You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Yuya Shirai1,2,
  • Tadashi Ito1,3 and
  • Yuji Ito4,5
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Katarzyna Domaszewska Reviewer 2: Anonymous

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The comments are included in the attached file.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

First of all, congratulations for the work done, then I will mention a number of changes and recommendations in order to obtain clearer and more accurate information.

- Comments on the abstract:

Avoid the use of abbreviations I the abstract

- Comments on the material and methods:

Numbers from zero to ten must be in letters

 

In general, the changes to be made are minor and at the level of form. At the methodological level, I do not see any serious shortcomings in the study.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors responded to my comments.

Please correct literature 34,37,46,47. The record is inconsistent with the authors' guidelines

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx