Qualitative Analysis of Conversational Chatbots to Alleviate Loneliness in Older Adults as a Strategy for Emotional Health
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Review of Previous Approaches
3.2. Qualitative Research on the Needs of Older Adults
3.3. Chatbot Evaluation
4. Results
4.1. Literature Review
4.1.1. Trends, Prior Approaches, and Gaps
4.1.2. Design Aspects of Chatbots
4.1.3. Emotional and Social Perceptions of Older Adults
4.1.4. Technology Adoption and Utility
4.1.5. Barriers to Technology Use
4.2. Qualitative Research on the Needs of Older Adults
E2: “[…] what I need is someone to talk to […], when I find myself so alone at night in my house, I think, what if something happens to me and I can’t even press the button, who will find me here, and above all when […]”
E4: “[…] experience tells me that it already happened to my mother and father, my children are not nearby, I only have a few acquaintances in the neighborhood, who are becoming fewer, and every day I’m more alone, when one finishes their work stage and, on top of that, your wife goes to heaven […] everything had to end for me too. My life today is very sad.”
FG2.1: “[…] my day-to-day is not very exciting, but I’m getting by, I have moments of everything, but today I’m happy because we are talking here […]”
4.2.1. Company and Social Connection
E20: “[…], it’s just that my life is different now. Even though I’m surrounded by people here, it’s not my home, next to my neighbor, where I raised my children and where I have my acquaintances. I used to go out to the square, and just talking to others there gave me life. But of course, my children are far away now, and my husband is no longer here, and that’s why I’m here. I’m fine here, but the truth is that I feel more alone than in my own home […]”
E15: “[…] I was feeling so-so at home because most days I didn’t talk to anyone. I need to go out, talk, meet with relatives, with work friends. The truth is, my children don’t leave me much, but at least they call me on the phone, if it’s not one, it’s the other, and my granddaughters, they make video calls, and at least I see them. But, in the end, I was alone at home […], and I told my daughters that I was coming to the residence because it’s in the same neighborhood, and I can almost stick to my routines, but now I’m taken care of. If there’s an emergency here, it’s better, plus, we have many activities, and I do things that cheer me up.”
FG1.6: “[…] the thing about having my activities every day, sports, the association, those things that, even though they are not work, I do now because I want to, and they keep me active and in touch with the world.”
4.2.2. Emotional Support
E2: “[…] I need to go out every day, I go to the club, I have my friends, we meet for breakfast in the center, then we stroll through the shops, something usually catches our eye, some days we even meet for lunch, well […]. My reality hits at night because we only meet on weekends and some holidays, and of course, the rest of the days, the nights become long.”
FG1.4: “[…] look, what really gets to me is when ALEXA says, ‘you are a great human,’ […] how can this device talk to you like a human, great, […], well, it’s a device and it says things without feelings, with an understanding of what you tell it or express to it at that moment.”
E3: “[…] I started by just using these things from social networks, and then I took a course where they really taught me how to use them. That’s where I learned that what really limited me was the difficulty of the unknown. Now, every day, I meet more people, and above all, I have my loved ones closer.”
4.2.3. Meaningful Occupation
FG1.5: “[…] well, let me tell you, in this, I go further. My life has been very active, and what I need is not only to avoid feeling alone in many moments, but also to have resources that allow me to discover new things, so that my time is satisfied and rewarded every day by doing new things. Today, the technological aspect has advanced a lot, and it is important to create things for older people as well, as not everyone is like me.”
FG1.6: “[…] it helped me a lot to see other people who record their videos and share many activities and skills that the rest of us can do.”
FG2.5: “[…] when I fell and broke my hip, that’s when I was truly alone; I couldn’t do anything interesting or talk to anyone […]”
4.2.4. Access to Health and Well-Being Resources
FG1.8: “[…] when I go out to buy groceries, well, actually, I go out to get bread, but I say groceries; I do it to see people and talk to someone, it’s my little chat time. […] but what gives me the most trouble is scheduling appointments with my doctor, that’s why I go to the health center […]”
E16: “[…], not anymore because I’m here, but before, in my house, every time I had to go to the doctor, it was two or three trips, and for the bank, I took the approach of going in the middle of the month because it was impossible.”
FG1.4: “[…] I started using video calls and some applications for interactive games a while ago, but when COVID hit, I learned even more, and today it makes it easier for me to schedule a phone appointment and have a consultation through a video call […]”
FG2.6: “[…] I don’t understand much about this, but it seems important that these things are also taught to older people; we are also in the world.”
4.2.5. Safe Environment and Personal Care
E17: “[…] I am here because for me and for my children, the important thing is that I am taken care of when I need it. I had a stroke, and I was alone until my daughter arrived and could come to me. But that was lucky; I need to be taken care of, and that’s why I’m here […]. Many times, we think our children are close, but things happen, and we are alone. That’s why I thought what I thought and said, I’d better be in a nursing home.”
E1: “[…] for me, it is very important to be in company, but more importantly, it is to feel secure in my home, knowing that if something happens, someone will come to me.”
E13: “[…] you see, if I had had a companion, a device that reminds me of my medication, reminds me of my medical appointments, the birthdays of my daughters and grandchildren, […] I would stay in my home for more years.”
FG1.7: “[…] as I’ve been saying, I have been using many technological resources for a long time, but what I mean is, with so many things available today, why aren’t more effective things done for us? So that we feel cared for, attended to, with control of appointments and medication, […], or things like that. I know this can be done, but I haven’t seen it, and it would be a very good thing for people like us.”
4.2.6. Technological Adaptability
FG2.4: “[…] since COVID, I started using my tablet to access some of these online gaming sites and social networks. Honestly, I feel more accompanied, and I meet people […]. It’s true that you don’t know these people in person, but at least you talk to someone. And then, I combine it with some outings, friends, and family. Especially my daughter, who tells me to be careful with social networks […].”
FG2.4: “[…] for me, it’s very difficult to use these things, but of course, I understand that they can help us. But I think it’s very difficult for me to learn it now.”
FG1.4: “[…], ideally, we should have easy-to-use resources that we can use.”
FG1.6: “[…], look, I have been using computers for a long time, because of my job, but I tell you that there are many things I don’t know how to do. Many new things come up that I don’t use because I don’t know how they work. If they explain things to me well, I could definitely do them […].”
4.3. Chatbot Evaluation
4.3.1. CATe Chatbot
4.3.2. Charlie Chatbot
4.3.3. ElliQ Chatbot
5. Discussion
5.1. The Ideal Chatbot Based on Conducted Studies
5.2. Practical Recommendations for Interface Development
5.3. Ethical Considerations in Chatbot Development
5.4. Limitations
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A. Semi-Structured Interview Design
Appendix A.1. Introduction:
- Greetings and researcher introduction.
- Explanation of the interview purpose: to explore experiences related to loneliness and the use of technology among older adults.
Appendix A.2. Section 1: Loneliness and Influencing Factors
- Introductory questions:
- How would you define the feeling of loneliness?
- Have you experienced the sensation of loneliness recently?
- 2.
- Exploration of influencing factors:
- What do you believe are the factors contributing to your experience of loneliness?
- Are there emotional, social, or environmental aspects influencing your feelings of loneliness?
Appendix A.3. Section 2: Coping with Loneliness
- 3.
- Traditional strategies:
- What traditional strategies or in-person activities do you use to cope with loneliness?
- 4.
- Technology and coping with loneliness:
- Have you ever considered using technology as a way to combat loneliness?
- What types of technology have you tried or considered for this purpose?
Appendix A.4. Section 3: Perception of Technology
- 5.
- Role of technology:
- How do you perceive the role of technology in your life in relation to loneliness?
- Do you believe technology can offer significant emotional and social support?
Appendix A.5. Section 4: Technological Barriers
- 6.
- Perceived barriers:
- Are there obstacles or concerns preventing you from using technology to combat loneliness?
- How would you describe your current experience with technology in this context?
Appendix A.6. Closure
- 7.
- Final reflection:
- Is there anything else you would like to share about your experience of loneliness and its relationship with technology?
- Thanks, and offering to answer additional questions if necessary.
Appendix B. Focus Group Design
Appendix B.1. Introduction
- A brief introduction of the moderator and the purpose of the focus group.
- Express gratitude to the participants for their involvement and contribution.
Appendix B.2. Round of Introductions
- A brief introduction of each participant, including their experience with technology and their perception of loneliness.
Appendix B.3. Section 1: Factors Affecting Loneliness
- Discussion on key factors:
- Identification and discussion of factors that participants consider significant in their experience of loneliness.
Appendix B.4. Section 2: Coping with Loneliness
- 2.
- Strategies and Technology:
- Share experiences on traditional strategies and the use of technology to cope with loneliness.
- Have you ever experimented with chatbots to address loneliness?
Appendix B.5. Section 3: Perception of Technology Empathy
- 3.
- Technology Empathy:
- Explore the perception of empathy in the technology used.
- How would you describe the emotional interaction with some form of technology, such as chatbots?
Appendix B.6. Section 4: Associated Emotions and Perceived Barriers
- 4.
- Emotions and Barriers:
- Share the emotions associated with interacting with some form of technology.
- Identification and discussion of possible perceived barriers to adopting technology in the context of loneliness.
Appendix B.7. Closure
- 5.
- Final Reflection:
- Allow participants to reflect on the discussion and add any additional thoughts.
- Thanks, and farewell.
References
- Taylor, H.O. Social isolation’s influence on loneliness among older adults. Clin. Soc. Work. J. 2020, 48, 140–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roy, K.; Smilowitz, S.; Bhatt, S.; Conroy, M. Impact of Social Isolation and Loneliness in Older Adults: Current Understanding and Future Directions. Curr. Geriatr. Rep. 2023, 12, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ring, L.; Barry, B.; Totzke, K.; Bickmore, T. Addressing Loneliness and Isolation in Older Adults: Proactive Affective Agents Provide Better Support. In Proceedings of the 2013 Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, Geneva, Switzerland, 2–5 September 2013; pp. 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wygnańska, J. The Experience of Conversation and Relation with a Well-Being Chabot: Between Proximity and Remoteness. Qual. Sociol. Rev. 2023, 19, 92–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Locsin, R.C.; Soriano, G.P.; Juntasopeepun, P.; Kunaviktikul, W.; Evangelista, L.S. Social transformation and social isolation of older adults: Digital technologies, nursing, healthcare. Collegian 2021, 28, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, Z.; Sheng, W.; Yang, G.; Bishop, A.; Carlson, B. Adaptation of a robotic dialog system for medication reminder in elderly care. Smart Health 2022, 26, 100346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Perez, H.; Neubauer, N.; Marshall, S.; Philip, S.; Miguel-Cruz, A.; Liu, L. Barriers and Benefits of Information Communication Technologies Used by Health Care Aides. Appl. Clin. Inform. 2022, 13, 270–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Denzin, N.K. Sociological Methods: A Source Book; Aldine Publishing Company: London, UK, 1970. [Google Scholar]
- Grant, M.J.; Booth, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Inf. Libr. J. 2009, 26, 91–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sandoval Casilimas, C.A. Investigación Cualitativa; Especialización en Teoría, Métodos y Técnicas de Investigación Social; Hemeroteca Nacional Universitaria Carlos Lleras Restrepo. Subdirección de Fomento y Desarrollo de la Educación Superior; Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior, ICFES: Bogotá, Colombia, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Page, M.J.; Mckenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thakur, N.; Han, C.Y. An approach to analyze the social acceptance of virtual assistants by elderly people. In Proceedings of the IOT’18: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things, Santa Barbara, CA, USA, 15–18 October 2018; p. 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolaños, M.; Collazos, C.A.; Gutiérrez, F. Adapting a Virtual Assistant Device to Support the Interaction with Elderly People. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE 2020), Prague, Czech Republic, 3–5 May 2020; pp. 291–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Razavi, S.Z.; Schubert, L.K.; Orden, K.A.V.; Ali, M.R. Discourse Behavior of Older Adults Interacting With a Dialogue Agent Competent in Multiple Topics. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2019, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lappromrattana, T.; Sooraksa, P. Quick Prototyping of Companion Bots for Elderly People. Sens. Mater. 2023, 35, 1487–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasteiger, N.; Loveys, K.; Law, M.; Broadbent, E. Friends from the Future: A Scoping Review of Research into Robots and Computer Agents to Combat Loneliness in Older People. Clin. Interv. Aging 2021, 16, 941–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bastardo, R.; Pavão, J.; Rocha, N.P.D. Embodied Communication Agents: A Scoping Review of the Impact of Applications to Support Older Adults. In Information Systems and Technologies, Proceedings of the WorldCIST 2022, World Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, Budva, Montenegro, 12–14 April 2022; Lecture notes in Networks and Systems; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fakhr Hosseini, S.; Lee, C.; Miller, J.; Patskanick, T.; Coughlin, J.F. Older Adults’ Opinion on Social Robot as Companion. In Proceedings of the 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (ROMAN), Naples, Italy, 31 August–4 September 2020; pp. 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto, N.D.P.; França, J.B.D.S.; Sousa, H.P.; Vivacqua, A.S.; Garcia, A.C.B. Conversational Agents for Elderly Interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE 24th International Conference on Computer Supported COoperative Work in Design (CSCWD), Dalian, China, 5–7 May 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jegundo, A.L.; Dantas, C.; Quintas, J.; Dutra, J.; Almeida, A.L.; Caravau, H.; Rosa, A.F.; Martins, A.I.; Pacheco Rocha, N. Perceived Usefulness, Satisfaction, Ease of Use and Potential of a Virtual Companion to Support the Care Provision for Older Adults. Technologies 2020, 8, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valtolina, S.; Hu, L. Charlie: A chatbot to improve the elderly quality of life and to make them more active to fight their sense of loneliness. In Proceedings of the 14th Biannual Conference of the Italian SIGCHI Chapter, CHItaly ’21, Bolzano, Italy, 11–13 July 2021; p. 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alessa, A.; Al-Khalifa, H.S. Towards Designing a ChatGPT Conversational Companion for Elderly People. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, PETRA’23, Corfu, Greece, 5–7 July 2023; pp. 667–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Troncone, A.; Amorese, T.; Cuciniello, M.; Saturno, R.; Pugliese, L.; Cordasco, G.; Vogel, C.; Esposito, A. Advanced Assistive Technologies for Elderly People: A Psychological Perspective on Seniors’ Needs and Preferences (part A). Acta Polytech. Hung. 2020, 17, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martin-Hammond, A.; Vemireddy, S.; Rao, K. Exploring Older Adults’ Beliefs About the Use of Intelligent Assistants for Consumer Health Information Management: A Participatory Design Study. JMIR Aging 2019, 2, e15381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baker, S.; Warburton, J.; Waycott, J.; Batchelor, F.; Hoang, T.; Dow, B.; Ozanne, E.; Vetere, F. Combatting social isolation and increasing social participation of older adults through the use of technology: A systematic review of existing evidence. Australas. J. Ageing 2018, 37, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dosovitsky, G.; Bunge, E.L. Bonding With Bot: User Feedback on a Chatbot for Social Isolation. Front. Digit. Health 2021, 3, 735053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Biallas, M.; Lu, G.M.; Stieger, M.; Moist, R.; Adrushevich, A.; Paice, A. Exploring the Potential of Conversational Interfaces for Care of Older Adults: Insights from Stakeholder Workshops. In Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Assistive Technology: Shaping a Sustainable and Inclusive World; Archambault, D., Kouroupetroglou, G., Eds.; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherland, 2023; Volume 306, pp. 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, Y.; Lin, C.W.; Lee, S.; Chien, Y.C.; Cheng, L. Potential Mobile Health Applications for Improving the Mental Health of the Elderly: A Systematic Review. Clin. Interv. Aging 2023, 18, 1523–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bravo, S.L.; Herrera, C.J.; Valdez, E.C.; Poliquit, K.J.; Ureta, J.C.; Cu, J.; Azcarraga, J.; Rivera, J.P. CATE: An Embodied Conversational Agent for the Elderly. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART 2020), Valletta, Malta, 22–24 February 2020; Volume 2, pp. 941–948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sidner, C.L.; Bickmore, T.; Nooraie, B.; Rich, C.; Ring, L.; Shayganfar, M.; Vardoulakis, L. Creating New Technologies for Companionable Agents to Support Isolated Older Adults. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2018, 8, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kramer, L.L.; Velsen, L.V.; Clark, J.; Mulder, B.C.; Vet, E.D. Use and effect of embodied conversational agents for improving eating behavior and decreasing loneliness among community-dwelling older adults: A randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form. Res. 2022, 6, e33974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Characteristic | Nursing Homes | Private Homes | Focus Group 1 | Focus Group 2 |
---|---|---|---|---|
(n = 20) | (n = 6) | (n = 8) | (n = 8) | |
Age Range | ||||
65 to 74 years | 30% | 33.3% | 50% | 37.5% |
75 to 80 years | 70% | 66.7% | 50% | 62.5% |
Gender Distribution | ||||
Male | 40% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Female | 60% | 50% | 50% | 50% |
Marital status | ||||
Widowed | 80% | 100% | 62.5% | 75% |
Married | 5% | 12.5% | 25% | |
Single | 15% | 25% | ||
Housing Arrangements | ||||
Nursing Homes | 100% | |||
Rented Apartments | 50% | 25% | 62.5% | |
Owned Apartments | 50% | 37.5% | 37.5% | |
Owned Single-family Houses | 37.5% | |||
Education Levels | ||||
Illiterate | 20% | |||
Basic Literacy without Education | 40% | 25% | ||
Primary Education | 20% | 33.3% | 37.5% | |
High School or Equivalent | 10% | 33.3% | 37.5% | 37.5% |
Higher Education/University | 10% | 33.3% | 62.5% | |
Work Experience | ||||
Professional Roles | 20% | 100% | 100% | |
Itinerant Jobs | 65% | 100% | ||
No paid Professions | 15% | |||
Family Proximity | 100% | 83.30% | 100% | 87.50% |
Topic | Description |
---|---|
Growing demand for solutions for older adults | There is an increasing demand for solutions to support the health, social participation, and independent living of the older adults’ population [12]. |
Technical focus in chatbot development | Research has focused on technical aspects such as natural language processing and machine learning algorithms [13]. |
Functionalities of chatbots in previous studies | Focus on functionalities such as reminders and medication management [13]. |
Current trends | There is an increase in the use of chatbots for health coaching and social support and an interest in personalization through natural language processing and machine learning [14]. |
Exploration of linguistic and emotional aspects | Use of linguistic and emotional features, as well as avatars and robots as companions for older adults [14]. |
Trend towards technological interventions for social isolation | Growing trend in using technology to address social isolation and loneliness in older adults [16]. |
Gaps in the representation of older adults in studies | Underrepresentation of older adults, especially those aged 85 and above, in research on the acceptance of social robots [18]. |
There is a need for research on attitudes towards social robots | Lack of a complete understanding of the attitudes and experiences of older adults towards social robots suggests the need for more research [18]. |
Focus on chatbot personalization | Personalization in chatbots for interaction with older adults involves adapting language and features to the user’s personality and needs [19]. |
Barriers to technology adoption | Barriers to technology adoption by older adults include difficulties with instructions and concerns about privacy and security [21]. |
Lack of standardization in technological interventions | There is a lack of standardization in the design and implementation of technological interventions, making it challenging to compare results across studies [16]. |
Need for research on long-term effects | There is limited research on the long-term effects of technological interventions and their effectiveness in different populations of older adults [16]. |
Lack of standardization in chatbot evaluation | There is a need for standardization in chatbot evaluation, requiring holistic analyses of their impact on the lives of older adults [19]. |
Research on chatbot accessibility | Research on chatbot accessibility for those with physical and cognitive limitations [19]. |
There is a need for research on emotional impact | There is a need for research on the emotional impact of chatbots on older adults, seeking solutions that provide meaningful and effective support [19]. |
There is a need for research on social and emotional aspects | There is a need for research on social and emotional aspects of designing technologies that adapt to the individual needs and preferences of older users [12]. |
Use of sentiment analysis | Use of sentiment analysis to assess the social acceptance of virtual assistants [12]. |
Need to explore ethical implications | We need to explore ethical implications in the use of virtual assistants, focusing on issues such as privacy, security, and autonomy [12]. |
Exploration of user behavior | There is a need for broader studies to better understand user behavior in chatbot environments, investigate the impact on social relationships, and explore ethical implications for older adults [14]. |
Aspect of Design | Description |
---|---|
Robot Companion Functions |
|
Emotional and Social Support in Chatbots |
|
Frustration and Conversation Limitations |
|
Attractiveness and Empathy in Design |
|
Conversational Stimuli and Feedback |
|
Accessibility and Usability |
|
Personalization of Interaction |
|
Intuitive and Accessible Design |
|
Relevance of Emotional Support |
|
Active Involvement of Older Users |
|
Feedback and User Testing |
|
A Comprehensive Approach to Development |
|
Emotional and Social Perceptions |
|
Technology Adoption and Utility |
|
Barriers |
|
Need | Details and Examples |
---|---|
Company and Social Connection |
|
Emotional Support |
|
Meaningful Occupation |
|
Access to Health and Well-Being Resources |
|
Safe Environment and Personal Care |
|
Technological Adaptability |
|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rodríguez-Martínez, A.; Amezcua-Aguilar, T.; Cortés-Moreno, J.; Jiménez-Delgado, J.J. Qualitative Analysis of Conversational Chatbots to Alleviate Loneliness in Older Adults as a Strategy for Emotional Health. Healthcare 2024, 12, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010062
Rodríguez-Martínez A, Amezcua-Aguilar T, Cortés-Moreno J, Jiménez-Delgado JJ. Qualitative Analysis of Conversational Chatbots to Alleviate Loneliness in Older Adults as a Strategy for Emotional Health. Healthcare. 2024; 12(1):62. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010062
Chicago/Turabian StyleRodríguez-Martínez, Antonia, Teresa Amezcua-Aguilar, Javier Cortés-Moreno, and Juan José Jiménez-Delgado. 2024. "Qualitative Analysis of Conversational Chatbots to Alleviate Loneliness in Older Adults as a Strategy for Emotional Health" Healthcare 12, no. 1: 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010062
APA StyleRodríguez-Martínez, A., Amezcua-Aguilar, T., Cortés-Moreno, J., & Jiménez-Delgado, J. J. (2024). Qualitative Analysis of Conversational Chatbots to Alleviate Loneliness in Older Adults as a Strategy for Emotional Health. Healthcare, 12(1), 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12010062