The Power Actor and Madrasah Performance: Political Connections as a Moderating Variable
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Foundation and Development of the Hypotheses
2.1. Political Connections and Age
2.2. Political Relations and Education
2.3. Political Connections and Tenure
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Data and Sample
3.2. Definitions and Measurement of Variabels
3.2.1. Dependent Variable
3.2.2. Independent Variable
3.2.3. Moderating Variable
3.2.4. Control Variable
3.3. Regression Model
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Descriptive Statistics
4.2. Political Relations and Characteristics of Heads of Madrasah
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Almahdawi, Manal, Salieu Senghore, Horia Ambrin, and Shasidhar Belbase. 2021. Performance indicators of high school students in distance learning in chemistry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educational Sciences 11: 672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, James S., David K. Ding, and Tiong Yang Thong. 2013. Political relations and corporate values. Asian Development Review 30: 131–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asadullah, M. Niaz, and Maliki. 2018. Madrasah for girls and private school for boys? The determinants of school type choice in rural and urban Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development 62: 96–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Asadullah, M. Niaz, and Nazmul Chaudhury. 2016. To madrasahs or not to madrasahs: The question and correlates of enrolment in Islamic schools in Bangladesh. International Journal of Educational Development 49: 55–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bano, Masooda. 2014. Madrasa reforms and Islamic modernism in Bangladesh. Modern Asian Studies 48: 911–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, Marshall H. 1970. Sociometric Locations and Innovation: Reformulation and Expansion of the Diffusion Model. American Sociological Review 35: 267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhagat, Sanjai, Brian J. Bolton, and Ajay Subramanian. 2010. CEO Education, CEO Turnover, and Firm Performance. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1670219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bobe, Belete J., and Ralph Kober. 2020. Personal characteristics of the university dean and use of management control systems and performance measures. Studies in Higher Education 45: 235–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Boling, J. Ruben, Torsten M. Pieper, and Jeffrey G. Covin. 2016. CEO Ownership and Entrepreneurship Orientation in Family and Non-Family Companies. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 40: 891–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Campos-García, Irene, and Jose Zúñiga-Vicente. 2020. Strategic decision making in secondary schools: The impact of the demographic profile of principals. Leadership and Policy in Schools. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carnahan, Seth, Rajshree Agarwal, and Benjamin Campbell. 2010. Effect of Corporate Compensation Structure on Mobility and Entrepreneurship of Extreme Actors. Business 1154: 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carpenter, Mason A., Marta A. Geletkancz, and Wm. Gerard Sanders. 2004. Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management 30: 749–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Channon, Derek. 1979. Corporate Leadership and Performance in the Service Industry. Journal of Management Studies 16: 185–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Wanyu (Tina), Gaoguang (Stephen) Zhou, and Xindong (Kevin) Zhu. 2019. CEO tenure and corporate social responsibility performance. Journal of Business Research 95: 292–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Louis T. W., and Tak Yan Leung. 2016. Government protection, political connections, and management change in China. International Review of Economics and Finance 45: 160–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Louis T. W., Ricky Y. K. Chan, and Tak Yan Leung. 2018. Impact of benefits spending and marketing spending on firm performance in China: The moderating role of political connections. Journal of Business Research 86: 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Child, John. 1975. Managerial and Organizational Factors Associated With Company Performance-Part Ii. a Contingency Analysis. Journal of Management Studies 12: 12–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chow, Chee W., and Wim A. Van der Stede. 2006. Uses and Non-financial Uses. Quarterly Management Accounting 7: 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Clark, Darmon, Paco Martorell, and Jonah Rockoff. 2009. Principal and School Performance. Working Paper 38. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research Working Paper. December. Available online: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED509693 (accessed on 12 December 2009).
- Collins, Randall. 1971. Functional Theory and Conflict of Educational Stratification. American Sociological Review 36: 1002–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Coulson, Andrew. 2004. Education and Indoctrination in the Muslim World Is There a Problem? What Can We Do about It? Washington, DC: Cato Institute. [Google Scholar]
- Díaz-Fernández, M. Carmen, M. Rasorio González-Rodríguez, and Biagio Simonetti. 2020. Top management team diversity and high performance: An integrative approach based on upper echelons and complexity theory. European Journal of Management 38: 157–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donatella, Pierre, and Torbjörn Tagesson. 2020. CFO characteristics and opportunistic accounting choice in public sector organizations. Journal of Management and Governance 25: 509–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eduardo, Marcelo, and Brooks Poole. 2016. CEO age and gender: Subsequent market performance. Cogent Business and Management 3: 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farinha, Caria, Sandra Caeiro, and Ullissies Azeiteiro. 2019. Sustainability strategy in Portuguese higher education institutions: Internal insights and commitment and practice. Sustainability 11: 3227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fisher, Edward P. 1992. The impact of play on development: A meta-analysis. In Play & Culture. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc., vol. 5, Issue 2. pp. 159–81. [Google Scholar]
- Fizel, John L., Kenneth K. T. Louie, and Marc S. Mentzer. 1990. An economic, organizational and behavioral model of the determinants of CEO tenure. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 14: 363–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GERAMM. 2019. Available online: https://id.scribd.com/document/447506845/Buku-GERAMM-1-pdf (accessed on 20 March 2021).
- Goyal, Vidhan K., and Chul W. Park. 2002. Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance 8: 49–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hambrick, Donald C. 1986. Upper Echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review 9: 193–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hambrick, Donald C. 2007. Upper echelon theory: Update. Management Academy Review 32: 334–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helgøy, Inggrid, and Anne Homme. 2016. Education and marketing reform in Norway–A challenge to the social democratic and inclusive school tradition? Research in Comparative and International Education 11: 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, Wanrong, Richard L. Priem, and Maria Goranova. 2017. Does One Size Fit All? Investigating Pay–Future Performance Relationships During CEO “Seasons”. Journal of Management 43: 864–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iptek, J., and R. Lipi. 2015. Ministry of Religion Strategic Plan. pp. 1–6. Available online: https://doi.org/351.077 Ind r (accessed on 15 April 2021).
- Jackson, Stephen James. 2020. “Not in indoctrination”: Religious education in South Australian public schools, 1968–1980. Review of the History of Education 49: 249–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahoda, G., and Jack H. Curtis. 1960. Social psychology. British Journal of Sociology 11: 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalkan, Ümit, Fahriye Altınay Aksal, Zehra Altınay Gazi, Ramazan Atasoy, and Gökmen Dağlı. 2020. Relationship Between School Administrator Leadership Style, School Culture, and Organizational Image. SAGE Open, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kimberly, Jhon R., and Michael J. Evanisko. 1981. Organizational Innovation: Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Technology Innovation Adoption and Hospital Administration Author(s): John R. Kimberly and Michael J. Evanisko Published by: Academy of Management. Journal of Academic Management 24: 689–713. [Google Scholar]
- Kunze, Florian, Anneloes M. L. Raes, and Heike Bruch. 2015. It matters how old you are: Performance antecedents and consequences of average subjective, relative age in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 100: 1511–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Lafrarchi, Naima. 2020. Reviewing the Islamic religious education curriculum in public secondary schools in Indonesia. Religion 11: 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lestari, H., Wahyu Sopandi, U. S. Sa’ud, B. Mustafa, D. Budimansyah, and R. R. Sukardi. 2021. The impact of online mentoring in the implementation of radec learning on the competence of elementary school teachers in training students’ critical thinking skills: A case study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Science Education 10: 346–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ling, Leng, Danglun Luo, and Guoman She. 2019. Judging a Book by its Cover: The Effect of Physical Attractiveness on the Promotion of Regional Leaders. Journal of Economic and Organizational Behavior 158: 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Xienyue, Ge Wang, Chang Zhu, and Xinyang Chi. 2021. Mapping the challenges to the sustainable operation of suburban villages in a metropolis: A comparative case study from the lens of three stakeholder-led approaches. Land 10: 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maaloul, Anies, Raida Chakroun, and Sabrine Yahyaoui. 2018. The effect of political connections on companies’ performance and value: Evidence from Tunisian companies after the revolution. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies 8: 185–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- McGrail, Peter, and Anthony Towey. 2019. Partner in progress? A study of the impact of the 2016 Religious Education reform in the UK. International Journal of Christianity and Education 23: 278–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mokhtar, Intan Azura. 2010. Madrasahs in Singapore: Bridging the gap between their role, relevance, and resources. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 30: 111–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niazi, Murtaza Masud, Zaleha Othman, and Sitraselvi Chandren. 2021. Moderate director’s financial expertise in political relations and corporate financial performance in Pakistan. Accounting 7: 865–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, Sabina. 2010. Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews 12: 301–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nkundabannyanga, Stephen Karutaro, Moses Muhwezi, and Venancio Tauringana. 2018. Ugandan secondary school management accounting practice, governing board, and competitive advantage. International Journal of Educational Management 32: 958–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagès, Marcel. 2021. Enacting performance-based accountability in a Southern European school system: Between administrative and market logics. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 33: 535–61. [Google Scholar]
- Paraskeva, Joao M. 2022. ‘Did COVID-19 exist before the scientists?’ Towards curriculum theory now. Educational Philosophy and Theory 54: 158–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parker, Lynette, and Raihani. 2009. Governing madrasah. Policy Brief 4: 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Rahim, Bushra. 2019. Decentralized decision making and educational outcomes in public schools: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management 33: 1625–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reitz, H. Joseph. 1979. Organizational External Controls: The Resource Dependency Perspective. Management Academy Review 4: 309–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saeed, Abubkr, and Hafiz Muhammad Ziaulhaq. 2019. The Impact of CEO Characteristics on the Internationalization of SMEs: Evidence from the British. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 36: 322–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Serfling, Matthew A. 2014. CEO age and company policy risk. Journal of Corporate Finance 25: 251–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stevens, John M., Janice M. Beyer, and Harisson M. Trice. 1978. Assessing personal, role, and organizational predictors of managerial commitment. Academy of Management Journal 21: 380–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ting, Irene W. K., Noor Azlina Binti Azizan, and Qian Long Kweh. 2015. Upper Echelon Theory Revisited: The Relationship between CEO Personal Characteristics and Financial Leverage Decisions. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 195: 686–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Warrier, Uma, Monoo John, and Surendranath Warrier. 2021. Utilizing Emotional Intelligence Competencies for the Sustainable Development of Higher Education in the New Normal Era. FIIB Business Review 10: 62–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wittmer, Fabius, and Christian Waldhoff. 2019. Religious education in Germany about religious diversity: Constitutional requirements for religious education. German Journal of Law 20: 1047–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ye, Zihan, and Thomas Post. 2020. What age do you feel?–Subjective age identity and economic behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Organizational Economics 173: 322–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, Cuiying, Ping Li, and Li Jin. 2021. Online college English education in Wuhan against the COVID-19 pandemic: Student and teacher readiness, challenges and implications. PLoS ONE 16: e0258137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variable | Symbol | Information |
---|---|---|
Age | AGE | Age of the head of the madrasah, where 1 = 40, 2 = 41–50, 3 = 51–60, 4 = 60 |
Education | education | The educational background of the head of the madrasah, if 0, the head of the madrasah has a bachelor’s degree, and if 1, holds a master’s degree/doctoral degree. |
Length of service | TNR | The term of office of the head of the madrasa, where 1 = 10 years in the madrasa, 2 = 11–20 years in the madrasa, 3 = 20+ years in the madrasah |
Political Connection | POLTC | When the madrasah committee has or is holding a government position, code 1 and code 0 if not present |
Madrasah Achievements | PERFORM | Financial and non-financial performance |
Madrasah Size | SIZE | Number of students based on madrasah level where 1 = number of students > 1000 and code 0 = number of students < 1000 |
Variable | Means | Std. Dev | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGE (1 = 40, 2 = 41–50, 3 = 51–60, 4 = ≧61) | 2.6019 | 0.55659 | - | 3.0 | 34.3 | 62.3 | 5 |
education (0 = title S1 and 1 = S2/S3) | 0.6898 | 0.4631 | 31.0 | 69.0 | - | - | - |
TNR (1 = 10, 2 = 11–20, 3 = ≧21) | 1.2051 | 0.4975 | 3.9 | 71.3 | 23.8 | 0.2 | - |
SIZE (number of madrasah students) | 6.2463 | 0.68721 | - | - | - | - | - |
POLTC (1 = connected and 0 = not connected) | 0.8889 | 0.31463 | 11.1 | 88.9 | - | - | - |
Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
constant | coefficient | 47,211 | 66.683 | 48.375 | 55,912 |
t-value | 7235 | 7961 | 6820 | 7.549 | |
Sig | 0.000 * | 0.000 * | 0.000 * | 0.000 | |
AGE | coefficient | −2.204 | −9733 | −2158 | −1800 |
t-value | −1.875 | −4097 | −1827 | −1.525 | |
Sig | 0.061 ** | 0.000 * | 0.068 ** | 0.128 | |
education | coefficient | 1.568 | 1945 | −0.146 | 1670 |
t-value | 1.100 | 1.379 | −0.034 | 1.177 | |
Sig | 0.272 | 0.168 | 0.973 | 0.240 | |
TNR | coefficient | −11,346 | −10,843 | −11,334 | −19.206 |
t-value | −8.858 | −8535 | −8837 | −5.535 | |
Sig | 0.000 * | 0.000 * | 0.000 * | 0.000 | |
POLTC | coefficient | −8810 | −32,574 | −10,209 | −19.131 |
t-value | −4.287 | −4.754 | −2613 | −4.067 | |
Sig | 0.000 * | 0.000 * | 0.009 * | 0.000 * | |
AGE*POLTC | coefficient | 9.929 | |||
t-value | 3630 | ||||
Sig | 0.000 * | ||||
EDU*POLTC | coefficient | 1908 | |||
t-value | 0.421 | ||||
Sig | 0.674 | ||||
TNR*POLTC | coefficient | 9.110 | |||
t-value | 2.435 | ||||
Sig | 0.015 * | ||||
SIZE | coefficient | 0.849 | 0.383 | 0.843 | 0.683 |
t-value | 0.876 | 0.398 | 0.870 | 0.707 | |
Sig | 0.381 | 0.691 | 0.385 | 0.480 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Rahmawaty; Narsa, I.M. The Power Actor and Madrasah Performance: Political Connections as a Moderating Variable. Economies 2022, 10, 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050107
Rahmawaty, Narsa IM. The Power Actor and Madrasah Performance: Political Connections as a Moderating Variable. Economies. 2022; 10(5):107. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050107
Chicago/Turabian StyleRahmawaty, and I Made Narsa. 2022. "The Power Actor and Madrasah Performance: Political Connections as a Moderating Variable" Economies 10, no. 5: 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050107
APA StyleRahmawaty, & Narsa, I. M. (2022). The Power Actor and Madrasah Performance: Political Connections as a Moderating Variable. Economies, 10(5), 107. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10050107