Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Body-Machine Interfaces after Spinal Cord Injury: Rehabilitation and Brain Plasticity
Previous Article in Journal
Improvement of Advanced Parkinson’s Disease Manifestations with Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus: A Single Institution Experience
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cerebellar Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation and Motor Control Training in Individuals with Cervical Dystonia
Open AccessArticle

Phase- and Workload-Dependent Changes in Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps and Triceps Brachii during Arm Cycling

1
School of Human Kinetics and Recreation Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X9, Canada
2
Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL A1B 3X9, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Bernadette Murphy
Brain Sci. 2016, 6(4), 60; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci6040060
Received: 1 November 2016 / Revised: 10 December 2016 / Accepted: 12 December 2016 / Published: 15 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Motor Control and Brain Plasticity)
This is the first study to examine corticospinal excitability (CSE) to antagonistic muscle groups during arm cycling. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the motor cortex and transmastoid electrical stimulation (TMES) of the corticospinal tract were used to assess changes in supraspinal and spinal excitability, respectively. TMS induced motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and TMES induced cervicomedullary evoked potentials (CMEPs) were recorded from the biceps and triceps brachii at two positions, mid-elbow flexion and extension, while cycling at 5% and 15% of peak power output. While phase-dependent modulation of MEP and CMEP amplitudes occurred in the biceps brachii, there was no difference between flexion and extension for MEP amplitudes in the triceps brachii and CMEP amplitudes were higher during flexion than extension. Furthermore, MEP amplitudes in both biceps and triceps brachii increased with increased workload. CMEP amplitudes increased with higher workloads in the triceps brachii, but not biceps brachii, though the pattern of change in CMEPs was similar to MEPs. Differences between changes in CSE between the biceps and triceps brachii suggest that these antagonistic muscles may be under different neural control during arm cycling. Putative mechanisms are discussed. View Full-Text
Keywords: motoneurone; transmastoid; transcranial; motor evoked potential; MEP; cervicomedullary evoked potentials; CMEP; cortical; muscle; central pattern generator motoneurone; transmastoid; transcranial; motor evoked potential; MEP; cervicomedullary evoked potentials; CMEP; cortical; muscle; central pattern generator
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Spence, A.-J.; Alcock, L.R.; Lockyer, E.J.; Button, D.C.; Power, K.E. Phase- and Workload-Dependent Changes in Corticospinal Excitability to the Biceps and Triceps Brachii during Arm Cycling. Brain Sci. 2016, 6, 60.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop