Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Charisma and Counterculture: Allen Ginsberg as a Prophet for a New Generation
Previous Article in Journal
When Institutions Collide: The Competing Forces of Hospitals Sponsored by the Roman Catholic Church
Previous Article in Special Issue
Charisma and Routine: Shaping the Memory of Brother Richard and Joan of Arc
Article

Drama & Demigods: Kingship and Charisma in Shakespeare’s England

Jepson School of Leadership Studies, University of Richmond, 28 Westhampton Way, Richmond, VA 23173, USA
Religions 2013, 4(1), 30-50; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010030
Received: 3 December 2012 / Revised: 17 January 2013 / Accepted: 18 January 2013 / Published: 22 January 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Charisma, Medieval and Modern)
Shakespearean charisma, with its medieval roots in both religion and politics, served as a precursor to Max Weber’s later understanding of the term. The on-stage portrayal of charismatic kingship in the twilight of the Tudor dynasty was not coincidental; facing the imminent death of a queen, the English nation was concerned about the future of the monarchy. Through the depiction of the production and deterioration of royal charisma, Shakespeare presents the anxiety of a population aware of the latent dangers of charismatic authority; while Elizabeth managed to perpetuate an unprecedented degree of long-term charismatic rule, there could be no certainty that her successor would be similarly capable. Shakespeare’s second tetralogy — known as the Henriad — examines this royal charisma as it appears both under crisis and in the process of what Weber would later characterize as routinization. While Henry IV (Bolingbroke) originally makes use of charisma to ensure his succession to Richard II’s throne, he loses his charismatic authority in the process. Henry V, by contrast, makes use of deliberate crisis — his claim to the French crown — in order to restore royal charisma. Henry V’s success, however, cannot last, and his son’s reign is a disastrous reminder that charisma is, as Weber will later argue, inherently unstable. View Full-Text
Keywords: Shakespeare; charisma; monarchy; Henry V; Henry IV; Richard II; Weber; divine right; Elizabeth I Shakespeare; charisma; monarchy; Henry V; Henry IV; Richard II; Weber; divine right; Elizabeth I
MDPI and ACS Style

Bezio, K.M.S. Drama & Demigods: Kingship and Charisma in Shakespeare’s England. Religions 2013, 4, 30-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010030

AMA Style

Bezio KMS. Drama & Demigods: Kingship and Charisma in Shakespeare’s England. Religions. 2013; 4(1):30-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bezio, Kristin M.S. 2013. "Drama & Demigods: Kingship and Charisma in Shakespeare’s England" Religions 4, no. 1: 30-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel4010030

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop