Next Article in Journal
Re-Examining the Effects of Official Development Assistance on Foreign Direct Investment Applying the VAR Model
Previous Article in Journal
Foreign Direct Investment and Exports Stimulate Economic Growth? Evidence of Equilibrium Relationship in Peru
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Effects of Regulatory Performance on the Debt–Growth Relationship: Cases of Upper-Middle-Income Economies

Economies 2022, 10(10), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10100235
by Nur Hayati Abd Rahman 1,*, Shafinar Ismail 1, Khairunnisa Abd Samad 1, Bestari Dwi Handayani 2, Yozi Aulia Rahman 2 and Wijang Sakitri 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Economies 2022, 10(10), 235; https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10100235
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 8 September 2022 / Accepted: 13 September 2022 / Published: 23 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Economic Development)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper attempts to examine “The effects of regulatory performance on debt-growth relation-ship: Cases of upper-middle-income economies”. First of all, I would like to thank the editor to select me as a reviewer for this paper. After reviewing, I find that this paper migh be reached the quality of the journal. The paper is readable ragarding the relationship between external debt and economic growth in the interaction between external debt and regulatory performance.

As the previous studies, I think that the method based on GMM is acceptable. This method is good for checking endogeneity problems in the regression.

For better contribution to the literature, I have some revisions that are good for enhancing the quality of the manuscript.

1.      World Bank Group Discontinued Doing Business Report since June 2020. Therefore, regulatory performance based on doing business may be not studied in the future. I don’t think that this investigation can support for the future work. This issue should be indicated in the limitations.

2.      The paper should have a theoretical framework that summarizing the interaction between external debt and regulatory performance, and its impact on economic growth.

3.      The techniques should check endogeneity before running the GMM. Which variables meet endogeneity problems? I don’t think that all variables can meet endogeneity problems.

4.      The robustness check for GMM should be discussed, due to the sensitivity of GMM method.

5.      Upper-middle-income economies may be met the cross-sectional dependence when the time dimension becomes large. It should be checked.

6.      The list of Upper-middle-income economies should be added in the appendix.

7.      Inflation can be proxied for Economic uncertainty. The paper should have the source for this.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

I highly appreciate this study. However, I have comments as follows:

1.       The abstract should provide more information regarding the findings, policy implementation, and the scientific contribution of the results to the economic literature.

2.       The discussion section should compare the findings and the other relevant studies.

3.        The conclusion may highlight the specific policy for ease of starting a business to improve economic growth.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

As this revised version of the paper has met almost all my recommendations, I suggest the

editor to accept it. However, I still believe that some of the revisions could have been more elaborated.

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your comments. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper attempts to examine “The effects of regulatory performance on debt-growth relation-ship: Cases of upper-middle-income economies”. First of all, I would like to thank the editor to select me as a reviewer for this paper. After reviewing, I acknowledge that the authors have much improved in the revised manuscript. However, few comments are not done.

 

Please to see on the attachments

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

Thank you for your comments. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Professor,

I hope that my previous comments treat you well. After carefully checking the second revised draft, I feel sastified with this verson. Therefore, I completely do the acceptance on this.

Thank you

 

Back to TopTop