Next Article in Journal
Correction: Helal et al. Improving Yield Components and Desirable Eating Quality of Two Wheat Genotypes Using Si and NanoSi Particles under Heat Stress. Plants 2022, 11, 1819
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Seasonal Changes on Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Physiological Characteristics in the Two Taxus Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 12
Issue 14
10.3390/plants12142635
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Anatomy and Histochemistry of the Vegetative System of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr. (Orchidaceae), a Potential Medicinal Species

by
Igor Soares dos Santos
1,* and
Marcos José da Silva
2
1
Post-Graduate Program in Plant Biology, Department of Botany, Institute of Biosciences, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Botucatu 18618-970, SP, Brazil
2
Laboratory of Molecular Systematics and Plant Taxonomy, Department of Botany, Institute of Biological Science, Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia 74001-970, GO, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2023, 12(14), 2635; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142635
Submission received: 5 June 2023 / Revised: 1 July 2023 / Accepted: 3 July 2023 / Published: 13 July 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The orchid genus Brachystele Schltr. (Orchidoideae, Cranichideae, Spiranthinae) comprises 20 species distributed from Mexico to Argentina, with 10 species found in Brazil. Anatomical studies of Orchidoideae Lindl. have been scarce, and the anatomy and histochemistry of Brachystele are still largely unknown. In this study, we conducted a characterization of the vegetative organs of B. guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr. using standard anatomical and histochemical microtechniques. In this study, we provide the first information about the anatomy and histochemistry of Brachystele. The studied species was observed to display anatomical characters commonly found in the vegetative organs of representatives of the Cranichideae tribe (e.g., uniseriate epidermis; homogeneous mesophyll with 6–11 layers; rhizomes with rings of fibers; vascular bundles in the form of “^” or “v”; fleshy roots with uniseriate velamen, simple trichomes, and spiranthosomes). Others can be interpreted as adaptive strategies conditioned by the environment and their terrestrial life form (e.g., cuticle thickness; amphistomatic leaves; roots with reduced velamen compared to the cortex (18–20 layers); and raphides). In this study, cataphylls, and the presence of spiranthosomes in leaves, including stomatal guard cells, as well as alkaloids in these structures, are anatomically described for the first time in Orchidaceae. The presence of hyphae and pelotons in the stem of B. guayanensis is described for the first time in Cranichideae. Histochemical tests confirmed the presence of lignin, proteins, and alkaloids, the lipidic nature of the cuticle, starch grains stored in spiranthosomes, and the composition of the raphides. Alkaloids were observed in abundance, particularly in the roots, suggesting a potential role in defense against pathogens and herbivores, as well as potential medicinal activities, as seen in phylogenetically related groups to Brachystele.

1. Introduction

Orchidoideae Lindl. (Orchidaceae) is monophyletic and comprises approximately 3650 species and 208 genera, distributed throughout the temperate and tropical regions of the Old and New World [1,2]. In Brazil, there are approximately 363 species and 35 genera, with 205 species being endemic [3]. It is characterized by the presence of terrestrial species with an erect fertile anther, usually with sectile pollinae [4]. In addition to bringing together economically important species cultivated around the globe, especially for their potential as ornamental, food, and medicinal plants, particularly in the Old World [5,6,7], Orchidoideae are morphologically and anatomically diverse [1,2,8], presenting the species with interesting interactions with symbiotic microorganisms (e.g., fungi), as well as a range of adaptive strategies conditioned to the heterogeneous types of environments they occupy and to the interactions between biotic species, such as their pollinators, among others [1,8,9]. Additionally, they possess a wide range of biologically active substances [5,6,7].
In anatomical terms, Orchidoideae is poorly studied since most of the species sampled in previous studies [8,10] occur outside the neotropical region—one of its centers of diversity—where many of its species are endemic [1,2] and are subject to conditions and environmental factors that differ from other parts of the world. Although the phytochemistry of some species is relatively known, especially those occurring in the Old World [5,7,11], they are used in the treatment of various diseases because they have compounds with biological activities (e.g., anti-inflammatory, anti-Hepatitis B, neuroprotective, anti-tumor, antioxidant, among others), thus highlighting their potential as medicinal plants. Studies with this aspect are scarce in the neotropical region, especially in Brazil [12,13], as well as those directed to the histochemistry of the vegetative organs of their representatives [14,15,16], showing an important gap for the development of promising studies with different aspects in Orchidaceae in general.
Among the genus of Orchidoideae, Brachystele Schltr. (Cranichideae, Spiranthinae) comprises 20 species distributed from southern Mexico to northern Argentina [17]; 10 species occur in Brazil, of which three are endemic [3]. The taxon is terrestrial, herbaceous, with short rhizomes, fleshy roots, leaves arranged in rosettes, lateral racemes with small flowers, resupinate, usually indumented, with a bilobed stigma [3,17].
Anatomical descriptions of the vegetative organs of Brachystele are currently limited to the work of Bernal et al. [15], who examined the root trichomes of representatives of Spiranthinae Lindl. ex Meisn. as well as B. widgrenii (Rchb.f.) Schltr. However, there have been no histochemical studies of any Brachystele species, although some medicinal properties of B. dilatata (Lindl.) Schltr. and B. unilateralis (Poir.) Schltr. were mentioned (e.g., their diuretic and carminative property) in ethnobotanical studies [18,19].
We provide here anatomical and histochemical characterizations of the vegetative organs of B. guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr. (Figure 1).

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Anatomical Data

2.1.1. Leaf Anatomy

In frontal view, the leaf epidermis of B. guayanensis is covered by a striated cuticle (Figure 2a,b). It is composed of polygonal cells with both straight and curved walls (Figure 2a,b)—characters that have also been reported for Microchilus arietinus (Rchb. f. and Warm.) Ormerod and Zeuxine strateumatica (L.) Schltr. by Andreota et al. [20] and Bona et al. [16] and described for Aa paleacea (Kunth) Rchb. f. and Pterichis multiflora (Lindl.) Schltr. by Corredor and Arias [21]. Anomocytic stomata were observed on both faces of the leaf blade of B. guayanensis (Figure 2a,b), similar to other species in the Orchidaceae family [8,22,23].
In cross-section, the epidermis of B. guayanensis is covered by a thin, striated cuticle. It is uniseriate and composed of rounded, oblong cells with slightly thickened external periclinal walls (Figure 2c,d)—aspects reported for other members of tribes Diurideae Endl. [24], Orchideae Small [25,26,27], and Cranichideae [16,20,21]. The leaves are amphistomatic (Figure 2c–e), with stomata at the same level as common cells of the epidermis. The substomatal chambers are wider than the suprastomatal chambers (Figure 2c,d)—characteristics related to reducing water losses and evapotranspiration [28,29]. Amphistomatic leaves are commonly observed in plants that have both high photosynthetic capacities and high stomatal conductance, especially those that grow in open and sunny environments [30,31], as studied here.
The mesophyll of B. guayanensis is homogeneous and consists of 6–11 layers of rounded cells with varying dimensions (Figure 2e). These cells are interspersed with crystalliferous idioblasts containing raphides (Figure 2f)—a pattern cited for different groups of Orchidaceae [8,10,23]. Collateral vascular bundles surrounded by a parenchyma sheath were observed in the median portion of the mesophyll (Figure 2e). The bundle corresponding to the midrib is flat-convex (Figure 2g) and has the largest caliber; the elements of that vessel are arranged in a “^” (Figure 2h). Smaller bundles (Figure 2i) with smaller calibers are interspersed. This same pattern has been reported in other taxa by the authors cited above. The leaf margins of B. guayanensis are straight and rounded (Figure 2j).

2.1.2. Rhizome Anatomy

The anatomy of the rhizomes of B. guayanensis was observed to be similar to other representatives of Orchidoideae [8,21,23] in having rounded outlines and variable calibers (Figure 3a,b), with cataphylls in nodal regions or protecting the buds (Figure 3b,c). Cataphylls, whose anatomy is first described for Orchidaceae, have a uniseriate epidermis composed of quadrangular cells covered by a thin cuticle, and stomata facing the external portion (Figure 3b,c). The mesophyll is homogeneous, consisting of 6–8 layers, and contains collateral vascular bundles in the form of “^” (Figure 3b,c). The epidermis of the rhizomes is covered by a smooth, thin cuticle, and is uniseriate. It is composed of oblong, or occasionally, rounded common cells with thin cell walls (Figure 3d). Stomata were only observed on the exposed portions of the rhizome and were arranged at the same level as the other common cells, with only tiny substomatal and suprastomatal chambers (Figure 3d).
The cortex of B. guayanensis is surrounded by a fiber ring (Figure 3a,b,h) and consists of 16–22 layers of rounded parenchyma cells of varying sizes (Figure 3a,b) with small triangular intercellular spaces. Some of the parenchyma cells contain raphides (Figure 3e) and tiny starch grains enveloped by two limiting membranes and gathered in spiranthosomes (Figure 3f)—spherical specialized amyloplasts found in Cranichideae and interpreted as a synapomorphy of the tribe and are associated with nutrients storage [16,20,32]. While it is not entirely clear, some authors [33,34] attribute the polyhedral form of spiranthosomes to intracellular density. However, others believe that such structures reflect shared genetic factors and phylogenetic characters [35]. Furthermore, we believe that the presence of membranes surrounding the tiny starch grains possibly regulates the hydrolysis process, as well as the availability of sugars for the symbiotic fungi.
The arrangement of the fundamental tissue is similar to that described by Stern [8] and by Stern and Judd [36,37] for the aerial stems of other Orchidaceae groups (such as Vanilloideae [36,37]; Orchidoideae, tribes Diseae Dressler and Orchideae Small; and Epidendroideae Lindl., tribes Sobralieae Pfitzer and Triphoreae Dressler [8,38]), as well as other groups of Monocotyledons [39]. Although the endodermis (with Casparian strips) and/or pericycle are not very distinct, unlike other Cranichideae [8,16] as described here (Figure 3b), they may participate in the genesis of adventitious roots and therefore exhibit meristematic activity [39].
Fungal hyphae and pelotons were observed to be concentrated mainly in the more peripheral portions of the cortical parenchyma (Figure 3g), which aligns with the findings of Pereira et al. [40] for the roots of Bulbophyllum sp., Campylocentrum organense (Rchb.f.) Rolfe and Gomesa crispa (Lindl.) Klotzsch ex Rchb. f. According to these authors, the strategic positions of these structures contribute to the maintenance and (re)colonization of internal tissues, serving as important sources of inoculum for adventitious roots extending from the rhizome, corroborating the findings of Pridgeon [41] for terrestrial orchids of Orchidoideae (tribe Diurideae), and of Bougoure et al. [42], Uma et al. [43] and Suetsugu et al. [44] for Epidendroideae (Eulophia epidendraea C.E.C. Fisch., Malaxis acuminata D. Don, Oreorchis indica (Lindl.) Hook. f. and Rhizanthella gardneri R.S. Rogers). Such structures were also found in the rhizomes of epiphytic and rupicolous orchids of the Epidendroideae (Promenaea rollisonii (Rchb. f.) Lindl. and P. xanthina Lindl.) by Pedroso-de-Moraes et al. [45]. In this study, the presence of hyphae and pelotons in the stem of B. guayanensis is first reported for Cranichideae. According to some authors [46,47,48], the presence of mycorrhizae can act as extensions of the root system, maximizing the absorption and translocation of nutrients by plants (e.g., phosphorus, potassium, phosphate, manganese, and nitrogen), including copper and zinc, in addition to other immobile nutrients present in the soil [49,50,51]. Moreover, fungi improve structure, stability, and water retention in the soil [52]; increase tolerance to abiotic stresses [46], and contribute to the absorption of amino acids, ammonia, and nitrate from the rhizosphere, making these elements available in inorganic form to the host plant [48].
Between 28 and 45 scattered collateral vascular bundles can be observed internally, surrounded by a parenchyma sheath (Figure 3i), which is typical of Monocots [30,53,54]. These bundles are observed in the central portion of the organ analyzed (Figure 3a,b,i), and have been observed in other groups of the Orchidaceae family [8,36,37]. The vessel elements of the xylem are arranged in “V” formations within the collateral vascular bundles (Figure 3j), consistent with the findings of Andreota [55] for the tribe Cranichideae.

2.1.3. Root Anatomy

Brachystele guayanensis has transversely circular roots of variable calibers (Figure 4a), which are anatomically similar to those found in other taxa of Cranichideae tribe [20,21,56]. These roots possess a uniseriate velamen of the “Spiranthes type”. The component cells are irregular, elliptic, and thin, with thin cell walls with helicoidal thickenings and small pores in the non-thickened regions (Figure 4b,c). Our observations align with those of Porembski and Barthlott [57] for Pelexia dolichorhiza Schltr. (=Pachygenium pteryganthum (Rchb. f. and Warm.) Szlach., R. González and Rutk.), Prescottia colorans Lindl. (=P. stachyoides (Sw.) Lindl.), and Sauroglossum elatum Lindl. Moreira and Isaias [58] reported that terrestrial orchids generally have thinner velamen compared to epiphytic or rupicolous species in terms of their numbers of layers. Moreira and Isaias [58], Pridgeon [59], and Chomicki et al. [60] noted that velamen serves multiple functions, such as protecting the roots from high solar radiation levels and excessive evapotranspiration losses, preventing overheating, and providing mechanical support to internal tissues, among others.
Simple, unicellular trichomes, such as those observed here (Figure 4c), were reported for: Brachystele widgrenii, Lankesterella caespitosa (Lindl.) Hoehne, L. ceracifolia (Barb. Rodr.) Mansf., Pelexia orthosepala (Rchb.f. and Warm.) Schltr, and Sacoila lanceolata (Aubl.) Garay. by Bernal et al. [15]; for Cranichis candida (Barb. Rodr.) Cogn. by Andreota et al. [20]; and for 11 species of Aspidogyne Garay and Microchilus C. Presl. by Bona et al. [16]. According to Stern et al. [8], Andreota et al. [20], and Bernal et al. [15], simple trichomes provide better attachment to the substrate and increase contact with that surface, thereby facilitating the absorption of water and mineral salts.
The root cortex consists of 18–20 layers of rounded parenchyma cells of varying sizes with innumerable small, triangular intercellular spaces (Figure 4d). In addition, the presence of hyphae and pelotons is observed, primarily concentrated in the more peripheral regions and underlying the exodermis (Figure 4d,g,h). Similar patterns have been reported in the roots of other Orchidaceae species by Pereira et al. [40]. The presence of symbiotic microorganisms in these roots is crucial for orchid seed germination, as they increase the surface area of the roots, thereby facilitating water and nutrient absorption [50,61]. For more detailed information, please refer to Section 2.1.2.
These characters are frequently observed in Orchidoideae [8,21,56]. In terrestrial orchids, including the species studied here, the roots are typically thick and fleshy, with a less expressive velamen and more pronounced cortex in terms of the number of layers. It is responsible for holding reserves of water, starch grains, and other nutrients. Within the cortical parenchyma, some cells contain raphides (Figure 4e), a feature observed in various groups of Monocotyledons, including Orchidaceae [53]. Additionally, polyhedral starch grains are found in spiranthosomes (Figure 4f), which are typical amyloplasts in Cranichideae [16,20,32].
The exodermis (Figure 4b,c), endodermis, and pericycle (Figure 4k) of B. guayanensis are uniseriate and composed of rounded, elliptical cells with thin walls. The cells of the exodermis are slightly thickened (Figure 4b,c) and the endodermis cells have evident Casparian strips (Figure 4k). Similar patterns can be observed in other terrestrial orchids, particularly in the subfamily Orchidoideae, such as in Orchideae [27] and Cranichideae [16,20,21].
The vascular cylinders in the roots of B. guayanensis exhibit variable calibers and can have circular or elliptic shapes. They also possess 12–14 protoxylem poles (Figure 4i,j), categorizing these roots as polyarchs, a common feature in Monocotyledons [30,54]. The xylem and phloem are interspersed within the vascular cylinder (Figure 4i–k). The central portion of the vascular cylinder is composed of parenchyma cells of varying sizes and shapes with tiny triangular intercellular spaces (Figure 4i,j), similar to those observed in other groups of Orchidaceae [8,23,56].

2.2. Histochemistry Data

Coomassie blue and xylidine ponceau strongly stained the pelotons and hyphae, indicating their protein contents (Figure 5a,b). Sudan IV staining confirmed the lipidic nature of the waxy cuticle (Figure 5c), and the raphides were composed of calcium oxalate. Lignin was identified in the walls of xylem vessel elements (Figure 5d,f,g) and fiber rings (Figure 5e), as well as in Casparian strips (Figure 5g). Starch grains and alkaloids were identified within the stomata guard cells (Figure 5h,o), epidermal cells, mesophyll cells (especially in the vicinity of vascular bundles) (Figure 5i,j,p), the cortical parenchyma of rhizomes (and occasionally in the central portion) (Figure 5k,l,q,r), as well as in roots (where they were most abundant) (Figure 5m,n,s–u). The histochemical tests were negative for reducing sugars, phenolic compounds, and tannins.
The waxy cuticle performs several functions, including protection against solar radiation, overheating, and water loss from internal tissues. It also provides protection against the entry and attacks of pathogens and herbivores [62,63,64].
Calcium oxalate raphides, found in different groups of Orchidaceae and other Angiosperms [8,65], serve as defenses against herbivores, act in osmoregulation and in other metabolic activities requiring calcium, and have a role in the detoxification of aluminum, which is abundant in savanna soils, such as the red latosol (Oxisol) where the studied species grew [65,66].
Lignin, commonly deposited in vessel elements, fiber rings, and the Casparian strip of the vegetative organs of the studied species, confers stability, rigidity, and mechanical support to the cell walls and internal tissues [30,54]. The Casparian strip, along with suberin deposits (both hydrophobic substances), contribute to solute selectivity in the root endodermis and act as a barrier against apoplast movement, preventing the influx of ions from the vascular cylinder to the cortical region [67,68,69].
Starch grains, observed in spiranthosomes for the first time in leaves, were also found inside stomata guard cells of the studied species (Figure 5h). Starch grains in guard cells have been reported in other orchids [70] and other Angiosperms [71,72,73]. According to Appezzato-da-Glória and Carmello-Guerreiro [54], potassium levels in those structures appear to be associated with starch hydrolysis, which provides those organic anions. There is also evidence that malate, the regulator responsible for guard cell movements, can be synthesized through starch degradation [74,75].
According to Sut et al. [11] and Bulpitt et al. [76], many of the secondary metabolic substances identified in representatives of Orchidaceae (such as flavonoids, alkaloids, terpenes, glycosides) act in plant defenses against herbivores and pathogens and have bioactive pharmacological effects [77,78]. We believe that the presence of alkaloids in the stomata guard cells (first reported for orchid guard cells), and in the cortical parenchyma of rhizomes and roots, along with the identified raphides in B. guayanensis, suggests their defensive role against pathogens and herbivores, as mentioned by Franceschi and Nakata [65] and Vizzotto et al. [79] for plants in general. Similar to what has been postulated by Li et al. [80] for the vegetative organs of other orchids, the abundant presence of raphides and secondary metabolites (e.g., alkaloids) in B. guayanensis, especially in the reserve organs (e.g., the roots and rhizomes), are responsible for renewing their aerial portions and help prevent pathogens and herbivores from reaching the vascular system (which is usually found in more internal regions) and causing local and/or systemic damage.
Among the bioactive substances found in Orchidaceae species are alkaloids (e.g., dendrobin, nobilonin, dendroxin) and nitrogenous heterocyclic organic molecules derived from the secondary metabolism of amino acids (e.g., phenylalanine, lysine, arginine, tyrosine, tryptophan). More than 100 types of bioactive alkaloids have been identified in over 2000 orchid species [5,81]. These alkaloids have been found to be effective in treating gastrointestinal disorders and cardiovascular diseases and have shown anti-inflammatory, diuretic, analgesic, antioxidant, immunomodulatory, antipyretic, and antitumor activities [82,83,84]. The presence of alkaloids in B. guayanensis indicates its potential as a medicinal species. Further (bio)phytochemical investigations could be informative, including the subsequent isolation and toxicity testing of any bioactive substances and the characterization of their chemical nature.

3. Materials and Methods

For the anatomical studies, samples of vegetative organs (e.g., the mid-portions of the leaf blades, rhizomes, and roots) from five adult individuals of B. guayanensis (Figure 1) were collected in open fields near Bosque Auguste Saint-Hilaire, at Campus II (Samambaia) of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, GO, Brazil. Botanical material collections followed the recommendations of Mori et al. [85], and voucher specimens were deposited in the UFG herbarium (registration numbers: I.S. Santos 1160 and 1161).
The collected samples for anatomical studies were fixed in 70% FAA (glacial acetic acid, formaldehyde, and 70% ethyl alcohol, 1:1:18) in hermetically sealed containers for 48 h. After this period, they were preserved in 70% ethyl alcohol [86]. For the anatomical descriptions, cross-sections were cut using a razor blade and clarified in a 20% aqueous solution of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO) (v/v) [87]. They were then stained with astra blue and safranin (9:1) [88] and mounted in aqueous glycerol solution (1:1). To analyze the leaf surface in frontal view, the epidermis was dissociated using the Jeffrey method [86]. For the procedures mentioned above, the slides were sealed with a colorless sealant and subsequently photomicrographed using a Leica ICC50 HD® digital camera attached to a Leica DM500® microscope, using Motic 2.0 Image Plus Software.
For histochemical studies, in natura samples obtained at the time of collection were stained with the following reagents: Coomassie blue and xylidine ponceau [89,90] for detecting proteins; ferric chloride for detecting phenolic compounds; acidified phloroglucinol for lignin; Sudan IV for total lipids [86]; Dittmar for alkaloids [91]; Fehling for reducing sugars [87]; Lugol for starch [92]; and hydrochloric vanillin to detect tannins [93]. To verify the chemical constitution of the crystals, 10% hydrochloric acid was used, following Chamberlain [94]. The descriptions of the examined organs were based on the terminologies used in the specialized literature [16,20,21].

4. Conclusions

In this study, we have provided the first information regarding the anatomy and histochemistry of Brachystele. The studied species exhibit foliar, cauline, and root characters shared with other Cranichideae species (e.g., spiranthosomes, fiber rings, vascular bundles in the form of “^” or “v”, fleshy roots, among others). Others can be interpreted as adaptive strategies that have evolved in response to the environment and their terrestrial life form, including cuticle thickness, the presence of amphistomatic leaves, fibers, and lignin for internal tissues support, fleshy roots with reduced velamen compared to the cortex, the presence of trichomes to increase water and nutrients absorption, and raphides for calcium reserve, osmotic and ionic regulation, detoxification, and defense. In this study, the cataphylls are received in anatomical terms for Orchidaceae, in addition to verifying that the tiny starch grains are aggregated in spiranthosomes throughout the vegetative systems of B. guayanensis, and such structures, as well as the alkaloids, are first referred to leaves, especially for the stomatal guard cells. The presence of hyphae and pelotons in the stem of B. guayanensis are first described for Cranichideae. We believe that such fungal structures, located in the peripheral portions of the rhizomes, are important strategies for the maintenance of internal tissues and the efficient inoculation of still young adventitious roots. In addition, the presence and abundance of alkaloids and raphides in the reserve organs (roots and rhizomes), as well as in the guard cells of the stomata, may be associated with defense against herbivores and against the entry and systematization of pathogens and diseases, since its reserve organs are more durable than the aerial ones and are responsible for the maintenance and renewal of its aerial parts by storing water and other energy reserves (e.g., sugars and nutrients), and the stomata for configuring an entryway for harmful microorganisms. Additionally, B. guayanensis is likely to be a potentially medicinal species, mainly due to the abundance of alkaloids in its roots and rhizomes, similarly to phylogenetically related groups of the family. Furthermore, this study reveals the importance of anatomical and histochemical studies, in particular, directed to neotropical orchids that are poorly studied, guiding the development of studies with different aspects, especially biochemical and phytochemical studies.

Author Contributions

I.S.d.S. collected, processed, and identified the botanical material; M.J.d.S. supervised all laboratory work and the analysis of data obtained by I.S.d.S.; M.J.d.S. also guided the elaboration of the manuscript and provided a critical analysis of the data obtained; I.S.d.S. and M.J.d.S. participated in the interpretation of the data, writing, conceptualization, theoretical basis, review and editing of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to the Federal University of Goiás (UFG) and the São Paulo State University (Unesp) for providing the necessary facilities and logistical support. They also acknowledge the support from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the PhD and Productivity scholarships in Research awarded to the authors. Special thanks are extended to Roy Richard Funch for his detailed review of the manuscript. Lastly, the authors would like to thank the reviewers for their valuable input in improving the quality of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pridgeon, A.M.; Cribb, P.J.; Chase, M.W.; Rasmussen, F.N. Genera Orchidacearum—Orchidoideae (Part 1), 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001; Volume 2, pp. 1–416. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pridgeon, A.M.; Cribb, P.J.; Chase, M.W.; Rasmussen, F.N. Genera Orchidacearum—Orchidoideae—Vanilloideae (Part 2), 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2003; Volume 3, pp. 1–360. [Google Scholar]
  3. Flora e Funga do Brasil—Orchidaceae Juss. and Brachystele Schltr. Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. 2015. Available online: https://servicos.jbrj.gov.br/flora/#/CheckList (accessed on 10 June 2023).
  4. Dressler, R. Phylogeny and Classifications of the Orchid Family, 1st ed.; Dioscorides press: Portland, OR, USA, 1993; p. 314. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hossain, M.M. Therapeutic orchids: Traditional uses and recent advances—An overview. Fitoterapia 2011, 82, 102–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Teoh, E.S. Medicinal Orchids of Asia, 1st ed.; Springer International Publishing: Heidelberg/Berlin, Germany, 2016; pp. 1–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Teoh, E.S. Orchids as Aphrodisiac, Medicine or Food, 1st ed.; Springer International Publishing: Heidelberg/Berlin, Germany, 2019; pp. 1–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Stern, W.L. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons: X. Orchidaceae, 1st ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014; pp. 1–288. [Google Scholar]
  9. Tremblay, R.L. Trends in the pollination ecology of the Orchidaceae: Evolution and systematics. Can. J. Bot. 1992, 70, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kurzweil, H.; Linder, H.P.; Stern, W.L.; Pridgeon, A.M. Comparative vegetative anatomy and classification of Diseae (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1995, 117, 171–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sut, S.; Maggi, F.; Dall’Acqua, S. Bioactive secondary metabolites from orchids (Orchidaceae). Chem. Biodivers. 2017, 14, e1700172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cota, B.B.; Magalhães, A.; Pimenta, A.; Siqueira, E.P.; Alves, T.; Zani, C.L. Chemical constituents of Habenaria petalodes Lindl. (Orchidaceae). J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2008, 19, 1098–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Godinho, C.C. Estudos Metabolômicos de Espécies Brasileiras de Orchidaceae. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  14. Silva, I.V.; Meira, R.M.S.A.; Azevedo, A.A.; Euclydes, R.M.A. Estratégias anatômicas foliares de treze espécies de Orchidaceae ocorrentes em um campo de altitude no Parque Estadual da Serra do Brigadeiro (PESB)—MG, Brasil. Acta Bot. Bras. 2006, 20, 741–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bernal, A.A.; Smidt, E.C.; Bona, C. Spiral root hairs in Spiranthinae (Cranichideae: Orchidaceae). Rev. Bras. Bot. 2015, 38, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bona, C.; Engels, M.E.; Pieczak, F.S.; Smidt, E.C. Comparative vegetative anatomy of Neotropical Goodyerinae Klotzsch (Orchidaceae Juss.: Orchidoideae Lindl.). Acta Bot. Bras. 2020, 34, 530–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rutkowski, P.; Mytnik, J.; Szlachetko, D.L. New taxa and new combinations in Mesoamerican Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Spirantheae). Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2004, 41, 471–477. [Google Scholar]
  18. Verettoni, H.N. Contribución al Conocimiesão Bioativas de las Plantas Medicinales de la Región de Bahía Blanca, 1st ed.; Harris y Cia: Bahía Blanca, Argentina, 1985; pp. 1–374. [Google Scholar]
  19. Neumann, C. Orchideen als Arzneipflanzen: Ein Querschnitt durch ausgewählte medizinische und botanisch-pharmazeutische Literatur des 19. Jahrhunderts. Z. Phytother. 2009, 30, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Andreota, R.C.; Barros, F.; Sajo, M.G. Root and leaf anatomy of some terrestrial representatives of the Cranichideae tribe (Orchidaceae). Rev. Bras. Bot. 2015, 38, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Corredor, B.A.D.; Arias, R.L. Morfoanatomía en Cranichideae (Orchidaceae) de la Estación Loma Redonda del Parque Nacional “Sierra Nevada”, Mérida, Venezuela. Lankesteriana 2012, 12, 61–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Aybeke, M. Comparative anatomy of selected rhizomatous and tuberous taxa of subfamilies Orchidoideae and Epidendroideae (Orchidaceae) as an aid to identification. Plant Syst. Evol. 2012, 298, 1643–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Şenel, G.; Akbulut, M.K.; Şeker, Ş.S. Comparative anatomical properties of some Epidendroideae and Orchidoideae species distributed in NE Turkey. Protoplasma 2019, 256, 655–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Stern, W.L.; Morris, M.W.; Judd, W.S.; Pridgeon, A.M.; Dressler, R.L. Comparative vegetative anatomy and systematics of Spiranthoideae (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1993, 113, 161–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stern, W.L. Vegetative anatomy of subtribe Orchidinae (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1997, 124, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Stern, W.L. Vegetative anatomy of subtribe Habenariinae (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1997, 125, 211–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aybeke, M.; Sezik, E.; Olgun, G. Vegetative anatomy of some Ophrys, Orchis and Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae) taxa in Trakya region of Turkey. Flora 2010, 205, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Oliveira, V.C.; Sajo, M.G. Leaf anatomy of epiphyte species of Orchidaceae. Rev. Bras. Bot. 1999, 22, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silva, C.I.; Milaneze-Gutierre, M.A. Caracterização morfoanatômica dos órgãos vegetativos de Cattleya walkeriana Gardner (Orchidaceae). Acta Sci. 2004, 26, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fahn, A. Plant Anatomy, 4th ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1990; pp. 1–530. [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith, W.K.; Vogelmann, T.C.; DeLucia, E.H.; Bell, D.T.; Shepherd, K.A. Leaf form and photosynthesis. Bioscience 1997, 47, 785–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Stern, W.L.; Aldrich, H.C.; McDowell, L.M.; Morris, M.W.; Pridgeon, A.M. Amyloplasts from cortical root cells of Spiranthoideae (Orchidaceae). Protoplasma 1993, 172, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sachs, J. Lectures on the Physiology of Plants, 1st ed.; Clarendon Press: London, UK, 1887; pp. 1–836. [Google Scholar]
  34. Haberlandt, G. Physiological Plant Anatomy, 4th ed.; Macmillan and Co., Ltd.: London, UK, 1928; pp. 381–382. [Google Scholar]
  35. Şeker, Ş.S. What does the quantitative morphological diversity of starch grains in terrestrial orchids indicate? Microsc. Res. Tech. 2022, 85, 2931–2942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Stern, W.L.; Judd, W.S. Comparative vegetative anatomy and systematics of Vanilla (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1999, 131, 353–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Stern, W.L.; Judd, W.S. Comparative anatomy and systematics of the orchid tribe Vanilleae excluding Vanilla. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2000, 134, 179–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Carlsward, B.S.; Stern, W.L. Vegetative anatomy and systematics of Triphorinae (Orchidaceae). Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 159, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Menezes, N.L.; Elbl, P.M.; Cury, G.; Appezzato-da-Glória, B.; Sasaki, K.L.; Silva, C.G.; Costa, G.R.; Lima, V.G. The meristematic activity of the endodermis and the pericycle and its role in the primary thickening of stems in monocotyledonous plants. Plant Ecol. Divers. 2012, 5, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pereira, O.L.; Kasuya, M.C.M.; Rollemberg, C.L.; Chaer, G.M. Isolamento e identificação de fungos micorrízicos rizoctonióides associados a três espécies de orquídeas epífitas neotropicais no Brasil. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo 2005, 29, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pridgeon, A.M. Multicellular trichomes in tribe Diurideae (Orchidaceae): Systematic and biological significance. Kew Bull. 1994, 49, 569–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Bougoure, J.; Ludwig, M.; Brundrett, M.; Grierson, P. Identity and specificity of the fungi forming mycorrhizas with the rare mycoheterotrophic orchid Rhizanthella gardneri. Mycol. Res. 2009, 113, 1097–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Uma, E.; Rajendran, R.; Muthukumar, T. Morphology, anatomy and mycotrophy of pseudobulb and subterranean organs in Eulophia epidendraea and Malaxis acuminata (Epidendroideae, Orchidaceae). Flora 2015, 217, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Suetsugu, K.; Haraguchi, T.F.; Tanabe, A.S.; Tayasu, I. Specialized mycorrhizal association between a partially mycoheterotrophic orchid Oreorchis indica and a Tomentella taxon. Mycorrhiza 2021, 31, 243–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Pedroso-de-Moraes, C.; Souza-Leal, T.; Barros, F.; Sajo, M.G. Vegetative anatomy of some Brazilian Zygopetalinae (Orchidaceae). Iheringia 2018, 73, 159–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Smith, S.E.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis, 3rd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 1–787. [Google Scholar]
  47. Smith, S.E.; Jakobsen, I.; Grønlund, M.; Smith, F.A. Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: Interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156, 1050–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Seleiman, M.F.; Hardan, A.N. Importance of mycorrhizae in crop productivity. In Mitigating Environmental Stresses for Agricultural Sustainability in Egypt, 1st ed.; Awaad, H., Abu-hashim, M., Negm, A., Eds.; Springer Water: Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 1, pp. 471–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Li, X.L.; Marschner, H.; George, E. Acquisition of phosphorus and copper by VA-mycorrhizal hyphae and root-to-shoot transport in white clover. Plant Soil 1991, 136, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Azaizeh, H.A.; Marschner, H.; Römheld, V.; Wittenmayer, L. Effects of a vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and other soil microorganisms on growth, mineral nutrient acquisition and root exudation of soil grown maize plants. Mycorrhiza 1995, 5, 321–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Taiz, L.; Zeiger, E. Fisiologia Vegetal, 3rd ed.; Artmed: Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 2006; pp. 1–719. [Google Scholar]
  52. Bedini, S.; Pellegrino, E.; Avio, L.; Pellegrini, S.; Bazzoffi, P.; Argese, E.; Giovannetti, M. Changes in soil aggregation and glomalinrelated soil protein content as affected by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species Glomus mosseae and Glomus intraradices. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2009, 41, 1491–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Metcalfe, C.R. Comparative anatomy as a modern Botanical discipline. In Advances in Botanical Research, 1st ed.; Metcalfe, C.R., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1963; Volume 6, pp. 101–147. [Google Scholar]
  54. Appezzato-da-Glória, B.; Carmello-Guerreiro, S.M. Anatomia Vegetal, 2nd ed.; Editora UFV: Viçosa, BA, Brazil, 2006; pp. 1–438. [Google Scholar]
  55. Andreota, R.C. Anatomia dos Órgãos Vegetativos de Representantes da Tribo Cranichideae (Orchidoideae: Orchidaceae). Masters’ Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  56. Figueroa, C.; Salazar, G.A.; Zavaleta, H.A.; Engleman, E.M. Root character evolution and systematics in Cranichidinae, Prescottiinae and Spiranthinae (Orchidaceae, Cranichideae). Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Porembski, S.; Barthlott, W. Velamen radicum micromorphology and classification of Orchidaceae. Nord. J. Bot. 1988, 8, 117–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Moreira, A.S.F.P.; Isaias, R.M.S. Comparative anatomy of the absorption roots of terrestrial and epiphytic orchids. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2008, 51, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Pridgeon, A.M. The velamen and exodermis of orchid roots. In Orchid Biology, Reviews and Perspectives, 1st ed.; Arditti, J., Ed.; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 1987; Volume 4, pp. 139–192. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chomicki, G.; Bidel, L.P.R.; Ming, F.; Coiro, M.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Baissac, Y.; Jay-Allemand, C.; Renner, S.S. The velamen protects photosynthetic orchid roots against UV-B damage, and a large dated phylogeny implies multiple gains and losses of this function during the Cenozoic. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1330–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Cameron, D.D.; Johnson, I.; Leake, J.R.; Read, D.J. Mycorrhizal acquisition of inorganic phosphorus by the green-leaved terrestrial orchid Goodyera repens. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 831–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Juniper, B.E.; Jeffree, C.E. Plant Surfaces, 1st ed.; Edward Arnold Publishers: London, UK, 1983; pp. 1–93. [Google Scholar]
  63. Dickison, W.C. Integrative Plant Anatomy, 1st ed.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 1–533. [Google Scholar]
  64. Evert, R.F. Esau’s Plant Anatomy: Meristems, Cells and Tissues of the Plant Body: Their Structure, Function and Development, 3rd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 1–601. [Google Scholar]
  65. Franceschi, V.R.; Nakata, P.A. Calcium oxalate in plants: Formation and function. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 41–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Haridasan, M. Alumínio é um elemento tóxico para as plantas nativas do cerrado? In Fisiologia Vegetal: Práticas em Relações Hídricas, Fotossíntese e Nutrição Mineral, 1st ed.; Prado, C.H.B.A., Casali, C.A., Eds.; Editora Manole: Barueri, SP, Brazil, 2006; Volume 1, pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  67. Peterson, C.A.; Murrmann, M.; Steudle, E. Location of the major barriers to water and ion movement in young roots of Zea mays L. Planta 1993, 190, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Enstone, D.E.; Peterson, C.A.; Ma, F. Root endodermis and exodermis: Structure, function, and responses to the environment. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2003, 21, 335–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Lux, A.; Luxová, M. Growth and differentiation of root endodermis in Primula acaulis Jacq. Biol. Plant. 2003, 47, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. D’Amelio, E.D.; Zeiger, E. Diversity of guard cell plastids of the Orchidaceae: A structural and functional study. Canad. J. Bot. 1988, 66, 257–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Nunes, E.; Scopel, M.; Vignoli-Silva, M.; Vendruscolo, G.S.; Henriques, A.T.; Mentz, L.A. Caracterização farmacobotânica das espécies de Sambucus (Caprifoliaceae) utilizadas como medicinais no Brasil. Parte II. Sambucus australis Cham. Schltdl. Braz. J. Pharmacog. 2007, 17, 414–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Kikuchi, T.Y.S.; Braga, Z.V.; Potiguara, R.C.V. Anatomia foliar de Socratea exorrhiza (Mart.) H. Wendl. (Arecaceae). Biota Amazôn. 2016, 6, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Reis, R.E.; Alvim, M.N. Anatomia foliar comparada de três espécies do gênero Oxalis L. (Oxalidaceae). NBC 2013, 3, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Vavasseur, A.; Raghavendra, A.S. Guard cell metabolism and CO2 sensing. New Phytol. 2005, 165, 665–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Araújo, W.L.; Nunes-Nesi, A.; Osorio, S.; Usadel, B.; Fuentes, D.; Nagy, R.; Balbo, I.; Lehmann, M.; Studart-Witkowski, C.; Tohge, T.; et al. Antisense inhibition of the iron-sulphur subunit of succinate dehydrogenase enhances photosynthesis and growth in tomato via an organic acid mediated effect on stomatal aperture. Plant Cell. 2011, 23, 600–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Bulpitt, C.J.; Li, Y.; Bulpitt, P.F.; Wang, J. The use of orchids in Chinese medicine. J. R. Soc. Med. 2007, 100, 558–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Hartmann, T. Chemical ecology of pyrrolizidine alkaloids. Planta 1999, 207, 483–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sepúlveda-Jiménez, G.; Porta-Ducoing, H.; Rocha-Sosa, M. La participación de los metabolitos secundarios en la defensa de las plantas. Rev. Mex. Fitopatol. 2003, 21, 355–363. [Google Scholar]
  79. Vizzotto, M.; Krolow, A.C.R.; Weber, G.E.B. Metabólitos Secundários Encontrados em Plantas e sua Importância, 1st ed.; Embrapa Clima Temperado: Pelotas, RS, Brazil, 2010; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  80. Li, J.W.; Zhang, Z.B.; Zhang, S.B. Widely targeted metabolic, physical and anatomical analyses reveal diverse defensive strategies for pseudobulbs and succulent roots of orchids with industrial value. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 177, 114510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gutierrez, R.M.P. Orchids: A review of uses in traditional medicine, its phytochemistry and pharmacology. J. Med. Plant Res. 2010, 4, 592–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Brito, H.O.; Noronha, E.P.; França, L.M. Phytochemical analysis composition from Annona squamosa (ATA) ethanolic extract leaves. Rev. Bras. Farm. 2008, 89, 180–184. [Google Scholar]
  83. Ng, T.B.; Liu, J.; Wong, J.H.; Ye, X.; Sze, S.C.W.; Tong, Y.; Zhang, K.Y. Review of research on Dendrobium, a prized folk medicine. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 93, 1795–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, R.; Liu, T.; Liu, M.; Chen, F.; Liu, S.; Yang, J. Anti-influenza a virus activity of dendrobine and its mechanism of action. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 3665–3674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Mori, S.A.; Silva, L.A.; Lisboa, G.; Coradin, L. Manual de Manejo do Herbário Fanerogâmico, 2nd ed.; CEPLAC: Ilhéus, BA, Brazil, 1989; pp. 1–104. [Google Scholar]
  86. Johansen, D.A. Plant Microtechnique, 1st ed.; McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1940; pp. 1–523. [Google Scholar]
  87. Kraus, J.E.; Arduin, M. Manual Básico de Métodos em Morfologia Vegetal, 1st ed.; EDUR: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1997; pp. 1–198. [Google Scholar]
  88. Bukatsch, F. Bermerkungen zur Doppelfrbung Astrablau-Safranin. Mikrokosmos 1972, 61, 255. [Google Scholar]
  89. Fisher, D.B. Protein staining of ribboned epon sections for light microscopy. Histochemie 1968, 16, 92–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. O’Brien, T.P.; McCully, M.E. The Study of Plant Structure Principles and Selected Methods, 1st ed.; Termarcarphi: Melbourne, Australia, 1981; pp. 1–344. [Google Scholar]
  91. Furr, M.; Mahlberg, P.G. Histochemical analyses of laticifers and glandular trichomes in Cannabis sativa. J. Nat. Prod. 1981, 44, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Jensen, W.A. Botanical Histochemistry: Principles and Practice, 1st ed.; W.H. Freeman: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1962; pp. 1–408. [Google Scholar]
  93. Mace, M.E.; Howell, C.R. Histological and identification of condensed tannin precursor in roots of cotton seedlings. Can. J. Bot. 1974, 52, 2423–2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Chamberlain, C.J. Methods in Plant Histology, 5th ed.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, CA, USA, 1932; pp. 1–416. [Google Scholar]
Plants 12 02635 g001 550
Figure 1. Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr. (a) habit; (b,c) details of leaf, short rhizome, tuberous roots, and base of the inflorescence axis; (d) detail of the inflorescence; (e) flower frontal view; (f) flower lateral view; (g) capsules. Photographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Figure 1. Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr. (a) habit; (b,c) details of leaf, short rhizome, tuberous roots, and base of the inflorescence axis; (d) detail of the inflorescence; (e) flower frontal view; (f) flower lateral view; (g) capsules. Photographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Plants 12 02635 g001
Plants 12 02635 g002 550
Figure 2. Leaf anatomy of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr.; (a,b) epidermis in frontal view; (c–j) cross-sections; (a,c) detail of the adaxial surface; (b,d) detail of the abaxial surface; (e) leaf blade; (f) detail of raphides under polarized light; (g) midrib; (h) detail of the vascular bundle of the midrib; (i) detail of the smaller-caliber vascular bundle; (j) margin. ep = epidermis; me = mesophyll; ph = phloem; vb = vascular bundle; xy = xylem; * = substomatic chamber; arrows = stomata. Scales: (a–d,f,h–j) = 50 µm; (e,g) = 200 µm. Photomicrographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Figure 2. Leaf anatomy of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr.; (a,b) epidermis in frontal view; (c–j) cross-sections; (a,c) detail of the adaxial surface; (b,d) detail of the abaxial surface; (e) leaf blade; (f) detail of raphides under polarized light; (g) midrib; (h) detail of the vascular bundle of the midrib; (i) detail of the smaller-caliber vascular bundle; (j) margin. ep = epidermis; me = mesophyll; ph = phloem; vb = vascular bundle; xy = xylem; * = substomatic chamber; arrows = stomata. Scales: (a–d,f,h–j) = 50 µm; (e,g) = 200 µm. Photomicrographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Plants 12 02635 g002
Plants 12 02635 g003 550
Figure 3. Rhizome anatomy of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr.; (a,b) general aspect; (c) detail of the buds with leaf primordia and cataphylls; (d) detail of the epidermis and portion of the cortical parenchyma; (e) raphides; (f) starch grains gathered in spiranthosomes; (g) detail of hyphae and pelotons; (h) detail of fiber ring; (i) detail of the central portion of the rhizomes and arrangement of the vascular bundles; (j) detail of the vascular bundle. ar = adventitious root; bu = buds; ca = cataphylls; ct = cortex; ep = epidermis; fi = fibers; vb = vascular bundles; hi = hyphae; pa = parenchyma; pe = pelotons; ph = phloem; st = starch grains gathered in spiranthosomes; xy = xylem; * = substomatic chamber; arrows = stomata. Scales: (a,b) = 1000 µm; (c) = 500 µm; (i) = 200 µm; (d,f–h,j) = 50 µm; (e) = 20 µm. Photomicrographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Figure 3. Rhizome anatomy of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr.; (a,b) general aspect; (c) detail of the buds with leaf primordia and cataphylls; (d) detail of the epidermis and portion of the cortical parenchyma; (e) raphides; (f) starch grains gathered in spiranthosomes; (g) detail of hyphae and pelotons; (h) detail of fiber ring; (i) detail of the central portion of the rhizomes and arrangement of the vascular bundles; (j) detail of the vascular bundle. ar = adventitious root; bu = buds; ca = cataphylls; ct = cortex; ep = epidermis; fi = fibers; vb = vascular bundles; hi = hyphae; pa = parenchyma; pe = pelotons; ph = phloem; st = starch grains gathered in spiranthosomes; xy = xylem; * = substomatic chamber; arrows = stomata. Scales: (a,b) = 1000 µm; (c) = 500 µm; (i) = 200 µm; (d,f–h,j) = 50 µm; (e) = 20 µm. Photomicrographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Plants 12 02635 g003
Plants 12 02635 g004 550
Figure 4. Root anatomy of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr.; (a–k) cross-sections; (a) general aspect; (b,c) detail of the velamen, exodermis and trichomes; (d) detail of the cortex. Note the presence of hyphae and pelotons in more peripheral portions; (e) raphides under polarized light; (f) starch grains gathered in spiranthosomes; (g,h) detail of hyphae and pelotons in the cortical parenchyma; (i,j) vascular cylinder; (k) detail of the endodermis, pericycle, xylem and phloem. ct = cortex; en = endodermis; ex = exodermis; hi = hyphae; pe = pelotons; ph = phloem; st = starch grains gathered in spiranthosomes; tr = trichome; ve = velamen; xy = xylem; * = pericycle; white arrows = Casparian strips. Scales: (a) = 1000 µm; (b,c,e,g,h,k) = 50 µm; (f) = 20 µm; (d,i,j) = 200 µm. Photomicrographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Figure 4. Root anatomy of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr.; (a–k) cross-sections; (a) general aspect; (b,c) detail of the velamen, exodermis and trichomes; (d) detail of the cortex. Note the presence of hyphae and pelotons in more peripheral portions; (e) raphides under polarized light; (f) starch grains gathered in spiranthosomes; (g,h) detail of hyphae and pelotons in the cortical parenchyma; (i,j) vascular cylinder; (k) detail of the endodermis, pericycle, xylem and phloem. ct = cortex; en = endodermis; ex = exodermis; hi = hyphae; pe = pelotons; ph = phloem; st = starch grains gathered in spiranthosomes; tr = trichome; ve = velamen; xy = xylem; * = pericycle; white arrows = Casparian strips. Scales: (a) = 1000 µm; (b,c,e,g,h,k) = 50 µm; (f) = 20 µm; (d,i,j) = 200 µm. Photomicrographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Plants 12 02635 g004
Plants 12 02635 g005 550
Figure 5. Histochemical tests in the vegetative organs of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr.; (a–g,i–n,p–u) cross-sections; (h,o) epidermis in frontal view; (a,b,g,m,n,s–u) root; (c,d,h–j,o,p) leaf; (e,f,k,l,q,r) rhizome; (a,b) protein nature of fungal hyphae and pelotons; (c) detail of the cuticle (total lipids) under polarized light; (d–g) lignin (polarized light in (e)); (h–n) starch grains. Note the spiranthosomes in (n); (o–u) total alkaloids. c = cuticle; ct = cortex; en = endodermis; ep = epidermis; fi = fibers; hi = hyphae; me = mesophyll; pe = pelotons; ph = phloem; vb = vascular bundle; xy = xylem; * = fiber rings; black arrows = Casparian strips; white arrows = starch grains and alkaloids. Scales: (a,b,d–h,j,l,o,q–t) = 50 µm; (c,n,u) = 20 µm; (i,m,p) = 200 µm; (k) = 500 µm. Photomicrographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Figure 5. Histochemical tests in the vegetative organs of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr.; (a–g,i–n,p–u) cross-sections; (h,o) epidermis in frontal view; (a,b,g,m,n,s–u) root; (c,d,h–j,o,p) leaf; (e,f,k,l,q,r) rhizome; (a,b) protein nature of fungal hyphae and pelotons; (c) detail of the cuticle (total lipids) under polarized light; (d–g) lignin (polarized light in (e)); (h–n) starch grains. Note the spiranthosomes in (n); (o–u) total alkaloids. c = cuticle; ct = cortex; en = endodermis; ep = epidermis; fi = fibers; hi = hyphae; me = mesophyll; pe = pelotons; ph = phloem; vb = vascular bundle; xy = xylem; * = fiber rings; black arrows = Casparian strips; white arrows = starch grains and alkaloids. Scales: (a,b,d–h,j,l,o,q–t) = 50 µm; (c,n,u) = 20 µm; (i,m,p) = 200 µm; (k) = 500 µm. Photomicrographs by Igor Soares dos Santos.
Plants 12 02635 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Santos, I.S.d.; Silva, M.J.d. Anatomy and Histochemistry of the Vegetative System of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr. (Orchidaceae), a Potential Medicinal Species. Plants 2023, 12, 2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142635

AMA Style

Santos ISd, Silva MJd. Anatomy and Histochemistry of the Vegetative System of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr. (Orchidaceae), a Potential Medicinal Species. Plants. 2023; 12(14):2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142635

Chicago/Turabian Style

Santos, Igor Soares dos, and Marcos José da Silva. 2023. "Anatomy and Histochemistry of the Vegetative System of Brachystele guayanensis (Lindl.) Schltr. (Orchidaceae), a Potential Medicinal Species" Plants 12, no. 14: 2635. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12142635

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop