Next Article in Journal
Synergistic Effect of Supercritical and Ultrasound-Assisted Ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) Extracts
Previous Article in Journal
Photosynthetic, Molecular and Ultrastructural Characterization of Toxic Effects of Zinc in Caulerpa racemosa Indicate Promising Bioremediation Potentiality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Rapid Identification of Paeoniae Radix and Moutan Radicis Cortex Using a SCAR Marker-Based Conventional PCR Assay

Herbal Medicine Resources Research Center, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, Naju 58245, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2022, 11(21), 2870; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212870
Submission received: 24 August 2022 / Revised: 17 October 2022 / Accepted: 25 October 2022 / Published: 27 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Plant Genetics, Genomics and Biotechnology)

Abstract

:
Paeoniae Radix is a herbal medicine prepared from the dried roots of Paeonia lactiflora, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and P. japonica. Although the herbal medicines prepared from these species are morphologically similar, they have different pharmacological effects depending on how they are processed. In addition, P. japonica is more expensive than other Paeonia spp. in the Korean herbal market. Although there is a clear difference between the Korean and Chinese pharmacopeias of Paeoniae Radix, the processed roots of P. lactiflora and P. anomala subsp. veitchii are commonly used indiscriminately in the herbal market. Moreover, Paeonia suffruticosa, an allied genus of P. lactiflora, is prescribed as Moutan Radicis Cortex. Therefore, accurate taxonomic identification of plant species is vital for quality assurance. A genetic assay is a reliable tool for accurately discriminating species in processed herbal medicines. To develop a genetic assay for the identification of four Paeonia species (P. lactiflora, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, P. japonica, and P. suffruticosa), we analyzed the sequences of two DNA barcoding regions, internal transcribed spacer and rbcL. A conventional PCR assay was established in this study for simple and rapid species identification using sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers based on arbitrary nucleotide-containing primers. This assay was verified to be species specific and highly sensitive and could be applied to Paeonia species identification at an affordable rate.

1. Introduction

Paeoniae Radix (PR) is a herbal medicine commonly used in Asian countries, especially China and Korea, for curing extravasated blood, relieving pain, alleviating fever, and inducing hepatoprotection [1,2]. Paeonia lactiflora Pall. and its closely related species are authentic sources of PR, according to the Korean Pharmacopoeia [1]. However, three Paeonia species (P. lactiflora, P. japonica (Makino) Miyabe & Takeda, and Paeonia anomala subsp. veitchii (Lynch) D.Y.Hong & K.Y.Pan) are frequently distributed as PR in the Korean herbal market (Figure S1) [3,4]. In China, an important exporting country of PR to Korea, two herbal medicines are prepared from the roots of P. lactiflora, depending on the method of processing: Paeoniae Radix Rubra (PRR) and Paeoniae Radix Alba (PRA) [1,3]. Thus, PRR is defined as the dried root of two species (P. lactiflora and P. anomala subsp. veitchii) according to the Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China and is usually prescribed for the same pharmacological purpose as Korean PR [1,5]. On the other hand, PRA is defined as only the peeled root of P. lactiflora and is usually prescribed for its anti-inflammatory and immune regulatory effects in Chinese Medicine [1,5]. Additionally, the root bark of Paeonia suffruticosa is used as the source of Moutan Radicis Cortex (MRC), a herbal medicine used to activate blood, but is not used as a source of PR [1,6].
Most herbal medicines containing one or more species are considered authentic [1,7]. Moreover, some herbal medicines containing species belonging to different genera are used as substitutes for each other, because they have equivalent pharmacological effects [1,7]. Medicinal plants present many possibilities for the development of new drugs and dietary supplements as they are inherently abundant in natural health-promoting compounds [8,9]. The pharmacological and chemical characteristics of Paeonia species are also studied at the species level [7,10,11].
Herbal medicines are frequently contaminated by adulterants due to such reasons as economic motivation, morphological similarity, and synonymous names [12,13]. In Korea, PR herbal medicine and P. lactiflora are called Jak-yak, which is a synonym. Because of its scarcity, P. japonica is more expensive than the other Paeonia spp. (P. lactiflora and P. anomala subsp. veitchii) in the Korean herbal market [4]. The peeled root of P. lactiflora is sold as P. japonica in the Korean herbal market because of the morphological similarity between the two species and the economic motivation of the seller. Therefore, accurate species identification is vital for the quality control of raw materials. To prevent the contamination of herbal medicines, the development of a diagnostic assay is required.
Species identification uses multidisciplinary approaches such as morphological evaluation, chemical analysis, and genetic assay [1,3,4]. Among these approaches, a genetic assay is cheap and guarantees accurate results without requiring highly skilled personnel and expensive analytic instruments [13]. Recently, genomic regions such as internal transcribed spacer (ITS), matK, rbcL, and psbA-trnH have been used as DNA barcodes for the species-level identification of herbal medicines [14,15]. However, DNA barcoding analysis is not effective in all taxa because of no PCR amplification or low amplification efficiency, which makes it difficult to analyze the sequence [15]. Moreover, most herbal medicines are distributed in a sliced and/or dried state, which makes it difficult to trace some DNA barcoding regions, such as the 1.3 kb matK and 1.6 kb rbcL [16].
A genetic assay involving conventional PCR, DNA barcoding, and sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker-based genotyping is highly advantageous, since it can omit cumbersome processes such as gel extraction and sequence analysis [7]. Therefore, compared with DNA barcoding analysis, the conventional PCR assay is cheap and offers rapid results in 1 day [13].
In this study, we sequenced the ITS and rbcL regions of P. lactiflora, P. japonica, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and P. suffruticosa, and compared their sequences to determine interspecific variation. The discriminability and sensitivity of SCAR primers were validated using conventional PCR. Moreover, the SCAR markers developed in this study could accurately identify commercial PR and MRC herbal medicines.

2. Results

2.1. DNA Barcoding Analysis

Two DNA barcoding regions, ITS and rbcL, were analyzed in 35 plant samples (Table S1). Among the 35 samples used in this study, 17 have been sequenced previously [4]. Raw sequences of the remaining 18 samples newly reported in this study were obtained from the T7 and SP6 promoters located in the T-vector and processed by BioEdit to eliminate unnecessary sequences. Then, sequences of the analyzed region were registered in the GenBank database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (see Table S1 for accession numbers). The amplicon length of the ITS region was 743 nt in all four Paeonia species (Figure S2), while that of rbcL was 1511 nt in three species (P. lactiflora, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and P. suffruticosa) and 1530 nt in P. japonica (Figure S3).

2.2. SCAR Primer Design and PCR Assay Verification

Species-specific SCAR primers for the conventional PCR assay were designed in the sequence showing interspecific variability and intraspecific conservation (Table 1). SCAR primers were designed in the ITS region for three species (P. japonica, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and P. suffruticosa) and in the rbcL region for P. lactiflora. An arbitrary nucleotide was used at the 3′ end of the forward and reverse primers for enhancing sequence specificity, namely, PL-F (T → C), PJ-F (G → T), PJ-R (C → G), PA-R (C → G), and PS-F (G → C), where the abbreviations PL, PJ, PA, and PS represent the four species (P. lactiflora, P. japonica, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and P. suffruticosa, respectively), and F and R indicate forward and reverse primers, respectively. The melting temperature of the SCAR primer was designed to be approximately 55 °C.
To develop the conventional PCR assay, we tested the species specificity of candidate SCAR primers in 16 different combinations for P. lactiflora, 59 combinations for P. japonica, 8 for P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and 8 for P. suffruticosa (data not shown). Then, gradient PCRs at temperatures ranging from 55 °C to 65 °C were performed using the selected primer combinations (data not shown). Consequently, the annealing temperature of species-specific SCAR primers was determined to be 63 °C for all four species. Figure 1 shows the results of PCR amplification performed under optimal conditions using the finally selected SCAR primers. A 430 bp fragment was amplified from all ten accessions of P. lactiflora with the PL-F and PL-R primer combination, but no amplification was detected in nontarget species. Similarly, other SCAR primer combinations (PJ-F/-R for P. japonica, PA-F/-R for P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and PS-F/-R for P. suffruticosa) also showed species specificity (Figure 1).
The selected SCAR primer combinations were also tested against 21 other plant species used to prepare herbal medicines, including Panax ginseng, Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Cnidium officinale, Angelica gigas, Schisandra chinensis, Zanthoxylum schinifolium, Aralia continentalis, Cynanchum wilfordii, Angelica dahurica, Akebia quinata, Viscum coloratum, Adenophora stricta, Sigesbeckia orientalis subsp. pubescens, Rheum rhabarbarum, Machilus thunbergii, Scutellaria baicalensis, Clematis terniflora var. mandshurica, Prunus armeniaca var. ansu, Trichosanthes kirilowii, Ulmus macrocarpa, and Prunella vulgaris subsp. asiatica (Table 2). The results confirmed the species specificity of the SCAR primers (Figure S4 and Table 2).

2.3. Sensitivity and Discriminability of SCAR Primers

The sensitivity of the selected SCAR primer combinations was evaluated by measuring the limit of detection (LOD) using serial dilutions of the DNA template. The LOD value of the SCAR primer pairs for P. lactiflora, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and P. suffruticosa (PL-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R, respectively) was 10 pg, and that of the primer pair for P. japonica (PJ-F/-R) was 100 pg (Figure 2). In addition, the selected SCAR primer pairs could accurately identify the constituents of a mixed DNA sample (Figure 3).

2.4. Monitoring of Commercial PR and MRC Samples

We determined the composition of a total of 21 commercial products (16 PR and 5 MRC) using morphological and genetic assays (Table 3 and Figure 4). Among the 16 products commercially labeled as PR, 10 were identified as P. lactiflora, four as P. japonica, and two as P. anomala subsp. veitchii based on morphological analysis (Figure S5), while 12 were identified as P. lactiflora, 3 as P. japonica, and 1 as P. anomala subsp. veitchii based on the SCAR marker assay. On the other hand, all five commercial MRC samples were identified as P. suffructicosa in both the morphological and SCAR marker assays (Figure 4). Additionally, the results of DNA barcoding analysis using the ITS region were consistent with those of the SCAR marker assay (Table 3 and Figure S6).

3. Discussion

Herbal medicines can be easily mislabeled for economic gain economic because authentic species and adulterants are morphologically similar and have similar names [12,13]. In traditional Korean medicine, P. lactiflora is considered an authentic herbal medicine (PR) species, together with P. japonica and P. anomala subsp. veitchii [1,3,4]. However, because of economic motivation, P. lactiflora is sometimes traded as P. japonica, which is more expensive than the other Paeonia species in the Korean herbal market [4]. PRA, the peeled root of P. lactiflora, is called Baek-jak in Korean, which is synonymous with Baek-jak-yak, a herbal medicine derived from P. japonica [4]. Therefore, PRA could possibly be mislabeled as P. japonica [4]. Moreover, the herbal medicines PR and MRC are distributed in processed forms such as slices and dried roots, which makes it difficult to identify the plant species based on morphological evaluation [4]. Therefore, highly trained professionals, such as herbologists and taxonomists, are needed for the accurate morphological identification of species [3]. In recent studies, artificial intelligence using the deep-learning model has been employed for the morphological discrimination among species; however, this platform is not yet complete and therefore not reliable [17].
Recently, pharmacological analyses have been conducted to identify the effective components of Paeonia species [7,10,11]. Shi et al. reported that P. lactiflora and P. anomala subsp. veitchii contain more monoterpenoids than other Paeonia species [5]. Monoterpenoids, the main bioactive compounds unique to Paeonia species, possess anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticoagulative, antiallergic, sedative, and analgesic properties [18,19]. Ko et al. reported that P. japonica contains many bioactive compounds such as albiflorin, paeoniflorigenone, oxybenzoyl-paeoniflorin, paeonol, and paeoniflorin [10]. Therefore, we may discover new natural compounds with excellent pharmacological properties among these bioactive constituents.
The importance of diagnostic assay development was realized in Korea in 2015 during a confusing market situation called the Baek-suo situation. Cynanchum wilfordii, an authentic component of Cynanchi Wilfordii Radix, was used to synthesize dietary supplements and herbal medicines; however, C. wilfordii was replaced by Cynanchum auriculatum, a toxic adulterant, in these products [20,21]. However, the confusion soon came to an end when previously developed diagnostic PCR assays of C. wilfordii and C. auriculatum were used to test the adulterated products. Therefore, developing diagnostic assays preemptively can help avoid market confusion.
Genetic studies have been conducted on the PR herbal medicine and Paeonia species, and DNA barcoding and peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe assays have been reported [4]. Conventional PCR assay using species-specific primers is faster, cheaper, and more accurate than DNA barcoding analysis [7,22]. Kim et al. reported the development of a peptide nucleic acid (PNA) probe-based real-time PCR assay capable of rapidly and accurately discriminating among four Paeonia species, since the PNA probe could detect single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [4]. However, this assay requires expensive real-time PCR instruments with multichannel specifications, as well as a specially designed probe [4]. Moreover, this assay could discriminate only among three species, not among all four Paeonia species [4].
Therefore, we designed SCAR primers based on the sequences of the two most frequently used DNA barcodes (ITS and rbcL) and developed a simple and low-cost genetic assay that could be performed on a conventional PCR machine. Firstly, we analyzed the DNA barcoding regions to confirm that the ITS and rbcL regions could be discriminated. The species-specific SCAR primers were established by performing a singleplex assay on a conventional PCR machine. An arbitrary nucleotide was included at the 3′ terminal end of the primer and was confirmed to enhance the specificity of PCR amplification [22,23]. Moreover, we considered a small amplicon size tractable for the SCAR assay because this assay is applied to physically degraded and modified herbal medicines with poor amplification efficiency. The species-specific SCAR primers were developed in the ITS region for all species, except P. lactiflora; the ITS region of P. lactiflora could not be used for designing SCAR primers because it did not contain species-specific nucleotide variation. Instead, the rbcL region of P. lactiflora was used for SCAR primer design, and a singleplex assay was successfully established. The specificity of these SCAR primers was validated against 21 commercial herbal medicines (16 PR and 5 MRC), which are the most frequently prescribed in traditional Korean medicine. Moreover, these SCAR primers showed high sensitivity, with LOD scores ranging from 10 to 100 pg [22,23]. Finally, we confirmed the mislabeled products among the 21 commercial samples.
The genetic assay developed in this study is anticipated to be a useful technique for the standardization and quality control of PR and MRC herbal medicines. Furthermore, this assay could be used for the rapid identification of closely related species such as Paeonia species.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material and DNA Extraction

Thirty-five samples belonging to four species, P. lactiflora, P. japonica, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and P. suffruticosa, were used in this study. These samples were collected from South Korea and China, and specimens identified by plant taxonomists and ecologists were deposited in the KIOM herbarium (index herbarium [IH] code: KIOM). Genomic DNA was extracted using the DNeasy® Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA quality and quantity were measured using an ND-1000 UV/Vis spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, DE, USA).

4.2. DNA Barcoding Analysis

The ITS region was amplified using ITS1 (5′-TCC GTA GGT GAA CCT GCG G-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC-3′) primers, and the rbcL region was amplified using the rbcL-F (5′-ATG TCA CCA CAA ACA GAA ACT AAA GC-3′) and rbcL-R (5′-TCC TTT TAG TAA AAG ATT GGG CGG AG-3′) primers [24,25]. Each PCR reaction contained 0.5 µM forward and reverse primers, SolgTM 2× Taq PCR Smart-Mix I (Solgent, Daejeon, Korea), and approximately 10 ng of DNA template. PCR conditions are as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 2 min; 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 53 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 2 min; and a final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. Subsequent experiments were performed as described previously. Sequence information of 35 samples was analyzed by ClustalW using the BioEdit software version 7.2.5 (Raleigh, NC, USA) created by Thomas A. Hall.

4.3. SCAR Primer Design and PCR Assay Verification

Primers were designed based on the nucleotide sequence variation among species. Species-specific primers were designed in the ITS region for P. japonica, P. anomala subsp. veitchii, and P. suffruticosa, and in the rbcL region for P. lactiflora. PCR reactions were prepared as described in Section 4.2. To determine the optimal annealing temperature, gradient PCR was performed at 55–65 °C. Then, using 63 °C as the optimal annealing temperature, PCR was performed as follows: initial denaturation (95 °C for 2 min); 35 cycles of denaturation, annealing, and extension (95 °C for 30 s, 63 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s, respectively); and final extension (72 °C for 5 min). Experimental verification for species specificity was carried out in three replicates. Twenty-one herbal medicine-related plant species (Table 2) were tested to verify the specificity of the SCAR primer pairs.

4.4. Sensitivity and Discriminability of SCAR Primers

The sensitivity of SCAR primers was analyzed using 10-fold serial dilutions (10 ng–10 fg) of the genomic DNA of the target species. Discriminability was evaluated using mixed DNA samples, which were prepared by mixing the ground leaf tissue of two to four species (1 g each), followed by DNA extraction as described in Section 4.1. PCR reaction composition and thermocycling conditions were the same as described in Section 4.3. Experimental verification for sensitivity was carried out in three replicates.

4.5. Monitoring of Commercial PR and MRC Samples

A total of 21 commercial products (16 PR and 5 MRC) were analyzed in this study. Identification based on morphological evaluation was performed by herbologists. Genetic evaluation was conducted by performing the SCAR assay and DNA barcoding analysis. Briefly, 10 g of each sample was subjected to DNA extraction as described above (Section 4.1), and PCR was performed as described in Section 4.3. Finally, DNA barcoding analysis was carried out using the ITS region.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/plants11212870/s1. Table S1. List of 35 Paeonia accessions examined in this study. Figure S1. Specimens (A–D) of Paeonia species and photos (E–H) of herbal medicine. Figure S2. Multiple sequence alignment of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of 35 Paeonia accessions. Figure S3: Multiple sequence alignment of the rbcL region of 35 Paeonia accessions. Figure S4. Assessment of the specificity of SCAR primers using 21 herbal medicine-related plant species. Figure S5. Morphological assay of PR and MRC samples sold in the Korean herbal market. Figure S6. Multiple sequence alignment of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of PR and MRC sold in the Korean herbal market.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.C.M.; methodology, B.C.M. and W.J.K.; software, S.N. and W.J.K.; validation, S.N. and W.J.K.; formal analysis, W.J.K.; investigation, B.C.M. and W.J.K.; resources, B.C.M. and G.C.; data curation, B.C.M. and W.J.K.; writing—original draft preparation, W.J.K. and B.C.M.; writing—review and editing, B.C.M. and W.J.K.; visualization, W.J.K.; supervision, B.C.M.; project administration, B.C.M.; funding acquisition, B.C.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by a Korea Innovation Foundation (INNIPOLIS) grant funded by the Korean government (Ministry of Science and ICT) through a science and technology project that opens the future of the region (grant number: 2021-DD-UP-0380) and the Development of Sustainable Application for Standard Herbal Resources (grant no. KSN2021320).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Defining Dictionary for Medicinal Herbs; Hanyak Giwon Sajeon: Naju, Korea, 2022; Available online: https://oasis.kiom.re.kr/herblib/hminfo/hbmcod/hbmcodList.do (accessed on 4 July 2022).
  2. Li, X.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Xu, B.; Yu, Y.; Wang, X. Molecularly imprinted solid phase extraction in a syringe filter for determination of triazine herbicides in Radix Paeoniae Alba by ultra-fast liquid chromatography. Talanta 2016, 148, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Korean Medicinal Materials, 1st ed.; Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine: Daejeon, Korea, 2014; pp. 280–287. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kim, W.J.; Yang, S.; Choi, G.; Moon, B.C. Peptide nucleic acid based molecular authentication for identification of four medicinal paeonia species using melting array analysis of the internal transcribed spacer 2 region. Molecules 2017, 22, 1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Shi, Y.H.; Zhu, S.; Ge, Y.W.; Toume, K.; Wang, Z.; Batkhuu, J.; Komatsu, K. Characterization and quantification of monoterpenoids in different types of peony root and the related Paeonia species by liquid chromatography coupled with ion trap and time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2016, 129, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kim, J.; Lee, H.; Lee, Y.; Oh, B.G.; Cho, C.; Kim, Y.; Shin, M.; Hong, M.; Jung, S.K.; Bae, H. Inhibition effects of Moutan Cortex Radicis on secretion of eotaxin in A549 human epithelial cells and eosinophil migration. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 114, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kim, W.J.; Moon, B.C.; Yang, S.; Han, K.S.; Choi, G.; Lee, A.Y. Rapid authentication of the herbal medicine plant species aralia continentalis Kitag. and Angelica biserrata C.Q. Yuan and R.H. Shan Using ITS2 sequences and Multiplex-SCAR markers. Molecules 2016, 21, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ameenah, G.-F. Medicinal plants: Traditions of yesterday and drugs of tomorrow. Mol. Asp. Med. 2006, 27, 1–93. [Google Scholar]
  9. Khalil, A.A.K.; Zeb, F.; Khan, R.; Shah, S.A.; Akkol, E.K.; Khan, I.N.; Khan, J.; Jamal, S.B.; Khuda, F.; Haider, A.; et al. An overview on Rumex dentatus L.: Its functions as a source of nutrient and health-promoting plant. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2022, 2022, 8649119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ko, H.L.; Jung, E.H.; Jung, D.H.; Kim, J.K.; Ku, S.K.; Kim, Y.W.; Kim, S.C.; Zhao, R.; Lee, C.W.; Cho, I.J. Paeonia japonica root extract protects hepatocytes against oxidative stress through inhibition of AMPK-mediated GSK3β. J. Funct. Foods 2016, 20, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhao, D.D.; Jiang, L.L.; Li, H.Y.; Yan, P.F.; Zhang, Y.L. Chemical components and pharmacological activities of terpene natural products from the genus Paeonia. Molecules 2016, 21, 1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Nazar, N.; Howard, C.; Slater, A.; Sgamma, T. Challenges in medicinal and aromatic plants DNA barcoding—Lessons from the Lamiaceae. Plants 2022, 11, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, W.J.; Yang, S.; Choi, G.; Park, I.; Noh, P.; Seo, C.S.; Moon, B.C. Development of conventional PCR and real-time PCR assays to discriminate the origins of Chinese pepper oil and herbal materials from Zanthoxylum. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2019, 99, 2021–2029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, S.; Yao, H.; Han, J.; Liu, C.; Song, J.; Shi, L.; Zhu, Y.; Ma, X.; Gao, T.; Pang, X.; et al. Validation of the ITS2 region as a novel DNA barcode for identifying medicinal plant species. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Noh, P.; Kim, W.J.; Yang, S.; Park, I.; Moon, B.C. Authentication of the herbal medicine Angelicae Dahuricae Radix using an ITS sequence-based multiplex SCAR assay. Molecules 2018, 23, 2134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Kim, W.J.; Yang, S.; Choi, G.; Park, I.; Noh, P.; Lee, A.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Moon, B.C. Establishment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR assays for accurate, rapid and quantitative authentication of four mistletoe species. Phytochemistry 2020, 176, 112400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Cho, J.; Jeon, S.; Song, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Jeong, J.; Choi, G.; Lee, S. Identification of toxic herbs using deep learning with focus on the sinomenium acutum, aristolochiae manshuriensis caulis, akebiae caulis. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. He, C.; Peng, Y.; Xiao, W.; Liu, H.; Xiao, P.G. Determination of chemical variability of phenolic and monoterpene glycosides in the seeds of Paeonia species using HPLC and profiling analysis. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 2108–2114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, C.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xu, L.; Gu, J.; Xiao, P. Phytochemical and biological studies of Paeoniaceae. Chem. Biodivers. 2010, 7, 805–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moon, B.C.; Choo, B.K.; Cheon, M.S.; Yoon, T.; Ji, Y.; Kim, B.B.; Lee, A.Y.; Kim, H.K. Rapid molecular authentication of three medicinal plant species, Cynanchum wilfordii, Cynanchum auriculatum, and Polygonum multiflorum (Fallopia multiflorum), by the development of RAPD-derived SCAR markers and multiplex-PCR. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 2010, 4, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kim, M.K.; Wang, H.; Kim, Y.J.; Sathiyamoorthy, S.; Kwon, W.S.; Yang, D.C. Molecular authentication by multiplex-PCR of three similar medicinal plant species: Cynanchum wilfordii, Cynanchum auriculatum and Polygonum multiflorum (Fallopia multiflorum). J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 4, 2584–2589. [Google Scholar]
  22. Noh, P.; Kim, W.J.; Yang, S.; Choi, G.; Moon, B.C. PCR-based rapid diagnostic tools for the authentication of medicinal mistletoe species. Phytomedicine 2021, 91, 153667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, W.J.; Yang, S.; Choi, G.; Park, I.; Noh, P.; Kim, M.J.; Moon, B.C. Accurate and rapid identification of longan arillus and litchi semen by a multiplex pcr assay. Plants 2020, 9, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. White, T.J.; Bruns, T.; Lee, S.; Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA Genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols; Academic Press Inc.: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1990; pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  25. Olmstead, R.G.; Reeves, P.A. Evidence for the polyphyly of the Scrophulariaceae based on chloroplast rbcL and ndhF sequences. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 1995, 82, 176–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Specificity of the SCAR primers using the conventional PCR assay. SCAR primer combinations (PL-F/-R, PJ-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R) are shown on the left. ‘M’ indicates the 100 bp DNA ladder, and the sizes of different bands (100 bp, 500 bp, and 1.0 kb) are indicated on the left. Arrows and numbers on the right indicate the amplicon size.
Figure 1. Specificity of the SCAR primers using the conventional PCR assay. SCAR primer combinations (PL-F/-R, PJ-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R) are shown on the left. ‘M’ indicates the 100 bp DNA ladder, and the sizes of different bands (100 bp, 500 bp, and 1.0 kb) are indicated on the left. Arrows and numbers on the right indicate the amplicon size.
Plants 11 02870 g001
Figure 2. Assessment of the sensitivity of SCAR primers using the conventional PCR assay. Primer combinations (PL-F/-R, PJ-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R) are indicated on the left. Arrows and numbers situated on the right indicate the amplicon size. M is the 100 bp DNA ladder. Yellow asterisks indicated the limit of detection (LOD).
Figure 2. Assessment of the sensitivity of SCAR primers using the conventional PCR assay. Primer combinations (PL-F/-R, PJ-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R) are indicated on the left. Arrows and numbers situated on the right indicate the amplicon size. M is the 100 bp DNA ladder. Yellow asterisks indicated the limit of detection (LOD).
Plants 11 02870 g002
Figure 3. Assessment of the discriminability of SCAR primers using mixed DNA samples. The composition of each DNA sample is shown on the top using different colored squares (blue, P. lactiflora; green, P. japonica; red, P. anomala subsp. veitchii; yellow, P. suffruticosa). SCAR primer combinations (PL-F/-R, PJ-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R) and 100 bp, 500 bp, and 1.0 kb bands of the 100 bp DNA marker (M) are indicated on the left. Arrows and numbers on the right indicate the amplicon size.
Figure 3. Assessment of the discriminability of SCAR primers using mixed DNA samples. The composition of each DNA sample is shown on the top using different colored squares (blue, P. lactiflora; green, P. japonica; red, P. anomala subsp. veitchii; yellow, P. suffruticosa). SCAR primer combinations (PL-F/-R, PJ-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R) and 100 bp, 500 bp, and 1.0 kb bands of the 100 bp DNA marker (M) are indicated on the left. Arrows and numbers on the right indicate the amplicon size.
Plants 11 02870 g003
Figure 4. SCAR assay of PR and MRC samples sold in the Korean herbal market. SCAR primer combinations (PL-F/-R, PJ-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R) and 100 bp, 500 bp, and 1.0 kb bands of the 100 bp DNA marker (M) are indicated on the left. List information is provided in Table S1 and Table 3. Arrows and numbers on the right indicate amplicon size. Special characters (* and #) indicate inconsistencies between the results of morphological and genetic assays.
Figure 4. SCAR assay of PR and MRC samples sold in the Korean herbal market. SCAR primer combinations (PL-F/-R, PJ-F/-R, PA-F/-R, and PS-F/-R) and 100 bp, 500 bp, and 1.0 kb bands of the 100 bp DNA marker (M) are indicated on the left. List information is provided in Table S1 and Table 3. Arrows and numbers on the right indicate amplicon size. Special characters (* and #) indicate inconsistencies between the results of morphological and genetic assays.
Plants 11 02870 g004
Table 1. Details of primers used to perform the conventional PCR assay.
Table 1. Details of primers used to perform the conventional PCR assay.
Primer NameTarget SpeciesPrimer Sequence (5′→3′) 1Amplicon Size (bp)DNA Barcoding Region Used for SCAR Primers
PL-FP. lactifloraTTT CTT ATT TTG TGC AGA AGC CC430rbcL
PL-RACG ACT TCG GTC TTT TTC AAT AT
PJ-FP. japonicaGAA CTT GTA AAA ATG CTC GGT G129ITS
PJ-RCCG AGA GCA CAC CAG AAG G
PA-FP. anomala subsp. veitchii AAG GCG TGA GCC TCT CCT C492ITS
PA-RGTT CGT CGC TCG GGG CTG A
PS-FP. suffruticosaCTC CTT CAT CCC ACG TCC CA573ITS
PS-RTCG TGA CGA TGC TCT GGG GTT
1 Bold underlined character indicate the arbitrary sequence.
Table 2. Analysis of the specificity of SCAR primers using 21 herbal medicine-related plant species.
Table 2. Analysis of the specificity of SCAR primers using 21 herbal medicine-related plant species.
Herbal MedicinePlant SpeciesDNA Amplification 1
PL-F/-RPJ-F/-RPA-F/-RPS-F/-R
Paeoniae RadixPaeonia lactiflora+
Paeoniae RadixPaeonia japonica+
Paeoniae RadixPaeonia anomala subsp. veitchii +
Moutan Radicis CortexPaeonia suffruticosa+
Ginseng RadixPanax ginseng
Glycyrrhizae Radix et RhizomaGlycyrrhiza uralensis
Cnidii RhizomaCnidium officinale
Angelicae Gigantis RadixAngelica gigas
Schisandra FruitSchisandra chinensis
Zanthoxylum PeelZanthoxylum schinifolium
Aralia Continentalis RootAralia continentalis
Cynanchi Wilfordii RadixCynanchum wilfordii
Angelica Dahurica RootAngelica dahurica
Akebia StemAkebia quinata
Visci Ramulus et FoliumViscum coloratum
Adenophorae RadixAdenophora stricta
Siegesbeckiae HerbaSigesbeckia orientalis subsp. pubescens
Rhei Undulatai RhizomaRheum rhabarbarum
Magnoliae CortexMachilus thunbergii
Scutellariae RadixScutellaria baicalensis
Clematidis RadixClematis terniflora var. mandshurica
Armeniacae SemenPrunus armeniaca var. ansu
Trichosanthis SemenTrichosanthes kirilowii
Ulmi CortexUlmus macrocarpa
Prunellae SpicaPrunella vulgaris subsp. asiatica
1 ‘+’ Indicates amplicon detected; ‘–’ indicates no amplification.
Table 3. Morphological and genetic evaluation of herbal medicines sold as PR and MRC in the Korean herbal market.
Table 3. Morphological and genetic evaluation of herbal medicines sold as PR and MRC in the Korean herbal market.
Herbal MedicineSample No.Voucher No.Sample Identity Based on Different Assays 1
Morphological AssaySCAR
Assay
DNA Barcoding Assay of the ITS Region
PR12-19-0431P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
22-17-0572P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
32-17-0358P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
42-17-0035P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
52-16-0174P. japonicaP. japonicaP. japonica
62-16-0124P. japonicaP. japonicaP. japonica
72-15-0201P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
82-14-0200P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
92-14-0017P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
102-12-0114P. japonicaP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
112-12-0105P. anomala  subsp. veitchiiP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
122-12-0032P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
132-12-0010P. japonicaP. japonicaP. japonica
142-11-0130P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
152-11-0073P. lactifloraP. lactifloraP. lactiflora
162-07-0034P. anomala subsp. veitchiiP. anomala subsp. veitchiiP. anomala subsp. veitchii
MRC12-19-0414P. suffruticosaP. suffruticosaP. suffruticosa
22-17-0559P. suffruticosaP. suffruticosaP. suffruticosa
32-16-0158P. suffruticosaP. suffruticosaP. suffruticosa
42-16-0138P. suffruticosaP. suffruticosaP. suffruticosa
52-14-0085P. suffruticosaP. suffruticosaP. suffruticosa
1 Inconsistent results are indicated in bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, W.J.; Noh, S.; Choi, G.; Moon, B.C. Rapid Identification of Paeoniae Radix and Moutan Radicis Cortex Using a SCAR Marker-Based Conventional PCR Assay. Plants 2022, 11, 2870. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212870

AMA Style

Kim WJ, Noh S, Choi G, Moon BC. Rapid Identification of Paeoniae Radix and Moutan Radicis Cortex Using a SCAR Marker-Based Conventional PCR Assay. Plants. 2022; 11(21):2870. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212870

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Wook Jin, Sumin Noh, Goya Choi, and Byeong Cheol Moon. 2022. "Rapid Identification of Paeoniae Radix and Moutan Radicis Cortex Using a SCAR Marker-Based Conventional PCR Assay" Plants 11, no. 21: 2870. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11212870

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop