Next Article in Journal
The City of Man, European Émigrés, and the Genesis of Postwar Conservative Thought
Next Article in Special Issue
Francesco Petrarca and the Parameters of Historical Research
Previous Article in Journal
Penitence, Confession, and the Power of Submission in Late Medieval Women's Religious Communities
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Global Consequences of Mistranslation: The Adoption of the “Black but …” Formulation in Europe, 1440–1650
Article

Saving Renaissance and Reformation: History, Grammar, and Disagreements with the Dead

Department of History and the College, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
Religions 2012, 3(3), 662-680; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030662
Received: 2 July 2012 / Revised: 26 July 2012 / Accepted: 27 July 2012 / Published: 6 August 2012
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From the Renaissance to the Modern World)
Renaissance and Reformation used to serve historians as the main terms with which to refer to European history from roughly 1300–1600. Today those terms are commonly replaced with early modern history, and the periodization of European history into ancient, medieval, and modern periods itself is looking increasingly suspect. There are good reasons for those changes. But they obscure both the significance of disagreements dividing the living from the dead and the significance of grammar, in the fundamental sense of grammar advanced by Wittgenstein, for treating such disagreements. Renaissance and Reformation have the advantage of doing just the opposite: they confront us with both those disagreements and the significance of grammar. That makes them very much worth keeping. View Full-Text
Keywords: antiquity; Renaissance; Reformation; Humanism; early modern; Wittgenstein; grammar; historiography; philosophy of history antiquity; Renaissance; Reformation; Humanism; early modern; Wittgenstein; grammar; historiography; philosophy of history
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Fasolt, C. Saving Renaissance and Reformation: History, Grammar, and Disagreements with the Dead. Religions 2012, 3, 662-680. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030662

AMA Style

Fasolt C. Saving Renaissance and Reformation: History, Grammar, and Disagreements with the Dead. Religions. 2012; 3(3):662-680. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030662

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fasolt, Constantin. 2012. "Saving Renaissance and Reformation: History, Grammar, and Disagreements with the Dead" Religions 3, no. 3: 662-680. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel3030662

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop