# A Graphics Process Unit-Based Multiple-Relaxation-Time Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Non-Newtonian Fluid Flows in a Backward Facing Step

^{1}

^{2}

^{3}

^{4}

^{*}

## Abstract

**:**

## 1. Introduction

## 2. Governing Equations on the Macro Scale

## 3. Formulation of the Problem in LBM

#### Multiple-Relaxation-Time Lattice Boltzmann Method

## 4. Non-Newtonian Viscosity Model for the Lattice Boltzmann Method

#### 4.1. Power-Law Viscosity Model (PL)

#### 4.2. Modified Power-Law Viscosity Model (MPL)

## 5. Boundary Conditions for the Flow in a Backward-Facing Step

## 6. GPU Implementation for Lattice Boltzmann Method

#### CUDA Programming Interface

**blockIdx**variable. Block size and grid size can also be determined by using

**block_size**and

**grid_size**variables consecutively in one, two, or three dimensions. For defining the thread ID in three-dimensional block of size $({D}_{i},{D}_{j})$, the thread ID of a thread of index $(i,j)$ is $(i+j{D}_{i})$. Additionally, threads are executed in groups of 32 threads defined as

**warps**by [62], which are created by the thread execution unit to ensure instruction oriented data parallelism inside SM. In CUDA implementation for the GPU acceleration in CPU, the shared memory is accessible within a thread block. The special function unit in each block is the processing unit for the solution of different transcendental functions in single precision. For that reason, the CUDA programming environment implements a hybrid approach for executing serial and parallel code together by using both the parent hardware as the host system and CUDA capable hardware as the device. The environment activates the host to perform sequential programs, including parallel programs of the

**kernel**functions and programs for visual data representations. The CUDA comprises three types of memory organization, thread’s local memory, shared memory, and global memory, managed by CUDA run-time for different types of data transfers between the host and device. The global memory is the constant and texture memory of the DRAM of the GPU hardware, which allocates all the memory allocation for the blocks within the grid and the threads for enabling data parallelism. Thread’s local memory is the sole register memory only used for instruction processing in each thread. In contrast, the shared memory is the cache memory of each block for inter-communication between threads.

**cudaMalloc()**function is used for CUDA memory allocation of DRAM constant and texture variables defined in the host program while

**cudaMemcpy()**performs device-to-host data transfers after executing the parallel computation in the GPU. Shared memory can be defined using

**_shared_**qualifier and can be used in kernel functions. Since data transaction between the host and device is time expensive, the optimal amount of global memory usage can achieve good computational performance for any parallel program in the CUDA C programming environment. The optimized algorithm for the implementation of the latice Boltzmann method is described as in [63]. NVIDIA’s GPU Tesla k40 with 2880 CUDA cores and 12GB RAM and Geforce RTX 2080 Ti with 4352 CUDA cores and 11GB RAM were used in the present research work. Table 1 shows the performance of the two NVIDIA GPUs, and it is clear that Geforce RTX 2080 Ti is more efficient than the Tesla k40 GPU. From this performance table, it can be concluded that performance depends on the higher data transfer bandwidth and the number of CUDA cores.

## 7. Results and Discussion

#### 7.1. Grid Sensitivity Test and Code Validation with Lid-Driven Cavity Flow

#### 7.2. Validation with Channel Flow

#### 7.3. Flow in a Backward-Facing Step

## 8. Conclusions

## Author Contributions

## Funding

## Acknowledgments

## Conflicts of Interest

## Appendix A

## References

- Chhabra, R.P.; Richardson, J.F. Non-Newtonian Flow in the Process Industries: Fundamentals and Engineering Applications; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Bell, B.C.; Surana, K.S. p-version least squares finite element formulation for two-dimensional, incompressible, non-Newtonian isothermal and non-isothermal fluid flow. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids
**1994**, 18, 127–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Neofytou, P. A 3rd order upwind finite volume method for generalised Newtonian fluid flows. Adv. Eng. Softw.
**2005**, 36, 664–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rafiee, A. Modelling of generalized Newtonian lid-driven cavity flow using an SPH method. ANZIAM J.
**2008**, 49, 411–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Syrjälä, S. Finite-element analysis of fully developed laminar flow of power-law non-Newtonian fluid in a rectangular duct. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf.
**1995**, 22, 549–557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bose, A.; Carey, G. Least-squares pr finite element methods for incompressible non-Newtonian flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
**1999**, 180, 431–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Benzi, R.; Succi, S.; Vergassola, M. The lattice Boltzmann equation: Theory and applications. Phys. Rep.
**1992**, 222, 145–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Succi, S. The Lattice Boltzmann Equation: For Fluid Dynamics and Beyond; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2001. [Google Scholar]
- Wolf-Gladrow, D.A. Lattice-Gas Cellular Automata and Lattice Boltzmann Models: An Introduction; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Higuera, F.; Succi, S.; Benzi, R. Lattice gas dynamics with enhanced collisions. EPL Europhys. Lett.
**1989**, 9, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Succi, S.; Foti, E.; Higuera, F. Three-dimensional flows in complex geometries with the lattice Boltzmann method. EPL Europhys. Lett.
**1989**, 10, 433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lavallée, P.; Boon, J.P.; Noullez, A. Boundaries in lattice gas flows. Phys. Nonlinear Phenom.
**1991**, 47, 233–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ziegler, D.P. Boundary conditions for lattice Boltzmann simulations. J. Stat. Phys.
**1993**, 71, 1171–1177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - D’Humieres, D. Generalized lattice Boltzmann Equations, Rarefied Gas Dynamics: Theory and Simulations. Prog. Astronaut. Aeronaut.
**1992**, 159, 450–458. [Google Scholar] - Lallemand, P.; Luo, L.S. Theory of the lattice Boltzmann method: Dispersion, dissipation, isotropy, Galilean invariance, and stability. Phys. Rev. E
**2000**, 61, 6546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version] - D’Humieres, D. Multiple–relaxation–time lattice Boltzmann models in three dimensions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.
**2002**, 360, 437–451. [Google Scholar] - Du, R.; Shi, B.; Chen, X. Multi-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann model for incompressible flow. Phys. Lett. A
**2006**, 359, 564–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Liu, Y.; So, R.; Cui, Z. Bluff body flow simulation using lattice Boltzmann equation with multiple relaxation time. Comput. Fluids
**2006**, 35, 951–956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mezrhab, A.; Moussaoui, M.A.; Jami, M.; Naji, H.; Bouzidi, M. Double MRT thermal lattice Boltzmann method for simulating convective flows. Phys. Lett. A
**2010**, 374, 3499–3507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Z.; Yang, M.; Zhang, Y. Lattice Boltzmann method simulation of 3-D natural convection with double MRT model. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2016**, 94, 222–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Liu, Q.; Feng, X.B.; He, Y.L.; Lu, C.W.; Gu, Q.H. Three-dimensional multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann models for single-phase and solid-liquid phase-change heat transfer in porous media at the REV scale. Appl. Therm. Eng.
**2019**, 152, 319–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mai, H.C.; Lin, K.H.; Yang, C.H.; Lin, C.A. A thermal lattice Boltzmann model for flows with viscous heat dissipation. Comput. Model Eng. Sci.
**2010**, 61, 45–62. [Google Scholar] - Bao, Y.B.; Meskas, J. Lattice Boltzmann Method for Fluid Simulations; Department of Mathematics, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Kuznik, F.; Obrecht, C.; Rusaouen, G.; Roux, J.J. LBM based flow simulation using GPU computing processor. Comput. Math. Appl.
**2010**, 59, 2380–2392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Tölke, J. Implementation of a lattice Boltzmann kernel using the Compute Unified Device Architecture developed by nVIDIA. Comput. Vis. Sci.
**2010**, 13, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ren, Q.; Chan, C.L. Numerical study of double-diffusive convection in a vertical cavity with Soret and Dufour effects by lattice Boltzmann method on GPU. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2016**, 93, 538–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Phillips, T.N.; Roberts, G.W. Lattice Boltzmann models for non-Newtonian flows. IMA J. Appl. Math.
**2011**, 76, 790–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Nejat, A.; Abdollahi, V.; Vahidkhah, K. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of non-Newtonian flows past confined cylinders. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.
**2011**, 166, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chai, Z.; Shi, B.; Guo, Z.; Rong, F. Multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann model for generalized Newtonian fluid flows. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.
**2011**, 166, 332–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Mendu, S.S.; Das, P.K. Flow of power-law fluids in a cavity driven by the motion of two facing lids- simulation by lattice Boltzmann method. J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech.
**2012**, 175–176, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Delouei, A.M.; Nazari, M.; Kayhani, M.H.; Succi, S. Non-Newtonian unconfined flow and heat transfer over a heated cylinder using the direct-forcing immersed boundary–thermal lattice Boltzmann method. Phys. Rev. E
**2014**, 89, 053312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Li, Q.; Hong, N.; Shi, B.; Chai, Z. Simulation of power-law fluid flows in two-dimensional square cavity using multi-relaxation-time lattice boltzmann method. Commun. Comput. Phys.
**2014**, 15, 265–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Riesinger, C.; Bakhtiari, A.; Schreiber, M.; Neumann, P.; Bungartz, H.J. A holistic scalable implementation approach of the lattice Boltzmann method for CPU/GPU heterogeneous clusters. Computation
**2017**, 5, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Geier, M.; Schoenherr, M. Esoteric twist: An efficient in-place streaming algorithmus for the lattice Boltzmann method on massively parallel hardware. Computation
**2017**, 5, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Franco, E.E.; Barrera, H.M.; Laín, S. 2D lid-driven cavity flow simulation using GPU-CUDA with a high-order finite difference scheme. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng.
**2015**, 37, 1329–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Molla, M.M.; Haque, M.J.; Khan, A.; Saha, S.C. GPU Accelerated Multiple-Relaxation-Time Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Convective Flows in a Porous Media. Front. Mech. Eng.
**2018**, 4, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Jin, K.; Vanka, S.; Agarwal, R.; Thomas, B. GPU accelerated simulations of three-dimensional flow of power-law fluids in a driven cube. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dyn.
**2017**, 31, 36–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Rahim, K.Z.; Ahmed, J.; Nag, P.; Molla, M.M. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of natural convection and heat transfer from multiple heated blocks. Heat Transf.
**2020**, 49, 1877–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Bird, R.B.; Armstrong, R.C.; Hassager, O. Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids, Vol. 1: Fluid Mechanics; John Wiley and Sons Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Chhabra, R.P.; Richardson, J.F. Non-Newtonian Flow and Applied Rheology: Engineering Applications, 2nd ed.; Butterworth Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Bird, R.B.; Stewart, W.E.; Lightfoot, W.E. Transport Phenomena; JohnWiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Yao, L.S.; Molla, M.M. Forced convection of non-Newtonian fluids on a heated flat plate. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf.
**2008**, 51, 5154–5159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Boger, D.V. Demonstration of upper and lower Newtonian fluid behaviour in a pseudoplastic fluid. Nature
**1977**, 265, 126–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Molla, M.M.; Yao, L.S. The flow of non-newtonian fluids on a flat plate with a uniform heat flux. J. Heat Transf.
**2009**, 131, 011702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chen, L.; Asai, K.; Nonomura, T.; Xi, G.; Liu, T. A review of Backward-Facing Step (BFS) flow mechanisms, heat transfer and control. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog.
**2018**, 6, 94–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Lee, T.; Mateescu, D. Experimental and numerical investigation of 2-D backward-facing step flow. J. Fluids Struct.
**1998**, 12, 703–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Armaly, B.F.; Durst, F.; Pereira, J.; Schönung, B. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow. J. Fluid Mech.
**1983**, 127, 473–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Erturk, E. Numerical solutions of 2-D steady incompressible flow over a backward-facing step, Part I: High Reynolds number solutions. Comput. Fluids
**2008**, 37, 633–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Xiong, W.; Zhang, J. A two-dimensional lattice Boltzmann model for uniform channel flows. Comput. Math. Appl.
**2011**, 61, 3453–3460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Zhou, J.G.; Liu, H.; Shafiai, S.; Peng, Y.; Burrows, R. Lattice boltzmann method for open-channel flows. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng.-Eng. Comput. Mech.
**2010**, 163, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Wu, J.S.; Shao, Y.L. Simulation of lid-driven cavity flows by parallel lattice Boltzmann method using multi-relaxation-time scheme. Int J. Numer. Methods Fluids
**2004**, 46, 921–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Velivelli, A.C.; Bryden, K.M. Domain decomposition based coupling between the lattice Boltzmann method and traditional CFD methods—Part II: Numerical solution to the backward facing step flow. Adv. Eng. Softw. Thomson Reuters
**2015**, 82, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Ameur, H.; Menni, Y. Non-Newtonian fluid flows through backward-facing steps. SN Appl. Sci.
**2019**, 1, 1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Shupti, S.P.; Molla, M.M.; Mia, M. Pulsatile non-Newtonian fluid flows in a model aneurysm with oscillating wall. Front. Mech. Eng.
**2017**, 3, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Siddiki, M.N.A.A.; Molla, M.M.; Thohura, S.; Saha, S.C. Lattice Boltzmann simulation of Non-Newtonian power-law fluid flows in a bifurcated channel. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 1980, p. 040023. [Google Scholar]
- Thohura, S.; Molla, M.M.; Sarker, M. Natural convection of non-Newtonian shear-thinning fluid flow inside a skewed cavity. In AIP Conference Proceedings; AIP Publishing LLC: New York, NY, USA, 2019; Volume 2121, p. 030014. [Google Scholar]
- Thohura, S.; Molla, M.M.; Sarker, M.M.A. Numerical simulation of non-Newtonian power-law fluid flow in a lid-driven skewed cavity. Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math.
**2019**, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Thohura, S.; Molla, M.M.; Sarker, M. Bingham fluid flow simulation in a lid-driven skewed cavity using the finite-volume method. Int. J. Comput. Math.
**2020**, 97, 1212–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Chai, Z.; Shi, B.; Guo, Z. A multiple-relaxation-time lattice Boltzmann model for general nonlinear anisotropic convection–diffusion equations. J. Sci. Comput.
**2016**, 69, 355–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Molla, M.M.; Yao, L.S. Non-Newtonian natural convection along a vertical heated wavy surface using a modified Power-Law Viscosity Model. J. Heat Transf.
**2009**, 131, 012501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Zou, Q.; He, X. On pressure and velocity boundary conditions for the lattice Boltzmann BGK model. Phys. Fluids
**1997**, 9, 1591–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version] - Nvidia, C. C Programming Guide Version 4.0; Nvidia Corporation: Clara, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Jahidul Haque, M.; Mamun Molla, M.; Amirul Islam Khan, M.; Ahsan, K. Graphics process unit accelerated lattice Boltzmann simulation of indoor air flow: Effects of sub-grid scale model in large-eddy simulation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
**2020**, 234, 4024–4040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ghia, U.G.; Ghia, K.N.; Shin, C.T. High-Re solutions for incompressible flow using the Navier-Stokes equations and a multigrid method. J. Comp. Phys.
**1982**, 48, 387–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] - Ilio, G.D.; Chiappini, D.; Bella, G. A comparison of numerical methods for non-Newtonian fluid flows in a sudden expansion. Int. J. Mod. Phys. C
**2016**, 27, 1650139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

**Figure 1.**The schematic model and coordinates systems: (

**a**) flow in a lid-driven cavity, (

**b**) flow in a channel, and (

**c**) flow in a backward facing step.

**Figure 2.**Grid sensitivity test interms of the horizontal velocity profiles, $u/U$, for the lid driven cavity (

**a**) $n=0.5$, (

**b**) $n=1.0$ and (

**c**) $n=1.5$ at $x/H=0.5$$\text{}Re=500$.

**Figure 3.**Velocity profiles for the lid driven cavity (

**a**) $u/U$ at $x/H=0.5$ and (

**b**) $v/U$ at $y/H=0.5$ while $Re=100$.

**Figure 4.**Velocity profiles for the lid driven cavity (

**a**) $u/U$ at $x/H=0.5$ and (

**b**) $v/U$ at $y/H=0.5$ while $Re=500$.

**Figure 5.**Streamlines for the lid driven cavity flow: (

**a**) $n=0.5$, (

**b**) $n=1.0$ (Newtonian), and (

**c**) $n=1.5$ while $Re=100$.

**Figure 6.**Qualitative comparison of the the streamlines with the results of Li et al. [32] for the lid driven cavity flow: (

**a**) $n=0.5$ (shear-thinning), (

**b**) $n=1.0$ (Newtonian), and (

**c**) $n=1.5$ (shear-thickening) while $Re=500$.

**Figure 7.**Velocity profile $u/U$ for the channel flow at (

**a**) $n=0.5$, (

**b**) $n=0.8$, (

**c**) $n=1.0$, (

**d**) $n=1.2$, and (

**e**) $n=1.5$.

**Figure 8.**Streamlines for the power-law non-Newtonian fluids flow in a sudden expansion channel with aspect ratio ($H/d=3.0$): (

**i**) BGK-LBM results of Ilio et al. [65] and (

**ii**) present MRT-LBM for (

**a**) $n=0.6$, (

**b**) $n=1.0$ and (

**c**) $n=1.4$.

**Figure 9.**Streamlines for different power-law indexes: (

**a**) $n=0.5$, (

**b**) $n=0.8$, (

**c**) $n=1.0$, (

**d**) $n=1.2$, (

**e**) $n=1.5$ while $Re=100$ (left) and (

**f**) $n=0.5$, (

**g**) $n=0.8$, (

**h**) $n=1.0$, (

**i**) $n=1.2$, (

**j**) $n=1.5$ while $Re=200$ (right).

**Figure 10.**Streamlines for different power-law indexes: (

**a**) $n=1.5$, (

**b**) $n=1.2$, (

**c**) $n=1.0$, (

**d**) $n=0.8$, (

**e**) $n=0.5$ while $Re=300$.

**Figure 11.**Streamlines for different power-law indexes: (

**a**) $n=1.5$, (

**b**) $n=1.2$, (

**c**) $n=1.0$, (

**d**) $n=0.8$, (

**e**) $n=0.5$ while $Re=400$.

**Figure 12.**Velocity $u/U$ distribution at the different axial locations of the downstream region while $Re=100$ and n (=0.5, 1.0, 1.5).

**Figure 13.**Velocity $u/U$ distribution at the different axial locations of the downstream region while $Re=200$ and n (=0.5, 1.0, 1.5).

**Figure 14.**Skin-friction coefficient, ${C}_{f}={\tau}_{w}/{\textstyle \frac{1}{2}}{\rho}_{0}{U}^{2}$ at the lower wall for the different values of power-law index n at (

**a**) $Re=100$ and (

**b**) $Re=200$.

**Figure 15.**Skin-friction coefficient, ${C}_{f}={\tau}_{w}/{\textstyle \frac{1}{2}}{\rho}_{0}{U}^{2}$ at the lower wall for the different values of power-law index n at (

**a**) $Re=300$ and (

**b**) $Re=400$.

**Table 1.**Performance of the Double precession MRT-LBM simulation time in GPU1:Tesla k40 and GPU2: Geforce RTX 2080 Ti for the different mesh arrangements while $Re=400$ for the backward facing step problem.

Lattice Size | Average Time (s)/Step: | ${\mathit{t}}_{\mathbf{GPU}1}$ | ${\mathit{t}}_{\mathbf{GPU}2}$ | Speed up = ${\mathit{t}}_{\mathbf{GPU}1}/{\mathit{t}}_{\mathbf{GPU}2}$ | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

512 × 32 | $1.68\times {10}^{-4}$ | $3.89\times {10}^{-5}$ | 4.3 | |||

1024 × 64 | $4.45\times {10}^{-4}$ | $1.37\times {10}^{-4}$ | 3.3 | |||

2048 × 128 | $7.93\times {10}^{-4}$ | $2.56\times {10}^{-4}$ | 3.1 |

**Table 2.**Comparison of the center of the primary vortex for the different power-law indexes n while $Re=500$.

Center of Primary Vortex | $\mathit{n}=0.5$ | $\mathit{n}=1.0$ | $\mathit{n}=1.5$ | |
---|---|---|---|---|

Neoftou [3] | 0.5731 | 0.5494 | 0.5495 | |

${x}_{c}$ | Li et al. [32] | 0.5793 | 0.5467 | 0.5495 |

Present | 0.5762 | 0.5449 | 0.5469 | |

Neoftou [3] | 0.5490 | 0.5935 | 0.6380 | |

${y}_{c}$ | Li et al. [32] | 0.5497 | 0.5947 | 0.6378 |

Present | 0.5449 | 0.5938 | 0.6367 |

**Table 3.**Grid sensitivity test for the flow in a backward-facing step in terms of the length of reattachment point ${x}_{r}/h$ of the primary recirculation zone at the bottom wall for the different power-law index n while $Re=400$.

Grid Size | $\mathit{n}=0.5$ | $\mathit{n}=1.0$ | $\mathit{n}=1.5$ |
---|---|---|---|

512 × 32 | 11.774 (time-mean) | 8.182 | 5.181 |

1024 × 64 | 9.601 (time-mean) | 8.219 | 5.667 |

2048 × 128 | 10.258 (time-mean) | 8.231 | 5.412 |

**Table 4.**Length of reattachment point ${x}_{r}/h$ of the primary recirculation zone at the bottom wall for the different power-law indexes n and for different Reynolds numbers $Re$.

$\mathbf{Re}$ | $\mathit{n}=0.5$ | $\mathit{n}=0.8$ | $\mathit{n}=1.0$ (Erturk [48]) | $\mathit{n}=1.2$ | $\mathit{n}=1.5$ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|

100 | 4.501 | 3.512 | 2.984 (2.922) | 2.539 | 1.943 |

200 | 8.171 | 6.032 | 5.032 (4.921) | 4.213 | 3.229 |

300 | – | 7.332 | 6.951 (6.751) | 5.853 | 4.530 |

400 | – | – | 8.231 (8.237) | 6.974 | 5.412 |

$\mathit{y}/\mathit{h}$ | n = 0.5 | n = 1.0 | n = 1.5 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

$\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{2}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{3}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{4}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{2}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{3}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{4}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{1}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{2}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{3}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathbf{4}$ | |

0.0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |

0.2 | $-2.99\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-2.46\times {10}^{-2}$ | $1.55\times {10}^{-2}$ | −0.3055 | $-7.09\times {10}^{-2}$ | −0.1299 | −0.1668 | −0.1786 | −0.1441 | −0.2448 | −0.1785 | $8.195\times {10}^{-3}$ |

0.4 | $-3.7\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-2.46\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-2.90\times {10}^{-2}$ | −0.3067 | −0.1003 | −0.1467 | −0.1481 | −0.1008 | −0.1870 | −0.1544 | 2.3625 | 0.2547 |

0.6 | $-2.78\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-2.67\times {10}^{-2}$ | $2.03\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-9.93\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-6.35\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-3.48\times {10}^{-2}$ | $3.93\times {10}^{-2}$ | 0.1626 | $-4.12\times {10}^{-2}$ | 0.1388 | 0.3697 | 0.5906 |

0.8 | $2.25\times {10}^{-2}$ | $6.69\times {10}^{-2}$ | 0.1593 | 0.3514 | $8.45\times {10}^{-2}$ | 0.2331 | 0.3718 | 0.3712 | 0.5431 | 0.5349 | 0.7686 | 0.9284 |

1.0 | 0.3123 | 0.4578 | 0.4463 | 0.80259 | 0.4771 | 0.6674 | 0.8231 | 0.9627 | 0.7183 | 0.9881 | 1.1310 | 1.1668 |

1.2 | 1.0666 | 1.1125 | 1.0396 | 1.1888 | 1.1104 | 1.1846 | 1.2351 | 1.2488 | 1.2863 | 1.3904 | 1.3391 | 1.1122 |

1.4 | 1.3821 | 1.3420 | 1.2854 | 1.3895 | 1.4705 | 1.4295 | 1.3542 | 1.2265 | 1.6628 | 1.4538 | 1.1298 | 0.8389 |

1.6 | 1.3583 | 1.3033 | 1.2564 | 1.2903 | 1.3764 | 1.2506 | 1.0873 | 0.8813 | 1.3926 | 1.0624 | 0.7338 | 0.4911 |

1.8 | 0.9275 | 0.8582 | 0.8651 | 0.7826 | 0.8378 | 0.6930 | 0.5435 | 0.3868 | 0.7577 | 0.5172 | 0.3165 | 0.1888 |

2.0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |

$\mathit{y}/\mathit{h}$ | n = 0.5 | n = 1.0 | n = 1.5 | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

$\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{1}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{2}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{3}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{4}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{1}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{2}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{3}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{4}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{1}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{2}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{3}$ | $\mathit{x}/\mathit{h}=\mathit{4}$ | |

0.0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |

0.2 | $1.0\times {10}^{-2}$ | −0.1114 | −0.4377 | $2.24\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-5.64\times {10}^{-2}$ | −0.1073 | −0.1440 | −0.1697 | −0.1066 | −0.2209 | −0.2415 | −0.1359 |

0.4 | $-1.24\times {10}^{-2}$ | −0.1399 | −0.4377 | $-7.92\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-8.53\times {10}^{-2}$ | −0.1334 | −0.1525 | −0.1464 | −0.1626 | −0.1908 | $-9.24\times {10}^{-2}$ | $9.41\times {10}^{-2}$ |

0.6 | $-9.73\times {10}^{-6}$ | $-6.24\times {10}^{-2}$ | −0.1411 | 0.1766 | $-6.33\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-5.53\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-1.74\times {10}^{-2}$ | $4.88\times {10}^{-2}$ | $-7.04\times {10}^{-2}$ | $5.22\times {10}^{-2}$ | 0.2302 | 0.4469 |

0.8 | $5.43\times {10}^{-2}$ | 0.1036 | 0.3798 | 0.6877 | $5.4756\times {10}^{-2}$ | 0.1586 | 0.2653 | 0.3859 | 0.1778 | 0.4136 | 0.6304 | 0.8303 |

1.0 | 0.2437 | 0.3805 | 0.9326 | 1.0827 | 0.4214 | 1.1430 | 0.7124 | 0.8338 | 0.6241 | 0.8702 | 1.0475 | 1.1564 |

1.2 | 0.8616 | 0.8558 | 1.3894 | 1.2368 | 1.0801 | 1.1846 | 1.1938 | 1.2318 | 1.2100 | 1.3259 | 1.3617 | 1.2435 |

1.4 | 1.3162 | 1.3480 | 1.4705 | 1.0493 | 1.4635 | 1.4403 | 1.3998 | 1.3348 | 1.6266 | 1.5137 | 1.2763 | 0.9784 |

1.6 | 1.3205 | 1.3520 | 1.1135 | 0.5684 | 1.3900 | 1.3028 | 1.1941 | 1.0572 | 1.4076 | 1.1568 | 0.8707 | 0.5929 |

1.8 | 0.8676 | 0.8775 | 0.4677 | $3.71\times {10}^{-2}$ | 0.8634 | 0.7518 | 0.6393 | 0.5169 | 0.7793 | 0.5822 | 0.3914 | 0.2297 |

2.0 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 |

© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

## Share and Cite

**MDPI and ACS Style**

Molla, M.M.; Nag, P.; Thohura, S.; Khan, A. A Graphics Process Unit-Based Multiple-Relaxation-Time Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Non-Newtonian Fluid Flows in a Backward Facing Step. *Computation* **2020**, *8*, 83.
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation8030083

**AMA Style**

Molla MM, Nag P, Thohura S, Khan A. A Graphics Process Unit-Based Multiple-Relaxation-Time Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Non-Newtonian Fluid Flows in a Backward Facing Step. *Computation*. 2020; 8(3):83.
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation8030083

**Chicago/Turabian Style**

Molla, Md. Mamun, Preetom Nag, Sharaban Thohura, and Amirul Khan. 2020. "A Graphics Process Unit-Based Multiple-Relaxation-Time Lattice Boltzmann Simulation of Non-Newtonian Fluid Flows in a Backward Facing Step" *Computation* 8, no. 3: 83.
https://doi.org/10.3390/computation8030083