Next Article in Journal
Intravesical Instillations of Hyaluronic Acid as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome: Use, Efficacy and Effects on Quality of Life
Next Article in Special Issue
Effectiveness of Treatment Approaches in COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Comparative Evaluation between a Specialized Center and Conventional Hospitals
Previous Article in Journal
What Self-Management Skills Do Turkish Caregivers Have in Caring for People with Dementia? Results of a Qualitative Survey
Previous Article in Special Issue
Korean Hospital Nurses’ Experiences with COVID-19: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Findings
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Using Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) to Compare Premature Mortality between Romanian Counties to Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in 2020 and 2021

by
Diana Maria Rahotă
1,
Dorel Petru Țîrț
2,
Lucia Georgeta Daina
2,
Cristian Marius Daina
3 and
Codrin Dan Nicolae Ilea
4,*
1
Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania
2
Psycho-Neurosciences and Recovery Department, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania
3
Department of Surgical Disciplines, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Oradea, 1 December Sq., 410081 Oradea, Romania
4
Statistics Department, Bihor County Emergency Clinical Hospital, 67 Gheorghe Doja Street, 410169 Oradea, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2024, 12(12), 1189; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12121189
Submission received: 30 April 2024 / Revised: 28 May 2024 / Accepted: 11 June 2024 / Published: 13 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection COVID-19: Impact on Public Health and Healthcare)

Abstract

:
This article examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on potential years of life lost (PYLL) in Romania’s counties in 2020 and 2021. PYLL highlights the burden of premature deaths in a community and is a useful tool for prioritizing community health issues. The study compares the PYLL variation between different counties, identifying disparities in premature mortality rates and highlighting areas that require specific public health interventions. The results indicate that COVID-19 has had a significant impact on potential years of life lost across the country. For the year 2020, the total number of deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases was 19,455, of which 14,152 premature deaths caused 193,489 PYLL, with a crude rate of 1053.28 PYLL per 100,000 inhabitants. In 2021, there were 39,966 deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases, with 28,777 premature deaths, 386,061 PYLL, and a crude rate of 2116.63 PYLL per 100,000 population. This study reveals significant variations only in some counties, based on BYLL rates, and in the two years analyzed. The proportion of premature deaths (<80 years) varied by county and gender. PYLL’s analysis by gender shows that men experienced a higher number of premature deaths than women in most counties, and this trend persisted in both years. The results are presented in the form of thematic maps, highlighting standardized PYLL rates for both genders in each county, facilitating a visual understanding of regional disparities. The identified variations can serve as a basis for developing and implementing more effective public health policies, based on the specifics of each county.

1. Introduction

Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) rates are a useful tool for comparing the burden of specific causes of death between groups and highlighting the burden of premature deaths, which often have the greatest impact on a community [1]. PYLL is calculated by subtracting the age at death from that person’s standard life expectancy. This value helps highlight the years of life that are lost when a person dies prematurely, at the individual or community level, providing valuable information for public health interventions and policies.
Comparing potential years of life lost (PYLL) between counties in Romania is crucial for several reasons. First, it identifies disparities in premature mortality rates, which can highlight areas in need of targeted public health interventions and resource allocation [1]. By comparing PYLL between counties, it becomes possible to discern which regions are facing a higher burden of premature deaths and investigate the causes behind these discrepancies. This is particularly important in a country like Romania, where there are significant regional variations in terms of economic development and access to health services [2]. In addition, comparing PYLL can provide insights into the effectiveness of public health policies and interventions in different counties, helping to identify best practices and areas for improvement. In addition, comparing PYLL between counties in Romania can help in understanding the impact of certain health issues and diseases on different regions. For example, studies have shown variations in the prevalence of mosquito-borne pathogens and zoonotic diseases in different regions of Romania [3,4,5]. By comparing PYLL, it becomes possible to assess the impact of these diseases on premature mortality and prioritize public health measures accordingly. In addition, comparing PYLL between counties can shed light on the social, economic and environmental factors that determine health. Inequalities in access to health services, hygiene and preventive behavior have been documented in different regions of Romania [6,7,8,9]. Comparing PYLL can help understand how these disparities contribute to differences in preterm mortality rates and guide efforts to address these underlying determinants.
The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on Romania, with over 3,305,048 confirmed cases and 67,341 deaths reported by December 2022 [10]. The pandemic has led to various studies focusing on different aspects of the situation in Romania. For example, research has been conducted to understand attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination among cancer patients [11], as well as the reasons for refusing vaccination against COVID-19 in the Romanian population [12]. In addition, the impact of the pandemic on different sectors, such as healthcare and education, has been explored. Studies have investigated the motivation of healthcare professionals and their work interests in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic [10], as well as teachers’ resilience and mindset regarding the use and efficiency of e-learning platforms during the pandemic period [13]. In addition, the economic and social implications of the pandemic have been a topic of interest. The impact of the pandemic on Romania’s economic growth was examined [14], together with an assessment of the SARS-CoV-2 infection rates among dental practitioners and the economic impact on dental practices [15]. In addition, the pandemic has led to a significant number of prematurely lost life years (PYLL) in Romania, with a study reporting 4,210,654 PYLL in 17 countries, including Romania, in August 2020 [16]. In addition, the spread of the COVID-19 virus in Romania was analyzed, with studies focusing on the early spread of the virus, cases imported from other countries and human-to-human transmission networks [17]. The impact of the pandemic on different regions in Romania has also been investigated, such as the introduction and characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 in the North-East region during the first COVID-19 outbreak [18]. Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic has had multiple effects on Romania, ranging from changing attitudes towards healthcare and vaccination to economic and social implications. The research conducted provides valuable insights into the different dimensions of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the country.
The literature mainly contains information on the entire country and no articles presenting comparative aspects of the variation in PYLL between the territorial administrative units of Romania (counties and Bucharest Municipality) during the different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic have been identified.
In Romania, according to official data [19,20], 636,201 cases of people infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus were confirmed in 2020, and cumulatively in 2020 and 2021, 1,810,342 cases of infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus were registered. As of January 1, 2022, 58,779 people diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection have died [20]. In Romania, in relation to the epidemiological situation, in order to prevent the spread of COVID-19 and manage its consequences [21], the authorities ordered the state of emergency (from 16 March 2020) and subsequently the state of alert (which, after several extensions, ended on 8 March 2022). The pandemic has had profound consequences on social life (through restrictions and containment measures) and on the health system (application of measures to prevent the spread of the disease, diagnosis and treatment of suspected and confirmed persons). During 2020 and 2021, Romania was affected by pandemic waves and registered, in certain periods, values for the number of daily confirmed cases per 1 million inhabitants higher than those in the European Union [22].
Even though there is controversy about the limitations of PYLL use [23,24], such as recording deaths with a particular cause, setting the norm for which the PYLL is zero, interpreting results, focusing on deaths, and ignoring quality of life, several ways of calculating BYL are described in the literature. The first modality is based on ‘life table norms for life years lost, which is the number of years lost by an ‘average’ person in a given population’ [25]. The second modality is to calculate the difference between the potential life limit and the age at death of the individual [26]. The sum of the years of life lost by each individual within a community is the total PYLL in that community (city, county, country). There is also the possibility of adjusting the PYLL by excluding it from the calculation cases with certain associated comorbidities [25,27]. For the comparability of data, ‘transparency in documenting the exact method used to calculate YLL’ [24] must be ensured, despite all existing and identifiable limitations.
According to the OECD and the European Commission, the life expectancy at birth in Romania in 2019 was 75.6 years, and in 2020 it decreased to 74.2 years [28]. According to WHO/EURO, the life expectancy at birth in 2018 in Romania was 75.4 years (both genders), 79.1 years for women and 71.8 years for men [29]. Based on these data, the age limit for calculating PYLL for confirmed COVID-19 cases could be set at 75 years. In the literature on PYLL for COVID-19 deaths, it is recommended that the limit for premature death is set at 80 years [16,30]. For calculating the PYLL for comparability with international studies, in this study, we used the age limit of 80 years for premature deaths.
The aim of the study is to investigate the variation in Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) caused by COVID-19 in Romanian counties in 2020 and 2021. This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the impact of COVID-19 deaths on potential years of life lost in each county of the country. For each year studied, we will calculate the PYLL indicators: proportion of premature deaths out of total deaths in confirmed COVID-19 cases, number for deaths for each gender and the total for both genders by county, the crude rate of PYLL for each gender and the total for both genders by county, PYLL/death for each gender and the total for both genders by county, and the standardized rate of PYLL for both genders. The research was conducted using the model of a retrospectively descriptive epidemiological study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

We conducted a retrospective descriptive observational epidemiological study of the deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases in Romania and registered it in the Alerte.MS platform (national database). The analyzed deaths were registered between March 2020 and 21 April 2022. The data were used by researchers in an anonymized form.

2.2. Data Sources

Anonymized data on COVID-19 deaths at patient level were extracted from the Alerte.MS platform, which allows patient data to be exported from the Corona Forms platform. According to the legislation in force, the Corona Forms software application (version 4.3) is used by the Romanian Ministry of Health in order to “collect and correlate data provided by public authorities and institutions involved in monitoring SARS-CoV-2 virus infection, as well as to record confirmed persons and deaths produced by SARS-CoV-2 virus infection” [31]. For each death registered in the platform, the following fields were exported to an Excel database: age, gender, county of residence, county of infection, year of confirmation, date and time of confirmation, date and time of death, and healthcare-associated infection. The database of deaths registered in 2020, 2021 and 2022 (until 21 April 2022, according to Figure 1) included 65,406 cases, from which cases not mentioned in the county of infection (29 cases) and deaths registered in confirmed cases in 2022 (5956 cases) were excluded. Finally, confirmed cases in 2020 and 2021 (59,421 cases of death) were analyzed.
The numerical data on the resident population on 1 July 2020 and 1 July 2021 (for the 41 counties and Bucharest, Romania) in total and by 5-year age groups were obtained from the platform of the National Institute of Statistics of Romania [32].
The carrying out of this study was approved by the management of the Bihor Public Health Directorate, according to the document registered with the institution with no. 3937/19.03.2024.

2.3. Calculation of Indicators

Microsoft Excel was used to calculate the PYLL indicators. Premature deaths were considered those before the age of 80. From the death database, each death was assigned to the age group of 5 years corresponding to the age at death. For each death, the PYLL number was obtained by subtracting the age limit set (80 years) from the age limit at death.
Subsequently, for each county of Romania and Bucharest for each studied year (2020 and 2021), the total and by gender, the crude rate of PYLL and PYLL/death from confirmed COVID-19 cases were calculated.
The crude rate of PYLL was calculated according to the following formula:
Crude   rate   of   PYLL = PYLL Number   of   population < 80   years × 100.000
Obtaining PYLL/death was achieved by dividing PYLL by the number of deaths that determined the respective potential years of life lost.
For calculating the standardized rate of PYLL for both genders and each county, we used direct standardization based on five-year age groups (0–4, 5–9, ...., 75–79) and the European population as the standard population [33].
Data processing and analysis were carried out with Microsoft Excel, starting from the anonymized database. The thematic map representation of standardized rates was performed with QGIS Desktop version 3.28.5 [34].
Statistical analysis was performed using the R program, version 4.3.3 [35]. The chi-squared test was used to compare categorial data, and the t-test was used to compare continuous variables.

3. Results

The number of deaths and PYLL indicators by Romanian counties in both genders are presented in Table 1 (for 2020) and Table 2 (for 2021).
The comparison of PYLL/death in 2020 versus 2021 shows an increase for the following counties: Bacau, Bistrita-Nasaud, Braila, Caras-Severin, Cluj, Constanta, Covasna, Galati, Gorj, Harghita, Ialomiţa, Maramureş, Satu Mare and Timiş. Statistical significance is recorded only for Covasna County (from 10.28 in 2020 to 14.03 in 2021, test t, p < 0.0001) and Galați County (from 12.51 in 2020 to 14.01 in 2021, test t, p < 0.05). For most counties, as well as nationally, a downward trend in PYLL/death was observed in 2021 compared to 2020. Statistical significance was found in the counties of Arges, Buzău, Teleorman (test t, p < 0.05) and at national level (decrease from 13.67 in 2020 to 13.42 in 2021, test t, p < 0.05).
The proportion of premature deaths in total deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases, for both genders, for each of the analyzed years, namely 2020 and 2021, is shown in Figure 2.
The proportion of premature deaths (<80 years) from confirmed COVID-19 cases per county/Bucharest municipality for both genders in the two analyzed years is presented in Figure 3 (2020) and Figure 4 (2021).
The PYLL indicators by gender (number of premature deaths, total PYLL count, crudePYLL rate per 100,000 population and PYLL/death) are presented in Table 3 (year 2020) and Table 4 (year 2021).
The comparison of PYLL/death for female versus male shows that there is, at the national level, a statistically significant difference of over one year/death for men, both in 2020 (Table 3) and 2021 (Table 4).
The standardised rates of PYLL for both genders by county are presented in map form for each of the years analyzed, namely 2020 (Figure 5) and 2021 (Figure 6).
The contribution of large age groups to premature mortality as a proportion of total premature mortality is shown in Figure 7 (number of premature deaths) and Figure 8 (PYLL).
In both years analyzed, the highest proportion of premature deaths in the 65–79 age group (66% in 2020 and 67% in 2021) is noted, while from the PYLL perspective, the 40–64 age group is the most affected (55% in 2020 and 54% in 2021).

4. Discussion

COVID-19 has resulted in a potentially significant years of life lost (PYLL) in various countries. In 2020, the PYLL per death rate ranged from 2.7 years in Australia to 19.3 years in Ukraine [16]. In Portugal, COVID-19 accounted for 4.2% of all years of life lost, with an exceedance of 35,510 Years of Life Lost (YLL or PYLL); of this, 72% was caused by COVID-19 and 28% by non-COVID-19 causes [36]. According to a study from Czechia (2022), complete vaccination reduced the number of potential life years lost to death by approximately 3.5 times compared to the number of expected deaths between October and December 2021 [37]. A study conducted in 34 countries found that COVID-19 caused 9 to 21 years of life lost per deceased patient, with East Asia and Oceania having fewer YLL per capita than North America and Europe [38]. In Turkey, men had 205,177 potential life years lost and women had 125,330 years lost due to COVID-19 in the first year of the pandemic [39]. In Hungary, the years of life lost to COVID-19 were shorter than expected when comorbidities were considered. The usual calculation shows 10.5 years of life lost for each death, which drops to 9.2 years per death after adjusting for comorbidities. But further research is needed to interpret this finding [25]. Another study (2022) conducted in 20 countries found that the burden of premature mortality from COVID-19 extends beyond older age groups, with some countries experiencing a high burden in younger groups [40]. These variations in PYLL highlight the need to protect vulnerable populations, especially older people, through careful public health measures [38]. Romania has experienced (from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic until 1 November 2020) a significant gender difference in the impact of the disease, with an average age higher than the age of death for women who died of COVID-19, leading to a decrease in the female mortality rate per death (18.84 for males and 23.12 for females). In addition, there were more male than female deaths in absolute numbers [41].
The data provided present information on the deaths and PYLL indicators (Potential years of life lost) related to confirmed COVID-19 cases in Romania for the years 2020 and 2021. The tables provide a breakdown by county, for the number of deaths, the number of premature deaths, the proportion of premature deaths in confirmed COVID-19 cases, PYLL, the crude rate of PYLL (total and by gender), the standardized rate of PYLL (both genders) and PYLL per death (total and by gender).
In 2020, a total of 19,455 deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases were recorded in Romania, with 14,152 premature deaths, resulting in a PYLL of 193,489 and a PYLL per death ratio of 13.67 (Table 1). Our study determined that the range of PYLL/death variation in Romanian counties in 2020 spans from 10.28 years (Covasna County) to 16.08 years (Ilfov County). A study carried out in 17 countries for the period January–August 2020 [16] showed that the PYLL/death from confirmed COVID-19 cases ranged from 19.3 years (Ukraine) to 2.7 years (Australia), with countries with higher values (e.g., Peru—15.2 years, Colombia 14.9 years, Cape Verde 14.7 years, etc.) compared to the lower values recorded in other countries (e.g., Slovenia—2,8 years, Sweden 3.2 years, Norway 4.0 years, France 4.8 years, Georgia 6.2 years); these results refer to different periods since the first case occurred in each country, and do not cover the entire year of 2020 but use 80 years as the age limit for the PYLL calculation.
In 2021, the total number of deaths rose to 39,966, with 28,777 premature deaths, leading to a higher PYLL of 386,061. The PYLL per death ratio remained relatively constant at 13.42 (Table 2). The variation in PYLL/death in the counties of Romania in 2021, calculated according to our study, is between 11.83 years (Cluj County) and 15.03 (Ilfov County).
In confirmed COVID-19 cases, the proportion of premature deaths was relatively constant in the analyzed years (72.74% in 2020 and 72.00% in 2021); there was an increase in the number of premature deaths by 103.3% in 2021 compared to 2020, and the number of PYLL increased by 99.52% in 2021 compared to 2020 (Table 1 and Table 2).
The proportion of premature deaths (<80 years) to confirmed COVID-19 cases in Romania was 72.74% (in 2020) and 72.74% (in 2021), with the counties varying between 61.27% (Cluj County) and 84.45% (Olt County) in 2020, respectively, and between 65.71% (Cluj County) and 79.62% (Maramureș County) in 2021 (Figure 2). The percentage differences observed between 2020 and 2021 are statistically significant in three counties: Hunedoara, Olt and Prahova (p < 0.05). For the rest of the counties, the difference is not statistically significant. The male gender is the most affected by premature mortality at the national and county level, except for some counties in 2021 where the proportion of female deaths was higher in women (Satu Mare, Salaj, Calarasi, Alba), according to Figure 3 and Figure 4.
In 2020, the crude rate of PYLL for both genders recorded the highest value in Bihor County (1698.49/100,000 inhabitants) and the lowest in Giurgiu County (308.5/100,000 inhabitants), the other counties being between the two extreme values (Table 1). In the same year, the crude PYLL rate by gender ranged between 1325.16/100,000 inhabitants (Bihor County) and 228.90/100,000 inhabitants (Giurgiu County), and ranged between 2215.13/100,000 inhabitants (Sibiu County) and 385.15/100,000 inhabitants (Giurgiu County) for males, as shown in Table 3. There is a statistically significant difference between men and women at the national level in 2020 regarding the analyzed indicators, with a predominant impact on males.
In 2021, the crude rate of PYLL, for both genders, recorded the highest value in Caraș-Severin County (3553.65/100,000 inhabitants) and the lowest in Ilfov County (1365.12/100,000 inhabitants), the other counties being between the two extreme values (Table 2). In the same year, the crude PYLL rate by gender was between 3761.77/100,000 inhabitants (Caraș-Severin county) and 1606.38/100,000 inhabitants (Ilfov county), and between 3350.2/100,000 inhabitants (Caraș-Severin county) and 1130.94/100,000 inhabitants (Ilfov county), as shown in Table 4. There is a significant difference between men and women at the national level in 2021 regarding the analyzed indicators, with a greater impact on males.
The standardized rates of PYLL for both genders, which eliminate differences in the population distribution by age group, and their representation in map form provide a visual representation of the geographical distribution of the impact of COVID-19 deaths (Figure 5 and Figure 6). For each year analyzed, counties can be ranked by the impact caused by years of life lost to confirmed COVID-19 cases and the increase in the standardized rate of PYLL recorded in 2020 and 2021 in all counties. These increases may show an intensification of the impact of the pandemic in the second year, a higher detection rate and/or a lower effectiveness of control and prevention measures. The counties that saw the highest increase in the standardized PYLL rate in 2021 compared to 2020 were Giurgiu (5.89-fold increase), Satu Mare (4.37-fold increase), Dolj (3.56-fold increase) and Covasna (3.38-fold), and the counties with the lowest increases were Mures (1.53-fold increase), Suceava (1.42-fold increase) and Arges (1.21-fold increase). The age-standardized rates of PYLL (per 100,000 inhabitants) for confirmed cases of COVID-19 varied, in 2020 for Romanian counties, between 301 (Giurgiu County) and 1696 (Bihor County), and in 2021, between 1382 (Buzau County) and 3251 (Bihor County).
According to the study carried out in 17 countries up to week 35 in 2020 [16], the age-standardized rates of PYLL (per 100,000 inhabitants) in confirmed cases of COVID-19 ranged from 1377.0 (Peru) to 2.0 (Georgia); some countries had high values (e.g., Brazil—678.0, Colombia—567.0, USA—343.0) and others had low values (e.g., Norway—24.0, Slovenia—9.0, Cyprus—17.0).
Across all counties of Romania, the burden of premature mortality in confirmed cases of COVID-19 in 2021 was higher compared to 2020. This increase, as reflected by the rise in the total PYLL and the standardised rate of PYLL, occurred in the face of two pandemic waves in each analyzed year. The magnitude of this increase, varying from one county to another, underlines the complex interaction between the population’s vulnerability (which was higher after the first year of the pandemic) and the factors that came into play in the second year, such as the continuation of social restrictions (despite the possibility of limited social activity), limited access to curative and preventive health services, and the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 virus mutations.

Study Limitations

The impossibility of establishing the county of infection for the 29 deaths out of the 65,406 analyzed (Figure 2) is one of the limitations of this study, but it has a minimal impact considering the 59,421 cases analyzed to calculate PYLL. Another possible limitation to the registration of deaths due to COVID-19 was determined by the variable testing capacity from one county to another: counties that developed testing laboratories as early as possible at the beginning of the pandemic benefited from the optimal diagnosis of infection cases and consequently the correct registration of the cause of death.
This study analyzes deaths and PYLL by calendar year without considering the four waves of the COVID-19 pandemic (the first two waves in 2020 and the third and fourth waves in 2021) that affected Romania [42,43]. Also, age matching was not used in the statistical analysis.
This study’s threshold for calculating PYLL (80 years) was chosen because some authors [16,30] consider it more reliable in the case of deaths caused by COVID-19 (even though life expectancy at birth in Romania is lower than this limit) and because it allows comparison with international data. This study did not consider the impact of comorbidities and vaccination on deaths in people infected with COVID-19, nor the economic impact of premature deaths, expressed in PYLL, in the population studied.

5. Conclusions

In 2021, Romania recorded a marked increase in the total number of deaths and premature deaths caused by COVID-19. With a 2.03-fold increase in the number of premature deaths compared to the previous year, the country also saw a 1.99-fold increase in Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL). Despite the increase in deaths and PYLL in 2021, the PYLL per death ratio remained relatively constant at (13.42 in 2021 vs. 13.67 in 2020). This suggests consistency in the average lifespan lost for each COVID-19 death.
The analyzed data indicate that the male gender is more affected by premature mortality nationally and in most counties, except for specific situations in 2021.
The analysis of crude and standardized rates of PYLL across both genders reveals significant variations between counties. Most regions saw significant increases in the standardized rate of PYLL in 2021 compared to 2020 in confirmed COVID-19 cases. These variations can be influenced by the different pandemic management strategies, available resources, and demographic peculiarities of each county.
Overall, the data provided and analyzed in this article provide a complex picture of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Romania, highlighting the need for effective management strategies adapted to the specifics of each county to reduce the fatality of cases and consequently the potential years of life lost.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D. and C.M.D.; methodology, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D. and C.M.D.; software, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D., C.M.D. and C.D.N.I.; validation, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D. and C.M.D.; formal analysis, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D., C.M.D. and C.D.N.I.; investigation, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D. and C.M.D.; resources, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D. and C.M.D.; data curation, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D. and C.M.D.; writing—original draft preparation, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D. and C.M.D.; writing—review and editing, D.M.R., D.P.Ț., L.G.D., C.M.D. and C.D.N.I. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Bihor Public Health Directorate (no. 3937, 19 March 2024).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Rosenberg, M.; Ranapurwala, S.; Townes, A.; Bengtson, A. Do black lives matter in public health research and training? PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Csata, A. Analysis of Accessing Rural Development Funds. Acta Univ. Sapientiae Econ. Bus. 2018, 6, 113–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kalmár, Z.; Dumitrache, M.O.; D’Amico, G.; Matei, I.A.; Ionică, A.M.; Gherman, C.M.; Lupșe, M.; Mihalca, A.D. Multiple Tick-Borne Pathogens in Ixodes ricinus Ticks Collected from Humans in Romania. Pathogens 2020, 9, 390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Giubega, S.; Ilie, M.S.; Luca, I.; Florea, T.; Dreghiciu, C.; Oprescu, I.; Morariu, S.; Dărăbuș, G. Seroprevalence of Anti-Theileria equi Antibodies in Horses from Three Geographically Distinct Areas of Romania. Pathogens 2022, 11, 669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Borṣan, S.; Ionică, A.; Galon, C.; Toma-Naic, A.; Pestean, C.; Sándor, A.; Mihalca, A. High diversity, prevalence, and co-infection rates of tick-borne pathogens in ticks and wildlife hosts in an urban area in Romania. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 645002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mihai, F.C. Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Romania’s Rural Population Access to Sanitation Services in the Context of EU Accession, [Internet]. SocArXiv. 2016. Available online: https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/bm9g7 (accessed on 30 January 2024).
  7. Iurcov, R.; Pop, L.M.; Ciavoi, G.; Iorga, M. Evaluating the Practice of Preventive Behaviors and the Fear of COVID-19 among Dentists in Oradea Metropolitan Area after the First Wave of Pandemic; a Cross-Sectional Study. Healthcare 2021, 9, 443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kalmár, Z.; Briciu, V.; Coroian, M.; Flonta, M.; Rădulescu, A.-L.; Topan, A.; Mihalca, A.D.; Lupșe, M. Seroprevalence of antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato in healthy blood donors in Romania: An update. Parasites Vectors 2021, 14, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Codreanu, C.; Popescu, C.; Mogoșan, C. Area of Residence and Socioeconomic Factors Reduce Access to Biologics for Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Romania. BioMed Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7458361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ilea, C.D.N.; Daina, M.D.; Venter, A.C.; Șuteu, C.L.; Sabău, M.; Badau, D.; Daina, L.G. The Motivation of Medical Staff and the Work Interestedness in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic, in a Tertiary Hospital in Romania. Healthcare 2023, 11, 813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lazar, R.; Oprean, C.; Badau, L.; Miron, G.; Draganescu, L.; Torok-Vistai, T.; Coroian, I.; Sabau, D.; Iliescu, A.; Tamas, L.A.; et al. Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer: A cross-sectional study of 12 oncology centers. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 17, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mărcău, F.C.; Purec, S.; Niculescu, G. Study on the Refusal of Vaccination against COVID-19 in Romania. Vaccines 2022, 10, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mitrea, G. Resilience and Mentalities of Teachers from Romania Regarding the Usage and Efficiency of the E-Learning. Logos Universality Ment. Educ. Nov. Soc. Sci. 2022, 11, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Popa, C.E. The impact of the first year of covid-19 pandemic on Romania’s economic growth. Rev. Econ. J. 2021, 73, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lucaciu, O.; Boca, A.; Mesaros, A.S.; Petrescu, N.; Aghiorghiesei, O.; Mirica, I.C.; Hosu, I.; Armencea, G.; Bran, S.; Dinu, C.M. Assessing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Rate among Romanian Dental Practitioners. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Ugarte, M.P.; Achilleos, S.; Quattrocchi, A.; Gabel, J.; Kolokotroni, O.; Constantinou, C.; Nicolaou, N.; Rodriguez-Llanes, J.M.; Huang, Q.; Verstiuk, O.; et al. Premature Mortality Attributable to COVID-19: Potential Years of Life Lost in 17 Countries around the World, January-August 2020. BMC Public Health 2022, 22, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hâncean, M.-G.; Perc, M.; Lerner, J. Early Spread of COVID-19 in Romania: Imported Cases from Italy and Human-to-Human Transmission Networks. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2020, 7, 200780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lobiuc, A.; Dimian, M.; Gheorghita, R.; Sturdza, O.A.C.; Covasa, M. Introduction and Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 in North-East of Romania during the First COVID-19 Outbreak. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 654417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Buletin de Presă 1 Ianuarie 2021, ora 13.00. Available online: https://covid19.stirioficiale.ro/informatii/buletin-de-presa-1-ianuarie-2021-ora-13-00 (accessed on 12 October 2023).
  20. Buletin de Presă 1 Ianuarie 2022, ora 13.00. COVID-19 Știri Oficiale n.d. Available online: https://covid19.stirioficiale.ro/informatii/buletin-de-presa-1-ianuarie-2022-ora-13-00 (accessed on 12 October 2023).
  21. Decret 195 16/03/2020—Portal Legislativ. n.d. Available online: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocumentAfis/223831 (accessed on 12 October 2023).
  22. Mathieu, E.; Ritchie, H.; Rodés-Guirao, L.; Appel, C.; Giattino, C.; Hasell, J.; Macdonald, B.; Dattani, S.; Beltekian, D.; Ortiz-Ospina, E.; et al. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Published online at OurWorldInData.org. 2020. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus (accessed on 21 February 2024).
  23. Wyper, G.M.A.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Mathers, C.D.; McDonald, S.A.; Speybroeck, N. Years of Life Lost Methods Must Remain Fully Equitable and Accountable. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2022, 37, 215–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Devleesschauwer, B.; McDonald, S.A.; Speybroeck, N.; Wyper, G.M.A. Valuing the Years of Life Lost Due to COVID-19: The Differences and Pitfalls. Int. J. Public Health 2020, 65, 719–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ferenci, T. Different Approaches to Quantify Years of Life Lost from COVID-19. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2021, 36, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kirigia, J.M.; Muthuri, R.N.D.K. The Fiscal Value of Human Lives Lost from Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) in China. BMC Res. Notes 2020, 13, 198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hanlon, P.; Chadwick, F.; Shah, A.; Wood, R.; Minton, J.; McCartney, G.; Fischbacher, C.; Mair, F.S.; Husmeier, D.; Matthiopoulos, J.; et al. COVID-19—Exploring the Implications of Long-Term Condition Type and Extent of Multimorbidity on Years of Life Lost: A Modelling Study. Wellcome Open Res. 2020, 5, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Romania: Country Health Profile 2021. Available online: https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/romania-country-health-profile-2021_74ad9999-en (accessed on 12 October 2023).
  29. Core Health Indicators in the WHO European Region Special Focus: 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda. 2020, p. 4. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/338902/WHO-EURO-2020-1887-41638-56893-eng.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2023).
  30. Mitra, A.K.; Payton, M.; Kabir, N.; Whitehead, A.; Ragland, K.N.; Brown, A. Potential Years of Life Lost Due to COVID-19 in the United States, Italy, and Germany: An Old Formula with Newer Ideas. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Ordin 1829 27/10/2020—Portal Legislativ. n.d. Available online: https://legislatie.just.ro/Public/DetaliiDocument/231825 (accessed on 15 December 2023).
  32. Tempo Online. n.d. Available online: http://statistici.insse.ro:8077/tempo-online/ (accessed on 12 October 2023).
  33. Revision of the European Standard Population Report of Eurostat’s task force. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 2013. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5926869/KS-RA-13-028-EN.PDF/e713fa79-1add-44e8-b23d-5e8fa09b3f8f (accessed on 7 January 2024).
  34. QGIS.org, %Y. QGIS Geographic Information System. QGIS Association. Available online: https://www.qgis.org/en/site/ (accessed on 7 January 2024).
  35. The R Project for Statistical Computing. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 30 January 2024).
  36. Vieira, A.; Ricoca, V.P.; Aguiar, P.; Sousa, P.; Nunes, C.; Abrantes, A. Years of Life Lost by COVID-19 in Portugal and Comparison with Other European Countries in 2020. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Hulíková Tesárková, K.; Dzúrová, D. COVID-19: Years of Life Lost (YLL) and Saved (YLS) as an Expression of the Role of Vaccination. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 18129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Jiang, S.; Cai, D.; Chen, D.; Jiang, Y. An Analysis of Life-Year Lost Due to COVID-19—34 Countries, December 2019–March 2021. China CDC Wkly. 2022, 4, 494–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gökler, M.E.; Metintaş, S. Years of Potential Life Lost and Productivity Costs Due to COVID-19 in Turkey: One Yearly Evaluation. Public Health 2022, 203, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Williams, G.; Spencer, A.; Farragher, T.; Gittins, M.; Verma, A. Years of Life Lost to COVID-19 in 20 Countries. J. Glob. Health 2022, 12, 05007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Pifarré i Arolas, H.; Acosta, E.; López-Casasnovas, G.; Lo, A.; Nicodemo, C.; Riffe, T.; Myrskylä, M. Years of Life Lost to COVID-19 in 81 Countries. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 3504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Túri, G.; Kassay, J.; Virág, A.; Dózsa, C.; Horváth, K.; Lorenzovici, L. Riding the Pandemic Waves—Lessons to Be Learned from the COVID-19 Crisis Management in Romania. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Oprita, B.; Davidoiu, A.; Dinu, A.B.; Oprita, R. The Rescue of the Romanian Health System by the Emergency Departments during the Fourth Wave of COVID-19 Pandemic. Life 2022, 12, 1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study population selection.
Figure 1. Study population selection.
Healthcare 12 01189 g001
Figure 2. The proportion of premature deaths (<80 years) of the total deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases, for both genders, by Romanian counties. Notes: Between the two years calculated using the chi-squared test; p < 0.05 was obtained in the case of Hunedoara counties (0.04463) and Olt (0.0214); p < 0.01 for Prahova County (0.006594); for the other counties p > 0.05.
Figure 2. The proportion of premature deaths (<80 years) of the total deaths from confirmed COVID-19 cases, for both genders, by Romanian counties. Notes: Between the two years calculated using the chi-squared test; p < 0.05 was obtained in the case of Hunedoara counties (0.04463) and Olt (0.0214); p < 0.01 for Prahova County (0.006594); for the other counties p > 0.05.
Healthcare 12 01189 g002
Figure 3. Sex ratio of premature deaths (<80 years) in each county to confirmed COVID-19 cases in 2020.
Figure 3. Sex ratio of premature deaths (<80 years) in each county to confirmed COVID-19 cases in 2020.
Healthcare 12 01189 g003
Figure 4. Sex ratio of premature deaths (<80 years) in each county to confirmed COVID-19 cases in 2021.
Figure 4. Sex ratio of premature deaths (<80 years) in each county to confirmed COVID-19 cases in 2021.
Healthcare 12 01189 g004
Figure 5. PYLL’s standardized rate of confirmed COVID–19 cases, for both genders, in 2020. Map created using the Free and Open Source QGIS.
Figure 5. PYLL’s standardized rate of confirmed COVID–19 cases, for both genders, in 2020. Map created using the Free and Open Source QGIS.
Healthcare 12 01189 g005
Figure 6. PYLL’s standardized rate of confirmed COVID-19 cases, for both genders, in 2021. Map created using the Free and Open Source QGIS.
Figure 6. PYLL’s standardized rate of confirmed COVID-19 cases, for both genders, in 2021. Map created using the Free and Open Source QGIS.
Healthcare 12 01189 g006
Figure 7. Proportion of premature deaths by age groups (both genders) in 2020 and 2021.
Figure 7. Proportion of premature deaths by age groups (both genders) in 2020 and 2021.
Healthcare 12 01189 g007
Figure 8. Proportion of PYLL by age groups (both genders) in 2020 and 2021.
Figure 8. Proportion of PYLL by age groups (both genders) in 2020 and 2021.
Healthcare 12 01189 g008
Table 1. Number of deaths and PYLL according to the counties of Romania and Bucharest in confirmed COVID-19 cases in both genders in 2020.
Table 1. Number of deaths and PYLL according to the counties of Romania and Bucharest in confirmed COVID-19 cases in both genders in 2020.
Administrative-Territorial UnitDeaths—All AgesPremature DeathsPYLLPYLL/
Death
NumberCrude Rate *NumberCrude Rate *NumberCrude Rate *
ALBA340105.3525784.0534181117.8513.30
ARAD607146.42458115.6463951614.6813.96
ARGEŞ768134.35570104.9379661466.5013.98
BACĂU56296.9540874.075502998.8313.49
BIHOR811144.99618115.0691231698.4914.76
BISTRIŢA-NĂSĂUD366131.9525997.3432861234.9412.69
BOTOŞANI35594.5326374.3237011045.8614.07
BRAŞOV688124.1947689.7964891224.0713.63
BRĂILA311109.7021681.2027791044.7112.87
BUZĂU26063.9218348.042835744.1815.49
CARAŞ-SEVERIN370137.91285111.5637701475.7813.23
CĂLĂRAŞI26494.4920477.4429291111.9314.36
CLUJ64590.8039558.234514665.4211.43
CONSTANŢA688102.6149777.146332982.8212.74
COVASNA17386.1211861.241213629.5110.28
DÂMBOVIŢA48399.4938282.7056311219.1114.74
DOLJ29747.9422738.573141533.6313.84
GALAŢI539107.4736676.584580958.2912.51
GIURGIU7127.074819.46761308.5015.85
GORJ27388.0421673.122915986.7713.50
HARGHITA27992.8719567.842364822.3712.12
HUNEDOARA454120.2633793.9942531186.1712.62
IALOMIŢA25399.6118878.1927121127.8614.43
IAŞI72190.5651267.056797890.1513.28
ILFOV28357.1319240.083088644.6616.08
MARAMUREŞ566123.81440100.0458341326.4013.26
MEHEDINŢI21088.3516774.1424601092.1214.73
BUCHAREST177496.68120868.7516,189921.3013.40
MUREŞ658123.7847293.1166851318.7514.16
NEAMŢ38487.9526163.603725907.7214.27
OLT28372.9323965.3536731004.3515.37
PRAHOVA898126.79691103.3593541399.0513.54
SATU MARE13239.9310031.261317411.6913.17
SĂLAJ18186.3413065.201843924.3114.18
SIBIU628156.64440114.2462271616.7714.15
SUCEAVA869139.23622104.8785391439.7513.73
TELEORMAN17954.7714247.112174721.1815.31
TIMIŞ64891.7050974.7270041028.1813.76
TULCEA18797.8714579.3819081044.5513.16
VASLUI389104.7627678.3439621124.6014.36
VÂLCEA30688.0921868.202894905.3113.28
VRANCEA30295.5022274.6032071077.6614.45
Total—Romania19,455100.8214,15277.04193,4891053.2813.67
* Per 100,000 inhabitants.
Table 2. Number of deaths and PYLL according to the counties of Romania and Bucharest in confirmed COVID-19 cases in both genders in 2021.
Table 2. Number of deaths and PYLL according to the counties of Romania and Bucharest in confirmed COVID-19 cases in both genders in 2021.
Administrative-Territorial UnitDeaths—All AgesPremature DeathsPYLLPYLL/
Death
NumberCrude Rate *NumberCrude Rate *NumberCrude Rate *
ALBA815252.00587191.0077492521.4013.20
ARAD1104268.13799202.7010,5902686.5813.25
ARGEŞ1065187.70760140.6896971794.9312.76
BACĂU1253213.24878156.8211,9062126.5813.56
BIHOR1581284.991241232.6317,2623235.8313.91
BISTRIŢA-NĂSĂUD670234.35512186.1867072438.9013.10
BOTOŞANI856224.34614170.1683182305.2013.55
BRAŞOV1196217.12807152.9810,4881988.2313.00
BRĂILA716255.23529200.5669062618.2213.05
BUZĂU619153.27430113.3558331537.6513.57
CARAŞ-SEVERIN794309.67624255.4786803553.6513.91
CĂLĂRAŞI621221.83468176.6066592512.7614.23
CLUJ1321189.59868130.4910,2711544.0911.83
CONSTANŢA1580238.631153181.1915,0632367.0613.06
COVASNA416207.91296154.1341812177.1114.13
DÂMBOVIŢA881183.18656143.0291371992.0613.93
DOLJ1066175.37802138.7211,0581912.7213.79
GALAŢI1141230.42821173.8111,5062435.9214.01
GIURGIU421161.47322130.7745561850.3314.15
GORJ594191.25446150.3965152196.8614.61
HARGHITA601203.42426150.5454121912.4612.70
HUNEDOARA795216.43546156.4765151867.0811.93
IALOMIŢA667265.45467195.9268912891.0414.76
IAŞI1375176.21961128.3312,7171698.2113.23
ILFOV634120.8646290.8069461365.1215.03
MARAMUREŞ1050231.65836191.5711,6402667.3413.92
MEHEDINŢI658279.83500223.7970153139.8114.03
BUCHAREST3378190.502246132.3529,2501723.6513.02
MUREŞ1045199.33730145.9010,1142021.4313.85
NEAMŢ1070241.75740177.4099912395.1213.50
OLT554144.32429118.1761061681.9214.23
PRAHOVA1802257.781297196.2016,8402547.4312.98
SATU MARE606183.68448140.1959411859.1313.26
SĂLAJ507241.10353176.0542312110.0611.99
SIBIU1036262.51752198.2697512570.7712.97
SUCEAVA1295205.38908151.1312,2282035.3113.47
TELEORMAN587181.56435145.0857591920.7413.24
TIMIŞ1243183.07944144.3013,2362023.2614.02
TULCEA318166.29243132.5631381711.8112.91
VASLUI877236.62619175.6183152358.9413.43
VÂLCEA571166.05414129.3253851682.0513.01
VRANCEA587181.00408133.0855581812.8313.62
Total—Romania39,966208.9628,777157.77386,0612116.6313.42
* Per 100,000 inhabitants.
Table 3. PYLL indicators by gender in 2020.
Table 3. PYLL indicators by gender in 2020.
Administrative-Territorial UnitPremature Deaths—NumberPYLLCrude Rate of PYLL per 100,000 InhabitantsPYLL/Deatht-Test
FemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMalep Value
ALBA10115612272191804.381429.9212.1514.040.1
ARAD175283260037951.300.011935.6914.8613.410.1
ARGEŞ18438625795387942.541998.3114.0213.960.9
BACĂU14526318383664669.321326.3912.6813.930.2
BIHOR253365359155321.325.162078.6114.1915.160.3
BISTRIŢA-NĂSĂUD10615312921994977.561488.9512.1913.030.5
BOTOŞANI11315014852216853.021232.6013.1414.770.2
BRAŞOV17230421894300814.891644.4012.7314.140.1
BRĂILA8213410171762766.541321.5012.4013.150.5
BUZĂU7810511471688605.10881.9414.7116.080.4
CARAŞ-SEVERIN106179132824421.032.281925.7012.5313.640.4
CĂLĂRAŞI8412010621867810.871409.6512.6415.560.03
CLUJ16523017972717517.54820.4910.8911.810.3
CONSTANŢA18331420694263630.851347.7811.3113.580.007
COVASNA4375393820409.17848.499.1410.930.3
DÂMBOVIŢA14523719723659862.081569.4013.6015.440.08
DOLJ9113611332008382.61686.5312.4514.760.1
GALAŢI12524114003180584.581333.6311.2013.200.06
GIURGIU1830277484228.90385.1515.3916.130.8
GORJ7913710591856719.761251.7213.4113.550.9
HARGHITA691269041460629.911014.2513.1011.590.3
HUNEDOARA13720016662587924.371450.7812.1612.940.4
IALOMIŢA701188971815751.001499.8312.8115.380.09
IAŞI17333920034794528.771245.9211.5814.140.006
ILFOV641287652323317.04977.2211.9518.15<0.00001
MARAMUREŞ16227821493685970.441687.3313.2713.261
MEHEDINŢI541137001760623.551557.6612.9615.580.1
BUCHAREST441767551310,676594.191287.2312.5013.920.01
MUREŞ182290259040951019.111620.0214.2314.120.9
NEAMŢ10715415912134776.871038.0914.8713.860.4
OLT7816112432430684.251320.2915.9415.090.5
PRAHOVA270421362757271078.511723.4413.4313.600.8
SATU MARE3664494823304.10522.7013.7212.860.7
SĂLAJ61697971046798.311050.6513.0715.160.3
SIBIU162278202242051035.232215.1312.4815.130.01
SUCEAVA225397298555541014.271858.8413.2713.990.4
TELEORMAN43995181656348.771082.8812.0516.730.01
TIMIŞ20230726914313777.341287.3713.3214.050.4
TULCEA57886781230751.191331.0811.8913.980.1
VASLUI10417214832479862.531374.4214.2614.410.9
VÂLCEA761429651929605.061204.2812.7013.580.5
VRANCEA8713512201987817.841338.8014.0214.720.6
Total—Romania5308884468,956124,533745.361365.6912.9914.08<0.00001
Table 4. PYLL indicators by gender in 2021.
Table 4. PYLL indicators by gender in 2021.
Administrative-Territorial UnitPremature Deaths—NumberPYLLCrude Rate of PYLL per 100,000 InhabitantsPYLL/Deatht-Test
FemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMalep Value
ALBA295292400137482603.142439.6313.5612.840.3
ARAD397402495556352483.162895.1312.4814.020.02
ARGEŞ331429404956481480.902116.7012.2313.170.2
BACĂU403475526566411878.892374.7613.0613.980.2
BIHOR618623842488383119.133355.4813.6314.190.3
BISTRIŢA-NĂSĂUD241271316635412312.212564.5313.1413.070.9
BOTOŞANI286328375345652110.502494.3713.1213.920.3
BRAŞOV374433461258761717.622268.7812.3313.570.055
BRĂILA263266341234942572.882664.0612.9713.140.8
BUZĂU187243231635171219.141857.1512.3914.470.04
CARAŞ-SEVERIN302322413845423350.203761.7713.7014.110.6
CĂLĂRAŞI238230323434252445.762579.4913.5914.890.2
CLUJ420448457856931344.421753.5110.9012.710.004
CONSTANŢA502651629487691937.712814.7212.5413.470.1
COVASNA125171165125301716.482639.2913.2114.800.2
DÂMBOVIŢA286370371054271622.352359.6612.9714.670.02
DOLJ332470431267461473.542362.8612.9914.350.055
GALAŢI365456494165652077.922798.8513.5414.400.2
GIURGIU154168220823481813.951885.8814.3413.980.8
GORJ179267260839071760.972631.7014.5714.630.9
HARGHITA187239211832941494.782331.3311.3313.780.01
HUNEDOARA263283306834471733.912004.0711.6712.180.5
IALOMIŢA219248293739542472.393306.9913.4115.940.008
IAŞI440521552071971477.141918.4312.5513.810.04
ILFOV210252292040261130.941606.3813.9015.980.04
MARAMUREŞ411425543462062466.642871.9613.2214.600.054
MEHEDINŢI226274312438912791.283489.6513.8214.200.7
BUCHAREST994125212,11217,1381345.562150.7412.1913.69<0.00001
MUREŞ329401424758671687.082359.9812.9114.630.04
NEAMŢ328412414158501975.262819.3212.6314.200.02
OLT181248253335731402.001959.2513.9914.410.7
PRAHOVA617680745593852228.322874.4112.0813.800.001
SATU MARE230218279331481718.352004.8712.1414.440.01
SĂLAJ180173203321982017.612203.4411.2912.710.1
SIBIU359393458951622380.212767.7712.7813.130.6
SUCEAVA421487538068481795.852273.4712.7814.060.054
TELEORMAN206229246732921658.502178.9211.9814.380.006
TIMIŞ448496594172951780.512275.9613.2614.710.02
TULCEA96147133318051461.541959.6113.8912.280.2
VASLUI280339366546502125.032583.0313.0913.720.4
VÂLCEA192222251128741741.221508.3313.0812.950.9
VRANCEA193215253430241927.731580.0513.1314.070.3
Total—Romania13,30815,469170,482215,5792320.001787.9912.8113.94<0.00001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahotă, D.M.; Țîrț, D.P.; Daina, L.G.; Daina, C.M.; Ilea, C.D.N. Using Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) to Compare Premature Mortality between Romanian Counties to Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in 2020 and 2021. Healthcare 2024, 12, 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12121189

AMA Style

Rahotă DM, Țîrț DP, Daina LG, Daina CM, Ilea CDN. Using Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) to Compare Premature Mortality between Romanian Counties to Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in 2020 and 2021. Healthcare. 2024; 12(12):1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12121189

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahotă, Diana Maria, Dorel Petru Țîrț, Lucia Georgeta Daina, Cristian Marius Daina, and Codrin Dan Nicolae Ilea. 2024. "Using Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) to Compare Premature Mortality between Romanian Counties to Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in 2020 and 2021" Healthcare 12, no. 12: 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12121189

APA Style

Rahotă, D. M., Țîrț, D. P., Daina, L. G., Daina, C. M., & Ilea, C. D. N. (2024). Using Potential Years of Life Lost (PYLL) to Compare Premature Mortality between Romanian Counties to Confirmed COVID-19 Cases in 2020 and 2021. Healthcare, 12(12), 1189. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12121189

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop