Next Article in Journal
On the Notion of Digital Twins: A Modeling Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
SEDIS—A Rumor Propagation Model for Social Networks by Incorporating the Human Nature of Selection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Compact Filtering Coupler with Unwanted Harmonic Rejection Using LC Composite Lines for Communication Systems Applications

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Kermanshah Branch, Islamic Azad University, Kermanshah 67146, Iran
2
Department of Communication and Computer Engineering, Cihan University-Erbil, Erbil 44001, Iraq
3
Department of Software Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Koya University, Koya KOY45, Iraq
4
Medical Instrumentation Engineering Department, Al-Esraa University College, Baghdad 10071, Iraq
5
College of Engineering and Information Technology, Ajman University, Ajman P.O. Box 346, United Arab Emirates
6
College of Medical Techniques, Al-Farahidi University, Baghdad PXW+7995, Iraq
7
Software Engineering and Computer Science Department, Al Ain University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Systems 2023, 11(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010014
Submission received: 2 December 2022 / Revised: 22 December 2022 / Accepted: 27 December 2022 / Published: 29 December 2022

Abstract

:
In this paper, new LC lumped components and composite lines are used to create a filtering branch line coupler (FBLC) with a small size and wide suppression band. New composite lines are proposed using applied LC lumped components, which are used as the coupler main branches. The proposed FBLC suppresses second to sixth harmonics with high attention level and provides a wide stopband from 1.6 GHz to 5 GHz with more than 20 dB of attention. The presented coupler is analyzed, designed, simulated, and implemented. The measured results show that the proposed FBLC correctly operates at 800 MHz with less than 0.25 dB of insertion loss. In addition, more than 29 dB of return loss and isolation is measured at operating frequency, which shows the correct performance of the proposed design. The size of the proposed FBLC is equal to 23.7 mm × 25.5 mm (0.086λ × 0.093λ), which shows an 87% size reduction. The proposed FBLC with the designed frequency can be used in the communication systems for narrow-band Internet of things (NB-IoT) and traffic control radar applications.

1. Introduction

The branch line couplers (BLCs) are widely used components in microwave and RF circuits, which have different types such as branch line, hybrid, and rat race. The coupler devices are commonly being used in balanced power amplifiers [1], Doherty power amplifiers [2,3], array antennas [4,5], and phase shifters [6]. Conventional BLCs are composed of four λ/4 transmission lines (TLs), which occupy a large area. Moreover, another disadvantage of the conventional couplers is that there is no suppression band in these devices, which cannot suppress the undesirable signals at unwanted frequencies. Several approaches have been presented to improve the performance and solve the conventional coupler disadvantages, which are explained in what follows.
A dual-band coupler is designed with coupled lines in [7], operating at 1.8 GHz and 0.9 GHz; however, the designed coupler has a large size. In [8], a differential coupler using a coupled line structure is designed with long parallel coupled lines. High insertion loss and rather large size are disadvantages in the designed coupler in [8].
Resonators, which can improve the performance of the electronic components [9], are widely used to provide a wide suppression band for the microwave devices, such as couplers [10], filters [11,12], and diplexers [13]. FBLC is designed using resonators in [14] and meandered lines to decrease the area and increase the performance of the device. According to the results in [14], the meandered lines have reduced the length of the coupler’s main branches; moreover, the applied resonators and open stubs have created transmission zeros to provide a suppression band for the coupler. A rat-race coupler (RRC) is designed in [15], in which capacitive open stubs and T-shaped resonators are incorporated to present an RRC with reduced size and high performance. The E-shaped impedance transformer is used in [16] to design a dual-band coupler with high frequency ratio. Open stubs are also used in [16] to create desired transmission zeros. In [17], capacitive open stubs are applied in the BLC structure to achieve compact size, but the obtained insertion loss is high. Open stubs and resonators can be used together in the BLC structure to obtain high performances of the device [18].
The electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) has also been used in the design of the microwave devices, such as couplers to reduce the size or to improve the functionality of the devices. However, the EBG method increases the design and fabrication complexity. Substrate-integrated gap waveguide (SIGW) and EBG methods are used for designing of a wideband coupler in [19]; however, the obtained coupler has a large size. Couplers are also designed using a photonic crystal for higher frequencies [20,21,22,23,24,25].
Recently, artificial neural network (ANN) techniques and optimization algorithms [26,27] have helped electronics designers to improve the performances of their devices [28,29,30,31,32], which also have been used in the designing of the couplers [33,34,35]. In [33], a feedforward network was used to predict the BLC transfer function. By using the transfer function, the locations of the transmission zeros can be obtained, which help to design the coupler with desired specifications. In [36], a neural network and the back propagation method with Bayesian regularization are used to improve the filters’ performance. In addition, a feedforward ANN is used in [37] to design a power divider with reduced size. A combination of ANNs and optimization algorithms is also used together to present a design method for amplifier design in [38].
Recently, lumped elements have been used in coupler designs for achieving a miniaturized size or filtering response [39]. Capacitors are used in [40] to create a compact coupler with suppression of harmonics; however, the obtained operating band is very narrow, which may be because of frequency shifting in the fabrication. In addition, varactor diodes can be used in the coupler structure, which can provide tunable and reconfigurable performance of the coupler [41]. Capacitors and inductors are used in the coupler structure designed in [42], but the obtained insertion losses in the output ports are high.
In this paper, lumped components, four capacitors, and four inductors are used with transmission lines to create composite lines to design a branch line coupler, which has resulted in improvement of coupler performances, such as miniaturized size and wide suppression band. The achieved suppression band of the device has helped to attenuate the unwanted frequencies, such as undesired harmonics.

2. Design Process

In this section, the design process of the typical and proposed couplers is explained as follows.

2.1. Typical 800 MHz Coupler

The structure of the typical 0.8 GHz FBLC is shown in Figure 1, which consists of four λ/4 branches. With the applied RT-Duroid 5880 substrate (εr = 2.2 and 20 mil thickness), the size of the typical coupler is 71.1 mm × 69.8 mm. Large occupied size is the first drawback of this coupler.
The typical 800 MHz FBLC frequency response is depicted in Figure 2. The amplitudes of S12 and S13 are −3.1 dB and −3.2 dB, which shows less than 0.2 dB insertion loss at operating frequency. The amplitude of S11 is about −32 dB, and the amplitude of S14 is about −36 dB, which shows good performance of the typical coupler at operating frequency. A typical FBLC has good performance at operating frequency, but the performance of this coupler at higher frequency is not acceptable, and undesirable signals are passed, without any suppression at higher frequencies, which is another drawback of the typical FBLC.

2.2. Proposed Coupler

As mentioned in the previous section, the typical FBLC has two main drawbacks. Firstly, it has a large size, and secondly it passes undesirable signals at higher frequencies such as the main signal without any suppression. In order to overcome these drawbacks, a proposed structure is presented in Figure 3, in which four lumped inductors and four capacitors are used.

3. Proposed FBLC Analysis

In the conventional coupler, four long branches are used, which occupies large area, so the length reduction of these branches is an important parameter to miniaturize the device [43]. In the proposed FBLC, two types of composite lines are used instead of two long conventional branches. In Figure 4a, the conventional horizontal branch is depicted, which has 90 degrees of length and has 35.5 ohms of impedance. In the proposed coupler, a new horizontal composite branch is proposed as depicted in Figure 4b, which is applied instead of the long conventional branch. These two lines must have the same performance at an operating frequency of 800 MHz. As mentioned, the proposed branches not only reduce the size of the device but also improve the performance of the frequency response. The scattering parameters of the conventional horizontal λ/4 line and the proposed compact horizontal TL are compared in Figure 4c. As seen, both lines have the same insertion loss of 0.05 dB at the 0.8 GHz operating frequency. The proposed horizontal transmission line provides a wide suppression band, while the conventional TL does not provide any harmonics suppression.
The ABCD parameters for the conventional and the proposed horizontal branches should be equated as written in Equation (1):
M _ A B C D _ C × M _ A B C D _ T L × M _ A B C D _ L × M _ A B C D _ T L × M _ A B C D _ C = M _ A B C D _ B R
wherein (1) M_ABCD_C is the ABCD matrix of the capacitor. Moreover, M_ABCD_TL, M_ABCD_L, and M_ABCD_BR are ABCD matrices of the transmission line, inductor, and conventional 90-degree branch line, respectively. The ABCD matrices are defined in Equations (2)–(5) as follows [44]:
M _ A B C D _ C = 1 0 C ω i 2 1
M _ A B C D _ T L = cos θ 1 Z 1 sin θ 1 i sin θ 1 i Z 1 cos θ 1
M _ A B C D _ L = 1 L ω i 0 1
where ω = 2πf. After simplifying Equations (1)–(4), the final equation can be calculated as written in Equation (5):
cos θ 1 2 + C ω σ 1 i 2 + sin θ 1 Z 1 sin θ 1 i + L ω cos θ 1 i i Z 1 σ 1 cos θ 1 σ 4 + sin θ 1 σ 3 i Z 1 + C ω σ 2 i 2 σ 2 = 0 j Z B R j Y B R 0
where the values of σ1–σ4 are defined in Equations (6)–(9) as the following:
σ 1 = cos θ 1 Z 1 sin θ 1 i + L ω cos θ 1 i + Z 1 cos θ 1 sin θ 1 i
σ 2 = cos θ 1 σ 3 + Z 1 sin θ 1 σ 4 i
σ 3 = cos θ 1 C Z 1 ω sin θ 1 2 + L w σ 4 i
σ 4 = sin θ 1 i Z 1 + C ω cos θ 1 i 2
Equation (5) has an infinite number of solutions. Therefore, some assumptions should be considered for calculating this equation. The values of capacitors (C) and inductors (L) are considered as written in Table 1. Moreover, the values of Z1 and θ1 are calculated based on Equation (5) and the desired size reduction. The value of applied stubs and lumped elements components is listed in the Table 1.
In Figure 5a, the conventional vertical branch is depicted, which has 90 degrees of length and has 50 ohms of impedance. In the proposed coupler, a new vertical composite branch is proposed as depicted in Figure 5b, which is applied instead of the long conventional branch. These two lines must have the same performance at an operating frequency of 800 MHz. The scattering parameters of the conventional vertical λ/4 line and the proposed compact vertical TL are compared in Figure 5c. As seen, both lines have the same values of insertion loss of 0.05 dB at the 0.8 GHz operating frequency. Moreover, the proposed vertical transmission line provides a wide suppression band, while conventional TL cannot provide any harmonics suppression.
Similar to the horizontal analyses, the ABCD parameters for the conventional and the proposed vertical branches should be equated using Equations (1)–(9). The values of Z2 and θ2 are calculated as listed in Table 1.

4. Simulations

In the design of the proposed FBLC, Duroid 5880 substrate is applied. The layout of the proposed FBLC is illustrated in Figure 6. The proposed FBLC only occupied 23.7 mm × 25.5 mm (0.086λ × 0.093λ), which shows 87% size reduction compared with the conventional coupler. As seen from Figure 6, Z1 and θ1, which correspond to the horizontal branches of the coupler, are shown in the coupler layout. Moreover, Z2 and θ2, which correspond to the vertical branches of the coupler, are indicated in the coupler layout. The values of the Z1, θ1, Z2, and θ2 are calculated based on the extracted analyses of the coupler, which are explained in Section 3, and the obtained values are listed in Table 1. By using the obtained values for Z1, θ1, Z2, and θ2, the microstrip realization of these transmission lines and also the layout of the proposed coupler can be extracted as shown in Figure 6. The simulation’s result of the proposed FBLC is illustrated in Figure 7. The proposed FBLC has good performance at the operating frequency and higher frequency bands. The amplitudes of S12 and S13 are −3.05 dB and −3.01 dB, which shows less than 0.05 dB of insertion loss at the operating frequency in simulation. The amplitude of S11 is about −23 dB, and the amplitude of S14 is about −41 dB, which shows desirable performance for the simulated proposed FBLC. At higher frequencies, the proposed coupler suppresses second to sixth harmonics with a high attention level and provides a wide rejection band from 1.6 GHz to 5 GHz with more than 20 dB of attention.
The effects of capacitors and the inductors’ result in the presented LC branches of the designed 0.8 GHz FBLC are shown in Figure 8. As seen, by tuning the values of capacitors and inductors in the presented LC branches, the operating frequency and the operating bandwidth can be adjusted.
The output ports’ phase difference of the presented FBLC is depicted in Figure 9. As seen, the output ports’ phase difference of the designed coupler is equal to −270.12°, at the operating frequency of 800 MHz, which is so close to the ideal value.

5. Fabrication

The proposed FBLC was measured and fabricated, which is depicted in Figure 10. As seen in the fabricated device, four capacitors and four inductors are soldered on the layout. The fabricated device has a small size of 23.7 mm × 25.5 mm (0.086λ × 0.093λ), which shows 87% size reduction compared with the conventional coupler.
The measured result of the presented FBLC is illustrated in Figure 11. The proposed FBLC has good performance at both operating frequency and higher frequency bands. The measured amplitudes of S12 and S13 are −3.1 dB and −3.25 dB, which shows less than 0.25 dB of insertion loss at operating frequency. The measured amplitude of S11 is about −29 dB, and the amplitude of S14 is about −28 dB, which shows desirable performance for the fabricated proposed FBLC. At higher frequencies, the proposed coupler suppresses second to sixth harmonics with high attention level and provides a wide stopband from 1.6 GHz to 5 GHz with more than 20 dB of attention.
In order to show the superiority of the proposed coupler’s achieved parameters, the performances of the proposed coupler are compared with some related couplers, listed in Table 2. As shown, the proposed branches, which are used in the designed coupler, have resulted in the desired performance, compared with the other related works. Moreover, the wide rejection band and high miniaturization are achieved for the proposed coupler, while the desirable parameters of the coupler at operating frequency are obtained.

6. Conclusions

A compact FBLC with a wide suppression band is presented in this paper. In the conventional FBLC, four long, quarter wavelength branches are used, which occupy a large area. In the proposed design, lumped components and transmissions lines are used together to create new compact composite lines. The proposed composite lines are used instead of the long branches in the FBLC structure. The proposed FBLC correctly operates at 800 MHZ and rejects second to sixth harmonics with a high attention level. Moreover, the designed FBLC provides a wide stopband from 1.6 GHz to 5 GHz with more than 20 dB of attention. In the designed coupler, four inductors and four capacitors are used, which in addition to harmonics suppression also reduce the size of the device. The proposed FBLC has a size of 23.7 mm × 25.5 mm (0.086λ × 0.093λ), which shows an 87% size reduction compared with the conventional coupler. The proposed coupler is implemented on Rogers RT-Duroid substrate, and the measured result validates the correct performance of the coupler.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.R. (Sobhan Roshani), S.I.Y., S.R. (Saeed Roshani) and M.K.; methodology, Y.Y.G., Y.S.M., A.A.A.-H. and S.R. (Saeed Roshani); software, M.A.C., M.K. and S.R. (Saeed Roshani); validation, M.K. and Y.Y.G.; formal analysis, S.I.Y. and S.R. (Saeed Roshani); investigation, S.R. (Saeed Roshani); resources, S.R. (Sobhan Roshani); writing—original draft preparation, S.R.(Sobhan Roshani) and S.R. (Saeed Roshani); writing—review and editing, A.A.A.-H., M.K., M.A.C., Y.Y.G., Y.S.M. and S.I.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All the material conducted in the study is mentioned in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Pednekar, P.H.; Hallberg, W.; Fager, C.; Barton, T.W. Analysis and design of a Doherty-like RF-input load modulated balanced amplifier. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2018, 66, 5322–5335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nikandish, G.; Staszewski, R.B.; Zhu, A. Breaking the bandwidth limit: A review of broadband Doherty power amplifier design for 5G. IEEE Microw. Mag. 2020, 21, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Faten, A.C. Optical design of dilute nitride quantum wells vertical cavity semiconductor optical amplifiers for communication systems. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2016, 4, 8–12. [Google Scholar]
  4. Koziel, S.; Bekasiewicz, A. Fast surrogate-assisted frequency scaling of planar antennas with circular polarisation. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2019, 13, 602–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yahya, S.I. Anticipated Impact of In-Car Mobile Calls on the Electromagnetic Interaction of Handset Antenna and Human. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2014, 2, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  6. Venter, J.J.; Stander, T.; Ferrari, P. $ X $-Band Reflection-Type Phase Shifters Using Coupled-Line Couplers on Single-Layer RF PCB. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2018, 28, 807–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, X.; Yin, W.-Y.; Wu, K.-L. A dual-band coupled-line coupler with an arbitrary coupling coefficient. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2012, 60, 945–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Martel, J.; Fernández-Prieto, A.; del Río, J.L.M.; Martín, F.; Medina, F. Design of a differential coupled-line directional coupler using a double-side coplanar waveguide structure with common-signal suppression. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2020, 69, 1273–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Parandin, F.; Sheykhian, A.; Bagheri, N. A Novel Design for an Ultracompact Optical Majority Gate Based on Ring Resonator on Photonic Crystals Substrate. J. Comput. Electron. 2022; under review. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hosseini, S.M.; Rezaei, A. Design of a Branch-line Microstrip Coupler Using Spirals and Step Impedance Cells for WiMAX Applications. Aro-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2020, 8, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rezaei, A.; Yahya, S.I. High-performance ultra-compact dual-band bandpass filter for global system for mobile communication-850/global system for mobile communication-1900 applications. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2019, 7, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yahya, S.I.; Rezaei, A.; Khaleel, Y.A. Design and Analysis of a Wide Stopband Microstrip Dual-band Bandpass Filter. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2021, 9, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yahya, S.I.; Rezaei, A. An Area-efficient Microstrip Diplexer with a Novel Structure and Low Group Delay for Microwave Wireless Applications. ARO-Sci. J. Koya Univ. 2020, 8, 71–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hosseinkhani, F.; Roshani, S. A compact branch-line coupler design using low-pass resonators and meandered lines open stubs. Turk. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2018, 26, 1164–1170. [Google Scholar]
  15. Lalbakhsh, A.; Mohamadpour, G.; Roshani, S.; Ami, M.; Roshani, S.; Sayem, A.S.M.; Alibakhshikenari, M.; Koziel, S. Design of a compact planar transmission line for miniaturized rat-race coupler with harmonics suppression. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 129207–129217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xia, L.; Li, J.-L.; Twumasi, B.A.; Liu, P.; Gao, S.-S. Planar dual-band branch-line coupler with large frequency ratio. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 33188–33195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jung, S.-C.; Negra, R.; Ghannouchi, F.M. A design methodology for miniaturized 3-dB branch-line hybrid couplers using distributed capacitors printed in the inner area. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2008, 56, 2950–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Jamshidi, M.B.; Roshani, S.; Talla, J.; Mohammadi, M.S.; Roshani, S.; Peroutka, Z. A Modified Branch Line Coupler with Ultra-Wide Harmonics Rejection Using Resonators and Open-Ended Stubs. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 12th Annual Ubiquitous Computing, Electronics & Mobile Communication Conference (UEMCON), New York, NY, USA, 1–4 December 2021; pp. 0860–0865. [Google Scholar]
  19. Shen, D.; Wang, K.; Zhang, X. A substrate integrated gap waveguide based wideband 3-dB coupler for 5G applications. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 66798–66806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Askarian, A.; Parandin, F. A novel proposal for all optical 1-bit comparator based on 2D linear photonic crystal. J. Comput. Electron. 2022, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lalbakhsh, A.; Parandin, F.; Parandin, F.; Kamarian, R.; Jomour, M.; Alibakhshikenari, M. Ultra-compact photonic crystal based all optical half adder. In 2021 Photonics & Electromagnetics Research Symposium (PIERS); IEEE: Hangzhou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  22. Parandin, F.; Heidari, F.; Rahimi, Z.; Olyaee, S. Two-Dimensional photonic crystal Biosensors: A review. Opt. Laser Technol. 2021, 144, 107397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Parandin, F.; Kamarian, R.; Jomour, M. A novel design of all optical half-subtractor using a square lattice photonic crystals. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 53, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karkhanehchi, M.M.; Parandin, F.; Zahedi, A. Design of an all optical half-adder based on 2D photonic crystals. Photonic Netw. Commun. 2017, 33, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Parandin, F. Ultra-Compact and Low Delay Time All Optical Half Adder Based on Photonic Crystals. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2021, 60, 2275–2280. [Google Scholar]
  26. Alanazi, A.K.; Alizadeh, S.M.; Nurgalieva, K.S.; Nesic, S.; Grimaldo Guerrero, J.W.; Abo-Dief, H.M.; Eftekhari-Zadeh, E.; Nazemi, E.; Narozhnyy, I.M. Application of neural network and time-domain feature extraction techniques for determining volumetric percentages and the type of two phase flow regimes independent of scale layer thickness. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nazemi, E.; Roshani, G.; Feghhi, S.; Setayeshi, S.; Zadeh, E.E.; Fatehi, A. Optimization of a method for identifying the flow regime and measuring void fraction in a broad beam gamma-ray attenuation technique. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 7438–7444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roshani, G.; Nazemi, E.; Roshani, M. Intelligent recognition of gas-oil-water three-phase flow regime and determination of volume fraction using radial basis function. Flow Meas. Instrum. 2017, 54, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hosseini, S.; Taylan, O.; Abusurrah, M.; Akilan, T.; Nazemi, E.; Eftekhari-Zadeh, E.; Bano, F.; Roshani, G.H. Application of Wavelet Feature Extraction and Artificial Neural Networks for Improving the Performance of Gas–Liquid Two-Phase Flow Meters Used in Oil and Petrochemical Industries. Polymers 2021, 13, 3647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nazemi, E.; Feghhi, S.; Roshani, G.; Peyvandi, R.G.; Setayeshi, S. Precise void fraction measurement in two-phase flows independent of the flow regime using gamma-ray attenuation. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2016, 48, 64–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Roshani, G.H.; Roshani, S.; Nazemi, E.; Roshani, S. Online measuring density of oil products in annular regime of gas-liquid two phase flows. Measurement 2018, 129, 296–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Roshani, G.; Hanus, R.; Khazaei, A.; Zych, M.; Nazemi, E.; Mosorov, V. Density and velocity determination for single-phase flow based on radiotracer technique and neural networks. Flow Meas. Instrum. 2018, 61, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Roshani, S.; Azizian, J.; Roshani, S.; Jamshidi, M.B.; Parandin, F. Design of a miniaturized branch line microstrip coupler with a simple structure using artificial neural network. Frequenz 2022, 76, 255–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, A.; Leng, M.; Pan, G.; Yu, M. Automatic Coupler Design Based on Artificial Neural Network with Self-Adaptive Local Surrogates. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2022, 70, 4711–4725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Parandin, F.; Reza Malmir, M. Reconfigurable all optical half adder and optical XOR and AND logic gates based on 2D photonic crystals. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2020, 52, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jamshidi, M.B.; Lalbakhsh, A.; Mohamadzade, B.; Siahkamari, H.; Mousavi, S.M.H. A novel neural-based approach for design of microstrip filters. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2019, 110, 152847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jamshidi, M.; Lalbakhsh, A.; Lotfi, S.; Siahkamari, H.; Mohamadzade, B.; Jalilian, J. A neuro-based approach to designing a Wilkinson power divider. Int. J. RF Microw. Comput. Aided Eng. 2020, 30, e22091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yahya, S.I.; Alameri, B.M.; Jamshidi, M.B.; Roshani, S.; Chaudhary, M.A.; Ijemaru, G.K.; Mezaal, Y.S.; Roshani, S. A New Design Method for Class-E Power Amplifiers Using Artificial Intelligence Modeling for Wireless Power Transfer Applications. Electronics 2022, 11, 3608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Jamshidi, M.B.; Roshani, S.; Talla, J.; Roshani, S.; Peroutka, Z. Size reduction and performance improvement of a microstrip Wilkinson power divider using a hybrid design technique. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 7773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Du, R.-N.; Weng, Z.-B.; Zhang, C. A miniaturized filtering 3-dB branch-line hybrid coupler with wide suppression band. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett. 2018, 73, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Fardin, E.; Holland, A.; Ghorbani, K. Electronically tunable lumped element 90$^{circ} $ hybrid coupler. Electron. Lett. 2006, 42, 353–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Beigizadeh, M.; Dehghani, R.; Nabavi, A. Analysis and design of a lumped-element hybrid coupler using limited quality factor of components. AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2017, 82, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Abd El-Hameed, A.S.; Barakat, A.; Abdel-Rahman, A.B.; Allam, A. Design of low-loss coplanar transmission lines using distributed loading for millimeter-wave power divider/combiner applications in 0.18-µ m CMOS technology. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2018, 66, 5221–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pozar, D.M. Microwave Engineering; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang, F. Miniaturized and harmonics-rejected slow-wave branch-line coupler based on microstrip electromagnetic bandgap element. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2009, 51, 1080–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, J.; Wang, B.-Z.; Guo, Y.-X.; Ong, L.; Xiao, S. A compact slow-wave microstrip branch-line coupler with high performance. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2007, 17, 501–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Lu, K.; Wang, G.-M.; Zhang, C.-X.; Wang, Y.-W. Design of miniaturized branch-line coupler based on novel spiral-based resonators. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2011, 25, 2244–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tsai, K.-Y.; Yang, H.-S.; Chen, J.-H.; Chen, Y.-J.E. A miniaturized 3 dB branch-line hybrid coupler with harmonics suppression. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2011, 21, 537–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Roshani, S.; Roshani, S. A compact coupler design using meandered line compact microstrip resonant cell (MLCMRC) and bended lines. Wirel. Netw. 2021, 27, 677–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. He, J.; Wang, B.-Z.; Shao, W.; Xiao, S.-Q. A Compact Microstrip Branch-Line Coupler with Capacitor Loading. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Workshop Series on Art of Miniaturizing RF and Microwave Passive Components, Chengdu, China, 14–15 December 2008; pp. 139–141. [Google Scholar]
  51. Roshani, S.; Yahya, S.I.; Roshani, S.; Rostami, M. Design and fabrication of a compact branch-line coupler using resonators with wide harmonics suppression band. Electronics 2022, 11, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Honari, M.M.; Mirzavand, R.; Mousavi, P.; Abdipour, A. Class of miniaturised/arbitrary power division ratio couplers with improved design flexibility. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 2015, 9, 1066–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Kim, J.-S.; Kong, K.-B. Compact branch-line coupler for harmonic suppression. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2010, 16, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Gu, J.; Sun, X. Miniaturization and harmonic suppression rat-race coupler using C-SCMRC resonators with distributive equivalent circuit. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 2005, 15, 880–882. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. The structure of the typical 0.8 GHz FBLC. All dimensions are written in mm unit.
Figure 1. The structure of the typical 0.8 GHz FBLC. All dimensions are written in mm unit.
Systems 11 00014 g001
Figure 2. The S-parameters of the typical 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Figure 2. The S-parameters of the typical 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Systems 11 00014 g002
Figure 3. The structure of the proposed 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Figure 3. The structure of the proposed 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Systems 11 00014 g003
Figure 4. The (a) conventional and (b) proposed horizontal branches of the coupler. (c) The S-parameters’ results.
Figure 4. The (a) conventional and (b) proposed horizontal branches of the coupler. (c) The S-parameters’ results.
Systems 11 00014 g004
Figure 5. The (a) conventional and (b) proposed vertical branches of the coupler. (c) The S-parameters’ results.
Figure 5. The (a) conventional and (b) proposed vertical branches of the coupler. (c) The S-parameters’ results.
Systems 11 00014 g005
Figure 6. The layout of the proposed 0.8 GHz FBLC. All dimensions are written in mm unit. Via holes, which are used in the layout, are indicated with 4 circles at upper and lower sections of the device.
Figure 6. The layout of the proposed 0.8 GHz FBLC. All dimensions are written in mm unit. Via holes, which are used in the layout, are indicated with 4 circles at upper and lower sections of the device.
Systems 11 00014 g006
Figure 7. The simulation result of the presented 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Figure 7. The simulation result of the presented 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Systems 11 00014 g007
Figure 8. The effects of (a) capacitors and (b) inductors’ result in the presented LC branches of the designed 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Figure 8. The effects of (a) capacitors and (b) inductors’ result in the presented LC branches of the designed 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Systems 11 00014 g008
Figure 9. The output ports’ phase difference of the presented 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Figure 9. The output ports’ phase difference of the presented 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Systems 11 00014 g009
Figure 10. The fabricated prototype of the presented 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Figure 10. The fabricated prototype of the presented 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Systems 11 00014 g010
Figure 11. The measured results of the proposed 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Figure 11. The measured results of the proposed 0.8 GHz FBLC.
Systems 11 00014 g011
Table 1. The obtained value of applied stubs and lumped elements components.
Table 1. The obtained value of applied stubs and lumped elements components.
LCZ1θ1Z2θ2
6 nH5.2 pF10 Ω15°161 Ω
Table 2. The comparison between proposed 800 MHz branch line coupler and other related works.
Table 2. The comparison between proposed 800 MHz branch line coupler and other related works.
Ref.Operating Frequency (MHz)Size ReductionHarmonics Suppression
[45]240055%-
[46]200072%2nd and 3rd
[33]180066%2nd
[47]135064%2nd and 3rd
[48]116055%-
[49]90064%3rd and 5th
[50]83573%2nd
[51]75084%2nd–7th
[52]100073%2nd
[15]180074%2nd–7th
[53]100063%2nd and 3rd
[54]240055%2nd and 3rd
This work80087%2nd–6th
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roshani, S.; Yahya, S.I.; Mezaal, Y.S.; Chaudhary, M.A.; Al-Hilali, A.A.; Ghadi, Y.Y.; Karimi, M.; Roshani, S. A Compact Filtering Coupler with Unwanted Harmonic Rejection Using LC Composite Lines for Communication Systems Applications. Systems 2023, 11, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010014

AMA Style

Roshani S, Yahya SI, Mezaal YS, Chaudhary MA, Al-Hilali AA, Ghadi YY, Karimi M, Roshani S. A Compact Filtering Coupler with Unwanted Harmonic Rejection Using LC Composite Lines for Communication Systems Applications. Systems. 2023; 11(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roshani, Saeed, Salah I. Yahya, Yaqeen Sabah Mezaal, Muhammad Akmal Chaudhary, Aqeel A. Al-Hilali, Yazeed Yasin Ghadi, Mohsen Karimi, and Sobhan Roshani. 2023. "A Compact Filtering Coupler with Unwanted Harmonic Rejection Using LC Composite Lines for Communication Systems Applications" Systems 11, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop