The Multi-Level Influencing Factors of Internet Use Among the Elderly Population and Its Association with Mental Health Promotion: Empirical Research Based on Mixed Cross-Sectional Data
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Research Hypotheses
2.1. Influencing Factors and Research Hypotheses of Internet Usage Among the Elderly Population
2.2. The Impact of Internet Usage on the Mental Health of the Elderly Group and Research Hypotheses
3. Data, Variables, and Methods
3.1. Data Sources
3.2. Variable Processing
3.3. Research Methods
4. Sample Description and Empirical Findings
4.1. Sample Analysis
4.2. Empirical Results
4.2.1. Analysis of Influencing Factors for the Use of the Elderly Group
4.2.2. Analysis of the Impact of Internet Use on the Mental Health of the Elderly Group
4.3. Robustness Test
5. Conclusions
6. Discussion
6.1. Academic Contributions and Theoretical Significance
- (1)
- Integration of multi-level perspectives. Traditional studies mostly focus on a single level (such as individuals or families), while this study reveals the interaction among individuals, families, and social factors through a hierarchical model; verifies the view that regional Internet infrastructure needs to be coordinated with micro-mechanisms; and provides a new analytical framework for the study of the digital divide.
- (2)
- Regarding the exploration of mechanisms underlying the association with mental health, unlike the “presence substitution effect” proposed in existing studies, this research found a robust association between internet use and better mental health status among older adults. This finding provides a theoretical reference for mental health intervention practices targeting the elderly.
6.2. Practical Insights and Policy Suggestions
- (1)
- Individual ability enhancement: Establishing a full life-cycle education system.
- (2)
- Intergenerational support within families: Promote the digital mutual assistance model.
- (3)
- Social adaptation for the elderly: Optimizing policy synergy.
6.3. Research Limitations and Future Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- National Bureau of Statistics. Statistical Bulletin on National Economic and Social Development of the People’s Republic of China 2024. Beijing. Available online: https://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202502/t20250228_1958817.html (accessed on 17 April 2025).
- China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). 55th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China. Beijing. Available online: https://www.100ec.cn/Public/Upload/file/20250120/1737335916881378.pdf (accessed on 17 April 2025).
- Wesley Fryer. Digital Refugees and Bridges [EB|OL]. (2006-10). Available online: https://www.infinitethinking.org/2006/10/digital-refugees-and-bridges.html/ (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Wang, T. Social Change and Social Research in the Digital Age. Chin. Soc. Sci. 2021, 12, 73–88+200–201. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, S.; Qiu, Y. The Formation and Bridging of the “Silver Digital Divide”—Based on a Review of Literature and Theoretical Insights from 2001 to 2019. News Spring Autumn 2021, 1, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, J.; Jang, S. Have changes in internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic affected older adults’ self-rated health? A cross-sectional study of young-old and old-old populations in Korea. Geriatr. Nurs. 2022, 48, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, P.; Han, W. Internet and Elderly Life: Challenges and Opportunities. Popul. Res. 2021, 45, 3–16. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, S. Suicide among the Elderly in China’s Mainland. Psychogeriatr. Off. J. Jpn. Psychogeriatr. Soc. 2010, 9, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The State Council Issued a Notice on the 14th Five-Year Plan for the Development of National Aging Cause and the Elderly Care Service System [EB|OL]. (2022-02-21). Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2022-02/21/content_5674844.htm (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology Has Deployed a Special Campaign to Further Improve the Age-Appropriate and Barrier-Free Transformation of Internet Applications [EB|OL]. (2021-04-06). Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2021-04/13/content_5599225.htm (accessed on 15 May 2025).
- Berner, J.S.; Rennemark, M.; Jogréus, C.; Berglund, J. Factors Associated with Change in Internet Usage of Swedish Older Adults. Health Inform. J. 2013, 19, 152–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, Q.; Xu, Y. Analysis of Factors Influencing the Willingness of the Elderly to Participate in “Internet + Chronic Disease Management”—An Empirical Study Based on the Anderson Health Behavior Model. Health Econ. Res. 2020, 37, 45–48. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, R.; Hu, J.; Du, C.; Cheng, N. Data mining of Internet use behavior patterns of the elderly. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2014, 14, 236–241. [Google Scholar]
- Charness, N. The New Media and Older Adults: Usable and Useful? Am. Behav. Sci. 2004, 48, 416–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, C.; Campbell, A.; Hughes, I. Research: Ageing, social capital and the internet: Findings from an exploratory study of Australian “silver surfers”. Australas. J. Ageing 2008, 27, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Opalinski, L. Older adults and the digital divide: Assessing results of a web-based survey. J. Technol. Hum. Serv. 2001, 18, 203–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S. Research on the influencing factors of computer/internet use among elderly people in Chinese cities: A survey based on Chaoyang District, Beijing. Int. J. Journal. 2013, 35, 51–61. [Google Scholar]
- Eszter, H.; Anne, M.P.; Meredith, R.M. From internet access to internet skills: Digital inequality among older adults. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 2019, 18, 881–890. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B. Research on the Influencing Factors of Internet Use among Chinese Elderly People from a Multidimensional Perspective. Popul. Dev. 2020, 26, 98–106. [Google Scholar]
- Norris, P. Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, S.; Zhou, S.; Jiang, T. Research on the Influencing Factors of Internet Use by the Elderly in the Digital Age. Lanzhou Acad. J. 2022, 5, 141–149. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C.; Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, X. Does internet use promote mental health among middle-aged and older adults in China? Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 999498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pénard, T.; Poussing, N. Internet use and social capital: The strength of virtual ties. J. Econ. Nomic Issues 2010, 44, 569–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.C.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.Y. Internet Use, Cultural Engagement, and Multi-Dimensional Health of Older Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study in China. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 887840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lyu, S.; Sun, J. Internet use and self-rated health among Chinese older adults: The mediating role of social capital. Geriatr. Gerontol. Int. 2021, 21, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Zhang, Q. The relationship between Internet use and mental health of the elderly: Analysis of the differences between urban and rural. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0280318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, A.M.; Iris, M. Health Promotion Attitudes and Strategies in Older Adults. Health Educ. Behav. 2002, 29, 249–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, N.H. Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. Am. Behav. Sci. 2001, 45, 420–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, L.; Yang, H.L.; Lin, X.Y.; Ti, S.M.; Wu, Y.Y.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, S.Q.; Zhou, W.L. Does the Internet Use Improve the Mental Health of Chinese Older Adults? Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 673368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L. Research on the Mechanism of Internet Use Affecting the Physical and Mental Health of the Elderly: An Empirical Analysis Based on CGSS (2013) Data. Mod. Econ. Res. 2018, 4, 101–108. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, Z. Digital Segregation in Chinese Society. 2001. Available online: http://www.shehui.pku.edu.cn/upload/editor/file/20180928/20180928153000_4002.pdf (accessed on 2 May 2025).
- Zhao, L. Generational Differences in Online Public Participation Among the Post-70s, Post-80s, and Post-90s—An Exploration of Public Participation on WeChat and Weibo. Fujian Forum (Humanit. Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2019, 4, 151–160. [Google Scholar]
- Helena, B.V.; Samo, B.; Peter, K.; Marija, J.K. Attitudes of active older Internet users towards online social networking. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2016, 55, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Zeng, X. New Human Capital Theory—Research Dynamics of Human Capital Theory Basedon Ability. Econ. Dyn. 2012, 11, 120–126. [Google Scholar]
- Freese, J.; Rivas, S.; Hargittai, E. Cognitive Ability and Internet Use among Older Adults. Poetics 2006, 34, 236–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, Q. Factors influencing Internet access barriers for elderly people in cities. Popul. Econ. 2018, 5, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
- Hartanto, A.; Yong, J.C.; Toh, W.X.; Lee, S.T.; Tng, G.Y.; Tov, W. Cognitive, social, emo-tional, and subjective health benefits of computer use in adults: A 9-year longitudinal study from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS). Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 104, 106179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable Name | Assignment Description |
---|---|
Internet use | Yes = 1; No = 0 |
Mental health | Always = 4, often = 3, sometimes = 2, rarely = 1, and never = 0 |
Age | Actual age |
Gender | 0 = female, 1 = male |
Educational attainment | Having received no education = 0, private school or literacy class = 1, primary school = 2, junior high school = 3, vocational/general high schools, technical secondary schools, and technical schools = 4, and college, junior college, and above = 5 |
Logarithm of personal income | Take the logarithm of the individual’s total annual income in 2020 |
Physical health condition | Very unhealthy, relatively unhealthy = 0, average, relatively healthy, very healthy = 1 |
Marriage | Others = 0, married with a spouse = 1 |
The number of children | The total number of sons/daughters (including adopted sons/adopted daughters) |
The situation of family members’ Internet access | Not going online = 0, going online = 1 |
Logarithm of total household income | Take the logarithm of the total household income for the whole year of 2020 |
Internet penetration rate | Internet penetration data by province |
Variable Name | Mean | SD | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 70.028 | 6.813 | 60 | 99 |
Gender | 0.508 | 0.500 | 0 | 1 |
Educational attainment | 2.330 | 1.442 | 0 | 5 |
Logarithm of personal income | 8.112 | 3.639 | 0 | 16.117 |
Physical health condition | 0.701 | 0.458 | 0 | 1 |
Marriage | 0.733 | 0.442 | 0 | 1 |
The number of children | 2.254 | 1.270 | 0 | 13 |
The situation of family members’ Internet access | 0.652 | 0.477 | 0 | 1 |
Logarithm of total household income | 9.618 | 2.945 | 0 | 16.118 |
Internet penetration rate | 0.729 | 0.081 | 0.574 | 0.919 |
Variable Name | Not Using the Internet | Use of the Internet | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | Mean | SD | N | Mean | SD | |
Mental health | 1288 | 1.273 | 1.192 | 911 | 0.908 | 1.070 |
Age | 1288 | 71.589 | 6.912 | 911 | 67.774 | 5.965 |
Gender | 1288 | 0.512 | 0.500 | 911 | 0.503 | 0.500 |
Educational attainment | 1280 | 1.849 | 1.352 | 906 | 3.011 | 1.288 |
Logarithm of personal income | 1288 | 7.459 | 3.751 | 944 | 9.050 | 3.250 |
Physical health condition | 1286 | 0.631 | 0.483 | 911 | 0.800 | 0.400 |
Marriage | 1288 | 0.699 | 0.459 | 911 | 0.783 | 0.413 |
The number of children | 1288 | 2.516 | 1.341 | 911 | 1.877 | 1.052 |
The situation of family members’ Internet access | 1225 | 0.497 | 0.500 | 887 | 0.868 | 0.339 |
Logarithm of total household income | 1288 | 9.095 | 3.103 | 911 | 10.381 | 2.492 |
Internet penetration rate | 1288 | 0.719 | 0.079 | 911 | 0.744 | 0.082 |
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | −0.085 *** | −0.068 *** | −0.068 *** | ||
(0.008) | (0.010) | (0.010) | |||
Gender | −0.488 *** | −0.433 *** | −0.427 *** | ||
(0.108) | (0.117) | (0.117) | |||
Educational attainment | 0.554 *** | 0.503 *** | 0.502 *** | ||
(0.045) | (0.047) | (0.047) | |||
Logarithm of personal income | 0.051 *** | 0.038 * | 0.037 * | ||
(0.016) | (0.020) | (0.020) | |||
Physical health condition | 0.508 *** | 0.447 *** | 0.443 *** | ||
(0.117) | (0.125) | (0.125) | |||
Marriage | 0.211 | 0.206 | |||
(0.132) | (0.132) | ||||
The number of children | −0.069 | −0.064 | |||
(0.054) | (0.054) | ||||
The situation of family members’ Internet access | 1.608 *** | 1.608 *** | |||
(0.129) | (0.129) | ||||
Logarithm of total household income | 0.008 | 0.008 | |||
(0.026) | (0.026) | ||||
Internet penetration rate | 2.944 ** | 1.374 | |||
(1.600) | (1.326) | ||||
The intercept term | −0.441 *** | −2.541 ** | 3.666 *** | 1.535 ** | 0.574 |
(0.143) | (1.148) | (0.607) | (0.707) | (1.128) | |
Inter-provincial intercept variance | 0.364 *** | 0.305 *** | 0.215 *** | 0.180 *** | 0.164 *** |
(0.129) | (0.028) | (0.087) | (0.080) | (0.076) |
Variable Name | (1) | (2) | (3) |
---|---|---|---|
Odds Ratio | Odds Ratio | Odds Ratio | |
Age | 0.92 *** | 0.93 *** | 0.93 *** |
[0.90,0.93] | [0.92,0.95] | [0.92,0.95] | |
Gender | 0.61 *** | 0.65 *** | 0.65 *** |
[0.50,0.76] | [0.52,0.82] | [0.52,0.82] | |
Educational attainment | 1.74 *** | 1.65 *** | 1.65 *** |
[1.59,1.90] | [1.51,1.81] | [1.51,1.81] | |
Logarithm of personal income | 1.05 ** | 1.04 | 1.04 |
[1.02,1.09] | [1.00,1.08] | [1.00,1.08] | |
Physical health condition | 1.66 *** | 1.56 *** | 1.56 *** |
[1.32,2.09] | [1.22,2.00] | [1.22,1.99] | |
Marriage | 1.23 | 1.23 | |
[0.95,1.60] | [0.95,1.59] | ||
The number of children | 0.93 | 0.94 | |
[0.84,1.04] | [0.84,1.04] | ||
The situation of family members’ Internet access | 4.99 *** | 4.99 *** | |
[3.88,6.43] | [3.88,6.43] | ||
Logarithm of total household income | 1.01 | 1.01 | |
[0.96,1.06] | [0.96,1.06] | ||
Internet penetration rate | 3.95 | ||
[0.29,53.12] | |||
var(_cons) | 1.24 * | 1.20 * | 1.18 * |
[1.05,1.47] | [1.02,1.40] | [1.02,1.37] |
Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mental Health | Mental Health | Mental Health | Mental Health | |
Internet use | −0.365 *** | −0.128 ** | −0.108 ** | −0.099 * |
(0.049) | (0.051) | (0.054) | (0.054) | |
Age | −0.005 | −0.009 ** | −0.008 ** | |
(0.003) | (0.004) | (0.003) | ||
Gender | −0.236 *** | −0.248 *** | −0.267 *** | |
(0.046) | (0.047) | (0.048) | ||
Educational attainment | −0.072 *** | −0.072 *** | −0.067 *** | |
(0.018) | (0.019) | (0.019) | ||
Logarithm of personal income | −0.019 *** | −0.007 | −0.005 | |
(0.007) | (0.008) | (0.008) | ||
Physical health condition | −0.874 *** | −0.847 *** | −0.837 *** | |
(0.050) | (0.051) | (0.051) | ||
Marriage | −0.129 ** | −0.121 ** | ||
(0.054) | (0.054) | |||
The number of children | 0.030 | 0.020 | ||
(0.020) | (0.020) | |||
The situation of family members’ Internet access | −0.040 | −0.041 | ||
(0.052) | (0.052) | |||
Logarithm of total household income | −0.016 | −0.016 | ||
(0.010) | (0.010) | |||
Internet penetration rate | −0.839 *** | |||
(0.287) | ||||
The intercept term | 1.273 *** | 2.603 *** | 2.971 *** | 3.507 *** |
(0.032) | (0.255) | 0.280 | (0.334) | |
Adj R2 | 0.024 | 0.187 | 0.195 | 0.198 |
Variable Name | (1) |
---|---|
Mental Health | |
Internet use | −0.129 ** |
(0.049) | |
Controlled variable | Controlled |
Adj R2 | 0.191 |
Variables | (1) |
---|---|
Mental Health | |
Internet use_1 | −0.057 * |
(0.032) | |
Controlled variable | Controlled |
Adj R2 | 0.079 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yang, Y.; He, X. The Multi-Level Influencing Factors of Internet Use Among the Elderly Population and Its Association with Mental Health Promotion: Empirical Research Based on Mixed Cross-Sectional Data. Healthcare 2025, 13, 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151931
Yang Y, He X. The Multi-Level Influencing Factors of Internet Use Among the Elderly Population and Its Association with Mental Health Promotion: Empirical Research Based on Mixed Cross-Sectional Data. Healthcare. 2025; 13(15):1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151931
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Yifan, and Xinying He. 2025. "The Multi-Level Influencing Factors of Internet Use Among the Elderly Population and Its Association with Mental Health Promotion: Empirical Research Based on Mixed Cross-Sectional Data" Healthcare 13, no. 15: 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151931
APA StyleYang, Y., & He, X. (2025). The Multi-Level Influencing Factors of Internet Use Among the Elderly Population and Its Association with Mental Health Promotion: Empirical Research Based on Mixed Cross-Sectional Data. Healthcare, 13(15), 1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13151931