Next Article in Journal
Health Professionals’ Perspectives on Commercially Available Intravenous Nutrient Therapies: A Preliminary Report
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluating the Accuracy of Upper Limb Movement in the Sagittal Plane among Computer Users during the COVID-19 Pandemic
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/healthcare12030385
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Harm Attempts Observed in a Hospital Emergency Department

by
Elena Fernández-Martínez
1,
Andrea Barros-Martínez
2,
María Cristina Martínez-Fernández
3,* and
Marta Quiñones-Pérez
2
1
SALBIS Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of León, 24071 León, Spain
2
Emergency Department, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León CAULE, 24008 León, Spain
3
SALBIS Research Group, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ponferrada Campus, University of León, Ponferrada, 24401 León, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(3), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030385
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 30 January 2024 / Accepted: 31 January 2024 / Published: 2 February 2024
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Suicide is a significant public health concern, with one million lives lost to it every year. Suicidal ideation and attempts are markers of high risk. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a negative psychological impact on the population. This study aims to describe and analyze the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of patients who have received medical attention for self-harm attempts in a hospital emergency department, comparing the period before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This is a descriptive, retrospective study that collected data from medical records of patients who received care for self-harm attempts in the emergency department. The data included cases from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. In total, 529 cases of self-harm attempts were identified, of which 62.8% were female. The number of post-pandemic self-harm attempts significantly increased compared to the period before the pandemic. The most used method for self-harm was medication ingestion. This study revealed that over one-third of the participants had previously attempted suicide. Most self-harm attempts were made by women in the 10–20 or 41–50 age groups, with a history of psychiatric illness and multiple medications. The study results also highlighted an increase in self-harm attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) states that suicide claims approximately one million lives globally each year [1], translating to about 3000 individuals daily. In Spain, suicide-related deaths saw a 1.6% increase from 2020, with a total of 4003 fatalities reported in 2021 [2]. Acts of self-harm, defined as intentional self-inflicted harm with potential suicidal outcomes, are a significant concern. The National Statistics Institute of Spain (INE) approximates that, for every suicide, there are between ten and forty suicide attempts [3,4]. Both suicidal ideation and intent are considered high-risk indicators, and addressing these factors is vital in averting progression to more severe stages. However, the WHO does not officially report data on this subject [5,6].
Self-harm is a significant risk factor for suicide mortality [7]. Therefore, it is crucial to acknowledge that there are several overlooked stages preceding suicide within the scope of suicidal behavior. These stages, as mentioned in the text, include periods of help-seeking and may signal underlying mental health issues. Some researchers propose that if these risks can be identified and mitigated, suicide could be categorized as a preventable health concern [5,8,9]. Studies have shown that the risk of suicide escalates in the six months following a self-harm attempt, with the initial month being the most critical. Consequently, it is imperative to provide post-discharge follow-up care to avert future attempts [10,11]. This underscores the necessity to highlight the significance of prevention and promotion, a requirement for programs that educate about emotional health, and the availability of therapeutic tools that can deter short-term suicide attempts and prevent the loss of numerous lives in the long term [5]. Therefore, understanding the characteristics that predispose individuals to self-harm attempts, identifying the most susceptible groups, and directly targeting them is required.
A positive correlation exists between social isolation and suicide, with social support being deemed a protective factor [12]. Suicidal actions are often triggered in crisis situations, such as financial hardships, familial disputes, chronic diseases, romantic separations, bereavement, or instances of abuse [11]. Contrary to expectations, a study has shown that educational attainment is not an effective means of equipping individuals with life skills [13]. A study conducted in Spain suggests that the most common triggers for suicidal behavior are related to problems within couples and families. In both cases, arguments are a frequent factor, with women being more likely to exhibit suicidal behavior [14]. The WHO has formulated the ‘LIVE LIFE’ Guide to counter suicide through measures like the early detection of suicidal thoughts or behaviors, monitoring individuals at risk, and imparting socioemotional skill education from adolescence [15].
The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the cessation of public activities and the implementation of restrictive measures. In Spain, the pandemic brought about by the COVID-19 virus forced the government to declare a state of alarm (Royal Decree 463/2020, of 14 March), for the management of the health crisis situation [16]. Strict control measures were implemented in Spain to combat the COVID-19 outbreak. Initially, travel within the country’s regions was prohibited, and people were only allowed to leave their homes for essential activities such as shopping or accessing health services. Later, time slots were established for people to access the streets, and de-escalation began by limiting crowded spaces [17]. The activation of these health emergency measures helped to bring the COVID-19 outbreak in Spain under control, and the de-escalation phases began in May. The state of alert ended on 21 June 2020 [18]. Several studies have confirmed that this has had a negative psychological impact on the population, which can be attributed to the loss of routine and a significant reduction in physical and social contact [10,19,20,21,22]. Furthermore, the economic impact of the pandemic, including increased unemployment, may lead to a rise in suicide attempts among individuals without a history of mental illness [23]. Moreover, adolescents are a particularly vulnerable group due to their developmental stage and their need to satisfy their peers, making them susceptible to future psychological adjustment issues. Changes in society and its problems can have an impact on young people’s attitudes and values. It is important to reinforce positive behaviors to help children build a positive self-image and encourage their participation in decision-making. This strengthens their role in society. The proper management of free time is crucial for their health [24]. During quarantine, individuals may experience isolation and loneliness, which can increase the risk of suicide [5,19,21,25,26]. The European Health Survey in Spain reported an increase in disinterest in activities outside of everyday life or feelings of depression or sadness during the pandemic [27]. The WHO highlights the significant issue of mental health disorders affecting almost one billion people, resulting in a negative impact on their quality of life. A systematic review of the influence of COVID-19 on suicide attempts indicates that the unforeseen behavioral changes during the pandemic may have played a role in the escalating trend of suicide attempts [28].
The pandemic has been recognized as a substantial factor leading to emotional instability in the aftermath of confinement. Research has indicated a 25% surge in instances of depression and anxiety during the pandemic’s initial year [1]. However, there is a paucity of research investigating whether this increase has precipitated a rise in suicide attempts [5,11,19,29]. Consequently, this study’s primary objective is to delineate and contrast cases of attempted suicide and their attributes pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic within a tertiary hospital’s emergency department.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Design and Sample

A retrospective, descriptive study was undertaken, reviewing the medical records of patients who necessitated intervention from the Mental Health Service due to a self-harm attempt (including suicide attempts) when presenting at the emergency department of a tertiary hospital in the community of Castile and León.
Data were collected for the period before and after the COVID-19 pandemic, from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2022. The resultant sample was bifurcated into two cohorts: the pre-pandemic period, encompassing the years 2018 and 2019, and the post-pandemic period, which included the years 2021 and 2022.

2.2. Procedure

All medical records encompassed diagnoses pertinent to self-harm attempts, which included suicide attempts, self-harm, or self-harming gestures. In the hospital data, the terms ‘suicide attempts’ and ‘self-harm gestures’ were used interchangeably. However, for the purposes of this study, we defined them collectively as self-harm attempts. These attempts spanned a broad spectrum of methods, such as drug or alcohol injection or ingestion, chemical ingestion, hanging, drowning, falling from a height (precipitation), weapon use, electrocution, gas inhalation, burns, blows, or an amalgamation of several of these methods. Exclusions were instituted for instances of alcohol and/or drug intoxications that were recreational, unintentional, or accidental.

2.3. Variables

Both quantitative and qualitative variables were included. The quantitative variables comprised age, the number of previous psychiatric admissions, and the number of previous self-harm attempts. The qualitative variables encompassed gender, marital status, reason for consultation, psychiatric history, medication, the intentionality of the act, the method employed, and the patient’s destination following medical care.

2.4. Data Analysis

The data were scrutinized by utilizing the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 27.0. Quantitative variables were delineated as the mean and standard deviation, while qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. The correlation between variables was analyzed employing Student’s t-tests, chi-square tests, and Spearman’s correlations. The threshold for statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

2.5. Ethical Considerations

The anonymity and confidentiality of the subjects throughout the research process were ensured. The research received approval from the ethics committee of the health area to which the hospital belongs (protocol code: 2337), as well as permission from the hospital management. The data were processed in accordance with the Organic Law on Data Protection 7/2021 and the recommendations of the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, revised in 2008.

3. Results

3.1. Sociodemographic Characteristics

From 2018 to 2022, a total of 529 patients were admitted to the emergency department due to self-harm attempts. Of these, 36.3% (n = 192) were male, 62.8% (n = 332) were female, and 0.9% (n = 5) identified as non-binary. The mean age of the individuals was 42.74 (±18.88; max. 96, min. 11). The analysis of the age groups revealed that the largest proportion of individuals fell within the 41–50 age range (n = 130; 24.6%). Table 1 presents the descriptive data for the pre- and post-pandemic periods, as well as the association between them. In 2018, a total of 101 patients with a self-harm attempt diagnosis attended the emergency department. This number decreased to 84 in 2019, and in 2020, 82 cases were recorded. In both 2021 and 2022, 131 individuals attended each year. Statistically significant differences were observed in the number of cases between the two periods, with an increase in the post-pandemic period (t (446) = 68.01, p = 0.0001). Table 2 presents the correlation analyses between age, previous self-harm attempts, and previous admissions to psychiatry. The analysis revealed a negative and significant correlation between age and self-harm attempts. Research has shown a negative correlation between age and self-harm attempts, while previous self-harm attempts were positively correlated with previous admissions to psychiatric units (Table 1).

3.2. Previous Psychiatric History and Treatment

Table 3 presents the psychiatric history and treatment profiles of the patients. In the post-pandemic period, there was a significant increase in the correlation between self-harm attempts and a history of mental health problems (χ2(19) = 38.315, p = 0.005), particularly anxiety and depression (increased from 13.5% to 16.8%) and in patients diagnosed with multiple psychiatric conditions (increased from 15.1% to 27.5%). In terms of treatment, the post-pandemic period saw a notable increase in the number of patients prescribed psychiatric medication (χ2(8) = 15.419, p = 0.031). Furthermore, there was a growth in the percentage of patients on multiple medications (from 49.2% to 58.4%) and in the use of anxiolytics (from 8.1% to 12.2%).

3.3. Characteristics of Self-Harm Attempts

In terms of the intentionality of the act, 78.8% (n = 417) of individuals expressed a desire to end their own lives, while 11.2% (n = 59) refuted any such intention, and 10% (n = 53) were uncertain about their intent. Table 4 outlines the specifics of the self-harm attempts. The most commonly used method was drug ingestion, followed by sharp force trauma. The majority of the patients were able to return home. It is important to note that 63.5% of the cases had not attempted autolysis previously, and almost all (90.7%) had not been admitted to psychiatric care before. The fatality rate was only 0.6%. Notably, there were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics associated with self-harm attempts between the pre-pandemic and post-pandemic periods.

4. Discussion

Presently, there are concerns about estimating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mental health of the population [10,11,22]. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a severe impact on the mental health of the population. Social isolation and disruptions in health services may have contributed to an increased risk of suicidal ideation during the pandemic, leading to higher rates of suicide and mental illness [30]. This study aimed to address this issue by describing and comparing the instances and characteristics of self-harm attempts before and after the COVID-19 pandemic in an emergency department. The findings suggest a significant rise in the number of self-harm attempts in the post-pandemic period compared to the pre-pandemic period. These results are in contrast with another study that reported a decrease in the number of self-harm attempts in an emergency department post-pandemic, with most of the individuals being single and older [29]. Mongodi et al. reported an increase in the number of admissions to ICUs due to self-harm post-pandemic [31]. Another study reported a 38.5% increase in suicide attempts post-pandemic, but this increase was not statistically significant due to the short duration of the analysis period [32]. It is crucial to consider factors such as conflict, domestic violence, economic loss, anxiety and depression, or pre-existing mental disorders to prevent suicide attempts [28]. Yan et al. (2021) carried out a meta-analysis and discovered a significant surge in suicide ideation and attempts during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the rates of suicide deaths have remained stable [33]; these results align with our findings. Moreover, individuals who were infected with COVID-19 reported an increase in suicidal thoughts and risk behaviors [34]. In the context of the pandemic, dissatisfaction with close relationships and housing emerged as the most significant predictors of suicidal ideation, surpassing the economic situation. Machine learning techniques can be employed to identify the presence of suicidal ideation [35].
In prior research, a gender disparity has been observed in the frequency of self-harm attempts, with women reporting a higher number of attempts than men [5,6,9,22,25,26,36]. No correlation was identified between relationship status and drug use across the two periods under study, although such a relationship is evident in the context of psychiatric history and treatment. Current evidence suggests that confinement in isolation and uncertainty can have negative consequences, leading to an increase in mental health problems such as anxiety and depression [9,11,19,20,25]. In contrast, a study conducted in the Czech Republic found that the happiness and quality of life of individuals during the peak of the pandemic was higher than that measured one year before the pandemic. This could be due to the fact that they were in an adequate health state during a period of uncertainty and global health emergency [37]. In this study, we observed an increase in both pathologies in post-pandemic patients, as well as an increase in the number of people with multiple pathologies.
In line with previous studies, there was an increase in the number of individuals on multiple medications post-confinement, accompanied by an increased consumption of anxiolytics [5,10,22]. Drug ingestion emerged as the predominant method of self-harm, consistent with other studies [38]. Of the total self-harm attempts, 0.6% resulted in fatalities due to complications. One potential repercussion of COVID-19 is the detrimental impact it can have on individuals who have lost a loved one, potentially leading to heightened suicidal ideation, complicated grief, and depression. It is noteworthy that these effects have been documented in studies such as the one referenced in [39]. Although recent official data at the Spanish level are lacking, a study conducted in Spain suggests that consultations for suicidal ideation and attempts have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the previous two years [40]. Additionally, there has been an increase in suicidal ideation and attempts following home confinement [40], which is consistent with our results.
Finally, it is worth noting that the age range with the greatest increase in self-harm attempts after the pandemic was 41 to 50 years. These data are comparable to those reported by Kim et al. In their study, the highest number of self-harm attempts occurred in the 40–49 age group, followed by the 50–59 age group, which had the highest percentage of suicide deaths [41]. However, a study conducted in India indicates that the highest number of self-harm attempts occur among women and individuals aged 18–29 years old [42]. Similar to another study conducted in an emergency department in Ethiopia, the most frequent age range was found to be between 28 and 37 [43]. However, a study conducted in Taiwan suggests an increased risk of suicide in vulnerable groups, including those under 25 and over 65 years of age [44]. There has also been a significant rise in attempts among adolescents aged 10 to 20 years. This evidence underscores the vulnerability of adolescents during confinement and exclusionary situations, as well as the psychological adaptation challenges they face during these times [11,19,26]. A study conducted in the United States revealed that in the months following the pandemic, there was a substantial increase in calls to poison control centers due to suicidal intentions in adolescents, resulting in a 44% increase in fatalities [45]. Another study carried out in Korea reported a 2.2% increase in suicide attempts among adolescents. This was partly related to economic stress and feelings of loneliness [46]. Therefore, it is important to understand the level of life satisfaction among young people and the factors that can impact their well-being [47].
This study has limitations. Although the sample size is considerable, it only includes individuals seeking care in the emergency department, which does not represent the entire population of those who may have attempted self-harm. Additionally, the results cannot be generalized due to the geographical limitation. Furthermore, the retrospective approach of this study prevents obtaining detailed information on the underlying motives that led the subjects to attempt suicide. It is important to note that we were unable to follow up with patients after their stay in the emergency department.

5. Conclusions

Three years after the COVID-19 lockdown, it is evident that the pandemic has had a significant impact on the mental health of the population, both directly and indirectly. The increase in self-harm attempts following the pandemic highlights the need for prevention plans and patient follow-up in cases of psychological and emotional vulnerability.
Risk factors for self-harm attempts have been observed in individuals with certain characteristics. These include female gender, 10–20 and 41–50 age groups, a history of psychiatric disorders (particularly multipathological disorders such as anxiety and depression), being on multiple medications (especially antidepressants and anxiolytics), and previous admissions to psychiatric units. The number of attempted suicide cases increased by 14.5% in the post-pandemic stage compared to the pre-pandemic period.
Therefore, it is crucial to monitor and identify high-risk patients in emergency departments. It is also essential to assess the impact of the pandemic on mental health and implement prevention and early detection programs for at-risk situations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.F.-M., M.Q.-P. and A.B.-M.; methodology, E.F.-M., A.B.-M., M.C.M.-F. and M.Q.-P.; software, E.F.-M. and M.C.M.-F.; validation, E.F.-M., A.B.-M., M.C.M.-F. and M.Q.-P.; formal analysis, E.F.-M. and A.B.-M.; investigation, E.F.-M., A.B.-M. and M.Q.-P.; resources, M.C.M.-F.; data curation, M.C.M.-F.; writing—original draft preparation, E.F.-M., A.B.-M. and M.Q.-P.; writing—review and editing, E.F.-M. and M.C.M.-F.; visualization, E.F.-M., A.B.-M., M.C.M.-F. and M.Q.-P.; supervision, E.F.-M. and M.Q.-P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee for Medicinal Research of the Health Regions of León and Bierzo (protocol code: 2337 and date of approval: 28 March 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Consent was waived due to Retrospective study of medical records, access to the data was made possible by a favourable report from the ethics committee.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. I Nforme Mundial Sobre Salud Mental: Transformar La Salud Mental Para Todos; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  2. Observatorio de Biopolítica Informe Del Suicidio En España: Actualización 2023. Available online: https://biopolitica.net/2022/09/09/informe-del-suicidio-en-espana-actualizacion-2023/ (accessed on 4 November 2023).
  3. Soler, A.M.; Sanchez, L.M.; Monseny, A.M.; de la Maza, V.T.S.; González, M.D.P.; Cabeza, F.V.; Cubells, C.L. Características Epidemiológicas de Las Tentativas de Suicidio En Adolescentes Atendidos En Urgencias. An. Pediatr. 2016, 85, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística). La Salud Mental En La Pandemia. Available online: https://www.ine.es/ss/Satellite?L=es_ES&c=INECifrasINE_C&cid=1259953225445&p=1254735116567&pagename=ProductosYServicios%2FPYSLayout (accessed on 4 November 2023).
  5. Bello, M.A.R.; Teruel, D.S. Variables Demográficas Que Predicen El Intento de Suicidio En Población Local Española. Arch. Med. 2020, 20, 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  6. Habu, H.; Takao, S.; Fujimoto, R.; Naito, H.; Nakao, A.; Yorifuji, T. Emergency Dispatches for Suicide Attempts during the COVID-19 Outbreak in Okayama, Japan: A Descriptive Epidemiological Study. J. Epidemiol. 2021, 31, 511–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bostwick, J.M.; Pabbati, C.; Geske, J.R.; McKean, A.J. Suicide Attempt as a Risk Factor for Completed Suicide: Even More Lethal than We Knew. Am. J. Psychiatry 2016, 173, 1094–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Keefner, T.P.; Stenvig, T. Suicidality: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2020, 42, 227–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Taron, M.; Nunes, C.; Maia, T. Suicide and Suicide Attempts in Adults: Exploring Suicide Risk 24 Months after a Psychiatric Emergency Room Visit. Braz. J. Psychiatry 2020, 42, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shin, J.; Yang, S.; Park, D.-H.; Ryu, S.-H.; Ha, J.H.; Kim, J.W.; Jeon, H.J. Predictors of Psychiatric Outpatient Adherence after an Emergency Room Visit for a Suicide Attempt. Psychiatry Investig. 2020, 17, 896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abrial, E.; Chalancon, B.; Leaune, E.; Brunelin, J.; Wallon, M.; Moll, F.; Barakat, N.; Hoestlandt, B.; Fourier, A.; Simon, L. Investigating Predictive Factors of Suicidal Re-Attempts in Adolescents and Young Adults after a First Suicide Attempt, a Prospective Cohort Study. Study Protocol of the SURAYA Project. Front. Psychiatry 2022, 13, 916640. [Google Scholar]
  12. Motillon-Toudic, C.; Walter, M.; Séguin, M.; Carrier, J.-D.; Berrouiguet, S.; Lemey, C. Social Isolation and Suicide Risk: Literature Review and Perspectives. Eur. Psychiatry 2022, 65, e65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sharma, P. Impact of Education on Suicides in India. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2022, 13, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Villahoz, L.B.; Sanz, M.T.R.; Carpio, C.F.; García, C.A.C.; Alhambra, R.D.; Usaola, C.P. El Papel de Los Factores Precipitantes, Los Estresores y La Violencia En La Conducta e Ideación Suicida: Diferencias En Función Del Motivo de Consulta y El Sexo. Clínica Contemp. 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Health Organization. Live Life: An Implementation Guide for Suicide Prevention in Countries; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Moncloa, L.; Consejo de Ministros. Coronavirus COVID-19. Available online: https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/consejodeministros/resumenes/Paginas/2020/14032020_alarma.aspx (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  17. Junta de Castilla y León Actividades Permitidas En Fase 2. Available online: https://comunicacion.jcyl.es/web/jcyl/Comunicacion/es/Plantilla100Detalle/1284939308625/Documentacion/1284813786017/Comunicacion (accessed on 10 January 2024).
  18. Ministerio de Sanidad Plan Para La Transición Hacia Una Nueva Normalidad. Available online: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/ccayes/alertasActual/nCov-China/planDesescalada.htm (accessed on 28 June 2020).
  19. Longobardi, C.; Morese, R.; Fabris, M.A. COVID-19 Emergency: Social Distancing and Social Exclusion as Risks for Suicide Ideation and Attempts in Adolescents. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 551113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hernández-Calle, D.; Martínez-Alés, G.; Mediavilla, R.; Aguirre, P.; Rodríguez-Vega, B.; Bravo-Ortiz, M.F. Trends in Psychiatric Emergency Department Visits Due to Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Madrid, Spain. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2020, 81, 21721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Kang, J.-H.; Lee, S.-W.; Ji, J.-G.; Yu, J.-K.; Jang, Y.-D.; Kim, S.-J.; Kim, Y.-W. Changes in the Pattern of Suicide Attempters Visiting the Emergency Room after COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Cross Sectional Study. BMC Psychiatry 2021, 21, 571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sànchez, J.G. Intento de Suicidio Antes y Durante La Pandemia de COVID-19. Estudio Comparativo Desde El Servicio de Urgencias. Med. Fam. Semer. 2023, 49, 101922. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kawohl, W.; Nordt, C. COVID-19, Unemployment, and Suicide. Lancet Psychiatry 2020, 7, 389–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Králik, R. The Influence of Family and School in Shaping the Values of Children and Young People in the Theory of Free Time and Pedagogy. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2023, 14, 249–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rajesh, K.; Rao, A.A.; Krishna, D.; Vaishnav, P.P.; Davis, S.; Abhinov, T.; Suresh, A.; Nadig, C.; DGSR, K.M.; Vaishnav, P. Patients with Suicidal Patterns in the Emergency Room: A Clinical and Social Reflection. Cureus 2021, 13, e18570. [Google Scholar]
  26. Yard, E.; Radhakrishnan, L.; Ballesteros, M.F.; Sheppard, M.; Gates, A.; Stein, Z.; Hartnett, K.; Kite-Powell, A.; Rodgers, L.; Adjemian, J. Emergency Department Visits for Suspected Suicide Attempts among Persons Aged 12–25 Years before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic—United States, January 2019–May 2021. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2021, 70, 888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística). Encuesta Europea de Salud en España. Resultados. Available online: https://www.ine.es/dyngs/INEbase/es/operacion.htm?c=Estadistica_C&cid=1254736176784&menu=resultados&idp=1254735573175 (accessed on 20 October 2023).
  28. Pathirathna, M.L.; Nandasena, H.M.R.K.G.; Atapattu, A.M.M.P.; Weerasekara, I. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Suicidal Attempts and Death Rates: A Systematic Review. BMC Psychiatry 2022, 22, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Efgan, M.G.; Çinaroglu, O.S.; Payza, U.; Kanter, E.; Bilgin, S. Comparison of Suicide Attempt Cases Admitted to Emergency Services during COVID-19 and Before. Ann. Clin. Anal. Med. 2023, 14, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sacco, M.A.; Gualtieri, S.; Ricci, P.; Aquila, I. The Risk of Suicide in the Post-COVID-19 Emergency Era: Psychological and Forensic Implications. Cureus 2023, 15, e49081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mongodi, S.; Salve, G.; Ravasi, M.; Rizzi, D.; Mangiagalli, M.; Musella, V.; Klersy, C.; Ansaloni, L.; Mojoli, F. The Mental Health Toll of COVID-19: Significant Increase in Admissions to ICU for Voluntary Self-Inflicted Injuries after the Beginning of the Pandemic. Int. J. Ment. Health Syst. 2023, 17, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chiba, H.; Lewis, M.; Benjamin, E.R.; Jakob, D.A.; Liasidis, P.; Wong, M.D.; Navarrete, S.; Carreon, R.; Demetriades, D. “Safer at Home”: The Effect of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Epidemiology, Resource Utilization, and Outcomes at a Large Urban Trauma Center. J. Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021, 90, 708–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yan, Y.; Hou, J.; Li, Q.; Yu, N.X. Suicide before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Iob, E.; Steptoe, A.; Fancourt, D. Abuse, Self-Harm and Suicidal Ideation in the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Br. J. Psychiatry 2020, 217, 543–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Rus Prelog, P.; Matić, T.; Pregelj, P.; Sadikov, A. A Pilot Predictive Model Based on COVID-19 Data to Assess Suicidal Ideation Indirectly. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2023, 163, 318–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lima, M.J.V.; Rodríguez, C.Á.; Lamas, M.L.-R.; Landeira, A.C.; Álvarez, C.A. Análisis de Los Aspectos Epidemiológicos de Las Tentativas de Suicidio En Un Área Sanitaria Desde La Perspectiva de Un Servicio de Urgencias. Emergencias 2012, 24, 121–125. [Google Scholar]
  37. Petrovič, F.; Murgaš, F.; Králik, R. Happiness in Czechia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability 2021, 13, 10826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Otani, K.; Yoshikawa, R.; Naitou, A.; Fukushima, H.; Matsuishi, K. Characteristics of Suicidal Emergency Room Patients before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan. Neuropsychopharmacol. Rep. 2023, 43, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Drucker, A.; Levi-Belz, Y.; Hamdan, S. Depression, Complicated Grief, and Suicide Ideation Following Bereavement during the COVID-19 Pandemic. OMEGA-J. Death Dying 2023, 00302228231186361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Jerónimo, M.A.; Piñar, S.; Samos, P.; Gonzalez, A.M.; Bellsolà, M.; Sabaté, A.; León, J.; Aliart, X.; Martín, L.M.; Aceña, R.; et al. Suicidal attempt and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to previous years. Rev. Psiquiatr. Salud Ment. 2021, 49, 101922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, H.H.; Lee, J.H.; Song, I.H.; Park, Y.R. Characteristics and Risk Factors of Suicide among People Who Attempted Self-Harm in South Korea: A Longitudinal National Cohort Study in South Korea. Psychiatry Res. 2023, 330, 115613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Singh, S.; Kumar, S.; Deep, R. Patients with Deliberate Self-Harm Attended in Emergency Setting at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A 13-Month Analysis of Clinical-Psychiatric Profile. Int. J. Psychiatry Med. 2019, 54, 363–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Wordefo, D.K.; Kassim, F.M.; Birhanu, E.; Mamo, G. Suicidal Behaviors and Associated Factors among Patients Attending an Emergency Department: A Facility-Based Cross-Sectional Study. BMC Psychiatry 2023, 23, 462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chen, Y.-Y.; Yang, C.-T.; Pinkney, E.; Yip, P.S.F. Suicide Trends Varied by Age-Subgroups during the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 in Taiwan. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2022, 121, 1174–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wang, G.S.; Leonard, J.; Cornell, A.; Hoyte, C. Adolescent US Poison Center Exposure Calls During the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Adolesc. Heal. 2022, 71, 764–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jung, S.-I.; Lee, S.-Y.; Kim, D.-J.; Yang, C.-M. Risk Factors and Trends in Adolescent’s Suicide Attempt Rates Before and after the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2024, 39, e32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kobylarek, A.; Błaszczyński, K.; Ślósarz, L.; Madej, M.; Carmo, A.; Hlad, Ľ.; Králik, R.; Akimjak, A.; Judák, V.; Maturkanič, P. The Quality of Life among University of the Third Age Students in Poland, Ukraine and Belarus. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample.
Total SamplePre-Pandemic (2018–2019)Post-Pandemic (2021–2022)p
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Gender0.620
Male192 (36.3%)66 (35.7%)92 (35.1%)
Female332 (62.8%)118 (63.8%)166 (63.4%)
Non-binary5 (9%)1 (0.5%)4 (1.5%)
Marital Status0.963
Unknown225 (42.5%)83 (44.9%)113 (43.1%)
Single40 (7.6%)12 (6.5%)20 (7.6%)
Couple84 (15.9%)30 (16.2%)41 (15.6%)
Married78 (14.7%)25 (13.5%)40 (15.3%)
Separated85 (16.1%)31 (16.8%)40 (15.3%)
Widowed17 (3.2%)4 (2.2%)8 (3.1%)
Prior Drug Use0.128
No404 (76.4%)134 (72.4%)206 (78.6%)
Yes116 (21.9%)49 (26.5%)50 (19.1%)
Ex-consumer9 (1.7%)2 (1.1%)6 (2.3%)
Table 2. Correlations between age, psychiatric admissions, and previous self-harm attempts.
Table 2. Correlations between age, psychiatric admissions, and previous self-harm attempts.
AgePrevious Self-Harm Attempts
Previous self-harm attemptsCorrelation coefficient−0.100 *
Sig. (bilateral)0.034
Previous admissions to psychiatryCorrelation coefficient−0.0340.329 **
Sig. (bilateral)0.4780.000
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01.
Table 3. Association between history and previous psychiatric treatment.
Table 3. Association between history and previous psychiatric treatment.
Total SamplePre-Pandemic
(2018–2019)		Post-Pandemic
(2021–2022)		p
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Psychiatric history0.005 **
No128 (24.2%)49 (26.5%)56 (21.4%)
Anxiety41 (7.8%)14 (7.6%)18 (6.9%)
Depression73 (13.8%)31 (16.8%)31 (12.2%)
Anxiety and depression85 (16.1%)25 (13.5%)44 (16.8%)
Gender dysphoria3 (0.6%)1 (0.5%)2 (0.8%)
BPD26 (4.9%)15 (8.1%)9 (3.5%)
ADHD5 (0.9%)0 (0%)4 (1.5%)
Adaptive/dissociative identity disorder24 (4.5%)10 (5.4%)13 (5%)
Schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder4 (0.8%)0 (0%)2 (0.8%)
OCD1 (0.2%)0 (0%)1 (0.4%)
Emotional instability/dysthymia/reactive attachment disorder5 (1%)1 (0.5%)2 (0.8%)
Bipolar disorder7 (1.3%)5 (2.7%)1 (0.4%)
Epilepsy5 (0.9%)2 (1.1%)3 (1.1%)
Psychotic disorder5 (0.9%)4 (2.2%)1 (0.4%)
Eating Disorder2 (0.4%)0 (0%)2 (0.8%)
Pluripathological (>2)115 (21.7%)28 (15.1%)72 (27.5%)
Psychiatric treatment0.031 **
No133 (25.1%)63 (34.1%)51 (19.5%)
Polymedication (>2)292 (55.2%)91 (49.2%)153 (58.4%)
Antidepressant37 (7%)14 (7.6%)20 (7.6%)
Anxiolytic58 (10.9%)15 (8.1%)32 (12.2%)
Antipsychotic2 (0.4%)1 (0.5%)1 (0.4%)
Anticonvulsant1 (0.2%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Treatment for ADHD2 (0.4%)0 (0%)2 (0.8%)
Hypnotic2 (0.4%)0 (0%)2 (0.8%)
Antiepileptic2 (0.4%)1 (0.5%)2 (0.8%)
ADHD: attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, BPD: borderline personality disorder, OCD: obsessive–compulsive disorder. ** p < 0.01
Table 4. Characteristics of self-harm attempts.
Table 4. Characteristics of self-harm attempts.
Total SamplePre-Pandemic (2018–2019)Post-Pandemic (2021–2022)p
n (%)n (%)n (%)
Intent of the act0.474
Unknown53 (10%)21 (11.4%)25 (9.5%)
Death417 (78.8%)141 (76.2%)212 (80.9%)
Denies self-intention59 (11.2%)23 (12.4%)25 (9.5%)
Method of self-harm0.149
Various methods36 (6.8%)9 (4.9%)24 (9.2%)
Drug ingestion340 (64.3%)112 (60.5%)174 (66.4%)
Drug injection4 (0.8%)1 (0.5%)2 (0.8%)
Chemical ingestion11 (2.1%)5 (2.7%)6 (2.3%)
Precipitation26 (4.9%)13 (7%)8 (3.1%)
Drowning2 (0.4%)2 (1.1%)0 (0%)
Hanging19 (3.6%)9 (4.9%)6 (2.3%)
Sharp force trauma73 (13.8%)27 (14.6%)33 (12.6%)
Firearm2 (0.4%)0 (0%)2 (0.8%)
Self-harm ideas6 (1.1%)2 (1.1%)3 (1.1%)
Electrocution1 (0.2%)0 (0%)1 (0.4%)
Gas inhalation7 (1.3%)4 (2.2%)2 (0.8%)
Burns1 (0.2%)1 (0.5%)0 (0%)
Beatings1 (0.2%)0 (0%)1 (0.4%)
Patient destination0.478
Admission to psychiatry139 (26.3%)49 (26.5%)66 (25.2%)
Discharge to home353 (66.7%)123 (66.5%)176 (67.2%)
Voluntary discharge25 (4.7%)9 (4.9%)14 (5.3%)
ICU8 (1.5%)1 (0.5%)5 (1.9%)
Runaway4 (0.8%)3 (1.6%)1 (0.4)
Previous self-harm attempts
No336 (63.5%)124 (67%)162 (61.8%)
1110 (20.8%)34 (18.4%)52 (19.8%)
246 (8.7%)13 (7%)27 (10.3%)
328 (5.3%)12 (6.5%)14 (5.3%)
47 (1.3%)2 (1.1%)5 (1.9%)
51 (0.2%)0 (0%)1 (0.4%)
61 (0.2%)0 (0%)1 (0.4%)
Previous psychiatric admissions0.811
No480 (90.7%)169 (91.4%)241 (92%)
Yes49 (9.3%)16 (8.6%)21 (8%)
Deceased after the self-harm attempt0.811
No526 (99.4%)184 (99.5%)260 (99.2%)
Yes3 (0.6%)1 (0.5%)2 (0.8%)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández-Martínez, E.; Barros-Martínez, A.; Martínez-Fernández, M.C.; Quiñones-Pérez, M. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Harm Attempts Observed in a Hospital Emergency Department. Healthcare 2024, 12, 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030385

AMA Style

Fernández-Martínez E, Barros-Martínez A, Martínez-Fernández MC, Quiñones-Pérez M. The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Harm Attempts Observed in a Hospital Emergency Department. Healthcare. 2024; 12(3):385. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030385

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández-Martínez, Elena, Andrea Barros-Martínez, María Cristina Martínez-Fernández, and Marta Quiñones-Pérez. 2024. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Harm Attempts Observed in a Hospital Emergency Department" Healthcare 12, no. 3: 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030385

APA Style

Fernández-Martínez, E., Barros-Martínez, A., Martínez-Fernández, M. C., & Quiñones-Pérez, M. (2024). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Self-Harm Attempts Observed in a Hospital Emergency Department. Healthcare, 12(3), 385. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12030385

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop