You are currently on the new version of our website. Access the old version .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
HealthcareHealthcare
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

9 February 2024

Managing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Experience of Managers in Healthcare: A Narrative Inquiry

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Nursing Development and Research Unit, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), via Gallino 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
2
Department of Nursing, Regional Hospital of Bellinzona e Valli, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), via Gallino 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
3
Department of Nursing, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), via Gallino 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
4
Department of Nursing, Pediatric Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), via Gallino 12, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
Healthcare2024, 12(4), 447;https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12040447
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

The pandemic represented a challenge for hospital managers at different levels, required to reorganise services without compromising care. This study aimed to analyse the experiences of hospital managers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A narrative inquiry was conducted in a multisite acute hospital. Data were collected through narratives and open-ended questions. Direct and non-direct-care managers were invited to participate. Data were analyzed considering Clandinin & Connelly’s (2000) framework and Braun & Clarke, (2006). Thirty-six narratives and open-ended question responses were analysed. Participants were nurses (n = 20), doctors, technicians, administrative and hospitality service managers. Themes were grouped into three narrative dimensions: (1) personal—“the emergency engulfed us”, (2) practical/professional—“managing the pandemic”, (3) social—“the strength of the team and people”. Different narrative threads were identified between direct-care and non direct-care managers. Problems faced, factors helpful for management and suggestions for improvement were also reported. The pandemic had an important impact on managers and their roles, in terms of the need for clear concise information, staff support, and adequate professional and technical resources. A sense of unity and belonging facilitated management.

1. Introduction

Described as a threat to global health [1], the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) first reported in December 2019 [2], now reports 505,035,185 cases worldwide with 6,210,719 deaths as of 21 April 2022 [3]. Globally, healthcare systems have responded to an unparalleled call to address the healthcare needs of vast numbers of individuals affected by COVID-19, requiring reorganisation of services, and re-allocation of resources [4,5,6].
Staff working in healthcare settings have described physical and psychological effects of the pandemic, often reporting concerns and anxiety over inadequate or lacking Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and contracting or transmitting the infection to patients or family [7,8,9,10]. Uncertainty was increased by the evolving situation, lack of timely communication and continued changes to practice [11]. Social isolation measures meant that inpatient care further intensified to incorporate additional emotional support replacing that previously provided by families and carers [12]. Moreover, staff redeployment, for some into intensive care specialities, left healthcare workers reporting stress, anxiety and feelings of inadequacy in care delivery [7,13].
Amid times of emotional burden, individuals rely on leadership for guidance [14] and healthcare managers have a pivotal role [15], supporting staff whilst ensuring services are not compromised. Leadership may affect psychological distress in employees [16] and its absence may lead to breakdown of trust and psychological safety [17]. Successful leadership through a crisis depends on open communication and collaboration [18], however challenges arise where managers themselves are confounded by uncertainty. As well as being personally affected by the pandemic, managers are in a unique position having to respond to both staff and organisational needs. Literature investigating the impact of COVID-19 on working practices across all occupations indicates a range of managerial challenges including provision of support systems for workers, managing resource limitations and supply chain management, remote working, respecting physical distancing requirements and human resource management [19,20]. Within the healthcare setting, challenges translate into a responsibility for implementing responsive care delivery models incorporating workforce planning strategies, and addressing issues relating to scope of practice and competency of staff [21]. Ensuring staff safety, psycho-emotional wellbeing, managing conflict and sustaining morale are described by nurse managers during the pandemic, with personal reflections on the role in terms of feeling unprepared, and overwhelmed by new tasks and duties [12,22,23]. It is evident therefore that persons in managerial roles of various levels also require support to lead in crisis situations, however support should be tailored to meet the requirements of the individual, and reflect peculiarities of context.
Hospital services in the canton Ticino in Switzerland are multi-centred across the region and centrally co-ordinated. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant re-organisation of services was conducted including identification of hospitals dedicated to care of patients affected by COVID-19 and mass redeployment of staff involving all hospital services. Managers were also faced with the unique challenge of managing a workforce heavily dependent on cross-border movement of hospital staff, dealing with border closures to limit virus spread and movement of workers [24]. In light of this situation, it was felt important to investigate the experiences and challenges faced by managers working at various levels within the organization.
The purpose of this study was:
  • to understand the experience of managers during the pandemic
  • to identify the difficulties and strategies used to face challenges within the managerial role during the pandemic
  • to describe factors perceived as helpful for managers in facing this critical period and proposals how to better manage a crisis situation

2. Materials and Methods

A narrative inquiry research approach was chosen, according to Clandinin & Connelly [25]. The narration of the experience informs the construction of knowledge at personal, social and professional identity levels [26].
The study included participants from three public hospitals in Switzerland: a general hospital, an oncology hospital and a paediatric hospital. Potential participants were directors and middle managers—nurses, doctors, administrators, technicians and from the hospitality sector. The research team worked within the same three public hospitals.
Data was collected in the form of narrated stories, and responses to three guiding questions. A brief guide was provided on how to prepare the narrative (Supplementary File S1). Potential participants were invited to take part in the study through a web link, disseminated via institutional websites. Participants were informed of the aims of the study, voluntary participation, that their answers would be anonymised, and assured confidentiality. The online format was available from 30 April 2020 to 31 August 2020, when data saturation was achieved. Collected data was stored on a password protected server accessible only to the research team.
Data analysis of the narratives was performed according to the framework of Clandinin & Connelly [25]. Each narrative was read several times to gain an overview and understand it in its entirety. Each narrative was analysed by 3 experienced qualitative researchers, using the 3 levels of justification: personal, practical/professional and social, each mutually informing [27]. With regard to the first level of justification, threads of stories or narratives concerning the personal sphere such as thoughts, feelings, and emotions were identified. In the second level, the focus was on personal experience regarding the role played during the pandemic, highlighting what participants experienced and learned from a professional point of view. In the third level the narrative threads captured the experience of the people within the social dimension, the impact of their experience within the social context of the organisation and family, what was important and what had been learned. For each level, narrative threads were grouped into themes and parts of the narrative were identified, called micro-stories, which highlight the participants experiences during the pandemic. Narratives belonging to nurses and doctors (direct-care group), and the group of administrative, technician and hospitality service managers (non direct-care group) were analysed separately. Responses to guiding questions were analysed following a thematic analytical approach [28]. Analyses were performed by two experienced qualitative researchers.
The study involved healthcare professionals, and according to Swiss Human Research Act, Article 3 (2011, updated 2021) no formal ethics committee approval was required. Participants were asked to avoid the use of names within the text and reference specific circumstances that could identify the individual. To ensure confidentially and anonymity all identifying information was removed before processing the data.

3. Results

3.1. Participants

Two-hundred and fifty managers were invited to participate (179 doctors/nurses, and 71 administrative, technician and hospitality service). Thirty-six narratives were received and analysed (14.4% response rate): 20 from nurses, six medical staff, three technician, six administrative and one from a hospitality service (Table 1).
Table 1. Respondent demographics.

3.2. Narratives

The narratives were analysed separately (direct-care and non direct-care managers), and for each group, the main themes and narrative threads were identified for each level of justification (Table 2).
Table 2. Level of justification—themes and narrative threads.
In both groups the same themes were identified but with similarities and differences in the narrative threads for each level of justification. We identified the following themes: “the emergency engulfed us” (personal dimension), “managing the pandemic” (practical/professional dimension) and “the strength of the team and the people” (social dimension). For each level of justification, micro-stories characterising the experience of the participants were selected. Each micro-story was entitled with the key words of the narrative (Table 3).
Table 3. Micro stories.

3.2.1. Personal Level “The Emergency Has Engulfed Us”

Respondents narrated how the emergency had taken over everything—people, professionals, hospitals, citizens, families, feelings, security, and the lives of everyone. It was described as something that engulfs, and an invisible enemy to be fought.
In the narrative threads, both groups highlighted the difficulty of having a realistic perception of the problem, and of the seriousness of the pandemic, which initially appeared to be another countries problem. Instead images broadcast in the media played an important role in raising awareness of the problem—no longer being someone else’s problem. Direct-care and non direct-care managers described living in extreme uncertainty, experiencing fear and suffering. “Nothing was ever the same again” was recounted several times by direct-care managers, where life continued but also became stuck and everything was different. In both goups, narratives described how certainties collapsed and the fear of infection and contamination was predominant. Nurses also narrated how their lives had changed, in particular their professional life highlighting their personal sufferance when having to support patients in isolation, substituting family who could not be present. Both groups used war-like language, in particular nurses used the words “going to the front” to emphasise feelings. They declared themselves on the lookout, and ready to respond quickly to needs at work and home. The non direct-care managers described a “surreal” environment where change became a constant.

3.2.2. Practical/Professional Level: “Managing the Pandemic”

In both groups, narrative threads concerned the sudden change of routine, and difficulties linked to this new experience. Administrative managers narrated the need for continual change, with support from military services for the healthcare team and the possibility for nurses and doctors to stay in nearby hotels. Difficulties were described in reorganising the hospital structure and staff to cope with the emergency and the new needs that derived from it. Nurses stories highlighted the experience as unique and in a certain sense unimaginable, for which one was absolutely unprepared. Making choices was not easy, particularly when asking staff to change shifts or move units, often with little or no advanced notice. For the non direct-care managers, difficulties were described where they sometimes had to do things that they did not want to do.
In both groups, information played a fundamental role. For the direct-care group, managing one’s own team in the pandemic phase required taking on new aspects of the role such as gathering as much information as possible. This was important to allow the team to work safely and to have the situation under control, managing one’s own fears and at the same time reassuring the team. Often direct-care managers highlighted being submersed in information, sometimes contradictory and changing rapidly, making it difficult to select which information to share. In contrast non direct-care managers described difficulty in being able to respond to the questions of their teams due to the lack of information available.
For the direct-care managers, the pandemic also represented a personal and professional challenge, where uncertainty and fear allowed people to learn from the experience. Some narrated how this led them to reflect on personal/professional values and the need to make lifestyle changes. Others pointed out how facing ‘dramatic’ situations was an opportunity to open up to something new, changing one’s way of thinking and experience what it means to share. These new situations with particular regard to patient care, were a stimulus to study and learn more. Both groups narrated the lack of PPE in the initial phase of the pandemic. One non direct-care manager described not only the difficulty of accessing PPE but personal suffering as he was unable then to provide this to staff who needed it.

3.2.3. Social Level: The Strength of the Team and the People

Several elements affected groups at both intraprofessional and interprofessional levels such as the increase of knowledge and interprofessional collaboration. Another element was the consideration and understanding between staff within smaller groups, but also across the organization, showing a strong sense of unity and belonging.
In both groups, narrative threads emphasized how awareness that the crisis situation involved everyone and at all levels, lead to a sense of unity and commitment that some nurses described as moving at times. Everyone moves in the same direction, towards common objectives, searching together for possible solutions to problems encountered. New forms of collaboration were being experimented with.
Another socio-cultural issue reported by both groups was that of playing a leadership role. Reflections in this regard emphasize how the role of the leader was facilitated by collaboration and knowing that “one could count on the concrete support of so many people”. In a narration from the non direct-care managers, it was reported how being a leader in such a situation transmitted great energy.
Another element common in both groups was the importance of support from managers own managers, which was shown through concrete actions, proximity and support, where Senior Management attended hospital wards to be close to those on the front line. This created a strong bond between people with different roles and within different groups. In the direct-care group, the importance of support from family was also strongly narrated.
Both groups highlighted a strong sense of organizational belonging. Nurses also emphasized how their professional values played a central role, giving everything to make it possible to deal with the dramatic situation they were experiencing in a ‘unique’ way. In the narratives an administrative manager focused on major lessons learned, the exceptional results achieved by the organization as a whole in dealing with this emergency. Having a common goal and a strong sense of urgency made it possible to overcome unitary visions and ‘entanglements’ that normal day-to-day routines hinder.

3.3. Responses to Guiding Questions

In addition to completion of the narratives, respondents also answered one or more of the guiding questions (Supplementary File S1), relating to problems and strategies to deal with issues, factors helpful in facing the pandemic and proposals to better manage a pandemic situation. Summaries of findings are presented in Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6.
Table 4. Problems and strategies to deal with issues.
Table 5. Factors helpful in facing the pandemic.
Table 6. Proposals to better manage a crisis situation.
Regarding problems and strategies to deal with issues (Table 4), three themes were identified: emotions, the managers’ role during the pandemic and communication flow & adapting to the situation. Many of the problems identified and strategies to deal with these problems were elaborated in the narratives, however some were novel aspects reported below.
Regarding the theme of emotions, a sense of responsibility was described by both groups—for non direct-care managers this was being aware that everything depended on them, while for the direct-care managers there was greater awareness of routine responsibilities. Frustration was described in both groups of managers. For direct-care managers this was in terms of not being able to be with the staff caring for COVID-19 patients, the closed minded approach of some colleagues, and not having enough time to take the best decision. For the non direct-care group, this related to how priority was given to hospitals dealing with patients affected by COVID-19, while greater burden was left on those who remained to perform usual tasks.
Regarding the managers role during the pandemic, both groups shared problems related to reorganisation. For direct-care managers this was shifting appointments, remote patient management, and revising treatment strategies, while for non direct-care managers this was closing outpatient activities. Both groups of managers described how their role included promoting personnel well-being be that through support, working flexibility and creating a positive climate. Nurses also highlighted the difficulty of performing dual roles—clinical and managerial, and having adequately trained staff for critical areas. One non direct-care manager described how despite personal feelings of tension, his role was to remain positive with his staff.
Regarding factors reported to be helpful in facing the pandemic (Table 5), three themes were identified: personal characteristics, knowledge and competency, support from inside/outside of the organisation and ‘we’re all in the same boat’. In addition to the findings from the narratives, regarding the theme personal characteristics, both groups reported the importance of professionalism. They spoke of sharing and addressing issues together—for the direct-care managers this was with other managers in weekly meetings, while for non direct-care managers the creation of a chat group to share information was useful. In the theme ‘we’re all in the same boat’, other than that emerging from the narrations, both groups highlighted a positive working environment as a helpful factor. For nurse managers the welcome and support from Intensive Care Unit staff to redeployed nurses was particularly helpful during what was a professionally difficult situation.
Respondents were also asked to give suggestions based on their experience, of what could be improved in order to better manage a crisis situation (Table 6). Proposals common to both groups related to the provision of support—for those who experienced the virus at first hand and in terms of encouraging active communication, sharing emotions and experiences between managers and their teams. Another proposal was improving information and communication. While non direct-care mangers suggested better use of the hospital app to receive timely and updated documents and key information, direct-care managers suggested the use of summaries, filtering, and coordinating information provision to ensure it was concise, useful and pertinent. Having an emergency plan in place to deal with crises was important for both groups, with another joint proposal was greater awareness of technical resources, human resources and having adequately trained staff. Both groups felt there were lessons to be learned regarding patient care, with direct-care managers focusing on learning from what worked, sharing good practice, and developing transversal services, while non direct-care managers suggested better transmission of information regarding hospital safety to avoid missed care.
Direct-care managers also made suggestion such as avoiding bellic language, valuing both technical and relational competencies, avoiding the creation of false expectations in the general population, respecting the rules, and involving the right people in decision-making process.

4. Discussion

The aim of our study was to understand the experiences of managers during the pandemic using narrative inquiry. Through narration, people can reflect on their experiences, drawing useful lessons from such that can be useful for each person but also for the organization as a whole. We also asked respondents to share their problems, factors facilitating their role and suggestions to improve management of a crisis. Results highlight the principal difficulties but also that which has allowed participants to face difficult situations as individuals and managers.
Media and particularly social media, have been key instruments of communication during the pandemic, providing a significant quantity of news with variable quality of information [29,30]. This contributes to the challenge of having a realistic understanding of what is happening as described by both groups of participants in this study. The pandemic has impacted both at personal and social levels [31] with imposed changes, some of which remain and may not return to ‘normal’ within the foreseeable future [32]. Participants within this study agreed, describing their experience of a changed and unpredictable situation, never to be the same again. War metaphors were common within the narratives, in particular by nurses, having also been reported within the literature [33], and reflecting a sense of seriousness and urgency [34].
Within the main issues emerging, a key role noted at the ‘personal level’ was represented by emotions experienced, independently of the managers role. An emergency situation which was reported to have ‘engulfed’ respondents in this study, brought uncertainty, fear, and mirrors findings not only for managers but generally within the healthcare setting and beyond [22,35]. Fear of being a source of contamination for oneself, family or colleagues is commonly reported by staff dealing with patients affected by COVID-19 [8,9,19], however this was also observed across managers in this study, who may not have been in direct contact with patients.
Nurses described personal suffering due to the emotional emptiness of patients, speaking of a surreal atmosphere in which they found themselves as substitutes, for the presence and comfort that is usually brought by family members, a finding also reported by managers in mental health centers [12]. Frustration of nurse managers was described, caused by being unable to be with their team, with similar reports in the literature where leaders described being powerless, able only to listen [36]. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, staff were often redeployed and some centres had reserve teams to support high volume clinical activity and backfill staff in case of absence [37]. Without such support however, staff assume the burden and frustration of covering the remaining activities, as suggested by a non-direct care manager in this study.
The need to introduce organisational changes was described by both groups in this study. In particular, for nurse manager this referred to sudden and frequent changes, having to choose who to ask to change shift or to move units, as described elsewhere in the literature often with little or no advanced notice [22,38]. Similar issues with reorganisation of services were reported by direct and non-direct care managers, reflecting reports within the literature of how services were consolidated and prioritised in order to maintain operations with available resources [21].
Organisational changes often meant changes in roles, and it emerged that nurses were challenged by what had often become a dual role—not only managerial but also clinical, a finding reported by other nurse managers covering administrative and clinical roles as well [39]. A lack of staff experienced in the management of critical care patients is reported in the literature with, similarly to findings in this study, with attempts to support skill development by working with more experienced nurses [38], a welcoming environment was also described by nurse managers in the guiding questions to have been useful in this difficult situation.
The speed with which information was transmitted, sometimes being contradictory, required adaptation to new situations, guidelines and procedures to follow. Scenario planning is virtually impossible [40] and it is therefore unsurprising that these managers described their difficulty. Confusion and uncertainty in this period is a common finding [11] as real-time dissemination of clear information to staff is an arduous task. Interestingly, this study highlighted how health professional managers described this period as information overload. Nurse managers in this study emphasised how such information challenges the impact this had in relation to doubts in their decision-making based on information available and the ethical and moral implications, contributing to existing literature on the subject [41]. Other non direct-care manager roles described a paucity of information limiting their ability to respond to questions posed by staff. Findings suggest modes of communication require revisiting to address each group’s needs.
This unprecedented healthcare emergency has seen evidence of adaptation and resilience in healthcare staff [7,41], also described in this study by nurses, along with greater understanding between staff groups. Facing the emergency, and activating organisational and staff resources has been facilitated by the ability to share knowledge and skills internal and external to teams, and recognise and value creativity, despite this being perceived as unchartered territory for many. Fostering a supportive environment in which open communication and collaborative relationships are realised can promote effective decision-making [42,43], as suggested by both groups in this study.
In both groups of managers, the sense of responsibility was evident, a finding that has been reported by nurse managers within the literature [44]. Non direct-care managers described the difficulty of maintaining staff morale, trying to show positivity and maintaining calm despite the tense situation as is described within the literature [14,22]. This sense of responsibility is also linked to the desire to ensure staff safety, which is a particular challenge in a pandemic. A focus on staff well-being was also observed, similar to findings in the literature including teamwork, communication, putting people first and helping with uncertainty [45,46]. Managers in both groups described their difficulty with timely access to PPE for their staff, and ensuring safety of those caring for patients affected by COVID-19 as reported elsewhere [7].
In terms of the ‘social level’, many of the themes here are resonant of those within disaster nursing literature including improvisation, collaboration, leadership, community support and crossing of boundaries in response to the crisis [47]. The unity of the team was reported by both groups of managers to be of importance, in line with the willingness of staff, colleagues and creation of reciprocal trust [18].
Being in the ‘same boat’ and moving in the ‘same direction’ highlighted the unity of groups working towards a common goal, as collaboration between professionals was key to resolving problems occurring [18]. There is evidence in the literature of how the COVID-19 has incited change in organisations, regarding new projects, new collaborations and overcoming barriers [48], and although this was also observed in this study, participants also reflected on why such barriers existed beforehand how the ‘common goal’ was the driver to surmount such difficulties. Peer support was described as beneficial in improving mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic [49] so it is not surprising that findings here from direct care managers described how sharing issues together was valuable.
Both groups of managers emphasised the decisive role played by the support and backing of the organization, of its managers and that took the form of being there and being available. While the managers role may be seen as one where difficult decisions are made that are not always shared by the team, nurse managers in this study described their experience of support from both their managers and their team. Perceived organisational support and supervisor accessibility are associated with job-related well-being and affective commitment to the organization [50], being areas to focus support in case of future emergencies. Support for healthcare workers from partners and family is also recognised [51] and was evident within in the group of direct care managers this group as a safe harbour allowing one to return to normality for a short while.
Our findings showed the strong sense of belonging to the organization in both groups of managers, which was a winning factor in facing the difficult situation, giving motivation, strength, and the energy to face any obstacle or difficulty. It is suggested that sharing stressful experiences may promote cohesion between the employee and organization through emotional bonding and shared identity [52], surely a factor to build on in the future.
In proposals to improve management of a crisis, both groups described the importance of having support—psychological support for team members caring for patients affected by COVID-19—as suggested in the literature [53,54], and the importance sharing emotions and the teams experiences [55]. Other proposals included effective communication as reported by Abi et al., [56], and having an emergency plan in place to deal with such situations, a theme mirrored within the literature [57]. Other shared suggestions included having adequate PPE learning from the experience and developing specific knowledge and competencies in order to be prepared for similar situations in the future, findings which are supported within the literature [7,58,59,60]. The process of reflection on the experiences of employees may contribute to organization learning and improve organizational know-how, impacting on employee behavior [61].
While this paper provides an in-depth view of the experiences of managers during the pandemic, it is recognised that there are limitations with the study. Despite an invitation to all managers to describe their experiences, just under 15% of invited participants responded. While this is a small number, a range of managers were represented providing their experiences. Participants were invited from just three hospitals across a multi-site setting. It is not possible to confirm whether the experiences of managers in hospitals closer to the Swiss-Italian border had similar experiences. One limitation of the study was the impossibility for researchers and participants to meet during the pandemic due to restrictions in relation to personal contact.

5. Conclusions

Our study is focused on analysing the experience of managers involved in managing during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results revealed common aspects in experiences related to the initial difficulty in realistically perceiving the problem, which was underestimated, and the role of the media in fostering greater awareness. Fear of contamination, facing the unknown and the climate of uncertainty brought about important changes in both private and working lives. Changes also concerned language used, being war–like, where there is an enemy to defeat and a front on which to fight.
Managing during the pandemic meant having to make difficult choices quickly, relating to the reorganisation of services and activities, affecting staff who were required to be available and flexible. Information was a highly critical element and dealt with inadequately. Modes of communicating information should be adapted to respond to the needs of different managerial groups.
Challenges related to managers roles in such a complex context allowed them to learn and change established ways of thinking both at work and in their private lives. Organisational learning occurred both in the individual operational units and between the different organisational units. Dynamic environments were described in which intraprofessional and interprofessional collaboration took place. Working towards a single goal, each one providing knowledge and skills, allowed everyone to move in the same direction and strengthen the sense of belonging to the organisation, which was a key element and should be considered for the future. For all groups, the leader’s role in fostering a supportive working environment among peers and towards the team was fundamental. Leadership at various levels, that is sensitive to and able to promote these values, is an important factor in the development and success of a healthcare organisation. Future research may be directed towards the investigation of which styles of leadership may encourage these values in particular during crisis situations.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/healthcare12040447/s1, File S1: Brief guideline for participants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T., L.B., S.C., D.S., L.C., A.B. (Annette Biegger), A.B. (Alessandro Bressan) and D.V.; methodology, A.T., S.J.L. and D.V.; validation, A.T. and S.J.L.; formal analysis, A.T. and S.J.L.; resources, A.T., S.C., D.S., L.C. and A.B. (Annette Biegger), A.B. (Alessandro Bressan) and D.V.; data curation, L.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T., S.J.L. and D.V.; writing—review and editing, A.T., S.J.L., L.B., S.C., D.S., L.C., A.B. (Annette Biegger), A.B. (Alessandro Bressan) and D.V.; visualization, A.T. and S.J.L.; supervision, A.T.; project administration, A.T. and D.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to the study involving healthcare professionals and hospital employees, and according to Swiss Human Research Act, Article 3 (2011, updated 2021), no formal ethics committee approval was required.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Sabrina Fiala and Sara Levati for their contribution to data analysis, Giovanni Rabito for assistance in data collection and the participants for sharing their experiences.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Liao, X.; Wang, B.; Kang, Y. Novel coronavirus infection during the 2019–2020 epidemic: Preparing intensive care units-the experience in Sichuan Province, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020, 46, 357–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X.; et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. World Health Organization. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 22 April 2022).
  4. Juvet, T.M.; Corbaz-Kurth, S.; Roos, P.; Benzakour, L.; Cereghetti, S.; Moullec, G.; Suard, J.C.; Vieux, L.; Wozniak, H.; Pralong, J.A.; et al. Adapting to the unexpected: Problematic work situations and resilience strategies in healthcare institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic’s first wave. Saf. Sci. 2021, 139, 105277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. O’Rielly, C.; Ng-Kamstra, J.; Kania-Richmond, A.; Dort, J.; White, J.; Robert, J.; Brindle, M.; Sauro, K. Surgery and COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of the first wave of COVID-19 on surgical services. BMJ Open 2021, 11, e043966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Simões, J.; Moreira Magalhães, J.P.; Biscaia, A.; da Luz Pereira, A.; Augusto, G.F.; Fronteira, I. Organisation of the State, model of health system and COVID-19 health outcomes in six European countries, during the first months of the COVID-19 epidemic in 2020. Int. J. Health Plan. Manag. 2021, 36, 1874–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Catania, G.; Zanini, M.; Hayter, M.; Timmins, F.; Dasso, N.; Ottonello, G.; Aleo, G.; Sasso, L.; Bagnasco, A. Lessons from Italian front-line nurses’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative descriptive study. J. Nurs. Manag. 2020, 29, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Labrague, L.J.; De Los Santos, J. COVID-19 anxiety among front-line nurses: Predictive role of organisational support, personal resilience and social support. J. Nurs. Manag. 2020, 28, 1653–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Martínez-López, J.Á.; Lázaro-Pérez, C.; Gómez-Galán, J.; Fernández-Martínez, M. Psychological Impact of COVID-19 Emergency on Health Professionals: Burnout Incidence at the Most Critical Period in Spain. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sperling, D. Ethical dilemmas, perceived risk, and motivation among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nurs. Ethics 2021, 28, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nelson, H.; Hubbard Murdoch, N.; Norman, K. The Role of Uncertainty in the Experiences of Nurses During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study. Can. J. Nurs. Res. 2021, 53, 124–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kagan, I.; Shor, R.; Ben Aharon, I.; Yerushalmi, S.; Kigli-Shemesh, R.; Gelman, S.; Itzhaki, M. A Mixed-Methods Study of Nurse Managers’ Managerial and Clinical Challenges in Mental Health Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2021, 53, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vera San Juan, N.; Camilleri, M.; Jeans, J.P.; Monkhouse, A.; Chisnall, G.; Vindrola-Padros, C. Redeployment and training of healthcare professionals to Intensive Care during COVID-19: A systematic review. BMJ Open 2022, 12, e050038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Losty, L.S.; Bailey, K.D. Leading Through Chaos: Perspectives from Nurse Executives. Nurs. Admin. Q 2021, 45, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Aini, Q. Management Skill and Leadership: A Case Study from Hospital Managers of Charity Business in Health. J. Soc. Sci. Res. 2018, 4, 478–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, F.; Ahmed, F.; Faraz, N.A. Caring for the caregiver during COVID-19 outbreak: Does inclusive leadership improve psychological safety and curb psychological distress? A cross-sectional study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2020, 110, 103725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rangachari, P.; L Woods, J. Preserving Organizational Resilience, Patient Safety, and Staff Retention during COVID-19 Requires a Holistic Consideration of the Psychological Safety of Healthcare Workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kanter, R.M. Leading Your Team Past the Peak of a Crisis. Harvard Business Review. 2020. Available online: https://hbr.org/2020/04/leading-your-team-past-the-peak-of-a-crisis (accessed on 30 April 2023).
  19. Bianchi, M.; Prandi, C.; Bonetti, L. Experience of middle management nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland: A qualitative study. J. Nurs. Manag. 2021, 29, 1956–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sigahi, T.; Kawasaki, B.C.; Bolis, I.; Morioka, S.N. A systematic review on the impacts of Covid-19 on work: Contributions and a path forward from the perspectives of ergonomics and psychodynamics of work. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2021, 31, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Paterson, C.; Gobel, B.; Gosselin, T.; Haylock, P.J.; Papadopoulou, C.; Slusser, K.; Rodriguez, A.; Pituskin, E. Oncology Nursing During a Pandemic: Critical Reflections in the Context of COVID-19. Semin. Oncol. Nurs. 2020, 36, 151028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gab Allah, A.R.G. Challenges facing nurse managers during and beyond COVID-19 pandemic in relation to perceived organizational support. Nurs. Forum 2021, 56, 539–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Goh, A.M.J.; Chia, J.; Zainuddin, Z.; Ahmad, N.; Abdul Manaf, M.S. Challenges faced by direct care nurse managers during the initial coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A reflection. Proc. Singap. Healthc. 2021, 30, 85–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shaffer, F.A.; Rocco, G.; Stievano, A. Nurse and health professional migration during COVID-19. La migrazione di infermieri ed altri professionisti sanitari durante il COVID-19. Prof. Inferm. 2020, 73, 129–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Clandinin, D.J.; Connelly, F.M. Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research; Jossey-Bass Publishers: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lindsay, G. Constructing a nursing identity: Reflecting on and reconstructing experience. Reflective Pract. 2006, 7, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lindsay, G.; Schwind, J.K. Arts-informed narrative inquiry as a practice development methodology in mental health. Int. Pract. Dev. J. 2015, 5, 1–12. Available online: https://www.fons.org/library/journal.aspx (accessed on 3 June 2020). [CrossRef]
  28. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mach, K.J.; Salas Reyes, R.; Pentz, B.; Taylor, J.; Costa, C.A.; Cruz, S.G.; Thomas, K.E.; Arnott, J.C.; Donald, R.; Jagannathan, K.; et al. News media coverage of COVID-19 public health and policy information. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2021, 8, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Tsao, S.F.; Chen, H.; Tisseverasinghe, T.; Yang, Y.; Li, L.; Butt, Z.A. What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: A scoping review. Lancet Digit. Health 2021, 3, e175–e194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ventriglio, A.; Castaldelli-Maia, J.M.; Torales, J.; Chumakov, E.M.; Bhugra, D. Personal and social changes in the time of COVID-19. Ir. J. Psychol. Med. 2021, 38, 315–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Fenwick, M.; McCahery, J.A.; Vermulen, E.P.M. Will the world ever be the same after COVID-19) Two lessons from the first global crisis of a digital age. Eur. Bus. Organ. Law Rev. 2021, 22, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Semino, E. “Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters”—Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Commun. 2021, 36, 50–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Flusberg, S.J.; Matlock, T.; Thibodeau, P.H. Metaphors for the War (or Race) against climate change. Environ. Commun. 2017, 11, 769–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Terblanche, N.H.D. Managers’ responses to the initial stages of the Covid-19 pandemic: An executive coaching perspective. Pers. Rev. 2022, 51, 1543–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hølge-Hazelton, B.; Kjerholt, M.; Rosted, E.; Thestrup Hansen, S.; Zacho Borre, L.; McCormack, B. Improving Person-Centred Leadership: A Qualitative Study of Ward Managers’ Experiences During the COVID-19 Crisis. Risk Manag. Healthc. Policy 2021, 14, 1401–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Qasim, Z.; Sjoholm, L.O.; Volgraf, J.; Sailes, S.; Nance, M.L.; Perks, D.H.; Grewal, H.; Meyer, L.K.; Walker, J.; Koenig, G.J.; et al. Trauma center activity and surge response during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic-the Philadelphia story. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020, 89, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Deldar, K.; Froutan, R.; Ebadi, A. Nurse Managers’ Perceptions and Experiences during the COVID-19 Crisis: A Qualitative Study. Iran J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 2021, 26, 238–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Jackson, J.; Nowell, L. ‘The office of disaster management’ nurse managers’ experiences during COVID-19: A qualitative interview study using thematic analysis. J. Nurs. Manag. 2021, 29, 2392–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Amis, J.M.; Janz, B.D. Leading Change in Response to COVID-19. J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 2020, 56, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Villa, M.; Balice-Bourgois, C.; Tolotti, A.; Falcó-Pegueroles, A.; Barello, S.; Luca, E.C.; Clivio, L.; Biegger, A.; Valcarenghi, D.; Bonetti, L. Ethical Conflict and Its Psychological Correlates among Hospital Nurses in the Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study within Swiss COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Wards. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wymer, J.A.; Stucky, C.H.; De Jong, M.J. Nursing Leadership and COVID-19: Defining the Shadows and Leading Ahead of the Data. Nurse Lead. 2021, 19, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vázquez-Calatayud, M.; Regaira-Martínez, E.; Rumeu-Casares, C.; Paloma-Mora, B.; Esain, A.; Oroviogoicoechea, C. Experiences of frontline nurse managers during the COVID-19: A qualitative study. J. Nurs. Manag. 2022, 30, 79–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. White, J.H. A Phenomenological Study of Nurse Managers’ and Assistant Nurse Managers’ Experiences during the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States. J. Nurs. Manag. 2021, 29, 1525–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nembhard, I.M.; Burns, L.R.; Shortell, S.M. Responding to Covid-19: Lessons from management research. NEJM Catal. Innov. Care Deliv. 2020, 1, 1–7. Available online: https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.20.0111 (accessed on 5 January 2024).
  46. Sulaiman, M.A.B.A.; Ahmed, M.N.; Shabbir, M.S. Covid-19 challenges and human resource management in organized retail operations. Utop. Prax. Latinoam. 2020, 25, 81–92. Available online: https://zenodo.org/records/4280092 (accessed on 5 January 2024).
  47. Wall, B.M.; Keeling, A.W. Nurses on the Front Line: When Disaster Strikes, 1878–2010; Springer Publishing Company: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  48. Turner, S.; Botero-Tovar, N.; Herrera, M.A.; Borda Kuhlmann, J.P.; Ortiz, F.; Ramírez, J.C.; Maldonado, L.F. Systematic review of experiences and perceptions of key actors and organisations at multiple levels within health systems internationally in responding to COVID-19. Implement. Sci. 2021, 16, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Suresh, R.; Alam, A.; Karkossa, Z. Using Peer Support to Strengthen Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review. Front. Psychiatry 2021, 12, 714181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Mihalache, M.; Mihalache, O.R. How workplace support for the COVID-19 pandemic and personality traits affect changes in employees’ affective commitment to the organization and job-related well-being. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 61, 295–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Alnazly, E.; Khraisat, O.M.; Al-Bashaireh, A.M.; Bryant, C.L. Anxiety, depression, stress, fear and social support during COVID-19 pandemic among Jordanian healthcare workers. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Caligiuri, P.; De Cieri, H.; Minbaeva, D.; Verbeke, A.; Zimmermann, A. International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2020, 51, 697–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Abu Mansour, S.I.; Abu Shosha, G.M. Experiences of first-line nurse managers during COVID-19: A Jordanian qualitative study. J. Nurs. Manag. 2022, 30, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Joslin, D.; Joslin, H. Nursing Leadership COVID-19 Insight Survey: Key Concerns, Primary Challenges, and Expectations for the Future. Nurse Lead. 2020, 18, 527–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. D’Auria, G.; De Smet, A. Leadership in a crisis: Responding to the coronavirus outbreak and future challenges. Psychology 2020, 22, 273–287. [Google Scholar]
  56. Abdi, Z.; Lega, F.; Ebeid, N.; Ravaghi, H. Role of hospital leadership in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. Health Serv. Manag. Res. 2022, 35, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hossny, E.K.; Morsy, S.M.; Ahmed, A.M.; Saleh, M.S.M.; Alenezi, A.; Sorour, M.S. Management of the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges, practices, and organizational support. BMC Nurs. 2022, 21, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Berkow, S.; Virkstis, K.; Herleth, A.; Whitemarsh, K.; Rewers, L. An Executive Strategy to Support Long-Term Clinician Engagement Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Nurs. Admin. 2020, 50, 616–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Bijani, M.; Karimi, S.; Khaleghi, A.; Gholampoor, Y.; Fereidouni, Z. Exploring senior managers’ perceptions of the COVID-19 Crisis in Iran: A qualitative content analysis study. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2021, 21, 1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sanders, J.; Balcom, C. Clinical leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic: Reflections and lessons learned. Healthc. Manag. Forum 2021, 34, 316–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hofstede, G. Attitudes, values and organizational culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organ. Stud. 1998, 19, 477–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
On the Effect of Vibrotactile Stimulation in Essential Tremor
Previous
Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet in Children and Adolescents and Association with Multiple Outcomes: An Umbrella Review
Next