Next Article in Journal
Effects of Family Ownership, Debt and Board Composition on Mexican Firms Performance
Previous Article in Journal
How the Economic and Financial Situation of the Community Affects Sport Clubs’ Resources: Evidence from Multi-Level Models
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Financial Stud. 2015, 3(1), 49-55;

Modern and Traditional Methods for Measuring Money Supply: The Case of Saudi Arabia

Department of Economics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-7585, USA
Center for Financial Stability, New York, NY 10036, USA
Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency, Riyadh 11169, Saudi Arabia
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Nicholas Apergis
Received: 15 January 2015 / Revised: 12 February 2015 / Accepted: 16 February 2015 / Published: 25 February 2015
Full-Text   |   PDF [150 KB, uploaded 25 February 2015]   |  


This paper compares the “simple-sum” monetary aggregates (M1 and M2) published by the Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency (SAMA) with the new monetary aggregates (D1 and D2)—known as the Divisia monetary indexes. The former aggregates are constructed from a simple accounting identity, whereas the Divisia aggregates are constructed using statistical index number theory and aggregation theory. The findings suggest that both D1 and M1 are identical, given the perfect substitutability of the monetary components within those aggregates. For the broader monetary aggregates where perfect substitutability assumption is not realistic, the two monetary indexes differ substantially. SAMA could benefit by using both monetary indexes simultaneously to better monitor liquidity in the market. View Full-Text
Keywords: monetary aggregation; Divisia monetary aggregates; index number theory monetary aggregation; Divisia monetary aggregates; index number theory

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Barnett, W.A.; Alkhareif, R.M. Modern and Traditional Methods for Measuring Money Supply: The Case of Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Financial Stud. 2015, 3, 49-55.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Int. J. Financial Stud. EISSN 2227-7072 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top