Next Article in Journal
Antioxidative and Cytoprotective Efficacy of Ethanolic Extracted Cranberry Pomace against Salmonella Enteritidis Infection in Chicken Liver Cells
Previous Article in Journal
CHIP Haploinsufficiency Exacerbates Hepatic Steatosis via Enhanced TXNIP Expression and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Responses
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 12
Issue 2
10.3390/antiox12020459
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of Antioxidant Capacity and Muscle Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Composition of Nervous and Calm Hu Sheep

by
Jinying Zhang
1,
Yifan Zhang
1,
Jiasheng Wang
1,
Hengyu Jin
1,
Shuhan Qian
1,
Peigen Chen
1,
Mengzhi Wang
1,*,
Ning Chen
2,* and
Luoyang Ding
1,*
1
College of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China
2
State Key Laboratory for Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural and Reclamation Science, Shihezi 832061, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2023, 12(2), 459; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020459
Submission received: 2 January 2023 / Revised: 8 February 2023 / Accepted: 8 February 2023 / Published: 11 February 2023
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study determined the effect of temperament on antioxidant capacity and the relationship between antioxidant capacity and the contents of amino acids (AA) and fatty acids (FA) in muscle of Hu sheep. Organ and muscle samples of five calm and five nervous Hu sheep were collected to determine the antioxidant capacity and the contents of AA and FA in muscle tissue. The concentrations of malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide excretion enzyme (SOD) in muscle and intestinal tissue of calm Hu sheep were lower than those of nervous Hu sheep (p < 0.01), and the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) in liver of calm Hu sheep was significantly higher than that of nervous Hu sheep (p = 0.050). The content of AA of calm Hu sheep was higher than that of nervous Hu sheep, especially the content of reductive amino acids, which was significantly higher than that of nervous Hu sheep (p = 0.029). Fatty acid content of nervous Hu sheep was higher than that of calm type, and saturated fatty acid content was significantly higher than that of calm type (p = 0.001). The SOD content in muscle tissue was positively correlated with the contents of aspartic acid (Asp), alanine (Ala) and lysine (Lys). Catalase (CAT) activity was positively correlated with Ala content. There was a significant positive correlation between total antioxidants (T-AOC) and glutamate (Glu) (p < 0.05). MDA concentration was positively correlated with lauric acid (C12:0), triseconic acid (C13:0), myristic acid (C14:0) content (p < 0.01), and ginkgo acid (C15:0) content. The total antioxidants (T-AOC) was negatively correlated with stearic acid (C18:0) (p < 0.05). Our conclusion is that the antioxidant capacity of calm Hu sheep is superior to that of nervous Hu sheep, which may be due to the higher AA (especially reductive amino acids (Arg, Lys, Ala and Glu)) content in the muscle and the lower FA (especially SFA) content, which improve the antioxidant capacity of the organism and allow for further exploration of the mechanisms by which animal temperament affects antioxidant performance.

1. Introduction

In order to fulfill the rapidly expanding human demand for animal products, intensive farming can boost productivity, but the resulting rise in a number of stimuli elements has a detrimental effect on animal health and production performance [1]. Animal welfare research is currently experiencing a slow increase, and there is a relationship between animal temperament and animal welfare. Animals can perceive the stressors present in a new habitat by exhibiting a wide variety of behavioral reactions, which are thought to reflect the animal’s temperament [2,3]. Antioxidant capacity is a crucial metric for measuring the degree of oxidative stress. Some preliminary research has discovered that nervous animals are more sensitive to pressure, which can easily lead to an increase in lipid peroxide, resulting in oxidative damage to the body [4]. However, the effect of temperamental differences on the antioxidant capacity of tissues and organs and the specific mechanism of action need to be further explored. Various flavor precursors (amino acids (AA) and fatty acids (FA)) in mutton have been shown to have effects on meat quality and to be related to antioxidant capacity [5]. However, no correlation analysis has been reported among animal temperament, antioxidant capacity, and AA and FA. This severely limited further investigation into the relationship or mechanism of action of AA and FA on antioxidant capability. Therefore, we hypothesized that temperament could modify the oxidation resistance through AA and FA composition in muscle. For this purpose, the current work was conducted to provide some basic data for animal health and quality breeding by analyzing the effects of temperament differences on antioxidant performance, muscle AA and FA content, and their regulatory mechanisms, and at the same time to provide new thinking directions for breeding high-quality animal breed technology and regulation technology.

2. Materials and Methods

All animal experimental projects were accredited and authorized by the Experimental Animal Care and Use Committee of Yangzhou University, China (SXXY 2015-0054).

2.1. Test Animals and Feeding Management

All animal procedures were in accordance with and approved by the Animal Ethical Committee of Yangzhou University. According to the nutrient requirements of fattening sheep with a body weight of 40 kg and a daily gain of 400 g in NRC (2007), total mixed diet (TMR) was formulated to feed experimental Hu sheep. The basic diet composition and nutrient levels are shown in Table S1. Forty Hu sheep 5.5 months old weighing (40.0 ± 3.6) Kg were selected, and then according to Bickell’s open-field [6], temperament was assessed by testing the behavioral responses of individual sheep to the presence of humans estimated. Briefly, the candidate sheep entered a test arena (3.3 m × 7 m), which was divided into 4 sectors of identical size through a door that was situated at the opposite end of the arena to a pen that contained a group of ewes that was visible from the arena. The locomotor activity of the candidate sheep was recorded as crosses by counting the number of sectors the sheep crossed, and the number of high-pitch bleats was recorded as bleats during a three-minute test. The higher scores for crosses and bleats have been found to be associated with a higher response to the presence of humans and is thus considered as a more nervous temperament.

2.2. Sample Collection

At the end of the test, the test Hu sheep were slaughtered, and six parts of tissues were separated, including muscle, liver, spleen, pancreas, kidney and intestine, which were respectively placed in 1.5 mL freezing tubes, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C.

2.3. Determination of Antioxidant Indexes in Each Tissue

The antioxidant indexes (total antioxidants (T-AOC), catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), superoxide excretion enzyme (SOD) and malondialdehyde (MDA)) were determined. SOD activity was determined by xanthine oxidase method, MDA content was determined by thiobarbituric acid method, T-AOC was determined by the total antioxidant capacity detection kit (ABTS method), GSH-Px activity and CAT activity were determined by the colorimetric method. All the kits used for index determination were purchased from Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute and tested according to the kit instructions.

2.4. Determination of Amino Acids and Fatty Acids in Muscle of Hu Sheep

For the determination of amino acid content in the muscle of Hu sheep, refer to GB 5009.124–2016 “Determination of Amino Acid in Food”. Appropriate samples were taken and 10–15 mL 6 mol/L hydrochloric acid solution was added, and 3–4 drops of phenol were frozen, hydrolyzed, filtered and dried. The sample determination solution was prepared by adding 1.0–2.0 mL pH 2.2 sodium citrate to dissolve the solution. The amino acid concentration in the sample determination solution was calculated by using the external standard method of amino acid automatic analyzer [7]. According to GB 5009.168–2016 “Determination of Fatty Acids in Food”, the sample was weighed at 0.1–10 g, the sample was hydrolyzed by the acid hydrolysis method, after hydrolysis, 10 mL of 95% ethanol was added to extract the hydrolysate to obtain the fat extract, then the fat was saponified and methyl esterified, and then methyl ester was prepared. The single fatty acid methyl ester standard solution and the mixed standard solution of fatty acid methyl ester were injected into the gas chromatograph, and the chromatographic peaks were qualitatively determined. Finally, the fatty acid standard solution and the sample determination solution were injected into the gas chromatograph under the above chromatographic conditions, and the chromatographic peak area was quantified [8].

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The normality of variables was analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk test of SPSS 22. T-test was used to analyze the influence of temperament on measurement parameters. p ≤ 0.05 indicates significant difference.

3. Results

3.1. Effects of Temperament on the Antioxidant Capacity of Muscles and Organs of Hu Sheep

3.1.1. Effects of Temperament on the Antioxidant Capacity of Hu Sheep Muscles

The MDA concentration in the muscles of nervous Hu sheep was significantly higher than that of calm Hu sheep (p < 0.05). The activities of SOD and T-AOC in calm Hu sheep were higher than those in nervous Hu sheep (Table 1).

3.1.2. Effects of Temperament on the Antioxidant Capacity of Liver of Hu Sheep

The activity of GSH-Px in the liver of calm Hu sheep was significantly higher than that of nervous Hu sheep (p = 0.050) (Table 2).

3.1.3. Effects of Temperament on the Antioxidant Capacity of Spleen of Hu Sheep

The activity of SOD and GSH-Px in the spleen of calm Hu sheep tended to be higher than that of nervous Hu sheep (Table 3).

3.1.4. Effects of Temperament on the Antioxidant Capacity of Kidney in Hu Sheep

The activity of SOD in the kidneys of nervous Hu sheep tended to be higher than that of calm Hu sheep. The calm Hu sheep tended to have higher T-AOC activity (Table 4).

3.1.5. Effects of Temperament on the Antioxidant Capacity of Pancreatic in Hu Sheep

The activity of SOD in the pancreas of calm Hu sheep was higher than that of nervous Hu sheep. The T-AOC activity of calm Hu sheep tended to be higher (Table 5).

3.1.6. Effects of Temperament on the Intestinal Antioxidant Capacity of Hu Sheep

The intestines collected in this study included the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and cecum. The concentration of MDA in the intestinal tract of nervous Hu sheep was significantly higher than that of calm Hu sheep (p = 0.005). The activity of SOD in the intestinal tract of nervous Hu sheep was significantly higher than that of calm Hu sheep (p < 0.01) (Table 6).

3.2. Comparison of the Antioxidant Capacity of Different Organs of Hu Sheep

The activities of SOD and CAT in liver tissue of Hu sheep were significantly higher than those in other organs, but the contents of T-AOC in muscle tissue were significantly higher than those in other organs, and the contents of MDA in pancreas and spleen were significantly higher than those in other tissues (p < 0.05). In general, the antioxidant capacity of all organs of Hu sheep was liver, muscle > kidney > intestine tract, spleen, and pancreas (Figure 1; Supplementary Table S2).

3.3. Effects of Temperament on Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Contents in Muscle Tissue of Hu Sheep

The contents of glutamate (Glu) and isoleucine (Ile) in the muscles of calm Hu sheep were significantly higher than those of nervous Hu sheep (p < 0.001), while the content of serine (Ser) was significantly higher than that of nervous Hu sheep (p = 0.016) (Table 7). AA were classified into reductive amino acids (arginine (Arg), lysine (Lys), alanine (Ala), Glu)) and non-reductive amino acids (serine (Ser), glycine (Gly), Ile, aspartic (Asp), threonine (Thr)). The results showed that the content of reductive amino acids in the muscles of calm Hu sheep was significantly higher than that of nervous Hu sheep (p = 0.029) (Figure 2; Supplementary Table S3).
The contents of lauric acid (C12:0) and thirteen carbonic acid (C13:0) in muscle tissue of nervous Hu sheep were significantly higher than those of calm Hu sheep (p < 0.05), and the contents of myristic acid (C14:0) and palmitic acid (C16:0) were significantly higher than those of calm Hu sheep (Table 8). The content of monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in muscle tissue of the nervous type was higher than that of the calm type. The content of saturated fatty acids (SFA) in muscle of the nervous type was significantly higher than that of the calm type (p = 0.001) (Figure 3; Supplementary Table S4).

3.4. Correlation Analysis of Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Contents and Antioxidant Capacity in the Muscle of Hu Sheep

The SOD activity in muscle tissue was positively correlated with ASP content, Ala content, and Lys content (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between CAT activity and Ala content (p < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between T-AOC content and Glu content (p < 0.05) (Figure 4). MDA concentration in muscle tissue was positively correlated with the contents of C12:0, C13:0 and C14:0 (p < 0.01) and was positively correlated with fifteen carbonic acid (C15:0). T-AOC was negatively correlated with stearic acid (C18:0) (p < 0.05) (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

4.1. Comparison of Antioxidant Capacity between Calm and Nervous Hu Sheep

Animals may experience oxidative stress in intense production due to a variety of environmental and social variables. For instance, a higher breeding density increases the likelihood of free radical production in the body, which leads to oxidative damage. In addition, bacterial infections, transit stress, cold and heat stress, animal fights, and inadequate hygiene in the feeding area can all result in stress responses and oxidative damage [9].
Generally speaking, lower MDA concentrations and stronger antioxidant performance are associated with higher levels of T-AOC, SOD, GSH-Px, and CAT activity in the body [10]. Studies have shown that people with schizophrenia, who frequently resemble animals with neurotic temperaments, have rather significant levels of oxidative damage [11]. Stressed animals have considerably higher MDA contents, plasma levels of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT), and oxidative stress levels [12], which is related to the loss of intestinal mucosal barrier function caused by intestinal stress [13]. 5-HT is a key neurotransmitter involved in mood regulation [14] and is intimately linked to the body’s antioxidant capability. When the body is stressed, it can stimulate the intestinal sympathetic nervous system and release norepinephrine (NE), which acts on the main cells synthesizing 5-HT through intestinal chromaffin cells and 5-HT-capable neurons, thus increasing the release of 5-HT [15]. It was found in experiments that the content of 5-HT in calm pigs was lower, while the content of SOD and GSH-Px in the intestines was higher [16].
We examined the changes in antioxidant capacity in the various organs of Hu sheep. One of the essential metrics for measuring the body’s antioxidant effect is the T-AOC of organs and tissues. SOD, a key antioxidant enzyme, is crucial for maintaining the proper ratio of antioxidants to oxidants in the body. The body can be shielded from free radical poisoning by this enzyme’s ability to scavenge anti-superoxide anion free radicals (O2-) [17]. The liver is the primary organ of detoxification in vertebrates and contains a variety of enzymes. Animal livers are susceptible to a variety of poisons because after a toxin enters the body and is delivered to the liver, it undergoes redox interactions with liver enzymes to lower its toxicity. Most vertebrates’ skeletal muscle contains the water-soluble endogenous dipeptide carnosine, which is produced in vivo by the enzyme carnosine synthase from β-alanine and L-histidine. Studies have demonstrated that carnosine has a natural potential for antioxidants and can considerably reduce the oxidation of lipids brought on by free radicals and metal ions. When preparing meat, adding the right amount of carnosine can prevent fat oxidation and preserve meat color. Reactive oxygen (ROS) is produced in large quantities in mitochondria, which can result in mutations in the mitochondrial DNA [18]. By safeguarding mitochondrial activity, decreasing ROS production, and preventing 4-hydroxynonenal from binding to elastin, carnosine can postpone the onset of aging and lessen the harm resulting from lipid peroxidation [19]. Carnosine also decreases the production of important intermediate reactive carbonyl compounds or prevents them from attaching to proteins, which minimizes the production of melanin and lipofuscin and limits the formation of further oxidative products. Carnosine can considerably diminish the rise in protein carbonyl groups brought on by aging, as was established by the administration of carnosine to D-galactose-induced aging mice. This might be connected to carnosine’s anti-inflammatory and anti-glycosylation properties [20].

4.2. Comparison of Amino Acids and Fatty Acids in Muscle of Hu Sheep with Different Temperaments

Amino acid content and composition in muscle are important indexes to evaluate its nutritional value and an important factor affecting meat quality. Meat flavor is mainly formed by Ile, Gly, Ser, Glu, Ala and Arg [21], among which Glu is the main substance constituting meat umami and produces flavor through the Maillard reaction and reducing sugar [22], thus improving the palatability of mutton. Arg can enhance mitochondrial biosynthesis, activate adenosine 5’-monophosphonic acid (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signal, increase nitric oxide (NO) synthesis, promote the transformation of fast muscle fibers to slow muscle fibers, increase intramuscular fat deposition [23], and improve meat tenderness and meat juiciness [24]. Greater economic value in the actual production can come from more delicate and better-colored flesh. FA in muscle have a significant impact on meat’s softness and juiciness as well as its nutritional value [25]. FA consist of PUFA, SFA, and MUFA [26]. Mutton with a lower proportion of SFA in total fatty acids [27] had higher quality and a lower prevalence of cardiovascular disease in animals [28]. Meat is susceptible to oxidative rancidity during storage and processing when the amount of unsaturated fatty acids (UFA) in the muscle is high, which affects the taste and flavor of meat [27]. The flavor of the mutton can be enhanced during production by altering the stearic acid and other mutton odor markers in SFA [29]; however, the high palmitic acid content of SFA will raise the prevalence of cardiovascular disorders [30]. In conclusion, nervous Hu sheep have inferior softness, flavor, and nutritional value to calm Hu sheep, which may be directly related to the amount of AA and FA in muscle.
An animal’s temperament also affects its behavior. Grumpy animals will have a greater response to stress, prone to display violent abnormal characteristics. For example, nervous animals will respond more to artificially placed shock rods and have a marked tendency to behave aggressively [31]. The study compared the behavioral differences between the two temperaments, and the results showed that the variation frequency of the nervous type was 2.4 times that of the calm type, indicating that the nervous type may be more prone to psychological depression and behavioral shift [32]. Meanwhile, the feeding time of calm Hu sheep is longer than that of nervous Hu sheep, which is more conducive to the fattening production of Hu sheep [32]. Animal behavior is somewhat influenced by the AA and FA contents. For instance, in the heat, a lack of arginine causes pecking, walking, and hostility in chickens. In the brain, Arg can be converted into Glu, and both compounds have the ability to stimulate the release of growth hormone and control animal feeding behavior [33]. According to research on animal pica behavior, fluctuations in the blood’s Ile levels may be responsible for the behavior’s occurrence in Angus beef cattle [34]. Additionally, if Arg is not fully involved in gluconeogenesis, it will not be able to supply the body with adequate energy to meet its needs, which would likely result in pica in cattle [35].

4.3. Relationship between Antioxidant Capacity and Amino Acid Content of Hu Sheep with Different Temperaments

Amino acid composition and content were closely related to antioxidant capacity. In the study on the effect of antioxidant capacity on Yili horses, it was found that the addition of AA in the diet could promote the endocrine SOD of Yili horses and reduce the free radical oxidation reaction [36]. Improving the efficiency of protein degradation into AA in muscle can alleviate the problem of reduced meat tenderness caused by slaughter stress, thus improving pork flavor [37]. Currently known amino acid antioxidant mechanisms include: direct scavenging of free radicals and reactive oxygen species, inhibition of metal ions to produce oxygen free radicals, synergistic action with other antioxidants, and reaction with oxidizing lipids to play an antioxidant role [38].
In addition to improving the antioxidant capacity by reducing the production of peroxides [39], Arg can also be metabolized to produce NO, improve the activity of antioxidant enzymes in the body, and reduce the content of superoxides [40], thus improving the immune and antioxidant performance of the body [9]. Thr is involved in lymphocyte proliferation, monocyte, cytokine, and immunoglobulin synthesis [41] and reduces free radical content by stabilizing and chelating metal ions [42]. Other studies have found that Lys also plays a beneficial role in body growth and development, immune function, free radical scavenging, and other aspects [43]. Both Glu and Gly are precursors of GSH synthesis, which directly affects the antioxidant capacity. Similarly, Ile can improve the activity of GSH in serum and reduce the concentration of MDA, thus improving antioxidant performance [44].
In order to obtain a more general rule, Arg, Lys, Ala and Glu were classified as reductive amino acids. Lys and Arg are both antioxidant amino acids. According to research, Arg has some reducing power because free radicals can interact with the electrons that the guanidine group of arg provides, interrupting the chain reaction of free radicals [45]. Ala is one of the hydrophobic amino acids and has a potent antioxidant effect [46]. This can be the case because the side chain group of Ala is an alkyl group, which can function as an electron donor to stop the reactivity of free radicals, and it has a certain capacity to provide electrons and a high reducing power [47,48]. As one of the polar amino acids, Glu is negatively charged and can scour free radicals by improving the water solubility of the lipophilic part of free radical substances [49].
In conclusion, the calm Hu sheep may improve the antioxidant performance of the body by increasing the amino acid content in muscle, especially the reductive amino acids content. Compared with the nervous Hu sheep, the health status, immune ability and meat quality of the calm Hu sheep are more prominent. However, the mechanism of how temperament regulates the antioxidant performance of Hu sheep through AA needs further study.

4.4. Relationship between Antioxidant Capacity and Fatty Acid Content of Hu Sheep with Different Temperaments

Antioxidant activity interacts with saturated fatty acid level. When the body has an excessive amount of SFA, the concentration of MDA rises, which causes apoptosis [50] and exacerbates oxidative stress [51]. Altering the mitochondrial oxidative respiratory chain’s regular operation might also make oxidative stress worse [52]. On the other hand, the body’s reaction to stress has an impact on how much FA is present. The amount of SFA in the milk fat of heat-stressed cows and the serum of stressed rats both increased [53,54]. Because the muscle of calm Hu sheep contains less FA and has a less robust stress response, it may have a better antioxidant capacity than the muscle of nervous Hu sheep. Figure 6 displays the study’s key findings.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the antioxidant capacity of the calm Hu sheep was higher than that of the nervous Hu sheep, with better health and production performance and more outstanding meat quality. Antioxidant capacity was correlated with the levels of AA and FA. Specifically, we report for the first time that antioxidant capacity can be improved in calm Hu sheep through higher levels of reductive amino acids (Arg, Lys, Ala and Glu) and lower levels of SFA, thereby improving animal health and production performance and that AA and FA are also associated with behavioral expression of animal temperament. However, the specific mechanisms by which temperament regulates antioxidant capacity through muscle amino acid and fatty acid content need further investigation.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/antiox12020459/s1, Table S1: Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diet (DM basis); Table S2: Comparison of antioxidant capacity in different organs and tissues of calm Hu sheep; Table S3: Effects of different temperament on amino acid contents of two kinds of muscles in Hu sheep (%); Table S4: Effects of different temperament on contents of two kinds of muscle fatty acids in Hu sheep (%).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.Z.; Methodology, J.Z., Y.Z. and J.W.; Validation, J.Z.; Investigation, H.J., S.Q. and P.C.; Resources, N.C.; Data curation, J.W. and H.J.; Writing—original draft, J.Z.; Writing—review and editing, M.W., N.C. and L.D.; Supervision, M.W., N.C. and L.D.; Project administration, M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National 14th Five-Year Plan Key Research and Development Program (2021YFD1600702), the key program of State Key Laboratory of Sheep Genetic Improvement and Healthy Production (2021ZD07; NCG202232) and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), China.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Committee on the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of Yangzhou University, China (SXXY 2015-0054), approved our study protocol. Each experiment was conducted according to the Guidelines of Experimental Animal Administration from the State Committee of Science and Technology in China.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or are uploaded as supplementary information. Data are available on reasonable request. Data generated and analyzed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the members of Meng Zhi Wang’s laboratory for their contribution to the sample determination.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Burdick, N.C.; Randel, R.D.; Carroll, J.A.; Welsh, T.H. Interactions between Temperament, Stress, and Immune Function in Cattle. Int. J. Zool. 2011, 2011, 1687–8477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Napolitano, F.; Serrapica, M.; Braghieri, A.; Claps, S.; Serrapica, F.; De, R. Can we monitor adaptation of juvenile goats to a new social environment through continuous qualitative behaviour assessment? PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0200165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bickell, S.; Nowak, R.; Poindron, P. Challenge by a novel object does not impair the capacity of ewes and lambs selected for a nervous temperament to display early preference for each other. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2011, 51, 575–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, J.; Qian, S.; Chen, J. Calm Hu ram lambs assigned by temperament classification are healthier and have better meat quality than nervous Hu ram lambs. Meat Sci. 2021, 175, 08436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fan, L.J.; Dou, M.L.; Wang, X.Y. Relationship between postmortem muscle antioxidant capacity and meat quality. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2018, 30, 1676–1680. [Google Scholar]
  6. Blache, D.; Bickell, S.L. Temperament and reproductive biology: Emotional reactivity and reproduction in sheep. Rev. Bras. Zootec. 2010, 39, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. The National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China, the China Food and Drug Administration. Determination of Amino acids in Food, a National Standard for Food Safety: GB 5009.124–2016; China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2016.
  8. The National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People’s Republic of China, the China Food and Drug Administration. Determination of Fatty Acids in Food, a National Standard for Food Safety: GB 5009.168–2016; China Standards Press: Beijing, China, 2016.
  9. Yin, J.; Han, H.; Liu, Z. Research progress of functional amino acids regulating oxidative stress in pigs. China Rev. Life Sci. 2019, 49, 193–201. [Google Scholar]
  10. Lu, Y.; Yu, X.; Lu, Z.Q.; Wang, M.Z. Straw tail food storage for fattening sheep slaughter performance and meat quality. J. Feed Ind. 2020, 9, 18–23. [Google Scholar]
  11. Xiang, Y.Z.; Da, C.C.; Mei, H.X. Plasma total antioxidant status and cognitive impairments in schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 2012, 139, 66–72. [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhen, H.L. Adjuvant treatment of constipation-type irritable bowel syndrome with Clostridium butyrate Enterococcus triple viable tablets and its effect on plasma 5-HT and oxidative stress in patients. J. Qiqihar Med. College 2020, 41, 435–436. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, Z. Effect of emotional disclosure on lipid peroxidation and 5-HT in rat brain tissue. Anim. Sci. Anim. Med. 2001, 6, 20–21. [Google Scholar]
  14. Li, X.L.; Li, D.Y. The behavioral spectrum influenced by serotonin. Psychiatry 1999, 3, 172–175. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sutherland, M.A.; Rogers, A.R.; Verkerk, G.A. The effect of temperament and responsiveness towards humans on the behavior, physiology and milk production of multi-parous dairy cows in a familiar and novel milking environment. Physiol. Behav. 2012, 107, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Han, Y.N.; Yang, C.Y.; Wang, Z.X. Effects of 5-HT on intestinal antioxidant function during stress diarrhea in weaned rats. J. Anim. Sci. Vet. Med. 2014, 45, 2067–2073. [Google Scholar]
  17. Wang, Y. Comparison of antioxidant capacity of liver between Red belly and pheasant. J. Tianshui Nor. Univ. 2012, 32, 17–19. [Google Scholar]
  18. Hu, X.X.; Zhao, L.H.; Zhang, Y.; Gao, S.F.; Zhou, Y.H.; Zhang, D.Y.; Liu, H.Z. Research progress of carnosine. Feed Ind. 2013, 34, 59–62. [Google Scholar]
  19. Larroque-Cardoso, P.; Camare, C.; Nadal-Wollbold, F. Elastin modification by 4-hydroxynonenal in hairless mice exposed to UV-A.Role in photoaging and actinic elastosis. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 1873–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, B.; Xia, X.L.; WU, W.X. Effects of Different levels of amino acids on Immune and Antioxidant Properties of Xiaoxiang chickens. Agric. J. Jiangxi Prov. 2011, 23, 158–160+171. [Google Scholar]
  21. Van, J.S. Formation of flavour compounds in the Maillard reaction. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24, 230–233. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.B.; Huang, Z.Q.; Su, Y.; Li, F.N.; Yin, J.D. Research progress on Nutrition regulation of Pork quality. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 32, 4555–4564. [Google Scholar]
  23. Han, L.Q.; Yang, G.Y.; Wang, Y.L. Study on free radical scavenging and antioxidant properties of carnosine. J. Henan. Univ. Technol. 2006, 27, 43–46. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wood, J.D.; Richardson, R.I.; Nute, G.R. Effects of fatty acids on meat quality: A review. Meat Sci. 2004, 66, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Zhou, X.W.; Huang, W.; Cao, Z.Y. Comparative analysis of nutritional constituents of Longissimus dorsi muscle in southern Yunnan Smallear pigs. Chin. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2016, 43, 1743–1748. [Google Scholar]
  26. Zhang, N.; Deng, Y.; Li, F. Effects of weaning time and age on fatty acid composition in muscle of Hu sheep lambs. J. Anim. Nutr. 2016, 28, 2250–2259. [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim, M.J.; Parvin, R.; Mushtaq, M.M. Inflfluence of monochromatic light on quality traits, nutritional, fatty acid, and amino acid profifiles of broiler chicken meat. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 2844–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, X.; Liu, J.; Ma, Y.J. Effects of compound Chinese herbal additives on slaughter performance, meat Quality and rumen histomorphology of Hu Sheep. China Herbivore Sci. 2019, 39, 22–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wei, Z.Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Ren, H. Comparison of Amino acid and Fatty acid contents in muscle of Meishan Pig and its Bachsia hybrid Pig. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2020, 52, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  30. Koolhaas, J.M.; Korte, S.M.; Boer, S. Coping styles in animals: Current status in behavior and stress-physiology. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1999, 23, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhou, Z.Q.; Wu, H.P.; Chen, X.Q.; Fu, M.Z. Character behavior of Boer goats. Northwest. Agric. J. 2008, 04, 10–13. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, J.S.; Yu, X.; Mao, J.Y. Comparison and correlation analysis of behavior, growth and slaughter performance between quiet and tense Hu sheep. J. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 32, 806–814. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gaskin, F.S.; Farr, S.A.; Banks, W.A. Ghre-lin-induced feeding is dependent on nitric oxide. Peptides 2003, 24, 913–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Li, X.R.; Zhang, J.F. Treatment of pica in cattle with Pingwei Powder. Chin. J. Vet. Med. 2006, 2, 38–39. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vandermeerschen, D.; Paouay, R. Effects of continuous long-term intravenous infusion of long-chain fatty acidson feeding behaviour and blood components of adult sheep. Appetite 1984, 5, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wang, L.L.; Li, G.Q. Effects of amino acid supplement on exercise performance and antioxidant capacity of Yili horse. Chin. Feed 2020, 7, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  37. Tian, Z.M.; Lu, H.J.; Deng, D. Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri LR1 on gene expression of porcine protein digestive enzyme, muscle antioxidant indexes and amino acid composition. Chin. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2021, 48, 2045–2055. [Google Scholar]
  38. Choe, E.; Min, D.B. Mechanisms of antioxidants in the oxidation of foods. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2009, 8, 345–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wu, C.; Liu, J.F.; Kong, X.F. Effects of Dietary Arginine and alanine on Quality, Amino Acid Composition and Antioxidant Function of Huanjiangxiang Pork. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2012, 24, 528–533. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wu, G.; Bazer, F.W.; Davis, T.A. Arginine metabolism and nutrition in growth, health and disease. Amino Acids. 2009, 37, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, C.Z.; Yu, Q.N.; Tao, L.L. Effects of oxidative stress on weaned piglets and regulation of amino acid on oxidative stress. Raise Pigs 2013, 1, 49–51. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kato, N.; Sato, S.; Yamanaka, A. Silk protein, sericin, inhibits lipid peroxidation and tyrosinase activity. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1998, 62, 145–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cao, L.P.; Zang, C.J.; Xu, X.J. Effects of Dietary Amino acids on exercise performance, Plasma Antioxidant Capacity and Metabolic indices of Yanqi Horse. Chin. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2015, 42, 896–902. [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, X. Study on the Combined Antioxidant Effect of Amino Acids and Phenolic Compounds. Master Dissertation, Jilin University, Changchun, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  45. Liang, M.C.; Yang, L. Mechanism of antioxidant action of arginine. Bioinformatics. 2020, 18, 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  46. Dong, M.Y.; Wang, Q.Y.; Liu, K.M. Structure-activity relationship of free radical scavenging peptides calculated by quantum chemistry. Food Ind. Sci. Tec. 2018, 39, 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  47. Guo, T.T. Coordination between Aerobic Glycolysis and Glutamate Metabolism in Glioma Cells. Master’s Thesis, Shanxi University, Taiyuan, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hwang, L.G.; Kim, H.Y.; Woo, K.S. Biological activities of Maillard reaction products (MRPs) in a sugar-amino acid model system. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wang, L.L. Construction of a Novel Fluorescent Probe for Detection of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species based on Antioxidant Amino Acids and Peptides. Master’s Thesis, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  50. Baymyn, J. Effects of Different Fatty Acids on Lipid Metabolism and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Hepatocytes and Its Mechanisms. Master’s Thesis, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  51. Dai, S.H. Study on Oxidative Stress Induced by Palmitic Acid in Dairy Cows and Its Mechanism. Master Dissertation, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. Xu, W.; Guo, Y.B.; Li, X. Palmitic acid activates inflammatory bodies through oxidative stress response of hepatocytes. J. South. Med. Univ. 2016, 36, 655–659. [Google Scholar]
  53. Li, Z.; Chen, S.N.; Ge, C.C. Effects of heat stress on lactation ability and milk composition of milk fat fatty acid composition of Holstein dairy cows. Chin. Dai. Ind. 2020, 48, 19–21+25. [Google Scholar]
  54. Luo, H.G.; Chen, J.X.; Yue, G.X. Metabolic regulation of Xiaoyao Powder in chronic bondage stress rats. Chin. J. Int.Tra. Wes. Med. 2008, 28, 1112–1117. [Google Scholar]
Antioxidants 12 00459 g001 550
Figure 1. Comparison of antioxidant capacity in different organs and tissues of Hu sheep. (a) Comparison of SOD activity in different organs. (b) Comparison of T-AOC in different organ tissues. (c) Comparison of CAT activity in different organ tissues. (d) Comparison of GSH-Px activity in different organs and tissues. (e) Comparison of MDA content in different organs and tissues. The values are expressed as the mean with standard error represented by vertical bars (n = 10). SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. a,b,c,d,e Mean values in the columns without a common letter differ (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 1. Comparison of antioxidant capacity in different organs and tissues of Hu sheep. (a) Comparison of SOD activity in different organs. (b) Comparison of T-AOC in different organ tissues. (c) Comparison of CAT activity in different organ tissues. (d) Comparison of GSH-Px activity in different organs and tissues. (e) Comparison of MDA content in different organs and tissues. The values are expressed as the mean with standard error represented by vertical bars (n = 10). SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. a,b,c,d,e Mean values in the columns without a common letter differ (p ≤ 0.05).
Antioxidants 12 00459 g001
Antioxidants 12 00459 g002 550
Figure 2. Effects of different temperaments on the amino acid contents of two kinds of muscles in Hu sheep (%). The values are expressed as the mean with standard error represented by vertical bars (n = 5). * indicate that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Figure 2. Effects of different temperaments on the amino acid contents of two kinds of muscles in Hu sheep (%). The values are expressed as the mean with standard error represented by vertical bars (n = 5). * indicate that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Antioxidants 12 00459 g002
Antioxidants 12 00459 g003 550
Figure 3. Effects of different temperaments on the contents of two kinds of muscle fatty acids in Hu sheep (%). The values are expressed as the mean with standard error represented by vertical bars (n = 5). ** indicate that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Figure 3. Effects of different temperaments on the contents of two kinds of muscle fatty acids in Hu sheep (%). The values are expressed as the mean with standard error represented by vertical bars (n = 5). ** indicate that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Antioxidants 12 00459 g003
Antioxidants 12 00459 g004 550
Figure 4. The correlation analysis of amino acids and antioxidant capacity in the muscle of Hu sheep. * indicates that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Figure 4. The correlation analysis of amino acids and antioxidant capacity in the muscle of Hu sheep. * indicates that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Antioxidants 12 00459 g004
Antioxidants 12 00459 g005 550
Figure 5. The correlation analysis of muscular fatty acids and antioxidant capacity of Hu sheep. * and ** indicates that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Figure 5. The correlation analysis of muscular fatty acids and antioxidant capacity of Hu sheep. * and ** indicates that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Antioxidants 12 00459 g005
Antioxidants 12 00459 g006 550
Figure 6. Regulation of antioxidant capacity and mechanism of amino acids and fatty acids in muscle by temperament in animals. Glu, glutamate; Gly, glycine; Ala, alanine; Ile, isoleucine; Lys, lysine; Arg, arginine; ARE, antioxidant reaction element; SFA, saturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; GCL, glutamylcysteine ligase; GS, glutamine synthase; NOS, nitric oxide synthase.
Figure 6. Regulation of antioxidant capacity and mechanism of amino acids and fatty acids in muscle by temperament in animals. Glu, glutamate; Gly, glycine; Ala, alanine; Ile, isoleucine; Lys, lysine; Arg, arginine; ARE, antioxidant reaction element; SFA, saturated fatty acids; UFA, unsaturated fatty acid; SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity; GCL, glutamylcysteine ligase; GS, glutamine synthase; NOS, nitric oxide synthase.
Antioxidants 12 00459 g006
Table
Table 1. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep muscle 1.
Table 1. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep muscle 1.
ItemCalm SheepNervous SheepSEMp Value
SOD, U/mL263.63211.0769.760.506
MDA, mmol/mL1.192.11 *0.200.019
GSH-Px, U/mL231.78240.26110.200.943
CAT, U/mL2.833.611.060.518
T-AOC, U/mL0.600.650.050.444
SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. 1 Mean values with their standard errors of the mean (SEM), n = 5 in each group. * indicates that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Table
Table 2. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep liver 1.
Table 2. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep liver 1.
ItemCalm SheepNervous SheepSEMp Value
SOD, U/mL2 049.502 018.53241.880.906
MDA, mmol/mL1.551.760.660.771
GSH-Px, U/mL160.34 *66.4129.440.050
CAT, U/mL113.25114.4510.830.919
T-AOC, U/mL0.030.060.010.205
SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. 1 Mean values with their standard errors of the mean (SEM), n = 5 in each group. * indicates that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Table
Table 3. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep spleen 1.
Table 3. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep spleen 1.
ItemCalm SheepNervous SheepSEMp Value
SOD, U/mL165.8565.0592.810.473
MDA, mmol/mL3.191.851.730.580
GSH-Px, U/mL1 007.75837.88204.750.453
CAT, U/mL2.202.931.040.598
T-AOC, U/mL0.030.030.201.000
SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. 1 Mean values with their standard errors of the mean (SEM), n = 5 in each group.
Table
Table 4. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep kidney 1.
Table 4. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep kidney 1.
ItemCalm SheepNervous SheepSEMp Value
SOD, U/mL751.65917.4580.530.132
MDA, mmol/mL1.302.350.900.325
GSH-Px, U/mL723.60529.55242.110.563
CAT, U/mL28.7626.178.540.811
T-AOC, U/mL0.020.010.000.219
SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. 1 Mean values with their standard errors of the mean (SEM), n = 5 in each group.
Table
Table 5. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep pancreas 1.
Table 5. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep pancreas 1.
ItemCalm SheepNervous SheepSEMp Value
SOD, U/mL468.54404.7158.890.470
MDA, mmol/mL4.562.980.520.202
GSH-Px, U/mL214.12217.4333.070.927
CAT, U/mL3.744.460.820.445
T-AOC, U/mL0.050.040.010.205
SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. 1 Mean values with their standard errors of the mean. (SEM), n = 5 in each group.
Table
Table 6. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep intestinal 1.
Table 6. Effects of different temperaments on the antioxidant indexes of Hu sheep intestinal 1.
ItemCalm SheepNervous SheepSEMp Value
SOD, U/mL231.14518.17 **11.35<0.01
MDA, mmol/mL1.012.73 **0.230.005
GSH-Px, U/mL207.49425.7175.250.062
CAT, U/mL7.2512.944.800.321
T-AOC, U/mL0.060.040.020.196
SOD, superoxide dismutase; MDA, malondialdehyde; GSH-Px, glutathione peroxidase; CAT, catalase; T-AOC, total antioxidant capacity. 1 Mean values with their standard errors of the mean (SEM), n = 5 in each group. ** indicate that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Table
Table 7. Analysis of muscle amino acid content in Hu sheep with different temperaments (%) 1.
Table 7. Analysis of muscle amino acid content in Hu sheep with different temperaments (%) 1.
ItemCalm SheepNervous SheepSEMp Value
Glu3.24 **2.790.02<0.01
Ser0.82 *0.750.020.016
Gly0.940.530.430.517
Ala1.231.220.020.799
Ile0.98 **0.860.010.003
Asp1.991.860.090.252
Thr1.010.990.030.576
Lys1.961.870.100.443
Arg1.381.250.040.062
Glu, glutamate; Ser, serine; Gly, glycine; Ala, alanine; Ile, isoleucine; Asp, aspartic; Thr, threonine; Lys, lysine; Arg, arginine. 1 Mean values with their standard errors of the mean (SEM), n = 5 in each group. * and ** indicate that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Table
Table 8. Analysis of muscle fatty acid content in Hu sheep with different temperaments (%) 1.
Table 8. Analysis of muscle fatty acid content in Hu sheep with different temperaments (%) 1.
ItemCalm SheepNervous SheepSEMp Value
SFA
C12:00.00320.0063 *0.00100.047
C13:00.00150.0031 *0.00050.051
C14:00.070.24 **0.010.001
C15:00.01740.03600.00750.088
C16:00.390.85 **0.050.002
C18:00.520.680.060.075
MUFA
C14:10.00500.00760.00200.294
C16:10.080.130.040.290
C18:1n9c1.842.620.790.397
PUFA
C18:2n6c0.260.280.030.597
SFA, saturated fatty acids; C12:0, lauric acid; C13:0, thirteen carbonic acid; C14:0, myristic acid; C15:0, fifteen carbonic acid; C16:0, palmitic acid; C18:0, stearic acid; MUFA, monounsaturated fatty acids; C14:1, cardamomic acid; C16:1, palmitoleic acid; C18:1n9c, oleic acid; PUFA, polyunsaturated fatty acids; C18:2n6c, linoleic acid. 1 Mean values with their standard errors of the mean (SEM), n = 5 in each group. * and ** indicate that there were significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences between the two temperaments.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J.; Jin, H.; Qian, S.; Chen, P.; Wang, M.; Chen, N.; Ding, L. Comparison of Antioxidant Capacity and Muscle Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Composition of Nervous and Calm Hu Sheep. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020459

AMA Style

Zhang J, Zhang Y, Wang J, Jin H, Qian S, Chen P, Wang M, Chen N, Ding L. Comparison of Antioxidant Capacity and Muscle Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Composition of Nervous and Calm Hu Sheep. Antioxidants. 2023; 12(2):459. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Jinying, Yifan Zhang, Jiasheng Wang, Hengyu Jin, Shuhan Qian, Peigen Chen, Mengzhi Wang, Ning Chen, and Luoyang Ding. 2023. "Comparison of Antioxidant Capacity and Muscle Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Composition of Nervous and Calm Hu Sheep" Antioxidants 12, no. 2: 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020459

APA Style

Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., Jin, H., Qian, S., Chen, P., Wang, M., Chen, N., & Ding, L. (2023). Comparison of Antioxidant Capacity and Muscle Amino Acid and Fatty Acid Composition of Nervous and Calm Hu Sheep. Antioxidants, 12(2), 459. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox12020459

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop