The Effects of a Tailored Dietary Education Program for Older Adult Patients on Hemodialysis: A Preliminary Study
1
Yeokgok Medihols Medical Center, 567, Gyeongin-ro, Bucheon-si 14727, Republic of Korea
2
College of Nursing, Gachon University, 191, Hambangmoe-ro, Incheon 21936, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2023, 11(17), 2371; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172371
Submission received: 26 July 2023
/
Revised: 11 August 2023
/
Accepted: 21 August 2023
/
Published: 22 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Nursing)
Abstract
:This study aimed to investigate the overall effects of a tailored dietary education program for older adult patients on hemodialysis (HD) based on self-efficacy theory, dietary knowledge and habits, nutritional intake, and biochemical parameters. A nonequivalent control group pre-test–post-test design was conducted for 8 weeks. The experimental and control groups received a weekly nutritional program and standard nursing care with an additional educational session, respectively. A clinical survey was conducted before and after the intervention. After the intervention, self-efficacy, dietary knowledge, and dietary habits were higher in the experimental group than in the control group. Moreover, carbohydrate, phosphorus, and sodium intake significantly decreased post-intervention in the experimental group but not in the control group. The dietary education program for older HD patients showed positive effects on boosting their self-efficacy, increasing dietary knowledge, improving dietary habits, and decreasing carbohydrate, calcium, phosphorus, and sodium intake.
1. Introduction
Chronic kidney disease is a progressive condition characterized by structural and functional changes in the kidney that may occur due to various underlying conditions [1]. Renal replacement therapies such as hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), or kidney transplantations are life-sustaining treatments for people with kidney failure [1]. According to 2020 statistics, 81%, 3.9%, and 15.1% of patients with chronic renal failure in Korea received HD, PD, and kidney transplantations, respectively [2]. The proportion of older adult patients on HD aged > 65 years has increased every year, rising rapidly from 54.6% in 2019 to 63.7% in 2020 [2].
Individuals with chronic kidney disease, particularly those undergoing maintenance dialysis, are prone to protein-energy wasting. Additionally, dietary education is also important [3]. Moreover, helping patients manage their diet not only positively affects their nutritional status, but also reduces the morbidity and mortality associated with complications such as heart disease [4]. Patients undergoing HD need to balance the etiology that leads to kidney disease (usually hypertension or diabetes) with the high protein and low fluid, sodium, phosphorus, and potassium dietary requirements of renal replacement therapy [5].
Multiple dietary restrictions recommended for older adult patients on HD may lead to a poor dietary status [6]. For the early identification and treatment of patients with a poor dietary status, multiple evaluations of their nutritional condition using various nutritional assessments, including anthropometric, biochemical, and dietary methods, are needed [7].
Adherence to a dietary program is crucial; however, the diet prescribed during HD is difficult to follow, especially for older adults [8]. According to a previous study, after implementing a tailored dietary education program consisting of 30 min for each session for 4 weeks, there was a significant increase in HD patients’ diet knowledge, diet self-care compliance, and self-efficacy [9]. Moreover, self-efficacy was associated with better adherence to the dietary program [10]. Despite the increase in the number of older adult patients receiving HD, dietary interventions based on self-efficacy theory are rare. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a dietary education program based on self-efficacy theory for older adult patients undergoing HD and to evaluate its effects on patients’ self-efficacy, dietary knowledge, dietary habits, nutrient intake, biochemical markers, and anthropometric changes.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
This study was designed with a nonequivalent control group pre-test–post-test design.
2.2. Setting
This study was conducted at a clinic center in Gyeonggi-do, Korea, from January 2022 to March 2022. A recruitment bulletin was posted for older adult patients registered at the clinic who were receiving HD.
2.3. Participants
The inclusion criteria were older adult patients aged ≥ 65 years who had been on HD for 3 months or more, had an arteriovenous fistula, understood the purpose and method of the study and the contents of education, provided written consent to participate, and communicated verbally. The sample size was calculated using the G*power 3.1.9.2 program [11]. The total sample size required was 28 in each group for the independent t-test, α = 0.05, power (1 − β) = 0.90, and effect size of 0.8 (large effect size). Considering the dropout rate was 5–10%, a total of 60 subjects were recruited, including 30 subjects and 30 control subjects. Patients with an instability due to serious heart disease, liver disease, cancer, or a restrictive diet were excluded. Sixty patients were screened and allocated to the experimental and control (n = 30 each) groups according to the dialysis schedule (morning time vs. afternoon time). In the experimental and control groups, dropouts owing to hospitalization (n = 2 and n = 1, respectively) and temporary quarantine for coronavirus infection (n = 3 and n = 4, respectively) occurred. Hence, 25 participants each in the experimental and control groups were included in the final analysis.
2.4. Ethical Considerations
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of G University (1044396-202112-HR-244-01) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. In addition, before starting the study, we obtained permission from the Head of the institution. All participants were provided with a form that explained the background and purpose of the study, survey content, benefits of participation, confidentiality, and right to withdraw from the study. Routine nursing care was provided to the control group during the study period, and a dietary education leaflet and nutrition counseling were provided post-study. All participants were given a small gift before and after the intervention.
2.5. Study Procedure
This study used an 8-week quasi-experimental design. As this study was conducted at one center, there was a risk of diffusion or imitation of treatments in the educational content between the experimental group and control group. Therefore, instead of a random assignment, elderly HD patients receiving dialysis in the afternoon were assigned to the experimental group and patients receiving dialysis in the morning were assigned to the control group. We used a dietary education program based on self-efficacy for older adult patients on HD, which consisted of verbal persuasion, improvements in physical and emotional states, mastery experience, and social modeling (Table 1) [12]. For educational material, we used Microsoft PowerPoint to create interactive presentations to increase the understanding of older adult patients. A large font size and clear photos and pictures were used. Difficult words or medical terms were replaced with commonly used words for easy comprehension by patients. Two head nurses, a chief nurse, a nephrologist, and a nursing professor were consulted on the validity of the program contents, and the CVI (content validity index) was found to be 0.8–1.0 for all items.
The experimental group received individual dietary education for a total of eight sessions, 20–30 min per week. Education was provided during or before and after dialysis; an artificial kidney was used as a teaching aid. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) guidelines were followed by the researchers during all the sessions.
2.6. Instruments
2.6.1. General Characteristics of the Subjects
The participants were interviewed using a structured questionnaire that included sex, age, spouse (yes/no), education level, economic status (high, > 250 million; middle, 1–250 million; low, < 1 million), religion (yes/no), duration of HD, route of HD (arteriovenous fistula/graft fistula), comorbidity (yes/no), medication (yes/no), and experience of diet education (yes/no).
2.6.2. Self-Efficacy
Self-efficacy is defined as an individual’s belief in their ability to exhibit a particular behavior, even in a challenging situation [15]. We used a specific self-efficacy scale for patients on HD [16]. It consisted of a 4-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy (9–36 points; Cronbach’s α = 0.77). In this study, Cronbach’s ⍺ was 0.694.
2.6.3. Hemodialysis Dietary Knowledge
Hemodialysis dietary knowledge of patients on HD was measured with a nutritional knowledge tool, which was developed by Seo [17] and modified by Na [18]. Hemodialysis dietary knowledge comprised 12 questions regarding the rationales and principles of the hemodialysis diet. The total score ranged from 0 to 12, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of the HD diet. In a previous study that surveyed older adult patients on HD, Cronbach’s ⍺ was 0.89 [18]. In this study, Cronbach’s α was 0.73.
2.6.4. Dietary Habits
In this study, dietary habits of the enrolled patients were assessed based on the factors of dietary habits specifically appropriated for patients on HD [17]. It consisted of questions regarding the desired food intake (five items) and general dietary intake (two items). Subsequently, 0 (0–2 days), 1 (3–5 days), and 2 points (6–7 days) were given according to the number of practices for one week. The total score was 14 points; higher scores indicated better dietary habits.
2.6.5. Nutritional Intake
Twenty-four-hour food recall methods were used to obtain data on nutrient intake and food consumption, before and after interventions. The participants were asked to record all food and drink consumed over 1–2 days, and the researchers confirmed all food records. Moreover, the average daily nutrient intake (total calories, carbohydrate, lipid, protein, fiber, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, and magnesium) was calculated using the computer-aided nutrition analysis program (CAN Pro) 5.0 (The Korean Nutrition Society, Seoul, Korea) [19]. According to the dietary guidelines for hemodialysis patients, a daily intake of phosphorus less than 800 mg was defined as appropriate, less than 800–1000 mg as borderline, and more than 1000 mg as excessive intake, while a daily intake of sodium and potassium less than 2000 mg was appropriate, and more than this was excessive intake [20].
2.6.6. Biochemical and Anthropometric Parameters
We reviewed patients’ medical records such as serum potassium (mEq/L) and phosphorus (mg/mL) levels and weight gain between HD sessions. Serum potassium and phosphorus levels were examined as a result of routine tests performed at the beginning of each month immediately before initiating HD. These values were measured by the Department of Laboratory Medicine at the hospital by collecting 6 cc of blood. The weight gain between HD sessions was calculated using a scale by measuring the difference between the weight before and after HD (DW-150, CAS, KOREA).
2.7. Data Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 24.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Cronbach’s α was used to assess the reliability of the scale. The general characteristics of the experimental and control groups were investigated using a t-test or a χ2-test. Self-efficacy, hemodialysis dietary knowledge, dietary habits, nutritional intake, and biochemical and anthropometric parameters were evaluated using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test followed by the t-test or Mann–Whitney U test. Within- or between-group effects of the dietary education program for older adult patients on HD based on self-efficacy theory were evaluated using the difference between pre- and post-intervention values. After the Kolmogorov–Smirnov normality test, pre- and post-intervention data were compared using a t-test or Mann–Whitney U test to assess between-group differences and a paired t-test or Wilcoxon test for within-group changes. The total calorie and energy intake fractions by source ratio were analyzed as means, standard deviations, and percentages. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
3. Results
3.1. Homogeneity Test of Participants’ General Characteristics
In a homogeneity test that was conducted, the two groups did not differ in terms of their general characteristics (Table 2). We also conducted a homogeneity test of pre-intervention variables, including self-efficacy, hemodialysis dietary knowledge, dietary habits, biochemical parameters, and nutritional intake; the two groups did not differ in these variables, except dietary habits (p = 0.018) (Table 3). The pre-intervention dietary habit score was higher in the control group than in the experimental group (Table 3).
3.2. Differences in Self-Efficacy, Hemodialysis Dietary Knowledge, Dietary Habits, Biochemical Parameters, and Nutritional Intake
3.2.1. Group Differences in Self-Efficacy, Hemodialysis Dietary Knowledge, Dietary Habits, Biochemical Parameters, and Nutritional Intake
In the homogeneity test before the intervention, the control group had a higher dietary habit score than that of the experimental group; therefore, we compared the values obtained by subtracting the post- and pre-intervention scores to confirm the effectiveness of the program. Self-efficacy, dietary knowledge, and dietary habits were higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p = 0.001, p = 0.010, and p = 0.003, respectively) (Table 4). In contrast, the intake of carbohydrate, calcium, phosphorus, sodium, and magnesium was lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p = 0.020, p = 0.009, p = 0.014, p = 0.020, and p = 0.015, respectively) (Table 4).
3.2.2. Within-Group Changes in Self-Efficacy, Hemodialysis Dietary Knowledge, Dietary Habits, Biochemical Parameters, and Nutritional Intake before and after Intervention
In the experimental group, self-efficacy, hemodialysis dietary knowledge, and dietary habits increased and serum potassium levels decreased post-intervention (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.015, respectively) (Table 4). In contrast, in the control group, dietary knowledge (p = 0.003) and calcium intake increased post-intervention (p = 0.038) (Table 4).
3.3. Total Calorie Intake and Fraction of Energy Intake by Source
As the estimated energy requirement (EER) differs according to age and sex, the total calorie intake and fraction of energy intake by source according to the age and sex of the subjects are presented in Table 4.
3.4. Differences in Excessive Intake of Phosphorus, Sodium, and Potassium
After the intervention, the rates of excessive intake of phosphorus and sodium were 8.0% and 72% in the experimental group and 32% and 88% in the control group, respectively. Compared with before the experiment, in the experimental group, the excessive intake of phosphorus decreased from 24% to 8% and that of sodium decreased from 84.0% to 72%. However, in the control group, the excessive intake of phosphorus slightly decreased from 36% to 32%, but the rate of sodium intake increased from 72% to 88%. The rate of excessive intake of potassium decreased from 48% to 28% in the experimental group. There was no significant difference between the groups in the rate of excessive intake of potassium before the intervention, but there was a significant difference after the intervention (p = 0.042) (Table 5).
4. Discussion
This study aimed to identify the effects of a dietary education program based on self-efficacy theory for older adult patients on HD that included self-efficacy, hemodialysis dietary knowledge, dietary habits, biochemical parameters, and nutritional intake in Korean older adult patients on HD. The overall energy intake of the participants tended to be insufficient compared with the dietary reference intake for the Korean population [21]. The EER is 2000 kcal for men over 65 years, 1600 kcal for women 65–74 years, and 1500 kcal for those older than 75 years [21]. Among the study population, only women aged > 75 years in the experimental group had adequate energy intake; the rest of the experimental and control groups had lesser energy intake than the EER [21]. Maintenance HD not only induces a catabolic status in patients [22], but also causes loss of appetite, loss of serum albumin-induced HD, comorbid conditions, and enhanced protein degradation that is observed with aging [23]; a poor nutritional status and protein-energy wasting are common among patients on maintenance HD [24]. Older adult patients on HD commonly have comorbidities. Additionally, the HD diet is difficult to follow, especially for older adults [8]. Therefore, it is important to develop individualized nutritional intervention programs.
The recommended energy ratios for HD patients are 50%, 15%, and 35% for carbohydrate, protein, and fat, respectively [25]. However, the energy ratios of the experimental and control groups in the present study were greater than 60%, 12–15%, and 10–20%, respectively; for instance, the carbohydrate intake was higher and the fat intake was lower than the recommended ratio. Fat intake is important for the maintenance of total energy intake and according to a previous study, the serum cholesterol level and mortality risk among patients on HD showed a U-shaped curve [7]. In this dietary education program, customized counseling was provided to the participants based on pre-test data so that they could meet the appropriate energy intake fraction.
In the present study, the experimental group had significantly higher self-efficacy, dietary knowledge, and dietary habits and significantly lower carbohydrate, calcium, phosphorus, and sodium intake post-intervention compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in the blood chemistry tests between the groups; however, the serum potassium level in the experimental group was significantly lower post-intervention than pre-intervention. The program showed positive effects, probably because it was designed based on self-efficacy, relying on behavioral changes induced by building mastery experiences, emphasizing past successes, social modeling, improving emotional states, and verbal persuasion. These results were consistent with a previous study, which applied sodium reduction to the nutritional intervention program for patients on HD [8]. Dietary interventions designed to improve self-efficacy also positively affected the dietary sodium density reduction, especially in groups with low baseline self-efficacy [8]. Self-efficacy is a crucial mediator between knowledge and self-care [26]; therefore, strategies to increase self-efficacy are essential for the promotion of adherence to dietary guidelines among vulnerable older adult populations.
We found that sodium and phosphorus intake significantly decreased in the experimental group compared with those in the control group after the program. According to a previous study, a high phosphorus intake is known to increase the mortality rate among patients on HD [27]. Moreover, an excessive sodium intake may affect the elevation of blood pressure in these patients [28]. Therefore, the present program effectively reduced sodium and phosphorus intake in patients on HD. The positive changes in nutrient intake despite the relatively short intervention period (8 weeks) may have been owing to the application of personalized interventions.
A high potassium intake is known to increase the mortality rate of patients on HD [27]; therefore, a nutritional intervention program that could reduce the potassium intake in HD patients is very crucial. In the present study, no significant difference was noted between the serum potassium levels in the experimental and control groups. However, the dietary potassium intake and serum potassium level decreased in the experimental group post-intervention. Koreans tend to prefer food containing large amounts of potassium and it is difficult to reduce potassium intake in a short period. Therefore, it is necessary to educate patients on changing cooking methods for food containing high levels of potassium [29]. As potassium is a water-soluble substance, it can be dissolved in water by peeling and boiling vegetables rather than baking or frying them [30]. A long-term intervention is needed to modify the choice of low-potassium-containing food and cooking methods.
Serum phosphorus levels and weight gains of the participants did not significantly change in either the experimental or control groups. However, according to a previous study, a high phosphorus intake increased the mortality rate of patients on HD, despite adjusting for serum phosphorus levels and potassium and protein intake [27]. In our study, there was no significant change in the weight of the participants before and after HD initiation. This could be attributed to the fact that the study was conducted in winter; hence, the amount of exercise may have decreased among older adults, particularly in those who were chronically ill who reduced outdoor activities due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Our study had several limitations. First, this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, owing to which the dropout rate was higher than expected. Second, this study was conducted at only one clinic, so our results cannot be generalized to all older adult patients on HD in Korea.
5. Conclusions
In conclusion, a dietary education program for older adult patients on HD based on self-efficacy theory positively affected self-efficacy and dietary knowledge, improved dietary habits, and decreased carbohydrate, calcium, phosphorus, and sodium intake among these patients. Future research should focus on the long-term effects of dietary education programs based on self-efficacy in older adult patients undergoing HD.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, G.P. and S.C.; methodology, G.P.; software, G.P.; validation, S.C. formal analysis, G.P.; investigation, G.P.; resources, G.P.; data curation, S.C.; writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, G.P. and S.C.; visualization, G.P. and S.C.; supervision, S.C.; project administration, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of G University (1044396-202112-HR-244-01) and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available to protect the participants, but are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Acknowledgments
This article is based on part of the first author’s Master’s thesis from Gachon University.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Levey, A.S.; Coresh, J. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet 2012, 379, 165–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The Korean Society of Nephrology. Trends in Epidemiologic Characteristics of End-Stage Renal Disease from 2020 KORDS (Korean Renal Data System); The Korean Society of Nephrology. 2020. Available online: https://ksn.or.kr/bbs/index.php?code=report (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Chan, W. Chronic Kidney Disease and Nutrition Support. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2021, 36, 312–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, G.S. A study on characteristics of cognitive function of hemodialysis patients. Health Nurs. 2002, 14, 48–61. [Google Scholar]
- Murtagh, F.E.; Addington-Hall, J.; Higginson, I.J. The prevalence of symptoms in end-stage renal disease: A systematic review. Adv. Chronic Kidney Dis. 2007, 14, 82–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Martins, A.M.; Bello Moreira, A.S.; Canella, D.S.; Rodrigues, J.; Santin, F.; Wanderley, B.; Lourenço, R.A.; Avesani, C.M. Elderly patients on hemodialysis have worse dietary quality and higher consumption of ultraprocessed food than elderly without chronic kidney disease. Nutrition 2017, 41, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kanda, E.; Kato, A.; Masakane, I.; Kanno, Y. A new nutritional risk index for predicting mortality in hemodialysis patients: Nationwide cohort study. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hu, L.; St-Jules, D.E.; Popp, C.J.; Sevick, M.A. Determinants and the role of self-efficacy in a sodium-reduction trial in hemodialysis patients. J. Ren. Nutr. 2019, 29, 328–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, S.; Choi, Y. The effects of tailored dietary education among role failure hemodialysis patients on self-care compliance, self-efficacy and physiologic indices. Korean J. Rehabil. Nurs. 2021, 24, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jafari, M.; Mannani, R.; Zarea, K. The association between self-concept and self-efficacy in patients under treatment by hemodialysis. Jundishapur J. Chronic Dis. Care 2015, 4, e27222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Faul, F.; Erdfelder, E.; Lang, A.G.; Buchner, A. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 2007, 39, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Glanz, K.; Rimer, B.K.; Viswanath, K. Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4th ed.; John Wiley & Sons: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, E.M. Diet for Hemodialysis Patients. The Korean Society of Nephrology. 2005. Available online: https://ksn.or.kr/journal/list.php?page=2&kind=701528733 (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Kim, E.M. Diet for Diabetic Dialysis Patients; Dietary Management of Chronic Renal Failure and Hemodialysis Patients with Diabetes. The Korean Society of Nephrology. 2006. Available online: https://ksn.or.kr/journal/list.php?page=1&kind=701528733 (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 191–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, J.H. An Effect of Guided Imagery Applied to Hemodialysis Patients. Ph.D. Thesis, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Seo, H.J. A Study on Effect of Nutrition Education in Hemodialysis Patient. Master’s Thesis, Changwon National University, Changwon-si, Republic of Korea, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Na, E.J. The Effect of Nutritional Education on Hyperphosphatemic End-Stage Renal Failure Patients. Ph.D. Thesis, Chungnam National University , Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- The Korean Nutrition Society. Computer Aided Nutritional Analysis Program. 2022. Available online: https://www.kns.or.kr/can/CanPro5n.asp (accessed on 1 February 2022).
- The Korean Dietetic Association. Kidney Disease Management. Available online: https://www.dietitian.or.kr/work/business/kb_c_kidney_dialysis01.do (accessed on 7 August 2023).
- Ministry of Health and Welfare; The Korean Nutrition Society. Dietary Reference Intakes for Koreans. 2020. Available online: https://www.kns.or.kr (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Clinical practice guidelines for nutrition in chronic renal failure. K/DOQI, National Kidney Foundation. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2000, 35 (Suppl. 2), S17–S104. [CrossRef]
- Friedman, A.N.; Fadem, S.Z. Reassessment of albumin as a nutritional marker in kidney disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 21, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kistler, B.M.; Benner, D.; Burrowes, J.D.; Campbell, K.L.; Fouque, D.; Garibotto, G.; Kopple, J.D.; Kovesdy, C.P.; Rhee, C.M.; Steiber, A.; et al. Eating during hemodialysis treatment: A consensus statement from the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism. J. Ren. Nutr. 2018, 28, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- The Korean Society for Dialysis Therapy. Diet for Patients with Chronic Renal Failure. Available online: http://www.e-kda.org/blood/sub01_6.html (accessed on 7 July 2022).
- Wu, S.F.; Hsieh, N.C.; Lin, L.J.; Tsai, J.M. Prediction of self-care behaviour on the basis of knowledge about chronic kidney disease using self-efficacy as a mediator. J. Clin. Nurs. 2016, 25, 2609–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Noori, N.; Kalantar-Zadeh, K.; Kovesdy, C.P.; Bross, R.; Benner, D.; Kopple, J.D. Association of dietary phosphorus intake and phosphorus to protein ratio with mortality in hemodialysis patients. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2010, 5, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Georgianos, P.I.; Agarwal, R. Blood pressure control in conventional hemodialysis. Semin. Dial. 2018, 31, 557–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Woo, H.J.; Lee, Y.J.; Oh, I.H.; Lee, C.H.; Lee, S.S. Association of food intake with serum levels of phosphorus and potassium in hemodialysis patients. J. Nutr. Health 2014, 47, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Korean Dietetic Association. Food Exchange List for Patients with Kidney Failure; Korean Dietetic Association: Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1997. [Google Scholar]
Table 1.
Dietary education program based on self-efficacy theory for older adult patients undergoing hemodialysis.
Table 1.
Dietary education program based on self-efficacy theory for older adult patients undergoing hemodialysis.
| Session | Source of Self-Efficacy | Contents of the Intervention |
|---|---|---|
| 0 |
| |
| 1 | Verbal persuasion |
|
| Improving emotional states |
| |
| 2 | Verbal persuasion |
|
| 3 | Verbal persuasion |
|
| Improving emotional states |
| |
| Mastery experience |
| |
| 4 | Verbal persuasion | |
| Mastery experience |
| |
| 5 | Verbal persuasion |
|
| Mastery experience |
| |
| 6 | Verbal persuasion | |
| Mastery experience |
| |
| 7 | Verbal persuasion |
|
| Mastery experience |
| |
| 8 | Improving physical and emotional states |
|
| Mastery experience |
| |
| Social modeling |
|
Table 2.
Homogeneity test of participants’ general characteristics.
| Variables | Category | Exp. (n = 25) N (%) | Con. (n = 25) N (%) | χ2 | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | Male | 12 (44.4) | 15 (55.6) | 0.725 | 0.395 |
| Age (years) | 65–74 | 14 (48.3) | 15 (51.7) | 0.082 | 0.774 |
| ≥75 | 11 (52.4) | 10 (47.6) | |||
| Spouse | Yes | 19 (48.7) | 20 (51.3) | 0.117 | 0.733 |
| No | 6 (54.5) | 5 (45.5) | |||
| Education level (years) | Less than middle school | 15 (55.6) | 12 (44.4) | 0.725 | 0.395 |
| High school graduate or higher | 10 (43.5) | 13 (56.5) | |||
| Economic status | High | 6 (60.0) | 4 (40.0) | 2.133 | 0.344 |
| Middle | 16 (53.3) | 14 (46.7) | |||
| Low | 3 (30.0) | 7 (70.0) | |||
| Religion | Yes | 13 (37.1) | 22 (62.9) | 7.714 | 0.005 |
| No | 12 (80.0) | 3 (20.0) | |||
| Duration of HD (years) | >5 | 7 (53.8) | 6 (46.2) | 0.331 | 0.848 |
| 5–10 | 5 (55.6) | 4 (44.4) | |||
| <10 | 13 (46.4) | 15 (53.6) | |||
| Route of HD | AVF | 20 (50.0) | 20 (50.0) | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| Graft fistula | 5 (50.0) | 5 (50.0) | |||
| Comorbidity | Yes | 24 (50.0) | 24 (50.0) | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| No | 1 (50.0) | 1 (50.0) | |||
| Medication | Yes | 25 (51.0) | 24 (49.0) | 1.02 | 0.312 |
| No | 0 (0.0) | 1 (100.0) | |||
| Smoking | Yes | 2 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 2.083 | 0.245 |
| No | 23 (47.9) | 25 (52.1) | |||
| Drinking | Yes | 4 (50.0) | 4 (50.0) | 0.000 | 0.649 |
| No | 21 (50.0) | 21 (50.0) | |||
| Experience of diet education | Yes | 3 (27.3) | 8 (72.7) | 2.914 | 0.088 |
| No | 22 (56.4) | 17 (43.6) |
Exp: experimental group; Con: control group; HD: hemodialysis; AVF: arteriovenous fistula.
Table 3.
Homogeneity test of self-efficacy, hemodialysis dietary knowledge, dietary habits, biochemical parameters, and nutritional intake.
Table 3.
Homogeneity test of self-efficacy, hemodialysis dietary knowledge, dietary habits, biochemical parameters, and nutritional intake.
| Variable | Unit | Exp. (n = 25) Mean (SD) | Con. (n = 25) Mean (SD) | t | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-efficacy | 25.48 (4.43) | 25.48 (5.95) | 288.00 * | 0.633 | |
| Dietary knowledge | 5.84 (2.84) | 7.00 (2.84) | −1.444 | 0.155 | |
| Dietary habits | 9.60 (1.68) | 10.80 (1.78) | −2.449 | 0.018 | |
| Biochemical parameters (serum level) | |||||
| Potassium | mEq/L | 5.11 (0.78) | 5.46 (0.70) | −1.681 | 0.099 |
| Phosphorus | mg/ml | 4.14 (1.18) | 4.47 (1.20) | −0.998 | 0.323 |
| Weight gain | kg | 2.56 (0.96) | 2.74 (2.22) | 300.00 * | 0.808 |
| Nutrient intake | |||||
| Calories | kcal | 1510.51 (337.21) | 1559.07 (475.87) | −0.416 | 0.679 |
| Carbohydrate | g | 249.54 (56.95) | 241.88 (76.75) | 0.401 | 0.690 |
| Lipid | g | 30.46 (16.28) | 37.70 (17.72) | 230.00 * | 0.109 |
| Protein | g | 51.98 (13.15) | 54.75 (20.61) | −0.567 | 0.573 |
| Fiber | g | 17.43 (6.14) | 18.78 (7.44) | −0.701 | 0.487 |
| Calcium | mg | 408.97 (209.69) | 378.57 (201.53) | 0.523 | 0.604 |
| Phosphorus | mg | 827.85 (224.09) | 840.84 (322.46) | −0.165 | 0.869 |
| Sodium | mg | 3091.39 (1186.96) | 3133.25 (1451.17) | −0.112 | 0.912 |
| Potassium | mg | 1973.89 (648.10) | 2158.75 (868.82) | −0.853 | 0.398 |
| Magnesium | mg | 76.24 (42.88) | 96.51 (66.05) | 259.00 * | 0.299 |
Exp: experimental group; Con: control group; SD: standard deviation; * Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 4.
Differences in self-efficacy, hemodialysis dietary knowledge, dietary habits, biochemical parameters, and nutritional intake.
Table 4.
Differences in self-efficacy, hemodialysis dietary knowledge, dietary habits, biochemical parameters, and nutritional intake.
| Variable | Group | Pre-Test | Post-Test | Paired t or z | p-Value | Differences (Pre–Post) | t or U | p-Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | ||||||
| Self-efficacy | Exp. | 25.48 (4.43) | 29.20 (4.05) | −3.647 † | < 0.001 | −3.72 (3.82) | −3.376 | 0.001 |
| Con. | 25.48 (5.95) | 24.84 (6.61) | −0.686 † | 0.493 | 0.64 (5.20) | |||
| Dietary knowledge | Exp. | 5.84 (2.84) | 8.96 (1.88) | −3.835 † | < 0.001 | −3.12 (2.64) | 180.50 * | 0.010 |
| Con. | 7.00 (2.84) | 8.32 (2.15) | −2.942 † | 0.003 | −1.32 (1.75) | |||
| Dietary habits | Exp. | 9.60 (1.68) | 11.24 (1.23) | −4.389 | < 0.001 | −1.64 (1.87) | 164.00 * | 0.003 |
| Con. | 10.80 (1.78) | 10.76 (1.23) | 0.102 | 0.920 | 0.04 (1.97) | |||
| Serum level | ||||||||
| Potassium | Exp. | 5.11 (0.78) | 4.77 (0.66) | 2.634 | 0.015 | 0.34 (0.65) | 0.782 | 0.439 |
| Con. | 5.46 (0.70) | 5.30 (0.85) | 0.889 | 0.383 | 0.16 (0.92) | |||
| Phosphorus | Exp. | 4.14 (1.18) | 4.58 (0.96) | −1.782 | 0.087 | 0.44 (1.23) | 0.099 | 0.921 |
| Con. | 4.47 (1.20) | 4.88 (.088) | −1.517 | 0.142 | 0.40 (1.33) | |||
| Weight gain | Exp. | 2.56 (0.96) | 2.47 (1.08) | −0.592 † | 0.554 | 0.08 (0.52) | −1.015 | 0.315 |
| Con. | 2.74 (2.22) | 2.26 (0.76) | −0.943 † | 0.346 | 0.49 (1.91) | |||
| Nutrient intake | ||||||||
| Calories | Exp. | 1510.51 (337.21) | 1402.08 (297.53) | −1.117 † | 0.264 | 108.43 (441.96) | 247.00 * | 0.204 |
| Con. | 1559.07 (475.87) | 1669.15 (606.08) | −0.767 † | 0.443 | −110.08 (602.36) | |||
| Carbohydrate | Exp. | 249.54 (56.95) | 222.69 (48.46) | 1.910 | 0.068 | 26.85 (70.27) | 193.00 * | 0.020 |
| Con. | 241.88 (76.75) | 254.70 (75.29) | −0.724 | 0.476 | −12.82 (88.57) | |||
| Lipid | Exp. | 30.46 (16.28) | 32.11 (14.71) | −1.440 † | 0.150 | −1.64 (20.75) | 263.00* | 0.337 |
| Con. | 37.70 (17.72) | 40.63 (22.66) | −0.202 † | 0.840 | −2.93 (20.82) | |||
| Protein | Exp. | 51.98 (13.15) | 48.13 (13.33) | 1.040 | 0.309 | 3.85 (18.50) | 1.942 | 0.058 |
| Con. | 54.75 (20.61) | 63.37 (28.55) | −1.643 | 0.114 | −8.62 (26.23) | |||
| Fiber | Exp. | 17.43 (6.14) | 16.00 (4.18) | 0.977 | 0.338 | 1.43 (7.32) | 1.382 | 0.173 |
| Con. | 18.78 (7.44) | 20.46 (9.91) | −0.983 | 0.335 | −1.68 (8.57) | |||
| Calcium | Exp. | 408.97 (209.69) | 317.53 (151.32) | 1.612 | 0.120 | 91.45 (283.67) | 2.702 | 0.009 |
| Con. | 378.57 (201.53) | 509.45 (295.84) | −2.196 | 0.038 | −130.88 (297.94) | |||
| Phosphorus | Exp. | 827.85 (224.09) | 710.00 (208.75) | 1.786 | 0.087 | 117.86 (330.03) | 2.542 | 0.014 |
| Con. | 840.84 (322.46) | 976.57 (440.11) | −1.815 | 0.082 | −135.73 (373.88) | |||
| Sodium | Exp. | 3091.39 (1186.96) | 2604.12 (804.60) | −1.359 † | 0.174 | 487.26 (1522.85) | 193.00 * | 0.020 |
| Con. | 3133.25 (1451.17) | 3811.89 (1852.60) | −1.951 † | 0.051 | −678.64 (1520.42) | |||
| Potassium | Exp. | 1973.89 (648.10) | 1688.44 (577.00) | 1.522 | 0.141 | 1935.29 (647.72) | −0.676 | 0.503 |
| Con. | 2158.75 (868.82) | 2301.12 (1027.20) | −0.898 | 0.378 | 2081.90 (870.42) | |||
| Magnesium | Exp. | 76.24 (42.88) | 76.84 (41.56) | −0.040 † | 0.968 | −1612.20 (589.67) | 2.546 | 0.015 |
| Con. | 96.51 (66.05) | 113.01 (55.30) | −1.224 † | 0.221 | −2204.60 (1002.99) | |||
Exp: experimental group; Con: control group; SD: standard deviation; * Mann–Whitney U test; † Wilcoxon test.
Table 5.
Differences in excessive intake of phosphorus, sodium, and potassium.
| Variable | Category | Pre-Test | Post-Test | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exp. (n = 25) N (%) | Con. (n = 25) N (%) | χ2 | p-Value | Exp. (n = 25) N (%) | Con. (n = 25) N (%) | χ2 | p-Value | ||
| Phosphorus | Appropriate | 13 (52.0) | 13 (52.0) | 1.600 | 0.449 | 15 (60.0) | 11 (44.0) | 4.501 | 0.105 |
| Borderline | 6 (24.0) | 3 (12.0) | 8 (32.0) | 6 (24.0) | |||||
| Excess | 6 (24.0) | 9 (36.0) | 2 (8.0) | 8 (32.0) | |||||
| Sodium | Appropriate | 4 (16.0) | 7 (28.0) | 1.049 | 0.248 | 7 (28.0) | 3 (12.0) | 2.000 | 0.145 |
| Excess | 21 (84.0) | 18 (72.0) | 18 (72.0) | 22 (88.0) | |||||
| Potassium | Appropriate | 13 (52.0) | 10 (40.0) | 0.725 | 0.285 | 18 (72.0) | 11 (44.0) | 4.023 | 0.042 |
| Excess | 12 (48.0) | 15 (60.0) | 7 (28.0) | 14 (56.0) | |||||
Exp: experimental group; Con: control group.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Park, G.; Choi, S. The Effects of a Tailored Dietary Education Program for Older Adult Patients on Hemodialysis: A Preliminary Study. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172371
AMA Style
Park G, Choi S. The Effects of a Tailored Dietary Education Program for Older Adult Patients on Hemodialysis: A Preliminary Study. Healthcare. 2023; 11(17):2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172371
Chicago/Turabian StylePark, Gayoung, and Seunghye Choi. 2023. "The Effects of a Tailored Dietary Education Program for Older Adult Patients on Hemodialysis: A Preliminary Study" Healthcare 11, no. 17: 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11172371
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
