Next Article in Journal
Tantric Yoga in the Mārkaṇḍeya Purāṇa of Hinduism and the Jñānārṇava of Jainism
Next Article in Special Issue
The Implicit as a Resource for Engaging Normativity in Religious Studies
Previous Article in Journal
Theology Facing Religious Diversity: The Perspective of Latin American Pluralist Theology
Previous Article in Special Issue
Naturalism, Normativity, and the Study of Religion
Article Menu
Issue 11 (November) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Religions 2017, 8(11), 234;

Intelligibility and Normativity in the Study of Religion

Center for Theology, Science, and Human Flourishing, University of Notre Dame, 1201 Flanner Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
Received: 23 August 2017 / Revised: 20 September 2017 / Accepted: 13 October 2017 / Published: 25 October 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Description, Prescription, and Value in the Study of Religion)
Full-Text   |   PDF [214 KB, uploaded 25 October 2017]


In his essay “The Devil in Mr. Jones,” J. Z. Smith issues a call. If religionists do not, he writes, “persist in the quest for intelligibility, there can be no human sciences, let alone, any place for the study of religion within them.” How should Smith’s call be construed? In other words, what constitutes the “quest for intelligibility”? And what (if anything) differentiates the religionist’s quest for intelligibility from that of other humanistic scholars? Taking as my starting point Smith’s call, I will mount a constructive proposal. On my proposal, religionists should conceive their task as twofold. First, religionists should comparatively describe religious phenomena. Second, they should evaluate these phenomena. Only if the practices of description and prescription are tethered will religious studies succeed in its quest for intelligibility. View Full-Text
Keywords: comparison; description; normativity; prescription; John P. Reeder Jr.; J. Z. Smith comparison; description; normativity; prescription; John P. Reeder Jr.; J. Z. Smith
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Ranganathan, B. Intelligibility and Normativity in the Study of Religion. Religions 2017, 8, 234.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Religions EISSN 2077-1444 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert Logo copyright Steve Bridenbaugh/UUA
Back to Top