“Leading Many Sons to Glory”: Historical Implications of Exclusive Language in the Epistle to the Hebrews
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Overall, I agree with the clear argument presented in this article, and generally, I agree with the presentation of evidence (though I do wonder if the presentation of Philo's views is not a bit selective, given his rather troubling comments about women elsewhere).
Some additional evidence that might strengthen the author's point:
- The author uses "ancestors/forefathers" (οἱ πατέρες) quite often, and in Hebrews 11, this term clearly refers to the list of people with women included (strengthening the author's suggestion that the author intends various terms to be inclusive).
- Paul extends inheritance to women explicitly in 2 Cor 6:19, perhaps suggesting that early Christian authors agreed with the general practice of inclusion.
- The familial imagery found in the first major section of Hebrews highlights the "home" as a space that is valued within the community (see, e.g., Peeler, You Are My Son).
Author Response
Thank you for your careful reading and support for this essay. I found your suggestions very helpful and have integrated them into the essay.
Reviewer 2 Report
This is part an important argument from silence but more than that it reads the silence in a context in the light of which it speaks. The author sees no need to put women in any way in their place, that is, impose or imply limits on them. In contrast to other NT writings this must carry weight and I think the essay makes this case well. It is a valid argument and well articulated.
Author Response
Thank you for taking time to read this essay. I appreciate that you acknowledge both that this is an argument from silence but also that I seek to make the argument in light of historical context. I am encouraged by your assessment.
