Next Article in Journal
Impact of Daycare Service Interruption during COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical and Mental Functions and Nutrition in Older People with Dementia
Previous Article in Journal
Association between Locomotive Syndrome and Physical Activity in Long-Term Inpatients of Psychiatric Care Wards in Japan: A Preliminary Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 10
Issue 9
10.3390/healthcare10091742
Review Report
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Radiography Managers’ Perspectives on the Strategies to Mitigate Disruptive Behaviours: A Qualitative Exploratory Study

Healthcare 2022, 10(9), 1742; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091742
by Bornface Chinene 1,*, Pauline Busisiwe Nkosi 2 and Maureen Nokuthula Sibiya 3
Reviewer 1:
Minerva Cruz
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Healthcare 2022, 10(9), 1742; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10091742
Submission received: 13 July 2022 / Revised: 1 September 2022 / Accepted: 7 September 2022 / Published: 11 September 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

(1) You provided specific examples about what could be disruptive behavior. Just move those examples earlier in the manuscript. I was wondering what specific examples are those until I read them later in the manuscript.

(2) You said 4 open ended questions. Only 3 are stated, where is #4?

(3) Must explain more about NVivo for someone who does not know about the program (I know about it but not everyone does)

(4) See line #85 of your manuscript. It is confusing if you are interviewing managers (e.g. supervisors). Then line #86 you said RMS. Then line 394 you said radiography managers. It is confusing. Be consistent throughout the manuscript.

(5) Great you included a table with themes from the interview data. Perhaps a small table with demographics is helpful too.

(6) Good you did not identify the people you interviewed and included each in parenthesis.

(7) I love that portion about communication (line 351 and beyond). Communication is very important in these issues.

I enjoyed reading this manuscript! It is interesting and well done.

Author Response

Find my responses attached below

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I read a very interesting and original study entitled "RADIOGRAPHY MANAGERS' PERSPECTIVES ON THE STRATEGIES TO MITIGATE DISRUPTIVE BEHAVIOURS: A QUALITATIVE EXPLORATORY STUDY".

First of all, congratulations to the authors for the excellent manuscript they have submitted. I believe that this paper should be published after minor revision.

Here are my observations:

I would ask the authors not to use abbreviations in the abstract (specifically in line 14 abbreviation DB).

In the discussion it would be appropriate for the authors to make suggestions for future research.

I believe that a paragraph should be added at the end of the discussion with the limitations of the study.

Author Response

See attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop