Next Article in Journal
AI Product Factors and Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Integrated Model with Hybrid Analytical Approaches
Previous Article in Journal
A Two-Layer Causal Knowledge Network Construction Method Based on Quality Problem-Solving Data
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Conceptual Modeling for Understanding and Communicating Complexity During Human Systems Integration in Manned–Unmanned Systems: A Case Study

by
Tommy Langen
*,
Kristin Falk
and
Gerrit Muller
Department of Science and Industry Systems, University of South-Eastern Norway, 3616 Kongsberg, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2025, 13(3), 143; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030143
Submission received: 29 December 2024 / Revised: 28 January 2025 / Accepted: 19 February 2025 / Published: 21 February 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Architectural Complexity of Systems Engineering)

Abstract

Informal soft system methodologies hold a significant role in developing complex systems. They bridge system knowledge and sensemaking among heterogeneous stakeholders. This article investigates the application of conceptual models to support such communication and understanding among transdisciplinary stakeholders, ensuring the translation of customer requirements and needs into suitable engineered systems. This article presents a case study incorporating observations, interviews, and a review of conceptual models utilized by an aerospace and defense case company for the development of future Manned–Unmanned Systems. It explores how practitioners employ conceptual modeling to support the Human Systems Integration (HSI) aspects of technological, organizational, and human elements of Manned–Unmanned Teaming (MUM-T) systems. The results indicate that practitioners utilize a mix of informal and formal types of conceptual models when developing Human Systems Integration aspects of the system. Formal models, such as sequence diagrams, requirement overviews, and functional flow models, are applied when addressing technology-focused aspects. Organization-centered modeling leverages representations like stakeholder maps and swimlane diagrams, while people-centered aspects rely more on informal techniques such as storytelling and user personas. The findings suggest a potential underestimation by practitioners of the value of quantification in conceptual modeling for Manned–Unmanned Systems development. This study highlights the important role that conceptual modeling methods play, particularly focusing on the informal aspects. These methods are instrumental in enhancing effective communication and understanding among transdisciplinary stakeholders. Furthermore, they facilitate mutual understanding, which is essential for fostering collaboration and shared vision in the development of complex systems. This facilitates deeper insights and reasoning into HSI for MUM-T applications.
Keywords: conceptual model; lightweight modeling; systems architecture; human systems integration; manned–unmanned teaming conceptual model; lightweight modeling; systems architecture; human systems integration; manned–unmanned teaming

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Langen, T.; Falk, K.; Muller, G. Conceptual Modeling for Understanding and Communicating Complexity During Human Systems Integration in Manned–Unmanned Systems: A Case Study. Systems 2025, 13, 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030143

AMA Style

Langen T, Falk K, Muller G. Conceptual Modeling for Understanding and Communicating Complexity During Human Systems Integration in Manned–Unmanned Systems: A Case Study. Systems. 2025; 13(3):143. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030143

Chicago/Turabian Style

Langen, Tommy, Kristin Falk, and Gerrit Muller. 2025. "Conceptual Modeling for Understanding and Communicating Complexity During Human Systems Integration in Manned–Unmanned Systems: A Case Study" Systems 13, no. 3: 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030143

APA Style

Langen, T., Falk, K., & Muller, G. (2025). Conceptual Modeling for Understanding and Communicating Complexity During Human Systems Integration in Manned–Unmanned Systems: A Case Study. Systems, 13(3), 143. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13030143

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop