Next Article in Journal
Plant Viruses Infecting Solanaceae Family Members in the Cultivated and Wild Environments: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Cloning and Functional Characterization of CpMYC2 and CpBHLH13 Transcription Factors from Wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox L.)
Previous Article in Journal
Development and Optimization of a Germination Assay and Long-Term Storage for Cannabis sativa Pollen
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Product Specificities of Maize Terpene Synthases TPS4 and TPS10 Are Determined Both by Active Site Amino Acids and Residues Adjacent to the Active Site
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 9
Issue 5
10.3390/plants9050666
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification and Molecular Characterization of Geranyl Diphosphate Synthase (GPPS) Genes in Wintersweet Flower

by
Hafiz Muhammad Kamran
1,
Syed Bilal Hussain
1,
Shang Junzhong
1,
Lin Xiang
1,* and
Long-Qing Chen
2,*
1
Key Laboratory of Horticultural Plant Biology (Ministry of Education), College of Horticulture & Forestry Sciences, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Southwest Engineering Research Center for Landscape Architecture (State Forestry and Grassland Administration), Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2020, 9(5), 666; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050666
Submission received: 31 March 2020 / Revised: 18 May 2020 / Accepted: 20 May 2020 / Published: 24 May 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biosynthesis and Functions of Terpenoids in Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS) is a plastid localized enzyme that catalyzes the biosynthesis of Geranyl diphosphate (GPP), which is a universal precursor of monoterpenes. Wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox L.), a famous deciduous flowering shrub with a strong floral scent character, could have GPPS-like homologs that are involved in monoterpenes biosynthesis, but it remains unclear. In the present study, five full-length GPPS and geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthases (GGPPS) genes were identified in the wintersweet transcriptome database. The isolated cDNAs showed high protein sequence similarity with the other plants GPPS and GGPPS. The phylogenetic analysis further classified these cDNAs into four distinct clades, representing heterodimeric GPPS small subunits (SSU1 and SSU2), homodimeric GPPS, and GGPPS. Analysis of temporal expression revealed that all genes have the highest transcript level at the full-open flower stage. From tissue-specific expression analysis, CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGGPPS1 were predominantly expressed in petal and flower, whereas CpGPPS.SSU2, GPPS, and GGPPS2 showed a constitutive expression. Additionally, the subcellular localization assay identified the chloroplast localization of SSUs and GGPPSs proteins, and the yeast two-hybrid assay showed that both CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGPPS.SSU2 can interact with the GGPPS proteins. Taken together, these preliminary results suggest that the heterodimeric GPPS can regulate floral scent biosynthesis in wintersweet flower.

1. Introduction

The floral scent is one of the main features that define the aesthetic value of cut flowers and ornamental plants [1]. It is made up of the specialized metabolites of plants, which enable them to interact with their environment by attracting pollinators and repelling pests, such as herbivores, pathogens, and parasites [2]. The floral scent is the composite of different volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which mainly include terpenoids, phenylpropanoids, benzenoid compounds, and fatty acid derivatives [3]. Moreover, the content and composition of VOCs vary among species and contribute to their distinct fragrance [4]. Overall, terpenoids account for a range of secondary metabolites with numerous volatile constituents, which are derived from two interconvertible five-carbon (C5) precursors (isopentenyl diphosphate (IPP) and its allylic isomer, dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP)) [5]. These C5-isoprene building units are produced from two independent pathways: (1) the mevalonic acid pathway, which leads to the formation of sesquiterpenes; and (2) the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway, which contributes to the biosynthesis of monoterpenes and diterpenes [6].
In the MEP pathway, DMAPP and IPP molecules are condensed (head to tail) by the geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS), resulting in the formation of geranyl diphosphate (GPP) which is a universal precursor of monoterpenes. In several plant species, GPPSs have been characterized as heterodimeric and homodimeric forms [7,8]. Structurally, the heterodimeric GPPS is composed of one large subunit (LSU) and a small subunit (SSU) [9,10,11]. The LSU of heterodimeric GPPS shares high sequence similarity (50–75%) with the geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthases (GGPPS) and possess prenyltransferase activity, producing GGPP and often lower levels of GPP and FPP, while the SSU shares only 22–38% sequence similarity with the GGPPS and have no prenyltransferase activity [9]. The interaction of LSU with SSU causes a shift in the composition and content of the product, which normally favors the formation of GPP as compared to the activity displayed by the LSU alone. The homodimeric GPPS is catalytically active and produces GPP as a product [9,12,13]. Recent studies have shown the involvement of both homodimeric and heterodimeric GPPSs in monoterpenes formation in different plant species, such as Antirrhinum majus, Humulus lupulus, Clarkia breweri, Phlaenopsis bellina, Arabidopsis thaliana, and Mangifera indica [9,13,14,15,16,17]. Except for monoterpenes, there are also few reports which support the participation of homodimeric GPPS and heterodimeric GPPS in gibberellin and carotenoid biosynthesis in tomato and red pepper, respectively [7,18].
Wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox L.) is a diploid (2n = 22) deciduous flowering shrub and ornamental plant, which belongs to the family Calycanthaceae. It is native to China and has been cultivated as a garden and potted plant for the past 1000 years [19]. Moreover, its unique time to flower (November to March), distinct soothing scent, and prominent yellow color of flower enhance its ornamental values and make it a popular landscape, as well as a cut flower plant [19]. The scent of wintersweet flower is mainly dominated by volatile monoterpenoid, sesquiterpenoid, and benzenoid compounds [20]. However, less is known about their biosynthesis-related molecular mechanism(s). To date, only CpFPPS (farnesyl diphosphate synthase) and CpSAMT (salicylic acid carboxyl methyltransferase) have been investigated [21,22]. In addition, Tian et al. [23] used transcriptome and proteome approaches to identify potential genes responsible for differences in terpenoids and benzenoid compounds between wintersweet cultivars and suggested that GPPS might play an important role in regulating floral fragrance.
The present study aimed to screen all the potential unigenes as candidate CpGPPS/GGPPS genes from the transcriptome database of wintersweet plants [23] and further characterized these genes through expression analysis in wintersweet, followed by subcellular localization and protein interaction assays.

2. Results

2.1. Isolation of cDNAs Encoding CpGPPS/GGPPS

From the floral cDNA library of the C. praecox plant, eight cDNAs were found to be annotated as GPPS/GGPPS, of which five cDNAs had full-length open reading frames (ORF). Blast (blastp) results of these ORFs against the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp), and Sol genomics (https://solgenomics.net/) databases showed that three cDNAs (c81471, c64849, and c90672) have high sequence similarity with the known GPPS.SSU1, GPPS.SSU2, and homodimeric GPPS proteins from other plants, respectively (Table S1). Moreover, the remaining two cDNA (c80517 and c51170) are similar to the GGPPS protein.

2.2. Sequence Comparison, Gene Structure, and Phylogenetic Analysis

Multiple protein sequence alignment of the GPPS/GGPPS-like genes was performed with the MEGA 7 software. The results showed that the amino acid sequence of c90672, c80517, and c51170 contain the two highly conserved aspartate-rich regions [(FARM (DDX2–4D) and SARM (DDxxD)] (Figure S1C,D; Table 1), while c64849 has only a FARM motif (Figure S1B; Table 1). Moreover, the amino acid sequence of c81471 has none of these substrate binding motifs (Figure S1A; Table 1). Further comparison identified the two conserved CxxxC motifs in both c81471 and c64849 and one such motif in c80517 and c51170 similar to other plants (Figure S1A,B,D; Table 1). However, c90672 is free from the CxxxC motif, similar to other characterized homomeric GPPSs (Figure S1C; Table 1).
For evolutionary relationship analysis, GPPS/GGPPS sequences from various plant species were retrieved and used to build the phylogenetic tree. CpGPPS/GGPPS genes were classified into the four distinct clades, representing GPPS.SSU1, GPPS.SSU2, homodimeric GPPS, and GGPPS (Figure 1A). Moreover, GPPS.SSU1, GPPS.SSU2 and homodimeric GPPS contained one gene in each clade, while the GGPPS clade contained two genes (c80517 and c51170). Gene structure analysis displayed that c81471, c64849, c80517, and c51170 are intron-free genes, while c90672 contains 12 exons and 11 introns (Figure 1B). Based on their molecular characteristics these sequences were named CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 (Table 1).
The ORFs of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 encode predicted proteins of 306, 341, 428, 377, and 384 amino acids with a molecular weight of 33.00 kDa, 37.60 kDa, 46.84 kDa, 40.85 kDa, and 41.39 kDa and theoretical isoelectric point (pI) of 7.07, 5.75, 5.85, 6.47, and 5.97, respectively (Table 1).

2.3. Spatiotemporal Expression Pattern of CpGPPS/GGPPS Genes

In plants, the formation of VOCs is a spatially and developmentally regulated phenomenon [4,24,25]. The transcript level of CpGPPS/GGPPS genes was examined using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) in various plant tissues, including the stamen, pistil, petal, flower, and leaf. Relative expression levels of all the CpGPPS/GGPPS genes were compared with reference to the relative expression of CpGGPPS2 in the stamen. All the CpGPPS/GGPPS genes showed variation in the spatial expression intensities. Among the five genes, CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGGPPS1 showed the highest transcript, followed by CpGPPS, CpGPPS.SSU2, and CpGGPPS2. In detail, CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGGPPS1 genes were highly expressed in the petal and flower but had low expression levels in the leaf, pistil, and stamen. Moreover, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, and CpGGPPS2 were expressed in all the examined tissues, with high transcript levels in the petal (Figure 2).
The temporal expression analysis of CpGPPS/GGPPS genes in flowers revealed that all genes had the lowest expression levels in stage 1 (Figure 3). Moreover, the expression levels of all CpGPPS/GGPPS genes, except CpGGPPS2 genes, increased gradually and reached a peak in stage 4, whereas their expression levels were significantly decreased in stage 5 (Figure 3). Interestingly, a prominent change in the temporal expression profile was observed for CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGGPPS1 genes. Their level of expression was significantly increased in stage 4, which was approximately 245- and 35-time higher than that of stage 1, respectively (Figure 3).

2.4. Subcellular Localization of CpGPPS/GGPPS Genes

In silico study indicated the presence of putative transit peptide in CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 proteins with the chloroplast localization, while the CpGPPS protein was found to be localized in the mitochondria (Table 1). To validate, protein sequences of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGGPPS1, CpGGPPS2, and CpGPPS were fused to the N-terminus of the PRI101-EGFP vector, and these recombinant vectors were transiently expressed into the Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Through microscopy, the green fluorescent protein (GFP) fluorescence signals of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 were detected in the chloroplasts, whereas CpGPPS-GFP fusion protein fluorescence signals were detected in the mitochondria (Figure 4).

2.5. CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGPPS.SSU2 Interaction with GGPPS

To validate if the CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGPPS.SSU2 can interact with the GGPPS/GPPS.LSU to form a heterodimer, we performed the yeast 2 hybrid (Y2H) assay. The result revealed that yeast cells carrying the plasmid pairs BD-CpGPPS.SSU1 + AD-CpGGPPS2, BD-CpGPPS.SSU2 + AD-CpGGPPS2, BD-CpGPPS.SSU2 + AD-AtGGPPS11 and the positive control plasmid pair grew and turned blue on the QDO/X medium, indicating that the testing plasmid pair could interact and activate the reporter genes in the GAL4 system. On the other hand, yeast cells harboring the plasmid pairs, namely BD-CpGPPS.SSU1 + AD-CpGGPPS1, BD-CpGPPS.SSU2 + AD-CpGGPPS1, BD-CpGPPS.SSU1 + AD-AtGGPPS11, BD-CpGPPS.SSU1 + AD-empty, and BD-CpGPPS.SSU2 + AD-empty plasmid pairs and negative control could not grow and did not show any interaction on the QDO/X medium (Figure 5).

3. Discussion

Short-chain prenyl diphosphate synthases are enzymes of the isoprenoid pathway that use IPP and DMAPP to produce central intermediates in the isoprenoid metabolism. Short-chain prenyl diphosphate synthases are represented by three enzymes: GPPS, FPPS, and GGPPS [26]. Isolation and functional characterization of GPPSs from different plant species have confirmed the existence of homodimeric and heterodimeric forms, which are comprised of two similar subunits and one GPPS.SSU with one GPPS.LSU, respectively [15]. From the wintersweet transcriptome database [23], we isolated five transcripts that were annotated as GPPS/GGPPS-like genes: one homodimeric GPPS (CpGPPS), two GPPS small subunits (CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2), and two GGPPS (CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2) sequences (Table 1). Subsequent sequence analysis indicated that homodimeric CpGPPS and both CpGGPPSs have two conserved aspartate-rich motifs, containing FARM (DD(X)2–4D) and SARM (DDXXD) (Figure S1C,D; Table 1), which are essential for catalysis and substrate binding [27]. However, CpGPPS.SSUs lack one or both of these motifs (Figure S1A,B; Table 1). Besides, the CxxxC motif is needed for physical interaction between both subunits of heterodimeric GPPS [13,14,15]. In the present study, two CxxxC motifs were found in CpGPPS.SSUs and one motif in CpGGPPSs (Figure S1A,B,D; Table 1), which is consistent with the previous findings from other plant species.
The scent of the wintersweet flower is composed of different volatile compounds, of which α-linalool is the most abundant monoterpene volatile compound, accounting for about 36% of the wintersweet floral scent [28]. Moreover, the formation of monoterpenes possesses tissue specificity and is often related to the maturity of a given tissue [29,30]. The wintersweet flower develops a strong and specific fragrance during flower opening [31]. Further, wintersweet flowers contain the maximum number of scent-emitting nectaries at the fully opened flower stage. Dominantly, the maximum number of scent-emitting nectaries resides on petals during flower development [32]. In the present study, CpGPPS/GGPPS genes were expressed in all tested tissues, with varying levels (Figure 2). Namely, the CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGGPPS1 were highly expressed in the petal and flower, suggesting that these genes could have an important role in scent-producing tissues. Temporal expression analysis revealed that all CpGPPS/GGPPS genes, except CpGGPPS2, showed the maximum expression at fully opened flower stage, followed by reduction at the senescence stage (Figure 3). These expression profiles are consistent with the finding of Xiang et al. [21], who reported that the C. praecox L. ‘H29’ flowers had the maximum monoterpene contents at the partially opened (58.06%) and fully opened stage flowers (57.89%), followed by a sudden decline at senescence (9.44%). Overall, these results suggest that the spatiotemporal expression of CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGGPPS1 is strictly confined to the scent-emitting tissues with a good association to monoterpene contents. Moreover, Chen et al. (2015) reported the constitutive expression of AtGPPS.SSU2 and found its involvement in monoterpene biosynthesis [16]. This finding indicates that we cannot neglect the role of CpGPPS.SSU2 in scent biosynthesis in the wintersweet flower and suggest further investigations.
All genes/enzymes involved in the MEP pathway are known to have a transit peptide for their plastid targeting. The subcellular localization experiments in Catharanthus roseus and Litsea cubeba displayed the plastidial localization of GPPS/GGPPS [12,18,33]. On the other hand, there are few reports which support the mitochondrial, cytosolic, and endoplasmic reticulum localization of this pathway’s genes [26]. In the present study, the subcellular localization assay revealed that CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 proteins have strong GFP signals in the chloroplast region similar to the previous findings of GPPS.SSU1 from A. majus, GPPS.SSU2 from C. annuum and GGPPSs from A. thaliana [14,26]. However, the GFP fluorescence of CpGPPS protein was not observed in the chloroplast, likely because it is localized in the mitochondria (Figure 4), consistent with the previous result of homodimeric GPPS in C. roseus [12]. These results support the chloroplast localization of CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGPPS.SSU2 genes, further suggesting the functional involvement of these genes in monoterpene biosynthesis and metabolism.
In the heterodimeric GPPS gene, LSU is active and functional itself, while SSU is inactive and needs to interact with the LSU for functioning [9,12]. Through Y2H assay, both the CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGPPS.SSU2 showed interaction with CpGGPPS2. Moreover, CpGPPS.SSU2 also interacted with the AtGGPPS11 (Figure 5). These results support the possibility of heterodimeric GPPS existence in the wintersweet plant and warrant speculation that the SSU of heterodimeric GPPS could have a role in modifying or accelerating the product specificity of LSU or GGPPS. These assertions are consistent with previous suggestions. For instance, following the bacterial genetic complementation assay, when LiGPPS.SSU1 and LiGPPS.SSU2 were individually co-transformed with catalytically active LiGGPPS, both SSU interacted and reduced the carotenoid contents [34]. Moreover, when AmGPPS.SSU1 was transformed in tobacco, it act as a modifier and increases the GPP, as well as monoterpene biosynthesis, at the expense of GGPP-derived compounds, i.e., gibberellins, chlorophyll, and carotenoids [14]. On the other hand, MpGPPS.SSU1 act like an accelerator when overexpressed in tobacco, as it promotes shoot branching and early flowering by an elevated content of cytokinin and gibberellin. Wang et al. [18] reported that the virus-induced gene silencing of CaSSU2 led to a reduction in carotenoid content in red pepper fruit. However, the knowledge about this phenomenon remains unknown in wintersweet. In the future, all CpGPPS/GGPPS candidate genes need to be further investigated by exploiting techniques such as in vitro enzymatic assays and genetic transformation to obtain deeper insights.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and Sampling

A healthy and vigorous wintersweet plant (C. praecox L. ‘H29’) was selected as the study material. The experimental plant was grown under natural field conditions in the campus of Huazhong Agricultural University (Wuhan, China). Flower samples were collected at five developmental stages (stage 1 to stage 5), from bud development to senescence (Figure 6). In detail, flower developmental stages were characterized with the following distinct morphological characters: Closed bud with green petals (stage 1), closed bud with yellow petals (stage 2), partial open flower (stage 3), open flower but not pollinated (stage 4), and senescent flower (stage 5). For spatial expression analysis, the leaf, open flower, stamen, pistil, and petal samples were collected. All samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further use.

4.2. Database Mining and Sequencing of CpGPPS cDNAs

The GPPS/GGPPS sequences of A. thaliana and L. cubeba were used as a query to blast against the C. praecox genome database (unpublished), and the floral transcriptome database [23] to retrieve all the putative CpGPPS/GGPPS protein sequences from wintersweet. A blastp analysis of the retrieved CpGPPS/GGPPS protein sequences was carried out by searching against the NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Sol genomics (https://solgenomics.net/), and TAIR (https://www.arabidopsis.org/index.jsp) databases to find their homologs in other plant species. The largest ORF of CpGPPS/GGPPSs were amplified using the high-fidelity DNA polymerases (Vazyme, China) with gene-specific primers (Table S2). PCR was performed in a 50-µL reaction mixture comprising phanta max superfidelity DNA polymerases (11.5 μL, 1 unit/µL), forward and reverse primer (each 2.5 μL, 10 µM/µL), cDNA template (2 μL, 1 µg/µL) and ddH2O (31.5 μL) was subjected to the following PCR instructions: 95 °C for 5 min, and 35 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 45 s, and a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. The amplicons were purified using the Tiangel Midi Purification Kit (Tiangen, China) and cloned into a pEASY-T1 cloning vector (Transgen, China) for sequencing. The consistent sequencing results of each CpGPPS/GGPPSs were used for subsequent analysis.

4.3. Bioinformatics Analysis

The ORF of CpGPPS/GGPPSs were identified using the online tool ‘ORF finder’ (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gorf/gorf.html). Molecular weight and pI values of the putative proteins were predicted with the ExPASy tool (http://web.expasy.org/compute_pi/). The NCBI conserved domain tool (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/cdd/wrpsb.cgi) was used to identify the functional domains. TargetP 1.1 server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/), ChloroP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ChloroP/) and PSORT (http://psort.hgc.jp/) systems were used to predict the signal peptides and subcellular localization. Multiple sequence alignment of CpGPPS/GGPPS sequences, as well as the phylogenetic tree, was constructed using the MEGA 7 software, following the neighbor-joining method [35]. Gene structure was predicted using an online GSDS tool (http://gsds.cbi.pku.edu.cn/; Hu, et al. [36]).

4.4. RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted from different samples using the Hipure plant RNA purification kit (Magen Biotech, China), following the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of high-quality RNA was used to synthesize the first strand of cDNA using TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (TransGen Biotech, China). qRT-PCR was performed in the 10-µL reaction mixture comprising 5 µL of SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ II mix (Takara, Dalian, China), 0.3 µL of primer (forward and reverse each; the final concentration of 10 µM), 3.9 µL of ddH2O, and 0.5 µL of cDNA template with a final concentration of 300 ng/µL. The reactions were carried out using a Quant studio 7 flex real-time system (Applied Biosystems Life Technologies, New York), following the manufacturer’s protocol. The reaction was started with an initial incubation at 50 °C for 2 min and 95 °C for 5 min, then subjected to 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 20 s. qRT-PCR was performed in three biological replicates, and each biological replicate consisted of three technical replicates. Moreover, β-actin was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize the relative expression of target genes. Relative gene expression was analyzed following the 2–ΔΔCT method [37].

4.5. Subcellular Localization

For protein localization, we generated the green fluorescent fusion protein in frame with Sma1/EcoR1 cloning sites of the PRI101-EGFP vector driven by CaMV 35S promoter. The coding sequence of CpGPPS/GGPPSs were amplified (without stop codon) from C. praecox cDNA using gene-specific primers (Table S2). Amplified fragments were fused with the 5′ end of the GFP sequence to generate a cassette comprising of 35S-CpGPPSs-EGFP. The resulting constructs of CpGPPSs-EGFP fusion were sequenced to confirm the protein fusions. All the constructs were then transferred into A. tumefaciens strain (GV3101+p19) by a freeze-thaw method. Transformed Agrobacterium clone was grown in LB medium until the OD600 value reached 0.4–0.6 and was then used to infiltrate the leaves of 3–5-week-old N. benthamiana plants. The suspension solution was infiltrated on the lower surface of leaves using a 1-mL sterile needleless syringe, followed by a dark period for two days [38]. After 2–3 days of infiltration, the fluorescence signal of the GFP was examined at 488 nm under a confocal microscope (TCS-SP8, Leica, Germany).

4.6. Yeast 2-Hybrid Assay (Y2H)

The truncated versions of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGGPPS1, CpGGPPS2, and AtGGPPS11 without the predicted plastid target peptide were amplified and sequenced using the gene-specific primers (Table S2). The amplified fragments of CpGPPS.SSU1 and CpGPPS.SSU2 were cloned in frame with the binding domain (GAL4) of the pGBKT7 (bait) vector, while CpGGPPS1, CpGGPPS2, and AtGGPPS11 were introduced in frame with the activation domain (GAL4) of the PGADT7 (prey) vector to use in protein interaction evaluation. The respective pairs of bait and prey vectors were co-transformed into the yeast strain (AH109) by the LiAc/DNA/PEG method, following the Yeast Protocols Handbook from Clontech (http://www.clontech.com). Co-transformed AH109 cells were cultured on the synthetic dropout (SD) media without Leu and Trp, and the interaction/activation of two proteins was studied on the SD media lacking Leu, Trp, His, and Ade.

4.7. Statistical Analysis

The data were evaluated by the HSD post-hoc test in the ANOVA program of Statistix 8.1 (Florida, USA). Different lowercase letters on bars indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

Five GPPS/GGPPS genes (CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2) were isolated in wintersweet flower. qRT-PCR results showed that the expression of CpGPPS.SSU1 was predominantly confined to the fragrance-producing tissues and was upregulated during flower development, indicating important roles in floral volatile emission. In addition, the present data confirm that both CpGPPS.SSUs can interact with GGPPS-like proteins, and localization experiments further support the presence of chloroplast localized heterodimeric GPPS in the wintersweet flower. Collectively, the present data warrant consideration of heterodimeric GPPS.SSU as a target for the manipulation of floral scent production. Further studies will better define the modes of regulation and confirm the roles of heterodimeric GPPS in wintersweet flower scent production.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/5/666/s1, Table S1: Protein sequence homology of CpGPPS/GGPPSs. Table S2: List of primers used in this study. Figure S1: Multiple sequence alignment of deduced amino acid of GPPS.SSU1 (A), GPPS.SSU2 (B), homodimeric GPPS (C) and GGPPS (D) like proteins from wintersweet.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.M.K. and L.-Q.C.; methodology, H.M.K.; software, H.M.K. and S.B.H.; validation, H.M.K.; formal analysis, H.M.K. and S.J.; investigation, H.M.K.; resources, L.X.; writing—original draft preparation, H.M.K.; writing—review and editing, S.B.H. and L.-Q.C.; supervision, L.-Q.C. and L.X.; project administration, L.-Q.C.; funding acquisition, L.-Q.C. and L.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), grant number 31572165 and 31860229” and “the Thousand Talents Plan of Yunnan Province-High-End Foreign Experts, grant number 000019”.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Xiaoyu Qu for technical support with confocal microscopy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pichersky, E.; Dudareva, N. Scent engineering: Toward the goal of controlling how flowers smell. Trends Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Dudareva, N.; Klempien, A.; Muhlemann, J.K.; Kaplan, I. Biosynthesis, function and metabolic engineering of plant volatile organic compounds. New Phytol. 2013, 198, 16–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dudareva, N.; Pichersky, E. Biochemical and molecular genetic aspects of floral scents. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Knudsen, J.T.; Eriksson, R.; Gershenzon, J.; Ståhl, B. Diversity and distribution of floral scent. Bot. Rev. 2006, 72, 1. [Google Scholar]
  5. McGarvey, D.J.; Croteau, R. Terpenoid metabolism. Plant Cell 1995, 7, 1015–1026. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Vranova, E.; Coman, D.; Gruissem, W. Network analysis of the MVA and MEP pathways for isoprenoid synthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2013, 64, 665–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Van Schie, C.C.; Ament, K.; Schmidt, A.; Lange, T.; Haring, M.A.; Schuurink, R.C. Geranyl diphosphate synthase is required for biosynthesis of gibberellins. Plant J. 2007, 52, 752–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Schmidt, A.; Gershenzon, J. Cloning and characterization of two different types of geranyl diphosphate synthases from Norway spruce (Picea abies). Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tholl, D.; Kish, C.M.; Orlova, I.; Sherman, D.; Gershenzon, J.; Pichersky, E.; Dudareva, N. Formation of monoterpenes in Antirrhinum majus and Clarkia breweri flowers involves heterodimeric geranyl diphosphate synthases. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 977–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nagegowda, D.A. Plant volatile terpenoid metabolism: Biosynthetic genes, transcriptional regulation and subcellular compartmentation. FEBS Lett. 2010, 584, 2965–2973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Lackus, N.D.; Petersen, N.P.; Nagel, R.; Schmidt, A.; Irmisch, S.; Gershenzon, J.; Köllner, T.G. Identification and Characterization of trans-Isopentenyl Diphosphate Synthases Involved in Herbivory-Induced Volatile Terpene Formation in Populus trichocarpa. Molecules 2019, 24, 2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rai, A.; Smita, S.S.; Singh, A.K.; Shanker, K.; Nagegowda, D.A. Heteromeric and homomeric geranyl diphosphate synthases from Catharanthus roseus and their role in monoterpene indole alkaloid biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1531–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, G.; Dixon, R.A. Heterodimeric geranyl (geranyl) diphosphate synthase from hop (Humulus lupulus) and the evolution of monoterpene biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 9914–9919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Orlova, I.; Nagegowda, D.A.; Kish, C.M.; Gutensohn, M.; Maeda, H.; Varbanova, M.; Fridman, E.; Yamaguchi, S.; Hanada, A.; Kamiya, Y.; et al. The Small Subunit of Snapdragon Geranyl Diphosphate Synthase Modifies the Chain Length Specificity of Tobacco Geranylgeranyl Diphosphate Synthase in Planta. Plant Cell 2009, 21, 4002–4017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Hsiao, Y.Y.; Jeng, M.F.; Tsai, W.C.; Chuang, Y.C.; Li, C.Y.; Wu, T.S.; Kuoh, C.S.; Chen, W.H.; Chen, H.H. A novel homodimeric geranyl diphosphate synthase from the orchid Phalaenopsis bellina lacking a DD (X) 2–4D motif. Plant J. 2008, 55, 719–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chen, Q.; Fan, D.; Wang, G. Heteromeric geranyl (geranyl) diphosphate synthase is involved in monoterpene biosynthesis in Arabidopsis flowers. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1434–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kulkarni, R.; Pandit, S.; Chidley, H.; Nagel, R.; Schmidt, A.; Gershenzon, J.; Pujari, K.; Giri, A.; Gupta, V. Characterization of three novel isoprenyl diphosphate synthases from the terpenoid rich mango fruit. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 71, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, Q.; Huang, X.-Q.; Cao, T.-J.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, R.; Lu, S. Heteromeric geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase contributes to carotenoid biosynthesis in ripening fruits of red pepper (Capsicum annuum var. conoides). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 11691–11700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, K.-G.; Zhou, M.-Q.; Chen, L.-Q.; Zhang, D.; Robert, G.W. Genetic diversity and discrimination of Chimonanthus praecox (L.) Link germplasm using ISSR and RAPD markers. HortScience 2007, 42, 1144–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Deng, C.; Song, G.; Hu, Y. Rapid determination of volatile compounds emitted from Chimonanthus praecox flowers by HS-SPME-GC-MS. Z. Naturforsch. C J. Biosci. 2004, 59, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xiang, L.; Zhao, K.; Chen, L. Molecular cloning and expression of Chimonanthus praecox farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase gene and its possible involvement in the biosynthesis of floral volatile sesquiterpenoids. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 845–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ma, L.; Li, H.; Peng, C.; Chen, Z.; Long, Z. Cloning of SAMT gene cDNA from Chimonanthus praecox and its expression in Escherichia coli. Agric. Sci. Technol. Hunan 2012, 13, 82–87. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tian, J.P.; Ma, Z.Y.; Zhao, K.G.; Zhang, J.; Xiang, L.; Chen, L.Q. Transcriptomic and proteomic approaches to explore the differences in monoterpene and benzenoid biosynthesis between scented and unscented genotypes of wintersweet. Physiol. Plant. 2019, 166, 478–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Vassão, D.G.; Gang, D.R.; Koeduka, T.; Jackson, B.; Pichersky, E.; Davin, L.B.; Lewis, N.G. Chavicol formation in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum): Cleavage of an esterified C9 hydroxyl group with NAD (P) H-dependent reduction. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006, 4, 2733–2744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dudareva, N.; Murfitt, L.M.; Mann, C.J.; Gorenstein, N.; Kolosova, N.; Kish, C.M.; Bonham, C.; Wood, K. Developmental regulation of methyl benzoate biosynthesis and emission in snapdragon flowers. Plant Cell 2000, 12, 949–961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Beck, G.; Coman, D.; Herren, E.; Ruiz-Sola, M.A.; Rodríguez-Concepción, M.; Gruissem, W.; Vranová, E. Characterization of the GGPP synthase gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2013, 82, 393–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Kellogg, B.A.; Poulter, C.D. Chain elongation in the isoprenoid biosynthetic pathway. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 1997, 1, 570–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Azuma, H.; Toyota, M.; Asakawa, Y. Floral scent chemistry and stamen movement of Chimonanthus praecox (L.) Link (Calycanthaceae). Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 2005, 56, 197–201. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kim, Y.-J.; Lee, O.R.; Oh, J.Y.; Jang, M.-G.; Yang, D.-C. Functional analysis of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase encoding genes in triterpene saponin-producing ginseng. Plant Physiol. 2014, 165, 373–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Xue, L.; He, Z.; Bi, X.; Xu, W.; Wei, T.; Wu, S.; Hu, S. Transcriptomic profiling reveals MEP pathway contributing to ginsenoside biosynthesis in Panax ginseng. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, D.; Sui, S.; Ma, J.; Li, Z.; Guo, Y.; Luo, D.; Yang, J.; Li, M. Transcriptomic analysis of flower development in wintersweet (Chimonanthus praecox). PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Li, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, D.; Ma, J.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Sui, S. Floral Scent Emission from Nectaries in the Adaxial Side of the Innermost and Middle Petals in Chimonanthus praecox. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Zhao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Gao, M.; Yin, H.; Wu, L.; Wang, Y. Overexpression of geranyl diphosphate synthase small subunit 1 (LcGPPS. SSU1) enhances the monoterpene content and biomass. Ind. Crops Prod. 2020, 143, 111926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Adal, A.M.; Mahmoud, S.S. Short-chain isoprenyl diphosphate synthases of lavender (Lavandula). Plant Mol. Biol. 2020, 102, 517–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Hu, B.; Jin, J.; Guo, A.-Y.; Zhang, H.; Luo, J.; Gao, G. GSDS 2.0: An upgraded gene feature visualization server. Bioinformatics 2015, 31, 1296–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2− ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sparkes, I.A.; Runions, J.; Kearns, A.; Hawes, C. Rapid, transient expression of fluorescent fusion proteins in tobacco plants and generation of stably transformed plants. Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 09 00666 g001 550
Figure 1. Phylogenetic and gene structure analysis of the wintersweet geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS)/geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (GGPPS). (A) The phylogenetic tree was generated by the neighbor-joining method using the MEGA 7.0, after alignment of deduced amino acid sequences by ClustalW. Numbers in the nodes are the bootstrap support values from 1000 replicates. The accession numbers are given in parenthesis. (B) Schematic genomic structure of CpGPPS/GGPPS genes. The green box represents the exon and the black lines between them denote intron. The dark orange box represents the untranslated region.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic and gene structure analysis of the wintersweet geranyl diphosphate synthase (GPPS)/geranylgeranyl diphosphate synthase (GGPPS). (A) The phylogenetic tree was generated by the neighbor-joining method using the MEGA 7.0, after alignment of deduced amino acid sequences by ClustalW. Numbers in the nodes are the bootstrap support values from 1000 replicates. The accession numbers are given in parenthesis. (B) Schematic genomic structure of CpGPPS/GGPPS genes. The green box represents the exon and the black lines between them denote intron. The dark orange box represents the untranslated region.
Plants 09 00666 g001
Plants 09 00666 g002 550
Figure 2. Spatial expression profiles of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 in the wintersweet plant. β-Actin was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize gene expression.
Figure 2. Spatial expression profiles of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 in the wintersweet plant. β-Actin was used as a housekeeping gene to normalize gene expression.
Plants 09 00666 g002
Plants 09 00666 g003 550
Figure 3. Temporal expression profile of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 in different developmental stages of the wintersweet flower. Different lowercase letters on bars indicate significant differences among tissues at p < 0.05 based on HSD post-hoc test. S1: Closed bud with green petals, S2: Closed bud with yellow petals, S3: Partial open flower, S4: Open flower but not pollinated, S5: Senescent flower.
Figure 3. Temporal expression profile of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 in different developmental stages of the wintersweet flower. Different lowercase letters on bars indicate significant differences among tissues at p < 0.05 based on HSD post-hoc test. S1: Closed bud with green petals, S2: Closed bud with yellow petals, S3: Partial open flower, S4: Open flower but not pollinated, S5: Senescent flower.
Plants 09 00666 g003
Plants 09 00666 g004 550
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 in the N. benthamiana leaves. GFP signals from the adaxial leaf surface were observed by using a confocal laser scanning microscope. GFP, green fluorescence image; Autofluorescence, chlorophyll autofluorescence image; Merge, overlay of GFP and autofluorescence.
Figure 4. Subcellular localization of CpGPPS.SSU1, CpGPPS.SSU2, CpGPPS, CpGGPPS1, and CpGGPPS2 in the N. benthamiana leaves. GFP signals from the adaxial leaf surface were observed by using a confocal laser scanning microscope. GFP, green fluorescence image; Autofluorescence, chlorophyll autofluorescence image; Merge, overlay of GFP and autofluorescence.
Plants 09 00666 g004
Plants 09 00666 g005 550
Figure 5. Interaction of CpGPPS.SSUs with CpGGPPSs and AtGGPPS11. (A) Key: 1, BD-CpSSU1 + AD-empty; 2, BD-CpSSU1 + AD-CpGGPPS1; 3, BD-CpSSU1 + AD- CpGGPPS2; 4, BD-CpSSU1 + AD-AtGGPPS11; 5, BD-Lam + AD-Rec-T (negative control); 6, BD-53 + AD-Rec-T (positive control); 7, BD-CpSSU2 + AD-CpGGPPS1; 8, BD-CpSSU2 + AD-CpGGPPS2; 9, BD-CpSSU2 + AD- AtGGPPS11; 10, BD-CpSSU2 + AD-empty. (B) The CpGPPS.SSUs were fused with the DNA binding domain (BD) of PGBKT7 and GGPPSs were fused with the activation domain (AD) of the PGADT7 vector. Yeast strain AH109 co-transformed pairwise with both binding and activation vectors and spotted on the minimal synthetic dropout (SD) medium without leucine and tryptophan. (C) Yeast strains relative to those in the left panel were spotted on the SD medium lacking adenine, histidine, leucine, and tryptophan supplied with X-α-Gal.
Figure 5. Interaction of CpGPPS.SSUs with CpGGPPSs and AtGGPPS11. (A) Key: 1, BD-CpSSU1 + AD-empty; 2, BD-CpSSU1 + AD-CpGGPPS1; 3, BD-CpSSU1 + AD- CpGGPPS2; 4, BD-CpSSU1 + AD-AtGGPPS11; 5, BD-Lam + AD-Rec-T (negative control); 6, BD-53 + AD-Rec-T (positive control); 7, BD-CpSSU2 + AD-CpGGPPS1; 8, BD-CpSSU2 + AD-CpGGPPS2; 9, BD-CpSSU2 + AD- AtGGPPS11; 10, BD-CpSSU2 + AD-empty. (B) The CpGPPS.SSUs were fused with the DNA binding domain (BD) of PGBKT7 and GGPPSs were fused with the activation domain (AD) of the PGADT7 vector. Yeast strain AH109 co-transformed pairwise with both binding and activation vectors and spotted on the minimal synthetic dropout (SD) medium without leucine and tryptophan. (C) Yeast strains relative to those in the left panel were spotted on the SD medium lacking adenine, histidine, leucine, and tryptophan supplied with X-α-Gal.
Plants 09 00666 g005
Plants 09 00666 g006 550
Figure 6. Flower development stages in wintersweet. S1: Closed bud with green petals, S2: Closed bud with yellow petals, S3: Partial open flower, S4: Open flower but not pollinated, S5: Senescent flower. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 6. Flower development stages in wintersweet. S1: Closed bud with green petals, S2: Closed bud with yellow petals, S3: Partial open flower, S4: Open flower but not pollinated, S5: Senescent flower. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Plants 09 00666 g006
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of CpGPPS/GGPPS genes.
Table 1. Characteristics of CpGPPS/GGPPS genes.
Gene/cDNA NameORF Length (aa)Theoretical pI ValueMolecular Weight (kDa)In Silico Subcellular Localization PredictionConserved Motif
CpGPPS.SSU1/c814713067.0733.00ChloroplastCxxxC, CxxxC
CpGPPS.SSU2/c648493415.7537.60ChloroplastCxxC, DDX(2–4)D, CxxxC
CpGPPS/c906724285.8546.84MitochondriaDDX(2–4)D, DDxxD
CpGGPPS1/c805173776.4740.85ChloroplastCxxxC, DDX(2–4)D, DDxxD
CpGGPPS2/c511703845.9741.39ChloroplastCxxxC, DDX(2–4)D, DDxxD

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kamran, H.M.; Hussain, S.B.; Junzhong, S.; Xiang, L.; Chen, L.-Q. Identification and Molecular Characterization of Geranyl Diphosphate Synthase (GPPS) Genes in Wintersweet Flower. Plants 2020, 9, 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050666

AMA Style

Kamran HM, Hussain SB, Junzhong S, Xiang L, Chen L-Q. Identification and Molecular Characterization of Geranyl Diphosphate Synthase (GPPS) Genes in Wintersweet Flower. Plants. 2020; 9(5):666. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050666

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kamran, Hafiz Muhammad, Syed Bilal Hussain, Shang Junzhong, Lin Xiang, and Long-Qing Chen. 2020. "Identification and Molecular Characterization of Geranyl Diphosphate Synthase (GPPS) Genes in Wintersweet Flower" Plants 9, no. 5: 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9050666

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop