the North and Northeast regions, possibly due to limited healthcare infrastructure, lower socioeconomic status, and reduced access to vaccination services [28,34].
Another major challenge is the cultural stigmas associated with HPV vaccination. Since HPV is a sexually transmitted infection (STI), some parents fear that vaccinating their children may encourage early sexual initiation and increased sexual activity. Such misconceptions negatively affect parental acceptance and trust in the vaccine [35]. A study conducted among healthcare providers in Minnesota found that 79% of parents believed their child was not sexually active, and 63% assumed their child would not contract HPV-related diseases [36]. This highlights the powerful role of misinformation in parental decision-making, ultimately reducing vaccine uptake.
Conservative religious perspectives, combined with the characterization of HPV as a sexually transmitted infection, contribute to reinforcing cultural taboos that limit communication and education about HPV. Nevertheless, current evidence indicates that religiosity is not a consistent barrier to vaccination. Studies involving Catholic, Evangelical, Black, and Hispanic parents in the United States have shown no direct association between religious attendance or salience and HPV vaccine uptake, suggesting that factors such as perceived benefits, barriers, and physician recommendation exert greater influence on decision-making [37,38,39,40]. However, in more conservative environments, such as Christian universities, stronger religious beliefs regarding sexual abstinence have been associated with higher levels of hesitancy [39]. Importantly, weak or delayed physician recommendations appear to amplify parental doubts regardless of religious background, underscoring that healthcare communication, rather than religiosity itself, is the critical determinant of vaccine acceptance [40].
Furthermore, nonadherence to the HPV vaccination 3-dose regimen remains a critical challenge. In a California-based study involving 34,193 young women who initiated the quadrivalent HPV vaccine, the completion rate was 41.9% among those aged 9 to 17 years and 47.1% among those aged 18 to 26 years [41]. Additionally, a retrospective cohort study including 378,484 females aged 9 to 26 years in the United States reported that only 29.4% completed the full HPV vaccination series [42]. In Brazil, the completion rate is also suboptimal, particularly among boys. Contributing factors include vaccine hesitancy, logistical barriers, and lack of reinforcement from healthcare providers [43].
The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated the decline in HPV vaccination rates due to the disruption of routine immunization programs and a shift in healthcare priorities. A significant drop in HPV vaccine coverage was reported in multiple countries, where catch-up vaccination efforts are now crucial to recovering lost immunization rates and preventing future HPV-related diseases [44].
In addition, social media has emerged as a critical factor influencing HPV vaccine perceptions. While these platforms can improve awareness, they also amplify misinformation, particularly around safety and sexual behavior, which contributes to hesitancy [45]. Anti-vaccine content often receives higher engagement than supportive messages, further extending its reach and impact. Nonetheless, evaluations of targeted campaigns demonstrated that combining clear cancer-prevention messaging with empathetic language and peer-to-peer dialogue can effectively counter misinformation and promote engagement [46]. More recently, studies using large language models to analyze over 650,000 HPV-related tweets revealed that dominant concerns include adverse effects, personal anecdotes of vaccine injury, and debates on mandates and parental consent, emphasizing the evolving nature of online discourse and the need for dynamic monitoring to inform public health strategies [47].
Cost is another substantial barrier, particularly in LMICs, where the HPV vaccine is one of the most expensive childhood immunizations globally available. The cost exceeds $300 per full series. This financial barrier severely limits access for vulnerable populations and constrains national immunization program coverage [48].

7. Potential Solutions to Overcome Barriers and Future Perspectives

Enhancing knowledge and awareness is a proven strategy for increasing HPV vaccine adoption. Countries such as Australia, Mexico, and Peru have successfully surpassed the WHO-recommended 80% coverage rate by implementing targeted social marketing campaigns that effectively engaged their populations [49,50]. Additionally, the use of online environments and social media campaigns has proven effective in increasing vaccine awareness and engagement, particularly among younger populations who are more active on these platforms [51].
The role of healthcare providers is also crucial in addressing safety concerns and dispelling misconceptions surrounding HPV vaccination [52]. Additionally, school-based vaccination programs serve as vital safety-net institutions that significantly contribute to vaccination rates. A randomized trial conducted in 91 French municipalities demonstrated that in-school HPV vaccination increased coverage by 5.50 percentage points (95% CI, 3.13–7.88 percentage points) compared to conventional approaches [53].
Furthermore, simplifying the vaccination regimen could improve adherence and reduce costs. A randomized trial in India involving 17,729 women evaluated different dose schemes of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine and concluded that a single dose is immunogenic and provides long-lasting protection against HPV 16 and 18 infections, comparable to the three- and two-dose schedules [54]. Based on this evidence, the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization (SAGE) revised its guidelines to endorse a single-dose option for individuals aged 9–20 [29]. This approach facilitates broader vaccine coverage by addressing adherence issues, reducing financial burdens, and enabling more patients to receive the vaccine.
Additionally, policy interventions could play a critical role in increasing HPV vaccine uptake. Some countries, such as the United Kingdom and Australia, have implemented mandatory school-based vaccination programs, which have resulted in higher coverage rates and a significant decline in HPV-related diseases [55,56]. In LMICs, introducing financial incentives or expanding publicly funded vaccination could help overcome cost barriers and expand access to vulnerable populations [28]. A comprehensive overview of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to HPV vaccination in Latin America is exemplified in Figure 2, providing a structured framework to guide these policy decisions.
In this context, monitoring and evaluating the real-world impact of HPV vaccination is essential to guide and optimize prevention efforts. To address this need, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) launched in June 2025 the Center of Excellence for Monitoring HPV Vaccination Impact (CHRONOS), the first global repository of standardized data aimed at tracking outcomes, particularly in LMICs [9]. This initiative is especially relevant for regions such as LATAM, where the paucity of official data and the absence of robust registries and standardized systems continue to limit accurate evaluation of long-term impact and perpetuate gaps in CC prevention.
The combined use of high-coverage HPV vaccination and optimized cervical screening supports Australia’s strategy to fight cervical cancer. The National HPV Vaccination Program began in 2007 for girls and was extended to boys in 2013; approximately 80% of girls under 15 years achieved full coverage with the 4vHPV, with subsequent declines in HPV prevalence, high-grade cervical lesions and genital warts and documented herd effects [57]. Because cervical carcinogenesis has a long latency, older cohorts continue to rely primarily on screening. In 2017 the National Cervical Screening Program replaced two-year cytology with five-year primary HPV screening, increasing sensitivity and enabling earlier detection of prevalent lesions [58,59]. The planned rollout of the 9vHPV is expected to extend protection against additional oncogenic types and could prevent up to 90% of cervical cancers. Sustained high vaccination uptake combined with accessible, evidence-based screening provides an integrated, scalable framework for reducing cervical cancer burden [60].
Looking ahead, HPV vaccination in LATAM requires coordinated and innovative approaches to ensure sustained progress toward elimination goals. The PAHO Revolving Fund for Vaccine Procurement exemplifies how regional pooled purchasing mechanisms can successfully negotiate lower prices and ensure equitable access to HPV vaccines, providing a model that could be further expanded through frameworks such as MERCOSUR [61]. Public–private partnerships are also expected to become increasingly relevant, particularly for expanding access among vulnerable populations and ensuring the sustainability of national immunization programs. Collaborations with international organizations, philanthropic foundations, medical societies, advocacy groups—such as the Brazilian Gynecologic Tumor Group (EVA)—and the private sector could secure long-term financing, strengthen supply chains, and enhance accountability for expanding HPV vaccination [62]. Finally, advances in artificial intelligence and data science offer unique opportunities for real-time monitoring of HPV vaccination coverage and impact, with tools such as large language models enabling the detection of emerging misinformation and supporting evidence-based interventions tailored to population needs [46].
By implementing these strategies—education, healthcare provider advocacy, school-based programs, digital engagement, policy interventions, and simplified dosing regimens—it is possible to overcome barriers and significantly increase HPV vaccination coverage, ultimately contributing to the reduction of HPV-related diseases and CC incidence globally.

8. Conclusions

Despite being a crucial advancement in public health, HPV vaccination in LATAM faces significant challenges that limit its effectiveness. Although most countries have included the vaccine in their national immunization programs, coverage targets are largely unmet, particularly in regions where the vaccine is not yet widely available. Barriers such as limited public awareness, cultural stigma, safety concerns, logistical difficulties, and poor integration with healthcare services contribute to persistently low adherence—especially regarding completion of multidose regimens. To improve HPV vaccination efforts, strategies must be tailored to local contexts. Promising approaches include engaging healthcare providers, integrating vaccination into schools, and adopting a single-dose schedule. These approaches, along with increased vaccine access, enhanced public awareness, and consistent program monitoring, are essential for achieving higher coverage and advancing CC elimination in LATAM.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.d.M.; methodology, A.C.d.M.; software, not applicable; validation, A.C.d.M.; formal analysis, A.C.d.M.; investigation, M.B.d.S., M.P.A., G.V.G., L.M.G., J.L.d.S. and D.A.P.d.A.; resources, not applicable; data curation, M.B.d.S., M.P.A., G.V.G., L.M.G., J.L.d.S. and D.A.P.d.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B.d.S., M.P.A., G.V.G., L.M.G. and D.A.P.d.A.; writing—review and editing, M.B.d.S., M.P.A., G.V.G., L.M.G., D.A.P.d.A., A.C.d.M. and J.L.d.S.; visualization, M.B.d.S.; supervision, A.C.d.M.; project administration, M.B.d.S.; funding acquisition, not applicable. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that this study has received no financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Marcela Bonalumi dos Santos, Giovanna Vieira Giannecchini, Larissa Müller Gomes, Jessé Lopes da Silva, Diocesio Alves Pinto de Andrade and Andréia Cristina de Melo were employed by the company Oncoclinicas&Co. The authors state that the research was carried out without any commercial or financial relationships that could be seen as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 229–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Crosbie, E.J.; Einstein, M.H.; Franceschi, S.; Kitchener, H.C. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 2013, 382, 889–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wei, F.; Georges, D.; Man, I.; Baussano, I.; Clifford, G.M. Causal attribution of human papillomavirus genotypes to invasive cervical cancer worldwide: A systematic analysis of the global literature. Lancet 2024, 404, 435–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Paavonen, J.; Naud, P.; Salmerón, J.; Wheeler, C.M.; Chow, S.-N.; Apter, D.; Kitchener, H.; Castellsague, X.; Teixeira, J.C.; Skinner, S.R.; et al. Efficacy of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine against cervical infection and precancer caused by oncogenic HPV types (PATRICIA): Final analysis of a double-blind, randomised study in young women. Lancet 2009, 374, 301–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Future II Study Group. Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 356, 1915–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Huh, W.K.; Joura, E.A.; Giuliano, A.R.; Iversen, O.-E.; De Andrade, R.P.; Ault, K.A.; Bartholomew, D.; Cestero, R.M.; Fedrizzi, E.N.; Hirschberg, A.L.; et al. Final efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety analyses of a nine-valent human papillomavirus vaccine in women aged 16–26 years: A randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet 2017, 390, 2143–2159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Saraiya, M.; Unger, E.R.; Thompson, T.D.; Lynch, C.F.; Hernandez, B.Y.; Lyu, C.W.; Steinau, M.; Watson, M.; Wilkinson, E.J.; Hopenhayn, C.; et al. US Assessment of HPV Types in Cancers: Implications for Current and 9-Valent HPV Vaccines. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2015, 107, djv086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gultekin, M.; Ramirez, P.T.; Broutet, N.; Hutubessy, R. World Health Organization call for action to eliminate cervical cancer globally. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2020, 30, 426–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. IARC Launches Website for the Center of Excellence for Monitoring HPV Vaccination Impact (CHRONOS). Available online: https://www.iarc.who.int/news-events/iarc-launches-website-for-the-center-of-excellence-for-monitoring-hpv-vaccination-impact-chronos (accessed on 31 August 2025).
  10. Drolet, M.; Bénard, É.; Pérez, N.; Brisson, M. Population-level impact and herd effects following the introduction of human papillomavirus vaccination programmes: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2019, 394, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. De Martel, C.; Plummer, M.; Vignat, J.; Franceschi, S. Worldwide burden of cancer attributable to HPV by site, country and HPV type. Int. J. Cancer 2017, 141, 664–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Rositch, A.F. Global burden of cancer attributable to infections: The critical role of implementation science. Lancet Glob. Health 2020, 8, e153–e154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. World Health Organization. Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination Coverage. Available online: https://immunizationdata.who.int/global/wiise-detail-page/human-papillomavirus-(hpv)-vaccination-coverage (accessed on 16 February 2025).
  14. Kirnbauer, R.; Booy, F.; Cheng, N.; Lowy, D.R.; Schiller, J.T. Papillomavirus L1 major capsid protein self-assembles into virus-like particles that are highly immunogenic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1992, 89, 12180–12184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wu, H.; Li, L.; Fu, K.; Shen, Y.; Lu, Y.; Liao, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zha, W.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Y. Effects of different-valent vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) to prevent persistent HPV16/18 infections and CIN2+ in women: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2024, 151, 107363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Paavonen, J.; Jenkins, D.; Bosch, F.X.; Naud, P.; Salmerón, J.; Wheeler, C.M.; Chow, S.-N.; Apter, D.L.; Kitchener, H.C.; Castellsague, X.; et al. Efficacy of a prophylactic adjuvanted bivalent L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: An interim analysis of a phase III double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2007, 369, 2161–2170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Garland, S.M.; Steben, M.; Sings, H.L.; James, M.; Lu, S.; Railkar, R.; Barr, E.; Haupt, R.M.; Joura, E.A. Natural history of genital warts: Analysis of the placebo arm of 2 randomized phase III trials of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) vaccine. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 199, 805–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moreira, E.D.; Block, S.L.; Ferris, D.; Giuliano, A.R.; Iversen, O.-E.; Joura, E.A.; Kosalaraksa, P.; Schilling, A.; Van Damme, P.; Bornstein, J.; et al. Safety Profile of the 9-Valent HPV Vaccine: A Combined Analysis of 7 Phase III Clinical Trials. Pediatrics 2016, 138, e20154387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garland, S.M.; Kjaer, S.K.; Muñoz, N.; Block, S.L.; Brown, D.R.; DiNubile, M.J.; Lindsay, B.R.; Kuter, B.J.; Perez, G.; Dominiak-Felden, G.; et al. Impact and Effectiveness of the Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: A Systematic Review of 10 Years of Real-world Experience. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2016, 63, 519–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Markowitz, L.E.; Hariri, S.; Lin, C.; Dunne, E.F.; Steinau, M.; McQuillan, G.; Unger, E.R. Reduction in human papilloma-virus (HPV) prevalence among young women following HPV vaccine introduction in the United States, Nation-al Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 385–393. [Google Scholar]
  21. Garland, S.; Brotherton, J.; Moscicki, A.; Kaufmann, A.; Stanley, M.; Bhatla, N.; Sankaranarayanan, R.; de Sanjosé, S.; Palefsky, J. HPV vaccination of immunocompromised hosts. Papillomavirus Res. 2017, 4, 35–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhai, L.; Tumban, E. Gardasil-9: A global survey of projected efficacy. Antivir. Res. 2016, 130, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. World Health Organization. Human Papillomavirus Vaccines: WHO Position Paper. March 2023. Available online: https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/immunization/position_paper_documents/human-papillomavirus-(hpv)/hpv-background-document--report-march-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=b600e252_1 (accessed on 18 February 2025).
  24. Nogueira-Rodrigues, A. HPV Vaccination in Latin America: Global Challenges and Feasible Solutions. Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol. Educ. Book 2019, 39, e45–e52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Robles, C.; Hernández, M.d.l.L.; Almonte, M. Alternative HPV vaccination schedules in Latin America. Salud Publica De Mex. 2018, 60, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Romero-Feregrino, R.; Romero-Cabello, R.; Romero-Feregrino, R.; Vilchis-Mora, P.; Muñoz-Cordero, B.; Rodríguez-León, M.A. Sixteen Years of HPV Vaccination in Mexico: Report of the Coverage, Procurement, and Program Performance (2008–2023). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Soares, L.M.C.; de Medonça, A.E.O.; de Souza, D.L.B.; Carvalho, A.V.; Flores, M.G.; Neto, A.M.; de Andrade, D.A.P.; Rodrigues, A.N. Factors associated with HPV vaccine hesitancy: A nationally representative cross-sectional study. Vaccine 2025, 59, 127278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nogueira-Rodrigues, A.; Flores, M.G.; Neto, A.O.M.; Braga, L.A.C.; Vieira, C.M.; de Sousa-Lima, R.M.; de Andrade, D.A.P.; Machado, K.K.; Guimarães, A.P.G. HPV vaccination in Latin America: Coverage status, implementation challenges and strategies to overcome it. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 984449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stanley, M.; Schuind, A.; Muralidharan, K.K.; Guillaume, D.; Willens, V.; Borda, H.; Jurgensmeyer, M.; Limaye, R. Evidence for an HPV one-dose schedule. Vaccine 2024, 42, S16–S21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roteli-Martins, C.M.; Maranhão, A.G.K.; Fialho, S.C.A.V.; da Silva-Filho, A.L. The importance of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine in the elimination of cervical cancer in Brazil. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstetrícia 2024, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Han, J.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.; Cai, R.; Li, M.; Dai, Y.; Dang, L.; Chen, H.; et al. Global HPV vaccination programs and coverage rates: A systematic review. eClinicalMedicine 2025, 84, 103290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  32. Fernández-Deaza, G.; Serrano, B.; Roura, E.; Castillo, J.S.; Caicedo-Martínez, M.; Bruni, L.; Murillo, R. Cervical cancer screening coverage in the Americas region: A synthetic analysis. Lancet Reg. Health Am. 2024, 30, 100689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cerqueira-Silva, T.; Barral-Netto, M.; Boaventura, V.S. Effect of Brazil’s national human papillomavirus vaccination programme on the incidence of cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 in women aged 20–24 years: A population-based study. Lancet Glob. Health 2025, 13, e1715–e1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Da Silva, T.M.R.; da Sá, A.C.M.G.; Carrato, B.A.; Siqueira Costa Schreck, R.; Prates, E.J.S.; Oliveira, S.R.D.; Malta, D.C. Lack of knowledge about the human papillomavirus vaccine among Brazilian adolescents: A cross-sectional study. Public Health Nurs. 2024, 41, 1453–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lobão, W.M.; Duarte, F.G.; Burns, J.D.; Santos, C.A.D.S.T.; De Almeida, M.C.C.; Reingold, A.; Moreira, E.D. Low coverage of HPV vaccination in the national immunization programme in Brazil: Parental vaccine refusal or barriers in health-service based vaccine delivery? PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. McRee, A.-L.; Gilkey, M.B.; Dempsey, A.F. HPV vaccine hesitancy: Findings from a statewide survey of health care providers. J. Pediatr. Health Care 2014, 28, 541–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Coleman, D.C.; Markham, C.; Guilamo-Ramos, V.; Maria, D.S. Relationship between religiosity and HPV vaccine initiation and intention in urban black and hispanic parents. BMC Public Health 2024, 24, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Gilkey, M.B.; Malo, T.L.; Shah, P.D.; Hall, M.E.; Brewer, N.T. Quality of Physician Communication about Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Findings from a National Survey. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2015, 24, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. de Carvalho, N.S.; da Silva, R.J.d.C.; do Val, I.C.; Bazzo, M.L.; da Silveira, M.F. Protocolo Brasileiro para Infecções Sexualmente Transmissíveis 2020: Infecção pelo papilomavírus humano (HPV). Epidemiol Serv Saúde 2021, 30, e2020790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wagner, A.; Juvalta, S.; Speranza, C.; Suggs, L.S.; Drava, J.; COVIDisc Study Group. Let’s talk about COVID-19 vaccination: Relevance of conversations about COVID-19 vaccination and information sources on vaccination intention in Switzerland. Vaccine 2023, 41, 5313–5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Chao, C.; Velicer, C.; Slezak, J.M.; Jacobsen, S.J. Correlates for completion of 3-dose regimen of HPV vaccine in female members of a managed care organization. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009, 84, 864–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, G.; Kong, L.; Du, P. HPV vaccine completion and dose adherence among commercially insured females aged 9 through 26 years in the US. Papillomavirus Res. 2015, 2, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Santos, W.M.; Santos, D.M.; Fernandes, M.S. HPV immunization in Brazil and proposals to increase adherence to vaccination campaigns. Rev. Saude Publica 2023, 57, 79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Puri, N.; Coomes, E.A.; Haghbayan, H.; Gunaratne, K. Social media and vaccine hesitancy: New updates for the era of COVID-19 and globalized infectious diseases. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 2020, 16, 2586–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Reimold, A.E.; D’ANgelo, H.; Rose, S.W.; Ribisl, K.M. Changes in retail tobacco product sales and market share among retail payroll establishments in the U.S. Economic Census between 1997 and 2017. Prev. Med. Rep. 2023, 35, 102294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. de Moura, I.A.; Silva, A.J.D.; de Macêdo, L.S.; Melo, K.M.T.B.d.; Leal, L.R.S.; Espinoza, B.C.F.; Invenção, M.d.C.V.; Pinho, S.S.d.; Freitas, A.C.d. Advances in the Functionalization of Vaccine Delivery Systems: Innovative Strategies and Translational Perspectives. Pharmaceutics 2025, 17, 640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Rai, S.; Kornides, M.; Morgan, J.; Kumar, A.; Cappella, J.; Guntuku, S.C. Detecting and monitoring concerns against HPV vaccination on social media using large language models. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 14362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wight, A.J. Latin America is catching up on HPV vaccination and screening. BMJ 2024, 386, q1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bahena, M.; Carvajal-Suarez, M.; Soliman, A.S.; Luo, J.; De Alba, A. The influence of medical providers on HPV vaccination among children of Mexican mothers: A comparison between Mexico and the Midwest region of the United States. BMC Public Health 2019, 19, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Clavé Llavall, A.; de Wildt, G.; Meza, G.; Tattsbridge, J.; Jones, L. Nurses’ and teachers’ perceived barriers and facilitators to the uptake of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) vaccination program in Iquitos, Peru: A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0255218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Leader, A.E.; Burke-Garcia, A.; Afanaseva, D.; Cutroneo, E.; Selvan, P.; Madden, K.; Banks, J.; Sustaita-Ruiz, A. Partnering with social media influencers to promote HPV vaccination in diverse communities. Vaccine 2025, 53, 127085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Taumberger, N.A.; Joura, E.; Arbyn, M.; Kyrgiou, M.; Sehouli, J.; Gultekin, M. Myths and fake messages about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination: Answers from the ESGO Prevention Committee. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2022, 32, 1316–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thilly, N.; Michel, M.; Simon, M.; Bocquier, A.; Gagneux-Brunon, A.; Gauchet, A.; Gilberg, S.; Le Duc-Banaszuk, A.-S.; Bruel, S.; Mueller, J.E.; et al. Effectiveness of a School- and Primary Care–Based HPV Vaccination Intervention. JAMA Netw. Open 2024, 7, e2411938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sankaranarayanan, R.; Joshi, S.; Muwonge, R.; Esmy, P.O.; Basu, P.; Prabhu, P.; Bhatla, N.; Nene, B.M.; Shaw, J.; Poli, U.R.R.; et al. Can a single dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine prevent cervical cancer? Early findings from an Indian study. Vaccine 2018, 36, 4783–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Rockliffe, L.; McBride, E.; Heffernan, C.; Forster, A.S. Factors Affecting Delivery of the HPV Vaccination: A Focus Group Study With NHS School-Aged Vaccination Teams in London. J. Sch. Nurs. 2018, 36, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vujovich-Dunn, C.; Wand, H.; Brotherton, J.M.L.; Gidding, H.; Sisnowski, J.; Lorch, R.; Veitch, M.; Sheppeard, V.; Effler, P.; Skinner, S.R.; et al. Measuring school level attributable risk to support school-based HPV vaccination programs. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hall, M.T.; Simms, K.T.; Lew, J.-B.; Smith, M.A.; Saville, M.; Canfell, K. Projected future impact of HPV vaccination and primary HPV screening on cervical cancer rates from 2017–2035: Example from Australia. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0185332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Brotherton, J.M.; Gertig, D.M.; May, C.; Chappell, G.; Saville, M. HPV vaccine impact in Australian women: Ready for an HPV-based screening program. Med. J. Aust. 2016, 204, 184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lew, J.-B.; Simms, K.T.; Smith, M.A.; Hall, M.; Kang, Y.-J.; Xu, X.M.; Caruana, M.; Velentzis, L.S.; Bessell, T.; Saville, M.; et al. Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: Effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program. Lancet Public Health 2017, 2, e96–e107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Australia on Track to Achieve Cervical Cancer Elimination by 2035—But There is Work to Done—ACPCC. 2025. Available online: https://acpcc.org.au/australia-on-track-to-achieve-cervical-cancer-elimination-by-2035-but-there-is-work-to-done/ (accessed on 18 September 2025).
  61. Luciani, S.; Bruni, L.; Agurto, I.; Ruiz-Matus, C. HPV vaccine implementation and monitoring in Latin America. Salud Publica Mex. 2018, 60, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Gallagher, K.; LaMontagne, D.; Watson-Jones, D. Status of HPV vaccine introduction and barriers to country uptake. Vaccine 2018, 36, 4761–4767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Healthcare 13 02502 g001
Figure 1. Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate (per 100,000 women-years) [1].
Figure 1. Cervical Cancer Incidence Rate (per 100,000 women-years) [1].
Healthcare 13 02502 g001
Healthcare 13 02502 g002
Figure 2. SWOT analysis of HPV vaccination in Latin America.
Figure 2. SWOT analysis of HPV vaccination in Latin America.
Healthcare 13 02502 g002
Table 1. Vaccination Data in LATAM According to WHO.
Table 1. Vaccination Data in LATAM According to WHO.
CountryYear of HPV Vaccine ImplementationTarget SexSchedule (9–14 Years Old)HPV Vaccination Program Coverage, First Dose, Females (2023)HPV Vaccination Program Coverage, Last Dose, Females (2023)HPV Vaccine Primary Delivery Strategy
Argentina2011F/M163%36%MX
Bolivia2017F167%67%SB
Brazil2014F/M187%73%FB
Chile2014F/M288%83%SB
Colombia2012F/M152%52%SB
Costa Rica2019F277%66%SB
Dominican Republic2017F166%66%FB
Ecuador2014F/M279%50%SB
El Salvador2020F/M176%36%SB
Guatemala2018F/M148%48%SB
Guyana2011F/M140%40%SB
Honduras2016F181%61%SB
Mexico2012F162%62%SB
Nicaragua2023F278%N/ASB
Panama2008F/M279%66%MB
Paraguay2013F/M144%22%MB
Peru2015F/M174%74%SB
Suriname2013F/M1N/AN/ASB
Uruguay2013F/M267%41%FB
F = Female M = Male NA = Not available SB = School-based FB = Facility-based MX = mixed. Data gathered from World Health Organization report’s—Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage [13].
Table 2. Vaccination coverage in immunization programs in Latin America between 2010 and 2023 (%).
Table 2. Vaccination coverage in immunization programs in Latin America between 2010 and 2023 (%).
20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010
First dose—females6869535760666962606438321711
First dose—males433939383938271514119530
Last dose—females555439395453585143442924106
Last dose—males332928262628139743210
Data gathered from World Health Organization report’s—Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination coverage [13].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bonalumi dos Santos, M.; Parenza Arenhardt, M.; Vieira Giannecchini, G.; Müller Gomes, L.; Lopes da Silva, J.; Alves Pinto de Andrade, D.; de Melo, A.C. Advancements and Future Perspectives of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination in Latin America: Insights from Recent Decades. Healthcare 2025, 13, 2502. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192502

AMA Style

Bonalumi dos Santos M, Parenza Arenhardt M, Vieira Giannecchini G, Müller Gomes L, Lopes da Silva J, Alves Pinto de Andrade D, de Melo AC. Advancements and Future Perspectives of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination in Latin America: Insights from Recent Decades. Healthcare. 2025; 13(19):2502. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192502

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bonalumi dos Santos, Marcela, Martina Parenza Arenhardt, Giovanna Vieira Giannecchini, Larissa Müller Gomes, Jessé Lopes da Silva, Diocesio Alves Pinto de Andrade, and Andréia Cristina de Melo. 2025. "Advancements and Future Perspectives of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination in Latin America: Insights from Recent Decades" Healthcare 13, no. 19: 2502. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192502

APA Style

Bonalumi dos Santos, M., Parenza Arenhardt, M., Vieira Giannecchini, G., Müller Gomes, L., Lopes da Silva, J., Alves Pinto de Andrade, D., & de Melo, A. C. (2025). Advancements and Future Perspectives of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccination in Latin America: Insights from Recent Decades. Healthcare, 13(19), 2502. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13192502

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop