Content Analysis of YouTube Videos That Demonstrate Panoramic Radiography
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Rushton, V.; Horner, K.; Worthington, H. Screening panoramic radiology of adults in general dental practice: Radiological findings. Br. Dent. J. 2001, 190, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Rushton, V.; Horner, K.; Worthington, H. Aspects of panoramic radiography in general dental practice. Br. Dent. J. 1999, 186, 342–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeung, A.W.K.; Mozos, I. The innovative and sustainable use of dental panoramic radiographs for the detection of osteoporosis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeung, A.W.K.; Wong, N.S.M. Medial Sigmoid Depression of the Mandibular Ramus as a Lesion-Mimicking Anatomical Variation: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kon, H.; Botelho, M.G.; Bridges, S.; Leung, K.C.M. The impact of complete denture making instructional videos on self-directed learning of clinical skills. J. Prosthodont. Res. 2015, 59, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botelho, M.G.; Gao, X.; Jagannathan, N. A qualitative analysis of students’ perceptions of videos to support learning in a psychomotor skills course. Eur. J. Dent. Educ. 2019, 23, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Botelho, M.G. Evaluation of student use of videos to support learning in a simulation laboratory course: A perception and analytics approach. J. Investig. Clin. Dent. 2019, 10, e12453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaval, M.E.; Demirci, G.K.; Atesci, A.A.; Sarsar, F.; Dindaroğlu, F.; Güneri, P.; Caliskan, M.K. YouTube™ as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: Quality and content analysis. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2022, 161, 104732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aldallal, S.; Yates, J.; Ajrash, M. Use of YouTube™ as a self-directed learning resource in oral surgery among undergraduate dental students: A cross-sectional descriptive study. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 57, 1049–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, M.W.; Kalaichelvan, A.; Liebman, L.S.; Burns, L.E. Exploring predoctoral dental student use of YouTube as a learning tool for clinical endodontic procedures. J. Dent. Educ. 2022, 86, 726–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koya, K.D.; Bhatia, K.R.; Hsu, J.T.; Bhatia, A.C. YouTube and the expanding role of videos in dermatologic surgery education. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 2012, 31, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barry, D.S.; Marzouk, F.; Chulak-Oglu, K.; Bennett, D.; Tierney, P.; O’Keeffe, G.W. Anatomy education for the YouTube generation. Anat. Sci. Educ. 2016, 9, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rapp, A.K.; Healy, M.G.; Charlton, M.E.; Keith, J.N.; Rosenbaum, M.E.; Kapadia, M.R. YouTube is the most frequently used educational video source for surgical preparation. J. Surg. Educ. 2016, 73, 1072–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeung, A.W.K.; Parvanov, E.D.; Hribersek, M.; Eibensteiner, F.; Klager, E.; Kletecka-Pulker, M.; Rössler, B.; Schebesta, K.; Willschke, H.; Atanasov, A.G. Digital Teaching in Medical Education: Scientific Literature Landscape Review. JMIR Med. Educ. 2022, 8, e32747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeung, A.W.K.; Tosevska, A.; Klager, E.; Eibensteiner, F.; Tsagkaris, C.; Parvanov, E.D.; Nawaz, F.A.; Völkl-Kernstock, S.; Schaden, E.; Kletecka-Pulker, M. Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022, 24, e28152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chytas, D. Use of social media in anatomy education: A narrative review of the literature. Ann. Anat.-Anat. Anz. 2019, 221, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- YouTube Creators. How YouTube Search Works. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTrLniP5tSQ (accessed on 7 June 2022).
- Burns, L.E.; Abbassi, E.; Qian, X.; Mecham, A.; Simeteys, P.; Mays, K.A. YouTube use among dental students for learning clinical procedures: A multi-institutional study. J. Dent. Educ. 2020, 84, 1151–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukhopadhyay, S.; Kruger, E.; Tennant, M. YouTube: A new way of supplementing traditional methods in dental education. J. Dent. Educ. 2014, 78, 1568–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ilhan, B.; Bayrakdar, İ.S.; Orhan, K. Dental radiographic procedures during COVID-19 outbreak and normalization period: Recommendations on infection control. Oral Radiol. 2020, 36, 395–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, M.-C.; Bae, S.; Kim, J.Y.; Park, S.Y.; Lim, J.S.; Sung, M.; Kim, S.-H. Effectiveness of surgical, KF94, and N95 respirator masks in blocking SARS-CoV-2: A controlled comparison in 7 patients. Infect. Dis. 2020, 52, 908–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- White, S.C.; Heslop, E.W.; Hollender, L.G.; Mosier, K.M.; Ruprecht, A.; Shrout, M.K. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 2001, 91, 498–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection of Patients in Dental Radiology. Available online: https://www.iaea.org/resources/rpop/health-professionals/dentistry/patients#2 (accessed on 20 May 2022).
- European Commission. Radiation Protection 136: European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/136.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2022).
- Faculty of General Dental Practice United Kingdom. Guidance Notes for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment 2nd Edition. Available online: https://www.rqia.org.uk/RQIA/files/44/449bdd1c-ccb0-4322-b0df-616a0de88fe4.pdf (accessed on 20 May 2022).
- Hayashi, T.; Arai, Y.; Chikui, T.; Hayashi-Sakai, S.; Honda, K.; Indo, H.; Kawai, T.; Kobayashi, K.; Murakami, S.; Nagasawa, M. Clinical guidelines for dental cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Radiol. 2018, 34, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeung, A.W.K. The “As Low As Reasonably Achievable” (ALARA) principle: A brief historical overview and a bibliometric analysis of the most cited publications. Radioprotection 2019, 54, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Procedure | No. of Videos | % (of 40) |
---|---|---|
(A) Image receptor type | ||
Digital | 38 | 95.0 |
Film | 2 | 5.0 |
(B1) Patient age | ||
Adult | 35 | 87.5 |
Child | 4 | 10.0 |
Teenager | 1 | 2.5 |
(B2) Patient type | ||
Real patient | 36 | 90.0 |
Animation | 4 | 10.0 |
Phantom head | 0 | 0 |
(C1) Explicitly removed or instructed to remove metallic objects from head and neck | ||
Yes | 22 | 55.0 |
No | 18 | 45.0 |
(C2) Explain the procedure | ||
Yes | 38 | 95.0 |
No | 2 | 5.0 |
(C3) Patient wearing lead apron | ||
Yes | 28 | 70.0 |
No | 11 | 27.5 |
N/A | 1 | 2.5 |
(D1) Selected imaging parameters (mode, body size, etc.) | ||
Yes | 21 | 52.5 |
No | 19 | 47.5 |
(D2) Used plastic barrier to cover the bite-peg | ||
Yes | 27 | 67.5 |
No | 10 | 25.0 |
N/A | 3 | 7.5 |
Procedure | No. of Videos | % (of 40) |
---|---|---|
(1) Straight cervical spine | ||
Yes | 38 | 95.0 |
No | 2 | 5.0 |
(2) Holding handles | ||
Yes | 39 | 92.5 |
N/A | 1 | 2.5 |
(3) Incisors biting edge-to-edge onto the bite-peg | ||
Yes | 38 | 95.0 |
N/A | 2 | 5.0 |
(4) Chin on chin rest | ||
Yes | 37 | 92.5 |
N/A | 3 | 7.5 |
(5) Using head clamps | ||
Yes | 39 | 97.5 |
No | 1 | 2.5 |
(6) Using beam marker to align mid-sagittal plane | ||
Yes | 33 | 82.5 |
No | 3 | 7.5 |
N/A | 4 | 10.0 |
(7) Using beam marker to align Frankfort plane | ||
Yes | 31 | 77.5 |
No | 5 | 12.5 |
N/A | 4 | 10.0 |
(8) Using beam marker to align canine region | ||
Yes | 26 | 65.0 |
No | 9 | 22.5 |
N/A | 5 | 12.5 |
(9) Instructed to press tongue onto the hard palate | ||
Yes | 24 | 60.0 |
No | 15 | 37.5 |
N/A | 1 | 2.5 |
Procedure | No. of Videos | % (of 40) |
---|---|---|
(1) Operator position | ||
Totally shielded with door closed | 0 | 0 |
Shielded position with door opened (or no scene showing door closure) | 28 | 70.0 |
Inside the room with lead apron | 1 | 2.5 |
Totally unprotected | 1 | 2.5 |
N/A | 10 | 25.0 |
(2) Wearing head cap | ||
Yes | 5 | 12.5 |
No | 25 | 62.5 |
N/A | 10 | 25.0 |
(3) Wearing eye protection or face shield | ||
Yes | 5 | 12.5 |
No | 25 | 62.5 |
N/A | 10 | 25.0 |
(4) Wearing surgical mask | ||
Yes | 11 | 27.5 |
No | 19 | 47.5 |
N/A | 10 | 25.0 |
(5) Wearing gloves | ||
Yes | 18 | 45.0 |
No | 17 | 42.5 |
N/A | 5 | 12.5 |
(6) Body wear | ||
Disposable gown | 6 | 15.0 |
Clinical uniform | 16 | 40.0 |
Lab coat | 6 | 15.0 |
Casual wear | 4 | 10.0 |
N/A | 8 | 20.0 |
Metric | Mean ± SD | Min; Max |
---|---|---|
View count | 61,318 ± 288,383 | 26; 1,835,204 |
Comment count | 11.3 ± 33.1 | 0; 178 |
Like count | 173.3 ± 601.1 | 0; 3800 |
Duration (s) | 381.5 ± 409.7 | 67; 1979 |
Channel subscriber count | 15,242 ± 50,885 | 2; 276,000 |
Age of video (years) | 4.9 ± 3.2 | 0.3; 12.8 |
Metric | Comment Count | Like Count | Duration (s) | Channel Subscriber Count | Video Age (Years) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
View count | 0.178 (p = 0.330) | 0.985 (p < 0.001) | −0.050 (p = 0.760) | 0.331 (p = 0.052) | 0.147 (p = 0.365) |
Comment count | 0.666 (p < 0.001) | 0.230 (p = 0.206) | 0.332 (p = 0.073) | −0.280 (p = 0.121) | |
Like count | −0.038 (p = 0.816) | 0.418 (p = 0.012) | 0.086 (p = 0.596) | ||
Duration (s) | 0.077 (p = 0.662) | 0.096 (p = 0.558) | |||
Channel subscriber count | −0.188 (p = 0.280) |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Grillon, M.; Yeung, A.W.K. Content Analysis of YouTube Videos That Demonstrate Panoramic Radiography. Healthcare 2022, 10, 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061093
Grillon M, Yeung AWK. Content Analysis of YouTube Videos That Demonstrate Panoramic Radiography. Healthcare. 2022; 10(6):1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061093
Chicago/Turabian StyleGrillon, Marlene, and Andy Wai Kan Yeung. 2022. "Content Analysis of YouTube Videos That Demonstrate Panoramic Radiography" Healthcare 10, no. 6: 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061093
APA StyleGrillon, M., & Yeung, A. W. K. (2022). Content Analysis of YouTube Videos That Demonstrate Panoramic Radiography. Healthcare, 10(6), 1093. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10061093