The internal secularization of the feast of Saint Rosalia makes it clear that the change of the territory does not exclude the rite, but strengthens it. The ritual of the “feast” of Saint Rosalia, in fact, in 2006, moved overseas: to New York (Brooklyn).
The feast has always been celebrated in Brooklyn but it originally took place in the parish of the Sacred Hearts and St. Stephen’s Church in Carroll Gardens, which was Brooklyn’s first Italian parish. The procession originally involved followers walking barefoot through the streets of the neighbourhood to show their devotion to the saint. Since then, the festival has been moved to the Bensonhurst area where it has existed for seventy years.
The transformation of the territory takes place, informally, also in the New York area. In fact, the ritual transforms the territory through its presence.
The statue (inside the cart) donated to Sicilian-American devotees, was blessed and consecrated. The aim being to protect and support the community of devotees far from their homeland.
Therefore, this decision was taken by the municipality so that brings together in “faith in Saint Rosalia” the Palermitan immigrants who in the last century moved overseas, to America.
The triumphal cart of Saint Rosalia, icon of the “Festino” (little feast/festival) during the night of 14 July, landed at pier 85, on the Hudson River as a “gift” to Sicilian immigrants from municipality of Palermo. The chariot of the “little saint” represents the symbol of cultural identity but also of union between the two territories through the “ritual” of the festival.
The cart of Saint Rosalia, preserved in the Columbus Citizens Foundation in New York, represents not only an identity bond for immigrants but also a new form of ritualization on a new territory through an “ancient” ritual.
The chariot emphasizes not only the spiritual bond but also that of identity and solidarity between the two communities. In fact, for more than forty years, the Eighteenth Street in Bensonhurst is transformed to celebrate Saint Rosalia like the long Cassaro street in Palermo (via Vittorio Emanuele). Today, every year, the festival is very important for the Sicilian community of Brooklin. The devotees remember the connection with their territory, the “little cart of little saint” comes to a halt and the procession dissolves into an immense popular festival illuminated by an endless display of fireworks.
Over the years of research, I have been given various explanations for these questions. One of them interprets the devotion to the saint as a request for the protection of the city and its children. In another culture, the Saint Rosalia is sung in Italian, Shiva is sung in Hindi. Moreover, the sanctuary of Palermo’s patron saint has become a temple in which, for the Tamils, or for Sicilians who emigrated to America, Rosalia represents their divinity, their saint, the saint for all émigrés. In fact, for example, in the culture of the Tamil’s who emigrated—inside the cave, in the sanctuary on Mount Pellegrino, the central altar is dedicated to the “Virgin Mother of God”, the “Conception”: the Tamils find the “Great Mother” in her who protects marriage and children. In fact, Durga, in the Hindu religion, identified as Shiva’s wife, represents feminine energy, the “archetypal woman”, the dynamic element in the creation of the world. But for the Sicilian, she is “the” little saint—“santuzza” because this is the affectionate name for her. For all emigrants she is a sacred point of reference but also especially for women.
I connected those deep, embedded feelings, Americans, Hindus, Sicilians. Because as each migrant or refugee trying to reach Europe, or America in the last century, showing how one person’s dreams and ambitions are just as valid as the next person’s. Because we are all migrants on this Earth.
4.2. The Institutional-Religious Dimension: The Archiepiscopal Curia
The centrality of the archiepiscopal curia, rooted in the historical, political, and social context of the city of Palermo—the church in the territory—represents the first ‘institutional–religious’ dimension, which prevails during the festival through the diffusion of the religious programme prepared directly by the archiepiscopal curia’s press office. The organisation of the official programme in 1950 emphasised the arrangement of the liturgies and organisational details within a celebratory religious context, and shows its functionality during the days of the festival:
“… THE “FESTINO” Religious celebrations in honour of St. Rosalia;
(Giornale di Sicilia 8 July 1950)
2
The provisions issued in the press were an indispensable means of communication, all the more necessary since the new organisation of the festival was now entirely directed by the Church as an institution: in fact, the only one acceptable to the secular administration that, therefore, no longer had the qualifications to produce the festival on its own.
Moreover, in addition to the programme reported in the newspaper article, the route was also communicated by the ecclesiastical institution:
“… the procession will start at 6 p.m. on the same 15th day, moving from the Cathedral along Corso Vittorio Emanuele and Piazza Marina, and will proceed to the Church of the Gancia, where the clergy will lay down their sacred garments. The urn of the glorious relics of St. Rosalia will then proceed along the following streets: Via 4 Aprile (Church of the Gancia), Via Alloro, Piazza Pietravecchia, Via Divisi, Via Maqueda, Via Pergole, Piazza Carmine, Piazza Ballarò, Via Rimpetto, Piazza Casa Professa, Via Rua Formaggi, Via Castro, Via del Bastione, Piazza Vittoria, the Cathedral, accompanied by the parish clergy, local congregations, Associations of A.C. and Pious Sodalities of each parish through whose territory the procession will pass…”
(Giornale di Sicilia 13 July 1950)
This document amply reveals how the ecclesiastical institution shapes the festival of Saint Rosalia according to its own dynamic. In actual fact, the 19th century tradition of stopping in front of palaces was forbidden, as was the fear of the ‘viva!’ (the faithful shouted viva Saint Rosalia, meaning ‘long live Saint Rosalia!’) that characterised it.
Something decisive, however, did happen. With secularisation, which began in 1860, the festival of Saint Rosalia had to reinvent itself in a completely new dimension. The curia’s command over the organisation of the festival was also followed by a new rule, of ‘secondary sacralisation’, where any heterodox behaviour was unacceptable, and any move of the procession that focussed attention on anything other than God, was looked upon with suspicion and banned.
Thus, a particular way of accepting what has come to be known as the ‘institutional–popular’ dimension rooted in the cultural context of the city itself emerges, in which the people are the main actors and creators of the analysed phenomenon and who focus their attention on a playful folkloric and allegorical aspect that certainly does not reflect the canons of the religious rite and its institutional image. This calls for a certain type of behaviour from the faithful, with particular attention paid to the organisational aspect of the city, the organisation of the route of both the Festino (the big feast) and the religious rite, i.e., the route of the Argentea Urna. Moreover, the route chosen for the day of the Festino (the big feast) also created an almost hierarchical separation shown through the organisation of traffic. Here, we can distinguish some important characteristics that enable us to identify the differences inside the territory. It is the festivities committee and the provincial federation of merchants who publish, through the Giornale di Sicilia (Newspapers Sicily), the regulations concerning the route during the days of the festivities, the illumination of shops and streets, the road network and urban traffic regulations.
The festival in 1950 was characterised by the overpowering presence of the institutional–religious dimension, which spoke in the first person and spread its information through the press; it used the main means of communication, namely the Giornale di Sicilia (Newspapers Sicily), to spread its doctrine and induce the faithful to respect the religious ritual. First and foremost we should identify the three actors that made up the Festino (the big feast), who directed it and who changed it over the following years: the archiepiscopal curia, the institutional–religious dimension, representing the church in the territory; the municipality, the institutional–state dimension which represented the state; and the people, a central actor in both of the previous two dimensions, who made both the celebration of the religious rite, and the grandiosity and splendour of the Festino (the big feast), possible.
The presence of the two separate institutions, the municipality on the one hand and the archiepiscopal curia on the other, gave a greater value to the festivities, which had risked becoming exclusively popular and folkloristic without their direction.
As the triumphal procession with its chariot had long since disappeared, the only feature of the festivity that remained unchanged was the procession of the silver urn, which was no longer carried on the shoulders of the confraternity but pushed by hand, resting on a wooden box with wheels. It seemed that the procession had taken on a different image, compared to previous centuries, that of a popular walk, as the atmosphere of devotion seemed to be limited exclusively to the 15th, and the fact that the urn containing the relics was not carried on the shoulders almost made a mockery the image of the devotees themselves.
Rodo Santoro writes about the history of the festival during the 1950’s, from the post-war period onwards, claiming that:
“… Having lost any historical significance in the identity of Palermo, dulled if not outright mocked by those of the religious cult of the Santuzza, openly criticised by progressive culture, it seemed illogical, in the eyes of the general public, to propose once again such a script of démodé values… the new bourgeoisie, the true heirs of the boorish primordialism of the early 20th century, viewed this festival with ill-concealed hostility and ostentatious forbearance… all this in the fervent belief that it was run by priests for the benefit of the dominant political party, i.e., the Christian Democrats…”.
The decision to abandon the parade with the chariot, and its connection to the religious rite, did not seem to concern the people, who, devoted to tradition as well as to their saint, continued to be present on the festival days dedicated to her. In a newspaper article dated 14 July 1950 (although there is a printing error, in that it refers to the 15 July 1950), there is almost a ‘justification’ for the absence of the triumphal parade of the chariot, which had been so famous and the most important subject and object alongside the silver urn. It does not seem to be missed at all by the people, rather it was missing from the traditions during the festival days devoted to the patron saint. That the religious procession in those years completely replaced the parade and tried to force people to abandon a custom that for centuries had coexisted with the religious tradition of devotion to the saint.
The article gives us details of the ongoing conflict. On the one hand, the church institution, at the head of the organisational pyramid and with total responsibility, could not oversee components of the civil event that, in principle and tradition, did not belong to them. On the other hand, the civil institution, by now completely separated from a devotion that it learned to experience as external and superfluous to its conventional duties, no longer threw itself into the organisation of the chariot. This popular dimension then seems to explode and spread in the “Triunfi”: real altars of more modest dimensions, built within neighbourhoods.
With regard to the journey—the pilgrimage of devotion to Monte Pellegrino, which takes place in September—in 1950, we can find only one article testifying to its continuation:
“… journey to Monte Pellegrino: Every year, at this time, the people take the road to its mount, according to the ancient itinerary and with the same unchanging faith. The Santuzza awaits her day, in the serenity of her mountain; it is like an exchange…”.
During the years between 1958 and 1962, Italy enjoyed an economic miracle and, as a result, the entire population saw an increase in their purchasing power. In 1960, Sicily and at noon participated in the explosion of mass consumption, which marked not only the end of poverty, but a real leap in quality of life and changes to ways of living, with consequences on the organisation of social and family life and on the dominant cultural models.
The Festino (the big feast) of the second quarter of the 20th century appeared as a sort of remnant, an offshoot of the social customs of the population, and in the period between 1924 and 1973, this festival seemed to be a tradition to which only the people were devoted, but slowly a new awareness of the historical and cultural legitimacy of those values, which had been abandoned, grew.
In the 1960’s, the festivities held in the city of Palermo to honour the patron saint, Saint Rosalia, took on a devotional image that was concentrated above all on the day when her relics were carried through the city’s main streets:
“… Friday 15 July 1960: 11 a.m. Solemn Pontifical in the Greek Latin rite in the Cathedral officiated by Cardinal Ruffini and with the participation of the Municipality and city authorities…”.
The tone of such a document is quite clear and emphasises not only the presence of all the authorities at their highest levels, but also in naming (and thus investing with authority) various associations and, last but not least, in naming and emphasising the symbolically significant road network.
In the preceding days before the festivities, newspaper headlines reported a number of “crimes” that took place in the city of Palermo, which, however, did not hinder the organisation of the festival, and stopped once the Palermo police headquarters had intervened. The only change that took place concerned the illumination of the shops, which, during the previous festival, had not participated in the illumination of the streets through which the silver urn had passed. There is no clear explanation of the attitude adopted by the shopkeepers, and some news reports do not give a clear account of the reason for the change made to the days of festivity. However, these had not been reduced, as was the case in previous years, when they were cut to five days: from the 11th to the 15th. After all, the ceremony, having reached its full institutional dimension, had now assumed such importance that it was partially immune to news events.
4.3. The Institutional–State Dimension: The Municipality
The second dimension concerns the civil authority in 1960, which appears to have been reintegrated into the religious event. This obviously had an effect on the civil festivity, which was once again developed, according, however, to the tastes and forms of that decade.
During the festival days, concerts and attractions were held for the citizens, in addition to the illumination of the monuments and main villas. The first day of the festivities was held as part of the city’s thanksgiving to its saint, with a gift—a floral gesture—as well as official masses in the presence of church and political institutions, representing the city authorities. The last day of the
Festino was seen as the finale of the previous day’s events, with a manifestation of faith and devotion on the part of the population that had been missing in previous years, as reported:
“… the Festino 1960 has concluded—grandiose manifestation of popular faith in the return of the urn with the relics of Saint Rosalia … it would be better if the Festino kept a lower financial profile in the future …”.
The days of festivity had for years been marked by the disappearance of the ‘triumphal chariot’, which in the past had played its part in the organisation of the festival. The fear that devotion to the saint might be expressed during a moment characterised by folklore was the main argument for its disappearance. Concern on the part of the ecclesiastical institutions was compounded by concern on the part of the civil authorities about the cost of building a new chariot that needed to be changed every year. Hence the definitive elimination of the festivity that included pageantry and the triumphal chariot.
If previously the disappearance of the triumphal chariot had required no justification other than bad taste, now in the 1960s it was not bad taste that ruled the day, the detested ‘démodé’, as it was called in the 1950’s, but the lack of funds for its construction:
‘… The programme of the previous years was maintained as far as possible along the lines that the townspeople had shown they liked, and if it was necessary to sacrifice something important—and here we mean to refer to the Triumphal Chariot—this was due exclusively to those financial reasons which we have dealt with extensively during the presentation of the event and which can easily be identified in the lack of action from the Region, which has evidently decided to consider the “Festino” a tourist attraction to be staged in alternate years…’.
Unlike in previous years, the pilgrimage to Monte Pellegrino, which takes place annually in September, was mentioned several times in newspaper articles beginning on 2 September 1960 with the publication of the timetables and bus services to the mountain and those that arrived at its slopes; the organisation mentioned was the S.A.I.A.
In the days that followed, the pilgrimage wound its way up the mountain during the night of 3 September and, on 4 September, celebrations in honour of the patron saint’s were held in the presence of church authorities and city institutions:
“…is the festival of the Patron Saint—began the Archbishop—who continues through the centuries to be admired for her courage and the fortitude of spirit she showed. She wanted to abandon everything to do penance for sins she did not commit, to become her own mistress in a dominion governed by free will…”.
Historically, after 1963, signs of economic and social instability began to appear in Italy. However, the 1960s and early 1970s were characterised by a growth in mass consumption and the expansion of public spending on education, pensions, and insurance. The whole of Italy, including Sicily, was swept up in the famous hot autumn, in which students occupied universities in order to obtain an extension of the right to study and a more modern and critical approach to university teaching. In fact, this cultural temperament resulted in the institutions being criticised and the legacies of religious traditions being questioned, especially those coming from the devotional sphere.
However, the phenomenon that had the greatest impact on the Sicilian economy, and which condemned it to both bad politics and bad economics for decades, was the quantum leap made by the Sicilian mafia in the 1960s and 1970s.
The seventies were the years in which an attempt was made to restore the traditional image of the Festino, which had been neglected over the previous centuries, and which had brought many foreign travellers to the city, not only to admire the event, but also to broaden their knowledge of Palermo’s traditions. Moreover, interest in the historical recovery and tradition of the Festino, including the re-introduction of the triumphal chariot dedicated to the saint during the festival days, was not opposed by local or ecclesiastical institutions. The latter saw the introduction of the chariot as a sense of belonging to the place and not a threat to what was seen as the real religious procession.
The 1971, only carried a few articles concerning the festival: on 13 July 1970, in which an article reports on the festivities going back to 1871, one hundred years earlier, narrating the traditions and history of the beginning of the festivities in honour of the saint; on 14 July, in which the folkloristic and tourist aspect of the festivity was highlighted, as was the disappointment of the people of Palermo at the non-participation of the ‘Majorette de Lyon’ dance troupe and who witnessed a disappointing festival, at least according to the article’s author, because of a second-rate solution adopted by the organisers. In September of the same year, only one article in the Newspapers of Sicily (Giornale di Sicilia) reported on the pilgrimage to Monte Pellegrino, introducing on this date, in addition to the dies natalis of the saint, distractions such as folkloristic games, fireworks and a theatre show.
The July festivities in 1971, which had been described by the people of Palermo as disappointing and lacking in excitement, sought to revive the festival by implementing a new type of celebration on Monte Pellegrino, which for centuries had been a place of pilgrimage, prayer and devotion far away from the chaos of the city.
An interest in history and one’s own region, and the search for the city’s historical identity, were the predominant research elements of the early 1970s. Rodo Santoro was commissioned by the local administration to study the history of ancient festivals and to identify the basic characteristics of this centuries-old celebration. He wrote:
“…a special commission was set up by the municipal administration to study the possibility of reinstating the ancient ceremonials of the Festino but no one realised what it really meant to revive this festival that for more than a century has been emptied of meaning and had suffered great ethical-symbolic impoverishment. That commission drew up an outline of the civil celebration that was to be developed in conjunction with the religious one…”.
The elements that had gradually disappeared over the decades were easily identifiable: on the one hand, the triumphal chariot, with its senatorial chariot, and on the other, the presence and participation of the confraternities with their vara (singular: vara, plural: vares—triumphal chariot in Sicilian dialect) of saints during the religious procession.
The participation of both secular and religious institutions was fundamental to the restoration of the festival tradition; not only the local political institutions, representing the city authorities, but also the archiepiscopal curia, which sought to specifically control the tradition of Catholic culture by reintroducing all the city’s confraternities with their traditional garments and their vares.
What appears is more than just a ‘comatose state’, it was the difficulty encountered by the church in guiding a symbolic and expressive patrimony in an era that was by now profoundly disenchanted and rationalised with the full knowledge that from an anthropological analysis it was a simple cultural symbol, while religious representation constituted a structuring element on the level of shared emotions.
The year 1974 was the three hundred and fiftieth anniversary of the discovery of the saint’s remains, and on this occasion the festivities were organised differently from previous years; the most important element being the reawakening of the historical culture of the people of Palermo. It was in this year that the deus machina, a characteristic symbol of the festivities between the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, was reintroduced, and hence the design of the triumphal chariot was altered.
From a religious point of view, the most important event remains that on 15 July when the relics contained in the argentea urna are transported, but with the reintroduction of the
deus machina chariot in the 1970s, it appears that these two forms of celebration in honour of the patron saint had come together at a certain point, since:
“…the last float, with a swarm of the Santuzza’s faithful behind it, who were literally clinging to the float, having mistaken it for a devotional vara…”.
The nineteen eighties were characterised by a period when particular attention was paid by municipal administrations to the celebrations of the Festino in July. The changes that characterised that decade included participation of acrobatic tightrope walkers from the equestrian circus and other types of entertainment, which were added to the traditional display of the triumphal chariot. Alongside these changes that marked the profane procession, the religious procession was impoverished by the pomp of the preceding days; but the religious institution of the archiepiscopal curia did not oppose the choices made by the council for the days preceding 15 of July, peacefully dividing the territorial and temporal space.
The 1980 Festino (the big feast) was characterised by the inclusion of more theatrical and folkloristic elements than in previous years, which through the theatrical performances usually held at Monte di Pietà, tell the story of the popular tradition which embodies the life of the patron saint.
The restoration of the traditions, customs and costumes that characterised that year’s festivity was met with much controversy, and was not accepted by the entire population. Strange, given the fact that it had always been created by the people, for the people and for their saint.
Moreover, the controversies and disagreements that occurred that year involved various sectors of the social, economic and cultural spheres: there were economic and social problems, especially in terms of the organisation of the festival, which had involved only a part of the citizenry.
The article published in the
Cronaca di Palermo, dated 12 July 1980, describes tensions between the religious sphere and the secular–popular sphere:
“… if only in 1974 they hadn’t attempted, with some success, to transform the Festino into a major event …”.
The poor turnout at the 1980
Festino, despite the folkloristic and theatrical attractions that were supposed to have the opposite effect, prompted Cardinal Pappalardo’s request to the municipal and regional administrators to intervene:
“… For Cardinal Pappalardo the Festino was an opportunity for a political warning to the city’s administrators…”.
The archiepiscopal curia’s message to the administrative and local politicians on the problems faced by the citizens during the days of the festivities in honour of Saint Rosalia, highlighted the importance of supervision by both civil and religious institutions on the subject of the Festino.
The Eucharistic celebration that takes place at the Palace of the Eagles, which sees the presence and performance of a religious function–ritual within a civic palace, the seat of a political institution, endorses within a festive context the union of the religious and civil spheres that have a single centre: Saint Rosalia.
Cardinal Pappalardo’s sermon during the Eucharistic celebration at the Palazzo delle Aquile is highlighted in an article dated 14 July 1980, the day on which the ‘pagan’ festival closes:
‘… in highlighting, first and foremost, the place that Saint Rosalia occupies in the religious sentiment of the people of Palermo, he said that the festival in honour of the patron saint must be an ‘occasion’ to encourage a search for the true values of life and a meditation on Christian virtues…’.
The religious significance of the festival in honour of Saint Rosalia, on 15 July 1980, is highlighted in the sermon given by Cardinal Pappalardo during mass, a Eucharistic celebration held in the cathedral, in front of both civil and political institutions, and citizens. In the speech made by the Cardinal, multiple themes were touched upon in a context that encompassed the celebration of the patron saint alongside the indifference on the part of the bourgeoisie towards the problems that had struck the ‘old’ city, the historic centre: the religious value that 15 July had assumed, despite the controversy that had followed the festival organisers in the preceding days and the absence of people from the Festino, seems to have disappeared into a silence created by respect and devotion in front of the procession of the silver urn containing the relics of the patron saint that was attended by fifty thousand people.
Cardinal Pappalardo, who took to the stage, which was built every year in Piazza Marina, urged the people to extol their patron saint as a spiritual value, imitating her in her strength of will and discerning her from all other endeavours because:
“… Rosalia is not interested in tourists or foreigners attracted by this or that folkloristic performance of the festival, this may be of interest to the Tourist Board or the Department of Tourism, or it may be an aid to the city’s economy…”.
The anniversary of the dies natalis of the patron saint of Palermo, on the 4 September each year, and the religious festival the day after on the 15 July, was experienced by the people in a more secular way in 1980 than in previous decades. The pilgrimage was experienced differently, it varied spiritually for each individual, it was accomplished in different ways: by bus, by car and, more traditionally, on foot.
A comparison made between today and the past, of the different means used to ascend to the top of Monte Pellegrino, highlights clear differences for, in the past, the religious devotion shown by the faithful was stronger. They climbed barefoot to the sanctuary and miracles and devotions were more frequent. Today the religious value of the festival has waned over the centuries, with traces of faith and tradition mixed with a form of secularism that touches on the sacred, uniting the meaning of the pilgrimage with the air of a picnic; as if the faithful were less devoted than in previous pilgrimages.
At the end of the 1980s, profound political transformations were taking place. Italy, which for fifty years had had the strongest communist party in the West, now had to deal with a Soviet communism that had been defeated. The traditional restrictions used in the Italian political system, which had prevented changes in government, were thrown into crisis; they were no longer necessary. The electorate, which had always voted for the same parties, had shown itself resistant to corruption, and the Mafia’s involvement in politics that had emerged from somewhere was now liberated.
The presence of organised crime, which has marked the Sicilian territory for centuries, involving every social and economic aspect, was strongly reflected in the organisation of the Festino in honour of Saint Rosalia, patron saint of the city of Palermo, at the end of the 20th century. For the city, 1990 marked a period in which inequality was present in various sectors: society, the economy, which was affected by organised crime, and the culture of the Festino itself.
The organisation of the Festino was no different compared to the previous decade, as the same triumphal chariot was used with the musicians playing inside the great vessel and, as every year, the celebration of the procession saw the participation of political institutions marked by the holding of a Eucharistic celebration at the Palace of the Eagles, together with representatives of the city administration and the archbishop’s curia. In addition, Cardinal Pappalardo’s stance towards the local political institutions marked a form of involvement by the religious institutions in the city’s civic administration. It was an intervention that did not preclude any side, but which nonetheless uncovered the problem of a necessary connection between religious and civic values.
The religious procession of 15 July 1990 was reported on in an article in the Giornale di Sicilia, “The procession of the Urn of the Santuzza (little saint) will close the Festino’, which describes the final route of the silver urn that traditionally passes through: … via Vittorio Emanuele, Via Butera, Via Lincoln, Corso Tukory, Via Cadorna, Via Castro, Piazza Indipendenza, Porta Nuova to return to its starting point in front of the cathedral…”.
On 16 July 1990, the Giornale di Sicilia carried a report entitled: ‘What does the Festino taste like now?—Palermo. Saint Rosalia: those who criticise, those who regret, those who enjoy themselves, but everyone eats’. The controversy over traditional food customs, or those that characterised the tradition of the Festino, and the behaviour of the people in the days leading up to the religious festival, designated as devotional and spiritual, became more and more explicit.
In the month of September 1990, the customary pilgrimage to the sanctuary of Monte Pellegrino, which takes place on the night of the 3rd to the 4th, was marked not only by a spiritual and devotional message on the dies natalis of the patron saint but, alongside this and on the same days, a social and political message was given through the organisation of a torchlight procession against the Mafia’s killing of general prefect Carlo Alberto dalla Chiesa, his wife Emanuela Setti Carraro, and police protection officer Domenico Russo, that had taken place in Palermo eight years eariler.
The official moment on 4 September, was when a mass in honour of Saint Rosalia was celebrated in the square in front of the sanctuary was attended by political and military institutions as well as a crowd of the faithful. The pilgrimage to the sanctuary began the night before via the old road, and from the first light of dawn masses were celebrated, welcoming the arrival of the faithful who gave thanks through the pilgrimage by bringing ex-votos, which were offered to the saint.
The cooperation of the municipality was very important. It arranged for the closing and opening of certain roads, needed to reach Monte Pellegrino, together with bus services provided by AMAT, which also offered integrated bus and metro services. The organisation of the city, roads and means of communication to reach the slopes of Monte Pellegrino were of primary importance to facilitate the smooth flow of traffic involving cars and citizens.
Devotion to the patron saint, therefore, requires close cooperation between political–civil and religious institutions, as the pilgrimage is a phenomenon that attracts more and more devotees every year. The pilgrimage on foot that takes place during the night of 3 September, along the old road leading to the sanctuary of Saint Rosalia, gathers many stories of faith and ‘hope’ from pilgrims who bring prayers and ex-votos.
In Palermo, the decade from 1990 to 2000 was marked by crimes that shocked both the entire population of the city and the entire nation. In 1992, the Mafia’s terrorist assault on the balance of power between politics and the institutions reached a tragic climax. The ‘black’ period in Sicilian society began in 1990 with the murder of judge Rosario Livatino and continued in March 1992, when the honourable Salvo Lima, a member of the Sicilian Christian Democratic Party, was killed. In 1986, the Maxi Trial had begun against dozens of Mafia defendants, leading to a series of convictions. It is believed that the hon. Salvo Lima had promised to ‘settle’ the trial, and his death has an enormous symbolic significance:
“… the mafia kills the man who is indicated by numerous testimonies as the mediator between the mafia itself and the political system of government […] as if the system of mediation between the mafia and politics had been compromised in its reliability and how it functions…”.
In 1992, the clash between the Mafia and the state had reached its limit: in the spring of ‘92, the Cosa Nostra decided to kill the two high profile magistrates who most publicly had fought to eliminate mafia crime in the city of Palermo.
The two judges, Giovanni Falcone and Paolo Borsellino, were commemorated in the
Festino of 1992 through a torchlight procession that replaced the traditional fireworks that have always marked the closing of the festivities in honour of Saint Rosalia; and again in the
Festino of 2007, which was entirely dedicated to the massacres carried out by the Mafia. On 18 July 1993, the Newspapers of Sicily (
Giornale di Sicilia) dedicated its
Italian Chronicles to all the crimes committed by mafia organisations against the state and against Italian justice:
“… 19 July 1992: almost two months after the motorway massacre, Palermo is a theatre of war. The Mafia kills a troublesome Judge in front of his mother’s house: a car bomb rips apart the magistrate and five protection officers. A terrible roar and all hell breaks loose in Via D’Amelio, as it did in Capaci…”.
This is the headline that starts the article entirely dedicated to massacres by the Mafia, precisely a year after the event, and published after the 1993 Festino celebrations. This deeply rooted evil in Sicilian society was also recalled on that occasion.
I feel it is my duty to mention 1992, a year in which the celebrations of the patron saint took on multiple values: devotional, spiritual, and under the banner of justice, and the dignity of the human being. An article in the Giornale di Sicilia dated July 1993 reports on the two sad events that shook the whole of society, to ensure they are not forgotten:
“… the echo of the massacre that took place along the Capaci motorway on the afternoon of 23 May 1992 was still in the air, reverberating. And while in their offices the investigators in Palermo continue to try to make sense of the massacre, which cost the lives of the Judge Giovanni Falcone, his wife (Francesca Morvillo) and the three police protection officers, on 19 July another tremendous explosion rips through the Sicilian capital. The explosion takes place in Via Mariano D’Amelio, shortly before 5 p.m. On that accursed Sunday, six members of the anti-Mafia die: judge Paolo Borsellino, deputy prosecutor of the court of Palermo, and five police protection officers”.
At the 1992
Festino, the importance of putting on a public show of visibility and cohesion between the religious institution, Cardinal Pappalardo, and the political institution, represented by first citizen Aldo Rizzo before of the city was fundamental:
“… Palermo cannot be abandoned to its fate. Solidarity built only on words is not enough: what is at stake is the destiny of a city, which does not want to live with an enemy, the Mafia, which day after day massacres our freedoms, destroys our lives, and takes any hope of redemption…”.
Saint Rosalia represented, both on the festival days from 10 to 15 July 1992 and on the days of the pilgrimage, 3 and 4 September 1992, a container of hope, of faith, of protection for the city from the crimes that took place that year; as well as a ‘vessel’ on which to place, even if only symbolically, under the statue representing the saint on the triumphal chariot: expectations, desires, regrets, bitterness, to drive away human cruelty and the scourge that, like the plague centuries before, hung over the city. And it is precisely at the 2007 Festino, which sees the mafia massacres and organised crime as a plague, remembered and symbolically carried along the route taken by the triumphal chariot, that the latter becomes a symbol.
In the aftermath of the 1992 massacres, Palermo’s political and social climate changed: an image was presented to the public of internal cohesion and determination to eradicate the organised crime that had characterised the area for centuries. Two major channels of youth socialisation were mobilised: schools of all levels and parishes in the diocese of Palermo. Teachers took young people to anti-Mafia demonstrations, to show that the desire to change society must start from the young, from the new generations. In the church, contrary to a long tradition, voices of dissent from Mafia dominance were being voiced. Alongside the oratory of a section of the clergy, however, the silent example of priest from one of the neighbourhoods where the Mafia was most deeply rooted, who was murdered by those who did not like his commitment towards eradicating the Mafia, remains: Father Pino Puglisi.
In an environment almost devoid of civic tradition, an anti-Mafia movement was born, organising and involving individuals and entire families in demonstrations.
The symbolism and evocation of Saint Rosalia’s life, (the miracles, the courage, the constant propensity to seek a righteous path towards one’s faith), characterise the total devotion of the people of Palermo towards their ‘Santuzza’, as she is called by all. The future must be thought of in terms of economic development and cultural and civil growth together, in which expressions such as culture, tradition, customs, the fight against organised crime and the “Festino” are intwined and trace a path. The rite—religious, secular, and profane myths of the festivities in honour of Saint Rosalia—brings together a multifaceted vision of Palermo society in an area that is constantly changing.