Next Article in Journal
Confirmation and Fine Mapping of the Resistance Locus Ren9 from the Grapevine Cultivar ‘Regent’
Next Article in Special Issue
Application of Exogenous Phytohormones at Silking Stage Improve Grain Quality under Post-Silking Drought Stress in Waxy Maize
Previous Article in Journal
Plant Sources Responsible for the Chemical Composition and Main Bioactive Properties of Poplar-Type Propolis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluating the Contribution of Growth, Physiological, and Ionic Components Towards Salinity and Drought Stress Tolerance in Jatropha curcas
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Plants
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/plants10010023
plants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-Pentakisphosphate 2-Kinase 1 Mutant with a 33-nt Deletion Showed Enhanced Tolerance to Salt and Drought Stress in Rice

by
Meng Jiang
1,2,
Yanhua Liu
1,
Ruiqing Li
3,
Shan Li
1,
Yuanyuan Tan
1,
Jianzhong Huang
1,4 and
Qingyao Shu
1,2,*
1
National Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Crop Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
2
Hainan Institute of Zhejiang University, Yongyou Industry Park, Yazhou Bay Sci-Tech City, Sanya 572000, China
3
College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036, China
4
Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Plants 2021, 10(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010023
Submission received: 29 November 2020 / Revised: 22 December 2020 / Accepted: 22 December 2020 / Published: 24 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop and Medical Plants)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
OsIPK1 encodes inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase, which catalyzes the conversion of myo-inositol-1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate to myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate (IP6) in rice. By clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein (Cas9)-mediated mutagenesis in the 3rd exon of the gene, three OsIPK1 mutations, i.e., osipk1_1 (a 33-nt deletion), osipk1_2 (a 1-nt deletion), and osipk1_3 (a 2-nt deletion) were identified in T0 plants of the rice line Xidao #1 (wild type, WT). A transfer DNA free line with the homozygous osipk1_1 mutation was developed; however, no homozygous mutant lines could be developed for the other two mutations. The comparative assay showed that the osipk1_1 mutant line had a significantly lower level of phytic acid (PA, IP6; −19.5%) in rice grain and agronomic traits comparable to the WT. However, the osipk1_1 mutant was more tolerant to salt and drought stresses than the WT, with significantly lower levels of inositol triphosphate (IP3), reactive oxygen species (ROS) and induced IP6, and higher activities of antioxidant enzymes in seedlings subjected to these stresses. Further analyses showed that the transcription of stress response genes was significantly upregulated in the osipk1_1 mutant under stress. Thus, the low phytic acid mutant osipk1_1 should have potential applications in rice breeding and production.

1. Introduction

Phytic acid (PA), also identified as Myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate (IP6), is thought to be the main storage form of nutrient phosphorous (P) (~80%) constituting ~1.6% of the dry biomass in crop grains [1]. In seeds of most cereal, IP6 occurs as phytates in the protein bodies, which chelate with several divalent metal ions e.g., Ca2+, Zn2+, Mg2+, and Fe2+ [2]. During seed germination, endogenous phytase activity is induced and hydrolyzes the PA, releasing bound mineral cations, stored phosphorus (P), and inorganic phosphorus (Pi) that are utilized for seedling growth [3]. Due to the lack of phytase, monogastric animals cannot utilize PA and the micronutrients in phytates as a nutrient source [4]. Furthermore, the undigested phytic acid phosphorus (PA-P) in animal wastes has gradually become one of the main causes of P pollution [5]. Because of these PA-related environmental and nutritional adverse effects, mutagenesis and biotechnological approaches have been used to produce low phytic acid (lpa) mutant lines in cereals [6] such as maize [3,7], wheat [8], and rice [9,10,11,12,13].
Twelve genes predicted to encode enzymes in the PA metabolism pathway have been identified in rice seeds [14]. Mutations of these genes are recognized to create the phenotypes of LPA in cereals [5]. Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase 1 (IPK1) is reportedly to catalyze the final step in the biosynthesis of IP6, by which the inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate (IP5) is further phosphorylated at position 2 to form IP6 [14,15,16,17]. The pathway of IP6 biosynthesis reported in Saccharomyces cerevisiae [17] and Dictyostelium discoideum share the last step: the phosphorylation of IP5 to IP6 by IPK1 designated as a 2-kinase enzyme. The IPK1 mutant in S. cerevisiae presented a reduction in the capability to transfer mRNA from the nucleus and exhibited comprehensive incapability to synthesize PA. The AtIpk1-1 gene was examined in Arabidopsis using T-DNA insertion mutant, and the IP6 level was decreased in the AtIpk1-1 mutant by 83% [18]. Ali et al. [19] produced transgenic rice by down-regulating the OsIPK1 expression using an RNAi-mediated technique. The reduction in IP6 content and concomitant increase in phosphate (Pi) level were found in transgenic rice plants with a seed-specific decrease in the gene expression of OsIPK1. The seed germination and some agronomic characteristics of transgenic rice were similar to the wild type (WT) [19]. These findings are consistent with earlier research indicating that the mutations of IPK1 gene had no adverse effects on seed viability and agronomic performances in soybean [20,21].
The association of inositol phosphates in molecular and cellular responses of plants to abiotic stresses has been investigated. For instance, IP3 was found to be transiently induced in plants under abscisic acid and salt stress [22,23]. The physiological and molecular proof of the role of IPK1 in the response to abiotic stresses is vague, although inositol phosphates are recognized as signaling molecules in the response to stresses. The clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9), which is a precise and efficient approach for genome editing [24,25,26], has been used in crop breeding, particularly for generating low phytic acid (lpa) rice. In this study, we generated osipk1 mutants by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis and analyzed seed accumulation of phosphorus (total phosphorus, TP; phytic acid phosphorus, PA-P; inorganic phosphorus, Pi), agronomic traits, seed germination, and stress tolerance with the aim to evaluate and explore the probability of producing the LPA rice with no adverse effect on agronomic traits and seed viability, and with better tolerance to salt and drought stresses.

2. Results

2.1. Mutations of OsIPK1 and Development of Homozygous Transgene-Free Mutant Lines

A homozygous osipk1_1 mutant line with a 33-nt deletion in the third exon of the gene was generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis. Twenty-one hygromycin phosphotransferase (HPT)-positive T0 rice seedlings were selected from transformation with the vector of CRISPR/Cas9, pH_ipk1, and eight rice seedlings were finally verified mutated at the position of target. This signifies an editing efficiency of 38.1%, which manifests that the pH_ipk1 is efficient. Eventually, one homozygous transgene-free osipk1 mutant (osipk1_1) and two heterozygous transgene-free osipk1 mutants (osipk1_2 and osipk1_3) (Figure 1A) were selected in T0 plants. Rice seeds of the mutated T0 seedlings were harvested and planted as lines of T1 plants. Interestingly, we found that no presence of homozygous transgene-free in T1 plants of osipk1_2 and osipk1_3, whereas we can test some homozygous osipk1_2 and osipk1_3 mutations in the seeds which were not germinated. The same findings also appeared in the T2 and advanced-generation plants, so the heterozygous osipk1_2 and osipk1_3 mutants could not be used for further analysis. This may be due to a serious decline in phytic acid content in these IPK1 knock-out plants, which prevented seeds from germinating. Approximately ten surviving seedlings of the T1 line of osipk1_1 were verified for the presence of target mutations and T-DNA at the seedling stage after bentazon treatment. All T1 seedlings of the selected line were further confirmed for both the presence of mutation and T-DNA. Rice seeds from the confirmed homozygous, transgene-free mutant seedlings selected as the mutant line osipk1_1, were harvested and used for further evaluation.
The mutation of osipk1_1 (a 33-nt deletion) would cause an 11-amino acids fragment missing from amino acid positions 65 to 75 (Figure S1). Investigation of IPK1 proteins in nine organisms implied that the loss of 11-amino acids in the osipk1_1 mutant was positioned in a highly conserved segment (Figure S2), signifying that the osipk1_1 mutation could have potential functional consequences. In contrast, other mutations, osipk1_3 (a 2-nt deletion) and osipk1_2 (a 1-nt deletion) would produce a premature stop codon almost right after the site of mutation (Figure S1). Consequently, the mutant alleles of osipk1_3 and osipk1_2 were predicted to generate proteins with only 75 and 89 amino acids (Figure 1B and Figure S1). This may be the major reason why the homozygous transgene-free osipk1_2 and osipk1_3 mutants could not germinate.

2.2. Plant Growth and Phosphorus Content of Osipk1_1 Mutant

Plant growth of osipk1_1 was comparable with WT. No significant differences in the plant height, panicle length, tiller numbers per plant, seed-set, and 1000-grain weight were observed between Xidao 1 and osipk1_1 (Figure 2A–E). The seed germination rate of osipk1_1 was lower in the first four days, but caught up with that of the WT after five days, and almost the same on the 7th day (Figure 2F).
The colorimetric assay showed that osipk1_1 had a similar Pi level to the WT control (Figure 3A). To measure the mutational effects of osipk1_1, the contents of Pi, PA-P, and TP were evaluated in seeds between the mutant line and WT. The osipk1_1 mutant line had greatly lower PA-P and TP content compared with the control, while the content of Pi was not greatly different from that of WT (Figure 3B–D). The seeds of WT had a Pi level of 0.29 mg/g, which was not significantly different from the osipk1_1 mutant line (Figure 3B). osipk1_1 had a PA-P level of 1.88 mg/g, which was 19.5% lower than the control (2.34 mg/g) (Figure 3C). osipk1_1 had TP content of 2.60 mg/g, which were 17.6% lower than the control (3.16 mg/g) (Figure 3D).

2.3. Mutant of Osipk1_1 Has a Better Tolerance against Drought or Salt Stress than Wild Type (WT)

To verify whether the mutant of osipk1_1 also has any effect on stress tolerance, we tested the osipk1_1 and WT seedlings to salt and drought stress treatment. The growth of osipk1_1 seedling was similar to that of the WT when grown under normal conditions, while better than the control under either salt (100 mM NaCl) or drought (20 mM mannitol) stress conditions (Figure 4A).
After 7-day treatment by 20 mM mannitol or 100 mM NaCl, the plant height, root length, and dry biomass of WT seedlings were greatly decreased (Figure 4B–D). In contrast, the plant height, root length, and dry biomass of osipk1_1 were significantly higher than that of WT plants after stress treatments (Figure 4B–D), signifying that the mutant of osipk1_1 is much more tolerant against drought or salt stress than WT seedlings.

2.4. The Osipk1_1 Mutant Accumulated Less Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) than WT under Salt and Drought Stresses

To explore how mutation of osipk1_1 alleviated salt and drought stress, we measured the contents of IP3, IP6, stress-related free amino acid proline (Pro), ROS (H2O2), malondialdehyde (MDA), and anti-oxidant enzyme activities (peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD)) in seedlings subjected to stresses (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). Without treatment, all these parameters were not significantly different between WT and osipk1_1.
Firstly, we found that the level of IP3 was significantly increased after salt or drought stress treatment in WT, i.e., by 1.62-fold with salt stress, and by 1.69-fold with drought stress, respectively, relative to control after treatment for seven days (Figure 5A). The content of IP3 was also significantly increased in osipk1_1, but was still lower than that in WT after one-week treatment of salt or drought stress (Figure 5A). We also observed that seven days of stress treatment greatly reduced the accumulation of IP6 in WT (Figure 5B). In contrast, a significantly increased level of IP6 was observed in osipk1_1 compared to WT (Figure 5B).
Secondly, we found that the accumulation of Pro, H2O2, and MDA were significantly increased after salt or drought stress treatment in WT (Figure 6). Following a one-week salt or drought stress treatment, the contents of Pro, H2O2, and MDA were also elevated in the mutant of osipk1_1, although with less magnitude as those of WT (Figure 6).
Thirdly, we found that seven days of stress treatment greatly decreased the anti-oxidant enzymes (POD, CAT, and SOD) activities, relative to control in WT (Figure 7). Following seven days of stress treatment, the anti-oxidant enzymes activities of CAT, POD, and SOD were also decreased in the mutant of osipk1_1, while with less magnitude compared those of WT (Figure 7).
These findings exhibited that osipk1_1 decreased the ROS level and mitigated oxidative stresses with induced antioxidant enzyme activities and decreased level of IP3, compared to WT, under drought and salt stresses.

2.5. Transcription of Stress Response Genes Was Significantly Upregulated in the Osipk1_1 Mutant under Stress

To explore the molecular mechanism of how osipk1_1 enhanced stress tolerance, the analysis of gene expression was conducted for phytic acid biosynthetic genes and stress-related genes in rice plants.
Mutant of osipk1_1 had a significantly higher abundance of phytic acid biosynthesis genes (except for OsIPK1) in the absence of stress treatment (Figure S3). Gene expression of OsIPK2, OsITPK1, OsITPK2, OsITPK3, and OsITPK6 were significantly induced, while OsIPK1, OsITPK4, and OsITPK5 expression were significantly decreased in WT after treatment (Figure S3). In osipk1_1, the abundance of OsIPK2, OsITPK1, OsITPK2, OsITPK3, and OsITPK6 were significantly lower and OsIPK1, OsITPK4, and OsITPK5 were significantly higher compared to WT seedlings after treatment (Figure S3).
The expression of stress responsive genes was not significantly different between WT and osipk1_1 without treatment (Figure 8). Exposure to salt and drought stress greatly induced the transcription of all eight tested genes (OsPOX8.1, OsPOX8.1, OsP5CS, OsRab16D, OsGDSL, OsbZIP23, OsSNAC1, and OsDRB1A) in WT (Figure 8). Furthermore, osipk1_1 had a significantly increased abundance of these stress-response genes with salt and drought treatment compared to WT seedlings (Figure 8).
These results demonstrated that the expression of phytic acid biosynthetic genes was deregulated and stress-response genes were significantly up-regulated in osipk1_1 mutant under salt and drought stress conditions.

3. Discussion

The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been broadly utilized in plant functional genomics studies. Our study intended to offer such an instance on the manipulation of PA content in rice grains by targeted mutagenesis of a PA synthesis gene. To develop rice genetic resources with agronomically competitive LPA, we targeted mutagenesis of osipk1 using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technology in this research. The homozygous and transgene-free mutant, named as the mutant line of osipk1_1, was evaluated for its seed P level together with the WT. The mutant line had significantly lower PA-P and TP contents compared with the control, while the Pi had no significant difference compared to the WT (Figure 3). IPK1 is believed to catalyze the last step in inositol metabolism by using the inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentaphosphate as the substrate [14,15,16,17]. This process only adds one phosphate group, which may result in a significantly decreased level of phytic acid, while the Pi content of osipk1_1 does not significantly change. By contrast, the Pi level of transgenic rice was increased and the TP was similar to the WT [19]. In our present study, the agronomic traits and seed germination rate of osipk1_1 were not significantly different from those of the WT, which was similar to the results of Ali et al. [19]. It was reported that seed-specific downregulation of OsIPK1 did not negatively affect agronomic traits, but increased tolerance to artificial aging and seed viability [19]. The findings implied that the editing of the OsIPK1 gene in rice seeds might be a valid way to generate LPA rice.
Terrestrial plants are frequently faced with numerous abiotic stresses throughout their whole life. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses to such stresses are mediated by a group of signal transduction pathways. Former studies have found that IP3 can be a vital second messenger, which always displays a transient induction upon exposure to exogenous stimuli, e.g., pathogens, reactive oxygen, light, osmotic, and salt stresses [23,27,28]. The relationship between abiotic stresses and metabolism of IP3 has been observed in mammalian cells and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) [22,23,29], but very little research has been described regarding the association between abiotic stresses and inositol phosphates in terrestrial plants. In tomato plants, genetically decreasing IP3 by increasing InsP3 hydrolysis caused enhanced drought stress tolerance [30]. The content of IP3 in osipk1_1 was increased by salt and drought stresses in WT and showed a reduced level in osipk1_1 (Figure 5A). Delineation of the stress-insensitive phenotype of osipk1_1 would help understand the stress signaling pathway leading to less accumulation of IP3 and a non-standard level of a secondary messenger.
Free proline has been considered to contribute to the protection of macromolecules during dehydration [31] and the osmotic adjustment [32] as well as to be an important scavenger of hydroxyl radical [33]. The free proline content was induced following stress treatment but significantly lower in osipk1_1 (Figure 6C). A similar change was observed for MDA (Figure 6B), which is an important intermediate in ROS scavenging under abiotic stress, and is toxic to the plant cells if over accumulated [34,35]. The activities of antioxidant enzymes can be inducible by oxidative stresses produced by salt and drought stresses. In this study, however, POD, CAT, and SOD activities were lower after treatment of 100 mM NaCl and 20 mM mannitol (Figure 7). Phytic acid is a natural antioxidant in plants, constituting 1–5% of most legumes, nuts, oilseeds, cereals, spores, and pollen [36,37]. Although IP6 was significantly reduced by salt or drought stress in both WT and mutant, a significantly higher level occurred in osipk1_1 (Figure 5B). It is inferred that more accumulation of IP6 will alleviate the stresses of salinity and drought. The decreased activities of antioxidant enzymes and phytic acid may have resulted from the oxidative burst in plants under salt and drought stresses as revealed by the ROS level, e.g., H2O2 (Figure 6A) in stressed plants. These oxidative stresses appeared to be greatly alleviated in osipk1_1 (Figure 6), signifying that improvement of the capacity of anti-oxidant defense is the main mechanism for mitigation of abiotic stress toxicity in rice seedlings of osipk1_1. Our findings propose that osipk1_1 had improved capacity for ROS scavenging and osmotic adjustment.
We further examine whether the expression of OsIPK2 and the other six ITPK members in rice have any changes in osipk1_1 under salt or drought stress. The OsITPK genes’ exon-intron organization structures suggest that three ITPKs in rice (OsITPK1, OsITPK2, and OsITPK3) belong to subgroup I, with each including 9 introns and 10 exons with similar phases [38]. OsITPK4 and OsITPK5 included no intron and belong to subgroup II. OsITPK6, belonging to subgroup III, have 11 introns and 12 exons. The analysis of the expression level proposes that the strictly related OsITPKs have small differences in the patterns of gene expression in their responses to various stresses.
Previous studies showed that OsPOX22.3 and OsPOX8.1, both encoding plastidic peroxidases, are involved in the tolerance to oxidative stress [39]. OsP5CS (LOC_Os05g38150) encodes an important enzyme for biosynthesis of proline and OsGDSL (LOC_Os02g57110), a GDSL-like lipase gene, was increased by osmotic stress [40]. OsSKIPa (LOC_Os02g52250), OsbZIP23 (LOC_Os02g52780), SNAC1 (LOC_Os11g03300), and OsDREB1A (LOC_Os09g35030), all being transcription factor genes, were also reported to be responsible for the tolerance to oxidative stress [41,42,43,44]. The gene expression levels of the above genes were greatly higher in osipk1_1 than that in the WT under abiotic stress. These findings imply that the transcription factors above are associated with the downstream manipulation of the responses to abiotic stress in osipk1_1.
Since there is only one tested mutant of osipk1 in our research, its excellent performance may be caused by the 33-nt deletion of OsIPK1, but it may also be due to accidental occurrence during the material cultivation process, e.g., tissue culture-derived variation, transposon (Tos17) insertion mutagenesis, pleiotropy. Firstly, antibiotics, like hygromycin in our research, might also enhance variation frequency [45,46], and thus several round screenings of calli on hygromycin-containing media might significantly induce mutations in rice. Second, to generate transgenic plants by using Agrobacterium transformation spent more time than regular tissue culture, while it has been well documented that the longer the tissue culture time, the higher the somaclonal variation frequency, because the somaclonal variation occurred throughout the culture process [47]. Therefore, further studies are needed to ascertain the real causative factor(s) leading to the enhanced tolerance of osipk1_1 to salt and drought stresses. For example, progenies derived from a cross between osipk1_1 and its WT parent could be used for such purposes.
In conclusion, by targeted mutagenesis of the inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase gene using the CRISPR/Cas9 system, we generated osipk1 mutant lines. Physiological, biochemical, and molecular data showed that the osipk1_1 mutant had a better tolerance to salt and drought stresses. While the genetic cause remains undetermined, the enhanced tolerance of osipk1_1 might be exploited in rice breeding.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Generation of Mutants Using Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-Associated Protein (Cas9)

To produce osipk1 mutants, the target site was chosen for OsIPK1 (LOC_Os04g56580/Os04g0661200) in the third exon (Figure 1A). The UniProt (http://www.uniprot.org/) was used for target selection to minimize the off-target effect [48] and the sgRNAs for the precise site were designed by the CRISPR-P 1.0 website (http://crispr.hzau.edu.cn/CRISPR/). DNA base pairing sequence (C1-F and C1-R, Table S1) was synthesized by Tsingke (Hangzhou, China) for the construction of the vector of CRISPR/Cas9 (pH_ipk1) carrying an element of CYP81A6-hpRNAi using the plasmid of pHUN4c12s [49], which was improved from pHUN4c12 [50]. The plasmid pH_ipk1 was created and transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens and introduced into rice calli induced from the mature seed of ‘Xidao 1′ (a japonica rice cultivar) according to Li et al. [51].

4.2. Growth and Identification of Mutants

The transgenic plantlets were regenerated from hygromycin-resistant calli and acclimatized in a growth chamber (a photoperiod of 12 h, 30 °C) for seven days before being moved into outdoor facilities. Total genomic DNA was extracted from leaves of transgenic T0 seedlings according to a modified method of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) [52]. The existence of the gene of hygromycin phosphotransferase (HPT) was tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification using the primer pairs HygR-F and HygR-R (Table S1) [53]. The site-specific mutation was identified by amplification of PCR using primers (P1-F and P1-R, Table S1) encompassing the target sites in the gene of OsIPK1 (Figure 1A). The analysis of high resolution melt (HRM) was carried out according to Li et al. [54] to verify for the mutations. The fragments of a selected target with diverse colored lines on analysis of HRM were sequenced by Tsingke (Hangzhou, China) and the DSDecode (http://skl.scau.edu.cn/dsdecode/) program was used to decode the mutation sequences [55].

4.3. Development of Transgene-Free Mutant Lines

T1 plants were foliar sprayed with 1.0 g·L−1 bentazon (0.1 L·m−2) at approximately four-leaf stage according to Lu et al. [49]. Because CYP81A6, which metabolizes and renders tolerance to bentazon was silenced in the transgenic plants, the transgene-free plants will survive the betazone spraying and the transgenic ones will die. No less than 10 survived T1 plants from every single T0 plants were further verified for the presence of site-specific mutations and absence of T-DNA. The T-DNA free osipk1 mutants were advanced to T2 lines and used for further tests.

4.4. Assay of Agronomic Traits

Xidao #1 (WT) and its transgene-free osipk1 mutant were grown side by side at the facility of Zhijiang Seed Tec. Ltd., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. Sixty seedlings were planted for each line, and 20 randomly chosen inner plants of each plot were assessed for agronomic traits in the field, recorded before and after harvest. Different agronomic parameters, such as 1000-grain weight, seed-set, panicle length, number of tillers per plant, and plant height were evaluated.

4.5. Assay of Seed Germination

For a controlled germination test, the rice seeds were immersed in distilled water at 28 °C for two days and germinated on filter paper immersed with ultrapure water for seven days in darkness at 28 °C. The percentage of germination was noted at regular intervals and assayed. The tests were repeated thrice with 100 seeds for each repeat.

4.6. Assay of Seed Phosphorus

The contents of inorganic P (Pi) in seeds were examined both quantitatively and qualitatively by following the protocol of Chen et al. [56] with slight modifications. The qualitative assay was utilized for observation of the high inorganic P (HIP). The seeds of rice were placed into 96-well plates, mixed with the solution of 0.4 M HCl at 4 °C for 12 h. Aliquots of supernatant (10 μL) were used for the determination of Pi content by following the method of Larson et al. [9]. The colorless samples characterize contents of parent varieties, while the change of a blue color infers induced content of Pi (HIP) (Figure 3A).
The levels of Pi in rice seeds were quantitatively measured by following the method of Wilcox et al. [57] with minor modifications in triplicate. The grains of brown rice were pestled into flour and approximately 0.5 g flour was mixed with trichloroacetic acid including 25 mM MgCl2, 12.5 % (w/v) by gentle shaking at 4 °C for about 12 h. The supernatants were utilized for the assay of Pi by following the method of Raboy et al. [58] after centrifugation for 15 min at 10,000× g.
The accumulation of PA-P was measured for flour of brown rice by following the protocol of McKie et al. [59] using the commercial assay kit (Megazyme, Ireland) in triplicate. Approximately 1 g grains of brown rice was mixed with 20 mL of 0.66 M hydrochloric acid at room temperature for 2 h and then centrifuged for 20 min at 12,000× g. Immediately, the supernatant (0.5 mL) was neutralized by the addition of the same volume solution of 0.75 M sodium hydroxide. The mixed sample extract was used in the procedure of enzymatic dephosphorylation reaction and the absorbance was measured at 655 nm.
The contents of total phosphorus in rice seeds were measured by following the method as previously described in triplicate [60]. Approximately 0.2 g samples of brown rice were digested with 6 mL HNO3 for 60 min at 160 °C in a system of microwave digestion (Mars6, USA). The solution was concentrated for about 120 min at 140 °C until 1 mL digested solution was left, and then diluted into 50 mL distilled water [61]. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (PerkinElmer, USA) was used to analyze the total phosphorus in rice seeds.

4.7. Stresses Treatment

For the treatment of stresses, 14-day-old rice plants were grown in ½ Murashige and Skoog (MS) [62] liquid culture medium, added with 20 mM mannitol or 100 mM NaCl, and then planted for 7 days before collecting the samples. After a 21 d cultivation, rice seedlings were sampled for physiological, biochemical, and molecular assays. The expression levels of genes associated with phytic acid biosynthesis and stress response were measured.

4.8. Measurement of Inositol Triphosphate (IP3) and Phytic Acid (IP6) Content

Inositol triphosphate (IP3) was extracted by following the method of Campion et al. [63]. Approximately 2 g sample of fresh rice leaves was ground and blended in 3 mL 1 N HCl/methanol/chloroform (1.33/1/1). The homogenate was kept for 20 min at 4 °C, and then centrifuged at 3000× g for 20 min (4 °C). The organic phase (bottom) was discarded and the aqueous phase (top) was extracted again with a methanol/chloroform (v/v, 1/1). The top phase was dried in a rotary evaporator, and then suspended in 100 μL distilled water for determination of IP3 content using the commercial assay kit of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Jiangsu Jingmei Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Yancheng, China) [64].
The accumulation of phytic acid (IP6) in rice leaves was extracted and measured by following the protocol as previously described [65]. About 0.3 g of rice leaves were ground and mixed in 10 mL of 0.2 M HCl. The homogenate was kept for 2 h at room temperature, and then centrifuged at 5000× g for 15 min. The supernatant was added with hydrated FeCl3 and then mixed with 6 mL of 5 M NaOH. After added with HNO3, the absorbance of the mixed solution was measured at 510 nm.

4.9. Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) Content Measurement

H2O2 accumulation was determined using the commercial assay kit for H2O2 content (Solarbio, Beijing, China) according to the method described by Zhang et al. [66] and Jiang et al. [67]. Approximately 10 mg of fresh rice leaves were homogenized and mixed with 500 μL acetone followed by centrifugation at 10,000× g for 8 min (4 °C). The supernatant was mixed with an equal volume of detection reagent of H2O2 by vortexing and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance at 415 nm was determined, and the standard curve was used to assay the accumulation of H2O2.

4.10. Determination of Malondialdehyde (MDA)

The level of MDA was measured by following the method of Tang et al. [68]. About 100 mg rice leaves were homogenized and mixed with 10 mL trichloroacetic acid (v/v, 10%). The mixture was centrifuged for 15 min at 12,000× g. The reaction mix solution including 2 mL of thiobarbituric acid and 2 mL of extract was heated for 40 min at 95 °C, and then centrifuged once more for 15 min at 12,000× g after rapid cooling on ice. Finally, the absorbances were measured at 450, 532, and 600 nm.

4.11. Measurement of Free Proline (Pro)

The content of free proline was measured as previously reported [69]. About 1 g of rice tissue samples were ground with an aqueous solution of 3% (v/v) sulfosalicylic acid. After centrifugation at 37 °C at 12,000× g for 15 min, 2 mL of supernatant was added to the same volumes of glacial acetic acid and acidic ninhydrin. This mixture was heated at 95 °C for 40 min, cooled on ice, and then followed by the addition of 4 mL of toluene to extract the colored reaction product separated from the aqueous phase. The absorbance of the toluene phase at 520 nm was determined and the standard curve of proline was utilized to assay the accumulation of free proline.

4.12. Measurement of Anti-Oxidant Enzymes Activities

The activities of anti-oxidant enzymes, peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), were determined as reported [70,71,72,73] by using the commercial kits (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The anti-oxidant enzyme activities were standardized as follows: one unit of POD activity causes the absorbance to induce 0.01 at 470 nm per min; one unit of SOD activity causes the inhibition of photoreduction of 4-nitro blue tetrazolium chloride by 50%; one unit of CAT activity causes reduction of 1 nmol H2O2 per min.

4.13. Analysis of Gene Expression

The RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) was used to extract the total RNA of fresh rice tissues and HiScript III 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China) was used to generate cDNA from total RNA by reverse transcription [74]. AceQ qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) was used to perform quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) and primers used in this study for qRT-PCR are shown in Table S1. The levels of relative gene expression were performed by using the method of 2−ΔΔCt [75] and the ACTIN gene (Os03g0718100) was utilized as the internal reference.

4.14. Statistical Analysis

Three replicates were executed for molecular, physiological, and biochemical assays, and six replicates were conducted for the measurements of dry biomass, plant height, and root length. The experimental data values are shown as the means standard error (SE) based on replications. The statistical analyses were completed by following the students’ t-test. The means were compared by analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the significant differences between means of groups were performed using Bonferroni post-tests.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/10/1/23/s1, Figure S1: The predicted protein of mutant line is shown together with its WT one using the Clustal Omega Multiple Sequence Alignment (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/), Figure S2. Multiple sequence alignment of IPK1s, Figure S3. Relative expression level of phytic acid biosynthesis genes in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1, Table S1. Primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

M.J. and Q.S. designed the research. M.J., Y.L., R.L., S.L., and Y.T. conducted laboratory experiments. M.J. and Q.S. analyzed the data together. M.J. finished the first draft, which J.H., and Q.S. edited and converted into the final draft. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the Zhejiang Provincial S and T Project on Breeding of Agricultural (Food) Crops (2016C02050-2), National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0102103), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2020M680078), and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province (ZJ2020157).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article or supplementary material.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the staffs of Zhijiang Seed Tec. Ltd. (Hangzhou, China) for taking care of experimental fields. We also thank the assistance in total seed phosphorus element measurement of Wu Zhongchang from the College of Life Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lott, J.N.A.; Ockenden, I.; Raboy, V.; Batten, G.D. Phytic acid and phosphorus in crops seeds and fruits: A global estimate. Seed Sci. Res. 2000, 10, 11–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zhao, H.J.; Frank, T.; Tan, Y.Y.; Zhou, C.G.; Jabnoune, M.; Arpat, A.B.; Cui, H.R.; Huang, J.Z.; He, Z.H.; Poirier, Y.; et al. Disruption of OsSULTR3;3 reduces phytate and phosphorus concentrations and alters the metabolite profile in rice grains. New Phytol. 2016, 211, 926–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Raboy, V.; Gerbasi, P.F.; Young, K.A.; Stoneberg, S.D.; Pickett, S.G.; Bauman, A.T.; Murthy, P.P.N.; Sheridan, W.F.; Ertlet, D.S. Origin and seed phenotype of maize low phytic acid 1-1 and low phytic acid 2-1. Plant Physiol. 2000, 124, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Kuwano, M.; Ohyama, A.; Tanaka, Y.; Mimura, T.; Takaiwa, F.; Yoshida, K.T. Molecular breeding for transgenic rice with low phytic acid phenotype through manipulating myo inositol 3 phosphate synthase gene. Mol. Breed. 2006, 18, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Raboy, V. Approaches and challenges to engineering seed phytate and total phosphorus. Plant Sci. 2009, 177, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bohn, L.; Meyer, A.S.; Rasmussen, S.K. Phytate: Impact on environment and human nutrition, a challenge for molecular breeding. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2008, 9, 165–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Pilu, R.; Panzeri, D.; Gavazzi, G.; Rasmussen, S.K.; Consonni, G.; Nielsen, E. Phenotypic, genetic and molecular characterization of a maize low phytic acid mutant (lpa 241). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 107, 980–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guttieri, M.; Bowen, D.; Dorsch, J.A.; Raboy, V.; Souza, E. Identification and characterization of a low phytic acid wheat. Crop Sci. 2014, 44, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Larson, S.R.; Rutger, J.N.; Young, K.A.; Raboy, V. Isolation and genetic mapping of a non-lethal rice (Oryza sativa L.) low phytic acid 1 mutation. Crop Sci. 2000, 40, 1397–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Liu, Q.L.; Xu, X.H.; Ren, X.L.; Fu, H.W.; Wu, D.X.; Shu, Q.Y. Generation and characterization of low phytic acid germplasm in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 114, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kim, S.I.; Andaya, C.B.; Newman, J.W.; Goyal, S.S.; Tai, T.H. Isolation and characterization of a low phytic acid rice mutant reveals a mutation in the rice orthologue of maize MIK. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2008, 117, 1291–1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, W.X.; Huang, J.Z.; Zhao, H.J.; Tan, Y.Y.; Cui, H.R.; Poirier, Y.; Shu, Q.Y. Production of low phytic acid rice by hairpin RNA- and artificial microRNA-mediated silencing of OsMIK in seeds. Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 2014, 119, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, W.X.; Zhao, H.J.; Pang, W.Q.; Cui, H.R.; Poirier, Y.; Shu, Q.Y. Seed-specific silencing of OsMRP5 reduces seed phytic acid and weight in rice. Transgenic Res. 2014, 23, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Suzuki, M.; Tanaka, K.; Kuwano, M.; Yoshida, K.T. Expression pattern of inositol phosphate-related enzymes in rice (Oryza sativa L.): Implications for the phytic acid biosynthetic pathway. Gene 2007, 405, 55–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Stephens, L.R.; Irvine, R.F. Stepwise phosphorylation of myo-inositol leading to myo-inositol hexakisphosphate in Dictyostelium. Nature 1990, 346, 580–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brearley, C.A.; Hanke, D.E. Metabolic evidence for the order of addition of individual phosphate este rs to the myo-inositol moiety of inositol hexakisphosphate in the duckweed Spirodela polyrhiza L. Biochem. J. 1996, 314, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. York, J.D.; Odom, A.R.; Murphy, R.; Ives, E.B.; Wente, S.R. A phospholipase cdependent inositol polyphosphate kinase pathway required for efficient messenger RNA export. Science 1999, 285, 96–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Stevenson-Paulik, J.; Bastidas, R.J.; Chiou, S.-T.; Frye, R.A.; York, J.D. Generation of phytate-free seeds in Arabidopsis through disruption of inositol polyphosphate kinases. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 12612–12617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Ali, N.; Paul, S.; Gayen, D.; Sarkar, S.N.; Datta, K.; Datta, S.K. Development of low phytate rice by RNAi mediated seed specific seed specific silencing of inositol 1,3,4,5,6-pentakisphosphate 2-kinase gene (IPK1). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Yuan, F.J.; Zhao, H.J.; Ren, X.L.; Zhu, S.L.; Fu, X.J.; Shu, Q.Y. Generation and characterization of two novel low phytate mutations in soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2007, 115, 945–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yuan, F.J.; Zhu, D.H.; Tan, Y.Y.; Dong, D.K.; Fu, X.J.; Zhu, S.L.; Li, B.Q.; Shu, Q.Y. Identification and characterization of the soybean IPK1 ortholog of a low phytic acid mutant reveals an exon-excluding splice-site mutation. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 125, 1413–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xiong, L.; Lee, B.; Ishitani, M.; Lee, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhu, J.K. FIERY1 encoding an inositol polyphosphate 1-phosphatase is a negative regulator of abscisic acid and stress signaling in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2001, 15, 1971–1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. DeWald, D.B.; Torabinejad, J.; Jones, C.A.; Shope, J.C.; Cangelosi, A.R.; Thompson, J.E.; Prestwich, G.D.; Hama, H. Rapid accumulation of phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate and inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate correlates with calcium mobilization in salt stressed Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2001, 126, 759–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Lu, Y.; Ye, X.; Guo, R.; Huang, J.; Wang, W.; Tang, J.; Tan, L.; Zhu, J.K.; Chu, C.; Qian, Y. Genome-wide targeted mutagenesis in rice using the crispr/cas9 system. Mol. Plant 2017, 10, 1242–1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Jung, C.; Capistrano-Gossmann, G.; Braatz, J.; Sashidhar, N.; Melzer, S. Recent developments in genome editing and applications in plant breeding. Plant Breed. 2017, 137, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Jiang, M.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tan, Y.; Huang, J.; Shu, Q. Mutation of inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinase6 impairs plant growth and phytic acid synthesis in rice. Plants-Basel 2019, 8, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Stevenson, J.M.; Perera, I.Y.; Heilmann, I.I.; Persson, S.; Boss, W.F. Inositol signaling and plant growth. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ziolkowski, N.; Grover, A.K. Functional linkage as a direction for studies in oxidative stress: Alpha-adrenergic receptors. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2010, 88, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shi, J.; Wang, H.; Hazebroek, J.; Ertl, D.S.; Harp, T. The maize low-phytic acid 3 encodes a myo-inositol kinase that plays a role in phytic acid biosynthesis in developing seeds. Plant J. 2005, 42, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khodakovskaya, M.; Sword, C.; Wu, Q.; Perera, I.Y.; Boss, W.F.; Brown, C.S.; Sederoff, H.W. Increasing inositol (1, 4, 5)-trisphosphate metabolism affects drought tolerance, carbohydrate metabolism and phosphate-sensitive biomass increases in tomato. Plant Biotech. J. 2010, 8, 170–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yancey, P.H.; Clark, M.E.; Hand, S.C.; Bowlus, R.D.; Somero, G.N. Living with water stress: Evolution of osmolyte systems. Science 1982, 217, 1214–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Le Rudulier, D.; Strom, A.R.; Dandekar, A.M.; Smith, L.T.; Valentine, R.C. Molecular biology of osmoregulation. Science 1984, 224, 1064–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hong, Z.; Lakkineni, K.; Zhang, Z.; Verma, D.P. Removal of feedback inhibition of delta(1)-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase results in increased proline accumulation and protection of plants from osmotic stress. Plant Physiol. 2000, 122, 1129–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Graf, E.; Eaton, J.W. Antioxidant functions of phytic acid. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1990, 8, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Enrico, D.; Luciano, G.; Lucia, C.; Calogero, P.; Roberto, P.; Elena, C.; Erik, N. Phytic acid prevents oxidative stress in seeds: Evidence from a maize (Zea mays L.) low phytic acid mutant. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 3, 967–978. [Google Scholar]
  38. Du, H.; Liu, L.H.; You, L.; Yang, M.; He, Y.B.; Li, X.H.; Xiong, L.Z. Characterization of an inositol 1,3,4-trisphosphate 5/6-kinase gene that is essential for drought and salt stress responses in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2011, 77, 547–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Chittoor, J.M.; Leach, J.E.; White, F.F. Differential induction of a peroxidase gene family during infection of rice by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 1997, 10, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Hu, H.; You, J.; Fang, Y.; Zhu, X.; Qi, Z.; Xiong, L. Characterization of transcription factor gene SNAC2 conferring cold and salt tolerance in rice. Plant Mol. Biol. 2008, 67, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Dubouzet, J.G.; Sakuma, Y.; Ito, Y.; Kasuga, M.; Dubouzet, E.G.; Miura, S.; Seki, M.; Shinozaki, K.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L. encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J. 2003, 33, 751–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hu, H.; Dai, M.; Yao, J.; Xiao, B.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q.; Xiong, L. Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 12987–12992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Xiang, Y.; Tang, N.; Du, H.; Ye, H.; Xiong, L. Characterization of OsbZIP23 as a key player of the basic leucine zipper transcription factor family for conferring abscisic acid sensitivity and salinity and drought tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148, 1938–1952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Hou, X.; Xie, K.; Yao, J.; Qi, Z.; Xiong, L. A homolog of human skiinteracting protein in rice positively regulates cell viability and stress tolerance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 6410–6415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Wu, G.T.; Shu, Q.Y.; Xia, Y.W. The biological effects of Pingyangmycin on rice. J. Zhejiang Agric. Univ. 1997, 23, 65–69. [Google Scholar]
  46. Shu, Q.Y.; Cui, H.R.; Ye, G.Y.; Wu, D.X.; Xia, Y.W.; Gao, M.W.; Altosaar, I. Agronomic and morphological characterization of agrobacterium-transformed bt rice plants. Euphytica 2002, 127, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kaeppler, S.M.; Kaeppler, H.F.; Rhee, Y. Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 43, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lei, Y.; Lu, L.; Liu, H.Y.; Li, S.; Xing, F.; Chen, L.L. CRISPR-P: A web tool for synthetic single-guide RNA design of CRISPR-system in plants. Mol. Plant 2014, 7, 1494–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lu, H.P.; Liu, S.M.; Xu, S.L.; Chen, W.Y.; Zhou, X.; Tan, Y.Y.; Huang, J.Z.; Shu, Q.Y. CRISPR-S: An active interference element for a rapid and inexpensive selection of genome-edited, transgene-free rice plants. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2017, 15, 1371–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, R.F.; Li, H.; Qin, R.Y.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Wei, P.C.; Yang, J.B. Gene targeting using the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR-Cas system in rice. Rice 2014, 7, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Li, W.X.; Wu, S.L.; Liu, Y.H.; Jin, G.L.; Zhao, H.J.; Fan, L.J.; Shu, Q.Y. Genome-wide profiling of genetic variation in Agrobacterium-transformed rice plants. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2016, 17, 992–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Zhang, H.L.; Huang, J.Z.; Chen, X.Y.; Tan, Y.Y.; Shu, Q.Y. Competitive amplification of differentially melting amplicons facilitates efficient genotyping of photoperiod-and temperature-sensitive genic male sterility in rice. Mol. Breed. 2014, 34, 1765–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, W.L.; Xu, B.B.; Song, Q.J.; Liu, X.M.; Xu, J.M.; Brookes, P.C. The identification of ‘hotspots’ of heavy metal pollution in soil-rice systems at a regional scale in eastern China. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 472, 407–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Li, S.; Liu, S.M.; Liu, Y.H.; Lu, H.P.; Tan, Y.Y.; Huang, J.Z.; Wei, P.C.; Shu, Q.Y. HRM-facilitated rapid identification and genotyping of mutations induced by CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis in rice. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 2018, 18, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Liu, W.Z.; Xie, X.R.; Ma, X.L.; Li, J.; Chen, J.H.; Liu, Y.G. DSDecode: Aweb-based tool for decoding of sequencing chromatograms for genotyping of targeted mutations. Mol. Plant 2015, 8, 1431–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Chen, P.S.; Toribara, T.Y.; Warner, H. Micro determination of phosphorous. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 1756–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wilcox, J.R.; Premachandra, G.S.; Young, K.A.; Raboy, V. Isolation of high seed inorganic P, low-phytate soybean mutants. Crop Sci. 2000, 40, 1601–1605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Raboy, V.; Young, K.A.; Dorsch, J.A.; Cook, A. Genetics and breeding of seed phosphorus and phytic acid. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 158, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. McKie, V.A.; McCleary, B.V.A. Novel and rapid colorimetric method for measuring total phosphorus and phytic acid in foods and animal feeds. J. AOAC Int. 2016, 99, 738–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Hu, L.F.; McBride, M.B.; Cheng, H.; Wu, J.J.; Shi, J.C.; Xu, J.M.; Wu, L.S. Root-induced changes to cadmium speciation in the rhizosphere of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Environ. Res. 2011, 111, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Meng, J.; Zhong, L.B.; Wang, L.; Liu, X.M.; Tang, C.X.; Chen, H.L.; Xu, J.M. Contrasting effects of alkaline amendments on the bioavailability and uptake of Cd in rice plants in a Cd-contaminated acid paddy soil. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2018, 25, 8827–8835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Murashige, T.; Skoog, F. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plantarum 1962, 15, 473–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Campion, B.; Sparvoli, F.; Doria, E.; Tagliabue, G.; Galasso, I.; Fileppi, M.; Bollini, R.; Nielsen, E. Isolation and characterization of an lpa (low phytic acid) mutant in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2009, 118, 1211–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Jiang, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Zheng, Y.; Fu, H.; Tan, Y.; Moller, I.M.; Fan, L.; Shu, Q.; Huang, J. A suppressor mutation partially reverts the xantha trait via lowered methylation in the promoter of genomes uncoupled 4 in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Miller, G.A.; Youngs, V.L.; Oplinger, E.S. Environmental and cultivar effects on oat phytic acid concentration. Cereal Chem. 1980, 57, 189–191. [Google Scholar]
  66. Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Wen, F.; Yao, D.; Wang, L.; Guo, J.; Nan, L.; Zhang, A.; Tana, M.; Jiang, M. A novel rice C2H2-type zinc finger protein, ZFP36, is a key player involved in abscisic acid-induced antioxidant defence and oxidative stress tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 5795–5809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Jiang, M.; Jiang, J.; Li, S.; Li, M.; Tan, Y.Y.; Song, S.Y.; Shu, Q.Y.; Huang, J.Z. Glutamate alleviates cadmium toxicity in rice via suppressing cadmium uptake and translocation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 384, 121319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Tang, L.; Cai, H.; Ji, W.; Luo, X.; Wang, Z.; Wu, J.; Wang, X.; Cui, L.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; et al. Overexpression of GsZFP1 enhances salt and drought tolerance in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2013, 71, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. He, J.; Duan, Y.; Hua, D.; Fan, G.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Han, L.; Qu, L.J.; Gong, Z. DEXH Box RNA Helicase-mediated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production in Arabidopsis mediates crosstalk between abscisic acid and auxin signaling. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 1815–1833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Aebi, H. Catalase in vitro. Method Enzymol. 1984, 105, 121–126. [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhang, W.; Zhang, F.; Raziuddin, R.; Gong, H.; Yang, Z.; Lu, L.; Ye, Q.; Zhou, W. Effects of 5-aminolevulinic acid on oilseed rape seedling growth under herbicide toxicity stress. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2008, 27, 159–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hossain, M.A.; Hasanuzzaman, M.; Fujita, M. Up-regulation of antioxidant and glyoxalase systems by exogenous glycinebetaine and proline in mung bean confer tolerance to cadmium stress. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 2010, 16, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Jiang, M.; Wang, J.X.; Rui, M.M.; Yang, L.J.; Shen, J.; Chu, H.W.; Song, S.Y.; Chen, Y. OsFTIP7 determines metallic oxide nanoparticles response and tolerance by regulating auxin biosynthesis in rice. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 403, 123946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Jiang, M.; Wu, X.J.; Song, Y.; Shen, H.Z.; Cui, H.R. Effects of OsMSH6 mutations on microsatellite stability and homeologous recombination in rice. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta c (t)) method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Plants 10 00023 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of OsIPK1 and the sgRNA target site for its clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas9)-mediated mutagenesis (A), and prediction of IPK1 proteins in Xidao #1 (WT) and its osipk1 mutants (B). Exons, introns and untranslated regions (UTRs) are indicated by solid boxes, lines and blank boxes, respectively. P1-F and P1-R are primers for genotyping osipk1 mutations, with their position indicated by arrowheads. The protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences (NGG) are boxed and the 20-nt target sequences are underlined. ‘–’ indicates deletion of nucleotide. The 3-dimensional structures of WT and mutant osipk1 were analyzed on SWISS-MODEL (https://www.swissmodel.expasy.org/).
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of OsIPK1 and the sgRNA target site for its clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas9)-mediated mutagenesis (A), and prediction of IPK1 proteins in Xidao #1 (WT) and its osipk1 mutants (B). Exons, introns and untranslated regions (UTRs) are indicated by solid boxes, lines and blank boxes, respectively. P1-F and P1-R are primers for genotyping osipk1 mutations, with their position indicated by arrowheads. The protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences (NGG) are boxed and the 20-nt target sequences are underlined. ‘–’ indicates deletion of nucleotide. The 3-dimensional structures of WT and mutant osipk1 were analyzed on SWISS-MODEL (https://www.swissmodel.expasy.org/).
Plants 10 00023 g001
Plants 10 00023 g002 550
Figure 2. Agronomic traits (A–E) and seed germination rate (F) of Xidao #1 (wild type, WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. Twenty single plants were investigated for WT and osipk1_1. Error bars represent standard error. (F) The germination rate was recorded from 1 to 7 days after soaking, and three replicates in each group.
Figure 2. Agronomic traits (A–E) and seed germination rate (F) of Xidao #1 (wild type, WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. Twenty single plants were investigated for WT and osipk1_1. Error bars represent standard error. (F) The germination rate was recorded from 1 to 7 days after soaking, and three replicates in each group.
Plants 10 00023 g002
Plants 10 00023 g003 550
Figure 3. Inorganic P (Pi), phytic acid P (PA-P), and total phosphorus (TP) contents in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. (A) Qualitative assay of inorganic phosphorus (Pi) in mutant seeds. The concentration of the Pi standard samples were shown above. Five replicates were performed for WT and osipk1_1. (B–D) Three replicates were performed for WT and osipk1_1. Error bars represent standard error. Data with an asterisk(s) are significantly different from WT (* p < 0.05).
Figure 3. Inorganic P (Pi), phytic acid P (PA-P), and total phosphorus (TP) contents in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. (A) Qualitative assay of inorganic phosphorus (Pi) in mutant seeds. The concentration of the Pi standard samples were shown above. Five replicates were performed for WT and osipk1_1. (B–D) Three replicates were performed for WT and osipk1_1. Error bars represent standard error. Data with an asterisk(s) are significantly different from WT (* p < 0.05).
Plants 10 00023 g003
Plants 10 00023 g004 550
Figure 4. The phenotype of Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1 under salt stress (100 mM NaCl) and drought stress (20 mM mannitol). (A) The picture was taken in the 7th day after treatment. Bar = 5 cm. (B–D) Six replicates were performed for WT and osipk1_1. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters (a, b, c, and d) show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05.
Figure 4. The phenotype of Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1 under salt stress (100 mM NaCl) and drought stress (20 mM mannitol). (A) The picture was taken in the 7th day after treatment. Bar = 5 cm. (B–D) Six replicates were performed for WT and osipk1_1. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters (a, b, c, and d) show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05.
Plants 10 00023 g004
Plants 10 00023 g005 550
Figure 5. Accumulation of inositol triphosphate (IP3, A) and phytic acid P (IP6, B) in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. All analyses were performed with three replicates. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters (a, b, c, d, and e) show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05.
Figure 5. Accumulation of inositol triphosphate (IP3, A) and phytic acid P (IP6, B) in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. All analyses were performed with three replicates. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters (a, b, c, d, and e) show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05.
Plants 10 00023 g005
Plants 10 00023 g006 550
Figure 6. Levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, A), malondialdehyde (MDA, B), and proline (Pro, C) in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. All analyses were performed with three replicates. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters (a, b, c, and d) show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05.
Figure 6. Levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, A), malondialdehyde (MDA, B), and proline (Pro, C) in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. All analyses were performed with three replicates. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters (a, b, c, and d) show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05.
Plants 10 00023 g006
Plants 10 00023 g007 550
Figure 7. Activity of catalase (CAT) (A), peroxidase (POD) (B) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (C) in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. All analyses were performed with three replicates. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters (a, b, c, d, and e) show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05.
Figure 7. Activity of catalase (CAT) (A), peroxidase (POD) (B) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) (C) in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. All analyses were performed with three replicates. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters (a, b, c, d, and e) show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05.
Plants 10 00023 g007
Plants 10 00023 g008 550
Figure 8. Relative expression level of stress related genes in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. All analyses were performed with three replicates. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05. The stress related genes encode various proteins including two peroxidase genes OsPOX8.1 and OsPOX22.3, proline synthesis protein OsP5CS, rab16 family protein OsRab16D, osmolytes metabolism enzyme OsGDSL, bZIP transcription factors OsbZIP23, NAC (NAM/ATAF/CUC) transcription factor OsSNAC1 and dehydration responsive element-binding protein OsDREB1A.
Figure 8. Relative expression level of stress related genes in Xidao #1 (WT) and its OsIPK1 mutant line osipk1_1. All analyses were performed with three replicates. Error bars represent standard error. The different letters show the significant difference at a probability of p ˂ 0.05. The stress related genes encode various proteins including two peroxidase genes OsPOX8.1 and OsPOX22.3, proline synthesis protein OsP5CS, rab16 family protein OsRab16D, osmolytes metabolism enzyme OsGDSL, bZIP transcription factors OsbZIP23, NAC (NAM/ATAF/CUC) transcription factor OsSNAC1 and dehydration responsive element-binding protein OsDREB1A.
Plants 10 00023 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, M.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Li, S.; Tan, Y.; Huang, J.; Shu, Q. An Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-Pentakisphosphate 2-Kinase 1 Mutant with a 33-nt Deletion Showed Enhanced Tolerance to Salt and Drought Stress in Rice. Plants 2021, 10, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010023

AMA Style

Jiang M, Liu Y, Li R, Li S, Tan Y, Huang J, Shu Q. An Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-Pentakisphosphate 2-Kinase 1 Mutant with a 33-nt Deletion Showed Enhanced Tolerance to Salt and Drought Stress in Rice. Plants. 2021; 10(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Meng, Yanhua Liu, Ruiqing Li, Shan Li, Yuanyuan Tan, Jianzhong Huang, and Qingyao Shu. 2021. "An Inositol 1,3,4,5,6-Pentakisphosphate 2-Kinase 1 Mutant with a 33-nt Deletion Showed Enhanced Tolerance to Salt and Drought Stress in Rice" Plants 10, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop