“Christ for You and Me”: A Lutheran Theology of Proclamation and the Presence of the Preacher
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Unpacking “Personally Present”3
2.1. Personally Present to the Words
2.2. Personally Present to the People
3. Lutheran Preaching Compels the Preacher’s Personal Presence
3.1. Law and Gospel
3.2. Lutheran Preaching Prioritizes Proclamation
The most apt paradigm for such speaking is the absolution “I declare unto you the gracious forgiveness of all your sins in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.” Proclamation is not “about” something other than itself. It does not point away from itself. It does not signify some other thing. It is the saying and the doing of the deed itself, for example, “I baptize you…” The deed is done, unconditionally. It is not an account of what happened in the past, such as, “God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son,” true as that is and, indeed, as much as it authorizes the primary discourse. Such accounts are past tense. Proclamation is present tense: I here and now give to you, Christ himself, the body and blood of the Savior. I do it in both Word and sacrament. This is God’s present move, the current “mighty act” of the living God.(Forde 1990, p. 2; emphasis original)
3.3. Lutheran Preaching Is “For You”
The words “for you” reveal the profoundly personal nature of the gospel. Christ “suffered and rose again” not in a distant, abstract sense for all people but for each particular person who hears and believes the proclamation through which God in Christ speaks to them. It is true that Christ achieved forgiveness on the cross “once for all;” however, Luther explains, “he has not yet distributed or given it on the cross” (Luther 1958, pp. 213–14). He distributes and gives it through proclamation. Proclamation is prioritized in Lutheran preaching so that each hearer might not merely understand what God has done in Christ in general, but personally know and experience the benefits of this good news for themselves. Through proclamation, individuals become new human beings; individuals are forgiven and justified. Through proclamation, “for all” becomes “for you.” Meuser goes so far as to say that without this proclamation, “without the word spoken by a believer, the Gospel cannot do its work” (Meuser 2006, p. 141).17Therefore, when you begin to believe, you discover at the same time that everything in you is completely blameworthy, damnable sins, as Rom. 3[:23] states: “All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” And Rom. 3[:10–12] says, “There is no one who is righteous,” no one does good, “all have turned aside, altogether they have done worthless things.” By this knowledge you will realize that you need Christ, who suffered and rose again for you, in order that, believing in him, you may become another human being by this faith, because all your sins are forgiven and you are justified by another’s merits, namely, by Christ’s alone.(Luther and Wengert 2016, p. 492; emphasis added)
Luther encourages us to receive the Words of Institution as the needy and vulnerable human beings we are, that we might experience the for you-ness of the bread and cup and ponder it in our hearts (cf. Luke 2:19). These words, along with the promises of “forgiveness of sin, life, and salvation,” (Kolb et al. 2000, p. 362) are ours.Here stand the gracious and lovely words, “This is my body, given FOR YOU,” “This is my blood, shed FOR YOU for the forgiveness of sins.” These words, as I have said, are not preached to wood or stone but to you and me; otherwise, he might just as well have kept quiet and not instituted a sacrament. Ponder, then, and include yourself personally in the “YOU” so that he may not speak to you in vain.(Kolb et al. 2000, p. 473; emphasis added)
The preacher declares what God has done for you in Christ, giving the gospel as freely to each as the bread and cup are placed in each one’s hands, in faith that when the preacher does this, Christ himself speaks to grant forgiveness, life, and salvation to the hearers.19The preaching of the Word, that is, is to do the same thing as the sacrament—to give Christ and all his blessings. Indeed, since the Word is Christ, preaching is “pouring Christ into our ears” just as in the sacraments we are baptized into him, and he is poured into our mouths.
We can read words on a page or scroll through them on a screen and choose to close them at any time, untouched. The experience is not the same as being presented with a word declared to be for us right now by someone who is personally present to us, looking at us, speaking to us directly. The prioritization of proclamation in Lutheran preaching offers a rare moment to simply receive the gift of “good news of great joy” (Luke 2:10), which is for us personally.20Indeed, we would be better off replacing sola Scriptura with the phrase solus Christus (Christ alone) and, what amounts to the same thing, solo Verbo, by the Word alone—where “the Word” was for Luther not simply the Bible but its proclamation. Thus, already in 1522 Luther could write about the church that it is not a “quill house” but a “mouth house.” God’s Word was God’s Word when proclaimed “for you,” not when shut up in a book, where it was good only for others or for nothing.(Wengert 2013, p. 19; emphasis added)
3.4. A Note to My Ecumenical Partners
4. Fostering Personal Presence
4.1. Embodying Faith: Remembering the Wisdom of the Body26
- Vigorously pat down your entire body with your hands as if you are clapping all over your body, front and back, from your head to your toes. This invites energy and awareness to physical sensation.27
- Close your eyes for the rest of the exercise, as you feel comfortable, to help draw your focus inward.
- When was a time you felt nourished by the Gospel, fed by the Gospel? When was the last time you felt full of good news that was sustaining to you? If you have never felt this, imagine what it could be like to be fed, nourished, and sustained by the Gospel.
- Once something has come to you, let your body find shape to express that feeling. Find a pose, a gesture, or a repeated movement that allows that feeling to become tangible in your body. (Give time to find the shape.) Take a deep breath in as you hold that shape. Say the word “nourished” aloud, full of the feeling of what your body is expressing. Let that go. (Repeat this section with each word.)
- When was a time you felt “justified” by grace through faith so that justification was palpable? When was a moment of recognition that in Christ, you, personally, have been made righteous before God, that in Christ, you are reconciled? If you have never felt this, imagine what it could be like to experience justification. (Repeat 3.a.)
- When was a time you felt “free”? When have you experienced freedom in Christ, freedom that frees you to turn outward and soften toward others? If you have never felt this, imagine what it could be like to know freedom in Christ in your body. (Repeat 3.a.)
- When was the last time you experienced “salvation,” so that salvation was an event, you were brought from death to life, the old passed away, and the new came into being? Even if just for a moment, you could taste the kingdom of God. If you have never felt this, imagine what it could be like to see, hear, touch, taste salvation. (Repeat 3.a.)
- Martin Luther writes, “To preach Christ means to feed, justify, free, and save the soul—provided a person believes the preaching” (Luther and Wengert 2016, p. 491). At some moment, you believed the preaching, or you would not be here. Now you are the person who does the preaching. Thanks be to God.
4.2. I Am Here in This Room with All of You28
- Stand in a circle.29
- Close your eyes as you feel comfortable to help draw your focus inward.
- Turn your attention to the inside of your body. Scan through your body and notice any physical sensations that present themselves. Feel which parts of your feet are touching the floor. Feel the parts of your body that are being moved by your breath. Feel your heart beating. Tune into your state of being. With that physical awareness, say aloud, “I am here…”
- Open your eyes and notice the room you are in with greater attentiveness than you usually do. See any artwork, cracked and faded paint, light coming in through the windows, the floor on which you are standing, the furniture, and anything else. Allow any memories or associations that come to you to be there. With that special awareness, say aloud, “…in this room…”
- See the people in the room with greater attentiveness than you usually do. Notice their facial expressions. Sense their presence, their energy, what their bodies are communicating. If your eyes meet someone else’s, let yourself linger together for a moment. (If the group is small enough, take the time to meet everyone eye to eye.) Notice whether you are holding your breath as you see people, and keep breathing.30 With that awareness of the people in the room, say aloud, “…with all of you.”
- Keeping your eyes open and maintaining your connection to yourself, your space, and your group, say, “I am here in this room with all of you.”
4.3. God Be in My Body31
- Stretch the right side of your body by keeping your right foot flat on the floor and stretching your right arm as high as it will go. Do the same on your left side.
- Stretch the right side of your body in the same way, this time yawning as you stretch, to open space for breath in the right side of the ribcage. Do the same on your left side.
- Bend your knees and round your spine forward into a “C” shape while bringing your arms forward as if holding a physioball. Yawn as you hold this stretch, to open space for breath in the back ribs.
- Bend your knees and reverse the movement, creating a backward “C” shape (or arch) with your spine while bringing your arms out to shoulder height. Yawn as you hold this stretch, to open space for breath in the front ribs and the heart.
- Release your head and neck forward and slowly undo your spine, vertebra by vertebra, as far down as provides a comfortable stretch for your spine. Let your knees be a little bent, and keep your weight evenly balanced on your feet. Yawn and feel your spine release a little further toward the ground on the outgoing breath.
- Slowly float your way back up to standing, taking a moment with just your head and neck still released to find your equilibrium, if needed.
- Bring your hands to your head and pray aloud: “God be in my head, and in my understanding.”
- Bring your hands to your eyes and pray aloud: “God be in my eyes, and in my looking.”
- Bring your hands to your ears and pray aloud: “God be in my ears, and in my hearing.”
- Bring your hands to your mouth and pray aloud: “God be in my mouth, and in my speaking.”
- Bring your hands to your heart and pray aloud: “God be in my heart, and in my pondering.”
- Bring your hands to your abdomen and pray aloud: “God be in my gut, and in my feeling.”
- Bring your hands to your legs and pray aloud: “God be in my legs, and in my moving.”
- Slowly release your spine down again, with the intention of releasing to God all the parts of you in which you have not been aware of God’s presence.
- As you float your way back up to standing, claim the truth that your body was “fearfully and wonderfully made” (Ps 139:14) by God. “Your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit” (1 Cor 6:19), a place in which God is pleased to dwell.
- Bring your arms straight up toward the ceiling and pray aloud: God be in my body, and in my being.
4.4. The Dimensionality of the Body32
- Inside–Outside
- 2.
- Gravity–Levity
- 3.
- Front Body–Back Body
- 4.
- Text
This is a sampling of exercises that I have found useful and that I hope can help preachers strengthen their ability to be personally present to their words and their people as they give them the gift of the gospel. I invite homileticians to adapt these exercises as needed and to develop their own. I recommend students be given a way to process their experience, whether through a class discussion immediately following the exercise or through a reflective journaling assignment.34 It is not a small thing to be personally present to the words God uses to bring your people from death to life, and it is not a small thing for you to be “in this room” with your people as God does.I bless the Lord who gives me counsel;in the night also my heart instructs me.I keep the Lord always before me;because he is at my right hand, I shall not be moved.Therefore my heart is glad, and my soul rejoices;my body also rests secure.For you do not give me up to Sheol,or let your faithful one see the Pit.You show me the path of life.In your presence there is fullness of joy;in your right hand are pleasures forevermore.
5. Christ for You and Me
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
1 | I spent ten years (2012–2022) as a student, teaching assistant, and graduate instructor in Princeton Theological Seminary’s speech department. For a historical overview of the Princeton school of speech through 1992, see (Bartow 1992). See also these more recent publications from Princeton Seminary speech faculty and a festschrift honoring the work of Charles Bartow: (Bartow 1997; Brothers 2014; Gross 2017; Childers and Schmit 2008). |
2 | I was certified as a Designated Linklater Teacher in 2019. The methodology and basic outline of the exercises are found here: (Linklater 2006). Further resources can be found here: (Articles & Essays n.d.). Kristin Linklater developed this work with actors in mind; however, it has borne fruit in homiletics. See (Childers 1998; Hooke 2002, 2007, 2010, 2023; Gilmore 2022). |
3 | For the purposes of this paper, I am assuming a neurotypical, able-bodied preacher and the mainstream United States culture in which I have always lived and worked. I recognize that context matters and that my description of presence does not apply to all people and communities. |
4 | Charles Bartow, borrowing from performance studies, refers to the written text as an “arrested performance” that cannot be understood as an end in itself, but must be performed, played by the human body and voice. (Bartow 1997, p. 64) |
5 | The body’s vital contribution to communication can be witnessed in the everyday use of emojis and memes. These options allow for more holistic and specific expression than words alone. |
6 | By filling in gaps, I mean that the preacher who is not personally present to the words does not communicate all of the information normally manifested by the body and voice. The listener is left to imagine the meaning that would be communicated through these means. By deciphering contradictions, I mean that the body and voice may actually contradict the words. The words suggest freedom and abundance, but the body and voice suggest constraint and constriction. The words say “grace” and “mercy,” but the body and voice communicate as one who is not experiencing them—so, are they real? |
7 | I acknowledge that not all of these things are possible in every congregation, especially larger congregations that place the pulpit far away from the congregation or use stage lights that inhibit seeing the congregation. This use of space may suggest a theology of preaching that does not prioritize personal presence with the congregation and the participation of the congregation in preaching. Large congregations, however, are a minority in the United States. Most congregations are small, so that congregation size is not a barrier to these things becoming realities. Small congregations worshipping in large buildings might be encouraged to sit further forward and closer together in the sanctuary or to worship in an alternative room in the building better suited to personal presence and congregational participation (Wingfield 2022; Earls 2021; Potter 2017). |
8 | “Indicate” is a common term in the theater used to refer to an actor who is attempting to show what their character is feeling or doing without actually feeling or doing it. An audience generally struggles to suspend disbelief with an actor who is indicating because they are distracted by the fake, inauthentic, or overacted performance. A preacher who indicated a relationship with a congregation that did not actually exist would probably also be experienced as fake, inauthentic, and “acting,” in the worst sense of the word (e.g., pretending, lying). |
9 | Lutheran theologian Marit Trelstad notes that within the theological use of the law, one can discern within Luther’s writings both “descriptive” and “performative” functions. She acknowledges the usefulness of the descriptive function that reveals sin by telling the truth “that is necessary for accountability, ethics, and liberation.” She asks that Lutherans not accept the “performative” function, however, due to the way it displays abusive images of God as one who terrorizes, humiliates, and even “beats us up.” Trelstad suggests that this language may be a result of Luther’s family background and a “reentrenchment into the very grounds he struggled to escape.” These images do not correspond to the God who revealed Godself in Jesus Christ, instead promoting a highly problematic relationship between God and humanity that violently impacts relationships between human beings (Trelstad 2015, pp. 216–21). Lutheran theologian Mary Streufert points to traditional interpretations of the cross with a similar concern about the implications of violence: “If our prime hermeneutic to understand the cross of Christ is through violent atonement, then violence can become our image and what we imitate.” Streufert offers a hermeneutic of maternal sacrifice, a “life-for-life model” that “turns Christians more strongly toward Jesus’ life as a potential locus of redemption.” While this hermeneutic is beyond the scope of this paper, I recognize the violent abuse that results from misapplications of atonement theories and non-contextually sensitive applications of law and gospel (Streufert 2006, pp. 65, 74). |
10 | There is much discussion surrounding the third use of the law. Wengert explains that it was added later to the first two uses by Melanchthon as a way to clearly separate Lutherans from antinomians and to help distinguish law from gospel. All commands, even those given particularly to Christians (e.g., Jn 13:34), are law and should not be confused with gospel, which is pure and unconditional promise. When this third use is preached well, Wengert proposes that it is heard not as a “condemning command but rather enticing invitation” from a good, loving, and gracious father to his beloved children. Using a memorable image, Wengert proposes that “unless people come out of church whistling,” the preacher is not preaching this use of the law and is instead burdening people with “one more thing to do to get right with God” (Wengert 2013, pp. 31, 37–40). |
11 | Or, in alignment with Trelstad, and with the understanding that the context is a worshipping congregation rooted in the gospel, Lutheran preachers might ask, “How God is working gospel-law-gospel on them and their people?” (Trelstad 2015, p. 209). |
12 | Because of this active way in which God’s Word works law and gospel on the hearers, theologian Gerhard Forde advises preachers to preach in a correspondingly active manner, to do what they hear happening in the text as they listen with this law and gospel hermeneutic: “Preaching is doing the text to the hearers. Doing the text, not merely explaining it (though that will be involved), not merely exegeting the text (though that is presupposed and indispensable), not merely describing or prescribing what Christians are supposed to do (though that will no doubt result). Preaching in a sacramental fashion is doing to the hearers what the text authorizes you to do to them.” What the text authorizes, he proposes, is that the preacher aims to do the “same thing in the present to the assembled hearers” as the text “actually did” (Forde 2017, pp. 91, 94). |
13 | I recognize that some readers might have concerns here and throughout the paper about the implications of this personal focus and its potential for an inwardness that forgets or ignores the neighbor. The personal and the social, however, are not mutually exclusive. The gospel is personally experienced in relationship in preaching (among and between preacher, congregation, and God in Christ by the power of the Holy Spirit). Moreover, the transforming power of the gospel is ideally what inspires, undergirds, nourishes, and guides Christians’ good work for justice in the world. Without attention given to the personal, good work may become disconnected from that which inspired it in the first place and be more difficult to sustain. Preaching law and gospel holds the potential both to honestly reveal that which has been done and left undone in this world and to offer forgiveness and a new identity oriented toward trust in Christ that frees Christians to turn toward their neighbor for whom Christ died. |
14 | Lest one be concerned about the power this gives the preacher, no such claim is made about anything else that a preacher might choose to proclaim. |
15 | This is not to negate the importance of acting on the implications of our faith but to properly label that action “law” and not “gospel,” not salvific, not having anything to do with our standing before God. The gospel is solely God’s action and not our action. If that distinction is not clear, the message of the gospel may be perplexing. Comparing preaching to the sacraments, Forde expresses concern that “what is said in the sermon is all too often quite at odds with what we do in the sacraments. If we give unconditionally in the sacraments we are likely to take it back or put conditions on it in the sermon and leave our people completely confused. We are likely to imply in our preaching that the gift is not really what it is cracked up to be so now they better get really serious” (Forde 2017, p. 89). This concern echoes throughout this tradition that holds fast to justification. As homiletician Shauna Hannan notes, Article Four of the Augsburg Confession, “Concerning Justification,” is the article by which the Lutheran church stands and falls (Hannan 2022, p. 45). |
16 | Meuser goes so far as to say that, for Luther, “nothing except Christ is to be preached—Christ as Savior, the one in whom God shows [God’s] own face, in whom God has done a once-for-all deed and spoken a one-for-all definitive word to the world” (Meuser 2006, p. 138). |
17 | Meuser expands upon Luther’s prioritization of the spoken word, quoting him saying, “The devil cares nothing about the written word, but where one speaks and preaches it, there he takes to flight” (Meuser 2006, p. 141). A particular person standing before others and proclaiming Christ to particular listeners holds a power that the written word alone does not have. |
18 | As Wengert puts it: “Yet apostles—and pastors and preachers are all apostles—have only one office, to bear witness to Christ crucified and risen again for the life of the world. That is all anyone has: God’s weakness in Christ is the believer’s strength” (Wengert 2013, p. 53; emphasis original). |
19 | Forde exhorts preachers dauntlessly to declare the sacramental nature of preaching: “The preacher has to have the audacity to believe that at the very moment of preaching is itself the sacrament, the audacity to claim that from all eternity God has been preparing for just this very moment and thus to say, ‘Here it is, it is for you!’ The preaching itself is the treasure, the sacramental moment” (Forde 2017, p. 97). |
20 | One of the major differences in the experience of reading versus being spoken to is that the latter engages more senses, which can create a richer and more holistic experience. Kolb notes Luther’s appreciation of the ways in which God graciously communicates God’s Word by addressing all human senses: “In 1538 [Luther] exulted that God graciously addresses the five human senses. Through the hand and tongue of the minister of the gospel God is at work. In baptism there is an oral word and a pourer, in the sacrament an oral word and a feeder, in preaching an oral word and a speaker, as in absolution” (Kolb 2009, p. 136). |
21 | Some of my teachers have said things in jest like, “What a ridiculous thing for you to be doing with your serious adult time…” or, “Are you breathing? Sometimes we stop breathing when someone asks us to do something strange like this.” These kinds of comments acknowledge discomfort in a way that gives people permission to laugh about it with the teacher. The laughter helps to break through the tension of the discomfort to a playful and fruitful freedom on the other side. |
22 | Students who want more intellectual verification that they are not wasting their time with these kinds of exercises can be pointed to embodied cognition science. For instance, see (Hrach 2021). |
23 | The professor who does the exercise with the students sees less of what the students are experiencing, and thus has less awareness of how an exercise is landing on a particular group of students. Leading while doing can also give a sometimes unhelpful impression of how the students “should” be experiencing a particular exercise. In more self-conscious groups, however, the professor’s participation can create room for students to engage with less self-consciousness because there is less attention on them from the professor. |
24 | Consider how the mere mention of delicious food can make one’s mouth water, and how thinking about a past incident, particularly an intense one, can bring all those heart-racing feelings physically rushing back to the body. The mind–body connection is so strong that the mind can move the body internally without external movement (and external movement can change the mind). |
25 | Due to the body’s connection with emotion, students sometimes experience strong feelings while practicing the exercises. This is generally not an issue and even a positive thing; feeling feelings is part of being human and a vital part of preaching (Childers 2006, pp. 229–30). If the experience is overwhelming to the student, however, the professor may provide contextually appropriate options depending on the nature of the group and the student. In a small group that has developed trust, the student may wish to share what is happening and then dive back in. In other instances, the student may wish to step to the side and journal while the rest of the class keeps going. |
26 | If students are synchronously online, the professor may invite them to have their cameras on and to be visible so that they can see how the exercise is landing and whether more or less time is needed for the exploration of movement. If the professor is recording for asynchronous students, they will want to leave space in the recording for that exploration. |
27 | This step is a common way to begin Linklater warmups. |
28 | This exercise was developed by internationally recognized voice teacher Kristin Linklater. I have come to know it as I do through repetition. I am writing from my own memory and with no authoritative written source. Undoubtedly, were Linklater to write this down, she would do so differently. The exercise is briefly described by homiletician Ruthanna Hooke here: (Hooke 2002, p. 13). |
29 | If students are synchronously online, students should instead be invited to have their cameras on and to be visible to their peers. Professors may wish to change the language “in this room” to “in this space” or another word that gives a sense that all are together even in their different rooms. I have recorded this exercise for asynchronous students and invited them to close their eyes and imagine the people in their preaching context during the “with all of you” section. |
30 | It is common for people to stop breathing or to breathe shallowly when they feel vulnerable, which is often the case when being asked to simply “be” while being seen by other people (rather than doing something that can draw their attention away from your being to the activity) in the way this exercise invites. Holding one’s breath is a way of disappearing from the room, of removing one’s presence. |
31 | Numbers 1-6 are a common sequence of stretches used by Designated Linklater Teacher Andrea Haring at the beginning of warmups. I have come to know it as I do through repetition. I am writing from my own memory and with no authoritative written source. Undoubtedly, were Haring to write this down, she would do so differently. Haring is the Executive Director of the Linklater Center for Voice and Language (see Haring 2024) and was my primary teacher on the path to becoming a Designated Linklater Teacher. If students are synchronously online, students may be invited to have their cameras on and to be visible, in addition to unmuting themselves, so that when the praying begins, there is a greater sense of praying together in unison rather than by themselves in their rooms. If recording for asynchronous students, the professor will want to leave space in the recording for the students to repeat each phrase. |
32 | This exercise was developed by movement teacher Merry Conway (see Conway 2011). I have come to know it as I do through repetition in her workshops. I am writing from my own memory and with no authoritative written source. Undoubtedly, were Conway to write this down, she would do so differently. I have added a few preaching reflections that she would not include, as her primary audience is actors. I let students know beforehand that they will want to dress in comfortable clothing that is easy to move around in for this exercise. If they are synchronously online, I invite them to create as much physical space for themselves in their room as possible for exploration. While I ask them to have their cameras on so that I can see how the exercise is landing and whether more or less time is needed for exploration, I acknowledge that they will likely be moving on and off screen throughout the exercise and that this is fine. I have not led this exercise asynchronously and question whether it would work well in that modality. The time spent in each section varies significantly with each group, making prerecording difficult. Additionally, the longer length of this exercise might be challenging for a student to sustain without the structure of a synchronous class. |
33 | It is common to spend a lot of time here in the United States, where value is assigned according to how busy and productive we are. We tend to notice our physical sensations only when something is “wrong,” such as when we are hungry, hot, cold, in pain, or nervous (manifested by held or shallow breath, an upset stomach, wobbly knees, sweaty palms, a racing heart, a dry mouth, or the like). |
34 | Class discussions can provide space for students to recognize that they are not the only person having a particular experience or the only person with a particular question. It can also reveal the very different ways that exercises can be experienced (e.g., one feels crushed by gravity’s weight, while another feels empowered by the way it grounds them). The vulnerability this kind of sharing requires often deepens relationships within the group, which is beneficial in a preaching classroom where students provide feedback on one another’s sermons. |
35 | I recognize that this sentence might sound odd. While Lutheranism is globally diverse, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America is the whitest denomination in the United States (Allende 2021). The student body of my institution is representative of that reality (though, crucially, it is not without diverse representation in other ways). Still, the Lutheran recognition of the law’s value and the need for it to be proclaimed, while refusing to let it overwhelm or deny the forgiveness and new life God is working through the proclamation of the gospel in the present tense, can encourage us to openly acknowledge the truth about the state of injustice in our guild and participate with hope in the redemption and new life God is bringing. Lutheranism’s for you-ness compels us to ensure as best we can that each particular “you” at our annual meetings, in our classrooms, and in our students’ ministries experiences the gospel “for you” and not “for someone else.” |
References
- Allende, Abraham D. 2021. The Church and Authentic Diversity. Living Lutheran. December 31. Available online: https://www.livinglutheran.org/2021/12/the-church-and-authentic-diversity/ (accessed on 17 February 2024).
- Articles & Essays. n.d. The Kristin Linklater Voice Centre. Available online: https://www.linklatervoice.com/resources/articles-essays (accessed on 26 January 2024).
- Bartow, Charles L. 1992. In Service to the Servants of the Word: Teaching Speech at Princeton Seminary. The Princeton Seminary Bulletin 13: 274–86. [Google Scholar]
- Bartow, Charles L. 1997. God’s Human Speech: A Practical Theology of Proclamation. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. [Google Scholar]
- Bayer, Oswald. 2006. Luther as Interpreter of Holy Scripture. In The Cambridge Companion to Martin Luther. Edited by Donald K. McKim. The Cambridge Companions to Philosophy, Religion and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 73–85. [Google Scholar]
- Brothers, Michael. 2014. Distance in Preaching: Room to Speak, Space to Listen. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. [Google Scholar]
- Childers, Jana. 1998. Performing the Word: Preaching as Theatre. Nashville: Abingdon. [Google Scholar]
- Childers, Jana. 2005. Making Connections: Preaching as Theatre. The Journal of Theology and Religion 4: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Childers, Jana. 2006. The Preacher’s Body. The Princeton Seminary Bulletin 27: 222–37. [Google Scholar]
- Childers, Jana, and Clayton J. Schmit, eds. 2008. Performance in Preaching: Bringing the Sermon to Life. Engaging Worship. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic. [Google Scholar]
- Conway, Merry. 2011. About. Merry Conway. Available online: https://www.merryconway.com/about-2/ (accessed on 21 February 2024).
- Earls, Aaron. 2021. Small Churches Continue Growing—But in Number, Not Size. Lifeway Research. October 20. Available online: https://research.lifeway.com/2021/10/20/small-churches-continue-growing-but-in-number-not-size/ (accessed on 1 January 2024).
- Forde, Gerhard O. 1990. Theology Is for Proclamation. Minneapolis: Fortress. [Google Scholar]
- Forde, Gerhard O. 2017. The Preached God: Proclamation in Word and Sacrament. Lutheran Quarterly Books. Minneapolis: Fortress. [Google Scholar]
- Gilmore, Samantha. 2022. Vulnerability and the Voice of the Preacher. Ph.D. dissertation, Princeton Theological Seminary, Princeton, NJ, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Gross, Nancy Lammers. 2017. Women’s Voices and the Practice of Preaching. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. [Google Scholar]
- Hannan, Shauna K. 2022. Preaching in the Lutheran Theological Family. In Preaching the Manifold Grace of God. Volume 1, Theologies of Preaching in Historical Theological Families. Edited by Ronald J. Allen. Eugene: Cascade, pp. 42–52. [Google Scholar]
- Haring, Andrea. 2024. Andrea Haring. The Linklater Center. Available online: https://www.thelinklatercenter.com/andrea-haring (accessed on 21 February 2024).
- Hooke, Ruthanna. 2002. “I Am Here in This Room…”: The Practice of Performance and the Learning of Preaching. Homiletic 27: 13–21. [Google Scholar]
- Hooke, Ruthanna. 2007. The Preacher’s Words and God’s Word: The Divine-Human Relationship in Preaching. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. [Google Scholar]
- Hooke, Ruthanna. 2010. Transforming Preaching. Transformations: The Episcopal Church in the 21st Century. New York: Church Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Hooke, Ruthanna. 2023. Sacramental Presence: An Embodied Theology of Preaching. Lanham: Lexington Books. [Google Scholar]
- Hrach, Susan. 2021. Minding Bodies: How Physical Space, Sensation, and Movement Affect Learning. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. Morgantown: West Virginia University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Kolb, Robert. 2009. One Little Word Can Slay Him: God’s Power and Presence in the Oral, Written, and Sacramental Forms of His Word. In Martin Luther: Confessor of the Faith. Christian Theology in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 131–51. [Google Scholar]
- Kolb, Robert. 2014. Luther’s Hermeneutics of Distinctions: Law and Gospel, Two Kinds of Righteousness, Two Realms, Freedom and Bondage. In The Oxford Handbook of Martin Luther’s Theology. Edited by Robert Kolb, Irene Dingel and L’ubomír Batka. Oxford Handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 168–84. [Google Scholar]
- Kolb, Robert, Timothy J. Wengert, and Charles P. Arand, eds. 2000. The Book of Concord: The Confessions of the Evangelical Lutheran Church. Charles P. Arand, Eric Gritsch, Robert Kolb, William Russell, James Schaaf, Jane Strohl, and Timothy J. Wengert, trans. Minneapolis: Fortress. [Google Scholar]
- Linklater, Kristin. 2006. Freeing the Natural Voice: Imagery and Art in the Practice of Voice and Language, Revised and Expanded ed. Hollywood: Drama Publishers. [Google Scholar]
- Luther, Martin. 1958. Against the Heavenly Prophets in the Matter of Images and Sacraments, 1525. In Luther’s Works: Church and Ministry II. Translated by Conrad Bergendoff. Luther’s Works. Philadelphia: Fortress, vol. 40. [Google Scholar]
- Luther, Martin, and Timothy J. Wengert. 2016. The Freedom of a Christian, 1520, The Annotated Luther Study ed. Minneapolis: Fortress. [Google Scholar]
- Meuser, Fred W. 2006. Luther as Preacher of the Word of God. In The Cambridge Companion to Martin Luther. Edited by Donald K. McKim. The Cambridge Companions to Philosophy, Religion and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 126–48. [Google Scholar]
- Potter, John. 2017. Small Congregations Share Strengths, Struggles. Living Lutheran. January 20. Available online: https://www.livinglutheran.org/2017/01/small-congregations-share-strengths-struggles/ (accessed on 17 February 2024).
- Stjerna, Kirsi. 2021. Lutheran Theology: A Grammar of Faith. New York: T&T Clark. [Google Scholar]
- Streufert, Mary J. 2006. Maternal Sacrifice as a Hermeneutics of the Cross. In Cross Examinations: Readings on the Meaning of the Cross Today. Edited by Marit Trelstad. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, pp. 63–75. [Google Scholar]
- Trelstad, Marit. 2015. Terror Begins at Home: Luther and the “Terrifying and Killing” Law. In Lutherrenaissance Past and Present. Edited by Christine Helmer and Bo Kristian Holm. Bristol: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, pp. 209–23. [Google Scholar]
- Ward, Richard F. 2008. Finding Voice in the Theological School. In Performance in Preaching: Bringing the Sermon to Life. Edited by Jana Childers and Clayton J. Schmit. Engaging Worship. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, pp. 139–52. [Google Scholar]
- Wengert, Timothy J. 2013. Reading the Bible with Martin Luther: An Introductory Guide. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic. [Google Scholar]
- Winderweedle, Jess. 2023. A Burning Queer Incandescence: The Prophetic Impact of Queer Presence in the Mainline Pulpit. Academy of Homiletics Workgroup Papers. Atlanta: Academy of Homiletics. [Google Scholar]
- Wingfield, Mark. 2022. Another Major Study Confirms: Most American Congregations Are Small, but Most Churchgoers Attend Large Congregations. Baptist News Global. March 17. Available online: https://baptistnews.com/article/another-major-study-confirms-most-american-congregations-are-small-but-most-churchgoers-attend-large-congregations/ (accessed on 1 January 2024).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gilmore, S. “Christ for You and Me”: A Lutheran Theology of Proclamation and the Presence of the Preacher. Religions 2024, 15, 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030272
Gilmore S. “Christ for You and Me”: A Lutheran Theology of Proclamation and the Presence of the Preacher. Religions. 2024; 15(3):272. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030272
Chicago/Turabian StyleGilmore, Samantha. 2024. "“Christ for You and Me”: A Lutheran Theology of Proclamation and the Presence of the Preacher" Religions 15, no. 3: 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030272
APA StyleGilmore, S. (2024). “Christ for You and Me”: A Lutheran Theology of Proclamation and the Presence of the Preacher. Religions, 15(3), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030272