Next Article in Journal
A Measure of the Non-Determinacy of a Dynamic Neighborhood Model
Previous Article in Journal
On Using Ilities of Non-Functional Properties for Subsystems and Components
Article

Packageability as an ‘Ility’ for Systems Engineering

1
Department of Engineering and Computer Science, Azusa Pacific University, 901 E Alosta Ave, Azusa, CA 91702, USA
2
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2017, 5(4), 48; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5040048
Received: 30 June 2017 / Revised: 7 August 2017 / Accepted: 19 September 2017 / Published: 23 September 2017
The usefulness of packageability as one of the ‘ilities’ for systems engineering was investigated. It was found that packageability plays an important role in a multitude of systems, and it was investigated in several ways. First, a brief analysis showed that at least two criteria must be met for something to be considered an ility. These criteria are that the ility often manifests itself after the system is deployed, and that the potential ility must not simply be a persistent physical characteristic. It was shown that packageability meets both requirements. Second, six different systems were examined, revealing nine general ways packageability is used. They provide a way for system engineers to recognize packageability as a non-functional system property. The usefulness of packageability as a top-level non-functional system property is shown, as well as for sub-systems and components. A working definition of packageability is then proposed. Finally, a detailed treatment of packageability is presented for radar systems with transmit–receive modules. Packageability was shown to be a useful ility category that can add value to stakeholders, and that captures real system features that are not captured by other ilities. This work demonstrates that packageability should be considered as an ility for systems engineers. View Full-Text
Keywords: systems engineering and theory; system implementation; system lifecycle management; system-level design; systems design systems engineering and theory; system implementation; system lifecycle management; system-level design; systems design
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sturdivant, R.L.; Chong, E.K.P. Packageability as an ‘Ility’ for Systems Engineering. Systems 2017, 5, 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5040048

AMA Style

Sturdivant RL, Chong EKP. Packageability as an ‘Ility’ for Systems Engineering. Systems. 2017; 5(4):48. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5040048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sturdivant, Rick L., and Edwin K.P. Chong 2017. "Packageability as an ‘Ility’ for Systems Engineering" Systems 5, no. 4: 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems5040048

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop