Next Article in Journal
A Case Presenting with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder and Infectious Polyradiculitis Following BNT162b2 Vaccination and COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
Vaccine Hesitancy during the Coronavirus Pandemic in South Tyrol, Italy: Linguistic Correlates in a Representative Cross-Sectional Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Fear of Illness and Convenient Access to Vaccines Appear to Be the Missing Keys to Successful Vaccination Campaigns: Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Decisions of Hospital Staff in Poland concerning Vaccination against Influenza and COVID-19
Previous Article in Special Issue
COVID-19 Vaccination and Ukrainian Refugees in Poland during Russian–Ukrainian War—Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Vaccine and Vaccination: On Field Research

by
Francesca Gallè
1,* and
Christian Napoli
2
1
Department of Movement Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Via Medina n. 40, 80133 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Medical Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Via di Grottarossa 1035/1039, 00189 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2022, 10(7), 1027; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10071027
Submission received: 6 June 2022 / Revised: 9 June 2022 / Accepted: 10 June 2022 / Published: 27 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vaccine and Vaccination: On Field Research)

1. Background

Historically, vaccinations have enabled the eradication, elimination, and control of many debilitating diseases. In 2020, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the scientific community started working tirelessly on the development of an appropriate vaccine, highlighting the importance of vaccination as a powerful life-saving weapon in the fight against infectious diseases. However, despite the real danger that infectious diseases pose to health and the proven historical importance of vaccines, informed adherence to vaccination is currently significantly undervalued in common perception. Compulsory immunization plans must be accompanied by effective education and information strategies, paying attention to the spread of data not supported by scientific evidence. In this context, this Special Issue, “Vaccines and Vaccination: On Field Research”, has the main objective of increasing the evidence and observations of the international literature concerning (i) vaccine epidemiology, (ii) vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, (iii) and immunization strategies aimed at improving vaccination coverage through education and communication campaigns for both health professionals and the general population.
In recent centuries, since their development, vaccinations have enabled the eradication of smallpox, drastically reduced the incidence of debilitating diseases such as polio and measles, and even prevented the onset of certain noncommunicable diseases, including liver and cervical cancer, thereby helping to increase the life expectancy of the world’s population [1]. Recently, the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed a humanitarian crisis marked by significant health, psychological, and economic pressures that exposed the vulnerability of institutional, scientific, and health systems worldwide. Seeking a prompt response to the pandemic emergency, in 2020 public health, alongside global health, authorities moved swiftly to coordinate numerous clinical trial projects seeking vaccine candidates against SARS-CoV-2. Besides the development of effective therapies and tools to identify infected individuals, an important part of the scientific community worked tirelessly on the development of an appropriate vaccine [2]. In fact, the COVID-19 pandemic has been a reminder of the importance of vaccination as a powerful life-saving weapon in the fight against infectious diseases.
However, despite the real danger that infectious diseases pose to health and the proven historical importance of vaccines, informed adherence to vaccination is currently significantly undervalued in common perception [3]. In this context, altered perceptions of health risks have a significant impact on the health decisions taken by the population. In fact, the discrepancy between the real danger and the perceived risk can lead to inappropriate behavior that does not comply with the public health measures recommended for both the general population and at-risk cohorts, such as healthcare workers in both hospital and community settings [3,4,5]. Additionally, where sufficient levels of knowledge about COVID-19 characteristics and prevention are demonstrated, effective warnings and messages issued by public health communicators seem to be still necessary [6]. Indeed, since people no longer experience those infectious diseases that have been reduced or eliminated through vaccination, many individuals do not perceive the need to immunize themselves and their children, thus increasing their possibility of contracting natural diseases and developing related sequelae [7]. In a world characterized by global movements of populations, this problem is even more important [8,9].
In particular, the widely known phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy, described in 2019 as one of the ten greatest threats to global health by the World Health Organization, has also affected COVID-19 vaccination, hindering the attainment of the desired vaccination coverage, sometimes even in hospital settings. Indeed, in the health and social care setting, healthcare workers (HCWs) are not exempt from the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy, which is worrying considering that the lack of awareness of the importance of vaccination in this cohort of individuals conflicts with the principles on which the healthcare profession’s mission is founded [10].
Different studies have demonstrated a high level of acceptance towards COVID-19 vaccination and a good level of knowledge regarding vaccine characteristics in the general population. Moreover, knowledge and vaccine acceptance were found to be correlated [11]. After the occurrence of COVID-19 vaccine complications, peoples’ perceptions of vaccine negative health consequences increased. At the same time, surprisingly, the acceptance of COVID-19 vaccination also increased significantly, probably due to the fact that at the beginning of the COVID vaccination campaign people were more worried about COVID-19 than about the possible adverse effects of vaccination [11]. However, later, after the mandatory implementation of the green pass, a lower vaccine acceptance was registered, suggesting that compulsory immunization plans must be accompanied by effective education and information strategies, paying attention to the spread of data not supported by scientific evidence [12]. In this context, healthcare personnel play a crucial role, since they can tailor communication to those categories who were shown to be more hesitant.
Moreover, in a landscape in which a sense of suspicion and mistrust towards vaccinations and health institutions has grown, the traditional counter tools have been shown to be ineffective. This is further amplified today by the ease with which information can be spread, thanks to new media and social networks [10,13].
In particular, during the current pandemic, continuous media exposure to a huge volume of seemingly conflicting news (an infodemic) made it difficult for inexperienced users to find reliable sources of information [14].
Given the potential of technology in information-seeking processes, the use of online channels by healthcare institutions could be a valuable tool for divulging medical and scientific knowledge to citizens [14]. International and national health authorities as well as agencies must collaborate in adopting these measures in order to guide the population towards consciously chosen decisions.

2. Conclusions

This Special Issue, “Vaccines and Vaccination: On Field Research”, has the main objective of increasing the evidence and observations of the international literature concerning (i) vaccine epidemiology, (ii) the phenomenon of vaccine hesitancy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance, and (iii) the adoption of vaccination strategies in order to improve vaccination coverage of the population through health activities, education, and communication campaigns for both the general public and health professionals. To this end, original articles, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, short communications, commentaries, or other types of articles on vaccines administered in all cohorts of the population (infants, adolescents, adults, elderly people, and at-risk populations) as well as strategies adopted to promote vaccination adherence among these categories are welcomed and encouraged for this Special Issue.

Author Contributions

F.G. and C.N. contributed equally to this paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dettori, M.; Arghittu, A.; Castiglia, P. Knowledge and Behaviours towards Immunisation Programmes: Vaccine Hesitancy during the COVID-19 Pandemic Era. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Who.int. 2021. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 5 June 2022).
  3. Dettori, M.; Arghittu, A.; Deiana, G.; Azara, A.; Masia, M.D.; Palmieri, A.; Spano, A.L.; Serra, A.; Castiglia, P. Influenza Vaccination Strategies in Healthcare Workers: A Cohort Study (2018–2021) in an Italian University Hospital. Vaccines 2021, 9, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Caggiano, G.; Napoli, C.; Coretti, C.; Lovero, G.; Scarafile, G.; De Giglio, O.; Montagna, M.T. Mold contamination in a controlled hospital environment: A 3-year surveillance in southern Italy. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Masia, M.D.; Dettori, M.; Deriu, G.M.; Soddu, S.; Deriu, M.; Arghittu, A.; Azara, A.; Castiglia, P. Microbial Monitoring as a Tool for Preventing Infectious Risk in the Operating Room: Results of 10 Years of Activity. Atmosphere 2021, 12, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gallè, F.; Sabella, E.A.; Roma, P.; Ferracuti, S.; Da Molin, G.; Diella, G.; Montagna, M.T.; Orsi, G.B.; Liguori, G.; Napoli, C. Knowledge and Lifestyle Behaviors Related to COVID-19 Pandemic in People over 65 Years Old from Southern Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Sabbatucci, M.; Odone, A.; Signorelli, C.; Siddu, A.; Maraglino, F.; Rezza, G. Improved Temporal Trends of Vaccination Coverage Rates in Childhood after the Mandatory Vaccination Act, Italy 2014–2019. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 2540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Napoli, C.; Riccardo, F.; Declich, S.; Dente, M.G.; Pompa, M.G.; Rizzo, C.; Rota, M.C.; Bella, A.; National Working Group. An early warning system based on syndromic surveillance to detect potential health emergencies among migrants: Results of a two-year experience in Italy. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 8529–8541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Napoli, C.; Dente, M.G.; Kärki, T.; Riccardo, F.; Rossi, P.; Declich, S. Network for the Control of Cross-Border Health Threats in the Mediterranean Basin and Black Sea. Screening for Infectious Diseases among Newly Arrived Migrants: Experiences and Practices in Non-EU Countries of the Mediterranean Basin and Black Sea. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 15550–15558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Arghittu, A.; Dettori, M.; Azara, A.; Gentili, D.; Serra, A.; Contu, B.; Castiglia, P. Flu Vaccination Attitudes, Behaviours, and Knowledge among Health Workers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gallè, F.; Sabella, E.A.; Roma, P.; De Giglio, O.; Caggiano, G.; Tafuri, S.; Da Molin, G.; Ferracuti, S.; Montagna, M.T.; Liguori, G.; et al. Knowledge and Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination among Undergraduate Students from Central and Southern Italy. Vaccines 2021, 9, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Gallè, F.; Sabella, E.A.; Roma, P.; Da Molin, G.; Diella, G.; Montagna, M.T.; Ferracuti, S.; Liguori, G.; Orsi, G.B.; Napoli, C. Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination in the Elderly: A Cross-Sectional Study in Southern Italy. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Arghittu, A.; Dettori, M.; Dempsey, E.; Deiana, G.; Angelini, C.; Bechini, A.; Bertoni, C.; Boccalini, S.; Bonanni, P.; Cinquetti, S.; et al. Health Communication in COVID-19 Era: Experiences from the Italian VaccinarSì Network Websites. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Limaye, R.J.; Sauer, M.; Ali, J.; Bernstein, J.; Wahl, B.; Barnhill, A.; Labrique, A. Building trust while influencing online COVID-19 content in the social media world. Lancet Digit. Health 2020, 2, e277–e278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gallè, F.; Napoli, C. Vaccine and Vaccination: On Field Research. Vaccines 2022, 10, 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10071027

AMA Style

Gallè F, Napoli C. Vaccine and Vaccination: On Field Research. Vaccines. 2022; 10(7):1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10071027

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gallè, Francesca, and Christian Napoli. 2022. "Vaccine and Vaccination: On Field Research" Vaccines 10, no. 7: 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10071027

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop