Study on the Mechanism of Wage Growth in China’s Logistics Industry: The Roles of Government and Market
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Research Framework and Hypothesis
2.1. Research Framework
- The roles of government and market. As far as the government is concerned, in addition to conventional monetary and fiscal policies, it has also provided inclusive financial policies, transport infrastructure, etc., and is also actively promoting the transformation and upgrading of the industrial structure. As far as the logistics market is concerned, it needs a large number of logistics personnel, whether it is low- skilled workers or highly skilled workers, as this phenomenon stems from two aspects: first, the scale of the freight market continues to expand; second, the development of intelligent logistics is thriving. Both the government’s macro-control and the market’s free regulation are playing their respective roles. China’s economic resilience is still strong, and both the size and the speed of development are good, but this does not mean that the real wage level of all sectors can keep up with the speed of economic growth. Therefore, the factors related to government and market warrant a systematic analysis and consideration in our study. In the construction of the econometric model, policy tools, economic and scale variables will be used, such as inclusive finance, transport infrastructure, economic growth increment, logistics vehicles scale, Internet access scale and other variables; each variable can reflect its significance and value from the perspective of the government and the market.
- Wage echelons. In China’s major industries, the highest wage levels are found in sectors such as computer science, finance and related industries, followed by electricity, health and culture and education industries. The logistics industry is ranked lower, while agriculture remains the lowest. According to CSY (China Statistical Yearbook) data, the average salary of urban units employed in the logistics industry was USD 7288.97 in 2011 and USD 17,027.20 in 2021, with an annual growth rate of 8.85%, ranking in the middle and lower reaches of various industries, slightly lower than the annual growth rate of 8.94% of GDP in the same period. Through the real reflection of the wage echelon, in order to improve the wage level of the logistics industry, we first need to know the inhibiting factors and promoting factors of the wage level in China’s logistics industry. Therefore, the positive and negative impact mechanisms of the variables mentioned above will be discussed.
- Industrial structure changes. China’s industry has been divided into three categories: the main bodies of the primary, secondary and tertiary industries are the agriculture, industrial industry and service industry, respectively. The logistics industry is a part of the tertiary industry, and is known as the artery of China’s economy, penetrating various industries and serving transportation and warehousing in various industries. Indeed, from the perspective of the total output value of various industries, the total output value of three categories of industry has risen, respectively, in recent years. From the perspective of the proportion of the total output value and GDP of various industries, during the period from 2011 to 2021, the proportion of the agriculture, industrial industry and service industry was 9.2%, 46.5% and 44.3% in 2011, and 7.2%, 39.3% and 53.5% in 2021, respectively, in the CSY data. These data showed that the proportion of the agriculture or industrial industry was declining, while the proportion of the service industry was rising. The change in the industrial structure means a change of talent flow and talent concentration, which affects the change in wage level. In 2011, the number of people employed in the secondary industry was 225.39 million, and in 2021 it was 217.12 million, a total decrease of about 8.27 million. However, the number of people employed in the logistics industry (railway, road, water, air, pipeline and posts) was 7,149,213 in 2021, an increase of 46% (about 2.25 million) from 2011. We believe that the shift towards high-quality manufacturing in the manufacturing industry has driven low-skilled workers to enter the logistics industry, thus affecting the level of wages in the logistics industry. Therefore, the paper will focus on the influence mechanism of the change of industrial structure on the wage level of China’s logistics industry.
2.2. Research Hypothesis
- Industrial structure. For the purpose of economic development, local governments intend to guide the development of their own advantageous industries and improve the industrial structure, so the performances of wage levels in various industries in the market are different. For example, R. F. Yang (2013), Z. H. Cheng and Yu (2014) and X. H. Wang et al. (2016) analyzed the inhibition mechanism of the industrial structure on wage income in some industries, and Bao and Lin (2020) found the promoting role of the industrial structure on wage income, but until now, the analysis on the inhibition effect of the industrial structure on wage income has been absolutely rare in the logistics industry. In the process of transformation and upgrading of China’s manufacturing industry, low-skilled workers in high-quality manufacturing have been gradually replaced by machines, and they have begun to flow to the logistics industry, which lowers the average wage level of the logistics industry. Therefore, this paper believes that the industrial structure will affect the wage level of China’s logistics industry, and hypothesis H1 is proposed: The increase of the industrial proportion will squeeze the wage level of China’s logistics industry.
- Inclusive finance. The mechanism analysis revealed the transmission channel from digital inclusive finance, to financing constraints and then labor income share (Z. X. Xu & Li, 2024). We believe that technological progress and labor productivity could also be enhanced by the implementation of an inclusive financial policy. With the support of inclusive financial inputs, the technological process of China’s logistics industry will be accelerated, intelligent logistics and logistics efficiency will be improved and the level of low-carbon and energy-saving logistics will also be improved. Specifically, the Chinese government also needs an intelligent and low-carbon logistics industry. Under China’s dual-carbon strategy, China’s logistics industry needs to strengthen the process of low carbon, and it also needs capital investments to improve the level of scientific and technological energy-saving. Through the Chinese government’s implementation of inclusive finance, financing institutions offer the credit support for logistics technology and the investments and co-constructions for logistics’ applications. Under the support of the Chinese government, with the concentration of intelligent and energy-saving technology’s logistics talents, the industrialization effect of science and technology logistics can be realized. This is conducive to raising the average wage level of the entire Chinese logistics industry. Hypothesis H2 is proposed: Inclusive finance will promote the increase in wages in China’s logistics industry.
- Transport infrastructure. The improvement of infrastructure can not only drive economic growth, but also has an impact on income inequality (S. J. Xu, 2024). Road and port infrastructure increased income inequality, while rail and air infrastructure helped reduce income inequality (S. J. Xu, 2024). Meanwhile, Pei and Gao (2024) found that digital infrastructure could significantly promote the increase in labor wages. In terms of transport infrastructure, the data analysis studies on its impact on wages in the China’s industry are rare. China has vigorously developed transport infrastructure such as roads and railways, and the freight transport volume has achieved rapid growth. According to China’s CSY data, the freight volume of railways and roads increased from 36,969.61 million tons in 2011 to 52,984.99 million tons in 2021. The freight volume of railways and roads achieved positive growth, among which, the freight volume of road transport was the largest, reaching more than 70%. Rail transport accounted for nearly 10% of the freight transport. The better the road and rail transport infrastructure, the higher the transport efficiency, but this will also lead to a large number of individuals and enterprises entering the logistics industry and becoming new transport individuals and transport enterprises. The new entrants have led to the expansion of the market, and freight price competition is inevitable. Difficult-to-manage private logistics resources are also increased, which further intensify the competition. Therefore, hypothesis H3 is proposed: Good transport infrastructure leads to the increase of new entrants in the logistics industry, intensifies the price competition in the industry and is not conducive to the improvement of wages in China’s logistics industry.
2.3. Construction and Empirical Analysis of Econometric Model
2.3.1. Variable Definitions
- Economic and structural variables (lnGDP and lnSecInd). We refer to the literature of Bao and Lin (2020) and choose the regional GDP as a measure of the regional economic development level, which can drive wage growth. The index selection of industrial structure and industrial upgrading is different, and we also refer to the literature of L. M. Zhang (2012) to use the proportion of the industry to study the impact of changes in the industrial structure on wages. L. M. Zhang (2012) found that the change in industrial structure had no major impact on the regional wage level, and the possible reason was that the regional labor market mechanism was not sound. However, industrial agglomeration or industrial integration had different effects on the wage level (R. F. Yang, 2013; Z. H. Cheng & Yu, 2014; X. H. Wang et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2017; Z. H. Yang et al., 2021).
- Inclusive finance variables (lnDig and lnAgg). H. X. Cheng (2022) used the digital financial inclusion index and the index aggregate of digital finance, respectively, to study their impacts on wages. We refer to the study of (H. X. Cheng, 2022) and use inclusive finance variables to further study the wage growth problem in the logistics industry.
- The variables of logistics vehicle scale and Internet access scale (lnTruck and lnBSPI). The existing literature studied the development of freight logistics under industrial transformation and upgrading (S. F. Deng et al., 2019). However, there is very little literature that considers the impact of the logistics vehicle scale on the wage level. Regarding the aspect of Internet use, there was a significant correlation between it and labor income, and Internet use promoted wage growth (S. G. Wang & Kuang, 2022). The variable of the Internet access scale was used in some literature, but we did not find that this variable was used to analyze the wage growth problem in the logistics industry; therefore, we will use it in this paper.
- Transport infrastructure variables. Ma et al. (2023) studied the income gap in rural areas through the use of transport infrastructure (density of road network and density of railway network), but most scholars have used the indicators to study other issues. Many Chinese scholars measured transport infrastructure by route mileage, such as Shao et al. (2024), or by route density (such as Zhao & Xiang, 2012; Ma et al., 2023).We use the variable adopted by Shao et al. (2024), which is reflected by railway mileage (lnRailmile) and road mileage (lnRoadmile), respectively.
2.3.2. Data Source and Description
2.3.3. Theoretical Model and Empirical Model
- (1)
- Theoretical model
- (2)
- Basic regression model
- (3)
- Endogeneity and heterogeneity test
- (4)
- Spillover test between inclusive finance and economic growth
- (5)
- Inhibition test of transport infrastructure
2.3.4. RobustnessTest
2.3.5. Discussion
2.4. Conclusions and Policy Implications
- Inclusive finance, economic growth increment and the synergistic development of inclusive finance and economic growth are conducive to the improvement of wage growth in China’s logistics industry. It is to be believed that the inclusive financial policies have played their roles. Based on the government demand to reduce the national logistics costs and develop the low-carbon logistics under a dual-carbon strategy, the inclusive finance inputs are transmitted to the logistics industry through the credit channels of financial institutions, the investments and co-constructions of logistics’ applications and the projects of intelligent technology and energy saving which have been better carried out, which is very different from other industries. In the process of the science and technological industrialization of the logistics industry, the innovation and technology indicators are starting to attract attention. For example, data from China’s national key industries’ patent information service platform showed that Chinese utility model patents and Chinese invention patents in China’s logistics industry were about 9.58 hundred thousand in 2011, rising to 4.14 million in 2021. As China’s economy grows larger, so does the volume of freight, and the scale effect of intelligent and low-carbon logistics has emerged. The wage income of logistics industry can also be improved.
- The improvements of the industrial structure and transport infrastructure have significant inhibitory effects on the wage growth of China’s logistics industry. In the adjustment and upgrading of the industrial structure, China’s manufacturing industry is oriented to the development of high-quality manufacturing, and low-skilled workers can only enter labor-intensive industries. A decrease of 8.27 million employees in the secondary industry (industrial industry) between 2011 and 2021 is the evidence of a change in the industrial structure. Due to a large number of new workers, the average wage level of the logistics industry grows slowly. For other reasons, the rising prices of resource factors squeeze the profits of the manufacturing industry, thus affecting the profit and wage growth of the logistics industry because logistics are inseparable from the manufacturing industry. The inhibition mechanism of the transport infrastructure mainly comes from the growth of new transport individuals and transport enterprises, and difficult-to-manage private logistics resources are also increased. Homogenized services intensify competition in the logistics industry. China’s logistics market is close to the perfect competition market, and the ultimate consequence of the price competition after market saturation is that the enterprises have no super profits, and can only maintain a low-profit level, which ultimately affects the wage growth of China’s logistics industry. The CSY data show that the average revenue of per parcel express business has also been declining, about USD 3.2 in 2011 and USD 1.48 in 2021.The main reasons are the homogenized services and price competitions; another reason is that the bargaining power of logistics service providers is weak, especially the logistics service providers cooperating with large manufacturing enterprises and e-commerce platforms, as they have to accept low-price contracts with small profit margins.
- In the market force, there are some scale effects: the logistics vehicle scale, Internet access scale, etc. The first one means that logistics resources can achieve large-scale operation, and the second one means the rise of the scale of the Internet economy; both of them are conducive to promoting the wage growth in China’s logistics industry. Moreover, the development of technological industrialization in the logistics industry has also been affected by market force; another market force manifested by the integration between the Internet access scale and economic growth is also conducive to further promoting the wage growth in China’s logistics industry.
- The regional heterogeneity of wage growth in China’s logistics industry reveals that the eastern region has the highest wage level, followed by the western region, with the central region being the lowest. Additionally, wages in the southern region arehigher than those in the northern region. The eastern and southern regions have economic centers such as the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta: the two Deltas are also the most developed core industrial clusters of digital finance and science and technology in China. The Yangtze River Delta has world-class digital finance and e-commerce enterprises such as Alibaba, and the Pearl River Delta has digital technology enterprises such as Huawei and Tencent. It is precisely because of the existence of these great enterprises that there is a drive in the rapid development and technological advancement of e-commerce logistics, catering logistics, retail logistics, etc. Moreover, the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta have obvious geographical advantages, better industrial composition and infrastructure investment, remarkable implementation effects of various policies and greater support for the logistics industry. With the support of world-class digital science and technology enterprises, the eastern and southern regions have accelerated the constructions of digital logistics and intelligent logistics systems in recent years, gathered a number of scientific and technological logistics talents and promoted the wage growth of the logistics industry and the regional differences.
- Inclusive financial policies are good and should continue to be implemented. The Chinese government should continue to encourage financial institutions to offer low-interest credit, optimize resources for logistics enterprises to reduce costs and enhance efficiency. Under the implementation of China’s dual-carbon strategy and the support of inclusive financial inputs, for better development of the logistics industry and prosperity of the economy, the local governments should issue attractive talent policies to gather more high-tech talents to improve the scientific and technological level of logistics enterprises, so as to further achieve wage growth in the logistics industry.
- The scale of Internet access is still to be improved, especially in rural China, which is conducive to the development of agricultural product logistics. The Chinese government should continue to expand the scale of Internet access, continue to implement preferential measures such as high-speed free agricultural products, strengthen circulation efficiency and promote the further development of the agriculture and logistics industry. Policies should be implemented to foster the collaboration between transport individuals and logistics transport enterprises, optimize the competitive environment of logistics and then improve the wage level of China’s logistics industry.
- The adjusting and upgrading of the industrial structure should be continued, orienting to high-quality industrial manufacturing should be encouraged and an integrated operation in the manufacturing–logistics field should be supported by policies. By promoting high-value-added products, Chinese manufacturing and logistics industries can win high profit margins. At the end of the last century, China’s production and export of 100 million shirts to buy a foreign aircraft era did not bring high profits for China’s manufacturing and logistics industry, and now China is exporting a large number of integrated circuit products, new energy vehicles and other high-value-added products to win high profit space. Therefore, an integrated operation in the manufacturing–logistics field is very necessary, and the logistics industry can benefit and the level of wages can be improved from the integrated operation.
- The Belt and Road Initiative and high-quality opening to the outside world are good, and their influences are wide and far-reaching. The Chinese government should continue to spread the Belt and Road Initiative, and further promote high-quality opening to the outside world. This can continue to expand the scale of logistics and transportation, improve and optimize the development of China’s logistics industry and promote the multi-win development of the logistics, industrial industry and foreign trade to ultimately benefit the labor reward in China’s logistics industry.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ai, Y., Song, P., Li, L., & Bai, X. J. (2024). Digital economy development, industrial structure transformation and labor income share improvement: The adjustment perspective based on human capital. Economic Review, 3, 3–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amarante, V. (2014). Revisiting inequality and growth: Evidence for developing countries. Growth & Change, 45(4), 571–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, Z. Q., & Lin, J. Y. (2020). Technological innovation, wage growth and industrial structure upgrading: Dynamic analysis based on PVAR model. Southeast Academic Research, 3, 172–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, H., Gao, Y. D., & Xun, Z. (2024). Digital economy and labor income inequality: Evidence from smart city pilot policies. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, H. X. (2022). Wage effect and mechanism analysis of digital inclusive finance [Postgraduate dissertation, East China Jiaotong University]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Z. H., & Yu, B. B. (2014). Industrial agglomeration and regional wage gap: Spatial econometric analysis based on Chinese urban data. Modern Economic Science, 36(6), 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demir, A., Pesqué-Cela, V., Altunbas, Y., & Murinde, V. (2022). Fintech, financial inclusion and income inequality: A quantile regression approach. European Journal of Finance, 28(1), 86–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, M., & Cao, X. G. (2019). Population age structure, wages, and regional economic growth: An empirical analysis based on China’s provincial panel data from 1995 to 2015. Modern Economic Research, 1, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Deng, S. F., Zhu, J. X., & Zhong, C. B. (2019). Analysis on the evolution of spatial correlation pattern of freight logistics in Jiangsu province under the industrial transformation and upgrading. Area Research and Development, 38(5), 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fawaz, F., Rahnama, M., & Valcarcel, V. J. (2014). A refinement of the relationship between economic growth and income inequality. Applied Economics, 46(27), 3351–3361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, L., & Tian, Z. (2024). Digital economy and the skills wage gap: An empirical study based on CFPS data. Modern Economic Science, 46(2), 75–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanson, G. H. (2005). Market potential, increasing returns and geographic concentration. Journal of International Economics, 67(1), 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, Q., Xia, X. H., & Huang, G. T. (2021). Wage growth effect of migrants in China’s industrial development: Microscopic evidence from China migrant dynamic survey. Journal of Management World, 10, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Li, J. (2021). Study on the impact of logistics industry development on urban-rural income gap: Based on the perspective of labor input. The World of Survey and Research Issue, 3, 30–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J. X., Liang, M., Zhong, Y. X., & Yang, Y. C. (2021). Spatial pattern of wage level in China at city level and its spatial mismatch with economic level. Economic Geography, 41(12), 100–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, W. H. (2023). The impact of digital financial inclusion on employment income: Based on the average wage income of employees in urban private units [Postgraduate dissertation, Jilin University of Finance and Economics]. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, F., Zhang, J. Q., & Liu, M. H. (2017). Industrial agglomeration, wage premium and economic growth. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 8, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, F., Yang, S. L., & Xu, Y. (2023). The impact of transportation infrastructure on the inter-regional income gap among rural residents. Economy and Management, 37(1), 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pei, X., & Gao, Y. D. (2024). How does digital infrastructure construction affect labor wages: Analysis based on the search and match model. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 46(2), 16–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Samuelson, P. A. (1952). The transfer problem and transport costs: The terms of trade when impediments are absent. The Economic Journal, 62(246), 278–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Z. G., Li, K. X., & Li, M. D. (2024, October 23). Decoupling effect and interactive relationship among transportation infrastructure, economic growth, and carbon emissions in China. Environmental Science. CNKI Web Publication Paper. Tongfang Knowledge Network Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y. M., & Su, H. W. (2009). Population mobility, transportation cost and spatial wage distribution. Journal of Southwest University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 9, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y. P. (2020). Transportation infrastructure construction, labor flow and urban-rural income gap. Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 3, 103–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, X., Ye, X., & Lv, K. (2011). Measuring convergence of China’s ICT industry: An input-output analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 35(4), 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J., & Zhang, S. W. (2024). Research on the impact of the digital economy on wages. Lan Zhou Xue Kan, 11, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J. J., & Yue, Z. G. (2016). Financial agglomeration, local demand scale and regional wage differences: An empirical analysis of the panel data from China’s cities of and above prefecture level. Contemporary Finance & Economics, 3, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S. G., & Kuang, G. J. (2022). Internet use, skills heterogeneity and wage income: An empirical analysis based on CGSS data. Seeking Truth, 4, 88–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X. H., Gu, G. F., & Wang, J. K. (2016). Industrial agglomeration, spatial spillover effects and the regional salary gap: Based on the panel data of 285 county-level cities. Journal of Yunnan Finance and Trade Institute, 4, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, S. J. (2024). Study on impact of transportation infrastructure construction on income inequality in countries along the Belt and Road. China Journal of Commerce, 33(21), 104–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Z. X., & Li, Y. W. (2024). Study on the impact of digital inclusive finance on the labor income share of small and micro enterprises. Hainan Finance, 4, 41–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R. F. (2013). Industrial agglomeration and regional wage gap: An empirical study based on 269 cities in China. Journal of Management World, 8, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z. H., Yang, C., & Mi, F. F. (2021). Industrial convergence, technological innovation and wage level: Quasi-natural experimental analysis based on the reform of “Triple Play”. Economic Survey, 38(4), 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B. Y., Huang, Y., Yang, Y. X., & Meng, L. J. (2021). Does minimum wage standard cause regional imbalance in China’s logistics industry growth? Finance and Trade Research, 4, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L. M. (2012). Effects of wage of Shandong on industrial structure upgrading: Analysis based on VAR model. Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (Social Sciences Edition), 14(3), 93–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X., Wang, M. L., & Lin, F. Y. (2022). Digital economy, demographic dividend and urban wage premium. Journal of Finance and Economics, 8, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, W., & Xiang, Y. H. (2012). Location advantage, agglomeration economies and competition for FDI among Chinese regions. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 42(6), 111–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Classification of Variables | Variable Abbreviation | Logarithmic Variable | Original Data Description |
---|---|---|---|
Logistics industry wage level | Average wages in the logistics industry | ln LRealS | The real average salary of employees in urban units of logistics industry in each province (CNY 10,000 per capita) |
Economic and structural variables | Economic growth | ln GDP | Real GDP per capita of each province (CNY 10,000 per capita) |
Industrial structure (proportion of industry) | ln Secind | Ratio of industrial output value to GDP by province (%) | |
Inclusive finance variables | Digital financial inclusion index | ln Dig | Digital financial inclusion index |
Index_aggregate of digital finance | ln Agg | Index_aggregate of digital finance | |
Insurance index | ln Insu | Insurance index | |
Logistics vehicles scale and Internet access scale variables | Logistics vehicles scale | ln Truck | Possession of trucks per capita by province (trucks per capita) |
Internet access scale | ln BSPI | Broadband subscribers port of Internet per capita in each province (per hundred people) | |
Transport infrastructure variables | Railway mileage | ln Railmile | Railway operating mileage (10,000 km) |
Road mileage | ln Roadmile | Road mileage (10,000 km) | |
Dummy variables | Eastern region variable | East | Dummy variable, It is 1 for the eastern provinces and 0 for the other provinces |
Central region variable | Central | Dummy variable, It is 1 for the central provinces and 0 for the other provinces | |
Western region variable | West | Dummy variable, It is 1 for the western provinces and 0 for the other provinces | |
Southern and northern region variable | North | Dummy variable, It is 1 for the northern provinces and 0 for the southern provinces |
Variable | Obs | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln LRealS | 341 | 1.856 | 0.242 | 1.284 | 2.538 |
ln GDP | 341 | 1.210 | 0.397 | 0.464 | 2.293 |
ln Secind | 341 | 3.678 | 0.234 | 2.771 | 4.126 |
ln Truck | 341 | −4.041 | 0.369 | −4.837 | −2.856 |
ln BSPI | 341 | 3.706 | 0.575 | 2.156 | 4.677 |
ln Dig | 341 | 5.556 | 0.681 | 2.026 | 6.136 |
ln Agg | 341 | 5.276 | 0.677 | 2.786 | 6.129 |
ln Insu | 341 | 5.960 | 0.916 | −1.386 | 6.859 |
ln Railmile | 341 | −1.146 | 0.730 | −2.996 | 0.351 |
ln Roadmile | 341 | 2.471 | 0.840 | 0.191 | 3.686 |
East | 341 | 0.355 | 0.479 | 0 | 1 |
Central | 341 | 0.258 | 0.438 | 0 | 1 |
West | 341 | 0.387 | 0.488 | 0 | 1 |
North | 341 | 0.484 | 0.500 | 0 | 1 |
Year | Area | East | Central | West | North | LRealS (RMB:CNY 10,000) | LRealS (US:USD 10,000) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | Beijing(bj) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10.928 | 1.694 |
2021 | Fujian(fj) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.086 | 1.408 |
2021 | Guangdong(gd) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.819 | 1.522 |
2021 | Hainan(hain) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.283 | 1.439 |
2021 | Hebei(heb) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.024 | 1.244 |
2021 | Jiangsu(js) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.837 | 1.370 |
2021 | Liaoning(ln) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7.755 | 1.202 |
2021 | Shandong(sd) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8.682 | 1.346 |
2021 | Shanghai(shai) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12.656 | 1.962 |
2021 | Tianjin(tj) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9.243 | 1.433 |
2021 | Zhejiang(zj) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9.909 | 1.536 |
2021 | Anhui(ah) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.877 | 1.221 |
2021 | Henan(hen) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.103 | 1.101 |
2021 | Heilongjiang(hlj) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.768 | 1.204 |
2021 | Hubei(hub) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8.406 | 1.303 |
2021 | Hunan(hun) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.981 | 1.237 |
2021 | Jilin(jl) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7.11 | 1.102 |
2021 | Jiangxi(jx) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.697 | 1.193 |
2021 | Shanxi(sx) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8.424 | 1.306 |
2021 | Gansu(gs) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.964 | 1.234 |
2021 | Guangxi(gx) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8.184 | 1.269 |
2021 | Guizhou(gz) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8.445 | 1.309 |
2021 | Neimenggu(nmg) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8.675 | 1.345 |
2021 | Ningxia(nx) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.979 | 1.237 |
2021 | Qinghai(qh) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.039 | 1.401 |
2021 | Sichuan(sc) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8.45 | 1.310 |
2021 | Shaanxi(shx) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8.138 | 1.261 |
2021 | Xijiang(xj) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9.309 | 1.443 |
2021 | Xizan(xz) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 10.48 | 1.624 |
2021 | Yunnan(yn) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8.787 | 1.362 |
2021 | Chongqing(cq) | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8.133 | 1.261 |
Model I (TSLS Estimation) | Model II (TSLS Estimation) | |
---|---|---|
ln Dig | 0.153 ***(4.70) | 0.073 ***(2.60) |
Δln GDP | 0.741 ***(3.70) | |
ln GDP | 0.120 ***(4.78) | |
ln Secind | −0.16 ***(−5.89) | −0.169 ***(−6.21) |
ln Truck | 0.126 ***(6.48) | 0.083 ***(4.13) |
ln BSPI | 0.185 ***(7.61) | 0.262 ***(15.04) |
Constant | 1.252 ***(6.38) | 1.423 ***(7.59) |
Number of obs | 310 | 310 |
Wald test | 997.24 *** | 1001.13 *** |
R-squared | 0.7528 | 0.7344 |
Instrument variable | L.lnDig | L.lnDig |
Model I (TSLS Estimation) | Model II (TSLS Estimation) | Model II (TSLS Estimation) | Model II (TSLS Estimation) | Model II (TSLS Estimation) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ln Dig | 0.146 ***(4.47) | 0.098 ***(2.94) | 0.101 ***(3.54) | 0.062 **(2.24) | 0.054 **(1.96) |
Δln GDP | 0.868 ***(4.42) | 0.874 ***(4.66) | 0.679 ***(3.53) | 0.583 ***(2.92) | |
ln GDP | 0.157 ***(5.39) | ||||
ln Secind | −0.167 ***(−5.92) | −0.161 ***(−5.79) | −0.144 ***(−5.39) | −0.165 ***(−6.16) | −0.176 ***(−6.29) |
ln Truck | 0.131 ***(6.69) | 0.088 ***(4.38) | 0.060 ***(2.90) | 0.068 ***(3.26) | 0.137 ***(7.23) |
ln BSPI | 0.189 ***(7.64) | 0.237 ***(10.47) | 0.246 ***(14.41) | 0.279 ***(15.25) | 0.266 ***(15.48) |
East | −0.044 **(−2.50) | 0.035 *(1.87) | |||
Central | −0.073 ***(−5.12) | ||||
West | 0.034 ***(2.69) | ||||
North | −0.085 ***(−6.68) | ||||
Constant | 1.295 ***(6.47) | 1.349 ***(6.81) | 1.156 ***(5.95) | 1.337 ***(7.14) | 1.805 ***(9.51) |
Number of obs | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 |
Wald test | 992.08 *** | 1036.81 *** | 1071.33 *** | 1013.57 *** | 1181.35 *** |
R-squared | 0.7572 | 0.7395 | 0.7539 | 0.7385 | 0.7639 |
Instrument variable | L.lnDig | L.lnDig | L.lnDig | L.lnDig | L.lnDig |
Extended Model II(TSLS Estimation) | Extended Model II(TSLS Estimation) | Extended Model II(TSLS Estimation) | Extended Model II(TSLS Estimation) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ln Dig | 0.126 ***(3.95) | 0.140 ***(4.39) | 0.131 ***(4.10) | 0.257 ***(10.28) |
Δln GDP | 0.900 ***(4.63) | 0.879 ***(4.53) | 0.884 ***(4.56) | 1.134 ***(5.42) |
ln Secind | −0.155 ***(−5.95) | −0.151 ***(−5.82) | −0.152 ***(−5.89) | −0.155 ***(−5.46) |
ln Truck | 0.122 ***(6.33) | 0.126 ***(6.59) | 0.125 ***(6.57) | 0.153 ***(7.51) |
ln BSPI | 0.172 ***(6.84) | 0.153 ***(5.87) | 0.167 ***(6.56) | |
lnGDP* lnDig | 0.022 ***(5.22) | |||
lnGDP* lnAgg | 0.025 ***(5.83) | |||
lnGDP* lnInsu | 0.020 ***(5.57) | |||
lnGDP* lnBSPI | 0.051 ***(13.21) | |||
Constant | 1.412 *** (7.35) | 1.39 ***(7.26) | 1.404 ***(7.35) | 1.349 ***(6.13) |
Number of obs | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 |
Wald test | 1135.07 *** | 1161.55 *** | 1148.93 *** | 898.99 *** |
R-squared | 0.7662 | 0.7727 | 0.7702 | 0.7445 |
Instrument variable | L.lnDig | L.lnDig | L.lnDig | L.lnDig |
Model III (TSLS Estimation) | Model III (TSLS Estimation) | Model IV (TSLS Estimation) | Model IV (TSLS Estimation) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ln Dig | 0.126 ***(4.93) | 0.118 ***(4.01) | 0.177 ***(6.93) | 0.076 ***(3.02) |
Δln GDP | 0.885 ***(4.41) | 0.885 ***(4.43) | 1.032 ***(5.19) | 0.768 ***(3.89) |
ln Secind | −0.065 **(−2.22) | −0.093 ***(−2.71) | −0.045 *(−1.68) | −0.109 ***(−3.11) |
ln Truck | 0.078 ***(4.21) | 0.073 ***(3.55) | 0.119 ***(6.34) | 0.071 ***(3.31) |
ln BSPI | 0.256 ***(16.56) | 0.242 ***(14.41) | 0.192 ***(10.99) | 0.278 ***(15.00) |
lnRailMile | −0.069 ***(−6.04) | |||
lnRoadMile | −0.039 ***(−3.00) | |||
lnGDP* lnRailMile | −0.051 ***(−8.61) | |||
lnGDP* lnRoadMile | −0.019 **(−2.10) | |||
Constant | 0.658 ***(3.05) | 1.017 ***(4.43) | 0.707 ***(3.87) | 1.128 ***(4.94) |
Number of obs | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 |
Wald test | 1128.74 *** | 1000.46 *** | 1340.58 *** | 991.13 *** |
R-squared | 0.7755 | 0.7505 | 0.7995 | 0.7409 |
Instrument variable | L.lnDig | L.lnDig | L.lnDig | L.lnDig |
Model II (GMM Estimation) | Model II (GMM Estimation) | Model II (GMM Estimation) | Model II (GMM Estimation) | Model II (GMM Estimation) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
lnAgg | 0.182 ***(4.96) | 0.207 ***(5.07) | 0.222 ***(6.00) | 0.176 ***(4.93) | 0.138 ***(3.62) |
Δln GDP | 0.535 ***(2.73) | 0.638 ***(3.36) | 0.635 ***(3.50) | 0.479 **(2.54) | 0.454 **(2.29) |
ln Secind | −0.167 ***(−6.66) | −0.159 ***(−6.21) | −0.139 ***(−5.76) | −0.163 ***(−6.62) | −0.173 ***(−6.59) |
ln Truck | 0.086 ***(4.40) | 0.093 ***(4.82) | 0.062 ***(3.14) | 0.068 ***(3.41) | 0.130 ***(6.85) |
ln BSPI | 0.167 ***(6.11) | 0.134 ***(4.13) | 0.134 ***(5.05) | 0.184 ***(6.70) | 0.194 ***(6.77) |
East | 0.038 **(2.36) | ||||
Central | −0.083 ***(−6.66) | ||||
West | 0.037 ***(3.20) | ||||
North | −0.071 ***(−5.35) | ||||
Constant | 1.217 ***(6.84) | 1.189 ***(6.44) | 0.945 ***(5.19) | 1.088 ***(6.24) | 1.593 ***(8.24) |
Number of obs | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 |
Wald test | 1103.12 *** | 1144.79 *** | 1205.96 *** | 1132.59 *** | 1253.77 *** |
R-squared | 0.7681 | 0.7758 | 0.7961 | 0.7729 | 0.7831 |
Instrument variable | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg |
ModelII (GMM Estimation) | ModelII (GMM Estimation) | ModelII (GMM Estimation) | ModelII (GMM Estimation) | ModelII (GMM Estimation) | ModelII (GMM Estimation) | ModelII (GMM Estimation) | ModelII (GMM Estimation) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
lnAgg | 0.218 *** (5.76) | 0.223 *** (5.86) | 0.215 *** (5.69) | 0.278 *** (13.16) | 0.22 *** (6.03) | 0.236 *** (5.79) | 0.252 *** (6.84) | 0.19 *** (5.25) |
Δln GDP | 0.629 *** (3.37) | 0.592 *** (3.17) | 0.608 *** (3.25) | 0.587 *** (3.10) | 0.615 *** (3.09) | 0.626 *** (3.20) | 0.689 *** (3.56) | 0.557 *** (2.86) |
ln Secind | −0.156 *** (−6.41) | −0.153 *** (−6.30) | −0.155 *** (−6.35) | −0.151 *** (−6.23) | −0.07 *** (−2.62) | −0.081 *** (−2.61) | −0.059 *** (−2.42) | −0.098 *** (−2.98) |
ln Truck | 0.126 *** (6.87) | 0.129 *** (7.09) | 0.128 *** (7.01) | 0.135 *** (7.35) | 0.085 *** (4.85) | 0.078 *** (4.06) | 0.127 *** (7.09) | 0.072 *** (3.51) |
ln BSPI | 0.079 ** (2.47) | 0.068 ** (2.10) | 0.082 *** (2.58) | 0.157 *** (6.04) | 0.129 *** (4.52) | 0.096 *** (3.49) | 0.182 *** (6.83) | |
lnGDP* lnDig | 0.021 *** (5.54) | |||||||
lnGDP* lnAgg | 0.022 *** (5. 96) | |||||||
lnGDP* lnInsu | 0.018 *** (5.66) | |||||||
lnGDP* lnBSPI | 0.033 *** (8.62) | |||||||
lnRailMile | −0.066 *** (−6.33) | |||||||
lnRoadMile | −0.045 *** (−3.84) | |||||||
lnGDP* lnRailMile | −0.046 *** (−8.80) | |||||||
lnGDP* lnRoadMile | −0.022 *** (−2.61) | |||||||
Constant | 1.334 *** (7.31) | 1.35 *** (7.29) | 1.348 *** (7.36) | 1.315 *** (7.01) | 0.613 *** (3.04) | 0.835 *** (3.83) | 0.806 *** (4.43) | 0.869 *** (3.76) |
Number of obs | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 | 310 |
Wald test | 1235.70 *** | 1254.01 *** | 1241.42 *** | 1190.94 *** | 1260.79 *** | 1112.12 *** | 1448.92 *** | 1099.24 *** |
R-squared | 0.7996 | 0.8035 | 0.8002 | 0.8049 | 0.8097 | 0.7932 | 0.8317 | 0.7774 |
Instrument variable | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg | L.lnAgg |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, F.; Li, C. Study on the Mechanism of Wage Growth in China’s Logistics Industry: The Roles of Government and Market. Economies 2025, 13, 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13080234
Wang F, Li C. Study on the Mechanism of Wage Growth in China’s Logistics Industry: The Roles of Government and Market. Economies. 2025; 13(8):234. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13080234
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Fuzhong, and Chongyan Li. 2025. "Study on the Mechanism of Wage Growth in China’s Logistics Industry: The Roles of Government and Market" Economies 13, no. 8: 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13080234
APA StyleWang, F., & Li, C. (2025). Study on the Mechanism of Wage Growth in China’s Logistics Industry: The Roles of Government and Market. Economies, 13(8), 234. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies13080234